Jeb Bush

The CoronaVirus Scam Falls Apart

Update: New York Times tried to resurrect the Chinese CoronaVirus scam in time for Easter. But former NYTimes reporter Alex Berenson squashed them like a bug at a wet market and ate them for lunch:

———————————————————

The purpose of the NYTimes story based on leaks from HHS and DHS was to stop any reopening of America. The report “suggested, should the mitigation measures relax, the outbreak would be worse than before.” Liars figure, figures lie.

————————————————————

The “experts” needed CoronaVirus. World governments needed CoronaVirus. Lots of “it’s the end of the world” hysterics craved CoronaVirus. Fools wanted CoronaVirus. Big Media demanded CoronaVirus. Trump haters insisted on CoronaVirus. Wall Street desired CoronaVirus. Obama scam artists relived their Obama scam via CoronaVirus. Like all scams many interests for many reasons worshiped at the altar of CoronaVirus. Empty lives made CoronaVirus their god. CoronaVirus however is the Emperor without clothes and many now see the naked ugliness of why CoronaVirus became the scam it is.

CoronaVirus has been a scam from the very beginning. China scammed us all by lying about the CoronaVirus. The World Health Organization continued the scam by protecting China. Then the flowering of CoronaVirus hit the entire world and the scam flourished. For those that doubt we have been right all along about the CoronaVirus scam we give you an “expert” that confirms much of what we have written:

We mocked the lies, damned lies, and statistics way back when and now more and more see the damned lies from the statistics for what they are:

Yesterday, Dr. Deborah Birx finally let the secret out during the daily press conference in response to a reporter’s question. “I think in this country, we’ve taken a very liberal approach to mortality,” said Dr. Birx, who along with Dr. Anthony Fauci has become the face of this push for a national lockdown.

“There are other countries that if you had a pre-existing condition, and let’s say the virus caused you to go to the ICU [intensive care unit] and then have a heart or kidney problem. Some countries are recording that as a heart issue or a kidney issue and not a COVID-19 death.”

“The intent is if someone dies with COVID-19, we are counting that as a COVID-19 death,” concluded Birx.

So you have asymptomatic CoronaVirus and you get hit by a car the liar statistics declare you died from CoronaVirus. Paging President Eisenhower and his addendum warning against the “military industrial complex”. “Yet, in holding scientific research and discovery in respect, as we should, we must also be alert to the equal and opposite danger that public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific-technological elite.”

The CoronaVirus scam is laid bare:

The CDC Confesses to Lying About COVID-19 Death Numbers

Can any government statistics on COVID-19 deaths be trusted?

It is an open question now that we are learning that the highly respected, world-class Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has been lying to us. [snip]

The normal rules about reporting deaths have been violated by that city in the rush to inflate the body count, presumably to steer more taxpayer money to the Big Apple.

That the CDC isn’t telling the truth to Americans is no conspiracy theory:  it’s right out there in the open for everyone to see.  The CDC openly admits that it is fudging the COVID-19 death figures.

We know this because, among other truth-tellers, a plainspoken small-town physician from Kalispell, Montana, has pulled back the curtain.

Dr. Annie Bukacek, MD, explained in a presentation how death certificates are made.  (See “Montana physician Dr. Annie Bukacek discusses how COVID-19 death certificates are being manipulated,” YouTube, April 6). [snip]

The CDC counts both true COVID-19 cases and speculative guesses of COVID-19 the same.  They call it death by COVID-19.  They automatically overestimate the real death numbers, by their own admission. 

The numbers are lies. “Garbage in, Garbage out”, used to be an axiom in the computer programming world. Today it is Garbage out because Garbage in. Someone we thought we would never cite positively, had some smart things to say which comport with our analysis about how Chinese CoronaVirus is a rather cheap imitation of a pandemic:

This morning they revised their number of projected deaths to 60,000. That is a reduction of 90% from the 2.2 million number. But what else? Does the number 60,000 — 60,000 deaths — does that resonate with any of you? Does the number 60,000 mean anything to you?

Well, let me tell you what it is: 60,000 is the number of deaths due to the flu every year in this country. It’s between 30,000 and 60,000. So the very projections from the modelers who have given us our current circumstances, including the lockdown have now reduced their original projection of 2.2 million down to 60,000. That’s a reduction of 90%. Do you realize how worthless a model is you can input different data and get that wide a variance? [snip]

In fact, ladies and gentlemen, that 60,000 flu death number was 80,000 in 2018. [snip]

Remember, these are the doomsayers. They never lose. They are never wrong. They can always claim that what they “doom-said” is the reason we’ve had success. It’s the nature of doomsayers. [snip]

Dr. Birx said it. It’s a key word here. “If someone dies with COVID-19, we are counting it as a COVID-19 death.” “With COVID-19” does not mean the same thing as “because of.” If you have coronary heart failure, if you have a heart attack, if you have renal failure, kidney failure, and you also have — if they find that you’ve got — COVID-19, to heck with your heart disease, to heck with your kidney disease, they’re chalking it up as a COVID-19 death.

So it may well be that the number of COVID-19 deaths isn’t as high as we’re being told. But it’s obvious there are people who want it to be reported as high because they think that’ll help them with their mitigation efforts, keeping people sequestered and socially distanced and all of that. [snip]

“According to the most recent data from the [CDC], almost two-thirds (65.6%) of the people who have died after testing positive for coronavirus have been confirmed to have one of those specified underlying conditions,” diabetes, heart disease, obesity, kidney problems, liver problems, “while just 1.9% of the people who died after testing positive were confirmed to have ‘no underlying conditions.’”

Only 1.9% of the people that died in New York City were confirmed to have no underlying conditions. That’s huge! So people that have these underlying conditions obviously need to stay home. But we’re getting to the point, I would think, where we could begin to think about turning the rest of us loose — people that don’t have any underlying health conditions. [snip]

Pneumonia. Pneumonia deaths are way down. And that’s one of the things this virus supposedly replicates. It affects lungs like pneumonia. You know, pneumonia is a lung infection. A lot of people think pneumonia is fluid in the lungs. It’s not true. It’s an infection of the lungs. And the coronavirus causes something similar.

But the death rates for pneumonia are way down ’cause everything is being chalked up to COVID-19. They want the number of deaths up there. That’s the only way they can justify what the hell limits they’re putting on everybody here.

As the year began, Big Media did not think much of Chinese CoronaVirus. Big Media wanted to protect China. Obama Dimocrats like Nancy Pelousy and New York City officials insisted Chinese CoronaVirus was nothing and that citizens of America should go to various Chinatown neighborhoods to prove they were not racist. Then… the calculations changed.

As Big Media and assorted NeverTrump RINOs alongside Obama Dimocrats began to see the amazing Trump economic miracle begin to get hurt they calculated that a destruction of the American economy would surely stop the reelection of President Trump. So these creeps aligned to proclaim that CoronaVirus was a mortal threat to the world, indeed the end of the world, and that President Trump was the one responsible for the viral outbreak world-wide.

Unfortunately for them, the tricks that would have worked against boobs like Jeb Bush or his brother did not work against smart and courageous President Trump. If anything the polling everywhere in every demographic indicated that massive majorities agreed with President Trump that China was to blame for all the damage done to the world economies and health. Even more, Americans are waking up to the rest of the dangers candidate and President Trump spoke about:

What is the American status quo? It is the nation and its perceived global mission crafted after the end of the Cold War by America’s newly emergent meritocratic elite. In international relations, the fundamental tenets of this vision were the intrinsic virtue of America’s “benign” hegemony, globalism, free trade, a commitment to spreading democracy around the world, and an abiding faith in the country’s ability to salve the hurts and wounds of humanity. 

In domestic terms, the status quo has been characterized by relatively porous borders, the financialization of the U.S. economy, deindustrialization, anti-nationalism, a liberal political hegemony on social and cultural issues enforced through political correctness, and an oligarchy of bigness–Wall Street’s big finance, Washington’s big government, big corporations throughout the country, big labor representing increasingly well-off public employees, and self-aggrandizing state and local governments.  

This status quo is facing increasing hostility from vast numbers of ordinary Americans who feel that the elites and the big institutions they dominale have hijacked the American system for their own exploitation. [snip]

This knot of political hostility stems from the perceived follies perpetrated over the last half-century or so by the meritocratic elite–endless Middle East wars without victory or even much of a point; immigration laxity to the point of serious assimilation challenges; the outsourcing of our industrial capacity to the point where other nations, particularly China, control the distribution of goods and products that are crucial to U.S. military preparedness and citizen safety and health; a student-debt crisis that thwarts upward mobility of the nation’s young; a spree of fiscal irresponsibility that saddles cities and states with irrepressible pension debt while leaving untended massive infrastructure imperatives; and financial disruption throughout Middle America stemming from the hollowing out of the country’s industrial base. 

The central reality of American politics today is the gulf between, on one hand, the nation’s elites and their primary constituency groups (minorities, academics, government employees, and well-off urban/suburbanites) and, on the other hand, that 55 percent of the electorate characterized by Walter Russell Mead as being motivated primarily by an abiding hostility to what Mead calls “the self-proclaimed expert class.” 

This is an inherently unstable political environment. As Mead points out, “Populism arises when establishment leadership fails.”  

The totalitarian left thought CoronaVirus was the key to stop the reelection of President Trump. Then as President Trump proved his capacity for leadership, second thoughts of desperation seeped through. At the leftist Atlantic there is mourning in such articles as The Coronavirus Killed the Revolution. The argument there is that the proposed massive structural change of the left has been supplanted by a desire for “stability” and “normalcy”. More important however was the shocking publication in the leftist Atlantic of Consider the Possibility That Trump Is Right About China – Critics are letting their disdain for the president blind them to geopolitical realities.

Amid a global pandemic, he’s being accused—on this site and elsewhere—of alienating allies, undercutting multinational cooperation, and causing America to fight the coronavirus alone.

And yet even as the current emergency has proved him right in fundamental ways—about China specifically and foreign policy more generally—many respectable people in the United States are letting their disdain for the president blind them to what is really going on in the world. Far from discrediting Trump’s point of view, the COVID-19 crisis reveals what his strategy asserted: that the world is a competitive arena in which great power rivals like China seek advantage, that the state remains the irreplaceable agent of international power and effective action, that international institutions have limited capacity to transform the behavior and preferences of states.

China, America’s most powerful rival, has played a particularly harmful role in the current crisis, which began on its soil. [snip] “They didn’t tell us the truth,” one team member said of the local authorities, “and from what we now know of the real situation then, they were lying” to us.   

Now China’s propagandists are competing to create a narrative that obscures the origins of the crisis and that blames the United States for the virus. This irresponsible behavior and lack of transparency revealed what Trump’s National Security Strategy had identified early on: that “contrary to our hopes, China expanded its power at the expense of others.” Instead of becoming a “responsible stakeholder”—a term George W. Bush’s administration used to describe the role it hoped Beijing would play following China’s entry into the World Trade Organization in 2001—the Chinese Communist Party used the advantages of WTO membership to advance a political and economic system at odds with America’s free and open society.

But at some point, an American administration needed to shift the conversation away from hopes for an imagined future China to the realities of the Communist Party’s conduct—which is hardly a secret. [snip]

Trump’s emphasis on protecting U.S. sovereignty brought to a boil a simmering national debate about the overlooked costs of globalization. A blind adherence to what the economist Dani Rodrik has called “hyper-globalization”—the idea that the interests of big corporations and the principle of market integration took precedence over widely shared prosperity and economic security—had come at the expense of domestic industries. For years, people who complained about these consequences were dismissed as isolationists or as being on “the wrong side of history.” [snip]

Many of President Trump’s critics in the foreign-policy community put great stock in the ability of multilateral and international organizations to constrain the misbehavior of China and other states. These organizations, at their best, promote concerted action against commonly recognized problems. But Trump’s critics tend to view them mainly in their idealized form and as the central instruments to solve global problems and advance values shared by all. In practice, though, how international organizations perform is profoundly influenced by power relationships among member states.

China’s leaders have become quite skillful at using these bodies to pursue their own interests. [snip]

The Trump administration’s National Security Strategy challenged the assumption that international organizations are always driven by a common global good.

It is stunning to realize that Atlantic readers got to see such an article which demolishes their most cherished preconceptions of globalism.

President Trump was elected to “Drain The Swamp” domestically. CoronaVirus has revealed the intricate connections of The Swamp internationally.

The totalitarian left globalists tell us to “trust the experts”. Anyone who does not “trust the experts” is deemed a hillbilly to be mocked. But it is “the experts” such as Fauci who deserve the scorn.

The ObamaCare architects are demanding the United States remain shut down for at least 18 months or until a vaccine is found. They full well know such a vaccine is years away. Their intent is to stop the reelection of President Trump.

These same corrupt “experts” deplore the HCQ treatments so many doctors around the world extol. Why? The reason which makes most sense is so that an expensive vaccine can be found and sold by the very same people who mock the “Trump pill”.

All these “experts” thought the same way as the Obama Dimocrats and NeverTrump fools. They thought President Trump would do like President Hoover did when confronted with the Great Depression, which was not much. Instead President Trump has taken full charge not seen since FDR experimented unsuccessfully to end the Great Depression. It was World War II which finally succeeded where economic policy had failed.

The totalitarian left has consistently misunderstood President Trump due to their hatred. Instead of impotence President Trump has been able to stop all illegal immigration at the southern border thanks to the Chinese CoronaVirus emergency declarations. Now illegals are returned within 96 minutes to Mexico and zero asylum claims are processed. President Trump has continued to “drain the swamp” by firing Obama Inspector Generals as Benjamin Wittes’ salty tears flow. On China, total victory for President Trump as the entire world sees he has been correct all along.

President Trump is now supreme leader in his fight to bring back manufacturing to the United States as Americans see the danger of not being self sufficient but instead relying on a communist globalist world order. And as President Trump prepares to reopen the strongest economy in the world there is news on the issue that once was the hope of the totalitarian left:

Indictments. After Communist Chinese CoronaVirus comes Durham to remove permanently the deadly infection of totalitarian left globalists who hate America.

Share

The Bloomberg Debate And The Trump Victory

Update II: What should, or what will Bloomberg do now?

First, he will probably ignore the debate. It is likely that his campaign will take his best moment (the bit about the conversation being crazy and helps Trump) and turn it into an ad.

Second, having aired a lot of positive ads about himself, Bloomberg will likely start a negative ad campaign against his opponents.

Third, up the budget for the next wave of campaign ads.

Remember, Bloomberg is not on the ballot on Saturday nor Tuesday. Bloomberg is on the ballot on March 3. So Bloomberg has time to recuperate.

Bloomberg’s problem is that Steyer is about to begin attack ads against Bloomberg and most importantly there will be another debate before March 3. If Bloomberg bombs in that debate either the budget will really have to be raised or he will have to be just another candidate until the convention.

Remember, Bloomberg only has to keep Bernie from getting 1,991 delegates. Then at the convention he can spend money to buy delegates. All is not over for Bloomberg… money is a powerful friend.

———————————————————–

Update: Trump rally in Phoenix at 9:00.

The Trump rally starts at the same time as the Dim Bloomberg Debate on MSLSD. If there is a livestream it will be posted in the comments section.

——————————————————————

All Bloomberg questions will be answered by us today. We’re Bloomberg experts. There are stories we could tell you that would leave your mouths agape. But we’ll leave those fun stories for later in the campaign season and for our lawyers to review. Yeah, we’re Bloomberg experts.

After the New Hampshire results and our excellent advice to all the Dims, it is time we force ourselves to write about the Nevada caucus this coming Saturday, the debate on Wednesday night, and the results of the general election this November.

Back in May of 2007 we wrote about Bloomberg and his potential candidacy as a third party candidate. Read the entire thing if you want answers about Bloomberg that matter in 2020:

Bloomberg it was said was too much of a nudge, a dork. Bloomberg was a New Yorker, generally a hated group across the country. Bloomberg was short, was jewish, had no charisma, was a turncoat, was inexperienced, was a Republican, was a Democrat, was a local politician, ….

But Bloomberg is in fact likely to run for president. [snip]

As in ancient Rome, what is a billionaire to do with all his money? Use the money to become Emperor of course. [snip]

A candidate with lots of money can spend at will. A candidate with money does not have to fundraise.

In both races for New York City Mayor, Bloomberg spent an enormous amount of money. In his first race he spent nearly $90 million and his Democratic opponent barely broke into double digits. In both of his races Bloomberg spent the equivalent of what the government gives presidential candidates to run nationwide races. Let’s understand this: Bloomberg spent just in New York City what Republicans and Democrats usually spend to get elected nationwide.

How much money would Bloomberg spend to run nationwide? Silly pundits say he could spend an astonishing $500 million. Suppose they are wrong and Bloomberg decides to follow his historical pattern and outspend his opponents tenfold? Bloomberg could spend a billion, if not billions if he so chose. We suspect he will spend a minimum of a billion.

In New York City, Bloomberg hired every consultant who would accept a pay check from him, whether they did any work or not. Bloomberg hired just about every consultant thereby denying his opponents effective staff for their campaigns.

Remember, that article was written in 2007 and it is mostly about the New York Mayoral race of 2001. Anyone who wants to know what Bloomberg will do in 2020 should read our article and research the 2001 election in New York City. We’ll help with the research.

In 2001 there was an election for mayor in New York City. Bloomberg was a Democrat but wanted to run for mayor. Bloomberg knew he could not win a Democrat primary so he ran as a Republican and bought himself the nomination.

The Democrats were deeply divided. There was a Puerto Rican candidate from the Bronx. The Puerto Rican was defeated by Mark Green, a prominent liberal politician allied with Ralph Nader. The primary was bitter. Mark Green was accused of racism and he did some very dirty political leafleting in Brooklyn, New York which featured a dog being walked by someone. The dog and the walker resembled Ferrer and Al Sharpton. The leaflets were distributed in predominately Jewish neighborhoods which had long experienced racial conflict with neighboring black neighborhoods. .

Mark Green crawled to victory in the Democrat primary while Bloomberg won the Republican primary with the backing of the very popular Mayor Rudolf Giuliani.

The date of the primary was… September 11, 2001 – the date of attacks by terrorists which destroyed the World Trade Center. The primary had to be rescheduled due to the attack and the ashes of burnt stockbrokers which floated through the cool September air.

In New York City at the time there was a four to one matching fund for public financing of general elections. Mark Green took advantage of the program and spent a few million dollars total. Bloomberg spent over a hundred million dollars and won – barely.

Bloomberg barely won the election even though he spent over a hundred million dollars (what national elections then cost) to Mark Green’s less than ten million. Bloomberg had the backing of a very popular Mayor Giuliani (whom even Barbra Streisand and Rosie O’Donnell heaped praise on). Bloomberg ran a few weeks after the 9/11 attacks. Yet Bloomberg barely won against an under-financed candidate who had barely survived a racially divisive primary. Able to spend 100% of his time campaigning and not having to fund-raise, Bloomberg could barely win against a weak candidate.

Need we write our prediction of who wins in a Trump v. Bloomberg election?

The unanswered question is whether Bloomberg can buy the primary against Bernie Sanders? That question remains to be answered but our bet is that Bernie Sanders wins that battle and then is beaten by President Trump.

However, Bernie is such a weakling that Bloomberg has a chance to buy the election. Bernie should do what candidate Trump did in 2016 when he threatened to not endorse the Republican nominee if Trump was robbed of the election or treated shabbily. But Bernie is too weak to make such a threat. Fortunately for Bernie, the Bernie Bros are making that effective threat for him.

Other voices are now raised by the rabid leftists against Bloomberg:

Mike Bloomberg is not the lesser of two evils

To start with, it is not at all obvious that Bloomberg would even be a better president than Trump. As Alex Pareene writes at The New Republic, he is a right-wing authoritarian with nakedly racist views who constantly violated civil rights laws during his time as mayor of New York City. He locked up thousands of protesters during the 2004 Republican National Convention (where he gave a speech warmly endorsing George W. Bush, and thanked him for starting the war in Iraq), and a judge held the city in contempt for violating due process law. He created what amounted to a police state for New York Muslims, subjecting the entire community to dragnet surveillance and harassment, and filling mosques with spies and agent provocateurs. The city had to pay millions in settlements for violating Muslims’ civil rights. (All this did precisely nothing to prevent terrorism, by the way.)

As Nathan Robinson writes at Current Affairs, he drastically escalated the infamous “stop-and-frisk” program in New York, in which innocent black and brown youths were jacked up by cops literally millions of times.  [snip]

Recall that Bloomberg once argued that every Social Security card should have fingerprints so unauthorized immigrants would be unable to get jobs.

On the other hand, in some areas Bloomberg would likely be worse than Trump. As Mehdi Hasan writes at The Intercept, Bloomberg is a committed and pitiless warmonger — he supported the war in Iraq and repeated the Bush administration’s lie that Saddam Hussein had plotted 9/11. (In January he said he had no regrets about doing so.) He opposed President Obama’s Iran deal, and had few complaints about Trump’s assassination of Iran’s Qassem Soleimani. While Trump has escalated conflicts across the globe, he appears to have at least a mild hesitation about starting new full-scale wars of aggression. The chances of a shooting war with Iran probably increase if Bloomberg wins in 2020.

And for all the people who complain that Bernie Sanders is not a real Democrat, Bloomberg was literally a Republican up until 2007, and worked to elect Republicans until very recently. In 2014, he or his political action committee donated to the senate campaigns of Susan Collins in Maine and Bob Dold in Illinois. In 2016, he donated $11.7 million to Pat Toomey of Pennsylvania — making it the most expensive Senate race in history up to that point, and likely securing victory for Toomey, who won by less than two points. Though he has also donated a lot to Democrats, Bloomberg is a guy who did more than almost anyone to help protect Mitch McConnell’s Republican majority in the Senate, and hence to put two more conservatives on the Supreme Court.

At bottom, Bloomberg is basically just like George W. Bush, with a dollop of maddening nanny-state condescension.

The above is a “no” vote from Dimocrats on Bloomberg in the general election. There is also this lovely tidbit which reminds us of what we wrote about Bloomberg 2001:

It would mean that the oligarch class has so thoroughly corrupted the system that the voice of the people is drowned. His entire candidacy is a cartoonishly blatant instance of how money can corrupt democracy. Right now he is scooping up thousands of campaign operatives and field organizers by offering them as much as $6,000 a month — creating a desperate shortage for other campaigns. He’s racking up endorsement after endorsement — of representatives, mayors, and one governor, so far — who have cashed checks from his vast empire of bribery. His nomination would mean the Democratic Party can be “bought over the counter like so many pounds of cheese.”

Damon Linker, a rational analyst when he can put aside his hatred of President Trump, thinks the Dim Party is “hanging by a thread”. Aside from all the problems, Linker pinpoints Bloomberg as the bullet to the party’s existence:

But the real danger to the institutional party doesn’t come from a lack of consensus about which candidate will prevail. It comes from the candidate with the resources to turn the party into his own private conduit to power.

Mike Bloomberg is spending lavishly, hiring reams of Democratic consultants and political operatives, and networking closely with long-time deep-pocketed Democratic donors, persuading them to act as Bloomberg campaign surrogates and to ease up on their giving to his rivals. The result? In just three months, Bloomberg has spent well over a quarter billion dollars, mostly on TV ads in major media markets, and gone from close to zero in polls to a third-place 14 percent — even though his record on policy as well as personal behavior resembles fellow billionaire Trump far more than it does your average Democrat. [snip]

Imagine Bloomberg is merely able to ensure that neither Bernie Sanders (the early frontrunner) nor any of the other candidates can clinch the nomination outright by the end of the primary season. That would set up a contested convention — and enable Bloomberg to deploy his resources in a way we’ve never seen before.

What would stop Bloomberg from, say, offering every uncommitted superdelegate and every Amy Klobuchar, Pete Buttigieg, and Joe Biden delegate $1 million each to flip to him on the second ballot? And making a cool $500 million donation to the Democratic National Committee to ensure that the process of anointing him as the nominee goes smoothly in Milwaukee? This scenario would probably cost Bloomberg between $1 billion and $1.5 billion. Add that to the probable cost of $1 billion for the primary battle, and he’d be left with about $2.5 billion to spend against Trump in the 3-4 months of the general election. Without, once again, having to tap into his capital reserves at all. (For perspective, the entire cost of the 2016 election, the Trump-Clinton presidential race, and all 535 congressional races combined was about $6.5 billion.)

Indeed there is the rub. If Bloomberg spends $5 billion then what happens? We think he intends to spend $5 billion.

Oddly, at that point we expect Bernie Bros and Trump supporters to be one and the same in opposition to Bloomberg.

If it was a Republican like the loser Jeb Bush or Romney or McCain, Bloomberg would win with a $5 billion expenditure against the incumbent. But President Trump is not one of those losers. In addition, with a primary campaign against a billionaire for the nomination – Bernie struck gold.

In addition, there is more good news for a Trump victory in November. A new study of “non-voters” and who they are. It’s a comprehensive, expensive study which has good news for Trump and explains the Pennsylvania victory in 2016:

In the broadest terms, the study found the average chronic nonvoter is a married, nonreligious white woman between 56 and 73 who works full time but makes less than $50,000 a year. She is most likely to identify as a moderate, lean toward the Democratic Party, get her news from television and to have a very unfavorable impression of both political parties and President Donald Trump. She has a 77 percent chance of being registered to vote and says she doesn’t because she doesn’t like the candidates but claims to be certain she will vote in November. But the study’s real lesson is that averages are deceiving, concealing more than they reveal. [snip]

If they were to all vote in November, 33 percent say they would support Democrats, 30 percent Republicans and 18 percent a third-party candidate. More surprisingly perhaps, and potentially more consequential for November, these numbers gently tilt in the opposite direction in many battleground states, with nonvoters choosing Trump over the as-yet-undetermined Democratic nominee 36%-28% in Pennsylvania, 34%-25% in Arizona and 30%-29% in New Hampshire. Wisconsin and Michigan mirror the national average, favoring the Democrat 33%-31% and 32%-31%, respectively, while in Georgia the margin is 34%-29%.

That’s another way of saying “Trump wins”. After the 2004 disaster for Dims in Ohio, the very dim Donna Brazille wrote a review of the Ohio election which made George W. Bush a reelected President. Brazille concluded that the Ohio results suggested that contrary to conventional wisdom the more non-voters vote the worse it is for Dims. This new study of non-voters confirms that viewpoint.

At the debate on Wednesday night, Bloomberg will go against our advice in the previous post – not to debate. Bloomberg will be attacked and will respond coolly as he has been coached by his scriptwriters to do. It is all part of a script that we have all seen before.

And none of this will matter other than for entertainment value. In the end…

PRESIDENT TRUMP WINS!

Share

Hillary Destruction; President Trump Destruction

Update II:

————————————————————-

Update: President Trump appointed Bill Barr to be Attorney General as well as gave the AG great power to investigate the 2016 election. The Attorney General then appointed John Durham to poke around and investigate. Now, according to Trump-hating New York Times…:

Now, Mr. Trump’s own Justice Department has opened a criminal investigation into how it all began.

Justice Department officials have shifted an administrative review of the Russia investigation closely overseen by Attorney General William P. Barr to a criminal inquiry, according to two people familiar with the matter. The move gives the prosecutor running it, John H. Durham, the power to subpoena for witness testimony and documents, to impanel a grand jury and to file criminal charges. [snip]

The move also creates an unusual situation in which the Justice Department is conducting a criminal investigation into itself.

Mr. Barr’s reliance on Mr. Durham, a widely respected and veteran prosecutor who has investigated C.I.A. torture and broken up Mafia rings, could help insulate the attorney general from accusations that he is doing the president’s bidding and putting politics above justice. [snip]

When Mr. Barr appointed Mr. Durham, the United States attorney in Connecticut, to lead the review, he had only the power to voluntarily question people and examine government files. [snip]

Mr. Barr has not said whether Mr. Durham’s investigation grew out of the inspector general’s findings or something that prosecutors unearthed while doing interviews or reviewing documents. But the inspector general’s findings, which are expected to be made public in coming weeks, could contribute to the public’s understanding of why Mr. Durham might want to investigate national security officials’ activities in 2016.

Though the inspector general’s report deals with sensitive information, Mr. Horowitz anticipates that little of it will be blacked out when he releases the document publicly, he wrote in a letter sent to lawmakers on Thursday and obtained by The New York Times.

Giggle.

———————————————————————————-

Anyone notice the difference between Hillary destruction and Trump destruction?

The difference between Hillary destruction and Trump destruction is that when Hillary attempts to destroy it is she who blows herself up whereas when President Trump seeks to destroy, the target is blown to smithereens.

An example of this destruction disparity is when Hillary denounced candidate Trump supporters as “deplorables”. Who got hurt from this ugly attack? Hillary. This past week Hillary decided to attack Representative Tulsi Gabbard who is running for president and whose campaign is defunct. Or rather was defunct.

Hillary attacked Tulsi Gabbard as a “Russian asset”. In the same breath Hillary attacked 2016 Green Party candidate Jill Stein with the same assertion. It wasn’t too long ago when pathetic Hillary supporters sent money to Jill Stein so Stein could challenge the election results of 2016. Hillary kept quiet as her suicidaly depressed supporters sent Stein cash.

Jill Stein has long since declared she will not run for president on a third party or major party line in 2020. Tulsi Gabbard likewise declared that she will not run for president on a third party line, even if it was legal in states with sore losers laws. So why did Hillary attack those two non-entities as “Russian assets” who would run third party in order to help reelect President Trump because they will obey commands from Russia central?

What did Hillary accomplish with this attack against Tulsi Gabbard? As an attack the only one who got hurt was Hillary herself. Hillary comes off as a loon. A conspiracy loon. A conspiracy loon who can’t get over defeat at the mighty and entirely normal sized hands of Donald J. Trump.

Like Nancy Pelosi who lobbed bombs at President Trump but instead blew up Sleepy Joe Biden, Hillary put on a suicide vest to destroy Tulsi Gabbard but instead blew herself up. Tulsi Gabbard? Gabbard’s campaign gained what it did not have before – publicity and attention which lead to dollars – as Gabbard can attack Hillary repeatedly to continue to garner attention and money throughout the primary season.

Hillary attacked but the person destroyed was Hillary!

President Trump attacks rather frequently. The targets of a Trump attack are destroyed.

Perform a quick inventory of successful Trump (candidate and President) attacks. A never before political office seeker destroyed the entire Clinton political operation – Clinton Global Initiative, the Hillary2020 campaign, Hillary, Bill, Chelsea, the entire mess that did not realize they would lose the 2016 election until 9:00 p.m. election night.

Anyone remember Carlos Danger? That was the super secret sex pervert Anthony’s Weiner super secret anonymous name. Pierre Delecto is the super secret Mormon underwear coward name of Mittens Romney, the dog torturer.

Mitt Romney did not have the balls to publicly say what he believes. So Mittens the Mormon douchbag created a character with a foreign name and a Delecto/Danger add on to say what coward Mitt could not say. What a double D douchbag.

The real story is the Pierre Delecto account was a steady stream of hate-bashing Trump supporters

This, from the US senator who is supposed to stand up for ‘decency’

Now we know what they really think about us and our families— Jack Posobiec ???????? (@JackPosobiec) October 21, 2019

“Everything about this story says so much about Mitt Romney: his pettiness, his insecurity, his lack of character, honesty, and decency, starting with how it all unraveled.”

https://t.co/v5ybsxDpO2 via @BreitbartNews
— John Ocasio-Nolte (@NolteNC) October 21, 2019

Romney did not have the balls and does not have the balls. Romney is a Mormon incel castrato with an empty jock strap.

Joe Biden, scumbag Barack Obama’s vice president, was the guy who supposedly could beat President Trump and keep the Obama light shining. After President Trump declared him to be “Sleepy Joe” Biden has no little light to shine. Sleepy Joe and his entire corrupt family of Widow Hunter and brother James are no longer a political force. President Trump destroyed the Biden clan too.

Obama? That crooked clan from Chicago is also gone. From their multi-million dollar seaside house the Obamas can laugh at the fools who believe in climate change and the Green New Deal as anything but a money making flim flam from the same crooks that brought you Cash for Clunkers.

Pocahontas, she too is destroyed although she may not yet know she has been scalped. The McCain clan, their brightest days are trapped in a casket. John Kasich couldn’t get elected as a waiter in Ohio these days.

The Bush family? Get a T-shirt with “Where’s Jeb!?”. Candidate, now President Trump got rid of the Bush criminals too.

The Bush losers, the Clintons, the Romney’s (but not the great Ronna McDaniels), the Obamas, the Bidens… all destroyed… by the great President Donald J. Trump.

Share

The Old Order: Joe Biden Is Jeb Bush

Update: President Trump will be in Baltimore tonight at a GOP retreat. Sleepy Joe will be scalped of his hair plugs at a debate (on ABC) in Texas by Pocahontas – and Sleepy Joe will feel the Bern by Sanders. Lots of fun tonight for those not watching football.

We’ll be laughing along in the comments section. ——————————————————–

As President Donald Trump inspires the populist revolutions of Hong Kong and Brexit the political moment is now clear. The old order is rapidly fading, as Bob Dylan once observed. To see this truth merely remember the battle between candidate Donald J. Trump versus Jeb Bush.

Candidate Donald J. Trump most effectively decimated Jeb Bush with the descriptive laceration of “low energy Jeb”. Most people understood superficially what Candidate Trump meant with the “low energy Jeb” description.

By “low energy Jeb” Candidate Trump aptly described the somnambulist who was Jeb Bush. Jeb simply did not have any energy. Jeb could put electric power stations to sleep. Jeb Bush was like wet blanket, a sleeping pill for hundreds of millions. Jeb Bush was a bore but it was more than that, Jeb Bush killed enthusiasm of any sort.

The description of “low energy Jeb” had a devastating effect. It was so obvious that Jeb Bush was low energy everyone understood instantly what then Candidate Trump meant by “low energy Jeb”. But there was a deeper more profound meaning to “low energy Jeb”.

The profound meaning of “low energy Jeb” must be understood if we are to put the election of 2020 in context.

The deeper, more profound meaning of “low energy Jeb” can be found in all the great classics of Western history and world history.

When a ruling class is spent, when the ruling class is so dissolute it has nothing further to contribute it must vanish into the dustbins of history. The Czar system of Russia comes to mind. The old Austro-Hungarian Empire comes to mind. The old British Empire comes to mind. Indeed the current corruptions of the ruling class in once great Britain determined to overturn the Brexit demands of the British people comes to mind as well.

“Low energy Jeb” was not merely a comic assessment of a buffoon candidate. “Low energy Jeb” was a cosmic condemnation of the spent force which was the House of Bush.

Joe Biden is not merely a comic buffoon candidate from a corrupt political party which has nothing left to offer but lies and debauches at the public expense in the manner of Caligula. Joe Biden is the representative of the spent force which was once a great political party.

To understand that Joe Biden is the best candidate against President Trump the once great Democrat party can muster is not merely sad, it is a comedy reminiscent of the sex orgies in the cemeteries during the Black Plague.

Both the House of Bush and the House of Clinton fell in 2016 as they were demolished by Donald J. Trump. In 2020 more Houses of the ruling classes will fall without respite until the old order is entirely replaced.

Share

2 Bombshells: Birthright Citizenship EO; Trump 7 Days 11 Rallies Plus Pittsburgh

Update II: President Donald J. Trump in Florida begins the rally roundup of the last week before the November 6 elections:



—————————————————

Update: Obama Dimocrat Harry Reid, before he lost his mind, against birthright citizenship:



Jacob Howard speaks:



—————————————————–

Stay the course!

In a week in which Brazil elected Jair Bolsonaro – their own Trump and Angela Merkel of Germany announced the end of her political career, along with all the other Deep State corruption news, the big news is still the American elections. We are now 7 days until the November elections. President Trump will rally voters: Florida on October 31, Missouri on November 1, West Virginia on November 2 at 4:00 (ET), Indiana on November 2 at 7 (ET), Montana on November 3 at 12:30 (MDT), Florida on November 3 at 6:30 (CDT), Georgia on November 4 at 4:00 (EST), Tennessee on November 4 at 7:00 (EST), Ohio on November 5 at 3:00 (EST), Indiana on November 5 at 6:30 (EST), Missouri on November 5 at 9:00 (CST). These rallies will begin after President Trump and First Lady Melania on Tuesday solemnly travel to Pittsburgh to mourn and rally the nation in the wake of the murderous attack on a Jewish synagogue. That’s one big bombshell of Presidential activity and “uniter in chief” ministrations before a midterm election with a force never before seen. But the bigger bombshell is on birthright citizenship.

As the invasion caravans approach the United States, President Trump in an interview with Axios announced an executive order to end birthright citizenship which is the big magnet for illegal immigrants and birth tourism:

Exclusive: Trump to terminate birthright citizenship

President Trump plans to sign an executive order that would remove the right to citizenship for babies of non-citizens and unauthorized immigrants born on U.S. soil, he said yesterday in an exclusive interview for “Axios on HBO,” a new four-part documentary news series debuting on HBO this Sunday at 6:30 p.m. ET/PT.

Why it matters: This would be the most dramatic move yet in Trump’s hardline immigration campaign, this time targeting “anchor babies” and “chain migration.” And it will set off another stand-off with the courts, as Trump’s power to do this through executive action is debatable to say the least.

Trump told “Axios on HBO” that he has run the idea of ending birthright citizenship by his counsel and plans to proceed with the highly controversial move, which certainly will face legal challenges.

“It was always told to me that you needed a constitutional amendment. Guess what? You don’t,” Trump said, declaring he can do it by executive order.

When told that’s very much in dispute, Trump replied: “You can definitely do it with an Act of Congress. But now they’re saying I can do it just with an executive order.”

“We’re the only country in the world where a person comes in and has a baby, and the baby is essentially a citizen of the United States … with all of those benefits,” Trump continued. “It’s ridiculous. It’s ridiculous. And it has to end.” (More than 30 countries, most in the Western Hemisphere, provide birthright citizenship.)

“It’s in the process. It’ll happen … with an executive order.”



This birthright citizenship bombshell falls under the category “Promises made, promises kept” and is the big announcement the President teased at his rallies last week.

Recall during the primary elections in August 2015 when then candidate Trump debated Bill O’Reilly on birthright citizenship.

DONALD TRUMP: We have to bring our country back, Bill. We are in big trouble. We are losing so much, we’re losing so much to sell many and we have to bring our country back. We have at least 11 million illegals in the country not only the jobs they are taking but everything else. And you know about the crime wave because I think probably nobody has covered the crime wave better than you. There is a literal crime wave going on. You know, and if you look, we have spent last year $113 billion on illegal immigrants. We have to do something about it and we have to start by building a wall, a big beautiful powerful wall. It can have a gate. It can have a door. We’ll let people in illegally but we have to stop what is happening to our country because we’re losing our country.

BILL O’REILLY, FOX NEWS: Okay. Now, I want to advance the dialogue here. The strongest part of your immigration plan in my opinion is the wall. I think it is a doable thing. Rudy Giuliani came in here and you can do it. And that would cut down a lot of the illegal immigration and not only that, the drug trafficking which is out of control. So, I support the wall. But then you say, well, we have to have mass deportations, that is not going to happen because the 14th Amendment says if you are born here you are an American and you can’t kick Americans out. And then if you want to deport the people already here, each and every one are entitled to due process and it would take decades to do that and gazillions of dollars and the courts would block you at every turn. You must know all that.

TRUMP: Bill, I think you are wrong about the 14th amendment and frankly the whole thing with anchor babies and the concept of anchor babies I don’t think you are right about that.

O’REILLY: I can quote it. You want me to quote you the amendment? If you are born here you are an American, period, period.

TRUMP: But there are many lawyers — many lawyers are saying that’s not the way it is in terms of this. What happens is they are in Mexico, they are going to have a baby, they move over here and a couple of days they have the baby. No, but Bill, they are saying it is not going to hold up in court. Now it’s going to have to be tested but they say it’s not going to hold up in court. Regardless, when people are illegally in the country they have to go. Now, the good ones and there are plenty of good ones, will work so it is expedited, we can expedite it where they come back in but they come back legally. Bill, we have a country. You need borders and you need laws. We have no law.

O’REILLY: I have been saying that for decades I’ve been saying that. But you are not going to be able to deport people who have American citizenship now and the federal courts will never allow mass deportations without due process for each and every one. And do you envision federal police kicking in the doors in barrios around the country dragging families out and putting them on a bus? Do you envision that?

TRUMP: Bill, I don’t think they have American citizenship. And if you speak to some very, very good lawyers. And I know some would disagree. But many of them agree with me, you will going to find, they do not have American citizenship. We have to start a process where we take back our country. Our country is going to hell. We have to start a process Bill where we take back our country.

O’REILLY: Now, there is a way to do it and that is to try to get the constitution amended. Do you know how to do that?

TRUMP: It’s a long process and I think it would take too long. I would much rather find out whether or not anchor babies are actually citizens.



Candidate Trump was right, O’Reilly was wrong.



Jeb Bush and CNN attacked then candidate Trump.



All those who declared “it’s over for Trump” were proven wrong as candidate Trump became nominee Trump and then President Donald J. Trump. President Trump intends to keep his promise and that begins with a blockbuster bombshell challenge headed to the courts. Axios continues to peddle Bill O’Reilly’s arguments but many constitutional scholars agree with President Trump (we highlight the clause that should give President Trump’s opponents pause):

The legal challenges would force the courts to decide on a constitutional debate over the 14th Amendment, which says:

“All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.”

Be smart: Few immigration and constitutional scholars believe it is within the president’s power to change birthright citizenship, former U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services chief counsel Lynden Melmed tells Axios.

But some conservatives have argued that the 14th Amendment was only intended to provide citizenship to children born in the U.S. to lawful permanent residents — not to unauthorized immigrants or those on temporary visas.

John Eastman, a constitutional scholar and director of Chapman University’s Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence, told “Axios on HBO” that the Constitution has been misapplied over the past 40 or so years. He says the line “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” originally referred to people with full, political allegiance to the U.S. — green card holders and citizens.

Michael Anton, a former national security official in the Trump administration, recently took up this argument in the Washington Post.

Anton said that Trump could, via executive order, “specify to federal agencies that the children of noncitizens are not citizens” simply because they were born on U.S. soil. (It’s not yet clear whether Trump will take this maximalist argument, though his previous rhetoric suggests there’s a good chance.)

But others — such as Judge James C. Ho, who was appointed by Trump to Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, in New Orleans — say the line in the amendment refers to the legal obligation to follow U.S. laws, which applies to all foreign visitors (except diplomats) and immigrants. He has written that changing how the 14th Amendment is applied would be “unconstitutional.”

Between the lines: Until the 1960s, the 14th Amendment was never applied to undocumented or temporary immigrants, Eastman said.

Between 1980 and 2006, the number of births to unauthorized immigrants — which opponents of birthright citizenship call “anchor babies” — skyrocketed to a peak of 370,000, according to a 2016 study by Pew Research. It then declined slightly during and following the Great Recession.

The Supreme Court has already ruled that children born to immigrants who are legal permanent residents have citizenship. But those who claim the 14th Amendment should not apply to everyone point to the fact that there has been no ruling on a case specifically involving undocumented immigrants or those with temporary legal status.

The bottom line: If Trump follows through on the executive order, “the courts would have to weigh in in a way they haven’t,” Eastman said.

As a candidate for the GOP nomination, President Trump lambasted cuck Jeb Bush as “low energy”. President Trump promised he would be a president with the energy needed to Make America Great Again. Promise made, promise kept.

As a candidate and as President, Donald J. Trump promised he would firmly uphold the law and do everything in his power to end illegal immigration into the United States.



Stay the course!

Promises made, promises kept.

Share

@RealDonaldTrump Wins Election In High Stakes Poker Game Against Back Stabber @SpeakerRyan

This here Trump feller is one smart cookie. He’s a chess player yes. But he’s an even better poker player. During the primaries when the election was fixed against him in favor of Jeb Bush, Trump repeatedly said that if the Republican Party did not treat him fairly he would walk, and take his millions of voters along. The result was the Republican Party forced a loyalty oath on him, which Trump craftily used to trap the other nominees and the Party hierarchy, which in the end resulted in a Trump nomination victory.

Trump knew all about the art of the deal and Trump knew the GOP could not afford to lose his voters. As Trump won primaries, the GOP establishment in the form of the Mitt Romney clowns tried to use Ted Cruz as their cat’s paw to destroy Trump. Instead Trump beat them all. But rust never sleeps and these rusty political clowns continued to troll the streets in an attempt to scare Donald J. Trump.

Twelve days into October we can see the green felt table in the Riverboat with Donald J. Trump, in a vest, bands around his biceps, over his white cotton shirt, a Maverick style cowboy hat with silver band on his head tilted back, playing high stakes poker with blue eyed pus*y boy Paul Ryan.

Paul Ryan attempted a coup this past weekend. A Bush tape was released on Friday with Trump goofing around with a boisterous little Bush boy talking about women. It reminded us of that Hartford Courant interview with another Bush:

Question: “When you’re not talking about politics, what do you and your father talk about?”
Bush: “Pussy.”

When you see a bush, a pus*y boy is not far behind…

Paul Ryan thought he was clever. The tricks the little blue eyed pus*y boy plays on Capitol Hill, he thought, would be used against Trump to great effect. First, before-during-after the convention, attack Trump every chance you get for whatever Trump says all the while pretending you have made your peace with the Trump nomination. Second, at a crucial moment before a debate and a few weeks before the election, finally announce at the end of a press release that you invited Donald J. Trump for the first time to a campaign event in your home district. Third, after the invitation release the tape that shocks pus*y boys, in order to destroy Trump. Fourth, signal the grassy knoll firing squad with a very public “disinvitation” and denunciation of Trump. Fifth, get pus*y boy Mormon and Romney ally Jason Chaffetz to withdraw his endorsement. Sixth, get more pus*sies to disendorse Trump. Seven, after Ayotte, McCain, and tens of other GOPers denounce Trump, have everyone call on Trump to withdraw and hint the replacement will be the VP nominee Mike Pence even though everyone knows it would be Paul Ryan.

Paul Ryan’s plan never would have worked but Ryan never thought of that, because Ryan is a pus*y boy about to be schlonged by the big fingered Trump.

Why would the Paul Ryan plan never have worked? Because Trump is a fighter that does not quit. Trump wrote the Art of the Deal so he knows how to negotiate. Trump knows when to hold them and when to fold them. In short, Trump is a smart man and Paul Ryan is a pus*y boy. The definition of a pus*y boy? A pus*y boy does not have a strong woman’s vagina – he is only good at getting fuc*ed.

So after all the plotting, pus*y boy Paul Ryan found himself at a green felt table, in a Riverboat, playing poker with Donald J. Trump, six-shooters at his side fully loaded and rarin’ to blast. Trump got dealt his hand and then pus*y boy grabbed his, um, cards. Pus*y boy Paul placed his bet that Trump would get out after Trump saw all the chips arrayed against him.

Pus*y boy Paul placed his chips on the table – Chaffetz, the Gropinator Arnold Schwarzenegger (the guy that groped all those women and who while married to a Kennedy, impregnated his own maid), John McCain (the guy that has the dirtiest mouth in D.C. having even called his own wife a “cunt” and a “whore”), and threats of more, although Trump knew pus*y boy Paul had no more chips to play. Trump knew that at the Wisconsin event Trump was disinvited from some in the home town crowd booed the pus*y boy. Trump knew that Joe Heck of Nevada was also booed for his attacks on Trump. Trump knew he held, the trump cards.

So after pus*y boy Paul placed his bet, piled all his chips in the center of the table, the moment arrived. Would Trump meet the bet? Or would Trump fold, throw down his cards in surrender? Trump did what the pus*y boy never expected. Trump not only met the bet, Trump did what Trump does – TRUMP RAISED THE STAKES!!!!!

Trump put his chips on the table. Trump’s chips are the Republican Party at every level, the House of Representatives, and the U.S. Senate. Trump made it clear: “if I walk, I take my voters with me and you lose not only the White House, the Supreme Court, the Senate but you also lose all your power in the House of Representatives.” Trump made it clear he understood that a House of Representatives run by a Republican pus*y boy and a Senate run by a self interested conniver would stand up to the next president about as much as they stood up to Barack Obama. Trump knew without him in the White House TPP would pass almost immediately as would illegal immigration amnesty – and the Supreme Court that bowed to Obama on ObamaCare would be even worse. So Trump knew his voters and the American People had nothing to lose. Without Trump in the White House it was all over. So Trump raised the stakes in an international game of poker that even James Bond would not dare play.

Louie Gohmert, not an original Trump backer made it very clear that the current Republican leadership of the Congress will do nothing but make, then break promises:

Members on the call with Ryan described tense exchanges. The call lasted for about 45 minutes, before abruptly ending.

However, the Republican National Committee has pledged its continued support.

Some of the GOP’s most conservative lawmakers also continue to back Trump and chastise those who have abandoned him.

“We have to get on board. It’s all in or nothing,” Texas Rep. Louie Gohmert, who was on Ryan’s call, told Fox News on Tuesday.

He said 11 House members are with Ryan, whom Gohmert also lambasted for saying his focus is now on ensuring that Clinton doesn’t enter the White House with Democrats having taken control of the House, too.

“It’s not going to happen,” said Gohmert, arguing the Republicans now control the House and Senate but have not effectively stopped the Obama administration’s agenda.

Another House member on the call said outspoken California Rep. Dana Rohrabacher called Republican leaders “cowards.”

Pus*y Ryan and the GOP establishment only have energy to attack Donald J. Trump. The GOP establishment coddles Obama. Promises from the GOP of future action are null and void ab initio.


Pus*y boy Paul thought he could play his games and win. Then Trump raised the stakes. In retrospect, Trump was always going to win.

There are some Trump supporters, Monica Crowley on Tuesday night for instance, who believe that Donald J. Trump should let surrogates attack the GOP and that Trump should only go after Hillary2016. We respectfully disagree.

We believe Donald J. Trump should continue to be unshackled for the remainder of the week. Trump has been getting his kicks in at the opposition party in the form of Hillary2016. But Donald J. Trump’s real opposition is the ruling class establishment – particularly the establishment of the Republican Party – and Big Media. We think Trump should continue to break the GOP Quislings and Big Media all this week and into next.

Trump can turn his attacks and attention against Hillary2016 after he dispatches his GOP opposition party. Next week there will be another debate. Trump can go to the debate having defeated the GOP establishment and Big Media. Then Trump can take on Hillary2016.

A few days before the debate Trump can highlight the latest nuclear bombs exploding inside Hillary2016. The constant bombardment of the Wikileak emails will be an endless source of ammunition.



Donald J. Trump loves Wikileaks. Donald J. Trump loves to play high stakes poker. Donald J. Trump loves to win.

Donald J. Trump holds the trump cards. Despite all the cooked polls immediately after Friday to be followed by a dramatic rise after the second debate all the higher, Donald J. Trump will win. Why? Because it’s a change election. That’s all you need to know.

Share

#RCNinCle: Make America First Again And Other Brilliant King Tut Wholesale Lifts

Update: “Even many Ted Cruz supporters are seeing him for the reptile he is tonight.

Ted Cruz might have united the GOP more with his nasty speech than even with an endorsement.

An endorsement might have been an OK thing to do but most people would know it was not sincere and just politically expedient (like Marco Rubio). But the snake move, the disgusting reptilian speech by Lyin’ Ted has revealed to many of his supporter that Trump was right. Trump called him “lyin’ Ted” for a reason. Ted Cruz is a liar.”

There is now a visceral loathing of Lyin’ Ted Cruz. Trump tried to unite the party and therefore invited Lyin’ Ted Cruz to speak to the RNC. Then Ted Cruz proved he is a reptile, a snake, scumbag. The Art of the Deal. Trump gave Lyin’ Ted enough rope. Lyin’ Ted Cruz used that rope to hang himself.

—————————————

Who’s more clueless? Ted Cruz, The Dimocrats, John Kasich, Big Media, or Hillary Clinton?

None of the above see what is happening at the Republican National Convention even as they write and talk about the Republican National Convention. Plagiarism? That’s penny ante. It’s wholesale theft and it’s the Dims, Hillary Clinton, and Big Media helping the Republican load up the trucks. The future? Ted Cruz and John Kasich can’t see how the future has been taken from them already. Let’s discuss all of this.

In October 2015 we wrote @RealDonaldTrump Walks Away With The Clinton Coalition. The wholesale theft is happening in prime time and none of the clueless see it. Some excerpts of what we wrote that October 2015 day:

The white working class should have been the bedrock of Hillary2016. The white working class support for Hillary Clinton in 2008 provided grand victories of 40 point margins when Hillary was most wounded. Now Hillary2016 has repeatedly abandoned those voters. [snip]

The bedrock of a winning coalition, the people Barack Obama dismissed in 2008 as “bitter” and clinging to their guns and Bibles, used to be the FDR coalition and the Clinton coalition. No longer. They are now part of the Trump Triumph. Hillary2016 has abandoned them so they have abandoned her.

The counter argument to Trump winning the white working class vote is that Trump won’t get the nomination. At every turn we hear of a new pawn up to the job of destroying Donald J. Trump. [snip]

Donald J. Trump is not a conservative the GOP establishment likes nor a liberal the Democratic Party likes. Donald Trump will destroy the Republican Party as we now know it because Barack Obama destroyed the Democratic Party as we once knew it. The GOP has long contained a struggle between it’s populist voters and the big money Chamber of Commerce types that want a low wage society. Donald Trump is against a low wage society and therefore against illegal immigration. The white working class understands this. Enough of the black working class and the Latino working class understands this too.

The white working class chased out of the Democratic Party by Obama’s Kook coalition had no where to go but to the Republican Party. Now the former Democrats join in solidarity with the long time populist Republicans – ergo TRUMP.

There’s a wholesale theft going on every night in Cleveland and all Big Media and the dummies talk about is “plagiarism”. They don’t see the obvious. Every time that magnificently beautiful Melania Trump gets negative or positive Big Media coverage comparing her in any way to Michelle Obama it is a boon for Trump2016. Why? Because the medium is the message! It’s teleVISION. You see that gorgeous exotic bird Melania Trump. Then you see what looks like a Moose in high heels.

In rap music it’s called “sampling” but in order to damage Trump2016 all Big Media and the dummy ally Dimocrats want to wail about is “plagiarism” – not realizing the beautiful bird wins over the high heeled moose. While the dummies caterwaul about “plagiarism” the wholesale theft of the working class voters and what used to be Democratic Party themes is being stolen by the truckload.

Some see the wholesale theft and watch with glee. Barack Obama destroyed the Democratic Party and its winning FDR/Kennedy/Clinton coalition therefore homeless Democrats have gone to Trump. The latest prime time laugh is how the Republicans, in full prime time Klieg lights have put in their platform a return of Glass Steagall:

Republican Platform Under Trump Backs Glass-Steagall’s Return

Republican National Convention delegates approved a platform Monday that calls for reinstating the Glass-Steagall Act and scaling back the Dodd-Frank financial overhaul, calling it the Democrats’ “legislative Godzilla.”

The Glass-Steagall measure puts presumptive presidential nominee Donald Trump and his party in the company of unlikely allies such as Bernie Sanders, the democratic socialist who ran against Democrat Hillary Clinton on a plan that included Glass-Steagall reinstatement, underscoring the blurring of political lines in the 2016 race. [snip]

Trump has been a vocal critic of trade deals such as the TPP and the North American Free Trade Agreement, saying they have cost U.S. jobs and should be renegotiated. His stance has pitted him against some party stalwarts and pro-business groups such as the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.

“We support reinstating the Glass-Steagall Act of 1933 which prohibits commercial banks from engaging in high-risk investment,” said the platform released by the Republican National Committee.

Clinton, whose husband signed a repeal of the law in 1999, doesn’t advocate for its return.

“We believe that the Obama-Clinton years have passed legislation that has been favorable to the big banks, which is one of the reason why you see all of the Wall Street money going to her,” Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort told reporters prior to the platform’s approval.

“We are supporting the small banks and Main Street. We talk about legislation that affects, you know, some of the mistakes made in repealing Glass-Steagall and some of the mistakes made in imposing Dodd-Frank. The platform reflects those things,” Manafort said.

It’s a wholesale theft in prime time Klieg lights but all Big Media and Dimocrats want to do is give more publicity to that beautiful bird of happiness Melania Trump.

It’s wholesale theft in prime time Klieg lights with trucks lined up for miles as they load up on the stolen goods. Goldfinger never dreamed so big.

The wholesale theft goes on every night! Bill Clinton’s 1992 campaign slogan was Putting People First. Tonight’s theme at the Donald J. Trump RNC is “Make America First Again. Last night the theme was “Make America Work Again which we noted was the old “JOBS, JOBS, JOBS” recycled for a new era and new leadership.

Tonight’s theme is a variant of Putting People First although Big Media and the rest of the clueless insist on slapping on nationalist paint to cover the appeal of the message to the working class. Even the first night’s Make America Safe Again was a retread of the old “security mom” argument designed to appeal to women.

The Donald J. Trump #RNCinCle convention is the greatest robbery of a grave site since Howard Carter and Lord Carnarvon looted the tomb of King Tut.

Clueless Big Media, Hillary Clinton, the Obama Dimocrats, are not the only clueless clowns. After all Lyin’ Ted Cruz and John Kasich are still alive.

Last night a spectacular speech was given by Donald Trump, Jr. The speech by Trump Jr. was very well delivered and full of powerful messages. In that speech the Donald J. Trump movement became greater and long-lasting.



The speech by Trump Jr. was very effective as a boost to Donald J. Trump. But much more happened in that speech. The transcript of Donald Trump, Jr.’s speech to the RNC reveals the golden nuggets:

For the first time, parents no longer think that their kids will be as well off as we were. We’ve lost the confidence in our leaders and the faith in our institutions. [snip]

He didn’t hide out behind some desk in an executive suite. He spent his career with regular Americans. He hung out with the guys on construction sites, pouring sheet rock and pouring concrete and hanging sheet rock. He listened to them and he valued their opinions as much and often more than the guys from Harvard and Wharton locked away in offices, away from the real work.

He’s recognized the talent and the drive that all Americans have.

He’s promoted people based on their character, their street smarts, and their work ethic, not simply paper credentials.

To this day, many of the top executives in our company are individuals that started out in positions that were blue collar. But he saw something in them and he pushed them to succeed.

The true gift as a leader is that he sees the potential in people that they don’t even see in themselves – the potential that other executives would overlook because their resumes don’t include the names of fancy colleges and degrees.

I know he values those workers and those qualities in people, because those are the individuals he had my sibling and me work under when we started out.

That he would trust his own children’s formative years to these men and women says all you need to know about Donald Trump.

We didn’t learn from MBAs. We learned from people who had doctorates in common sense. Guys like Vinny Stellio [sp], who taught us how to drive heavy equipment, operate tractors and chainsaws, who worked his way through the ranks to become a trusted adviser of my father.

It’s why we’re the only children of billionaires as comfortable in a D10 Caterpillar as we are in our own cars.

My father knew that those were the guys and gals that would teach us the dignity of hard work from a very young age.

He knows that at the heart of the American dream is the idea that whoever we are, wherever we’re from, we can get ahead, where everyone can prosper together.

The other party also tells us they believe in the American dream. They say we should worry about economic inequality and immobility.

You know what? They’re right. But they don’t tell you that it was their policies that caused the problem and it was their policies that have no accountability.

They gave us the worst immigration system in the world, one that imports immobility, one that drives down employment and wages for Hispanic Americans, for African Americans, and for everyone. An immigration system that favors illegals over those trying to go through the process legally and, at times, even over law-abiding citizens.

It was Bernie Sanders himself who warned that a large tide of new workers keeps wages low and poverty high.

The other party gave us public schools that far too often fail our students, especially those who have no options. [snip]

They want to run everything top-down from Washington. They tell us they’re the experts and they know what’s best.

The other party gave us a regulatory state on steroids. [snip]

Imagine trying to digest all that before you even open your doors for business. That doesn’t help consumers. What it does is destroy small business in favor of big businesses who can afford the vast number of lawyers and accountants needed to comply. Dodd-Frank is consumer protection for billionaires.

We’ve produced the thickest network of patronage and influence of any country at any time in world history. It’s composed of a self-satisfied people at the top – our new aristocrats. We can’t live that way any longer, it’s too risky.

“Our new aristocrats!” That’s revolutionary stuff and delivered at the New Republican Party convention! Our excerpts are from only half of the speech delivered by Donald Trump, Jr. There’s plenty more.

Donald Trump, Jr.’s speech is a speech that long ago could have been delivered at a Democratic Party Convention to great applause if it was delivered by a rich Kennedy or a rich Roosevelt. Listen to the echoes of what once was the great Democratic Party in defense of the working class as delivered by Donald Trump, Jr.:

We will not accept the current state of our country because it’s too hard to change. That’s not the America I know.

We’re going to unleash the creative spirit and energy of all Americans.

We’re going to make our schools the best in the world for every single American of every single ethnicity and background.

We’re going to put Americans first. All Americans. Not a special class of crony elites at the top of the heap.

We’re going to elect a president who will work with everyone to pass legislation that will make our country great again.

It’s an astonishing speech in defense of the working class and the American people.

The Donald Trump Jr. speech is very positive and with every positive it is an attack against the opposition party. But it is much more than that.

Clueless John Kasich, Ted Cruz, believe that if they can sink Donald J. Trump in 2016 they will be positioned for victory in 2020. That is delusional.

Jeb Bush thought he was destined to be the Republican nominee for president in 2016 because the primary schedule and every rule was designed to fix the election for Jeb’s victory. All the rules Jeb Bush set in place insured the nomination of Donald J. Trump. Jeb! only received 3 delegate votes from the convention which means Jeb! spend $50 million per delegate.

John Kasich and Ted Cruz think if they sabotage Trump2016 and fix the rules to their benefit somehow they will be the future. They are clueless.

The Republican National Convention has created a New Republican Party. Donald J. Trump is the future of the Republican Party no matter what happens in November. If Trump wins that is an obvious truth. But even if Trump would lose, Trumpism will rule the day at the New Republican Party.

The moment Donald Trump Jr. spoke it became clear there was one obvious heir to Donald J. Trump and many others lined up with the movement. Clueless Ted Cruz and Clueless John Kasich can’t see the future is now. Neither can the other clueless, their pockets picked, houses empty, as the future rolls forward by the truckload.

Share

Bestiality Fix #2: The Real Lyin’ Ted #CruzSexScandal

Update: Regarding Corey Lewandowski charged in Florida for battery. Michelle Fields lied about Corey Lewandowski and the proof is in what she herself wrote about the incident. Fields wrote “Someone had grabbed me tightly by the arm and yanked me down. I almost fell to the ground…” Liar! Fields is a dumb Cruz supporter masquerading as a reporter. Lewandowski should claim “stand your ground” status and file counterclaim charges against Fields because she touched him first which apparently counts for battery in Florida.

———————————-

There is nothing dumber than a Ted Cruz supporter. We wrote that in question form in early August of 2015. Today we report that Ted Cruz supporters have become even dumber. Ted Cruz supporters, the honest ones if such a thing exists, are dumber than ever. Ted Cruz supporters are over the edge of dumb, well past stupid… beyond whatever word expresses the deepest depth of stupidity… that is the level of non-intelligence sunk to by honest Ted Cruz supporters.

Back in early August of 2015 we explained that either Jeb Bush or Donald Trump would be the GOP nominee, in our article Newsflash: It’s A Fix – It’s Trump Or Bush That Will Win – Cruz, Rubio, Kasich, Huckabee, Carson, Walker, Paul, Christie, Are Losers:

We’ll explain it to you now: This GOP primary election is a fix. The entire primary process and schedule was designed to nominate Jeb Bush. But Donald Trump surprised everyone and got in the race. Donald Trump has the money. Donald Trump has the Big Media expertise. Donald Trump has the experience of dealing in politics and with politicians. It was all “fixed” for Jeb Bush and then Trump got in.

As we wrote before, Trump can win. Why? Trump can win because he can take advantage of the fix that was set up to benefit Jeb Bush. Put that in your jock straps and wiggle.

Donald Trump has the financial advantage Jeb Bush thought he would have. Donald Trump can not only win (according to all the polls from those states) Iowa, New Hampshire, Nevada, South Carolina (latest poll there has Donald Trump ahead with 34% Jeb Bush 10%) but he can knock out Jeb Bush and win Florida and all those many many delegates. No other candidate can do that.

Hey, dummies, why do we call you dummies, especially you Ted Cruz dummies? We call you dummies because you think that once Trump goes away your candidate will rise and maybe have a chance to win. That’s so stupid. Your candidates don’t have a chance. The fix is in. We think Ted Cruz supporters are especially stupid because they think that the establishment figure most hated by the establishment due to his personality and obnoxiousness (which we do think should be admired by the way) won’t be swept away with ease by the very forces that have tried with all their raw power and vitriol to destroy Donald Trump. [snip]

The fix is in dummies. Only one candidate can win now other than Jeb Bush. Like it or not it is Trump or Bush.

We waited until after the first debate to make this assessment. But it is clear now that Trump is the sole alternative. If Trump is knocked out one by one the others – Cruz, Paul, Walker, Kasich, Rubio, will be dismantled and sent to oblivion. The fix is in. The establishment gets what it wants. Except of course that Donald Trump remains standing.

The above quote is not particularly complicated. But for honest Cruz supporters it is high level physics written in a foreign language. These stupid Cruz supporters are so stupid they somehow found themselves cheered when first the corrupt Neil Bush endorsed Ted Cruz only to be followed by the grand Jeb Bush endorsement of Ted Cruz. It’s like a turkey cheering the approach of the Thanksgiving holiday.

Consider how utterly stupid, dumb, idiotic, Ted Cruz supporters are. These dolts now await the Wisconsin primary with great hope that Cruz will beat Trump there. But the Ted Cruz campaign is a steaming pile of failure already, with zero possibility of success. First, a “victory” for Cruz in Wisconsin does not help Cruz – it helps Jeb Bush and the establishment. Second, the Ted Cruz strategy called for victory in South Carolina, dubbed the gateway to the South by Ted Cruz strategists, which would lead to many primary victories in the South – none of which happened. Third, the latest Ted Cruz strategy for victory written before the vote in Arizona, “Inside Cruz’s state-by-state plan to defeat Trump”, has already failed:

Inside Cruz’s state-by-state plan to defeat Trump
Rubio and Kasich might be sweating Tuesday but Cruz is looking down the road to a #NeverTrump sweep.

But that consolidation has to happen fast. Cruz’s top strategists say they believe Cruz must win decisively in Arizona and Utah, the next states to vote on March 22. [snip]

Cruz quietly began buying ad time in Arizona over the weekend, reserving $200,000 over 10 days, making him the first to buy ads in any state that votes after March 15. Cruz hired a top Arizona strategist six months ago, zeroing in on its potential significance as an inflection point on the calendar as early as last September.

In the wake of the strategic failure in South Carolina, the SEC primaries, Nevada, and the other Southern states, the Ted Cruz campaign plotted yet another ridiculous path (recall Little Marco’s 1-2-3 strategy which likewise went bust) to victory which required victory in Arizona. But Donald Trump won Arizona so there is no path to victory for Ted Cruz by his own measure! Further, as the Ted Cruz “state-by-state plan to defeat Trump” strategized, Ted Cruz had to win Illinois, Missouri, and North Carolina, but Ted Cruz has lost those states as well. For Ted Cruz the “state-by-state plan to defeat Trump” has failed utterly and will fail in the states soon to vote:

Another problem for Cruz is the nomination map itself. As Rubio has repeatedly pointed out, the states after March 15 are less favorable to Cruz’s religious brand of conservatism. Many of the most evangelical states have already voted. And Cruz has mostly struggled in the Northeast (where Trump has mostly romped). Connecticut and Rhode Island are still to come, as are nearby Mid-Atlantic states, including delegate-rich Pennsylvania, Maryland, Delaware, plus New York and New Jersey.

On its working map, the Cruz campaign cedes New Jersey and its 51 winner-take-all delegates to Trump and assumes the tycoon will carry his home state of New York.

The Cruz campaign has failed to meet strategic goals consistently. Every new strategic plan is quickly torched by Trump. Yet stupid Ted Cruz supporters continue to believe that the new failed strategic plan and the next sure to fail strategic plan and the next strategic plan failure will do the trick. That’s how stupid Ted Cruz supporters are.

Trump supporters at HotGas rewrite what we wrote back in August 2015, with updated results which spell out the endgame:

Right now Trump has just under a 300-delegate lead over Ted Cruz. The pro­por­tion­ally award­ing state pri­maries are nearly fin­ished, and there will be no more cau­cuses. [snip]

Accord­ing to NWConservative’s analy­sis, on April 19, if Trump wins New York’s 95 del­e­gates as expected, Ted Cruz will be math­e­mat­i­cally elim­i­nated from win­ning the nom­i­na­tion out­right. [snip]

The estab­lish­ment wants a con­tested con­ven­tion. This is a fact that is beyond dis­pute. The estab­lish­ment does not want Don­ald Trump. And it is undis­putable that the estab­lish­ment does not want Ted Cruz either. Even Ted’s most vocif­er­ous sup­port­ers’ most fer­vent argu­ment is that the estab­lish­ment hates Ted Cruz more than they hate Don­ald Trump. Go ahead, try to walk that argu­ment back, now that you know where I’m going with this.

Since the establishment’s main goal right now is to deny Trump the nom­i­na­tion, and given the solid argu­ment that they hate Cruz more than they hate Trump, why on earth would Cruz have a snowball’s chance in hell of win­ning a con­tested con­ven­tion? And, in fact, that is not even in the same galaxy of the establishment’s inten­tions. [snip]

You MUST accede that, assum­ing Don­ald Trump falls short of the 1,237 del­e­gates, there is a VERY high like­li­hood that Cruz will be cast aside once the first bal­lot is cast. In fact, the prob­a­bil­ity of Cruz being selected by a delighted, giddy estab­lish­ment deter­mined to install their own pup­pet is so small as to be indis­tin­guish­able from zero. [snip]

I’ll give Cruz the ben­e­fit of the doubt that he wants to see this thing through at least until New York. But after the New York Val­ues Vot­ers express their opin­ions, Cruz is effec­tively shut out from ever being the nom­i­nee. There is zero chance. [snip]

Either he has made some sort of deal with the estab­lish­ment to try and deny Trump the path to 1,237, or he is too naive or stu­pid to real­ize that the estab­lish­ment will NOT choose him in a con­tested con­ven­tion. Cruz is a Har­vard lawyer with advi­sors who, pre­sum­ably, can do sim­ple math. Which sce­nario is more likely?

If Cruz has made a deal with the estab­lish­ment, what does that say about Ted Cruz, the Out­sider, the Bul­let Point Con­ser­v­a­tive? He will have com­pro­mised his prin­ci­ples and his own cam­paign PLATFORM. If Cruz is being naive, what kind of Pres­i­dent will he be? But then again, he was fooled by Mitch McConnell, so there’s that. He has also enlisted Jeb Bush’s brother for his finance team, and now Jeb him­self has endorsed him. Admit this: If Jeb had come out and endorsed Trump, you’d be yelling “Estab­lish­ment!” at the top of your lungs.

Stupid, Ted Cruz supporters say they like Ted Cruz because he is anti-establishment but Ted Cruz is willingly engaged in bestial intercourse with GOP establishment animals. That’s the real Ted #CruzSexScandal!

The analysis above comes from a pro Trump website, HotGas. Now let’s hear from a Trump hater at the New York Post:

Wake up, Cruz and Kasich — the GOP convention will never nominate you

Let’s imagine for a moment that Donald Trump isn’t going to be the Republican nominee for president. There are three ways this fantasy — and it is likely nothing more than a fantasy — becomes a reality.

One is that something Trump does is just so outrageous and disgusting, it knocks him out of the race and by default Ted Cruz becomes the nominee. (You can stop laughing ruefully now; I’m sure we all know now that’s not going to happen.)

The second is that Ted Cruz wins 80 percent of the Republican delegates going forward, passes Trump and takes it on the first ballot at the convention in July. At the moment, no one seems to believe this scenario is viable — not even the Cruz camp, which doesn’t bother talking it up.

The third is that Trump doesn’t secure enough delegates to win it on the first ballot and the GOP rises up on subsequent ballots to take it away from him and give the nomination to someone else.

This is possible. Indeed, it’s exactly what Cruz and John Kasich — the candidate with no shot who is staying in even though he won as many delegates on Tuesday night as I did — are counting on to propel them to the nomination.

They shouldn’t be. At all. In fact, they might as well write their own concession speeches right now. [snip]

This is the scenario Cruz and Kasich are hoping for. And in hoping for it, they are talking themselves into political oblivion.

Look, fellas: If Trump doesn’t get enough delegates to win, why would a GOP let entirely loose from primary and caucus results and able to choose anyone as its nominee turn to two candidates who received even fewer delegates than Trump did?

Would this panicked GOP look at Potential Nominee Cruz and foresee a shift in its fortunes? Why would it? Cruz has yet to demonstrate he has a national constituency. Alas for him, the movement he wanted to lead — conservative white people who, according to a delusional theory unsupported by evidence, didn’t turn up to vote for Mitt Romney in 2012 by the millions and cost the GOP the election — has a candidate: His name is Trump. [snip]

You can’t win the GOP nomination by losing.

Ted Cruz should stop playing for second, because if he comes in second, he’s not going to be the nominee. The only way he gets to grasp the brass ring is to beat Trump outright.

It’s a nearly insuperable challenge. But there it is.

Stupid Ted Cruz supporters can put aside the issue of whether or not Ted Cruz is hated by the establishment because he is so anti-establishment (even thought the evidence points to Ted Cruz as GOP establishment tool and Jeb Bush enabler). The bottom line stupid Ted Cruz supporters have to explain to their withered brains is why someone that ran and lost because his presumed constituency of conservative blue collar voters went to Trump, and that same Ted Cruz has no national constituency, and that same Ted Cruz has a serpentine face and little serpent teeth – why would the establishment nominate the Ted Cruz they hate and are only using to get at Donald Trump? Stupid loser Ted Cruz supporters have no answer. They’re stupid losers, dumb, as useful as a wet bag of rocks.

So, we cited a pro-Trump website, a Trump hater, now a Trump neutral (supposedly). Larry Sabato considers Trump’s path to 1237:

About a month ago, after Donald Trump won the South Carolina primary and all of its delegates, we headlined a piece “The Hour is Growing Late to Stop Trump.” Well, the hour has grown later, and we have to ask the question: Has Trump been stopped?

Certainly not. And a look ahead at the remaining contests calls into question the ability of the other candidates, Ted Cruz and John Kasich, to prevent him from winning the requisite number of delegates to clinch or come close to clinching the Republican nomination.

The magic number is 1,237 delegates, and our own rough calculations show Trump just getting over the hump with 1,239. [snip]

In Wisconsin, Trump may benefit from a Cruz-Kasich split and also may hold the advantage in a number of congressional districts that have lower percentages of college graduates and lower median incomes. We see Kasich potentially winning a couple of districts with higher median incomes that performed strongly for Romney in the 2012 GOP primary. We also handed Cruz the heavily Republican Fifth District, as he has performed better among stalwart conservatives, and the Sixth District next door.

If you want to read Sabato’s prognostications for Connecticut, Rhode Island, New York, Delaware, Pennsylvania, Indiana, West Virginia, Oregon, Washington, New Mexico, California, go ahead but we’ll save you the trouble and [spoiler alert!!!] inform you that Trump will be very happy. In Nebraska-Montana-South Dakota, small states all, [spoiler alert!!!] Ted Cruz will slither and hiss.

The Ted Cruz path to victory is covered by an avalanche of boulders from the Trump earthquake. For Stupid Ted Cruz Supporters the only gloat left in them is the Mitt Romney establishment victory via tool Ted Cruz in Utah. But, Utah is a toxic drink of salt:

Ted Cruz’s Utah Win Doesn’t Derail Donald Trump’s Delegate Momentum
Texas senator is picking up endorsements from the GOP establishment like Jeb Bush, but still faces uphill battle

WASHINGTON—The split decision from Arizona and Utah on Tuesday leaves the Republican presidential race in the same place it has been: front-runner Donald Trump with a commanding lead, and Sen. Ted Cruz and the GOP establishment in a desperate effort to stop him from clinching the nomination outright.

Mr. Trump’s Arizona primary victory led to unlikely support Wednesday for Mr. Cruz, who won the Utah caucuses. The Texas senator, who built his campaign around how much he is hated by the Washington establishment, on Wednesday was endorsed by former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush and the Club for Growth, the antitax organization that had never before endorsed a presidential candidate.

“For the sake of our party and country, we must move to overcome the divisiveness and vulgarity Donald Trump has brought into the political arena, or we will certainly lose our chance to defeat the Democratic nominee and reverse President [Barack] Obama’s failed policies,” Mr. Bush said in his endorsement of Mr. Cruz.

Other prominent GOP activists, such as commentator Erick Erickson, have called on Republicans like Mr. Walker and Sens. Marco Rubio of Florida and Ben Sasse of Nebraska to coalesce behind Mr. Cruz as the party’s last hope to stop Mr. Trump.

Even if they do so this week, it may be too late.

Mr. Walker, whose state will hold its primary on April 5, said in a radio interview aired Wednesday that he is likely to endorse next week, “when it will have maximum impact.”

When he ended his campaign in September, Mr. Walker called on remaining candidates to coalesce to block Mr. Trump. [snip]

Despite Mr. Cruz’s continued insistence that he has a credible path to win 1,237 delegates before the convention, that scenario becomes less likely with each succeeding contest. [snip]

He must win 85% of the outstanding delegates—a task akin to winning a division in Major League Baseball after being 25 games out of first place on Labor Day—when there are only about 30 games left in the season.

To get to a contested convention, Mr. Cruz must win coming contests in Wisconsin—where each of the state’s eight congressional districts is winner-take-all—and perform well in the late-April primaries in the Northeast, Mr. Trump’s backyard.

The contests after Wisconsin are not on friendly terrain for Mr. Cruz. Mr. Trump remains popular among New York Republicans who vote April 19, and while competing in Iowa’s caucuses, Mr. Cruz mocked Mr. Trump’s “New York values.”

All the Lyin’ Ted Cruz machinations will get him no higher than a serpent’s belly on the ground. Trump will beat Ted Cruz on the beaches. Trump will beat Ted Cruz in the air. Trump will beat Ted Cruz on the ground. Trump will beat Ted Cruz in a group. Trump will beat Ted Cruz one-on-one:

Poll: Trump beats both foes head-to-head

The results indicate that unifying Republican opposition to Donald Trump would be very hard.

Trump pretty much won the GOP nomination in South Carolina. That does not mean that plotters won’t plot.

Those that want to stop the Trump nomination will continue to plot. There will be strange bedfellows. Sleazy Ted Cruz the phony “consistent conservative” will copulate with the GOP establishment and try to give birth to the ugliest baby since Barack Obama in 2008. That is the real Ted #CruzSexScandal.

Share

When Firewalls Burn: #NVDemsCaucus And South Carolina GOP Primary

Update: Ted Cruz has a South Carolina firewall:

What if the firewall crumbles?

That’s the worry of a growing number of people close to Ted Cruz’s campaign, who are privately beginning to fear that a big loss in South Carolina to Donald Trump on Saturday could signal more defeats to come in the so-called SEC states that are the lynchpin of Cruz’s strategy.

“If they’re pretty far back from Trump and they can’t get southern conservative evangelicals in South Carolina, I do think they’re probably going to have a hard time elsewhere,” said Erick Erickson, a conservative writer in touch with Cruz’s team. “I sense a real fear from people that if Trump blows everybody out of the water in South Carolina, that he is suddenly unstoppable.“

South Carolina is not a Trump “firewall” because Trump has a diverse coalition. A Trump loss in South Carolina would be a big blow never-the-less. It would be a weakness and a sign of a long slog to come. Granted, by all logic Donald Trump should lose South Carolina. Trump has been, in one short week, attacked by the Pope, by Big Media and the entire political establishment – then responded with a lethal attack on some of the delusions about George W. Bush the Republican establishment holds most dear.

But South Carolina is a Cruz “firewall” not a Trump must win. If Trump beats Cruz in South Carolina, we believe Cruz will have to get out of the race even though we also believe foolish Cruz will decide to stick with his loser campaign. Of course, Cruz could win. Cruz once thought he would would win South Carolina:

Cruz’s team once envisioned South Carolina as a rubber match between Trump, the New Hampshire victor, and Cruz, the Iowa winner. Now, it’s being read as an omen of what’s to come in 10 days’ time when Southern states vote on Super Tuesday.

Cruz once called the God-fearing, gun-toting SEC states that vote then on March 1 his “firewall,” but polls show Trump leading in South Carolina, and a dominant performance Saturday would show that Cruz has not been able to sufficiently consolidate the evangelical base that he needs to win down the road in places like Tennessee and Georgia.

Cruz could win if evangelicals come out in massive numbers and vote in massive numbers for Cruz. Still, that would make Cruz a niche candidate and the states to come won’t have that high a proportion of evangelicals voting.

Just as Hillary Clinton required at least a ten point win in Nevada to douse the louse Bernie Sanders, Trump could use a big win because that would put the nail in the Cruz coffin:

Several people close to the campaign concede that losing South Carolina by double digits would spell serious trouble for Super Tuesday. If it’s a tighter loss, some say, it would validate the theory that Trump was susceptible to their attacks and encourage more. [snip]

“But if Trump gets 38 or 40 — and Cruz is second with 22 or something like that — it’s going to be very ominous,” the fundraiser added. [snip]

It is hard to overstate the importance of March 1 to Cruz’s self-professed path to victory — he has made the date, which will award more delegates than any other day in the Republican calendar, the cornerstone of his strategy.

Allies tell CNN Cruz is hoping to win 60% of the delegates there.

The next state to vote in the GOP nomination race is Nevada. Trump has a large lead there already. Cruz has a lot of firewalls that might go up in a Glenn Beck blaze:

Assuming Cruz does hold off Rubio, though, the key will be how large the margin of loss is to Trump, who also holds a large lead in Nevada.

“If Trump wins and we’re second, the SEC primary becomes a 50/50 scenario,” said one Cruz insider. “It’s our territory, but he’ll have the momentum.”

Firewalls will burn tonight. Whose?

Rubio had a 3-2-1 strategy (come in 3 in Iowa, 2 in NH, 1 in South Carolina). Cruz had a #1 in South Carolina firewall too. Trump has a win-win-win strategy. Not all three men can be #1.

Trump has almost always led by a great deal in South Carolina polls. Cruz had a firewall that might or might not burn down tonight and set a-blaze other firewalls on March 1. Marco Rubio needs to be something other than the perpetual bronze medal winner somewhere. Somethings gonna burn.

There will be losers as firewalls burn:

GOP elders want poorly performing candidates to quit

South Carolina could reshape the 2016 contest, with donor dollars shifting to a single Trump-Cruz alternative.

The South Carolina primary is poised to dramatically alter the Republican nomination contest, winnowing and clarifying the largest and most rambunctious GOP field in decades.

Many in the party’s upper echelons have grown impatient with their splintered field of center-right, mainstream contenders and say they intend to put pressure on whichever candidate falls short of third place on Saturday night to quit. [snip]

“South Carolina will reshape the race,” said Scott Reed, the chief political strategist at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. [snip]

After disappointing showings in Iowa and New Hampshire, Jeb Bush has staked his campaign on South Carolina, dispatching his brother and mother, former First Lady Barbara Bush, to jog voters’ fond memories of Bushes past. Despite the family’s efforts, however, most polls in recent days have shown Bush hovering in single digits, far behind rival Marco Rubio.

The GOP establishment wants to stop Trump. Stop Trump is the goal:

If Bush bows out, a large and wealthy set of establishment-minded donors will be free to throw their support elsewhere. The former governor has tapped into his family’s loyal political network to amass over $120 million in contributions, and many Republicans say they think Rubio would be able to secure the backing of most of those donors, many of whom are eager for the party to unite behind a single contender to combat Trump and Cruz.

“The donor community is desperate to get someone out to focus on stopping Trump,” said former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, who won the South Carolina primary in 2012.

Rubio backers also hope that a smaller GOP field will bring party veteran Mitt Romney off the sidelines with an endorsement. Those close to Romney say he’s anxious to defeat Trump and Cruz – and that a Bush exit could nudge him closer to blessing Rubio. [snip]

South Carolina may transform the contest in other ways. Some in the Republican establishment worry that, following his runaway performance in New Hampshire, a lopsided Trump win would create an unmistakable sense of momentum heading into Nevada and the Super Tuesday states that vote on March 1. Most South Carolina surveys show Trump holding leads of anywhere from 15 to 20 percent.

“I think it would make him very difficult to stop, especially if he wins by a large margin, which is what the polls are indicating,” said McCain, the 2008 GOP nominee. “To state the obvious, if he wins, it’s significant.”

The firewalls are burning. A Trump victory in South Carolina would burn the biggest firewall of all:

How a Trump win in South Carolina could tear the GOP apart

For political junkies, the past week has been among the most astonishing in a political season already jam-packed with astonishing weeks.

In last Saturday’s GOP debate in South Carolina, Donald Trump took his disruptive tactics to a whole new level, laying into Jeb Bush and accusing his brother, former President George W. Bush, not just of invading Iraq for no good reason and ineptly managing the occupation of the country, but of intentionally lying to justify the war in the first place. In Trump’s telling, Saddam Hussein didn’t possess weapons of mass destruction, Dubya knew it, and he hyped the threat to justify a war he wanted to initiate for unrelated reasons. That’s long been a trope of far-left conspiracy theorists and dismissed by mainstream Democrats and Republicans alike. Yet there was the frontrunner for the Republican presidential nomination leveling that charge from center stage of a nationally televised GOP debate.

Conservative pundits understood instantly the gravity of what they were witnessing. If a Republican candidate for president could win a primary in a deeply conservative Southern state after such an outburst, it would be the strongest evidence yet that the conservative movement had lost control of the party — that a significant bloc of its voters is ready and willing to repudiate the movement and the ideas that have defined it for several decades.

That’s what’s going to be tested this Saturday in South Carolina. A dominating victory by Trump, which most polls are predicting, will not only strongly indicate that he’s likely either to win the nomination or prevent the nomination of anyone else prior to the GOP convention this summer. It will also portend a tumultuous future for the Republican Party, regardless of who ends up as the nominee in 2016. A party with such a large bloc of voters who diverge so sharply from the party’s organizing ideology is either a party that will need to significantly change its ideological direction — or one on the verge of breaking apart.

Whether this is in fact what’s in store for the Republican Party will be clarified as never before once the results in South Carolina roll in.

The biggest firewall to burn tonight is the GOP establishment firewall. If Trump wins South Carolina Trump will likely win the nomination and control of the Republican Party. The GOP establishment is burning, set ablaze by the voters, mostly the white working class, tired of the lies and corruption of the entire national political establishment:

The white working-class base of the party has been devastated by stagnating wages, globalization and de-industrialization, and various forms of social and cultural breakdown. And through it all the Republican Party has offered little beyond tax cuts for the wealthy and stern, moralistic reprimands (“Stop whining and get a job!”). That’s hardly a strategy inclined to generate long-term loyalty and enthusiasm for the party.

But that’s just the beginning.

Judged by any objective standard, the Republican Party’s record of governance over the past 16 years has been dismal. The largest and deadliest terrorist attack in American history took place with a Republican in the White House. He started two wars in response. The first failed for years to achieve its most immediate goal (capturing or killing Osama bin Laden) and dragged on for well over a decade, producing a deeply muddled outcome.

The second war was far more controversial. It failed to turn up the weapons that were the proximal cause of the conflict; sparked an insurgency that killed and maimed thousands of American soldiers; killed, maimed and displaced hundreds of thousands of Iraqis; and spawned groups (al Qaeda in Iraq, which later became the Islamic State and its affiliates) that now radiate destabilizing violence throughout the Middle East, North Africa, and South Asia, with carnage occasionally reaching as far as France and California.

Meanwhile, the same Republican president pushed through two massive tax cuts that mostly benefited the wealthy, inspired only modest economic growth, and did little to buoy middle-class wages. He then presided over the most severe economic crisis and collapse in seven decades.

That’s an awful lot to answer for. But not even this record filled with ample doses of bad luck, missteps, and outright mistakes gets at the deepest source of present-day dissent within the GOP — which is the response of the party and its conservative-movement cheerleaders to these mistakes and missteps.

We typically think of ideology as a web of policies and the arguments that are used to justify them. But ideologies can also shape tactics. And the fact is that for much of the past generation the GOP has been in the grip of a tactical ideology of willful stubbornness. [snip]

Which brings us back to Trump.

What voters hear when he rails against the stupidity of the country’s political leadership, the incompetence of George W. Bush, and what he likes to call the complete disaster of American policy in Iraq and the broader Middle East is a man willing both to face the ugly truth that they themselves perceive and to call out those who refuse to acknowledge it. If he gets a little carried away in countenancing some unsavory conspiracy theories, that’s a forgivable offense. Certainly more forgivable than Republicans failing to take even the least bit of responsibility for what they’ve done, and failed to do, while holding positions of power.

On Saturday night in South Carolina, we’ll see how many Republican voters are willing to give Donald Trump the benefit of the doubt — all for the sake of telling the party’s leadership just how unwilling they are to continue extending the same benefit to them.

Firewalls will burn today. It is not just political campaigns set ablaze. Today, the political establishment faces the Götterdämmerung conflagration all tyrants fear.

———————–

Today and/or tonight, firewalls will burn. We don’t know which firewalls will burn. But today, firewalls burn.

The biggest and earliest firewall that might Bern? Hillary Clinton’s Nevada firewall.

Hillary2016 must win a resounding victory of ten points or more if she is to keep her Nevada firewall pristine, not charred. If Hillary2016 loses in Nevada, a state where her campaign bragged of its lead for so long, then it will be the first of burnt firewalls and Hillary2016 will resemble bombed out post war European cities.

If we see a Bernt Hillary2016 firewall in Nevada, Bernie Sanders will be able to survive the earlier primaries which should be Hillary2016 victories. If the Hillary2016 Nevada firewall Berns down Bernie Sanders will have his great comeback in the Western primaries and caucuses towards the end of the nomination process.

If Nevada Berns, there will be few credible excuses. The dumb “analysis” that suggests Hillary2016 will be saved by the odious Harry Reid, just don’t know what they are talking about. Harry Reid in 2008 helped destroy Hillary and in 2016 Harry Reid is up to his same tricks.

If Nevada Berns, there will be zero credible excuses for the failure. Hillary2016 campaign manager Robbie Mook grew up in Vermont so he understands the Vermont senator. Also, Robbie Mook was the 2008 Hillary state director in Nevada.

If the firewall holds without a singe on it, then Hillary2016 will be back on track. But an Iowa style “victory” will only serve to fire up the Jacobins of the Bernie cinder campaign.

If the Nevada firewall Berns today, the spiritless Mook “data driven” campaign will be in flames. Mook’s head and the hapless Jennifer Palmieri’s head will have to be removed. If the Nevada firewall Berns today, the long slough for Hillary2016 will begin. It will be a long slough to defeat.

We will update with the Republican contest in South Carolina and the burning firewalls there, before the voting ends at 7:00 p.m.

Share

OMG!!! It’s Over For Trump!!! – Plus, An @TedCruz Prediction

Update: First one poll, then another. It’s more more over for Trump.

According to a new CNN/ORC poll out Tuesday, Trump has the support of 38 percent of likely Republican primary voters in South Carolina, with Texas Sen. Ted Cruz well behind him with 22 percent. Florida Sen. Marco Rubio has 14 percent and Former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush has 10 percent. Retired neurosurgeon Ben Carson has 6 percent and Ohio Gov. John Kasich is at 4 percent.

Zombie Trump. He will not die. No matter what the establishment does. He will not die. Zombie Trump.

——————————-

Donald J. Trump has become Jeb Bush!!! Well, kinda, sorta, not really. If you need a laugh, these days before South Carolina votes (for GOP) and Nevada votes (Hillary v. Bernie) we’ve got a stupendous “It’s over for Trump” bit of news for you:

Humiliation: JebBush.com redirects to Trump’s official website [snip]

Presidential campaigns typically buy up lots of domain names related to their candidates before those candidates officially announce their intention to run. The reason they do this is obvious: They don’t want rivals or random Internet trolls to buy up the domains and use them to create parody websites that make their candidates look ridiculous.

Remarkably, it seems the Bush campaign never bothered to buy up JebBush.com.

Like Hillary2016, Jeb2016 is not a campaign, it is an embarrassment:

How badly is Bush getting owned in this primary? JebBush.com goes to DonaldJTrump.com.

Poor Jeb Bush.

This Republican primary was supposed to be his to lose. Instead, he’s getting owned by Donald Trump.

How badly is Trump owning Bush?

So badly that JebBush.com leads to Trump’s site instead. [snip]

At the time, it just seemed like a characteristic Jeb bumble: How, after immigration reform activists snapped up TedCruz.com and CarlyFiorina.org became a testament to the layoffs Fiorina ordered at Hewlett-Packard, could Bush’s people not lock up JebBush.com? But after the Iowa caucuses and New Hampshire primary, Jeb Bush and his campaign have become objects of a weird kind of pity.

Bush told a New Hampshire audience to “please clap” after he delivered a line; it was a joke, but also kind of wasn’t. A video captured him lighting up with joy when a voter tells him, “You might swing my vote,” then coming over to envelop the poor voter in a hug. (The video was uploaded to YouTube with the title “Jeb hug — sad times.”)

It’s over for Trump!!! If voters confuse Trump for Jeb even for a second, Trump will never recover. Jeb has finally found a way to destroy Trump! Brilliant move by Jeb!!!!!!!!!!!!

Jeb for months has conveyed an image as a first class idiot, a Fredo, a dunce, the doofus on the beach that watches He-Man Trump walk by and throw sand in his face, the idiot loser son that needs mommy to kiss his boo-boo paper cuts, the dried out twig on the tree, the bird born without feathers, the broken egg shell in the carton, the soaked wet book with all the pages lumped together, the fat kid sent to the fat farm by angry parents who goes dewy eyed every time he sees a donut, the inbred royal brat outwitted by an ice cream cone, a one blade scissors, a two legged stool, a stopped up toilet. . . . But that was just a ploy.

Jeb Bush played possum. He prepared a trap for Trump. Jeb’s plan was to make himself such a loser that just seeing Jeb next to The Donald would finish off the mighty Trump. Jeb became the Pigpen to Charlie Brown. Now Trump has fallen into the crafty trap.



Well, maybe not. The truth is Jeb Bush is a loser and Donald Trump is a winner.

Just say Trump is a winner. Need another laugh bought and paid for by Donald J. Trump? Trump trumps again:

Trump Schedules Competing MSNBC Town Hall Opposite Cruz, Rubio CNN Town Hall

In yet another aggressive move that will thrill Trump supporters, late Tuesday morning, Jesse Rodriguez, Senior Producer of MSNBC’s “Morning Joe,” announced a town hall event with Republican frontrunner Donald Trump that will take place Wednesday night at 8 p.m. The night will be hosted by Joe Scarborough and Mika Brzezinski. The MSNBC town hall will compete directly with CNN’s long-schedule town hall with Trump’s two closest competitors, Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX)and Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL).

On Trump’s part, the competing town hall is obviously yet another one of The Donald’s ruthlessly effective political moves to infuriate his competitors and smother their message. [snip]

As far as Trump, unless an angry CNN now rescinds its offer, just days before voting begins in South Carolina, he will enjoy a town hall two-fer. Along with John Kasich and Jeb Bush, Trump is scheduled to appear at a Thursday night CNN town hall event.

If MSNBC will now put up a CNN-style countdown clock for the Trump town hall, my life will be complete.

UPDATE: My life is complete.

Trump trumps the repulsive MSNBC. That’s how you do it. Get a dog to eat a dog. [Apologies to all, we do not mean to impugn our furry friends, it’s just a conventional expression and we correct ourselves not out of political correctness but because dogs are so much better than the Big Media animals, and we don’t want anyone to confuse adorable pets with the vermin of Big Media.]

Trump does not go to MSNBC, as we have angrily denounced before, out of weakness. Trump goes to MSNBC in triumph, not defeat. Trump goes on CNN, then thwarts CNN by using the reptiles at MSNBC to block Cruz/Rubio on CNN. How smart is this guy?

Yesterday, we updated a new poll from South Carolina. Our comment is what we now address:

The question is “did Donald J. Trump blow himself up with his monumental gamble of attacking George W. Bush and the Iraq War in a state where GWB is at 80% popularity and a state which has many veterans?” [snip]

If the GOP establishment, Big Media, and the political establishment in its entirety cannot stop Trump in South Carolina now, then where, when? If Trump can make it there, Trump can make it anywhere… it’s up to you… South Carolina.

If Trump cannot be beaten now, in South Carolina, when everything is going the establishment’s way and will never be better for the establishment – – – – – then when can they ever stop Trump? WHEN??? WHERE???

If Trump wins in South Carolina. . . .

Here’s our Ted Cruz prediction: If Trump wins South Carolina Ted Cruz will leave the race.

Well, maybe that’s just our best advice for Ted Cruz.

Ted Cruz, for his own good should leave the race if Trump wins in South Carolina. Why?

It won’t get better for Ted Cruz if Trump wins in South Carolina. South Carolina is an open primary and there are more open primaries to come and many of them on Super Tuesday March 1. Which means Trump will win big on Super Tuesday if Trump wins South Carolina.

Trump is already way ahead in many Super Tuesday states but his lead will expand like Christie’s belly if Trump wins South Carolina. Once Trump dispatches Cruz and Carson he will be the only outsider left to fight the divided establishment. Then Trump can finish off Rubio. Once Rubio is gone, Jeb Bush will take his anti-Rubio personal vendetta and go home to mommy. For now, Trump’s #1 target is Cruz and if Trump wins South Carolina, Super Tuesday will be a romp for Trump.

That’s not the worst of it for Cruz. On Super Tuesday, Texas will vote. If Cruz loses in Texas, he is not only finished in the 2016 primary fight for president. If Ted Cruz loses in Texas on Super Tuesday March 1, he will be humiliated in Texas. Once the Cruz blood is in the water, Cruz will be bled to death by his opponents in Texas and in the U.S. Senate. Cruz will be primaried when he runs for reelection. His career will possibly be over.

Our advice to Ted Cruz: If Donald Trump wins South Carolina, get out and endorse Trump immediately. Save yourself. Get back on Trump’s good side.

It’s almost over for Trump. He will soon be the nominee.

Share