* * * * * *

Remember when we Democrats used to wear those cute buttons that said things like “This is not a Patriot Act”? We wore those to protest George W. Bush and the passage of the Patriot Act. Many of our compatriots at the time demonstrated passionately against the Patriot Act. We Democrats were angry and protested on issues such as privacy rights. Democratic leaders denounced George W. Bush and the Republicans and their “tyrannies”. Oh how we Democrats protested and stomped our feet and swore never ending hatred of what we denounced as the improperly named “Patriot Act”.

Yesterday, by a voice vote (which requires unanimous consent, meaning not a single Dimocrat objected to approve without having to record the vote so Senators could be held accountable) the overwhelmingly Dimocratic U.S. Senate voted to extend the Patriot Act.

In agreeing to pass the bill, Senate Democrats retreated from adding new privacy protections to the USA Patriot Act. The Senate approved the bill on a voice vote with no debate. It now goes to the House.

We must have missed the outraged protests from organizations such as Move-On and the defense bar of lawyers who yelled when it was Republicans passing the Patriot Act. Next time anyone, including Hillary supporters, says we must vote for those that are “with us” on the issues, tell them to stick it up their Patriot Act.

* * * * * *

Governor David Paterson of New York announced today he will not run for election. Barack Obama and Senator 2×4 Schumer as well as dynast Andrew Cuomo wanted to remove Paterson. Paterson resisted. The New York Times was enlisted in the effort to remove Paterson. The publisher of the New York Times was reputed to have had a sexual affair with Caroline Kennedy so it was easy to enlist the establishment rag sheet to attack Paterson. The gullible will believe that the questions the New York Times raised about Paterson are what finished Paterson off. But Paterson was the victim of a hit job by people such as racist Senator Chuck Schumer. There is not one clean person in any of this. Paterson deserves a full measure of justice if allegations against him are true. But anyone who believes the New York Times performed “investigative journalism” is a fool. This was a hit job, Chicago style. Another Obama sex story hit.

We won’t even go into the Charlie Rangel corruptions because they are too many and too varied. The House Ethics committee puts Pelosi in a bind now that Rangel has been in violation of ethics rules. “The AP reported that Rangel knowingly accepted Caribbean trips in violation of House rules forbidding hidden financing by corporations.” The Culture of Corruption, New York style continues to be exposed, even as it flourishes.

* * * * * *

Let’s take a few moments today to laugh, mock, and fully deride Gay fools. Here at Big Pink we support civil rights for Gay-Americans. We wrote many, many articles warning Gay Americans about Barack Obama. But, just as with Black people and White people, some Gay people are the lowest of the low. We won’t “mince” our words in politically correct language. We will denounce, mock, totally spew disgust at Gay fools. And there are many Gay fools (just as their are many straight fools, black fools, white fools and fools everywhere. There are even “April Fools” every month of the year.). We won’t conduct a therapy session for Gay fools here, we intend to slap them awake.

We wrote “Women, Gays, Jews: Wake Up!” in June 2009. We quoted James Pietrangelo II, a Gay man who is no fool. Pietrangelo is worthy of respect, not only as a human being (everyone deserves that level of respect, even fools and gay fools) but because he understands the problem and is not afraid to tell the truth to Gay fools (via Time magazine):

“He’s a coward, a bigot and a pathological liar,” Pietrangelo said in an interview with TIME shortly after the high court declined to hear his appeal. “This is a guy who spent more time picking out his dog, Bo, and playing with him on the White House lawn than he has working for equality for gay people,” he added. “If there were millions of black people as second-class citizens, or millions of Jews or Irish, he would have acted immediately” upon taking office to begin working to lift “Don’t ask, don’t tell.” Pietrangelo fought in Iraq in 1991 as an infantryman, and returned as a JAG officer for the second Iraq War, before being booted out in 2004 for declaring he was gay as he was readying for a third combat tour. He was representing himself before the high court.

In the same article we wrote this about the betrayal of Gay Americans by the Gay “leadership”:

Gay-Americans are the targets of a particular hatred from Obama. That hatred is sometimes passive-aggressive. That hatred is sometimes disguised with sweet words. That hatred is sometimes overt. Because the hatred at times has been so overt Gay-Americans are the among the first to wake up from their Hopium addled state.

Gay-Americans have proven time and time again they are mostly not fools. But the Gay “leadership” is craven, foolish, liars, and quislings, ready to betray their own to fellate Barack Obama. Recently the disgusting Gay “leadership” swooned about Obama’s latest sweet words in public about gay rights, especially those at the State of the Union. We wrote:

Last night Obama delivered a degenerate campaign speech. Consider the idiot Gay-Americans who voted for Obama and continue to give the boob and his Dimocrats money. When it is to squeeze money from Gay-Americans Obama employs direct, declarative language: “I will end ‘don’t ask, don’t tell’.”

Last night however, Gay-Americans got this campaign promise kinda, sorta: “This year I will work with Congress and our military to finally repeal the law that denies gay Americans the right to serve the country they love because of who they are.”

That was it. Gay-Americans who foolishly trust Obama to actually repeal the law they hate, better get to parsing Obama’s words. Obama is not going to do anything you Gay fools. Obama, one year in, will possibly “work” with Congress/military to, in a thousand years, repeal the “don’t ask, don’t tell” law. “Work” to Obama means the speech he gave last night. His efforts are already over. Keep giving him money you fools.

Gay people who trust Obama are fools deserving of all the misery he delivers. Straight people who trust Obama are fools deserving of all the misery he delivers. Ditto, black people, ditto white people, ditto all colors of people and all mixtures of people. All genders, all ages, all religions, all political affiliations, all geographies – you are fools deserving of all the misery delivered to you by Obama if you trust Obama.

Obama simply cannot be trusted. Obama cannot be trusted on any issue. Obama cannot be trusted by his friends. Obama cannot be trusted by his enemies. Obama cannot be trusted.

Gay fools yesterday heard General James Conway tell the Senate Armed Services Committee “that he disagreed with Obama’s plan to repeal the ban.” The General is not alone:

The chiefs of the US Army and Air Force also expressed doubts about lifting the ban at congressional hearings this week, saying they were concerned about putting the military under further strain in the midst of two wars.

But Conway went further, making it clear he opposed lifting the ban that requires gay service members to keep quiet about their sexual orientation or face expulsion from the military.

Gay fools will pray to Gay hater Barack Obama and sing “Someday My Prince Will Come” or the plaintive gay hopes anthem “Somewhere” from West Side Story. Gay fools will have plenty of time to sing because Obama is not going to do anything for them.

* * * * * *

Get out the garbage day:

In a twofer, both Washington Post courtesan Sally Quinn and White House Social Secretary Desiree Rogers, are out. Chicago Rogers’ main accomplishments were lavish parties paid for by taxpayers to highlight Michelle Obama’s arms.

Sally Quinn’s column of finger bowls will no longer be printed in the Washington Post but will be pixeled online. Quinn holds a special place here at Big Pink and we have discussed her many many many times.

Obama loving Newsweek lost $28.1 million last year. The Obama love does not sell – at any price. Newsweek’s troubles might be an one time accounting problem, after all, the nation’s bird cages still need papering.

* * * * * *

The Obama summit publicity stunt bombed yesterday. The next failure will be the reconciliation bluff. The Republicans did well substantively and Obama and the Dimocrats did not move the issue forward. Americans are disgusted with the Obama scam. The more time Obama wastes on pushing his scam, the less time to concentrate on the real issue – the economy and jobs. But that is the point isn’t it?

Obama will focus on pushing his health scam because he does not know what to do about the economy and how to bring back jobs. That’s why Obama distracts. Distraction is the flim-flam man’s stock in trade. “Watch the birdee!’ fools, while Obama picks your pockets.

This Friday, while fools watch the colorful birdee, unemployment continues to climb, jobless claims rise, and Obama continues to distract.

For now the job is to remain organized and reach out to as many rank and file Democrats (the innocent dupes who voted for the “D” not necessarily the “O”) as are in our networks. We also must continue to encourage and expand the network of Hillary supporter blogs that did not exist when Big Pink was all alone. And, more than follow and react to the day’s events we must keep the history of what happened in the long 2008 election cycle alive. We must put that history into context and articulate the intellectual reasoning of what and why we fight.

Yesterday we quoted the reprehensible and worldview enemy, Katha Pollit. Pollit wrote an unscrupulous defense of Barack Obama and employed the “he’s doing the best he can” defense we discussed on February 8, with the additional “it’s the best anyone (including Hillary Clinton) can do” corollary defense (along with a surrender-to-sexism-and-misogyny ploy masked as a fake feminism fur wrapped in deception).

Today we will address, not the historic, demographic coalition destroying Mistake In ‘08, but Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama. Let’s start with the, hated by Big Media and Hopium guzzlers, advertisement that so effectively shattered the establishment myth that Obama was ready to run anything bigger than a 711 convenience store.

After more than a year watching Obama perform his publicity stunts starting with the bungled oath of office on Day 1, the 3:00 A.M. advertisement rings truer than ever. But the Katha Pollits and the Left Talkers and assorted deceivers want to pretend that Obama and Hillary are the same and that a President Hillary Clinton would be, in their Hopium Hallucinations, as bowing and corrupt and incompetent as Barack Obama proves to be every day.

Every day proves that Barack Obama either lied to the American public about what he would do and how he would do it – or else his world view is so warped and distorted that he is forced to backtrack on every fake promise whether it is the uniter-not-divider nonsense, the never-gonna-happen end of Guantanamo/Gay Marriage Ban/Don’t Ask Don’t Tell/Health care reform/Immigration reform/Cap and Trade/Financial Reform/Electoral transformation and the receding oceans.

So obvious are Barack Obama’s faults that former fluffers are scouring the employment advertisements in order to find Boob Barack a job he is better suited for. We do not think he is suited to run a low traffic 711 convenience store, for the very reasons former Obama fluffers search for a new job for the Mess-iah. Jeffrey Rosen thinks Obama is suited to a job at the Supreme Court, though we are sure that the same non-accomplishment and self-promotion and non-existent work habits would make him a disaster at any job that requires brains and hard work. Rosen:

“He’s too detached and cerebral. Too deferential to Congress. Too willing to compromise. And he’s too much of a law professor and not enough of a commander in chief, as Sarah Palin recently admonished.” [snip]

Though Obama has struggled to find his footing in the White House, his education, temperament and experience make him ideally suited to lead the liberal wing of the court, especially at a time when a narrow conservative majority seems increasingly intent on challenging progressive economic reforms for the first time since the New Deal. Obama is clearly eager to take on the four truly conservative justices — Samuel Alito, John Roberts, Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas — as his State of the Union smackdown suggests. But as president, he’s constrained by that pesky separation of powers. So what better way to engage the fight than to join the bench?

Rosen must be smoking Hopium because otherwise he would know that Obama on the Supreme Court would do what Obama always does – give others the hard work, orchestrate publicity stunts for himself and only himself, and do whatever it takes to become rich personally and avoid fighting those who might benefit him. In short, Barack Obama on the high court would be the ventriloquist dummy for whatever majority exists at the moment. Far from fighting Scalia, Roberts, Alito, or Thomas, Barack Obama would bow to power and prove once again that he simply cannot be trusted – by anyone – friend or foe.

Rosen even has a dream scenario for getting Obama out of 1600 Pennsylvania:

“It would be unusual, but not difficult, for Obama to get himself on the Supreme Court. He could nominate himself to replace John Paul Stevens, for example, or he could gamble and promise Hillary Rodham Clinton that he won’t run for reelection in 2012 in exchange for a pledge of appointment to the next vacancy.”

For those that need translation from the lofty language of D.C. elites, Rosen is very politely saying “get out” to Barack Obama and “forgive us and save us Hillary Clinton.” Rosen also delivers this not too polite slap, though drenched in honey: “It’s surprising but true that the least successful presidents are often the most judicious, while the most successful justices are the most pragmatic.” That’s Rosen’s elite way of saying “Barack, you are a loser.”

Rosen is not alone in politely stating that Obama is a Boob and Hillary is desperately needed by America if we are to survive as a recognizable nation and world power. Eleanor Clift also recognizes the differences between President Hillary Clinton and the current boob:

“Disillusioned Democrats concluded Obama spent too much time chasing bipartisanship, and the yearlong horse trading and backroom dealmaking squandered the mandate he had from the voters. The fractious Democratic majority would only have acted on its own if Obama had cracked the whip. But he signaled early on that he could be rolled when he ceded too much power to Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid in putting together the stimulus bill.

If Hillary had been elected, would she have done things differently? Having been burned once with health-care reform, she probably would have approached it more gingerly, and she wouldn’t have felt indebted to Kennedy. Those who know her say she would never have given up that much control to Congress, not so much for ideological or philosophical reasons, but simply because she’s a more controlling personality than Obama. And she certainly wouldn’t have wasted any time seeking bipartisanship. She would have accepted today’s polarizing politics as a fact of life, something to be conquered, not changed.”

Hillary Clinton is a fighter who has over the years worked to reach common ground even with the most hate filled of Hillary haters. Hillary does try to reach common ground, but Hillary will also be able and willing to fight. Hillary will fight, even the scoundrels who run the Senate and the House. That’s why the Democratic establishment went after Hillary, in secret, with a 2×4 and made sure Obama was gifted the nomination. Now the Dimocratic establishment sees the loss of elections and the loss of their big offices and perks and they know only Hillary can save them. But Hillary won’t save them now. They must die a swift political death.

One legal type African-American (we note his race to drive the Hopium guzzlers nuts) speaks on the issue of President Hillary Clinton Versus President Barack Obama:

“During the Democratic primaries, I often felt that I was on Jupiter. My fellow Democrats rejected qualities in Hillary Clinton that are essential to a successful presidency.

When Clinton claimed she had more experience than Obama, Democrats either denied this reality or said that experience does not matter. They insisted that “ideas matter more” or that “Lincoln did not have experience either.” Instead of experience, they preferred a “fresh face.”

When Clinton said she was a fighter (explicitly embracing a “Rocky” theme), Democrats turned this into a bad thing, accusing Clinton of negative campaigning. Obama said that Clinton only knew how to fight, but that he would bring together the American people. Democrats wanted a “unifier” rather than a “fighter.”

Well, I think it is time for people to evaluate their choices. From where I sit, I believe we could use a healthy dose of fighting and experience in the White House. What do you think?

On issues ranging from healthcare, anti-terrorism tactics, war, and crime, President Obama seems committed to making deals with moderates and conservatives, rather than fighting for the values of the Democratic Party. Or, is the failure to fight an official value of the Democratic Party? “

How bad is the boob in the White House? Charles Blow, an Obama fluffer, sees the problem even as he makes excuses and fans more false Hope for the weak, simpering, delusional Barack Obama:

“President Obama wanted to change Washington. It changed … for the worse. And it’s now holding his agenda hostage. The question is: How much is he willing to change himself in order to save it? [snip]

Over the same period, his job approval ratings have dropped to new lows for him, and according to a Washington Post/ABC News poll released on Thursday, the gap between those who trust him and the Democrats to handle major issues versus those who trust Republicans to do so has narrowed to nearly nothing.

And perhaps most worrisome, according to a January report from the Pew Research Center for the People and the Press, Obama’s image among the all-important independents as a “strong leader” and a president “able to get things done” took the biggest slides of all his character traits measured.”

Even the repulsive Hillary haters and Obama lovers like Ed Schultz, Keith Olbermann and Eugene Robinson begin to see Obama slip and slide and deceive and lie. Obama’s inexperience slip is showing.

Foreign leaders and prominent political analysts and publications sneer and snort at the boobery of Barack Obama:

“President Obama sounded a bit like a weary air traffic controller on Aug. 10, when he was quizzed during a three-way summit with leaders from Mexico and Canada about a promised overhaul of U.S. immigration laws.

“I’ve got a lot on my plate, and it’s very important for us to sequence these big initiatives in a way where they don’t all just crash at the same time,” the president said in response to a reporter’s question.”

Guess what Barack – they’re all crashing at the same time. You are a corrupt boob.

For the Hopium guzzlers, it is important to note that much of what we have written at Big Pink since April 2007 is what the people who knew Barack Obama the best also wrote a long time ago:

“While then Sen. Barack Obama was considering running for president, his advisor and friend David Axelrod worried in 2006 that Obama would have to toughen up for a White House campaign. Axelrod told Obama that he was thin skinned and he wondered if Obama could take the punches that would come in a presidential campagin.

“You care far too much what is written and said about you. You don’t relish combat when it becomes personal and nasty. When the largely irrelevant Alan Keyes attacked you, you flinched,” Axelrod wrote in a memo.

Axelrod’s strategy memo to Obama is revealed in “The Battle for America 2008,” a new book by Dan Balz and Haynes Johnson about the 2008 presidential campaigns.

Obama’s charmed political career came in part because of puffy, fluffy non-critical press coverage. Axelrod fretted about how Obama would do in the rough and tumble of a campaign.

‘It goes to your willingness and ability to put up with something you have never experienced on a sustained basis: criticism. At the risk of triggering the very reaction that concerns me, I don’t know if you are Muhammad Ali or Floyd Patterson when it comes to taking a punch.’”

Axelrod also predicted how the Hillary Clinton campaign would attack Obama:

“Her goal will be twofold: to suggest that she has the beef, while we offer only sizzle; and that she is not about the past but the future. But for all her advantages, she is not a healing figure. As much as she tacks to the right, she will have a hard time escaping the well-formulated perceptions of her among swing voters as a left-wing ideologue.”

Much of what Axelrod stated was self-serving and protective of his meal ticket. But as we know, Hillary always was about a long lasting and winning coalition for the entire Democratic Party – Hillary was about the future. Obama was about himself. Obama fought hard only when it was for self promotion. When Jeremiah Wright’s “God Damn America” was the headline Barack Obama said he could not abandon Wright. When Wright said Obama was a deceptive politician (”And what I think particularly angered me was his suggestion somehow that my previous denunciation of his remarks was somehow political posturing.” “I don’t think that he showed much concern for me.”) only then did Obama dump the Reverend on his ass.

“Obama, The Great Pretender, was upset because mean ol’ Wright exposed Obama’s lies and because Wright showed “disrespect” for Obama and his pretentious campaign. It wasn’t God Damn America that irked Obama. It was mean ol’ Wright not respecting the new Messiah.”

And yes it was here at Big Pink in May 5, 2007 where you read “When Sizzle Meets Fizzle” an echo of the then secret Axelrod memorandum.

Today, Barack Obama has another fake, “damn the people” publicity stunt, this one a health scam that will fool only fools desperate to be fooled. It’s not going to happen, it’s razzle-dazzle time. Fake promises from a fake man for a fake plan. Hillary Clinton supporters know a universal health care plan died in August 2008. Today is more flim-flam from a flim-flam confidence man trying to save himself, not the American people. Barack Obama must be chased out of office and his low poll numbers driven even lower.

Here at Big Pink we believe the likely scenario for a Hillary Clinton presidential run is that we chase Barack Obama out of a re-election bid (if not out of the White House before his term is up) and only then will Hillary Clinton run. The way to run Barack Obama out of a re-election bid is to make sure the Dimocrats who gifted him the nomination suffer devastating defeats and doom and death. Only then will the return of the FDR/Hillary Clinton coalition be possible and desirable. We will never return to the Democratic Party until it is purged fully from the intelligencia idiots and self-serving “leadership” which gifted Obama the nomination of the once great Democratic Party and cared not a whit that an inexperienced boob and stooge would lead to catastrophic hurt for America.

There are those who disagree with us. Some believe Hillary Clinton will indeed run against Barack Obama in 2012. They think, like us, that the Republicans will have an unprecedented victory in 2010, and then the following will happen:

“If the Democrats lose the House, they can blame Nancy, Harry and Obama. [snip]

Beyond that, Obama will likely not be able to make a Clinton comeback. Obama couldn’t get his radical agenda passed even though the Democrats controlled the Senate and House because he lacks the necessary skills to build consensus and govern. His leadership deficiencies mean that he won’t fare any better in a divided government.

In the face of such Carter-like difficulties, the Democrats will have to ask themselves: Should we place our 2012 Congressional election fate in the hands of Obama? Many will say yes – enough could well say no because . . .

(a) Obama will have not done much for them. Keep in mind that Obama was rushed into the Presidency. He didn’t have a long career of helping other Democrats around the country. [snip] Obama’s campaigning for candidates has not been successful either – just ask Governor Corzine and Senator Coakley. Indeed, moderate Democrats are telling him to stay away in 2010. All-in-all, don’t expect too many to bleed for Obama in 2012 – to the contrary, many will prefer to try to stop the bleeding they are suffering at his hands.”

And here is the important kicker which we agree with:

(b) “Hillary Will Have Better Ratings Than Obama. The Clintons are no dummies. They knew Obama would fail. So, in anticipation, Hillary simultaneously (a) burnished her foreign policy credentials as Secretary of State, and (b) distanced herself from the domestic problems of the Democrats and her approval ratings have risen accordingly – even if she had no major successes. Brilliant by comparison to Obama.

She can also correctly say: “I Told You So – he wasn’t ready and I certainly am.”

The Democrats, or enough them, won’t want to give up the White House in 2012. Carter was a one term President – Johnson not much more than that. Their only two-term President was a Clinton – and enough Democrats will urge this Clinton to run in 2012 hoping for another electoral first – a female President.”

Hillary Clinton supporters are in Winter quarters. But we continue to bust myths and drill every day. We continue to grow our numbers and expand our presence. Spring is coming. We must be ready.

We will be ready on Day 1 when the trumpet sounds.

Lifelong Democrats will find the purposeful destruction of a party disguised as the Democratic Party a difficult decision to make. We saw that in the Brown versus Coakley race in Massachusetts. Good people, even in our comments section, advocated for Martha Coakley. Good people, advocated for Martha Coakley on the grounds that she was a staunch Hillary Clinton supporter and deserved our support in her hour of need. Good people, also advocated for Martha Coakley on the grounds that she is a woman and we need more women in positions of power. Good people, also advocated for Martha Coakley on the grounds that she was closer to our issues positions than the male Republican candidate, Scott Brown. We found those arguments insufficient because the election in Massachusetts became a referendum on Barack Obama and his many scams, particularly the health scam which is a mass transfer of wealth to Big Insurance and Big PhaRma.

We supported Martha Coakley in the primary because she was a staunch Hillary Clinton supporter and the establishment power represented by the Kennedys and Nancy Pelousy opposed her. Also, in the primary, Martha Coakley made a strong argument against the Obama health scam and distanced herself from the entrenched Kennedy power that has proved so detrimental to the people of Massachusetts and the people of the United States. We recall how “green” Ted opposed energy projects because they would ruin his great views from the Hyannis Port Kennedy compound. We also recall how the Massachusetts establishment played fast and loose with the the law of senatorial appointment – “for” a special election and against gubernatorial appointment when it was convenient in 2004 and yet flip-flopping for a gubernatorial appointment when it was convenient in 2008. This was not respect for the rule of law but for the manipulation of law to convenience the establishment.

In November the Martha Coakley choice will be multiplied a hundredfold in elections for every house seat and in many gubernatorial and senate seats, not to mention myriad local elections. What are Hillary Clinton supporters to do? We still believe that in order to bring sanity to the process we must make sure that the Obama Dimocratic Party suffers devastating defeat in election after election after election.

Recently the FDL website was under attack when they saw the wisdom of a united front with Republicans to defeat the Obama health scam. FDL was denounced by Obama websites. Now some of the very “creative class” clueless see the wisdom of that strategy. Even that petty Lenninist Obama supporter at Nothing Left had this to say:

If Bernanke is defeated, it will be because around ten progressive Senators joined with most Republicans. Such Progressive – Republican alliances are pretty rare, but successfully forging one would be big news. [snip]

Over the summer, we tried this Progressive Block strategy to get a public option in the health care bill. When the moment of truth came, and the public option was stripped from the bill, the strategy collapsed.

Even the Obama enablers now see the sheer stupidity of their approach – Obama love. We saw this stupidity before Obama became the nominee in Denver. Obama had emitted a great many words against FISA but when it came time to vote Obama voted for FISA (Hillary Clinton voted against FISA). That July 2008 we wrote:

Hillary Clinton voted AGAINST FISA.

Obama supporters do not care about the issues. If Obama supporters cared about the issues they would vote for Hillary.

Obama and his supporters did not care about the issues. It was all about the election of their precious Obama. Now their precious Obama has proven to be fools gold.

The day after our FISA article, Jesse Jackson had crude but honest things to say:

Yesterday, an angry Jesse Jackson threatened to slice off Obama’s testicles. Jesse Jackson apparently does not realize that Obama has no “nuts” to cut off.

Obama is a political eunuch who will never stand his ground. Rather, Obama will cower across the aisle and submit to Republican demands.

It’s a day like yesterday that we at Big Pink know beyond dispute that we are right and the incense burners are wrong. Democrats want a Democratic President who will fight for Democratic values.

It is not only Obama who lacks testicular/ovarian fortitude. It is Obama supporters who are getting the leader they deserve. Obama supporters deluded themselves with a creature of their own creation. Now, Obama supporters lack the fortitude to do what needs to be done to rid us of this Chicago flip-flop-flim-flam contortionist.

We have known all along that:

Obama simply cannot be trusted. Obama cannot be trusted on any issue. Obama cannot be trusted by his friends. Obama cannot be trusted by his enemies. Obama cannot be trusted.

Those 5 simple sentences are now beyond dispute. Without meaningful rejection, Obama incense burners will prove themselves to be political eunuchs too.

As long as Obama “supporters” persist in supporting the unqualified, flip-flop-flim-flam Obama, any threat, even a Jesse Jackson type colorful threat will be empty.

We ended our Jeremiad with:

A New York Times commentor reminded us of Benjamin Franklin’s warning to a young nation: “Those willing to give up a little liberty for a little security deserve neither security nor liberty.”

Those who persist in supporting Obama now have no excuse. They can no longer claim they did not know. They can no longer say they have not been listening to Obama. We have warned them enough.

Now the treacheries foreshadowed by Barack Obama’s entire career come home to roost and the Obama enablers whine and scheme against the very “One” they so clamored, and so protected. The Nutroots and the establishment Dimocrats in power share the blame. We cannot support these creatures.

To these Obama enablers, issues became a “red flag” not a conviction. They waved that red flag to try to get Hillary supporters to go against reason and support the flim-flam scam man from Chicago. We rejected that “issues” red flag argument:

After trashing the FDR coalition in favor of His “new” Democratic? Party Obama is now trying to bamboozle voters he is finally realizing determine elections. But the “red” flag campaign will not work this time because we’ve been fooled once too often. Women’s rights and respect do not begin and end with the usual Democratic? red flags.

We quoted some wise words:

The point I’m trying to make is that if women really care about their reproductive rights, then they’ll start demanding more from Congress then simple appeasement. By going into the voting booth every four years and pulling the lever for a Democrat out of habit, then you aren’t doing anything more than agreeing to let the Male dominated legislature control your sex organs for another four years. If you don’t start demanding something more for your vote, if you simply give in again because the Dems are dangling that damn abortion carrot as a threat, if you don’t demand that they do something to protect your rights other than paying lip service every four years, then this cycle will continue to play out from now until eternity. But at least you can still watch Oprah.

We believe the United States needs a fully functioning Democratic Party, a fully functioning Republican Party, as well as third party efforts which seek to move both major parties. Right now, we are devoid of a Democratic Party. What we have is a mockery posing as the once great Democratic Party.

The strategy we proposed in 2008 began with Massachusetts:

A bigger than expected vote for Ed O’Reilly in Massachusetts will send terror sweats throughout the unDemocratic Party. The election is this Tuesday, September 16. Hillary Clinton won the Massachusetts primary despite Kennedy, Kerry and Patrick. Let’s make some noise in Massachusetts this Tuesday as the first step to reviving the FDR coalition truly Democratic Party.

We utterly failed with Ed O’Reilly, but Scott Brown, showed the wisdom of our strategy. We distilled our strategy for the general election in our article called Voting For Hillary Clinton Or Voting “Present”

This election cycle is about the character of the Democratic Party as well as about its core principles. [snip]

Mothers are wise. Perhaps you have heard a parent say, or you yourself have said “If your friends jump off a cliff, (or out a window) will you jump too?” All our respect for Hillary guarantees is that when Hillary speaks, we listen. But we are not lemmings, we are not automatons, we do not live in dens filled with Hopium. We make up our own minds on who gets our votes.

If there was a mechanism whereby Hillary supporters could support the eventually nominee, whether that is Hillary or Obama or anyone else, and yet also have a way to remove those who stoked the race-baiting, gay-bashing and woman-hating of the primaries; a way to reject the ugly New Democratic Party Obama wants to create - perhaps then an argument could be made for voting for the Democratic nominee no matter who she or he is.

But that mechanism does NOT exist.

Dean/Obama/Brazille/Pelosi believe they have Hillary supporters by the ovaries. Dean/Obama/Brazille/Pelosi think there is no where else to go – that women and all Democrats will have to vote Democratic, that Democrats will have no choice but to support the Democratic nominee no matter what ugly deeds, however much cowardice, however many insults and injuries they authored.

McCain was swamped when George W. Bush became a focus of national attention during the financial crisis just before the November elections in 2008. So scared and fearful were American voters that they put aside their qualms about Obama and decided to take a leap of faith, fingers crossed. They jumped from the frying pan and into the fire.

We still think our strategy is correct. But some good people question our “devastating defeat” strategy:

I know that many disaffected Democrats want to punish the party for its gutless congressional behavior over the past three years, for its kowtowing to Wall Street and the health insurance industry, and for its death-grip embrace of a cult of personality centered around a Chicago huckster. But in our zeal to punish, are we going to abandon principle?

The obvious riposte is “what principle?” How does a vote for a Dimocrat who mouths the words we like help? It’s not about “bitter, clingy” punishment as an end, it’s about punishment as a strategy.

The example cited against the “devastating defeat” strategy is that of Barbara Boxer. Barbara Boxer we are told “married into Hillary’s family.” But we remember the Barbara Boxer who announced she would support the winner of the California primary (who many believed would be Barack Obama) but when Hillary Clinton won overwhelmingly, Barbara Boxer was silent. Silent. Boxer, along with the Dimocratic establishment wanted Hillary Clinton out and Barack Obama in. How can we reward such a creature?

The argument is we must support Dimocrats who stabbed us in the back. Where does that get us? Where has that argument gotten the Nutroots?

Issues? We supposedly have overwhelming majorities of “our” people in congress and one of “our” people in the White House. What has that gotten us? Must we repeat “Obama is the Third Bush Term”? What have “our” overwhelming majorities produced? What has “our” Dimocrat in the White House produced?

Hundreds of military careers have been destroyed on his watch for no valid reason. The country has been deprived of the talents of these service members and has wasted millions of dollars on their training.

Many wonder when their president will show the same kind of concern for the constitutional rights of gay American service members as he has for enemy combatants held at Guantanamo Bay. Many wonder what the administration’s willingness to treat gay Americans as second-class citizens says to Uganda and other countries that are considering laws that would subject gays to imprisonment and even death.

Gay Americans have been among the president’s most ardent supporters. Their enthusiasm, and that of their families and friends, could be crucial in this year’s elections. The president’s action—or inaction—on Don’t Ask Don’t Tell will be noticed.

What has voting for “ours” produced? Bailouts for the nefarious schemers of Wall Street, attempted massive transfers of wealth for Big Insurance, death to real universal health care reform with secret deals with Big PhaRma, election year slush funds for Dimocratic elected officials, FISA, Guantanamo, higher war budgets, triumphant Big Media Obama enablers gliding into Obama jobs, debt and more debt, a not so secret war against “mediocre” Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton, Fox News as truly “fair and balanced” and Big Media an Obama protection mob, a never ending campaign of fakery, Bush “terrorist” policies joined to weakness, unemployment, threats to Social Security, not socialism not capitalism but opportunism, gut cuts to Medicare, Red state Massachusetts, fake deficit cuts, shrinking incomes, TelePromTer “leadership”, publicity stunts, shifting sand “deadlines” on Iran, unqualified “heckofajob Brownies”, tax cheats, a back door away from the cameras for anti-Democratic base lobbyists, vacations for the sleeveless, parties and gardens and playhouses for the Rezko financed, scams, scams and more scams, – that is what “ours” have produced.

We’ll let a bamboozled independent explain:

I am a registered Independent. I voted for Barack Obama. And for that, I am sorry.

I’m not sorry for you. I’m sorry for me. Because I voted for Obama for me, not for you. I voted for hope and change and all the intangibles that Obama was peddling in the wake of the financial crisis, Sarah Palin, Sept. 11 and all the other ills that shook our country in the last decade. I wanted something new. Something different. What I got was, I suppose, exactly what I voted for – a spin doctor. And not a very good one at that. [snip]

He is smart enough to seek counsel. I’m just outraged at the counsel he’s seeking these days. Key financial leaders who are tax cheats come immediately to mind, but as the recent terror attack made clear to me, the idea that a president of the most powerful nation in the world could think it was OK to have a Homeland Security chief with such a loose grasp of what terrorism is and how it works is troubling.

I was right there laughing when George W. Bush struggled with the names of countries around the world early in his tenure. And while my knowledge of foreign policy is limited, I thought Bush’s was lousy, too. But after Sept. 11, I saw a man with no charisma step up and fight for this country, its citizens and its freedom. Bush became a leader.

Seven years later, I am ashamed to say that I was blinded by charisma. Obama was so convincing that I stopped caring about what he knew and started getting caught up in the euphoria. Imagine having a president who came from a broken home, who had money troubles, who did grass-roots community service? A young father. The first black president. It pains me to admit I got caught up in the hoopla.

Where were “our” Dimocrats - enabling Obama.

But I believed that Obama would try to level the playing field between big business and small, between thieves and honest business people, between greed and moderation. Instead, he bailed out the most wicked and left the rest of us fail.

I watched with horror as Obama followed Bush’s lead in bailing out banks, auto makers, insurance companies, all of those companies deemed “too big to fail.” What does that mean? My small company got thrown under the bus and my savings were ravaged - perhaps Wall Street is using them for bonuses this year.

Not to mention President Obama is recklessly spending our country’s future into oblivion.

It was clear after just 90 days what a mistake I’d made. My taxes have gone up and my quality of life has gone down. Hope has given way to disgust and I see now that change is simply a euphemism for “big government.”

Where was Boxer? – and Reid, and Kerry, and Dodd, and Pelousy, and Schumer, and Feingold, and every one of “ours”? In bed with Obama looting the economy and enjoying the perks of power while hiding from and deriding “teabaggers” who expressed with vivid force the anger “we” felt. Who is on whose side?

Hence the spectacular rise of the “tea-party” movement, an alliance of ordinary people who are spooked by the huge amount of debt that is being racked up on Mr Obama’s watch. For Democrats to deride such people as “tea-baggers”, a term referring to a sexual practice involving testicles, is political stupidity of a high order.

Support these “ours”? No. “Ours” must be punished with the only currency Americans, Democrats, have left in the Obama economy -votes.

We’ll have to be very judicious, but the default position must be “devastating defeat”.

There will be tough times ahead for Hillary supporters because we will have to, once again, do what is right. We’ll have to choose sides that are as confused as Borgia Italy. We’ll have to choose sides and strategies to resurrect the Democratic Party and to benefit the nation. We’ll have to choose sides with cold, clear logic, not red flag emotion.

Whose side will you be on?

Senator Lindsey Graham stated after the hearing, “Secretary of State Clinton said we’re not locked into withdrawing, which is music to my ears and I think will be bad news for the enemy. I hope that’s the final answer.” Senator Graham’s hopes were immediately dashed.

Chip Reid of CBS News, having heard the testimony by Hillary Clinton and Bob Gates as well as the “not locked in” that Senator Graham heard, asked Robert Gibbs at a White House briefing “if senators were incorrect calling the date a ‘target’”.

After the briefing, Gibbs went to the president for clarification. Gibbs then called me to his office to relate what the president said. The president told him it IS locked in – there is no flexibility. Troops WILL start coming home in July 2011. Period. It’s etched in stone. Gibbs said he even had the chisel.

Lindsey Graham will not be happy.

Two days after a major speech and confusion reigns supreme. Obama needs to lose his job.

Instead of having the decency to resign from a job he is neither qualified nor experienced for, Barack Obama will instead today hold another publicity stunt. This time the jobless will be the stage props for the Obama publicity stunt. Anyone who doubts this “jobs summit” is anything but a publicity stunt should lose his/her job:

The White House forum comes just one day before the government releases the official unemployment figure for November. Expectations are that the job loss picture will remain grim: Outsourcing firm ADP Employer Services estimated Wednesday that 169,000 jobs were lost last month.

By scheduling its event for Thursday, the White House ensures that headlines about the administration’s unemployment-fighting efforts will dominate the Friday morning newspapers, just as Americans wake up to the bad news.

Publicity stunt Obama should immediately lose his job.

* * * * *

Unqualified and inexperienced Barack Obama is not the only one who should lose his job.

Valerie Jarrett, should lose her job too. For many earlier reasons and now for defending Desiree Rogers (who should lose her job too) and stating there is no need for Rogers to testify before the House Homeland Security Committee investigating the breach of security at the State Dinner for the Prime Minister of India, Valerie Jarrett should lose her job. That is only the latest reason why Jarrett should get the heave-ho. The Secret Service should not take a bullet for the incompetence of Desiree Rogers.

The Chicago Reader reminds us that Alexi Giannoulias (we’ve written about him since 2007) should not be denied the Senate nomination to replace Obama he now wishes to buy. In addition Alexi Giannoulias should lose the job he has now. The Chicago Reader knows, and publishes that Giannoulias is a friend of Obama and a probable crook:

Four years ago Giannoulias was a 29-year-old officer at the bank, and known in political circles—if at all—as the guy who’d helped Barack Obama raise lots of money in the Greek community. Then Obama paid Giannoulias back, endorsing him in TV spots that propelled him to a come-from-behind win in the 2006 Democratic primary for treasurer. Victory transformed him into a promising young progressive with big prospects—until the media began reporting that Broadway Bank had given a series of loans to figures involved in organized crime or political corruption. Even as Giannoulias triumphed in the 2006 general election, critics accused him of being inexperienced, slick, and “ethically challenged.”

Now, after serving as treasurer for less than three years, Giannoulias thinks he’s ready to move up to the Senate…. [snip]

Among the recipients of loans while Alexi worked full-time at the bank were: Michael Giorango, a Florida developer who’s been convicted of running bookmaking and prostitution rings; Boris and Lev Stratievsky, a father-son team later convicted of laundering money for Ukrainian drug dealers; and Tony Rezko, the developer-businessman-political fixer who was eventually convicted of fraud and money laundering for his role in pay-to-play schemes during the administration of Governor Blagojevich. Giannoulias and current bank officials have said all of them were creditworthy when the loans were issued.

Another loan, for $1 million, was issued in 2002 to a woman whose family claims she was suffering from dementia—and that both Alexi, as the loan officer, and his brother Demetris, then the bank’s CFO, knew it but gave her the loan anyway. [snip]

That was true—but Giannoulias himself had overseen a couple of loans to Giorango in 2005, and the Tribune soon dug up records of those. The paper reported that one of those loans had been used to take out a mortgage on a marina in South Carolina that was home to a casino boat. One of the companies with a stake in the boat had been led by a Greek immigrant named Konstantinos Boulis, who’d been murdered in an apparent hit in 2001. The company was then sold to investors that included Jack Abramoff, the Washington lobbyist convicted on federal corruption charges in June 2006, before being sold back to Boulis’s nephew, Spiros Naos—who had donated $5,000 to Giannoulias’s campaign in December 2005.

Alexi Giannoulias should lose his job and lose the senate nomination race in Illinois. The Chicago Reader is to be complimented for the courage to publish this story. The Chicago Reader quotes a banking expert:

“Remember: when you take out a loan for a house or a car, they call your employer. They check your payroll records. When you take out a business loan, you are supposed to verify that this person has the financial wherewithal to pay them back. A good bank will go out and the loan officer will visit the borrower at the site, ask who their top customers are, talk to the top customers, see what the bill cycle is like. That’s what you’re supposed to do when you lend. If you don’t, and you just take someone’s word, that’s poor underwriting.”

Alexi Giannoulias should lose his job and join Antoin “Tony” Rezko in the court system.

Chris Dodd should lose his job and it looks as if 2010 will be pink slip day (we love pink).

No major Democrats back home in Connecticut have publicly come out in favor of easing Dodd out, but a handful of local pols and pundits are raising the possibility — a topic that would have seemed inconceivable a few years back when Dodd’s popularity impelled him to a presidential run. [snip]

He trails Simmons by 49 percent to 38 percent, while clocking an abysmal 54 percent disapproval rating with Connecticut voters, according to a Nov. 12 Quinnipiac poll.

But the really bad news, political professionals say, is that the five-term Democrat is simply too well-known ——and mistrusted — to move his numbers much more than he already has.

Chris Dodd is not the only Dimocrat who will lose his job soon. Other elected officials see the pink slips (we love pink) coming. Gary Ackerman, a Long Island New York Congressman, fears a loss to Republicans too and communicates that fear in an email:

This past Election Day brought a number of troubling omens for 2010 right here in Queens and Nassau:

· Republicans came away with both Queens City Council seats in my District
· Democrats lost control of the Nassau County Legislature
· The seemingly invincible Democratic Nassau County Executive lost what was viewed as unwinnable seat for the Republicans

Outside of New York, Republicans replaced progressive Democrats as Governors in New Jersey and Virginia. They’ve shown they can win in our community.

Gary Ackerman will have lots of Obama enabler company in 2010. Dimocrats finally know that 2010 will be the year of pink slips (we love pink). Now come the early, unexpected, “retirements”:

Tennessee Rep. John Tanner’s decision to step down at the end of his term has Democrats worried that a trickle of retirements will turn into a flood.

Democrats won their majority in 2006 — and built on it in 2008 — in large part by running conservative Democrats in Republican-leaning districts. But with Rep. Dennis Moore (D-Kan.) and Tanner now heading for the exits, there’s growing concern that the party’s strategy may be unraveling just in time for 2010.

“It’s the beginning of an avalanche on our side,” one Democratic strategist said. “Morale is bad, and we’re seeing guys in their 50s and 60s, who have some time left, who can make some money and have a phase two in their careers.”

Dimocrats who enabled Obama, Dimocrats who supported Obama in the primaries should lose their jobs.

In 2008 the New York State Democratic Party raised massive amounts of money from the gay community with the promise that if they finally took control of the New York State Senate they would pass a gay-marriage bill. Yesterday the New York State Senate decisively defeated such a bill. Every Dimocratic New York State Senator as well as every fundraiser of the New York Dimocratic Party who exploited the gay community and failed to deliver should lose their job.

Now that Comcast has purchased the network of General Electric - every host of MSNBC along with the “personalities” of the News Division at NBC should lose their jobs. Chris Matthews should lose his job immediately for his slur against West Point.

Treasury and Federal Reserve officials who enabled, who demanded, bailouts for Citibank should lose their jobs.

That had to be what Citigroup, with its firsthand expertise with bailouts, must have been thinking when it lent $8 billion to Dubai last year. Oh, and here’s an interesting fact: Citigroup made the loan to Dubai on Dec. 14, 2008. Take a look at the calendar — that’s after it received tens of billions in TARP funds. Citigroup’s chairman, Win Bischoff, said at the time, “This is in line with our commitment to the U.A.E. market in general, and reflects our positive outlook on Dubai in particular.” Good call.

Win Bischoff should lose his job too.

Obama Health insurance scam artists should lose their jobs. Obama economic scam enablers should lose their jobs:

“One of the worst consequences would be if the U.S. government promises 300 million people health care reform and health coverage for everyone – and then can’t pay for it,” said Ralph Neas, head of the National Coalition on Health Care, a group of business, labor and other groups. “There is going to be a considerable public backlash.”

Worse would be the economic effects. “It’s not just the health care system at stake,” Neas said. “It’s our economic system writ large. We cannot have a situation where costs continue to grow at this rate.”

Big Media Obama enablers withholding information on Obama should lose their jobs:

Why is the Los Angeles Times sitting on a videotape of the 2003 farewell bash in Chicago at which Barack Obama lavished praise on the guest of honor, Rashid Khalidi — former mouthpiece for master terrorist Yasser Arafat?

Is there just a teeny-weenie chance that this was an evening of Israel-bashing Obama would find very difficult to explain? Could it be that the Times, a pillar of the Obamedia, is covering for its guy?

ACORN leadership should all lose their jobs, if not their liberty.

The Dimocratic Party enablers of Obama should all lose their jobs. It will happen.

Forget about today’s Obama job summit publicity stunt. What we want to see is more pink slips (we love pink), and more job losses – for those that enabled Barack Obama.

But we yet again postponed publication of “Mistake In ‘08″ because of an article posted in the comments by JanH. We also wanted to feature a video posted by “S”. The video, as cartoon dad Homer Simpson says – “it’s funny because it’s true:

* * * * *

ABC News has a story today which echoes our own story from April 5 called World Leaders And North Korea To Barack Obama: “Sucker”.

ABC News notes that Nobel Prize winner Austin Powers Barack Obama truly is an international man of boobery. Reports ABC:

If Mr. Obama hoped that his week-long four-country visit to Asia, his first as president, would yield concrete accomplishments that might silence critics skeptical that he deserves that prize, he might be disappointed.

Though White House aides insist the president’s trip was mainly to reassert a US presence in Asian diplomacy, and that his itinerary set no expectations for major feats, the president has heard disappointing news in the past few days.

On Tuesday, even as one member of the White House National Security Council seemed to signal his belief that President Obama would soon be pushing for economic sanctions against Iran for refusing to cooperate with international diplomatic efforts to end its suspected nuclear weapons program, Chinese President and Paramount Leader Hu Jintao Tuesday signaled he might not be willing to go along if the matter comes up for a vote on the United Nations Security Council. [snip]

Earlier on his trip, in Singapore, the Prime Minister of Denmark, Lars Loekke Rasmussen, the U.N.-sponsored climate conference’s chairman, formally announced that he did not think there would be an agreement coming out of Copenhagen, and more negotiations will be necessary.

Then, after meeting with Russian President Dmitry Medvedev in a side meeting in Singapore, President Obama acknowledged that US-Russian negotiators would almost certainly not make the deadline for a new nuclear disarmament agreement to take the place of the START treaty that expires on December 5.

More frustrations followed.

On Monday, Chinese government officials refused to broadcast live President Obama’s Shanghai town hall meeting on state-run television.

Moreover, Chinese authorities attacked the US economy. China Banking Regulatory Commission chairman Liu Mingkang blamed falsely inflated assets throughout the world on “massive speculation” caused by a weak U.S. dollar and low U.S. interest rates, which he said prompted “unavoidable risks for the recovery of the global economy, especially emerging economies.”

World leaders continue to hold the callow, celebrity craving, clown in contempt. Austin Powers Barack Obama truly is an international man of boobery.

That world leaders continue to hold the callow, celebrity craving, clown in contempt did not surprise us.

What did surprise was an article by Big Time Democratic honcho Robert Shrum. Shrum has spent the entire year lighting incense before the Obama altar and singing a death Mass over the Republican Party and its tactics and prospects. No longer.

Today Shrum, who is a Democratic fixture having run several presidential campaigns and speech writing since the time of the Kennedys, echoes our article Les Jeux Sont Faits: Barack Obama, 10.2 Unemployed, 17.5 Broken. We ended that article with the Latin quote, Alea iacta est – “the die are cast”. Shrumie agrees, although he extends the deadline through December 15, the Ides Of December:

For Barack Obama and the Democrats, three tests in the last month of this year will cast the fate of both president and party. The first — on the economy — is largely decided, although we don’t yet know the outcome. [snip]

To push through major initiatives on climate control and energy, financial regulation, immigration and equal rights, Obama needs a gathering sense of confidence among Americans that the economy is on track. The December unemployment numbers, which will be reported in January, before the State of the Union message, won’t be vigorous enough to achieve that on their own; but they will be a signal of impending job creation or of persistent job losses in the coming months. If the prognosis is bleak, fearful Democrats will desert the Administration next year, and Republicans will dominate the midterm election and go on to block Obama at every turn in the following two years.

Shrumie knows the prognosis on the economy, is bleak already, but he wants to grade Obama on a generous curve. What Shrumie is actually doing is pushing himself away from the albatross called Barack Obama so that he can later on say “I told you so.” Sorry Shrumie, we ain’t buying.

Shrumie admits that Obama will try to waste more money and bigger deficits while at the same time issuing a deceptive call for “deficit reduction”. Shrumie know this will not work:

But it will take time for the effects of more spending to be felt — likely more time than the months remaining before next summer, when voters will settle on the economic verdict they will deliver in November.

Shrumie just threw Obama under the bus.

Next Shrumie shovels dirt on the Obama and Dimocrats’ coffin on the issue of health “care” “reform”:

The final stage of the health reform battle will require an all out effort from Obama himself. At stake is more than a landmark achievement and the president’s subsequent capacity to pursue change across the board. At stake is also his capacity to hold the Democratic Party together. The sights and sounds of liberal dissatisfaction abound — in nightly commentaries on MSNBC, in last month’s 200,000-strong gay rights march in Washington, and across hundreds of different blogs. What modulates the protests, and contains the criticism, is not merely the president’s personal appeal, but a shared commitment to finally realizing health care as a right and not just a costly privilege.

Devotion to that cause has tempered the unease of the Democratic base, giving the White House leeway on decisions ranging from delayed action on global warming to “don’t ask, don’t tell” and the defenestration of White House Counsel Greg Craig, who was smeared for trying to keep the President’s pledge to close Guantanamo. If health reform falls short in December, however, not even White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel will be able to bar the door. Like Congressional Democrats, the President can’t afford to lose this one (which is also another reason the bill is likely to pass).

“Bolt the door, Louise” Shrumie yells, “disaster is a-comin’” for Boob Obama and his enabler Dimocrats. According to Shrumie, Obama won’t even be able to be a “uniter not a divider” for the Dimocrats, let alone the entire country.

On Afghanistan, Shrumie provides more excuses for dithering, inexperienced, unqualified, never held an executive job, Obama.

By the Ides of December, Obama must answer a third critical test — on Afghanistan.

So desperate is Shrumie that he trashes General McChrystal, the man Obama himself appointed with so many blaring trumpets and words, words, words, of promise of CHANGE and HOPE.

If Gen. McChrystal truly believes that fantasy, what can his recommendations be worth?

Trash the military Shrumie, trash the General that dithering, inexperienced, unqualified, never held an executive job, Obama appointed. That’s the way to go to finish off the Obamination called the Obama Dimocratic Organizing for Obama Dimocratic Obamination Party.

Shrumie also advances the notion of Afghanistan as “Obama’s War”.

But if Obama plunges ahead and the conflict still has no end in sight, the Republicans will simply shift their partisan attack to “Obama’s war.”

With all the under-the-bus, “Obama’s War”, Democratic Party falling apart paragraphs, there is only one sentence that contorts Obama’s face and plunges Michelle Obama into a paroxysm of sleeve yanking. There is one sentence which drenches Obama in a Fever Nightmare. The sentence, which when tied to the Hillary Clinton and Sarah Palin someday summit, is this one:

Inconceivable as it now seems, the President could also face a challenge for renomination from within a fractured Democratic Party.

Shrumie ends his job-hunting, Obama distancing article by noting:

By the Ides of December, the die will be cast.

While we don’t think Hillary Clinton will directly challenge Obama for the nomination in 2012, we do think it is the job of sensible Democrats and smart Hillary supporting websites to drive Obama from the 2012 race. It is also the job for American citizens who care about the country.

Did we mention that “two-thirds of the public thinks that Secretary of State HIllary Clinton’s qualified for the Oval Office. That’s more than Vice President Joe Biden, who’s currently next in line for the presidency.”?

The CNN survey indicates that 67 percent of people questioned say that Clinton is qualified to serve in the Oval Office, 17 points higher than the 50 percent of Americans who think that Biden’s qualified to take over as president.

Who else but Hillary?

We’ll echo Shrumie echoing us: Alea iacta est .

In April of 2008, as Dean/Obama/Brazile/Pelousy/Kennedy plotted to gift Obama the nomination and deny the Democratic grassroots the determinative voice in selecting the Democratic Party nominee for President,
we predicted a Democratic Party civil war.

By May 2008, we stated that the Democratic Civil War was on. We wrote then, “It is a war that must be fought.” On Memorial Day 2008 we not only wrote “The Civil War has begun”, we spoke to the sexism that was apparent and pervasive in the Democratic Party. We quoted some good writings which discussed the situation. Kristen Breitweiser

Those who are responsible for putting Democrats in the broken place we are in right now with regard to Barack Obama had better own it to the end. Leave those bumper stickers on and wear those campaign pins until the bitter end folks because YOU OWN IT. And people are going to want to know whose [sic] to blame.

The London Times:

Yet the excoriation of Hillary – under the cover of Clinton-bashing – raises the question of whether America could elect any woman at all. A country self-flagellating about its racial fissure has basked in its own misogyny. Racism is a proper injustice after all, sexism a Vaudevillian amusement. And so the “Bros not Hos” T-shirts depicting Obama (the black brother) and Hillary (the whore) are simply a blast. The Hillary Clinton novelty nutcrackers, on sale in American airports, are just frat-boy joshing, while a crude racial novelty item – perhaps a mammoth Obama pepper grinder to indicate the stereotypical size of the black male organ – is unlikely to have a patent pending.

Those who heckled Hillary with “iron my shirts” would be indicted or lynched if they barracked Obama with “bus my table” or “shine my shoes”. And it may be his slip of the tongue, “a bad habit”, as he says, to call a female reporter “sweetie” – although what might it be if Hillary called a black writer “boy”? – but did the journalist herself deserve to be branded a “bitch” or a “fat slob” merely for taking umbrage?

When the Democratic convention trashed Hillary votes by nominating Obama, Hillary supporters and many, many, Democratic women prepared to vote against Obama. The Democratic Party and Barack Obama, which hitherto paid little to no attention to women then began to wave the red flag of abortion rights and the Supreme Court to get Hillary supporters to debase ourselves and vote for Obama. Here at Big Pink we would not fall for the abortion red flag ploy. We wrote about how women had been ignored but now were being played for fools:

Now, Obama supporters and Democrats appear only to be concerned about Women. Hillary supporters are told: ‘The Supreme Court, Oh, The Supreme Court, Think of the Supreme Court and abortion and blah, blah blah’.

Women are expected to only care about abortion – not their self respect.

The cries for “Unity” are heard in abundance, in full shout, from those that sowed the seeds of division. However, the seeds of division have borne a bumper crop this year.

Democrats like Obama/Dean/Brazille/Pelosi think they can wave the red flag of ‘Supreme Court’ or ‘Abortion’ and women will come running to the aid of the Democratic? Party and forget the misogyny Obama/Dean/Brazille/Pelosi never spoke against while Hillary and her supporters were belittled and denigrated.

We debunked those arguments and demanded respect for women and for equality. We made it clear that we did not trust Obama, nor Dimocrats, on women’s issues nor on abortion rights, nor on Supreme Court appointments. Now the same Democrats/PINOs/Hopium addled boobs that declared abortion rights as the be all and end all, want to convince Democrats and women that abortion rights and equality should be cast aside for the greater good.

In 2008, Dimocrats said “vote because abortion rights are so important”, but in 2009 the argument is “suck it up, abortion rights are not so important”.

This time we Hillary supporters are not alone in noticing the Dimocratic and Big Blog Boys PINO hypocrisies. And open warfare after a preparatory period, with shooting, heralds the Democratic Civil War.

* * * * *

The boy PINOs, and they are boys, at Move-On are running attack ads attacking Democrats who voted “no” on the Obamination health scam. The boys at PINO Move-On do not care about women’s equality rights. No surprise here about those Obama-loving boys.

While the boys of Move-On attack Dimocrats we have congressional Dimocrats who voted FOR the Obamination (now they claim to have 41 votes who this time really mean it, already committed, again) echoing John Kerry. “I voted FOR it, before I voted AGAINST it” say the Dimocrats.

As we wrote in our last article, who is going to believe the useless “pro-choice caucus” or the “progressive bloc” and their latest threats? They voted FOR the Obamination. Now they stomp their feet and say “next, I’ll vote AGAINST”. Imagine the ads “I voted FOR it, before I voted AGAINST it”.

The “progressive bloc” and the “pro-choice caucus” betrayed their own constituencies just like Gay-American “leaders” betrayed their own and just like some Jewish “leaders” betray their own and just like abortion rights groups (think NARAL endorsing do nothing newbie Obama over always there Hillary) betrayed their own. They are all boobs who will defend Obama and throw away all of the few principles they give lip service to.

These useless fools are now making even more not credible threats:

We will not vote for a conference report that contains language that restricts women’s right to choose any further than current law.

As if anyone believes them they say this foolishness.

The remaining Hopium guzzling boobs of the “creative class” will be the only ones who believe these empty threats. Representative Diana DeGette, as we wrote previously, now tells the Washington Post that she will abort the Obamination unless women are only oppressed as they are currently. Possibly DeGette and Slaughter will hold their breaths and turn purple but no thinking person can possibly believe these clowns.

Meanwhile the gay Hillary haters who trashed Hillary and Bill Clinton while they fellated Obama now want to organize a gaycott or boycott or something (these boobs call it a “pause”) which is too little too late. Until and unless these boobs realize that Obama must be removed from office or at the minimum removed as a 2012 candidate the problem will not go away. The problem is Obama and his situation comedy coalition.

Here is a list of boobs who led Democrats astray and continue to shamelessly promote themselves as “leaders”, but are the ones responsible for continued support of Obama:

Joe and I are launching today a donor boycott of the DNC. The boycott is cosponsored by Daily Kos, Jane Hamsher of FireDogLake, Dan Savage, Michelangelo Signorile, David Mixner, Andy Towle and Michael Goff of Towle Road, Paul Sousa (Founder of Equal Rep in Boston), Pam Spaulding, Robin Tyler (ED of the Equality Campaign, Inc.), Bil Browning for the Bilerico Project, and soon others.

It’s really more of a “pause,” than a boycott. Boycotts sounds so final, and angry. Whereas this campaign is temporary, and is only meant to help some friends – President Obama and the Democratic party – who have lost their way. We are hopeful that via this campaign, our friends will keep their promises.

So please sign the Petition and take a Pledge to no longer donate to the DNC, Organizing for America, or the Obama campaign until the President and the Democratic party keep their promises to the gay community, our families, and our friends.

These Hillary haters and Obama enablers need to be removed from the debate. They think they are cute with their simpering “pause”. They are Obama loving boobs who have led the once great Democratic Party astray and plunged the nation into the abyss by supporting Obama. These fake gay “leaders” betrayed their constituency when they supported gay-basher Obama and continue to betray with their fake “pause” and their fake outrage.

At the Hopium drunk booby hatch we call “Nothing Left” the excuse machine is working overtime. But the Hopium boozehounds are not taking the nonsense with their usual glee, if the comments are to be believed. This comment gets to the point:

Don’t people realize that unless the progressive movement decisively breaks with its slavish devotion to Saint Obama and the Democratic Party, we’ll never get our country out of this mess? Now is not the time to congratulate these hacks, now is the time to get angry!

Some are even beginning to question the boys on the blogs:

what is the use of the progressive blogosphere if it merely echoes what the Beltway Democrats say and think?

If those who run those blogs merely mouth the conventional wisdom, what is gained? Only another voice in an already too-crowded echo chamber.

The only way these blogs can be useful is if they are informed and skeptical analysts of the stream of information/disinformation that our politicians shower us with daily. If they become simply another establishment outlet disseminating the same stuff, they become useless.

I appreciate your efforts on this issue, but this diary goes in the wrong direction.

Too late. The Big Blog boys have been an echo-chamber of Big Media Hillary hate since 2007. The source of ire for that comment was a ludicrous article by the ludicrous Mike Lux who persists in the defense of flim-flam Obama. The article was so ludicrous it was roundly mocked and jeered. Even in the Nothing Left dens, the Hopium guzzlers are falling off the tree.

This comment in response to ludicrous Mike Lux gets to the heart of the matter even as it is met with Hopium addled ignorance and misinformation:

Clinton would’ve stood up for us. That’s the difference. She knows how to fight.

We expect Hillary to continue to bide her time and continue to be a “team player” but we cannot wait for the day she breaks out of her gilded cage and tells the truth.

Along with the typical Hillary hate and Obama love at Nothing Left, some are not only questioning their “leaders” but they are ever so slowly beginning to realize the Big Blog Boys have sold them out. Now there is even open mockery of the “progressive bloc” by the creative class minions who are learning they were flim-flammed and taught to tolerate misogyny and the savaging of a true Democrat – Hillary Clinton – in order to oppress the nation with the flim-flam man from Chicago.

Funny, I don’t read much anymore about the Progressive Bloc at OpenLeft. Cat got your tongues?

These Big Blog Boys are the boobs that bark for donations to the “progressive bloc” of do-nothing boob Dimocrats. These Big Blog Boys are the boobs who attacked Blue Dog Democrats and Republican Joe Wilson for calling Obama a liar – then immediately turned their attentions to raising over a million dollars for the Blue Dog that will run against and be beaten by Joe Wilson. These are boobs, plain and simple – boy boobs who call themselves the “creative class”.

In another bullet flying on the Big Boy Blog called Nothing Left one commenter gets it that the Obama health insurance scam is an Obamination that demands defeat. This comment comes from the “creative class” boobs who now realize the Big Blog Boy “leaders” who hated Hillary are boobs or worse:

The bill sucks, okay. The bill sucks. We aren’t talking about demanding perfection. We are talking about a bill that, in many ways, is worse than the current situation. [snip]

Good negotiation requires credibility. The Congressional Progressive Caucus drew a line in the sand, demanding a robust public option. They didn’t get it. Then they voted for the bill anyway. Way to flush your credibility down the toilet. Maybe Lux doesn’t have much experience in negotiation, but I can assure people that empty threats are a big no-no.

How bad is the Obamination? Another (possibly former) Hopium guzzler explains:

My sentiments echo those of Marcia Angell, M.D. Physician, Author, Senior Lecturer, Harvard Medical School, per her article on Huffington Post this morning:

“Well, the House health reform bill — known to Republicans as the Government Takeover — finally passed after one of Congress’s longer, less enlightening debates. Two stalwarts of the single-payer movement split their votes; John Conyers voted for it; Dennis Kucinich against. Kucinich was right.

Conservative rhetoric notwithstanding, the House bill is not a “government takeover.” I wish it were. Instead, it enshrines and subsidizes the “takeover” by the investor-owned insurance industry that occurred after the failure of the Clinton reform effort in 1994. To be sure, the bill has a few good provisions (expansion of Medicaid, for example), but they are marginal. It also provides for some regulation of the industry (no denial of coverage because of pre-existing conditions, for example), but since it doesn’t regulate premiums, the industry can respond to any regulation that threatens its profits by simply raising its rates. The bill also does very little to curb the perverse incentives that lead doctors to over-treat the well-insured. And quite apart from its content, the bill is so complicated and convoluted that it would take a staggering apparatus to administer it and try to enforce its regulations.

What does the insurance industry get out of it? Tens of millions of new customers, courtesy of the mandate and taxpayer subsidies. And not just any kind of customer, but the youngest, healthiest customers – those least likely to use their insurance. The bill permits insurers to charge twice as much for older people as for younger ones. So older under-65’s will be more likely to go without insurance, even if they have to pay fines. That’s OK with the industry, since these would be among their sickest customers. (Shouldn’t age be considered a pre-existing condition?)

Insurers also won’t have to cover those younger people most likely to get sick, because they will tend to use the public option (which is not an “option” at all, but a program projected to cover only 6 million uninsured Americans). So instead of the public option providing competition for the insurance industry, as originally envisioned, it’s been turned into a dumping ground for a small number of people whom private insurers would rather not have to cover anyway.

If a similar bill emerges from the Senate and the reconciliation process, and is ultimately passed, what will happen?

First, health costs will continue to skyrocket, even faster than they are now, as taxpayer dollars are pumped into the private sector. The response of payers — government and employers — will be to shrink benefits and increase deductibles and co-payments. Yes, more people will have insurance, but it will cover less and less, and be more expensive to use.

But, you say, the Congressional Budget Office has said the House bill will be a little better than budget-neutral over ten years. That may be, although the assumptions are arguable. Note, though, that the CBO is not concerned with total health costs, only with costs to the government. And it is particularly concerned with Medicare, the biggest contributor to federal deficits. The House bill would take money out of Medicare, and divert it to the private sector and, to some extent, to Medicaid. The remaining costs of the legislation would be paid for by taxes on the wealthy. But although the bill might pay for itself, it does nothing to solve the problem of runaway inflation in the system as a whole. It’s a shell game in which money is moved from one part of our fragmented system to another.

This comment demonstrates that women are putting down the Obama Hopium teat held by Big Blog Boys:

F*ck You, Mr. Lux

The Stupak Amendment is not symbolic. It’s the worst blow to women’s reproductive freedom in over a generation. So it may be no more than mere collateral damage to you, but it’s my body and the bodies of 51% of the nation that are being played as a political football. So to quote Ving Rhames in Pulp Fiction “I’m pretty f*cking far from okay.”

So really, f*ck you and f*ck the two bit f*cking horse you rode in on. You want eloquence on this subject, my husband jeff is the guy to go to. I don’t have it in me anymore.

(asterisks added by Big Pink).

We have to remove the “u” from those four letter words, but otherwise some of the Hopium guzzlers are sounding increasingly like Big Pink or even Tea Party people in recognizing the Dimocrats and Obama are a flim-flam operation. The Hopium guzzlers at Nothing Left even seem to remember the town hall lies told by Dimocrats:

Just a month ago, my congressperson held a much-belated town hall meeting where she repeatedly assured nearly 1000 people in attendance (most of whom were there testifying, demanding, clapping and hooting on behalf of some sort of single payer/Medicare for all, by the way!) that we could rest assured about the House…the House was our friend. The House would produce a bill with a truly robust public option…the House would counter the disappointment of the Senate and Baucus with a plan that would serve all Americans well. The House would take care of the people–not big insurance, not big pharma–but the people by taking to conference the strongest possible public option.

As I think back to that, I’m nearly shaking with rage at what has just happened–thanks to our “friend, the House.”

And from you, we get the utterly offensive message –really gross as a matter of fact–that we should understand and learn to appreciate the most regressive sell-out of women in my lifetime (a sell-out orchestrated by the goddamn Democratic leadership--headed up by a woman from San Francisco no less–to rack up the last couple of votes for a bill that was called here last night “watered down, watered down, watered down”) because it wasn’t really a sell-out of women after all. No it was just the necessary casting of women–especially poor, desperate women– as political footballs to pass a lame bill that is, lest we forget is “watered down, watered down, watered down.” Hey, just the nature of the beast, you say.

And then, as if all this wasn’t enough the folks you actually manage to condemn the strongest, the ones you are truly “appalled by,” are the two progressive House Democrats who actually, you know, voted as progressive House Democrats. My god…I have no words for this.

At this point, Progressive Caucus is a joke. The Democratic party is a joke. And the Health Insurance industry is having the laugh of its life.

This is the most infuriatingly obsequious post I’ve ever read on Openleft. How utterly disappointed and saddened I am that you thought to post this.

[And remember how the "creative class" attacked war-monger Hillary and praised that peace loving god Barack Obama? Now these "creative class" boobs will swallow as 100,000 troops are in Afghanistan during election year 2012.]

We went into the Hopium drenched cesspools in our Pink waders so our readers did not have to. We found the analysis at Mother Jones of Obama’s health care scam and the abortion rights outrage in The Price of Health Reform: Abortion Rights?

We re-read the moot paragraphs and Obama style flowery words of the Democratic Party plank on abortion. We read at FireDogLake the anger even among Hopium guzzlers there who realize the health care scam is an Obamination:

I don’t understand celebrating this pile of dung. Sure, pre-existing conditions can no longer be denied. Great. Now the fun part. When the insurance companies have to start covering all these things they weren’t covering before, um, well, guess what happens to premiums? And especially guess what happens to them when there is no PO (or one like this one that is pile of shit), well the premiums are going to go up more.

This bill does NOTHING except make the insurance companies cover people and procedures they didn’t before, but makes sure they get paid handsomely for doing so. OK, the subisides for folks to buy that insurance I’ll agree is a plus, but it would’ve been a bigger plus had they been able to use those subsidies on a real, viable, strong PO.

Oh, and then there’s the Stupid amendment. I’ll bet anyone now that if a health insurance bill is signed by Obama, it WILL include the Stupid amendment.

I know it wasn’t Jane’s fault (bless her for all of her hard work), but the fact remains, we had a PLEDGE from progressives to vote NO, and I gave to that pledge as did thousands of others. The next time a fund like that is set up, how likely do you think it’s going to be we give again?? I know the answer for me. In fact, I want my $100 back.

Sorry folks, I’m NOT celebrating. I hope this bill DIES, and they either start over next year with single payer or nationalize the elections on that issue next year.

and

With respect to “compromise” being necessary to address “political realities” in getting any bill passed, I think that, instead of the perfect being the enemy of the good, which proponents of this bill would tell us, we have something neither perfect, nor good, but simply bad. [snip]

The “change” hoax is being exposed. The national political leadership of the Democratic Party is being exposed. The myth of the populism of the “liberal feminist” figures like Pelosi is being exposed. That is the only silver lining in what otherwise looks like the last chance for a very long time to get a good health care system founded being squandered to cater to plutocratic interests and election PR.

In the Democratic Civil War a great many Hopium guzzlers will soon be imitating John Kerry and saying “I voted for Obama, before I voted against Obama.”

There is another horse that was, before yesterday’s Breeder’s Cup results, expected to easily win Horse of the Year – a horse by the name of Rachel Alexandra. This means that two female horses, are now vying for Horse of the Year. It seems that female horses, whatever their travails, get more respect than female humans.

Gay-Americans know they too get less respect than what we call animals. Remember this?:

During the primary Barack Obama organized a gay-bashing tour exploiting African-American homophobia to his benefit. On election day that homophobia continued.

Proposition 2 in California passed on Tuesday. Proposition 2 benefited farm animals. Proposition 2 protects pregnant pigs, calves and hens as well as any animal in an enclosed area. California farm animals have their rights enhanced in Barack World. California Gay-Americans are sent to the Obama slaughter house.

Proposition 8, with big help from Obama supporters passed in California. Many of those Obama supporters that supported Proposition 8 were African-Americans who voted for Proposition 8 by 70%. Obama said nary a word against proposition 8. Obama’s voice was employed by supporters of Proposition 8 in robocalls to win support for Proposition 8. The Obama South Carolina gay-bashing tour echoed in California.

Many African-American Obama supporters who wept and gloried in the end of racism in America turned on Gay-Americans. [Some wonderful African-Americans fought against Proposition 8 with the same strength that some African-Americans supported Hillary.] Obama said nary a word against the bigotry.

Gay-Americans: Welcome to Reality. .

Welcome to Barack’s World.

Women should have learned the lesson, Gay-Americans should have learned the lesson. Others will have to learn the lesson too:

Obama simply cannot be trusted. Obama cannot be trusted on any issue. Obama cannot be trusted by his friends. Obama cannot be trusted by his enemies. Obama cannot be trusted.

But some women are too hardheaded, if not stupid or supine, to learn. Representatives Diana DeGette and Louise Slaughter (Chairwoman of the Rules Committee) are the laughingstocks who co-chair the laughingstock “Congressional Pro-Choice Caucus”. These two clowns wrote last night:

“Placing onerous new restrictions on a woman’s right to choose sets a terrible precedent and marks a significant step backwards. This effort will effectively ban abortion coverage in all plans, both private and public – marking a significant scaling back of the options offered under existing laws. Such a terrible, last minute amendment to a critical, historic piece of legislation is a shame. This kind of outrageous interference in health care by the government marks a sad day in this struggle and will result in women across America losing the right to health care.”

These two clowns issued the statement then voted for the health care scam last night. Louise Slaughter, as the wooden chair who runs the Rules Committee earlier scampered from the Rules Committee when the Stupak Amendment was allowed to proceed to a vote on the House floor.

Early last month, DeGette the clown wrote:

Since the beginning of the health care reform debate, we have committed ourselves to the premise that nothing in the bill should change existing abortion laws in this country. The Congressional Pro-Choice Caucus will not vote in favor of a bill that takes a woman’s access to care back one step.”

The Congressional Pro-Choice Caucus is over 190 members strong.

Shouldn’t that read “190 members weak“?

We certainly do not begrudge “pro-life” representatives the right to fight for their viewpoint. What we mock is the weakness of clowns like Slaughter and DeGette who prove to be useless cowards after making grand declarations about how they will fight and “not vote in favor of a bill that takes a woman’s access to care back one step.” Then these clowns vote for the bill even as they declare and denounce “a terrible precedent and marks a significant step backwards“. They are Clowns who must not be listened to or believed.

Remember when Obama, in a nationally televised speech promised the nation he would not support any bill over $900 trillion? The House bill passed last night is over a trillion dollars.

Remember the outrage when Obama in a nationally televised speech was called a liar when he declared illegal immigrants would not be included in a health care bill?

Joe Wilson was right:

Obama met at the White House with several Hispanic lawmakers who oppose any prohibition on the ability of illegal immigrants to use their own money to purchase health coverage in a new government-run marketplace.

“He listened to us. We listened to him,” said Rep. Nydia Velazquez, D-N.Y., head of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus. “We made it very clear that 20 votes in the Hispanic caucus” depend on the language in the House bill. Currently, there is no prohibition in the House bill against illegal immigrants buying insurance in the exchange, but the White House backs such a ban and one exists in the Senate bill.

Whatever the merits of insuring illegal immigrants (”undocumented workers” in politically correct language), who can believe anything Obama says if he lies in front of a nationally televised audience? Then Obama thugs attack the truth teller in order to defend Obama. Big Media joins in the protection and does not explicitly point to the Obama lies.

Constitutional lawyer and clown Barack Obama must not have heard of Plyler vs. Doe, the 1982 Supreme Court ruling which effectively will assure that illegal/undocumented persons cannot be denied health care benefits.

Who can trust Barack Obama when he lies with such dexterity in a nationally televised forum, whatever the merits of an issue?

Who can trust Dimocrats when Dimocrats betray the deepest core values they publicly profess but then run away when the time to fight arrives? Who can trust the so-called “Congressional Progressive Caucus” who made all sorts of empty threats then voted for the Obamination? Clowns.

Who can trust Hopium den PINOs who now want war declared on those who voted against the toxic health care scam when they exhausted themselves mocking conservatives who removed a Republican who appeared to be more of a Dimocrat than many other Dimocrats. Frank Rich appears to be unaware of the civil war amongst the Dimocrats even today.

In the Hopium dens, PINOs blame pro-life Dimocrats while ignoring the biggest PINO of them all – Barack Obama. It was Obama who vowed to remove abortion funding from any health care scam he would sign. It was also Barack Obama who included the Hyde Amendment in the 2010 budget.

Some girls, women, and gays (and PINOs and Dimocrats, and Democrats and African-Americans and Jews) who don’t want to be considered less than animals better start singing a new song or remain beasts of burden for Obama.

Last night Nancy Pelousy and the Dimocratic “leadership” strutted like George W. Bush on an aircraft carrier. Now the mission many Americans will demand is to get rid of last night’s “accomplishment”. In 2010 that is exactly what will happen.