Hooray! @POTUS @RealDonaldTrump Goes Full #MAGA: Dumps German Trash #ParisAgreement

Update: Today the great American President Donald J. Trump made many of the arguments against the Paris trash we did (below). ‘I was elected to represent the citizens of Pittsburgh, not Paris’

“As of today, the United States will cease all implementation of the nonbinding Paris accord,” Trump said during a White House Rose Garden announcement. Suggesting renegotiating re-entry was not a major priority, he said, “If we can, great. If we can’t, that’s fine.”

America hater Barack Obama weeps as his America hate legacy is sent to the trash bin.


The two best arguments against the Paris Climate “Agreement”: 1) Why would anyone sign on to a treaty with the same creeps who won’t pay their dues to NATO? 2) The Paris Climate “Agreement” is not about climate. The Paris Climate Treaty is a globalist scheme for distribution of wealth.

We’ll add a third argument against the Paris Climate Treaty: 3) The Paris Climate Treaty is an anti-American creation of the German government aided and abetted by China and other “make America weak again” governments.

There are a lot of other arguments against the Paris Climate “Agreement”. But our top three arguments against the Paris Climate “Agreement” and President Donald J. Trump’s world-wide battle to Make America Great Again are the focus today.

Michael Brendan Dougherty at the Trump hating National Review makes the best argument against the Paris Climate Treaty:

If Europe loves NATO so much, why does the U.S. still bear the burden?

Trump hater Dougherty is not writing about the Paris Climate “Agreement”. But he does make the best argument against the Paris Climate “Agreement”. You don’t have to be an expert at much other than common sense and some basic knowledge about arithmetic and human interaction to understand the importance of this argument. Just ask yourself this one question: WHY SHOULD THE UNITED STATES STAY IN A PHONY TREATY/AGREEMENT WITH PHONY FRIENDS WHO WON’T PAY THE DUES THEY VOLUNTARILY PROMISED TO PAY TO ANOTHER ORGANIZATION THEY ALLEGEDLY LOVE?

If nations like Germany, who profess the great relevance and importance of NATO (No Action, Talk Only) won’t pay the required dues they voluntarily imposed on themselves to finance NATO, why does anyone believe they will abide by the Paris “Agreement” which requires the United States to once again bear the bulk of the burden and only makes “suggestions” for most every other party to the flim-flam? Easy answer for anyone with the slightest bit of common sense: If they won’t live up to their obligations to NATO, they won’t live up to their Paris Treaty obligations.

As to argument #2, indeed, The Paris Climate “Agreement” is a globalist scheme for distribution of wealth. Want proof? Take a look at what the “agreement” states:

To reach these ambitious and important goals, appropriate financial flows will be put in place, thus making stronger action by developing countries and the most vulnerable possible, in line with their own national objectives. [snip]

The Paris Agreement underwrites adequate support to developing nations and establishes a global goal to significantly strengthen adaptation to climate change through support and international cooperation.

The already broad and ambitious efforts of developing countries to build their own clean, climate-resilient futures will be supported by scaled-up finance from developed countries and voluntary contributions from other countries.

Governments decided that they will work to define a clear roadmap on ratcheting up climate finance to USD 100 billion by 2020 while also before 2025 setting a new goal on the provision of finance from the USD 100 billion floor.

Ms. Figueres said. “We have seen unparalleled announcements of financial support for both mitigation and adaptation from a multitude of sources both before and during the COP. Under the Paris Agreement, the provision of finance from multiple sources will clearly be taken to a new level, which is of critical importance to the most vulnerable.”

Yeah, right. A 100 billion dollar “floor” of payments to “underdeveloped” dictatorships and corrupt regimes. Then the 100 billion dollar “floor” of flowing “finance” will increase. Who will pay the hundreds of billions of dollars? It won’t be those “developed” countries that won’t pay their dues to NATO. It will be the United States that will be expected to pay most of the hundreds of billions of dollars.

What will be “gained” in temperature reductions from the Paris Agreement after corrupt regimes in “underdeveloped” countries get billions of American dollars? Other than the destruction of America, nothing on lowered climate:

In a new peer-reviewed paper, I measured the impact of all of the biggest carbon-cutting commitments being made before the summit. It shows that the current EU climate policy – the so-called 20/20 policy, which promised to cut emissions to 20 per cent below 1990-levels – will achieve very little. Even if the EU maintains its cuts all the way through the century and even if none of its cuts are exported (which for now seems wildly unrealistic), the reduction in temperature rise by the end of the century is a miniscule 0.026°C.

With the EU’s new promise to cut by 40 per cent by 2030, you might imagine that it would do a lot more to tackle global warming. But the effect – even if fully adhered throughout the century and with no CO₂ exporting – will be to reduce temperature rises by the end of the century by another 0.027°C.

And if we measure the impact of every nation fulfilling every promise by 2030, the total temperature reduction will be just 0.048°C by 2100. Even if we are overly optimistic and assume that every one of these promises would be not only fulfilled but extended for another 70 entire years, and there is no “CO₂ leakage” to non-committed nations, all the Paris promises will achieve is to reduce temperature rises by just 0.17°C by 2100.

The Paris Agreement is a globalist wealth transfer scheme. The globalists know they can’t openly declare “let’s give small corrupt countries we control hundreds/thousands of billions of dollars”. So the globalists slyly squeal “let’s save the environment by giving hundreds of billions of dollars” to corrupt regimes. The Paris “Agreement” is a tool to fool the gullible.

In this scam to “make America weak again” Angela Merkel of Germany is deeply involved.

So is the European Union. Today the European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker mocked American President Donald J. Trump:

The globalists are in a rage that America has an American President who wants to Make America Great Again to deal with.

We have a suggestion for American President Donald J. Trump on how to deal with Germany: threaten to move or actually move American military bases from Germany to Poland and Hungary. With this threat, Angela Merkel who is up for reelection this year will stop her “make America weak again” attacks against President Donald J. Trump.

The Paris “Agreement” has many flaws. Or rather, in light of President Donald J. Trump’s grand action today, “had” many flaws.

There was no enforcement mechanism. The Paris “Agreement” embraced the notion that signatories to the “Agreement” could write their own rules and regulations and well as reports. This meant that the propaganda ministries of the signatory countries could write rubbish reports of their great actions while doing nothing even as the United States of America was looted.

China, under the Paris “Agreement” could pollute to it’s delight even as American industry was strangled. The United States under the Paris “Agreement” would once again find the court system used to attack its own citizens. Under the Paris “Agreement” lawsuits would be unleashed. The Paris “Agreement” would be used by America haters disguised as climate activists to attack American industry and workers.

The Paris “Agreement” would also exempt nations like China and India from punishments for violations of the non-existent requirements. The United States would bear all the burdens, to achieve nothing on lowered global temperatures, but would destroy the American economy.

The Paris “Agreement” was also a massive transfer of power and American sovereignty to unelected globalist bureaucrats. Too many Americans have died to preserve our freedoms to let this soft coup occur. American President Donald J. Trump will not let that happen.

Barack Obama knew this America hate trash could never pass the U.S. Senate as required by the Treaty Clause of the U.S. Constitution. That’s why Barack Obama declared this trash an “agreement”. Now the great President Donald J. Trump has trashed the trash excreted by Barack Obama.

Today great American President Donald J. Trump kept to his promise to Make America Great Again.


131 thoughts on “Hooray! @POTUS @RealDonaldTrump Goes Full #MAGA: Dumps German Trash #ParisAgreement

  1. …the days of the USA being played for suckers and American taxpayers being used as a “global cash register” are over…and if Europe and Asia doesn’t like it…too bad…

    so grateful we have a strong PDT who has got the guts of the gods from above…

  2. Philippine President Duterte had better hitch his wagon back to the Trump train if he wants ISIS destroyed instead of flirting with Russia and China.

  3. I love this move. The new jobs numbers were already strong. This will only focus on more and better jobs numbers. He’s going to schlong the globalists…lol


    Hillary’s interview at the Code Conference was quite a show. The Dems need to kick her to the curb now or she runs in 2020 again.

  4. After today, it’s higher than 55%:


    Bloomberg: ’55 percent chance’ Trump will win reelection

    Former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg thinks there’s a “55 percent chance” President Trump will be reelected in 2020.

    Bloomberg, who politically identifies as independent, told New York Times columnist Frank Bruni that he thought Democrats didn’t have an effective message to win the 2016 election and could repeat that mistake in 2020.

    “Hillary said, ‘Vote for me because I’m a woman and the other guy’s bad,’ ” Bloomberg said about 2016.
    He said Democrats are still looking for issues and messages. And he worries that too many Democrats are eager to jump into the 2020 race.

    “They’ll step on each other and re-elect Donald Trump,” Bloomberg said.

    Bloomberg endorsed Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton in 2016 and spoke at the Democratic National Convention, calling Trump a “dangerous demagogue.”

  5. What a stump speech that turned out to be !
    At times, whoever was in attendance today had to listen to what Candidate Donald Trump told us repeatedly on the campaign trail. 🙂 &:I was surprised to hear so much applause.

    Silly Josh Earnest. [Didn’t you wonder if his name is a joke?)

    Trump mentioned several times that the Accord was “voluntary” , but Earnest Josh had to paint Donald’s understanding of it as “shrouded.”.

    Thanks for new post.

  6. Update: Today the great American President Donald J. Trump made many of the arguments against the Paris trash we did (below). ‘I was elected to represent the citizens of Pittsburgh, not Paris’

    “As of today, the United States will cease all implementation of the nonbinding Paris accord,” Trump said during a White House Rose Garden announcement. Suggesting renegotiating re-entry was not a major priority, he said, “If we can, great. If we can’t, that’s fine.”

    America hater Barack Obama weeps as his America hate legacy is sent to the trash bin.


  7. YEAH…first time I have been able to leave a comment from my phone
    Saw the funniest comment today…everyone commenting about Hillary and all her excuses & Doug Shoen saying that in her own head…Hillary is running in 2020…and her new slogan will be

    “I’m with me”

  8. S
    June 1, 2017 at 5:15 pm
    YEAH…first time I have been able to leave a comment from my phone
    Saw the funniest comment today…everyone commenting about Hillary and all her excuses & Doug Shoen saying that in her own head…Hillary is running in 2020…and her new slogan will be

    “I’m with me”


    “I’m with Stupid”

  9. Leftist misogyny:


    ACLU Fights Against Law Criminalizing Female Genital Mutilation
    Even though Maine is at high risk for the Islamic ritual.

    Maine GOP Rep. Heather Sirocki is sponsoring bill LD745 which would make the Islamic ritual of female genital mutilation (FGM) a crime. However, the American Civil Liberties Union is very much opposed to the legislation.

    Sirocki says Maine is a high-risk area in America for FGM and happens so often that the federal government sends special funds to help the state. The bill would make FGM a Class B crime which carries a $20,000 fine and up to 10 years in prison. In addition, the bill punishes parents and/or guardians of the victim and criminalizes “vacation cutting” — where the victim is flown overseas to have the “procedure.”

    According to The Daily Caller, the ACLU “staunchly opposes the protection.”

    “ACLU spokesman Oamshri Amarasingham said that the risk of mutilation isn’t worth expanding Maine’s criminal code,” the report states. “The Maine Coalition Against Sexual Assault also supported the ACLU, arguing that FGM is not happening in Maine.”

    But Sirocki said, “Federal prosecutors take a very small amount of cases. The state of Maine deals with thousands of cases. If a situation would occur and this is the issue, if the federal government doesn’t have enough prosecutors, it doesn’t get prosecuted.”

    The bill will be reviewed by the state house of representatives before heading for final approval in the state senate. If it passes, the DC notes, Maine becomes the 25th state to criminalized FGM.

    According to a 2012 Center for Disease Control report, there were 500,000 FGM victims in the United States. Since 2003, almost 800 have violated FGM laws nationwide and been deported. There have been at least 400 additional arrests.

    But the ACLU doesn’t think it’s that big a deal.

  10. Hey Bernie, I hate to break it to you but man can’t fucking stop climate change. As George Carlin once so eloquently stated:

    “The planet is fine. Compared to the people, the planet is doing great. Been here four and a half billion years. Did you ever think about that? We’ve been here, what, a hundred thousand? Maybe two hundred thousand? Two hundred thousand years versus four and a half billion. Do the math. And we have the conceit to think that somehow we’re gonna put in jeopardy this beautiful little blue-green ball that’s just a-floatin’ around the sun?
    The planet has been through a lot worse than us. Been through all kinds of things worse than us. Been through earthquakes, volcanoes, plate tectonics, continental drift, solar flares, sun spots, magnetic storms, the magnetic reversal of the poles…hundreds of thousands of years of bombardment by comets and asteroids and meteors, worldwide floods, tidal waves, worldwide fires, erosion, cosmic rays, recurring ice ages…The planet isn’t going anywhere.
    We are!”

  11. Here’s the more complete George Carlin diatribe

    Funny shit.
    “We’re so self-important. Everybody’s going to save something now. “Save the trees, save the bees, save the whales, save those snails.” And the greatest arrogance of all: save the planet. Save the planet, we don’t even know how to take care of ourselves yet. I’m tired of this shit. I’m tired of f-ing Earth Day. I’m tired of these self-righteous environmentalists, these white, bourgeois liberals who think the only thing wrong with this country is that there aren’t enough bicycle paths. People trying to make the world safe for Volvos. Besides, environmentalists don’t give a shit about the planet. Not in the abstract they don’t. You know what they’re interested in? A clean place to live. Their own habitat. They’re worried that some day in the future they might be personally inconvenienced. Narrow, unenlightened self-interest doesn’t impress me.

    The planet has been through a lot worse than us. Been through earthquakes, volcanoes, plate tectonics, continental drift, solar flares, sun spots, magnetic storms, the magnetic reversal of the poles … hundreds of thousands of years of bombardment by comets and asteroids and meteors, worldwide floods, tidal waves, worldwide fires, erosion, cosmic rays, recurring ice ages … And we think some plastic bags and some aluminum cans are going to make a difference? The planet isn’t going anywhere. WE are!

    We’re going away. Pack your shit, folks. We’re going away. And we won’t leave much of a trace, either. Maybe a little Styrofoam … The planet’ll be here and we’ll be long gone. Just another failed mutation. Just another closed-end biological mistake. An evolutionary cul-de-sac. The planet’ll shake us off like a bad case of fleas.

    The planet will be here for a long, long, LONG time after we’re gone, and it will heal itself, it will cleanse itself, ’cause that’s what it does. It’s a self-correcting system. The air and the water will recover, the earth will be renewed. And if it’s true that plastic is not degradable, well, the planet will simply incorporate plastic into a new paradigm: the earth plus plastic. The earth doesn’t share our prejudice toward plastic. Plastic came out of the earth. The earth probably sees plastic as just another one of its children. Could be the only reason the earth allowed us to be spawned from it in the first place. It wanted plastic for itself. Didn’t know how to make it. Needed us. Could be the answer to our age-old egocentric philosophical question, “Why are we here?”

    Plastic… asshole.”

  12. What the Dims don’t understand:

  13. Outris, George Carlin understood the arrogance of the left. That’s what a lot of this climate change crap is all about: arrogance. The left is arrogant and believes their words can change the world. Carlin knew better. In the grand scheme, humankind is a tiny little close to nothing. But we are arrogant and think we rule the planet. Then comes a tornado and we know better.

  14. The arrogance is the magical thinking that the planet will “heal itself” at no cost to human life. The climate change crap is political crap. But the environmental issues are real. Those who are sick of “environmentalists” just do not want to face reality.

    It is so insane to have economies that depend on “growth”, most of which comes from population growth, to sustain them on a planet of limited resources. Yet, all these central planners have been big fails.

    Who should run the world?

  15. I love a Trump, absolutely love him!

    Great posts Admin, been reading, just couldn’t post. Still a little difficult, but better, much better.

    Have to say, I was a little worried Trump would pull a Judge Roberts, just for a fraction of a minute, but hey, wouldn’t be me if I didn’t worry.

  16. As with any globalist scheme you cut off the money. All of the schemes involve large sums of money which enables large amounts of skimming. The sums are so large that they require “public” financing ie taxes. Cut off the money and they are f’ed. France’s Macron kept calling and begging and Merkel tried threats. They and their countries are free to continue with the scheme but they are stuck with migrants costing too much and thus are a little short of cash besides they are supposed to be getting not giving. As President Trump mentioned they can’t tell him exactly where the money will go or for what. It is just “we need some big money and now for everybody’s cut”. Being very familiar with the Mafia and the NY state government Trump knows it is just a big pot of money to pass out to cronies and lackies and themselves. The Paris Accord schemers even gave up on climate change and admitted it was wealth transfer just because. It is another Ponzi to finance bureaucrats, flunkies, and globalists. Without the big money it will fall apart and quickly.

  17. I still have to go thru several steps to log in. More important, this site will NOT load on my IPad.
    Admin- I do hope the problems will be fixed soon….such a shame to lose this great source of information.

  18. This year, in Paris, has to be the year that the world finally reaches an agreement to protect the one planet that we’ve got while we still can,” said President Obama on his recent trip to Alaska. Miguel Cañete, the EU’s chief negotiator, has warned there is “no Plan B – nothing to follow. This is not just ongoing UN discussions. Paris is final.”

    But the more seriously you take the need to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions, the angrier you should be about the plan for Paris. With so much political capital and so many legacies staked to achieving an “agreement”—any agreement—negotiators have opted to pursue one worth less than…well, certainly less than the cost of a two-week summit in a glamorous European


  19. how ironic…
    Europe…the EU…and BM in USA going crazy over the determination of PDT to pull out of their farce of an agreement that linked the USA to their ‘Paris Climate Accord’ by O’s executive order…not going to happen

    no teeth from an ex Prez for another poorly negotiated “agreement” that our own Congress would never support…if that isn’t globalism gone amuck I don’t know what is…

    Paris and their Accord better get used to the idea that the USA is no longer their fool and open cash register…while they attempt to drive the USA further into debt…

    (NOTE…to all you “big shots” start flying coach instead of increasing your carbon print with expensive private planes…put you money and energy where your big mouths are)

    BUT…the irony is that supposedly there are 30 states and governors and mayors that will continue on with the good work they have been accomplishing with the continued clean climate change work occurring within our country (without the Paris Accord)…the USA is already doing its part…why must we suffer and PAY for the ruins of others…

    so that is PDT’s point…and he wins again…bottom line, the USA and our progress and economy doesn’t need to be held hostage by the globalists to continue to do our part…

    the government doesn’t need to be enforcing more restrictions and regulations if the private sector wants and chooses to do so on their own…

    so let the private sector monitor itself and continue on with their climate change improvements…

    our govt will continue to work for clean air and water, etc..

    PDT has just signed over 30 executive orders to release American business from O’s strangling regulations…

    Why in the world would PDT now kneel to the Paris Accord and allow them to dicatate and re-impose regulations and penalties that PDT is liberating and freeing American businesses and American taxpayers from…

    and to add insult to injury…the Climate Accord doesn’t even want to be held accountable with all the money they want to drain from the USA…yeah, that will work…NOT!

    Note to BM…get a clue…your free ride, ponzi scheme gravy train is over…get used to it…if you do not like us…tough…

  20. They think this hurts PDT? This just makes President Trump look better:


    Local newspaper Berliner Kurier use the powerful, if not vulgar, headline: “Earth to Trump: F*** you!” on its front page, in response to the US president backing out of the climate change deal.

    The front page was published on Thursday ahead of the official announcement, but was widely circulated online after Donald Trump’s speech yesterday.

    One Twitter user, who was apparently from the US, wrote: “We completely agree with you Germany. Our deepest, deepest apologies.”

    Another tweeted: “Bravo. I couldn’t have said it any better.”

    The Berlin tabloid is notorious for targeting politicians and doesn’t hold back in its attacks.

    In March, the paper published an article about Israeli President Benjamin Netanyahu, labelling him as one of the world’s most insane leaders, using the word “Führer” — a term typically reserved for Adolf Hitler — to describe him.

    The headline “The seven looniest leaders of the world” drew immediate and strong criticism from the Israeli Embassy, who blasted the report as antisemitic.

    German chancellor Angela Merkel was joined by French President Emmanuel Macron and Italian Prime Minister Paolo Gentiloni in condemning President Trump’s decision to back out of the climate agreement, which is made up of nearly 200 countries.

    The trio issued a statement shortly after Mr Trump’s announcement saying: “We deem the momentum generated in Paris in December 2015 irreversible and we firmly believe that the Paris Agreement cannot be renegotiated, since it is a vital instrument for our planet, societies and economies.”

    German Foreign Minister Sigmar Gabriel also blasted the president’s announcement on Thursday, saying the move threatened economic growth and technical progress.

    Several members of Merkel’s Cabinet took aim at Mr Trump, and issued a seething joint statement saying: “The United States is harming itself, us Europeans and all other people in the world.”

    Mr Trump’s decision to abandon the agreement for environmental action signed by 195 nations is a remarkable rebuke to heads of state, climate activists, corporate executives and members of the president’s own staff, who all failed to change his mind with an intense, last-minute lobbying blitz.

    The Paris agreement was intended to bind the world community into battling rising temperatures in concert, and the departure of the Earth’s second-largest polluter is a major blow.

    The decision was, however, a victory for Stephen Bannon, President Trump’s chief strategist, and Scott Pruitt, the Environmental Protection Agency administrator, who both spent months quietly making their case to the president about the dangers of the agreement.

  21. Kathy Griffin. Does she think this hurts PDT? This just makes President Trump look better:


    ‘There’s a bunch of old white guys trying to silence me!’ Kathy Griffin breaks down in tears claiming Trump family ruined her life – as her lawyer scoffs at report Barron was upset over severed head video

    Kathy Griffin broke down in tears speaking about the constant attacks from the public and members of the Trump family over the past few days

    She said that she has been receiving constant death threats, which she described as detailed and specific

    Griffin also said that President Trump ‘broke’ her and that she does not expect her career to recover from his family’s attacks

    She added that she will not back down from this fight, saying: ‘I am not afraid of Donald Trump. He is a bully’

    Griffin declared at one point: ‘There’s a bunch of old white guys trying to silence me!’

    It was also confirmed at the press conference that the Secret Service is investigating Griffin over the image [snip]

    Griffin at another point in the press conference declared that this would not be happening to her if she was a ‘white man.’

    Her lawyer Lisa Bloom also suggested at one point during the press conference that despite reports, Barron was likely not that upset after seeing the image of Griffin with the decapitated head by stating the child was ‘allegedly’ traumatized. [snip]

    ‘I am really nervous, I have never done a press conference,’ said Griffin after she was introduced by her lawyer.

    After making a few jokes and stating that she stands by the apology she released earlier this week, Griffin said: ‘The president and his grown children and the first lady are personally trying to ruin my life forever.’

    She then went back to that notion a few moments later, speaking in disbelief as she reiterated her claim that ‘this president of all people is going to come after’ an ‘obnoxious comedian.’

    Griffin also tried to explain the reason behind the photo and video shoot by saying: ‘I am not good at being appropriate.’
    That became clear soon after when she announced that she would not stop attacking President Trump just because he had targeted her.
    ‘I am going to make fun of him more now,‘ said Griffin.

    She then made a point of adding: ‘I am not going to threaten him, I have no desire to harm him.’

    Griffin was also ready with some thoughts on why President Trump had elected to attack her while his son Don Jr. called for her to be fired from her jobs.

    ‘They are using me as the shining object so no one talks about his FBI investigation,’ said Griffin.

    She then revealed that all she wanted to do was get back to work, something that is becoming difficult with five venues cancelling her show in the wake of the incident.

    ‘I’m not for everybody,. I am barely an acquired taste frankly,’ admitted Griffin.

    ‘I’ve had everybody turn on me. And I just want to make people laugh.’

    That being said, Griffin declared: ‘I am not laying down for this guy.’

    She later added towards the end of the press conference: ‘It’s a good time to be a comedian but a scary time to be a citizen.’

    Griffin also said that it was Megyn Kelly who inspired her to take the image, explaining: ‘I started thinking of that Megyn Kelly thing. By the way, I’m sure Megyn Kelly can’t stand me. I thought of that blood coming out of her eyes blood or coming out of her wherever.’

    She later stated that she regretted not using a blow-up doll and more ketchup for her prop.

    Griffin also found some time for humor, joking about President Trump at one point by saying: ‘If you meet him he wants to call you The Donald. I said I am The Kathy, and that went over his nest.’

    She also poked fun at her conservative mother Maggie, quipping: ‘My mother is not speaking to me because she is in love with Tucker Carlson.’ [snip]

    In footage of the shoot, Griffin is seen joking that she and Shields will have to flee the country once it gets out.

    ‘We have to move to Mexico today,’ she said, ‘because we’re gonna go to prison. Federal prison.

    ‘Call your dad, apologize, then let’s you [and me] go to Mexico because we’re not surviving this.

    She’s seen in the footage lifting the grisly ‘head’ out of a metal bowl, then rotating it towards the camera until it hits a spot that Shields likes.

    Finally, at Shields’ demand, she drops it to the ground.

    In the video, Griffin also joked: ‘Tyler and I are not afraid to do images that make noise.

  22. Anyone tired of winning? The continuing fight:


    The Justice Department petitioned the Supreme Court late Thursday to immediately reinstate President Trump’s extreme vetting policy, asking the justices to erase injunctions issued by several lower courts.

    Mr. Trump’s lawyers said the president was acting within his national security powers when he issued his executive order in March halting admissions of most visitors from six majority-Muslim countries with ties to terrorism, and pausing admissions of refugees.

    “We have asked the Supreme Court to hear this important case and are confident that President Trump’s executive order is well within his lawful authority to keep the Nation safe and protect our communities from terrorism,” Justice Department spokeswoman Sarah Isgur Flores said in a statement announcing the filing.

    Federal courts in Hawaii and Maryland have blocked various parts of the executive orders. The Maryland judge’s decision has since been upheld by the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, while the 9th Circuit is considering an appeal of the Hawaii judge’s ruling.

    The Trump administration has asked the justices to take the case and swiftly erase both injunctions, allowing the policy to take effect.

    Justice Department lawyers said Congress has granted the president wide latitude to decide who is allowed to be admitted to the U.S.

    But judges — primarily those appointed by Democratic presidents — have faulted Mr. Trump for his campaign rhetoric promising a ban on Muslims, saying that even though the current order is not such a ban, the “animus” then-candidate Trump showed toward a religion still taints his actions today.

    Mr. Trump’s lawyers said the court made a mistake by “attempting to delve into the president’s supposed true motives and pointed to the president’s speech last week in Saudi Arabia where “decried ‘the murder of innocent Muslims.’”

    Trump backers point to myriad majority-Muslim countries that aren’t singled out in the executive order as evidence it’s not animated by antipathy toward a religion, and Justice Department lawyers say many immigration decisions involve dividing persons based on their country of origin.

    The court erred in invalidating a religion-neutral order of the President not because of what it says or does, but because of what supposedly motivated the President (and his advisors) in issuing it,” the lawyers said.

    In petitioning the high court, Mr. Trump sets up the first major test for newly installed Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch.

    The case is also likely to be a challenge for Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., who famously upheld Obamacare by refusing to look at President Obama’s rhetoric insisting the law wasn’t a tax. Instead, the Chief Justice, joined by four Democratic-appointed justices, said the law on its face was a tax no matter what Mr. Obama had said, so it was constitutional under the federal government’s taxing power.

    In the case of the vetting order, Mr. Trump argues that regardless of campaign rhetoric, his latest version was carefully drawn to meet courts’ demands, and is on its face legal.

    The revised order would put a 90-day halt to most admissions of visitors from Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen — each country that was initially identified by Mr. Obama and the previous Congress as needing special scrutiny.

    The revised order also imposes a 120-day pause on refugee admissions.

    Civil liberties groups urged the high court to leave the lower court injunctions in place, saying those judges are serving as a check against a president trying to target a religion.

    “Again and again, our nation’s courts have found that President Trump’s Muslim ban is unconstitutional,” said Karen Tumlin, legal director of the National Immigration Law Center.

    Kudos to the writer, Steve Dinan, for pointing out something we noticed and no one until now has remarked upon. That is the Roberts’ ObamaCare decision which ignored Obama’s many statements saying ObamaCare was not a tax. Roberts then declared ObamaCare constitutional because indeed, it was a tax.

  23. Kathy should call Hillary and the two of them can comiserate and blame everyone else for their own actions…while taking no responsibility for themselves…and Kathy G wants to talk about “shiny objects”…girl, you are radioactive…

    as Kurtz said ” Kathy Griffin beheaded her career”
    you are expendable…there are many more comedians lining up to take up your space…just go away…


  24. have to say one last thing about Kathy Griffin…her whole career is based in making fun of other people…all her “jokes” are at the expense of someone else…she has been ruthless in her insults and attacks on others…

    If anyone embodies the concept of being a ‘bully’ it is her…and now she wants to hide behind being a “comedian” and cry she is being “bullied” what a joke she is…

    just like a bully…they can dish it out, but once their own actions slap them back in their face…they fold like a cheap suit…can’t take it…metaphorically, live by the sword (or beheading) die by it…

    now who cares what she has to say…she is just digging her hole deeper…and showing no grace, remorse or empathy at all…all about Kathy and her narcissitic self…boo hoo…

  25. USE the Control Shift and R key AT THE SAME time after you LOG IN at the bottom

    Kathy Griffin trying to say that MELANIA TRUMP is trying to ruin her carrer? WTF

    Barron Trump saw this GRUESOME head of his dad covered in blood held up by a strange woman and WE ARE SUPPOSED TO FEEL SORRY FOR KATHY GRIFFIN


  26. JB….is Trump leaving office tomorrow? Last time I checked, he’s been kinda busy, kinda on a roll, and…uh..still has some time. Sheesh.

  27. Washington Post gets hit in the face with reality from its own poll (which is a trashy YouGov poll which underestimates Trump’s level of support):


    New poll: only 3% of Trump voters regret their vote

    Within weeks of the November 2016 U.S. presidential election, social media posts expressing voters’ second thoughts began trending. While some Donald Trump voters felt he was backtracking on initial hard-line positions, the Huffington Post and other websites reported on hashtags such as #Trumpgrets — used by voters irked that his campaign persona was not simply an act to win votes. A subsequent wave of regretful Trump voters tweeted about executive orders they perceived as misguided and dangerous.

    Even more nuanced mainstream news stories included such headlines as “These Iowans voted for Trump. Many of them are already disappointed” or comments that “a significant segment of Trump’s coalition is not entirely enchanted with his actions or public persona.”

    In contrast, polls seem to suggest that the 45th president enjoys historically high approval ratings among members of his party. Other journalists report continuing enthusiasm from the small towns that delivered his strongest electoral support.

    Which story is closer to the truth? How many Trump supporters continue to support him enthusiastically? How many continue to support him but are disturbed by many of his actions? How many genuinely regret their vote?

    Here’s how we did our research

    Our Mood of the Nation Poll from Penn State’s McCourtney Institute of Democracy provides answers. Conducted by YouGov, the poll tracks the mood of the public through traditional survey questions and numerous open-ended questions that allow citizens to express themselves in their own words. The poll’s methodology is described here.

    Our Feb. 23-27 poll asked a nationally representative sample of 1,000 Americans to report on how they cast their vote in November. The results of these reports closely align with other national polls, with Hillary Clinton voters comprising 49 percent of the sample, Trump voters 46 percent, with 3 percent and 2 percent for minor-party candidates Gary Johnson and Jill Stein, respectively.

    Who would vote differently?

    On the next screen, we asked everyone, “Suppose you could go back in time and vote again in the November election. What would you do?”

    Respondents were presented with the same choices — Trump, Clinton, Stein, Johnson, someone else, or not vote at all. Of the 339 poll participants who originally voted for Trump, only 12 (3½ percent) said they would do something different.

    Only three individuals (fewer than 1 percent of Trump voters) said that, could they go back in time, they would cast their vote for Clinton. Seven said they would vote for one of the minor-party candidates.

    When we asked why, most regretful Trump voters pointed specifically to his performance as president. (Misspellings are original.)

    “He has moved kinda fast with the immagration ban, and abortion law.”

    “I don’t like his decisions so far.”

    “Trump’s actions since the inaugeration.”

    “… Trump cannot get out of his own way. He won’t stop running his mouth and has no humility.”

    These sentiments echo regrets highlighted in social media. But they are too few to conclude that Trump’s electoral coalition has somehow eroded. Moreover, of the already small number of Trump voters expressing regret, only one in four would have shifted their support to the Democratic nominee.

    In short, the 45th president’s electoral coalition remains intact.

    What would Trump voters tell him now, if they could?

    But maybe the coalition has weakened. After all, even if they would not now switch their vote to Clinton, many Trump voters may harbor serious reservations..

    To find out, we asked all those sticking with Trump, “If you could send a message to President Trump, what would it be?”

    We did this to give Trump voters the opportunity to ask the president to tone things down, act more presidential, identify issues of importance to them or express support.

    Of the 327 Trump voters who would vote for him again, only 42 (or 13 percent) asked him to start behaving more presidential. Typical was a 51-year-old woman from Virginia who said she would tell the president, “Continue with your agenda but stop tweeting.”

    Similarly, an 81-year-old man from Florida offered this advice, “Maybe cut down on the Twitter’s and keep your head up you are doing fine.”

    Other supporters offered advice like:

    “don’t talk too much”

    “think before you speak!”

    “Please drop the war on the fake news media, and concentrate more on the real issues.”

    We could identify only seven Trump voters who would send a really strong message. One 47-year-old man from Alabama wrote,

    I would ask him to get off his high NY horse and get down to basics and stop lying, cheating, stealing, blowing his horn and get with the proper Cabinet and get this country back on its feet. We don’t need a wall, but we do need to stop immigration…

    Yet these messages were dwarfed by the enormous show of support for the president among those who voted for him. Many, like this 61-year-old independent from Wisconsin, expressed gratitude, saying, “Thank you for what you are doing for our country. Keep up the good work. Don’t cave under pressure.”

    The largest number of Trump voters sampled — representing millions of voters — asked the president to “stay strong,” “keep it up,”“hang in there” or “stay the course.” Many simply expressed their feelings as fans, as with the respondent who wrote, “Go Donald Go!” Others expressed excitement and pleasure over his performance, as with the voters who wrote:

    “Keep up the good work…continue draining the swamp to bring America back to her greatness.”

    “You are doing a wonderful job. Keep on doing what you are doing. The American people are behind you. Only those who do not respect what you are dissenting.”

    No regrets

    The Mood of the Nation Poll shows clearly that media attention to the #trumpregrets phenomenon is very misleading. For Trump’s supporters, any news reports that his first weeks as president have been rocky, unpresidential or worse have hardly mattered. There is virtually no regret.

    While his governance has galvanized opposition groups and his overall approval level remains low by historical standards, his electoral base is not only intact but enthusiastic and energized, providing Trump with a significant base of power. Those who fail to recognize this may find themselves underestimating his capabilities in governance in the same way that many underestimated his candidacy.

    As we repeatedly write, the continued support of President Trump electoral base is the only thing that matters. All the beatings by Big Media are ignored or mocked by Trump supporters. Trump supporters who get nervous thinking that other Trump supporters might be fooled by Big Media are misguided.

    Notice also that this poll is a YouGov poll which is heavily biased against Trump. Also note that this poll was taken before the astounding speech in which President Trump promised to care about Pittsburgh, not what Paris wants.

    That even the Washington Post recognizes that Trump supporters continue to strongly support Trump is astonishing. It is astonishing because the Washington Post finally realizes reality cannot be denied and that all their attacks against Trump only solidify Trump’s support among his base voters.

  28. More astonishing news, this time from the ObamaCare repeal and replace front:

    The entire Twitter time line on this Tweet should be read.

    This is excellent news which means the crap nonsense about an ObamaCare repeal and replace in “three buckets” can and will be done mostly in the first bucket. The second bucket which is Executive Orders issued by Trump are the easiest to achieve.

    This is the plan we and many others, particularly Senator Ted Cruz have espoused.

  29. I believe in global warming but it has become an issue which has made certain people very wealthy, caused thousands to lose their jobs, and put the burden of paying mostly on the USA. I don’t think our leaving the Paris Agreement will have much effect . The amount that man has contributed to global warming is still uncertain and we will are be long gone when and if the seas rise high enough to cause any type of extinction like event.

  30. The usual suspects are furious that the old shakedown model is breaking down. The US was supposed to fund the “Accord”. Billion dollar ticked out ugly building, lots of travel expenses, fake science and studies, cocktail parties, politically correct artwork gracing the offices and halls (made by wives, friends, nephews, girlfriends) of a new set of connected bureaucrats. Illuminati such as Obama, Clinton, Kerry, Tony Blair, and various billionaire shitheads would be paid to “speak” great truths to gatherings (plus travel, canapes with truffles, top notch booze and some babes) with lots of networking and brown nosing. Lots of fun. UNTIL…as Neil Cavuto said “the guy who was supposed to pick up the check left the restaurant early”. Of course Hillary was good with the US taxpayer paying the tab. But she lost and the Euro-weenies tried to talk Trump into it. Trump himself said they couldn’t explain what the “Accord” was even supposed to accomplish. Other than wealth redistribution from the US taxpayer to Euro-weenies who need a new do-nothing virtue signalling gig.

    The new religion of climate change reminds me more and more of the Druids (from what little I know of them). They would sacrifice their most valued items, horses, slaves, gold, etc (never themselves of course) to get, stop, or make something happen. The Druids were trying to influence the climate (which is the sun) and economics. Of course it didn’t work. And the climate change priests are still trying to do this even though we know much more than these ancients. The oceans are not rising but rather ground is sinking like it has done for billions of years. It is called plate subduction. The tectonic plates sink or subduct into another plate. It is most noticeable near the coast (water!) and cities disappear as they turn into bogs or swamps and have for thousands of years. It isn’t “magic” or pollution it is geology and fluid mechanics or hydrology. It has happened throughout the life cycle of planet Earth. The earth has cooling and warming. It is based upon sunspots or lack of them. The last major one was the Maunder minimum . It was from 1645 and continuing to about 1715 and played hell with weather, agriculture, human settlement, health and plagues with famines, etc. We are probably entering another cycle and we have a huge lack of knowledge about sunspots. Then there are volcanoes which affect weather cycles and we are seeing increased activity.

    So Obama’s model for “challenges”, accords, commissions, bullshit councils, etc is breaking down. He brought it from Chicago where he had made a small living off of it for a long while before nationalizing it. The Europeans had monetized the basic scam after WWII. Now he nor Kerry nor billionaire global climate change proselytizers are going to get their cut. Of course they are furious. Aren’t you when you don’t get paid?

  31. Mormaer, if you care to respond.
    I’ve used gut instinct to dismiss global warming.
    But I cannot use the same to dismiss grave concern for all the holes being drilled into Earth.

    From the last half of 20th century I would think geothermal means of controlling interior building temps, along with the towering power lines that require deep cement-filled holes for stability, along with lateral drilling plus injecting chemicals of varying toxicity for extraction of gas as well as disposal of really nasty stuff, is going to kill us all. Already there is some association of these practices with earthquakes.

    Because my gut is the best brain I have, I cannot take this concern further. Can you, or anyone comment, or point me in a direction to learn more?

  32. Lindsay Loafers June 1
    I support President Trump’s desire to re-enter the Paris Accord after the agreement becomes a better deal for America and business.
    11,198 replies 6,025 retweets 28,698 likes
    and real Donald retweeted.

  33. It dawned on me a decade ago that the vaunted elites are not that good.

    Slowly, but surely, the illusion of competence masquerading under the phrase HARVARD TRAINED has given way way to reality, revealing a class of snake oil salesmen who have no commitment to public service beyond feathering their own nest.

    Just look at the treaties Obama signed. There is no question whatsoever that he and his camp followers were determined to sell out the middle class for the rosier lights of membership in the global elites.

    Seeing what is occurring, how can it be otherwise?

    Richard’s comments below are directly on point/

    The energy expended on reviling Trump, however satisfying, does little to address voter disgust with the political class as a whole.

    They sense a helplessness in the face of a growing entropy, both over the world and their lives, that was happening even before the election.

    They saw the Obama administration come to office on the proposition the Bush policy of intervention failed and elected him to try something else.

    They also saw his attempts to “lead from behind” and bomb from on high fail too.

    The Eiffel Tower was dimmed for a third time in a week to commiserate with yet another bombing, underscoring the fact no one knows the solution. But they do know where wreaths, candles, and blinker bulbs can be had and supply them instead.

    Maybe Trump doesn’t have a clue about how to fix things. But the more serious problem is not many people are convinced Hillary knows, either.

    Just as the lack of a cure reduces the worth of doctors, elites are on the defensive because their stock of knowledge, so useful in the past, is now ineffectual against the present chaos.

    This helplessness has the effect of lowering their status, as with a priesthood faced with the manifest futility of their rites.

    Legitimacy is based on working magic and the wizardry is faltering.

    It partly explains the resentfulness at being demoted to the level of Donald. The mojo left Hillary when people realized she was just a befuddled old lady. While there is nothing wrong with that, there is nothing special either. Without the magic the contest between them was suddenly no longer between a mere mortal and the “smartest woman in the world” but between a reality TV host and a granny, a much closer fight. On that leveled field, even Trump’s randomness actually seemed an advantage: a willingness to punch buttons that Hillary would never dare attempt. While that could make things worse, voters in 2016 were desperate enough to try something new.

  34. If history teaches us anything it teaches us that revolution always eat their children. These social justice warriors will be among the first casualties of the revolution if their movement succeeds, as it did in 1789.

  35. I see where the Scarlett Pimpernel, Harvard trained Judge Orrick (vaccum boy) has struck again. And the little Hawaiian Judge, Harvard trained as well is likewise involved in the vital task of violating his oath of office. Like the character in Alice in Wonderland, I can use words to mean anything, and like the Moby Dick they see land where there is no land. What better testament could there be to the merits of a Harvard degree? As long as we have such bitter partisans on the bench and outfits such as the ACLU forum shop, the government should file affidavits of prejudice against such judges, who reject the judicial role and behave like a politician in black robes. They do more to undermine the rule of law than a platoon of social justice warriors/baboons.

  36. The nickname of the little Hawaiian Judge is Mai Tai (without the paper mache umbrella), shaken not stirred.

  37. The name of the Seattle Judge is Fred Flintstone.

    The name of the Fourth Circuit judge is Bait and Switch.

    Get the point? A rogues gallery, who sail under the Jolly Roger.

  38. Using the Comey files they can be fairly certain they are not getting another Comey as an “interim,” and they do not have to wait for the circus of appointing a new permanent “director” through congressional approval. Most of the heavy lifting on rooting out FBI corruption and starting investigations into the swamp will be done by the “interim” before a new director is appointed. I suspect the Trump administration hopes the approval FBI Director process will be slow and tedious, so there is no political interference with the housecleaning that is starting.

    In one masterstroke, Trump has eliminated a truly toxic and dangerous enemy to his administration and our country, dealt a horrendous blow to the Clinton/Obama and deep state machines, begun the restoration of the integrity of the FBI and the DOJ, and gained incredible ammunition to begin hunting the foul creatures in the swamp.

    Happy Hunting President Trump… and God Bless!


  39. Wbboei, check this out via LegalInsurrection:


    How can Ginsburg participate in Travel Order case after her *campaign* statements about Trump?

    Donald Trump’s second Executive Order on visa entry from six majority Muslim countries is now before the Supreme Court. [snip]

    The 4th Circuit’s decision found that the Executive Order, though facially neutral, “in context drips with religious intolerance, animus, and discrimination” and that context was “a backdrop of public statements by the President and his advisors and representatives at different points in time, both before and after the election and President Trump’s assumption of office.” [snip]

    The 4th Circuit decision has been widely criticized for its reliance on campaign statements, as well as for substituting judicial security evaluations for those of the executive branch.

    This case, unlike other more mundane cases involving Trump policies that may come before the court, clearly places Donald Trump’s words, personality and credibility in issue.

    One of the Justices already has expressed a view on Trump’s credibility. In July 2016, Justice Ruth Bader Ginbsburg was quoted in a CNN interview deriding Trump as “a faker”:

    Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s well-known candor was on display in her chambers late Monday, when she declined to retreat from her earlier criticism of Donald Trump and even elaborated on it.

    “He is a faker,” she said of the presumptive Republican presidential nominee, going point by point, as if presenting a legal brief. “He has no consistency about him. He says whatever comes into his head at the moment. He really has an ego. … How has he gotten away with not turning over his tax returns? The press seems to be very gentle with him on that.” ….

    “At first I thought it was funny,” she said of Trump’s early candidacy. “To think that there’s a possibility that he could be president … ” Her voice trailed off gloomily.

    “I think he has gotten so much free publicity,” she added, drawing a contrast between what she believes is tougher media treatment of Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton and returning to an overriding complaint: “Every other presidential candidate has turned over tax returns.”

    That July 2016 CNN lashing of Trump was not a one-off. Justice Ginsburg made two other negative public statements about Trump during the campaign (via Politifact):

    Interview July 7, 2016 with Associated Press

    Asked what if Trump won the presidency, Ginsburg said: “I don’t want to think about that possibility, but if it should be, then everything is up for grabs.”

    Interview July 8, 2016 with New York Times

    I can’t imagine what this place would be — I can’t imagine what the country would be — with Donald Trump as our president. For the country, it could be four years. For the court, it could be — I don’t even want to contemplate that.

    Referring to something she thought her late husband, tax lawyer Martin Ginsburg, would have said, she said: “Now it’s time for us to move to New Zealand.”

    Justice Ginsburg came under heavy criticism from a wide spectrum of commentators, since it is unusual for a Supreme Court Justice to express views on a political candidate and campaign. Even the Editorial Board of the NY Times agreed that Justice Ginsburg’s comments were inappropriate, Donald Trump Is Right About Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg:

    Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg needs to drop the political punditry and the name-calling.

    Three times in the past week, Justice Ginsburg has publicly discussed her view of the presidential race, in the sharpest terms….

    There is no legal requirement that Supreme Court justices refrain from commenting on a presidential campaign. But Justice Ginsburg’s comments show why their tradition has been to keep silent.

    In this election cycle in particular, the potential of a new president to affect the balance of the court has taken on great importance, with the vacancy left by the death of Justice Antonin Scalia. As Justice Ginsburg pointed out, other justices are nearing an age when retirement would not be surprising. That makes it vital that the court remain outside the presidential process. And just imagine if this were 2000 and the resolution of the election depended on a Supreme Court decision. Could anyone now argue with a straight face that Justice Ginsburg’s only guide would be the law?

    The Washington Post editorial board also was critical of Justice Ginsburg’s comments, Justice Ginsburg’s inappropriate comments on Donald Trump:

    However valid her comments may have been, though, and however in keeping with her known political bent, they were still much, much better left unsaid by a member of the Supreme Court. There’s a good reason the Code of Conduct for United States Judges flatly states that a “judge should not . . . publicly endorse or oppose a candidate for public office.” Politicization, real or perceived, undermines public faith in the impartiality of the courts. No doubt this restriction requires judges, and justices, to muzzle themselves and, to a certain extent, to pretend they either do or do not think various things that they obviously do or do not believe. As the saying goes, however, “hypocrisy is the compliment vice pays to virtue.”

    As journalists, we generally favor more openness and disclosure from public figures rather than less. Yet Justice Ginsburg’s off-the-cuff remarks about the campaign fall into that limited category of candor that we can’t admire, because it’s inconsistent with her function in our democratic system….

    Justice Ginsburg didn’t quite apologize, but did say she regretted the comments: [snip]

    Justice Ginsburg’s negative comments about Trump, though less direct, continued after inauguration. On February 24, 2017, the Washington Post reported:

    Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, a noted critic of President Trump, suggested that she doesn’t believe the country is in good hands but said she is hopeful about the future.

    “We’re not experiencing the best of times,” Ginsburg said Thursday on BBC’s “Newsnight,” though she did not comment directly about the president.

    In a case in which Trump’s campaign comments are front and center, how can Ginsburg hear a case in which she has complained publicly about Trump and Trump’s campaign?

    This is not a situation where a Justice merely is presumed to have political leanings (don’t they all?), or is affiliated with one political party more than another. Justice Ginsburg has publicly questioned Trump’s credibility, and that credibility is an issue in the case as it presents itself in the 4th Circuit decision from which review is sought.

    Justice Ginsburg cannot be removed from the case. The judicial code cited by the Washington Post editorial doesn’t apply to Supreme Court Justices. She would have to recuse herself voluntarily.

    I don’t expect Justice Ginsburg to recuse herself. But her *campaign* comments about Trump’s campaign look even worse in hindsight.

    On every Trump related case demands should be made for Ginsburg recusal.

    Dear President Trump, how about a Tweetstorm on this issue?

  40. wbboei
    June 3, 2017 at 12:13 pm


    It partly explains the resentfulness at being demoted to the level of Donald. The mojo left Hillary when people realized she was just a befuddled old lady. While there is nothing wrong with that, there is nothing special either. Without the magic the contest between them was suddenly no longer between a mere mortal and the “smartest woman in the world” but between a reality TV host and a granny, a much closer fight. On that leveled field, even Trump’s randomness actually seemed an advantage: a willingness to punch buttons that Hillary would never dare attempt. While that could make things worse, voters in 2016 were desperate enough to try something new.



    witness the past few weeks as Hillary drones on with her growing list of excuses for why she lost to ‘the reality show guy’ and the respect for her deflates by the day…even by once admirers…ironic how much Hillary and Kathy Griffin’s actions and responses are so similiar (their birthdays are 9 days apart…revenge, attack and the bite of the Scorpios)

    Hillary, far from being an independent feminist, is now an example to young women on how to harp and complain and blame everyone else for their actions and to run from accepting the responsibility of their own actions…

    In the last couple of weeks, even Hillary supporters are now opening their eyes to what a delusional and small person she really is…she is stuck in her own time warp…and won’t get out…now it becomes even more clear as to why people did not and do not trust her…

    She is very bitter and now she wants to lead “the resistence” for revenge…nothing more useful or positive than that…she wants revenge…what a waste of everyone’s time and devotion to her…no longer any shining example of anything constructive except to put herself in front of only safe audiences to bolster her own defeat…

  41. If after watching what is currently going on in London…

    If our Supreme Court cannot grant our President the powers he is empowered with by our Constitution to vet and protect American citizens then there is something very wrong with our country, the SC and adherence to our Constitution

    the “evil doers” are vying to win…they want to kill us and will use any method they can…including deceiving us…we have got to be pro-active and smart…and stop the ‘liberal’ mumbo jumbo nonsense

  42. holdthemaccountable
    June 3, 2017 at 9:26 am
    I have to disagree with your gut. The issue has been politicized and misused, but very basic science supports the issue as real. Very simply, as hydrocarbons are consumed, the CO2 (Carbon Dioxide) level of the atmosphere increases. There are histories on the increase. As the atmospheric composition changes, so do it’s average thermodynamic properties. That is basic science. The issue is one of the heat capacity. The same amount of heat added (mostly from the sun), will result in higher temperatures as the concentration of CO2 increases. Of course, as the atmosphere gets hotter, losses to space will increase so the heat balance and details of how much the atmosphere will increase gets complicated. Then, of course, there are other variations (volcanoes and the like) that obscure trends due to CO2 changes. It is a science problem and there are science solutions. The jerks in charge are not looking for them.

    As far as fracking is concerned, the danger is to our water aquifers. There is virtually no monitoring for contamination, thanks to the Bush and Obama destruction of the EPA as an organization that protects the environment (safe air and water). Big Business is doing what it wants to. They have no protections to establish baselines on contaminants and monitor aquifers for increases when there is fracking in the area. If they contaminate the drinking water it may be a long time before you know it and you will never prove it was them.

    And, yes, fracking can destabilize geology.

  43. S, what could it possibly be? We are stumped. We heard there are “incidents” in London a day before the Ariana Grande concert and a few days before the national elections. But we can’t possibly figure out what is happening.

    We heard the various “clues”. A car/truck mowed down a bunch of people. People stabbed in the throat. What could the motive possibly be? Who would do this? The police must be stumped! Who can figure this out? Can anyone figure this out? It is an impenetrable mystery.

  44. Yes Admin…I agree…and the dupes in the ‘progressive community’ in the USA want to invite those ‘mysteries’ here…

    as if, only the most purest of heart wants to come here…

  45. What could it possibly be? Is it climate change activists angry at Trump? Who could possibly have done this? What could the motive be?

  46. our bleeding hearts want to invite these killers here to slaughter us…in our own streets, our own cafes, on and on…

    the first person i thought of when this story broke was Kathy Kay…that idiot from Great Britain, a main stay pundit on MSNBC, of course…that says “we all have to get used to this”

    too bad, she wasn’t in one of those pubs or peacefully walking around or on London Bridge to actually “feel” the TERROR of these savages…wonder how “used to it she would feel then”

  47. I will be curious to hear how the mayor of London responds to this…if it is his usual pablum and platitudes or some sense of reality manages to enter his brain

  48. I am watching the BBC…reporters stating that people that have witnessed some of the attacks are so traumatized they cannot even describe what they have seen, women with their throats that have been cut…they are in tears and in shock
    from the sounds of it i will not be surprised if there have even been beheadings, at least attempted…

    also people saying men yelling “this is for allah’


    PDT seems always to be ahead of the rest of everyone else…and is usually correct …time for the haters to start listening to him


  49. Is this a clue?


    A van plowed into pedestrians on London Bridge and two people were stabbed at a nearby cafe.

    A witness on the bridge told CNN the van mowed down pedestrians as it sped south across the bridge, leaving bodies lying in the roadway.

    Another witness, who was in the cafe, said a man with a “massive knife” entered the restaurant at Borough Market, just south of the bridge, and stabbed two people inside. The patrons sheltered in the basement and police then arrived at the scene, the witness said. The condition of the stabbed people was not known.

    The BBC reports more than one person died on London Bridge. Nick Brandon of British Transport Police told The Associated Press that they received reports of “multiple” casualties in an incident possibly involving a knife and a vehicle.

    A witness of the London Bridge incident said the attackers were yelling, “This is for Allah.”

    Police remain baffled.

  50. so much for gun control in Great Britain…their crazy terrorists prefer knives and slitting people’s throats….

  51. As we repeatedly write, the continued support of President Trump electoral base is the only thing that matters. All the beatings by Big Media are ignored or mocked by Trump supporters.
    Yep. Trump’s reelection in 2020 is already assured, for precisely this reason.

  52. Showtime for Judge Gorsuch. Maybe Judge Roberts too will find his balls again after losing them over Obamacare.
    Trump will win this one. The law is crystal-clear. Slam dunk.

  53. We’re are the scum bag BDS’ers who are quick to condemn artists who dare play the democratic state of Israel but say nothing when they beloved Muslims are killing their fellow British citizens..

  54. America is the only country in the world, With a president, That has Balls enough to call this stuff, Exactly what it is.
    Radical Islamic Terrorism!!!

  55. OMG! I do not know how I was able to leave this comment after not being able to access the comment area after so many times. I doubt that I will keep trying to make comments in the future because it is so frustrating to attempt to do so anymore.

    Anyway, You all must read this well-written article. President #MAGA Trump is on the ball. Thank God for President Trump and Attorney General Sessions.


  56. admin

    June 3, 2017 at 7:09 pm

    We can’t figure any of this out.

    Who would do this?

    What could the motive possibly be?

    More important, Judge Oreck of the most overturned circuit in the country, agrees.

    And far be it from me to argue with a Harvard trained Obama donor who bought his seat on the court.

    In arbiter dictum, the Scarlett Pipernel casts this pearl to the swine:

    If it looks like a duck
    If it walks like a duck
    If it quacks like a duck

    Then per force, it is an elephant pretending to be a duck.

    Consistency, you see, it the hobgoblin of small minds.

    And to state what is implicit whenever someone drops the term Harvard trained. There are no small minds at Harvard.

    Just dysfunctional ones.

  57. Reza Aslan’s misguided hate projected onto Trump…

    he calls PDT “a piece of—“…not the savages and killers in London…

    what will CNN do with this one…their “religious guru and scholar”

  58. Admin: Am I the only one who can’t open this site on an IPad?

    It’s a shame the site has become so inaccessible as it has been my favorite and best source of news.

  59. Nice to see Me-again flopped last night. If anyone came away looking great it is Putin.

  60. Kerry has turned into a total cartoonish idiot. Not that he was ever that bright but at this point one does wonder if the botox has totally pickled what brains he had to start with.

  61. WOOT WOOT Winning!!!
    within his constitutional rights to impose and because of that, America will be a much safer place. Not only did the court overturn the lower court’s decision on the ban, it also restored the order to its original glory, banning terrorists from 7 countries and allowing President Trump “all of the authority granted a President in matters of immigration.”

    The ruling makes significant changes to the way things are going to be done at airports. No longer will you have to be inconveniently pulled out of line at random because we have to search the same number of regular people as we do Muslims. Agents at the airport will be able to profile how they see fit. Without the influx of refugees applying for asylum at the airport, since they simply won’t be coming here. the TSA can work on rooting out the people who want to do us harm who already live here.


  62. It’s a Trumpquake

    It’s A “Geopolitical Earthquake”: A Stunned World Responds After Saudi Alliance Cuts All Ties With Qatar

    Jun 5, 2017 2:30 PM

    Virtually nobody saw it coming.

    Late on Sunday night, the Saudi-led alliance of Gulf Arab states, Saudi Arabia, the UAE and Bahrain including Egypt, shocked the world when they announced they had severed ties and closed borders with one of the Gulf’s wealthiest, if smallest, neighbors Qatar, a (now former) member of the Gulf Cooperation Council in what we called a “geopolitical earthquake” and what Bloomberg dubbed “an unprecedented move designed to punish one of the region’s financial superpowers for its ties with Iran and Islamist groups in the region.”

Comments are closed.