@SpeakerRyan Is A Dope; Big Media Is The Enemy

How big a malicious dope is Paul Ryan? How corrupt and destructive to America is Big Media? Let’s look at the dope first then the corrosive effect of Big Media corruption in our elections.

Before last Friday Paul Ryan was in a win/win position. Paul Ryan was forced by the GOP grass roots to issue a limp endorsement of Donald J. Trump and that phony endorsement freed Paul Ryan to constantly attack Donald J. Trump and never say a word in any way critical about Hillary2016. Paul Ryan was in a sweet spot.

Paul Ryan was in a win/win position no matter what happened in November. If Hillary2016 won Paul Ryan saw himself as the premier Republican leader, as he would have been. More importantly, Paul Ryan wants to pass TPP and illegal immigration amnesty and a Trump loss in November would allow Speaker Ryan to do just that. Quisling Paul Ryan would pass the Chamber of Commerce agenda in the House. If Donald J. Trump won, Speaker Paul Ryan would be the leader of the Republican House of Representatives and Speaker Ryan would lead the Dims and a rump group of Republicans in opposition to Trump. Whatever happened in November, Paul Ryan had it gamed out as a win.

But then Paul Ryan overreached and now Paul Ryan is in a lose/lose position. If Hillary2016 wins, Paul Ryan will be booted as Speaker. If Donald J. Trump wins, Paul Ryan will be booted as Speaker. What a dope. He had it all but wanted to dump Trump to be the candidate after he knocked off Mike Pence. What a dope.

Sleazy Politico reports that in the swing states the GOP leaders are standing with Trump. This is an attack against Paul Ryan. Rasmussen polls showed Donald J. Trump on Monday behind by seven. By the end of the week Rasmussen has Trump up by two. As M. Joseph Sheppard documents, the tracking polls after some ups and downs during the week, nothing much changed on the poll front despite all the pearl clutching and hair pulling. Trump is also rebounding in the state polls.

Even Gallup with it’s strong tilt against Trump shows that only 28% of the American public is “satisfied” with the direction of the country. Gallup warns:

When citizens are frustrated with the way things are going in the nation, they may be motivated to vote for change.

As we have repeatedly noted every time Chicken Little squawks “It’s over for Trump”, this is a change election. In a change election the candidate for change wins.

So what happened this past week? This past week Big Media decided to pummel Donald J. Trump with everything available because nothing thus far has made “It’s over for Trump” true. Big Media tries and tries to destroy Donald J. Trump and all that is accomplished is the American public watches the coup against the people.

Big Media is using polls to legitimize the Big Media attacks against Trump. Many of the polls are entirely cooked. Big Media attacks Trump then highlights even the least movement in the polls against Trump to demonstrate it is the people that are against Trump. But then Trump fights back. The people see Trump fight back. The people decide to stand with Trump. It’s a movement for change. Big change, not chump change.

Why do the people stand by Trump? The usually clueless home of Big Media collaborator with Hillary2016, CNBC makes a good guess:

Get ready for more Trump the pit bull that we saw on Sunday night. For some reason, when voters see Trump angrily fighting for himself, many of them take it be an example of how he’ll fight for them.

It’s what we wrote about to explain Donald J. Trump’s rise back in July of 2015:

Despite all these ideological attacks and corporate desponsorship attacks, and Big Media attacks, Donald Trump is growing in popularity with the voters. Why? We explain in simple English the Donald Trump mystique:


We’ve been warning about this for the longest time. In recent elections in so-called “democratic” countries – the voters are being ignored. In election after election, voters vote for an establishment political party – then once in power the political party they voted for stabs them in the back. Witness the 2014 elections in the United States in which the Republican Party won elections based on opposition to Barack Obama then once in cozy offices they pull out all the stops to assist Barack Obama to pass ObamaTrade. This happens over and over and over.

Eventually voters catch on and they decide to vote for the biggest motherf*cker around who will do what they want. The voters find themselves in a snake pit, surrounded by vipers, and they reach up to grab whatever stick is handed to them.

Big Media and the entire political ruling class are terrified of Donald J. Trump. Want to know why Big Media and the entire political ruling class is terrified of Donald J. Trump? Big Media believes they are the power which ensures the supremacy of the political ruling class. Here is how Big Media dictators think of themselves:

Those of us in the media are not mere stenographers. We decide whose voices to elevate. We amplify information. We generate the narratives that define public discourse. This isn’t an opinion about how journalists should do their jobs; it’s a statement of fact about the power of information and those who wield it.

The main difference among journalists is that some are agnostic about what happens on the other side of the editorial wall. The rest of us are not.

As we wrote years ago, Big Media has turned into a political party determined to protect it’s power. It’s why Big Media opposes the Citizens United decision. Before Citizens United, corporate power by companies such as the Washington Post Company and the New York Times Company could be wielded as a monopoly exerting political power with editorial page endorsements valued in the millions to political campaigns. Now the companies which publish and control these newspapers and broadcast outlets no longer have monopoly power. Combine the Citizens United Supreme Court decision with the rise of the internet and the ruling class finds itself in danger.

The Citizens United decision and the rise of the internet threaten the ruling class. Then to the horror of the ruling political class, Donald J. Trump stood up to challenge their corruption as well. Now with Donald J. Trump, the power of the internet, the diminished power of Big Media, the ruling class sees the glint of the guillotine.

The rise of the internet and citizen journalists is much like the invention of the printing press. Before the printing press, kings and courtiers did not care much about “public opinion”. There was no such thing as public opinion. The people did not count. Then with the printing press and the rise of the written word, public opinion became a force to contend with. Over the years the owners of the printing presses began to think themselves as lords and masters. Now they have become Big Media in control of the printing presses, the pixel presses, the broadcast news and the cable outlets. It’s time to lop off the heads of Big Media in the same way the heads of dictators and kings rolled through the streets.

Years after we coined the phrase “Big Media” a Big Media outlet use the very term:

It’s an idea that was born when Time Inc. merged with Warner Communications Corp. in 1989, to form Time Warner. It endured as the industry’s prevailing business model for nearly a generation, spawning such clones and mongrel breeds as Viacom, News Corp and GE’s NBC Universal. The vertically integrated media conglomerate was—or was supposed to be—many amazing things, giving a handful of companies unprecedented power over the media—and the chance to earn outsized profits in the process. But its defining characteristic was its sheer size, earning it a fitting nickname: Big Media.

But the theory behind the strategy relied on more than size. Housed under one roof, a single Big Media entity would control the means of producing and distributing media content, from magazine and books to television shows and movies, from cartoons and theme parks to sports franchises and the cable networks that carry the games to recorded music labels and music publishers. In Time Warner’s prototype of the model, it would control everything from the first letter of a Time magazine story or Warner Books novel to the last alphabet of the credits at the end of a Warner Brothers flick or HBO series based on the magazine story or the book division’s fiction.

Power corrupts. Absolute power corrupts absolutely. Big Media is absolutely corrupt. Big Media is the enemy.

Hillary Clinton supporters from 2008 recall that election well and we remember the absolute corruption of Big Media. That was a primary election drenched in sexism and misogyny. Big Media flexed its muscles in favor of Barack Obama. Nothing Barack Obama did was focused on. Everything Hillary Clinton said or did was attacked or ignored if it was favorable. Big Media was all in for Barack Obama and all in against Hillary Clinton.

In the New York Times, Judith Warner masturbated herself in the editorial pages as she and her friends dreamed of, literally dreamed of sex with Barack Obama:

The other night I dreamt of Barack Obama. [snip]

Were other people, I wondered, being possessed by our new first family?

I launched an e-mail inquiry. And learned that they were. Often, in strikingly similar ways.

Many women — not too surprisingly — were dreaming about sex with the president.

That cheap Big Media whore, Judith Warner masturbated herself on the editorial pages of the New York Times. Back in 2008 whores like Judith Warner engorged themselves watching Barack Obama’s penis while pretending to be all for woman power.

These woman power advocates of 2016 have forgotten what happened in 2008. In 2008 Big Media did everything to protect and fellate Barack Obama. That’s a fancy way of saying “blow job”. Any Hillary2016 advocate who associates themselves with Big Media only because this time Big Media is “on our side” is a whore. We have warned these whores that “what goes around comes around“. Big Media is not supporting Hillary Clinton nor did Big Media support Barack Obama. It’s the contrary. Barack Obama supported and enabled Big Media in 2008 and 2012. Now in 2016 Hillary Clinton is a whore to Big Media.

In 2008, Harry Reid claimed Barack Obama was a light skinned negro who talked OK. Biden liked Obama because Obama was clean. Big Media could find no fault with Barack Obama.

In 2008 CNN however possessed a videotape which could have destroyed Barack Obama and brought forth all the allegations of sexism and misogyny which were so evident in that campaign. Did CNN let American voters see the videotape? No. The videotape would have hurt Obama so the videotape was suppressed:

Obama’s Own Lewd Tape Emerges: Flaunts His Erection to Female Reporters [snip]

The video was captured by CNN back in 2008 while then-Senator Obama was first running for the highest office in the land. The 1:38 clip (below) features Obama seeming to proudly show off his erection to giggling female reporters, even giving them a full 360-degree display of his manhood while they cheer him on.

Big Media is the enemy. Whores like Judith Warner have been replaced in 2016 by Hillary Clinton 2008 supporters who now sing the praises of Barack and Michelle Obama and/or Hillary2016.

Big Media is the enemy. It’s not just “liberal” Big Media that is the enemy:

Wikileaks: ‘Anti-SJW’ Heat Street Founder Louise Mensch Pitched Ad Script to Hillary Clinton Campaign

Former British Conservative Party Member of Parliament and “right wing” blogger Louise Mensch privately tried to assist the Hillary Clinton campaign, emails published by Wikileaks reveal.

Mrs. Mensch runs the Rupert Murdoch-backed blog Heat Street, which claims to stand against identity politics and what it labels “social justice warriors” under the slogan “no safe spaces.”

However, its editor in chief, Mrs. Mensch, was caught writing a campaign advertisement script for the Democratic candidate – a woman who has traded off identity politics and social justice warrior politics. The ad appears to be based on the idea that Mrs. Clinton should be in office simply because she is female and is supported by “multiracial” women.

“… much rather have your girl Hillary,” Mrs. Mensch wrote in an email to Michael Kives of Creative Arts Agency (CAA), a former Clinton campaign advocate.

She said Hillary’s “intelligence [is] beyond doubt” but argued she “is not capitalizing on the yearning that we have to see a woman as President,” before scripting the campaign ad named “OUR TIME.”

Big Media is the enemy. Some in Big Media who believe the role of the media is to inform the American public have a problem with Trump because of the bias of their own circumstances. For instance the political heavyweight analyst Michael Barone is capable of seeing the bias in himself:

Overall, as I wrote on debate night, I think Clinton won the debate. Perhaps that reflects a professional writer’s prejudice in favor of people who speak, more or less, in whole sentences and paragraphs, and prejudice against those who engage in free-form, parenthetical-filled, free-association discourse. Or perhaps a former political consultant’s bias in favor of candidates who are well prepared. But on reflection and looking over the transcript, I think Trump did a fairly good job of discouraging marginal voters from voting for Clinton, more than I appreciated as I watched the debate.

Barone made that analysis of the first debate. He thought Hillary won but Barone acknowledged his bias favors the conventional candidate who speaks and strategizes in a conventional way, the way Barone would speak and strategize. Unfortunately, Barone let his prejudices and bias cloud his initial response to the first debate. Big Media power wielders should do an analysis based on their initial reactions but temper their reactions with honest assessments “on the other hand”.

Most Big Media writers no longer view their role to inform the public as their responsibility. Big Media today views their role as “not mere stenographers. We decide whose voices to elevate. We amplify information. We generate the narratives that define public discourse… the power of information and those who wield it.”

In this election it is Donald J. Trump and the people against Big Media. Nothing else matters. All else is subordinate. The thirst of the guillotine must be quenched. The ruling political class must be destroyed.

Big Media is the enemy. Power corrupts. Absolute power corrupts absolutely. Big Media is absolutely corrupt. Big Media is the enemy.


349 thoughts on “@SpeakerRyan Is A Dope; Big Media Is The Enemy

  1. http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2016/10/13/where_the_race_stands_with_26_days_to_go.html

    Where the Race Stands With 26 Days to Go [snip]

    After all, it isn’t as if Trump hasn’t been in this position before. In mid-August of 2015, he was down 14 points to Hillary Clinton in the two-way RCP Average; a month later the race was effectively tied. In late April, Trump was down nine points to Clinton; a month later they were effectively tied. In the aftermath of Trump’s comments about Judge Gonzalo Curiel, Clinton’s lead ballooned to sevenpoints; a month later the race again was effectively tied. After the one-two punch of the Democratic National Convention and Trump’s fight with the Khan family, Clinton went up eight points in the RCP Average; a month later the race was effectively tied.

    In other words, Trump has made up larger gaps in similar time periods in the past. If you look at the RCP Average, Clinton hasn’t so much surged as Trump has lost support since the beginning of the month, which suggests those voters are still gettable for him.

    That is because the fundamentals of this race indicate it will be close. The second-term president with middling approval ratings, the modest growth, and the historic unfavorability of the two candidates continually exert gravity on the contest downward to a tie. When Trump is “best behavior” Trump, the race is competitive. When he isn’t, Clinton pulls to a lead. If Trump were to be “best behavior” Trump for the remaining four weeks and conduct himself in the third debate as he did in the second, he might close the gap again. Indeed, the NBC/WSJ poll released over the weekend actually suggests Trump made up some ground in the aftermath of the debate. [snip]

    As for down-ballot Republicans, it puts them in a bind. On the one hand, it seems sensible for them to try and get out of the blast radius as best they can. This, of course, risks losing Trump voters’ support. On the other hand, as one of my friends was fond of saying in law school, “There’s no such thing as a lukewarm hell,” suggesting that since they have already attached themselves to Trump to some degree, they may as well hold on to his supporters and hope for the best. There’s no easy strategic choice for them; we’ll find out whether they make the correct one in 26 days.

    Trende hates Trump and he cites Prussian general Carl von Clausewitz to support his theory that Hillary2016 will fight in “short bursts”. Trende thinks this will work. We don’t because Trump is a counterpuncher and his supporters are strongly with him. There is also another debate to go and this is a change election. In a change election the candidate of change wins.

  2. Peace and prosperity. There’s no prosperity, and soon no peace at all:


    With tensions between Russia and the United States at their highest since the Cold War, there have been alarming signs coming out of Moscow that suggest the country is ready for war.

    Almost no one believes the Kremlin is actually preparing for a military conflict with the United States. Most analysts instead see it as a show, intended to boost support at home and to deter Western countries from intervening militarily in Syria.

    There are some unsettling things Russia has done, however, to give the impression that war is looming:

    As the confrontation between the United and Russia has worsened over Syria, and amid speculation Washington might launch airstrikes against Syrian government forces, Russian state-controlled media has gone into high gear, asking Russians whether they are prepared for nuclear war.

    “If that should one day happen, each of you must know where the nearest bomb shelter is,” a report on the state-controlled network, NTV, noted, before taking viewers on a tour of a nuclear bunker in Moscow. [snip]

    Check Your Gas Masks

    This month Russia held a large-scale civil defense drill across the country, meant to prepare people for disasters, among them nuclear catastrophe. The drill, which Russian authorities claimed affected 40 million people, and particularly the way it was presented on state television, resembled Soviet-era exercises, with scenes of schoolchildren flooding out in evacuations and being taught to hurriedly pull on gas masks.

    Who’s in Charge Here?

    Russia’s defense ministry has announced how the country would function in time of war, clarifying which government bodies would take command. The answer was largely it would, taking control of governor’s offices, local administrations and the police. The military simulated that scenario during a huge exercise in southern Russia.

    The Sound of Saber-Rattling

    The maneuvers took on harder forms as well. This week, Russia deployed nuclear-capable missiles to Kaliningrad, its northern European enclave between Poland and Lithuania that put the weapons within striking distance of Western capitals. Moscow has threatened before to deploy the Iskander-M missiles to Kaliningrad, in response, it says, to the establishment of the U.S. anti-missile shield being erected in Eastern Europe. But this week’s deployment came sooner than expected, with analysts suggesting that indicated the Kremlin wanted to play it as part of the broader saber-rattling display in the confrontation around Syria.

    We’re very concerned about all this. We have a wardrobe crisis. We don’t know what we will wear if there is nuclear war. Black clothes seem a bit much. Yellow too radioactive. Red too hot. Green is too hopeful. We don’t like olive or brown. What do you wear for the apocalypse that is fashionable???

  3. Trende hates Trump and he cites Prussian general Carl von Clausewitz to support his theory that Hillary2016 will fight in “short bursts”. Trende thinks this will work. We don’t because Trump is a counterpuncher and his supporters are strongly with him. There is also another debate to go and this is a change election. In a change election the candidate of change wins.
    Trende, like Cost, is obsolete.

    What tools does he have? Irrelevant history. Phony Polls. And his inside the Beltway prejudices.

    I studied Clausewitz and I could quote other passages that conflict with his.

    Trende ignores the megapolitical significance of escalating disclosures by wiki leaks, project veritas, and those emails.

    And he fails to consider the declining influence of big media, and the increasing influence of social media with the undecideds.

    Now if we could just get Shep out of the Iguana club.

    “Shane . . . come back Shane . . . mommy loves you . . . daddy loves you . . . my dog loves you.”

    “That’s okay Joe. Don’t follow in my footsteps. Grow up to be big and strong.”

    And whatever you do, you young whippersnapper, vote for Trump, and you will have a bright future.”

  4. Admin, you are so good at this. Yes, big media is the enemy, and therefore, so are the big companies that own big media.

    Here is a clip about a former Bill Clinton girlfriend. It is not the whole interview. I did not know who Dolly was. Now I remember her involvement in a story that mentioned how bad Hillary stinks. I never realized that she was the person who had said this about her upon their first meeting.

  5. Admin: Sharyl Attkisson diagnoses the big media problem in her book “Stonewalled”:

    1. “You have these EXECUTIVE PRODUCERS AND SENIOR PRODUCERS in New York who attend the same social gatherings, read the same newspapers, listen to the same radio, go to the same birthday parties for their kids. And they are all trapped in their socio econmomic groups. The real stories are happening in New Mexico, Arizona, Georgia, Alabama, Iowa. But if they have ever been to those places, they have made fun of the people living there.”

    2. “Reporters are little more than casting agents. Entire stories are conceived of by this New York cabal who not only assign us a given topic, but tell us whom we should interview, what they should say, and how the story must be written. We are asked to create a reality that fits their New York image of what they believe, what they have read in places like Huffpost and NYT, or the gossip they have heard at parties.”

    3. “New York tells us to write in our script that the car is red. We tell them it is blue. They insist its red because the AP wire service told them it is red. We tell them we are here on the scene, looking at that car and it is red. Okay, they say. But make it blue.

    4. “We do stories on food stamps but only to prove they are needed. We are not allowed to discuss the waste fraud and abuse.

    5. “We are forced to pass up stories that matter to the American People, such as the collapse of Obamacare, Benghazi, Boeing corruption, massive fraud and waste, horror stories caused by big pharma, the debate over Obama’s use of executive orders, FDA monitoring employee mail, the failure of taxpayer subsidized companies, the dark side of Arab Spring, the border crisis, the debt crisis, the unemployment crisis, etc.

    6. “(The New York cabal) has no trust in their reporters. Instead, they maniacally monitor the New York Times, HuffPo, WashPo, the Daily Beast, and Buzzfeed. They follow the twitter accounts of their favorite bloggers. They watch cable news all day long, and dispatch endless notes to the field on what to report and what to ignore. . . To them, newsgathering consists of gathering and repeating other outlets news, rather than developing their own news from their own reporters.”

    7. Seasoned field reporters and producers who seek to advance a story which is important to the public, are instead relegated to copying or matching what other news outlets have already written, often tasked with reinterviewing the same people who those outlets have already interviewed. It is like painting by the numbers.”

    You can see why big media is so a monolith and their message lacks truth and has become little more than a tower of Babbel.

  6. Trump hater Sean Trende explains why the L.A. Times poll stinks and why it is great and just might be right to the distress of those that dismiss it:


    Why Pay Attention to the L.A. Times Poll? [snip]

    But I can say with confidence that no pollster has engendered as much controversy, or at times outright anger, as the Los Angeles Times’ operation, which has tended to show Donald Trump leading Hillary Clinton. This has happened even as other polls show Clinton in the lead, at times by dramatic margins.

    It’s a little bit odd, to tell the truth. The Times poll is a single survey, generating a two-way result in a year where the four-way average is probably the most relevant. It doesn’t help that the traditional trackers have basically pulled out of the tracking business. This means that the Times poll always has fresh data, and always has the first data available after every event – sometimes the only data available. It also doesn’t help that it is the only poll showing Trump ahead, which inflames liberals and #NeverTrump conservatives. Let’s just say the people sending angry e-mails and tweets about the poll were not doing so this summer when Reuters/Ipsos showed Clinton up by double digits, even as the RealClearPolitics Average showed Trump in a closer race.

    Regardless, you can read a defense of the poll’s methodology here. You should also read this New York Times piece (published as this article was in production), which is a bit overstated in the title, but it does a nice job illustrating how the sometimes-arbitrary decisions of pollsters can have substantial effects on their findings. While you are at it, check out this piece, which makes a similar point.

    My point here is not to debate methodology, it is to answer this question: “If their methodology is so different, why do you pay any attention to them?” The answer is twofold. First, truth is not decided by committee. That is to say, the fact that the L.A. Times pollsters weight their poll in a different manner than other pollsters do doesn’t make them wrong. [snip]

    The Times poll was actually the RAND poll in 2012, and I was concerned about it. [snip]

    Finally, in 2012, much like 2016, the results [from the RAND poll] looked like a pretty significant outlier: [snip]

    In the end, though, the RAND poll basically got it right. The national polls (though not so much the state polls) were off in 2012. During the closing month of the campaign, they showed, on average, a 0.3 point Romney lead. The RAND poll, by contrast, showed a 3.8 point Obama lead – which was almost exactly correct.

    Does that mean the Times poll will be correct this year? Absolutely not. We should treat it as one poll among many, and should note its outlier-ish tendencies. It may be worth watching for trend lines. We might also note that this cycle, it runs contrary to both the national and the state polls, and tends to be off the RCP Average by an even larger margin.

    At the same time, though, we should recall that almost all of the objections lodged against the poll could have been lodged against it in 2012. Many were. The poll may well be flat-out wrong in 2016, but its history cautions heavily against dismissing it outright.

  7. The ironies here are several.

    The cabal preaches diversity, but do not practice it themselves. They are monolithic–racially, socially, politically, economically

    The cabal demonizes white people, even though all of them are white themselves.

    The cabal has no interest in the truth. All they care about is the narrative.

    The cabal constructs the narrative for the sole purpose of enhancing their own wealth and power, at the expense of the rest of us.

    This is why they are rightly described as elite media.


    Newspapers and Workers

    Antonio Gramsci 1916

    The Prison Diaries

    We would like to discuss, with the workers especially, the importance and seriousness of this apparently innocent act, which consists in choosing the newspaper you subscribe to. It is a choice full of snares and dangers which must be made consciously, applying criteria and after mature reflection.

    Above all, the worker must resolutely reject any solidarity with a bourgeois newspaper. And he must always, always, always remember that the bourgeois newspaper (whatever its hue) is an instrument of struggle motivated by ideas and interests that are contrary to his. Everything that is published is influenced by one idea: that of serving the dominant class, and which is ineluctably translated into a fact: that of combating the laboring class. And in fact, from the first to the last line the bourgeois newspaper smells of and reveals this preoccupation.

    But the beautiful – that is the ugly – thing is this: that instead of asking for money from the bourgeois class to support it in its pitiless work in its favor, the bourgeois newspapers manage to be paid by…the same laboring classes that they always combat. And the laboring class pays; punctually, generously.

    Hundreds of thousands of workers regularly and daily give their pennies to the bourgeois newspapers, thus assisting in creating their power. Why? If you were to ask this of the first worker you were to see on the tram or the street with a bourgeois paper spread before him you would hear: “Because I need to hear about what happening.” And it would never enter his head that the news and the ingredients with which it is cooked are exposed with an art that guides his ideas and influences his spirit in a given direction. And yet he knows that this newspaper is opportunist, and that one is for the rich, that the third, the fourth, the fifth is tied to political groups with interests diametrically opposed to his.

    And so every day this same worker is able to personally see that the bourgeois newspapers tell even the simplest of facts in a way that favors the bourgeois class and damns the working class and its politics. Has a strike broken out? The workers are always wrong as far as the bourgeois newspapers are concerned. Is there a demonstration? The demonstrators are always wrong, solely because they are workers they are always hotheads, rioters, hoodlums. The government passes a law? It’s always good, useful and just, even if it’s…not. And if there’s an electoral, political or administrative struggle? The best programs and candidates are always those of the bourgeois parties.

    And we’re aren’t even talking about all the facts that the bourgeois newspapers either keep quiet about, or travesty, or falsify in order to mislead, delude or maintain in ignorance the laboring public. Despite this, the culpable acquiescence of the worker to the bourgeois newspapers is limitless. We have to react against this and recall the worker to the correct evaluation of reality. We have to say and repeat that the pennies tossed there distractedly into the hands of the newsboy are projectiles granted to a bourgeois newspaper, which will hurl it, at the opportune moment, against the working masses.

    If the workers were to be persuaded of this most elementary of truths they would learn to boycott the bourgeois press with the same unity and discipline that the bourgeoisie boycott the newspapers of the workers, that is, the Socialist press. Don’t give financial assistance to the bourgeois press, which is your adversary. This is what should be our battle cry in this moment that is characterized by the subscription campaigns of all the bourgeois newspapers. Boycott them, boycott them, boycott them!

  8. NeverTrump idiots say “too bad Trump won the nomination if not we would be 20 points ahead.” Trump is the only one that ever had a chance this election season because he represents true change. Not-a-fan of Trump, John Hinderaker, explains:


    Some will say–I may have said–that Republican primary voters asked for it by nominating a man with obvious personal vulnerabilities, instead of a more upright (and more electable) Marco Rubio, John Kasich, Ted Cruz or whoever.

    But what’s a Republican to do? Last cycle, we nominated the ultimate Boy Scout: Mitt Romney. Whatever you think of Romney from a policy perspective, he is as admirable a man as you will ever meet. To find a presidential candidate of better moral character, you probably have to go back to Abraham Lincoln and George Washington. Romney never said a rude word about a woman in his life.

    So what happened? Did Romney and the GOP get credit in the press for the candidates’s outstanding character? No. Romney, who helped to create tens of thousands of jobs at Bain Capital, was denounced as a “vulture capitalist” and blamed, absurdly, for one woman’s developing cancer. The Washington Post made a front page story of the fact that 50 years earlier, when he was in high school, he and others had cut a classmate’s hair. Oh, and Romney was a racist, too. Does anyone remember why? I don’t.

    The cycle before that, GOP voters nominated John McCain. McCain is a great patriot, a man of extraordinary character and courage who survived years of torture and abuse as a prisoner of war in Vietnam. Did the liberal media give Republicans credit for nominating such a hero? No. The New York Times, to its everlasting shame, peddled a false rumor that McCain had an affair with a lobbyist.

    Remember the “binders full of women” attack on Romney. Romney said he had “binders full of women” he would consider for employment. This was turned into proof that Romney hated women.

    Romney caved when he was attacked. As did Hillary in 2008. As did McCain in 2008. Trump fights. Trump fights hard. That’s why Trump can never be counted out. Trump fights and Trump enjoys the fight. You can’t win if you don’t fight. Trump fights and that’s why he wins.

  9. The attempted overthrow of the country is what we are witnessing. Call him a conspiracy theorist, but he gets it right here.

  10. I’ve yet to read this latest gift from Big Pink, and choose first to send a mea culpa comment to mcnorman regarding Jill Stein.

    First up to me on twitter this morning is this:
    “On CSPAN Jill Stein subtly endorsed Trump”

    Last night I viewed Scranton ABC affiliate air a Dana Bash hit on Ivanka of all people.

    Ivanka was doing child care in Philly. At least one of the settings was high class.
    I’ll omit most of the rude details, and mention just this: Dana was aired chasing after Donald’s elder daughter shouting “What about the video?”
    Ivanka kept walking.

  11. Early voting has started. They are supposedly sending bus loads of people out to vote multiple times in different voting districts already. No voter ID = no problem.

  12. Donald Trump Cannot Be Brought Down By The Hillary-Loving Mainstream Media – Nathan McDonald
    By Nathan McDonald

    October 13, 2016

    It’s no news to anyone that Trump is facing some rough times. He is fighting the entire Democratic party, traitors within the ranks of the Republican party, and just about the entire Mainstream Media. It is clear to both sides that the “system” is out to discredit and smear the Trump name.

    What isn’t so clear, especially if all you do is watch MSM garbage, is the fact that Donald Trump cannot be brought down. This movement is bigger than Trump and the people have had enough. No matter what his enemies do, his support continues to grow.

    Therefore, it was no surprise to his supporters to see the recent polls come out today. After experiencing what many are calling “the greatest debate victory in history”, the numbers are finally starting to trickle in and they are showing a complete and utter reversal of Hillary’s momentum. The LA Times poll, one of the most accurate in former elections, has Clinton and Trump in a virtual tie.


  13. a little Saturday morning humor.. don’t know which is funnier, the pic, or, Diamond and Silk’s laughter.

  14. what i find particularly offensive is all of these women suddenly coming out of the woodworks saying that Donald groped them…

    first of all…I have seen Donald at many rallys where he will give someone a hug or even a kiss (remember that Colombian woman who got on stage with him…he almost missed her forehead)…a quick innocent peck…I even saw him give a few men a quick peck in the midst of an introduction at a rally…

    that is not being groped or sexually assaulted…

    if one has to worry about every time they have put their hand on someone’s shoulder or given them an impulsive hug and worry that down the road that could be construed as unwanted sexual assaults…this is RIDICULOUS…that kind of behavior, along with “air kisses” is very common in entertainment and other powerful circles…

    sexual assault is when you have sex with someone against their will…more in line with what Bill has been accused of…

    so now all these woman that might have gotten an innocent hug, a pat on the shoulder, a little peck of an innocent kiss…or one of the more absurd who says that Donald may have “nudged” her in a crowd… now want to label this man a sexual deviant…

    this is disgusting…it really waters down what the serious offense of sexual assault is

    …and further in the quest for truth…let’s just be honest…especially in places like LA and NYC…there are many women who throw themselves at rich men…or men in power…many use drugs…especially during the 80’s & 90’s and those times were wild…that is the time period these women are complaining about…

    give me a break…

    I am so disgusted with the Democrats…they are so deceptive and dishonest…so desperate to keep power and control of our money so they can continue to squander it on their friends…


    c-span 1 is covering the rally now…sessions is speaking

  15. James O’Keefe needs to catch a few of the voter busses going from poll to poll on video and show the nation the corruption in our current voting system

    the bastards need to be caught in the act of mass cheating.

  16. There is one important think you need to remember about Donald J. Trump:

    Donald Trump does not drink (or drug).

    This is important because sexual abuse goes with substance abuse. Our last three POTUS have had issues. Can you image how different the Billy Bushwacker tape would have been if Trump had “had a few” when he met the bait?

    A sober man with a gorgeous wife is not likely to be groping around. The entertainment/playboy image stuff is of minimal substance.

  17. Sharing is caring:
    EMAILID 10286 They are discussing the candidacy of Jeb! “Jeb Bush is also spending candidate money on top of PAC money starting next week in NH only so far – currently booking 9/9-9/29 (3 weeks). We haven’t seen creative yet for this, but would assume it would come down on Tuesday. We do not have a big chunk of the spending yet, but should have when stations re-open on Tuesday.” They were very worried about and very closely following the moves of Jeb! as the supposed nominee of the Republicans (LOL). They didn’t know he was low energy at this time. https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/10286

    EMAILID 11011 The title of this one is: Goldman Sachs paid speeches “” It has some transcripts, three speeches titled GS1, GS2, GS3. From GS2 about the poor banks: “I mean, right now, there are so many places in our country where the banks are not doing what they need to do because they’re scared of regulations, they’re scared of the other shoe dropping, they’re just plain scared, so credit is not flowing the way it needs to to restart economic growth.” Poor scared banks, they really need a helping hand from government. Another excerpt from GS3 ” MALE ATTENDEE: My question is, as entrepreneurs, we risk a lot. And Mike Bloomberg had 30 billion other reasons than to take office. Do we need a wholesale change in Washington that has more to do with people that don’t need the job than have the job? SECRETARY CLINTON: That’s a really interesting question. You know, I would like to see more successful business people run for office. I really would like to see that because I do think, you know, you don’t have to have 30 billion, but you have a certain level of freedom.” Crooked Hillary wanted Trump to run for office!! https://wikileaks.com/podesta-emails/emailid/11011#efmA5-A9Y

    EMAILID 10275 Gathering information on Juanita Broaddrick, who accused Bill Clinton of raping her. They likely want to destroy Broaddrick to neutralize her accusation, which creates the public image that Bill Clinton is a rapist. David Kendall writes : “The first is the affidavit and cover letter from her lawyer. This document makes clear that Broaddrick is indeed “Jane Doe #5” in the Paula Jones suit. I believe this has been unsealed but before we release it publicly, I’d need to check.” – So this guy is gathering documents and sending them to Podesta BEFORE he checked whether it was unsealed or not. It’s OK if I send it by email, I’m sure nobody will find out… https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/10275

    EMAILID 10353 Reporters on the Clinton campaign bus accepted off-the-record parties at the home of John Pedesta. “Thursday night, April 9th at 7:00p.m. Dinner at the Home of John Podesta. This will be with about 20 reporters who will closely cover the campaign (aka the bus).” Were they bribing them with lavish parties for better coverage or they were simply thanking them for services already rendered? https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/10353#efmAGzAHJAHUAHiAIYAI6AJ0ALLAL7AM0ANzAOp

    EMAILID 10728 Brent Budowsky triumphantly reports to John Podesta that he finished his latest article. It is titled “The Magic of Bill Clinton”. Brent writes to Podesta in the subject line “Hope this helps” Podesta’s response? “Yep”. By the way here is an archive link to the article Budowsky wrote http://archive.is/ayD4m to “help out” the Clinton campaign. Let’s preserve the evidence much unlike Director Comey did with the contents of Cherly Mills’ laptop (destroyed). https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/10728

    EMAILID 10587 Discussion of the Top Secret emails that were on the Clinton private server. 2015 November. Podesta and others are hoping that a NYT story about these Top Secret emails will not get confirmed. https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/10587

    EMAILID 10530 More media collusion and abuse #CorruptMedia . It’s like some reporters are actually working for the Clinton campaign directly. Reuters reporter Mark Hosenball going to John Podesta with a document he obtained. Did he get it from a source in confidence? Was he given the document during his work as a journalist? Who knows, but he is very determined to get the information he obtained as a journalist to the Clinton machine: “I have run across a rather interesting document which outlines in detail the principal current objectives of the House Benghazi Committee, and was wondering if you might have a minute or two to discuss this. If you are anywhere near 1333 H in next day or two I might even show the document to you” https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/10530#efmATAAby

    EMAILID 10313 In response to a NYPost tweet suggesting Bloomberg gaining support to run for president. Neera Tanden and Howard Wolfson begin a conversation. Bloomberg running would create huge problems for the Hillary campaign. (Note how the first instinct of these people are to try to bribe their way out of a problem with offering positions) 2015 June, Neera Tanden-“Is there something Mike Bloomberg would want to do in his life in an Admin? Is like Ambassador to China way too small?” Howard Wolfson- “Secty of state Which ain’t gonna happen” Tanden “Something to know for down the road.” . So Bloomberg wants to be Secretary of State, but it won’t happen (guess that position is already sold to someone else?) https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/10313#efmANfAPXAU5AVF

  18. I just watched Trump in New Hampshire. He’s going to be in Maine in 1.5 hrs.

    He seemed pretty tired. Poor guy. How long has he been doing this? 18 months? I would have looked like that 17.5 months ago….

  19. Leaked Emails Reveals Clinton Campaign Plotted Supreme Court Threat Over Obamacare

    While it’s fairly disturbing that the Clinton team would flippantly admit such things, what’s even worse is that they plotted to use Obama’s same strategy of applying political pressure on the Supreme Court in 2015 to overturn “King v Burwell” which also threatened Obamacare’s future.

    The email below from Neera Tanden, clearly shows Clinton staffers colluding with the President of the Center for American Progress on a scheme to apply political pressure on the Supreme Court to overturn the challenge.

    Interesting reading…the stunning corruption of HRC makes my blood BOIL!

  20. Thanks McNorman for the links to the Podesta emails. We will try to do a Wikileaks summary before the Wednesday debate and your post helps a great deal.

  21. Mrs. Smith1
    October 15, 2016 at 2:43 pm
    Leaked Emails Reveals Clinton Campaign Plotted Supreme Court Threat Over Obamacare
    The globalists have already got their agents on the Supreme Court.

    Oh, that’s just nonsense. Where do you get these wild crazy notions.

    From the Supreme Court Justice who told Matt Drudge you are through.

    A Justice who has speculated too much deference to international law

    And has shown too little regard for our Constitution

    A Boston Brahman, no surprise that

    If you know the court at all, it should not be hard to guess who this is

    So if they are already on the court, they needed to eliminate one of the conservative justices

    Scalia dies suddenly, no autopsy and two days earlier, Podestra alludes to an assassination in his “wet works”email.

    And put in one more of their klingons to tip the balance in favor of the globalists.

    After the election and before the inauguration, it is not unlikely that McConnell enable them—like he always does.

    We have got to find a way around this, for the nation to survive.

    Of course, I’m just a ‘ guess’n.

  22. If Trump wins, and gets the man he needs as speaker of the house, who cares about the senate. Trump wins the presidency, hold the House with his own man–not Ryan as speaker, and they lose the Senate, then the RINOs who control that body will go the way of the dinosaur. Meanwhile, Trump will hold the whip hand.

  23. And by the way, RINOs desperate to save the senate are telling us that if the lose, Bernie Sanders will be the speaker. They need to talk to greeezy Chuck Schumer about that one, because he has the votes in their caucus. If the public has any sense, they would fear Schumer more that Bernie. Bernie would be blocked and tackeled by wall street, and he is not in line. It is a phony breadcrumb cast to his forelorn supporters and it will not work.

  24. Our elites, who are forever charging others with “racism, sexism, homophobia, xenophobia,” are steeped in their own bigotries — toward Southerners, conservatives, Middle Americans, Evangelical Christians, and traditionalist Catholics — the “irredeemables.”

    Though the election is still a month off, the campaign of 2016 has already done irreparable damage to the American establishment.

    Its roots in the nation it purports to lead have been attenuated if not severed. It has shown the world a portrait of American democracy at its apex that approaches the repellent.

    Through the savagery of its attacks on those who have risen up against it, the establishment has stripped itself of all claim to be the moral leader of American society. Its moral authority is gone.

    Even if Clinton wins, it can no longer credibly speak for America.

    As for the national press corps — the Fourth Estate — it has been compromised, its credibility crippled, as some of the greatest of the press institutions have nakedly shilled for the regime candidate, while others have been exposed as propagandists or corrupt collaborators posturing as objective reporters.

    What institution in America today, besides the military, enjoys national respect? And if people do not respect the regime, if they believe it acts in its own cold interest rather than the nation’s, why should they respect or follow its leadership?

    We have entered uncharted waters.


  25. Democracy is struggling in America–by now this statement is almost cliché. But what if the country is no longer a democracy at all? In Democracy Incorporated, Sheldon Wolin considers the unthinkable: has America unwittingly morphed into a new and strange kind of political hybrid, one where economic and state powers are conjoined and virtually unbridled? Can the nation check its descent into what the author terms “inverted totalitarianism”?

    Wolin portrays a country where citizens are politically uninterested and submissive–and where elites are eager to keep them that way. At best the nation has become a “managed democracy” where the public is shepherded, not sovereign. At worst it is a place where corporate power no longer answers to state controls. Wolin makes clear that today’s America is in no way morally or politically comparable to totalitarian states like Nazi Germany, yet he warns that unchecked economic power risks verging on total power and has its own unnerving pathologies. Wolin examines the myths and mythmaking that justify today’s politics, the quest for an ever-expanding economy, and the perverse attractions of an endless war on terror. He argues passionately that democracy’s best hope lies in citizens themselves learning anew to exercise power at the local level.

    Democracy Incorporated is one of the most worrying diagnoses of America’s political ills to emerge in decades. It is sure to be a lightning rod for political debate for years to come.

    In a new preface, Wolin describes how the Obama administration, despite promises of change, has left the underlying dynamics of managed democracy intact.

  26. The history here is fascinating.

    Whether it has any application to the current situation

    As portrayed by Buchanan, and

    As manifested in Wikileaks, and

    As revealed in the 33,000 emails which Mike Cernovich has

    Readers will decide for themselves

  27. Admin and mxnoeman-

    A few more WikiLeaks to add to the list from Breitbart:

    October 15, 2016 at 12:45 pm

    Hillary team had been planning DonaldTrump sex scandal smear 4 months 2 deflect attention from disastrous email leaks that they knew would sink them if in the media.


    Here is a rundown of some of the biggest bombshells dropped by WikiLeaks’ disclosure of Hillary Clinton’s speeches and emails, and why each is so important.

    1. Clinton dreams of a world with “open trade and open borders”: Every American should understand that Democrats, and plenty of Republicans, are fighting an all-out war against national sovereignty. Sure, Democrats want new voters, and Republican interests want cheap labor, but they also share a mutual desire to increase the distance between the Ruling Class and voters. In the globalist future, political and business titans will stand atop the world, without having to worry about fulfilling annoying duties to grubby little voters with nostalgic memories of the days when American politicians served America’s interests. Globalism means you’ll never be able to vote against anything.

    2. Clinton courted business elites to support liberal agenda to beat back populism: Clinton’s speeches include numerous examples of something that’s hardly new, or unique to her, but a very important harbinger of things to come if she gets into the White House. Democrats serve their voters a steady stream of anti-business, anti-wealth rhetoric, but they’re keenly interested in using Big Business to promote the agenda of Big Government. Some of the examples in the leaked speeches, such as Clinton urging business interests to beat back the Tea Party and support open-borders immigration, are points of common interest with the GOP Establishment.

    3. Clinton campaign coordinated with Super PAC: No one familiar with the WikiLeaks disclosures should be able to restrain their laughter when Hillary Clinton talks about getting “big money” and “dark money” out of politics. Then again, she should have been laughed off the stage for such tirades long before WikiLeaks started releasing her campaign’s emails.

    4. Clinton admitted she has different “public and private positions” on Wall Street reform: Again, this shouldn’t surprise anyone, but it’s always useful to catch a politician actually admitting she isn’t honest with the public on issues – especially an issue of keen interest to the Democrats who opposed her in the primary. In the same issue, she admitted she’s out of touch with ordinary Americans and “far removed” from middle-class life, which is a refreshing bit of (unintended) candor from such a sanctimonious candidate and Party. Lastly, she said it was an “oversimplification” to blame banks for the 2008 financial meltdown, which is true – and greatly understating the truth of Democrat politicians’ culpability, at that – but not at all what Democrat hyper-partisans want to hear from their leaders.

    5. Clinton campaign asked about using White House executive privilege to hide emails from Congress: “Think we should hold emails to and from POTUS? That’s the heart of his exec privilege. We could get them to ask for that,” John Podesta – current Clinton campaign chair, and former White House counsel – wrote to Hillary’s aide Cheryl Mills, even as the House Benghazi Committee was writing a subpoena for Clinton’s long-hidden correspondence. It’s absolutely shocking that Team Clinton would think Barack Obama was willing to abuse executive privilege to hide vital information from Congress. Wherever did they get that outrageous idea?

    6. Clinton campaign looked for political support from “needy Latinos”: This is the perfect example of an email chain that would set the media on fire, if it came from a Republican political campaign. They seem to have been talking about Latino politicians who were needy, rather than herds of Latino voters, but they were colorfully insulting to some of those politicians.

    7. Collusion with State Department on managing Clinton’s email scandal: It’s pretty clear from these emails that Clinton’s team knew she broke the law, but they were (justifiably) confident they could trump the rule of law with politics… and plenty of help from their good friends in the Obama Administration. Other emails illustrate the Clinton team’s conviction that all Democrat scandals can be overcome with distractions and delaying tactics, counting on that 90% Democrat media to be easily distracted, and to stay quiet while stonewalls are constructed. You will see more collusion and stonewalling in future Democrat Administrations, building on the precedents Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton established. The next Republican Administration that tries it will get a swift and brutal lesson in why scandal management only works when the administrative state and media support the party in power.

    8. “Journalists” secretly working as enthusiastic volunteers for Clinton/Kaine 2016: Another one to file under “no big surprise, but still nice to see it on paper.” The American public needs to understand there is no real division between the government and media when a Democrat is in the White House, especially with this particular Democrat. The press loved Barack Obama and was childishly easy for him to spin at will, even during the queasy Fifty Shades of Grey stages of their romantic relationship, but the press is Hillary Clinton’s campaign. They’re her donors, Clinton Foundation contributors, and often her former (and future!) employees. If you didn’t think the media could be less interested in holding a president accountable than Obama, you’re in for a shock if Clinton wins.

    9. Planting the “seeds of revolution” in the “Middle Ages dictatorship” of the Catholic Church: Democrats view Christians in almost exactly the terms they adamantly refuse to apply to Islamic supremacists. They’re also very determined to infiltrate institutions that resist liberalism, subverting them from within, and destroying them if they refuse to be subverted. Check out the latest news about the National Football League for another example.

    10. Clinton Cash panicked the campaign: They knew how bad this stuff was, and they wasted no time devising strategies to spin it away. They didn’t have much trouble convincing the press to stop bugging Clinton about the galaxy of Clinton Foundation scandals, did they? With Republicans, the media works hard to set up denials that look uncomfortable, or which they think can be demolished by later revelations. With Democrats, not so much.

    11. Flip-flopping on TPP: It’s amazing than a single Sanders voter ever believed Clinton was honest about opposing the Trans-Pacific Partnership, but evidently most of them did, or else they never really cared about the issue as much as they claimed to. Leaked emails reveal how Clinton was not “comfortable” with attacking the trade deal she once gushed over as the “gold standard” for such agreements, but she knew she had to pretend to oppose it to placate union bosses and woo the Sanderistas. Clinton campaign staff talked about her “integrity” as though it were a stack of poker chips, deeming it reasonable to sacrifice a little integrity to keep the Sanders insurrection under control.

    12. Gun control: cherry-picked data and executive orders: Democrats are going to lose patience with voter opposition to their gun control agenda and begin imposing it, as soon as they no longer have to worry about losing a tough election in the near future. They often worry about the potential backlash from Democrat voters in key states who support gun rights, but they’ll stop worrying about that soon, especially if Clinton does extremely well in those states. A packed Supreme Court will make her even bolder about chipping away at the Second Amendment. No one should be surprised that Democrats like to pick and choose which crimes the public should focus upon, in order to sell the gun control agenda.

    13. Special favors for “Friends of Bill” in Haiti: The Clintons’ use of Haiti as a cash machine was disgusting. The hypocrisy of liberals willing to ignore this carnival of corruption, at the expense of an impoverished black nation, to slip the Clintons back into the White House is unbearable. The corruption of the State Department into a wholly owned subsidiary of Clinton, Inc. should be completely unacceptable.

    14. Iran nuclear deal was “greatest appeasement since Chamberlain gave Czechoslovakia to Hitler”: This email chain quotes Republican Senator Mark Kirk of Illinois saying Obama’s nuclear deal “condemns the next generation to cleaning up a nuclear war in the Persian Gulf,” and Clinton campaign chief John Podesta responding, “Yup.” While the Democrats figure out how to spin that away, the rest of us can reflect that Clinton, Podesta, and other old hands in her inner circle probably have significant differences of opinion with Barack Obama and his teenage-punk approach to foreign policy. Obama and his weird little gang of young advisers thought it would be a great idea to do the opposite of everything his predecessors did, Republican and Democrat alike. The Clinton group worked in one of those preceding Administrations. However, Mrs. Clinton and all of her loyal retainers were willing to stifle their objections to Obama’s foreign policy in the name of party loyalty… even when those objections hinted at a future nuclear war.

    15. Clinton wanted to run against Donald Trump in 2016: The three Republican candidates Clinton’s campaign thought they had the best chance of beating were Trump, Ben Carson, and Senator Ted Cruz. “We need to be elevating the Pied Piper candidates so that they are leaders of the pack and tell the press to them seriously,” said a memo sent to the Democratic National Committee. They were quite confident of their ability to tell the press which Republican candidates it should take seriously.

    16. Clinton knew Libya was a disaster: Her hindsight about the bloody, world-destabilizing fallout from the overthrow of Qaddafi, and the inability of the new Libyan government to provide security for Americans, was 20/20… but what good does that do anyone, especially the Americans who died in Benghazi? It’s laughable to hear Clinton and her supporters brag about her great resume. Her resume is the world outside your window, and what she says about it to her big donors is very different from what she says to the general public.

    17. “Foreign govt donors: all the money is in”: The Clinton team is much more relaxed about discussing big bucks from overseas among themselves. They don’t want the public thinking about how much support Clinton gets from foreign interests, or dwelling on how unsavory some of those interests are. They were reluctant to disclose all of those foreign donors to the Obama Administration as they promised. But the leaked emails show they’re very well aware of how important that imported cash is. This particular email seems to concern locking down foreign financial support for the Clinton Foundation, in case Mrs. and Mr. Clinton find themselves back in the White House next year.

    18. Clinton Foundation audit reveals it may have misled the IRS: One of the perks of Clintonhood is that you can file taxes incorrectly, suffer no penalties whatsoever, and refile the paperwork years later. A 2011 audit of the Clinton Foundation requested by Chelsea Clinton discovered that, despite sworn statements to the IRS, the Foundation didn’t write or enforce the required conflict-of-interest policy… and, wouldn’t you know it, some conflicts of interest do seem to have cropped up! Two years later, long after Hillary Clinton resigned as Secretary of State, gift acceptance policies were still a work in progress.




    Each one of the bullet points has the full story behind it. i’ll post an example on the next post.

  28. sorry for the typo mcnorman. Didn’t mean to misspell your name. The puter is running at a delay. Even missed bolding a few headers..

    Exclusive — Sen. Jeff Sessions on WikiLeaks Revelation of Hillary Clinton’s Support for ‘Open Borders’: ‘It’s a Smoking Gun

    NEW YORK CITY, New York — Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-AL), the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee’s subcommittee on Immigration and the National Interest, thinks the paid speech transcripts of Hillary Clinton revealing she supports open borders are a “smoking gun” in this election.

    “It’s a smoking gun,” Sessions told Breitbart News Daily on SiriusXM 125 The Patriot Channel on Thursday morning when asked for his reaction to the revelation.

    “Years ago it finally dawned on me: I used to say, and still do, the Democrats and liberals will pass any immigration bill as long as it doesn’t work,” Sessions said.

    He continued:

    What does that mean? It means they have never wanted a lawful system of immigration. They have frustrated it at every turn. They say they do, for 30 years they have promised and Republicans have promised to produce a lawful system of immigration. They’ve had multiple opportunities to do so with the American people supporting them overwhelmingly. But have they done it? No. Why? Just what that email reveals. She doesn’t do it because she believes in open borders.

    That’s where they want to take our country. They don’t believe in borders. This is a deep philosophical question and the answer is crystal clear. You can’t operate in this world today with open borders. Give me a break. You could spend hours explaining why. They never say it publicly because they know they can’t defend it.

    So this is an incredible revealing statement that she is going to the American people right now claiming that Donald Trump made errors 10 or 20 years ago whereas she is perpetuating one of the greatest false campaigns ever saying she is going to have a lawful system of immigration when she has no intention whatsoever to do so.

    WikiLeaks, in the first email dump of now six total dumps of Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta’s hacked emails, found partial transcripts of Hillary Clinton’s position is in favor of open borders.

    “My dream is a hemispheric common market, with open trade and open borders, some time in the future with energy that is as green and sustainable as we can get it, powering growth and opportunity for every person in the hemisphere,” Hillary Clinton said on May 16, 2013, in a paid speech to Banco Itau, according to the leaked Podesta documents.

    Sessions that her remarks being for “open trade” were just as revealing as her support for “open borders.”

    “This is because she views the future here in the Western Hemisphere and really worldwide, but initially she mentioned here, but her view is like the European Union—that the British just finally desperately extracted themselves from before they got sucked in it so deeply that their own laws cease to have meaning and that the people who have ruled them they can’t control because they’re in Brussels and not at home, not the people they elected,” Session said on Breitbart News Daily.

    He added:

    So what she indicated there is that she wants a Hemispheric-wide—she didn’t indicate it, she flat out admitted it, she wants a Hemispheric-wide common market which is the way the European Union formed. And she wants free movement of people and free movement of goods. This is indefensible. That’s why she denies it.

    That’s why she flipped on the Trans Pacific Partnership trade deal that’s a five thousand page deal that’s probably the largest one in our history—it is the largest one in our history—and she supported it consistently. As Secretary of State, she helped write the dadgum thing. So give me a break. She’s praised it. CNN found she praised it 44 times.

    A top Asian policy adviser who some say would be the next Secretary of State in her administration told Australians last summer that she may have said that but they’re going to pass it anyway and now we have the WikiLeaks thing that proves beyond all doubt that on this critical issue she is flat lying to the American people. She intends to move forward. She’ll make a few cosmetic changes, say the thing is fixed, and try to move it through Congress. That’s just what’s going to happen. It’s a fundamental lie.

    Sessions framed this election as a referendum election on the important issues of the day, and said that because GOP presidential nominee Donald Trump is “standing firm” he is “taking the slings and arrows for us” as a result of the fact he “threatens the establishment.”

    “The bottom line is Donald Trump is right on trade, he’s right on immigration, he’s right on judges and the rule of law, he’s right on Obamacare’s failure and how people are suffering under this rigged system to the detriment of their concerns, their interests, while in secret Hillary Clinton and a lot of other establishment politicians meet with rich global interests and serve them when the chips are down and not the American people,” Sessions said.

    He explained:

    This is—for me—this is how I got into this whole thing. It’s a deep problem. The leadership in this country has drifted globalist. They’ve lost sight of the interests of and struggles of American working people.

    Working people’s pleas to their government are right and just. They’re not mean and stupid. They believe in a lawful system of immigration, and that’s right and just. They believe in a system of immigration that protects their jobs and wages first, that when we have a job vacancy here the first thing we do is give a chance to American worker here not bringing in someone from abroad.

    My goodness, who do we owe our loyalty to? So they’re right about that. They’re right to be concerned about trade. I’ve done study on it. I’ve supported trade deals in the past, but we’ve done research: The results of these agreements are hurting the American people just like they thought when it passed. The American people never believed in these things yet the experts said we should do it and it was done by their leaders and the results are in.


  29. Admin:

    Can you open this link up?

    General Flynn has authorized this reporter to talk generally about what the Trump internals show, moving forward to election day

    These polls are not the 200 people mainstream media selects on a random basis and over samples democrats

    This poll measures the support of two thousand voters with varying political views from different parts of the country who they have been polling for over a year.

    It shows Trump surging on election day.

    The hard sell of toxic stuff by big media is backfiring on them, since this election is also a referendum on them, since they are joined at the hip with the Clinton campaign.

    Toward the end of the tape, the reporter talks about a meeting of globalists bankers that he sneaked into earlier in the day, and how they are sketching out the New World Order after Hillary is elected, and how they will punish nations that refuse to go along with it. The threat of nuclear war against Russia by the Obama administration broadcast by his stooges in mainstream media is an example of this, under the big lie that Russia is interfering in our elections.

    Finally, he alludes to the sophisticated anti-steal strategy which Trump supporters have launched, including intelligence people, military people and hackers who are determined to stop this globalist coup.

    Don’t take my word. See for yourself:

  30. That didn’t take long.. Sessions spoke out in our defense now Soros is gunning for him..

    please read:

    George Soros cash behind move to smear, oust Jeff Sessions from key committee

    With less than one month before the 2016 election, it’s no secret that anyone and everyone surrounding Donald Trump has become a target for media fodder. So if you think the negative, liberal-driven press against Senator Jeff Sessions has been more intense than usual this week, there’s a reason for that.

    Following Sunday night’s presidential debate, the Alabama Senator took to the spin room to address Trump’s positions. He was frequently asked about that infamous 11-year-old Trump recording, in which the Republican nominee was caught making lewd remarks about women.

    It was during an interview with the Weekly Standard, a magazine whose leaders have championed the “Never Trump” movement, that the Sessions was asked to respond to the comments. He told the publication that Trump’s language was “improper,” but should not be labeled as sexual assault. The interviewer pressed him further, prompting Sessions to answer that “it’s not clear” how an assault would occur.

    Sessions has since made it abundantly evident that he does not condone Trump’s 2005 statements, nor does he believe that sexual assault is in any way excusable.

    “My hesitation was based solely on confusion of the contents of the 2005 tape and the hypothetical posed by the reporter, which was asked in a chaotic post-debate environment,” Senator Sessions said in a statement. “I regret that it resulted in an inaccurate article that misrepresented my views. Of course it’s crystal clear that assault is unacceptable. I would never intentionally suggest otherwise.”

    Now, a radical, far-left feminist group known as UltraViolet is promoting a petition that calls for Senator Sessions’ removal from the powerful Senate Judiciary Committee. So far, the petition has gained over 40,000 signatures. It’s actually a low number compared to other outrage-based campaigns the group has waged. Other current petitions include one that urges NBC to fire entertainment host Billy Bush, while another demands federal protection for Planned Parenthood.

    The organization merits a deeper look.

    UltraViolet is headed-up by Nita Chaudhary and Kat Barr, two former high-level political directors of the liberal attack machine MoveOn.org. Like MoveOn, UltraViolet is also funded by liberal mastermind billionaire George Soros. (The same guy who also donated at least $6 million to Hillary Clinton’s campaign, $1 million to Planned Parenthood, $650,000 to Black Lives Matter, just to name a few.)

    The petition was expectedly carried and promoted by liberal sites, but in a surprising turn, has also received recognition from right-leaning RedState, who- like the Weekly Standard- has strong ties to the Never Trump movement. Even they conceded that UltraViolet exclusively targets “conservatives and Republicans and attack them as being opposed to women” in order to further a false “war on women.”

    Senator Sessions nor his base of conservative supporters seem to be giving the petition any credence.

    “Senator Sessions has served honorably for many years on the Judiciary Committee as the defender of our liberties and a champion of our values,” Sen. Sessions’ Chief of Staff Rick Dearborn said. “I certainly hope no one is fooled by this effort. I don’t think anyone would honestly suggest he be removed, particularly based on a pitch by George Soros.”


  31. a point of interest…

    this area is supposed to be the bluest of the blue in Florida…yet when I drive around I see Trump-Pence signs, banners, bumper stickers and today when I was in Home Depot I saw a very happy and smiling lady wearing a Trump-Pence t-shirt…

    I have also seen Trump supporters waving flags on street corners with cars driving by and honking horns to them and giving them thumbs up…

    conversely, I have not see one sign, banner, bumper sticker…anything…anything at all…that shows any support for Hillary…

    this is supposed to be her territory…you would never know it…

    i am wondering if any of you are seeing this where you live…is anyone seeing any support for Hillary? how about for DT

  32. I am not seeing much of either. Just a few Trump bumper stickers and some old Bernie ones. I have had several people coming around looking for my 18-year-old daughter who is a Hillary supporter. She is away at school.

    It is like Hillary does not need voters. She has the machines.

  33. We warned about this at the time before the vote in Iowa but Hillary2008 did not listen. For those that investigated the 2008 election or remember the 2008 election:


    Two attorneys with close ties to the Clinton family believe then-Sen. Barack Obama’s 2008 campaign “flooded” the caucuses with “ineligible voters,” according to leaked emails.

    Emails hacked from Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton’s campaign manager John Podesta cites two attorneys and “old friends of the Clintons,” James Lyons and Michael Driver, tasked with “caucus protection, election protection and to raise hard $” for the 2016 Colorado caucus.

    Apparently, Lyons and Driver didn’t want a repeat of 2008 when, they believe, the Obama campaign “flooded the caucuses with ineligible voters,” according to the email chain released by WikiLeaks. It’s unclear if they are only talking about the Colorado caucus or those in other states.

    “High importance,” Podesta wrote to campaign staffers in a May 2015 email.

    “I met with Jim and Mike in Denver,” Podesta wrote. “They are both old friends of the Clintons and have lots of experience. Mike hosted our Boulder Road Show event. They are reliving the 08 caucuses where they believe the Obama forces flooded the caucuses with ineligible voters. They want to organize lawyers for caucus protection, election protection and to raise hard $. They are not just Colorado focused and have good contacts in the region.”

  34. @Mrs.Smith1
    The emails are steadily bringing to light how this campaign has been run. Everyday, another leak. It’s wonderful imho. We are now aware of what “news” is being spiked and who is doing it.

  35. This one is linked to that Scalia “wet work” email. 4chan thinks they found Scalia hit contract disguised as low budget film pitch in Podesta’s emails (incl. link to map w. line pointing to ranch, script details vacant gov’t seats, US-Mex statehood)
    As I go through some of this stuff, I feel as if I am living in an alternate reality. Who would ever have thought that our own country would betray our citizens like this?

  36. FYI everyone, I don’t think much of what 4chan board states. You are all welcome to decide for yourselves what is relevant. I prefer the wikileak ID emails because those are available with attachments.

  37. mcnorman
    October 15, 2016 at 7:17 pm
    FYI everyone, I don’t think much of what 4chan board states. You are all welcome to decide for yourselves what is relevant. I prefer the wikileak ID emails because those are available with attachments.

    Yeah, that was actually a very lame film script. But keep plowing through nimble navigator. 😉

  38. this is for the Hillary supporters who still lurk here…you know who you are…

    Paris…once the most beautiful and romantic city lies in rumble and rubbish thanks to the Globalists…Globalists who are led by Hillary and Bill…Soros…and their multinationals friends and dictators…all growing rich on the backs of everyday, hard working people…

    (btw…just learned that Cheryl Mills got over $100 MILLION in taxpayer money to give to friends for business endeavors in Haiti and then passed it on to businesses of her own…my god…and the Haitians were left under tarps for years…I hate these people)

    …this is what a Hillary, the Globalist, admin will bring to the USA…just wait…then see how happy you are to have voted in ‘the first female president’…it is not going to be worth it to us in the long run…

    please…think about the long run…please…for the sake of your children…think long term…


  39. lorac
    October 15, 2016 at 1:28 pm


    Lorac, imho…I think Donald has been genuinely hurt by these attacks from random women on his reputation

    he said yesterday that he knew this was going to be viscious but he never thought it would be this viscious…and then he said ‘these are horrible people, they are horrible people

    he will fight on…but i think he has been personally stung by these assaults…

    they are disgusting, corrupt and desperate people…low lives…and hypocrites

  40. S in NJ I have not seen one Hillary sign. Anywhere. A smattering of Trump signs around SJ. Some commercials from Philly Based stations, but they seem more like reminders

  41. It will take longer than a generation. Big Media will never recover nor rehabilitate:

  42. wbboei
    October 15, 2016 at 5:39 pm



    let’s hope those internals are right…

    if i wear red do i have to fear that the criminals will just cancel out my vote electronically

  43. admin
    October 15, 2016 at 7:54 pm
    My guess is whatever surprise it is, it will come out on Monday or Tuesday just right before the final debate.

  44. Donald should build in the next debate…bring all the fine points into focus

    and when he finally closes he should say:

    folks it all boils down to the simple fact…the bottom line

    Hillary and I are on two opposite sides

    I say “America First”

    She says: “New World Order”

    …that is your choice out there when you vote…Do you vote for ‘America First’ or
    the ‘New World Order’…that is what the Globalists are plotting right now with Hillary’s participation…

    then his refrain…

    I ask you to give me a chance…I will fix our problems…

    I will make America safe again

    I will make America prosperous again

    I will make American strong again

    I will make America great again.

  45. I hope I’m wrong and Assange and O’Keefe next drops are too big to be ignored. Seems media ignores everything so far.

  46. admin
    October 15, 2016 at 6:24 pm
    We warned about this at the time before the vote in Iowa but Hillary2008 did not listen. For those that investigated the 2008 election or remember the 2008 election:
    Yes, I remember. Hawkeye was reporting to you and the rest of us who were on the blog at that time about this on the eve of the Iowa primary, bussloads of illegal voters flooding in from Illinois, and, David Yelpsen’s big media’s go to guy in that state (the mini Larry Sabota) was spouting off his usual gibberish, but as you say, the Hillary 08 campaign did not listen to your sound advice. They were too busy getting sold out by PSD, and giving plumb campaign jobs to her donors.

  47. henry
    October 15, 2016 at 9:42 pm
    I hope I’m wrong and Assange and O’Keefe next drops are too big to be ignored. Seems media ignores everything so far.
    Not to worry Henry. Social media is picking that stuff up with a vengeance. And that is where young people, many of whom detest Hillary because he close ties to Wall Street, get their news. I expect it will be so big that lame stream media cannot ignore. And Trump, for his part, will refer to those in his closing statement is the final debate. The theme will probably be this is why she really is, and this is what your world will look like if she is elected. And if there are as devastating as advertised they will cripple her campaign by election time/

  48. mcnorman
    October 15, 2016 at 6:31 pm

    The emails are steadily bringing to light how this campaign has been run. Everyday, another leak. It’s wonderful imho. We are now aware of what “news” is being spiked and who is doing it.


    Agreed, mcnorman- the e-mails are like a welcome shower quenching the thirst of people who have been waiting to hear the Truth, living in a parched desert land called the USofA!

  49. if i wear red do i have to fear that the criminals will just cancel out my vote electronically

    oooh good point….

    I’m very worried about cheating… they may try various types…

    During the campaign I’ve noticed Hillary doing some things that Obama did to her…. so she may have picked up more cheating ideas as well…

  50. https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/4102

    Whatever happened to attorney-client confidentiality?

    9/11 Plaintiff’s attorney is offering briefings to the Clinton team concerning 9/11 Plaintiffs litigation with the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. The attorney feels due to the KSA donations to the Clinton Foundation, perhaps non-public information obtained during discovery could be useful to Clinton.

    “you may find it helpful to receive a briefing on the status of our discovery efforts, our responses to KSA’s motion to dismiss and our best assessment of prospects for the litigation and its final resolution…”

    This is highly unethical and borderline illegal. If Clinton’s team receives pretrial briefings from plaintiffs attorney, you can be assured that Clinton will give a heads up to her friends in Saudi Arabia as to their vulnerabilities in the litigation.


    Dear John and Cheryl:

    I hope this finds you well. And, I hope I have a correct email for John, namely a CAP email; if this is wrong, I will be grateful, Cheryl, if you will forward this to John.

    For the past several years I have been serving as co-counsel to a large number of plaintiffs in the “9/11 cases” (“In re Terrorist Attack on September 11, 2001”) pending in the Southern District of New York. Included among our clients are more than a third of the families of the victims of the World Trade Center attack.

    My involvement in this grew out of a similar assignment I had regarding the resolution of the litigation against Libya arising from the bombing of Pan Am 103 (the so-called “Lockerbie” attack). Over the years since the 9/11 attack and the filing of our litigation, the families and other plaintiffs have had a long history of dealings with the Department of State and the Congress, principally through counsel.

    Much of that interaction has involved the legal question whether the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia should be dismissed from the suit on grounds of sovereign immunity and whether there are ways in which we might expedite resolution of this matter in the interests of justice, a goal we are convinced can be achieved consistent with our national security interests. KSA’s efforts to escape the suit were for a time successful, but, after the Second Circuit acknowledged error in an earlier decision, KSA is back in the case (though actively continuing its efforts to be dismissed).

    In the meantime, robust discovery has taken place, some of which has been the subject of press attention of which you may be aware. Recently, and quite separately, we have been alert to press notice of Saudi donations to the Foundation. This, in turn, has raised the question on our legal team whether you may find it helpful to receive a briefing on the status of our discovery efforts, our responses to KSA’s motion to dismiss and our best assessment of prospects for the litigation and its final resolution. Please let me know if this would be of any interest to you. Either way, please also let me know if you received this note and, if I may impose, share the best emails through which to reach you. Very best personal regards to you both…. Jack

    Jack Quinn ………

    1133 Connecticut Avenue NW 5th Floor Washington DC 20036

    (P) 202-429-6871 (F) 202-457-1130



    The attorney for the 9/11 Plaintiffs, John (Jack) Quinn is a major donor to Hillary Clinton, Democrat politicians and PAC’s.

  51. Jessica Leeds the woman who is accusing Trump of groping her on the plane 36 years ago, was involved in a legal land dispute with Trump in Rancho Palo Verdes in 2008. It was in an LA. times article. She’s also written and was published in the NY Times. Something about her “alpha” male husband who was a horrible driver. Her daughter also met with Joe Biden in 2012. I think I read most of this information on Charles Johnson’s site http://www.gotnews.com there are pictures of the daughter with Biden. I’m not sure where I saw the LA Times article but Trump’s contractors bulldozed Leed’s fence because, from what I can gather, it was over the property line according to surveyors. It was a two year process so she hates Trump.

  52. During the campaign I’ve noticed Hillary doing some things that Obama did to her…. so she may have picked up more cheating ideas as well…

    Mrs. Smith1
    October 15, 2016 at 11:14 pm

    Whatever happened to attorney-client confidentiality?

    9/11 Plaintiff’s attorney is offering briefings to the Clinton team concerning 9/11 Plaintiffs litigation with the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. The attorney feels due to the KSA donations to the Clinton Foundation, perhaps non-public information obtained during discovery could be useful to Clinton.

    “you may find it helpful to receive a briefing on the status of our discovery efforts, our responses to KSA’s motion to dismiss and our best assessment of prospects for the litigation and its final resolution…”

    This is highly unethical and borderline illegal. If Clinton’s team receives pretrial briefings from plaintiffs attorney, you can be assured that Clinton will give a heads up to her friends in Saudi Arabia as to their vulnerabilities in the litigation
    American Bar Association
    Rules of Ethics

    Canon 6. Adverse Influences and Conflicting Interests.

    It is the duty of a lawyer at the time of retainer to disclose to the client all the
    circumstances of his relations to the parties, and any interest in or connection with the
    controversy, which might influence the client in the selection of counsel.

    It is unprofessional to represent conflicting interests, except by express consent of
    all concerned given after a full disclosure of the facts. Within the meaning of this canon,
    a lawyer represents conflicting interests when, in behalf of one client, it is his duty to
    contend for that which duty to another client requires him to oppose.

    The obligation to represent the client with undivided loyalty and not to divulge his
    secrets or confidences forbids also the subsequent acceptance of retainers or employment
    from others in matters adversely affecting any interest of the client with respect to which
    confidence has been reposed.

  53. Re: Jack Quinn. We recall Jack Quinn when he worked at the Clinton White House. He shared an office with someone but we can’t recall who it was right now (the previous person who shared the office died or left, can’t remember exactly but the memory stirs from hearing Quinn’s name again). We’ll check our files (it was someone prominent, top level, but we have a mental block about him at the moment). We called that person who was very high up and Jack answered his phone. That led to several very interesting and very high profile exchanges with Quinn.

    None of the reports in the comments today surprise us. Quinn is that type of “tough” guy.

  54. Sometimes their is honesty to be found on the left as in the very last thing said by Jill Stein in this interview exchange.


  55. Sound and fury:

  56. One of the things that I am most concerned about is how free thought on the Internet is under attack just as all other aspects of freedom have been under attack in my lifetime. People are leaving the lamestream media behind because it is predominately untruthful and propagandized, and they have been finding sanctuary on the internet. Now our intellectual betters are zeroing in on this haven of free thought on the Internet, and I’m feeling that it will be taken away at which point they will have won. People will be silenced because they don’t agree with the global elite, and sites like Hillaryis44 will be no more. Then what? Revolution.

  57. Once again, it’s over for “it’s over for Trump”:


    Donald Trump has lost little support since the first presidential debate, despite days of damaging news stories about his treatment of women, according to a new poll.

    Hillary Clinton leads Trump 47 percent to 43 percent among likely voters in a four-way race, according to the latest ABC News/Washington Post national poll. Libertarian nominee Gary Johnson trails with 5 percent and the Green Party’s Jill Stein is at 2 percent.

    In the previous ABC/Post poll, taken before the Sept. 26 debate, Clinton led Trump 46 percent to 44 percent.

    The margin of error in the poll is 4, so the results are within the margin of error.

    Our sense of the effect of the video and related sex stuff are that nothing changed except for one thing. That one thing is that more Trump supporters decided to lie about their support for Trump in order not to be attacked.

    In other words, Trump did not lose support of voters but the sex stuff made less voters want to get in the firing line so they went “shy”. When people are attacked about their choice of candidate they will simply lie and avoid the trouble in public. But in private, in the voting booth, they do what Hillary says: a public position and a private position.

  58. The New York Times is predicting “it’s over for Trump soon, but not yet, just wait, just wait, just wait, soon it will be over for Trump”:


    The past three weeks could not have gone much worse for Donald J. Trump, or really the entire Republican Party for that matter.

    Yet the polls conducted this week, after the second presidential debate on Sunday, have not been apocalyptic.

    To be clear, the most recent polls are very bad news for him. He trails by a considerable margin — perhaps by around seven percentage points nationwide, based on state and national polls over the last few days.[snip]

    A wave election seemed possible after Mr. Trump was heard bragging about groping women in a videotape, causing many Republican officials to withdraw their endorsements. It seemed it might be imminent after an NBC/WSJ poll showed Hillary Clinton with a double-digit lead soon after the video’s release.

    But there aren’t yet many signs that the bottom has fallen out for either Mr. Trump or the Republican Senate candidates in key states like Florida, Ohio, Wisconsin, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, New Hampshire, Nevada and Missouri.

    Notably, even less popular senators — like Pat Toomey of Pennsylvania and Richard Burr of North Carolina — have held up fairly well in polling this week. On balance, the race looks more or less the way it did a week ago.

    The same thing seems to be true in the House. [snip]

    There are reasons to consider whether things could get worse for the Republicans. For one, Mr. Trump may not have hit bottom — not with a steady stream of women coming forward claiming that he groped or kissed them without consent. And so far in this election, it has generally taken a week or two for big shifts to take hold — whether it was Mrs. Clinton’s post-convention bounce or her post-debate bounce.

    But let’s suppose this is as bad as it gets for Mr. Trump, and let’s say the final polls say the same thing they do now. Even then, it would be hard for the Republicans to feel too comfortable. The number of undecided and minor-party voters is very high.

    These voters have not yet been swayed to support Mrs. Clinton or the Democrats. But they have probably never supported Mr. Trump, they view him very unfavorably, and an overwhelming majority don’t believe he’s qualified to be president. The possibility that they could disproportionately break to Mrs. Clinton — and the Democrats — seems very plausible.

    It’s also very plausible, and even more historically accurate to say that most voters view Hillary Clinton as the incumbent. And if the undecided voters are not with the incumbent they have known so well already then it is very plausible they will disproportionately break for the challenger, Mr. Trump. Donald J. Trump.

    Likewise the Times fails to consider that this cycle’s one or two week lag in polling from big events might mean that the WikiLeaks revelations might not yet have taken hold.

    The obvious never occurs to the Times – not when they can pollute the analysis with stunted observations that lack self awareness of their bias.

  59. NoMoBama, we don’t fear the attacks on us or the internet. It’s always a fight to remain free and unafraid, a continuous struggle.

    As to the attacks from “our intellectual betters” on free thought and the internet, there is this little nugget from Star Wars:

    The more they tighten their grip, the more they lose control.

  60. Admin, your comment about the more they tighten their grip, the more they lose control is similar to what is found in the video that wobbei posted with regards to Trump voters. The more that Donald Trump is attacked, the more resolute are his supporters plus the more support he tends to generate day by day. It seems to backfire on him as people take a day or two or three to decide for themselves if the media is actually being fair to him. They are consistently concluding that the media is not being fair at all.

  61. Uh oh. Donald Trump might have called Marlee Matlin “retarded”. This is another attempt to drag him through the slime. I believe that he may have said this, but I don’t hold it against him. He is a bit rough around the edges. I just wonder if this will allow Donald to bring up the reported slur that Hillary used during an Easter egg hunt event on the lawn of the Governor’s mansion in Arkansas when she referred to the mentally challenged children who took part in the egg hunt as “£ucking retards”?

  62. Peter Thiel to Donate $1.25 Million in Support of Donald Trump 15 OCTOBER

    …Mr. Thiel, who spoke at the Republican National Convention, apparently is unfazed by the storm around the candidate in the last week following the broadcasting of lewd conversations recorded by the syndicated program “Access Hollywood.” The source, who requested anonymity, said the investor feels the country needs fixing, and Mr. Trump can do it…
    Age 49 co-founded paypal…

    Mr. Thiel was identified as gay nine years ago by a blog owned by Gawker Media. He said writers at Gawker should be identified “as terrorists, not as writers or reporters,” and he eventually funded the wrestler Hulk Hogan’s successful lawsuit against the site. Gawker’s flagship website was closed by its new owner, Univision, in August.

  63. You know, I think Trump is really on to something with the drug test for Hillary. I have to wonder if, when she had that “fall”, they did not hit her on the head and put her on mind control drugs. She is like Stepford Globalist Wife.

    The level of corruption and lack of self awareness of these people is amazing. Do they not know what evil is? They do not have a plan for a better society, as the global model is supposed to be. It is simply a plan for global domination and oppression, with unwilling participants.

  64. “The more they tighten their grip, the more they lose control”

    …because even the “average” person knows when they are being controlled…funny, often the people are just not quite as stupid, as pundits and the pols who go to great extents to manipulate them…think

    …pushed to a certain limit, people will react at a primal level…think of that recent octopus who against all odds…still found a way to outsmart it’s captives and set itself free …

  65. Quinn is that type of “tough” guy.
    The problem with power isn’t just that it corrupts.

    The greater problem is it attracts corrupt people.

    I gather that Quinn is a paradigmatic example of both.

  66. How would you like to be John Roberts this morning.

    Its one thing to lose your nerve at the moment of decision.

    To falter in your solemn duty to the nation.

    To throw out Republican government.

    It is another thing to read all about it in Wikileaks

    “Obama threw down the gauntlet, and scared him (meaning you, John) off (from doing his job).”

    That is as much the defining moment in your career

    As much as Comey’s similar cowardice when the nation depended on him to follow the law, rather than succumb to political pressure.

    But John, I forgive you. It is better that the nation perish than that you be scared.

  67. Can you look into someone’s face and determine whether they are made of the right stuff.

    Not always, but more often than you think.

    Roberts has got beta male written all over that mug of his.

    Always willing to hoist the white flag, ever the American flag.

    But that’t okay.

    He’s scarrrrrrred.

    He needs a clean set of diapers.

  68. More sharing and more caring from Podesta emails 9

    EMAILID 12063 List of media personalities who went to the “off the record” private party in the personal home of John Podesta. Includes many corrupt, in the tank-for-Hillary journalists like John Heillman, Mark Halperin, Maggie Haberman (colluding in other emails with the Hillary campaign) and many others. Largest amount of invitees who said yes to the private party are from the NYT, Bloomberg, MSNBC, CNN . Seems to nicely reflect the level of corruption and pro-Hillary bias. This is April 2015 so they were influencing and corrupting journalists for a long time and their investment clearly paid off. https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/12063

    EMAILID 11580 Brent Budowsky writes to podesta 2016 February : “In the last 48 hours a) Hillary and her campaign have begun to question Bernie’s integrity and b) older feminists are beginning a civil war against younger women with idiot comments such as younger women support Bernie to get laid. What would be the reaction if Bill Clinton, George Bush or Harry Reid comments such as this? Or that younger women must support Hillary for the sole reason that she is a woman? Team Clinton has no idea the danger they are causing of creating such an intense antipathy towards Hillary that many Bernie supporters and younger women will not vote for her in November. I had coffee today with a female college senior who is an intern with the Obama administration—the daughter of a Democrat who has worked for senior Democrats who asked me to look after her while she is in Washington, who told me “I just hate her so much I might even vote for a Republican but I will never vote for her.” And she doesn’t even support Bernie.” https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/11580#efmAAGAPF

    EMAILID 11915 Big discussion inside the Hillary campaign whether to take money from people who are registered as “foreign agents” according to the FARA, the Foreign Agents Registration Act. The final decision? taking the money from foreign agents: “Hi all – we do need to make a decision on this ASAP as our friends who happen to be registered with FARA are already donating and raising.” Robby Mook-“I’m ok just taking the money and dealing with any attacks. Are you guys ok with that?” Palmieri “Take the money!!” https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/11915#efmAvrAx1

    EMAILID 11525 Hillary campaign talking about manipulating Reddit and discusses possible ways to exploit Reddit for their benefit : “Our other option is Reddit, which has an extremely vocal core of LGBT members, but I would prioritize this Facebook group, which is the largest LGBT community of Hillary’s supporters I know. These are friendlies, they are already carrying water for us making sure the apology is out there, and they firmly sit in groups 1 and 2 that Dom identified. Whatever we did to send our LGBT talking points to folks has really worked, they are popping up everywhere on the supporter Facebook groups. https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/11525#efmJEMJMC

    EMAILID 12105 Memo revealing they were discussing FBI testimony of Cheryl Mills in meetings: “Please see below for today’s 8am meeting agenda. Also, please note that this meeting should last a full hour” Lists items to talk about “Timing of Focus Groups re Debate Prep” “8/31 Email Release” “Jake/Cheryl Testimony”. https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/12105#efmAC4ADoAHvAIE

    EMAILID 11136 Neera Tanden admits: “I know this email thing isn’t on the level. I’m fully aware of that. But her inability to just do a national interview and communicate genuine feelings of remorse and regret is now, I fear, becoming a character problem (more so than honesty). People hate her arrogant, like her down. It’s a sexist context, but I think it’s the truth.” https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/11136#efmAC0AGw

    EMAILID 11563 #HillarysHealth might be really bad : “Have you talked with her at all about taxes and health? I’m know both are hyper sensitive but I wonder if both are better dealt with very early so we control them” https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/11563

    EMAILID 11500 Podesta is concerned about a murderer’s politically unfortunate name : “NBC News now reporting a US citizen named Sayeed Farouk believed to be one of the people involved in the shooting.” Podesta responds: “Better if a guy named Sayeed Farouk was reporting that a guy named Christopher Hayes was the shooter.” https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/11500

    EMAILID 11152 from someone named fwj to Podesta Re: black vote ” The black is obvious super critical. Im hearing the same complaint in political circles that i continue to hear while fundraising. “The campaign doesnt value black folks and takes us for granted”.” https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/11152

    EMAILID 11897 Democats are campaigning with the prospects of owning the Supreme Court for decades to come. Written by Augie Ribeiro, but John Podesta loves it and finds it great. “Be a Voice to Decide The Future of the Supreme Court The next President of the United States will change the future of the Supreme Court for generations. By the middle of the next President’s term, there will be four Supreme Court justices in their 80s. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg born March 15, 1933. Justice Antonin Scalia born March 11, 1936 Justice Anthony Kennedy born July 23, 1936 Justice Stephen Breyer born August 15, 1938 If Hillary Clinton is elected President in 2016, and is able to replace Ginsberg, Breyer, and either Kennedy or Scalia, she will lock in a very young liberal court for many decades to come. ” https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/11897#efmAGLAQD

    EMAIL 12110 From: Glenn Thrush, Chief Political Correspondent & Senior Staff Writer at POLITICO to John Podesta “I need u It’s an Obama WH story you are in the thing… in a good way but could really use your insights sorry to be a pain in the ass ” https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/12110 The only Obama related article by Glenn Thrush around this time is this one: http://archive.is/gMigP – archived so the evidence can’t get as easily deleted as Crooked Hillary Clinton’s 33 000 emails.

    EMAIL 11446 Someone named Scott Wallace writes to John Podesta, apparently he wants to become US Ambassador to South Africa. : “I know you must have a million things on your plate, but as I mentioned to you, Elizabeth and Smith Bagley were encouraging me to reach out to you sooner rather than later about a possible appointment in an Obama administration… I am passionate about helping South Africa achieve its full promise, and see its upcoming elections and the next couple of years as critical to the health of its democracy. It has become my second country, and I would be deeply honored to be considered to represent President Obama as ambassador there.” He also has a plan B: “Of course, if it is determined that there are other areas where my background may be better put to use, I am happy to discuss them as well. I am deeply interested in the mission of US AID, from my first position in Washington as foreign policy LA to Senator Simpson , to my current foundation work on global development issues. And the agency with which I have the greatest operational familiarity is the Office of Justice Programs at the Justice Department. My full CV is attached.” https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/11446#efmAVuAWxAZAAac

  69. @admin Important leaked emails from 9th batch in spam Everyone please enjoy the leak because it is terribly painful to laugh about it.



  71. Someone in the stands at the Ocala, Fl Trump rally that I attended this past Wednesday took this short video. The crowd was electric. They are trying to say that crowd size at rallies means nothing. Whatever. They will try to steal this election.

  72. John Roberts is so disappointing. I suspect that he was threatened with his life (as Scalia met an abrupt end), or possibly his family was threatened, or perhaps he is gay and they know it and used that to silence him. I am not sure that I would have acted differently under his circumstances, but I would like to believe that I would have. I think that I probably would have stuck to my guns.

  73. nomobama

    October 16, 2016 at 11:48 am


    no wonder the rigged BM doesn’t want to show the size of his crowds…

    I cannot wait for an American ‘Brexit’ election night…let it be…

  74. Hillary, Huma and a staffer.

    There is, reportedly, a photo.

    We shall see if it is produced.

    The source is not Drudge but evidently he is aware of it.

    The other day he had a headline warning Hillary

    That where these sexual attacks are concerned

    People who live in glass houses shouldn’t throw stones

    Personally, I am sick of this stuff

    The effort afoot here is voter nullification

    This bullshit sucks the oxygen out of the room

    It precludes serious discussion of the problems facing the nation

    That should form the basis for the electoral decision

    The big media attack is a direct disabling assault on the people of this country.

    It treats them not as human beings, but as rats to be manipulated.

    Or scaaaared, like poor john roberts.

  75. foxyladi14

    October 16, 2016 at 11:49 am

    oh my!!

    Holy Moly…almost didn’t believe my eyes…let it be so…

  76. btw…I wish someone would ask BM…when they are complaining about DT complaining about the rigged media…why doesn’t one, Rudy, Sessions, someone…someone just turn the question and ask them:

    When Donald asks the media feed camera people to show the size of the crowd and show all the people in the bleaches etc…and the media refuses to move their cameras off Donald and refuse the call of the people at the rally to be seen…

    what is the reason for that?

    Why will the media NOT SHOW THE SIZE OF his crowds??? Why?

    You all did it and swooned over O’s crowds? You recently did it for the size of Bernie’s crowds…

    Why are you all so afraid to show the people, the massive size of the supporters in attendance at all of his rallys…and their unbridled enthusiasm?


    …Because you are all rigged and in collusion with the Hillary camp to simply do everything in your power to demonize and destroy Donald and protect Hillary and keep her corruption while in the cabinet at SOS…a secret and hidden from the people

    BM…people are not stupid…they can still see and hear for themselves…you haven’t fully mastered mass hypnotism in the USA just yet…

    free spirits still live on…

  77. For over a year, the so-called conspiracy theorists have said that Obama will create some major incident that will force him to cancel an election. The current confrontation with Russia may be his October surprise. How would Hillary react to this, I wonder? If he tries anything to subvert this election, he will have to pay some major consequences that only time will tell. He would be foolish to play this game to that extreme, but none of us have ever thought him to be intelligent.

  78. One of the books written by, I believe, a former secret service agent wrote about someone (him?) opening a door in the White House to find Hillary performing a sex act on another female. Hillary was so angry that she threw something at the intruder. Is this believable? I think so, so perhaps a photo will help support this accusation. What’s good for the goose is good for the gander. I’ve read something just a couple of days ago that besides being fearful of the sexual misdeeds of Bill Clinton being presented to the public, that Hillary was concerned that there may be some things presented about her past sexual indiscretions. Again, it would serve her right.

  79. Self-research is what opposition researchers will be able to uncover. This is what Hillary was worried about in 2014. Interesting that taxes appears first in order.


    Self-Research — spoke to HRC. As we discussed, her definition of what she sees remaining with personal lawyers and HFS is the narrow areas we discussed (e.g., taxes, health, finances/speeches, family) though she added BZ. I shared that HFS can continue to manage in partnership with outside personal counsel (including DEK, HT, me) but that self-research as a whole (and explained the larger paradigm) should be in NY and run by someone sitting in NYC,with which she agreed. We discussed HFS; she wants her doing these areas, vetting, and personnel from a perch in the Legal Counsel operation or the COO operation — RM let’s discuss so it is consistent with your vision, organizational paradigm and goals.

    Does BZ refer to Benghazi?

  80. initials to email 11138 are HFS = Heather Sameulson (perhaps lawyer that was present for the FBI & JW FOIA questioning ??)

    DEK = David E Kendall (Clintons longtime lawyer)

  81. Here is three excellent interviews, by one of the few journalists left in the media who is very intelligent (unlike most of those dumshits) and has a keen sense of the right questions to ask. You will like the Rudy interview in the beginning and the Gingrich interview in the end. The chairman of the debate committte featured in the middle is informative. The Luntz interview a waste of time.

    Gingrich says one of the wikileaks shows one of Hillary’s subordinates, and Under Secretary of State, tried to bribe the FBI into covering up the classified emails by promising them additional posts overseas. If that is true, then that individual should be prosecuted. But do you know who else should be held accountable and fired for not taking action on this? James Comey. If this happened, then it would have been reported to him, sure as god made little green apples, in which case, he covered that up as well. And, why wasn’t this illegal act taken into account by him, when he decided to let her off the hook?

  82. Oh oh… if I don’t post for a while, its because I’m in jail. CNN now saying it’s illegal to read the Podesta emails. They say we must learn about them via “the lens of media”.


  83. @admin Yes, I can only imagine how bad spam filter is. No worries, I am more than happy to get the word out that these people are not working for us. Sadly, I supported HRC for many years.

  84. I would also like to give kudos and a thank you to mcnorman for the great job you are doing sifting thru the emails and bringing the info to us…

    …it can’t be easy with the thousands that she tried to hide and are now out there…

    Shame on Hillary…no honor…very sad…

    Lurkers…beware…the dims…and especially Hillary are fully aware the danger and disaster they are bringing to the USA with all these unvetted migrants and refugees but that will not stop them…they are determined to create a Global economy and New World Order…that actually subordinates the USA to Global kingmakers and their policies…

    How can you desert your own country? I will say it again…think of your children and their children…what will be left for them…

    you all once detested Soros…now Hillary is controlled by him…think about what you are supporting…

  85. This is really a form of magical thinking. If they ring the polls to get the results they want to see, then it will become true.

  86. Speaking as a strong supporter of Hillary in 2008 who worked for her in four states, I cannot do so now that I see what she stands for. Did she stand for those same things then as well, but just lied about it? For me, that is an imponderable. What I can ponder today however, and what no one who has the big picture thanks to wikil leaks must realize is that it would take either a traitor to this country, which is exactly what her inner circle is, or a useful idiot which is how she described the base of the party to support her now.

  87. Gingrich interiewed by that moping fool whose voice breaks throughout the interview as she tries to project the sky is falling in on Trump narrative and he tells her you and the rest of big media are the ones who are attempting a coup, wherein 17 executives of big media are attempting to nullify the votes of 14 million Americans.

  88. From an early release Sen. Grassley asks that Lynch look into uranium deal and CGI.

    Attachment PDF

    Mr. Frank Giustra won a uranium deal in Kazakhstan for UrAsia, his company at the time.The deal was cut days after he visited the country with President Bill Clinton and after that deal in 2006, Mr. Giustra donated $31.3 million to the Clinton Foundation.

    On April 23, The New York Times reported on details regarding the Clinton Foundation’s ties to a number of investors involved in a business transaction that resulted in the acquisition of Uranium One, owner of U.S. based uranium assets, by Atomredmetzoloto (ARMZ), a subsidiary of Rosatom, a Russian government owned company. The transaction raised a number of national security concerns because it effectively ceded 20% of U.S. uranium production capacity to the Russian government

    … during critical stages of the acquisition approval, interested parties made large donations – some in the millions of dollars – to the Clinton Foundation while Ms. Hillary Clinton held the position of Secretary of State

    I don’t know why the FBI would not have looked into this? They knew she was lying, too many conflicts. Collaborating to obtain favors in exchange for money donations. Purely coincidental that a person who was able to get a specific contract donated to HRC in 30 million plus range and add in all of the other 10 million plus donations, while calling into question the other unknown amounts of money donated and then lied about to who/what/when/where/why. Wow, just wow.


  89. Oops my blockquote html fail. My thinking:
    I don’t know why the FBI would not have looked into this? They knew she was lying, too many conflicts. Collaborating to obtain favors in exchange for money donations. Purely coincidental that a person who was able to get a specific contract donated to HRC in 30 million plus range and add in all of the other 10 million plus donations, while calling into question the other unknown amounts of money donated and then lied about to who/what/when/where/why. Wow, just wow.


  90. wbboei
    October 15, 2016 at 3:31 pm

    Mrs. Smith1
    October 15, 2016 at 2:43 pm
    Leaked Emails Reveals Clinton Campaign Plotted Supreme Court Threat Over Obamacare
    The globalists have already got their agents on the Supreme Court.

    Oh, that’s just nonsense. Where do you get these wild crazy notions.


    Hoping there is more revealed if forthcoming WikiLeaks concerning the ‘fright’ the elites initiated that stymied Roberts into submission.

    October 15, 2016 at 4:13 pm

    Very interesting dynamic to contemplate as described by Wolin. Seems a distinct possibility in the near future if Trump is not elected the next POTUS

    wbb is there a link to the Wolin narrative?

  91. I find it very interesting how the media is in overdrive today asking Trump supporters if they believe the election is rigged as Donald keeps saying…the media is very defensive as if it has never, ever happened

    And then they follow up with some extremist trump supporter saying something stupid and the media wants to make that the central issue of the Trump campaign

    WHILE IGNORING that the GOP headquarters was fire bombed in NC…and supporters of Trump had their cars spray painted while at one of his rallys

    One thing I am glad to hear is the trump people pushing back hard on tv and all saying the media is rigged…the media is rigging the election against Donald Trump…right to their faces…and the Trump people finish by saying “and everyone knows it”

  92. @Mrs. Smith1
    IDK going through them as fast as I can when I have the moment. Looking in other places as well. Sorry, they are not exactly easy to sift through but you might want to do this…

    in the advanced search use his name and all will come up that are available

  93. @Mrs.Smith1
    They are all interwoven with tentacles and I mean long tentacles. Just found one that probably had the C on it. Didn’t open the attachment but it has the disclosure clause at the bottom. I’m too old and too much of a chicken to open it.


    Bill Clinton
    MF Global (Jon Corzine ring a bell? Here’s a link. It’s WAY too involved to parse it here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MF_Global)
    Laura Graham, the one in the email re: “she was pretty much about to drive her car into the river, but we got in touch with her shrink, etc.
    Doug Band (w/Teneo & frequently mentioned in the leaks)
    Cheryl Mills (in the email chain)
    discusses co-location of Foundation and other entities, who is being paid by whom, concerns about “false” stories in the NYT about WJC & his “women”, etc.

    “For teneo, well before mf global, we have been discussing this. Its going to hurt teneo to have wjc on the adv bd any longer but we need come up with a reorg concept for the relationship with wjc and teneo that is lower key and handled privately and properly that we should discuss…”

  94. Btw
    I noticed all the channels are using this same technique I described above

    All of them…cnn…abc…fox…all on cue with the talking points given from above

    They are so obvious and predictable. ..they are starting to look like fools & stooges

  95. Tweet from Trump campaign 5 minutes ago: wikileaks exposes how obama helped crooked Hillary avoid prosecution.

  96. noticed all the channels are using this same technique I described above

    All of them…cnn…abc…fox…all on cue with the talking points given from above

    They are so obvious and predictable. ..they are starting to look like fools & stooges

    And every time they ask that question, the witness needs to say—-you in big media spent exactly 90 second total covering wikileaks and 27 minutes covering this parade of witnesses whose credibility is suspect, and whose stories do not make sense, and you have got to ask me if the election is rigged? Are you stupid, or do you just think your audience is?

  97. Then you could point out that Soros owns the voting machines, and Project Veritas will be showing how illegals are being used to achieve voter nullification, but no way are the elections rigged.

  98. https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/5702 OLD

    random cringe worthy sampling:

    “Amid chaos in Syria, Hillary Clinton asked for directions to “Washington’s premier gift and accessories retailer””

    “Hillary Clinton: “Having a cracked head is no fun at all” (Then asks for a copy of an email she sent out earlier)”

    “Blumenthal flagged dispatch from his son on Egypt’s liberal party, Clinton calls liberals “politically hopeless”

    “Sid chimes in on Republican rape comments in 2012.”

    FOIA links in it

  99. Trouble…Anon is reporting that Assange might have been poisoned and keys have been dropped in the event of his death. I hope that this is not true.

  100. mcnorman
    October 16, 2016 at 6:52 pm

    @Mrs. Smith1

    You’re doing a great job, mcnorman.
    I’m hoping Anon is just capitalizing on the suspense created by Assange and is looking for a little attention..

    more from me later tomorrow..

  101. People posing as “Anons” are notorious for trolling. Don’t take it seriously until you see something substantial.

  102. mcnorman – if Assauge has plans in place for info to be released if he should die, doesn’t that suggest that the very worst are being held back, and as long as he lives, we will never see them…? (not that I want him dead, it just disheartens me about what he may be releasing before the election….)

  103. mcnorman
    October 16, 2016 at 7:54 pm

    Here’s an explanation from one of the posters JustMyOpinion at http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/10/going-viral-unconfirmed-rumors-assange-dead-wikileaks-posts-deadmans-keys/

    This is an explanation of the new tweets from WikiLeaks via the Donald sub Reddit.

    Known as a SHA checksum(s)

    “To clear up some confusion:

    Wikileaks is tweeting out hashes. They’re not passwords to unlock a
    file, but a digital fingerprint to prove it’s authenticity. This is
    likely prep for future releases. Wikileaks will release files related to
    John Kerry, Ecuador, and the FCO. You can compare the hash of the file
    that you downloaded with the one in the tweet. If it doesn’t match, you
    know that your file is not authentic and was tampered. Hashes are useful
    for any downloads, particularly sensitive ones that Wikileaks

  104. lorac
    October 16, 2016 at 9:38 pm
    I’m sure there is a subclass of fetishes for people who would get aroused by such a video. 😆

  105. http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/10/16/matt-drudge-on-2016-sex-scandals-hillary-clinton-about-to-get-hers/
    That aide handled this poorly.

    If they have a picture, then he cannot deny it.

    So rather than deny it, he seeks to diminish its impact by saying it is trash.

    And it would be, if she hadn’t opened the door with the trash she is peddling about Trump.

    The one thing it will do if it is true, i.e. confirm what Gennifer Flowers said Bill said about Hillary.

    It also suggests why she is so secretive, except when it comes to classified materials.

  106. Contrary to the FOX News bullshit, Trump is rising.

    More important, O’Keefe may be releasing a big story prior to the debate, and possibly as early as tomorrow.

  107. @lorac I am not sure that the worse is being held back. These emails are damning all by themselves. I think that the 33,000 deleted are the ones that are in that pile. I’ve already found two C emails with their attachments. One relates to Benghazi and emails in the 33,000 that are archived. I didn’t open it, I just read the disclosure at the bottom which was enough for me to understand that the Hillary campaign was extremely arrogant in their thinking. This is government work, why on earth was it flowing through gmail unfiltered? I can tell you that there is an army going through these emails. That in itself makes me feel less lonely in this pursuit. One person was collecting specifically for a well known writer. Many are curious like I am. I want to know how deeply entrenched this corruption is. It is very deep. This didn’t occur overnight and will take a lot of sunlight to flush the cockroaches all out.

    @Tony Stark
    Thank you, I had seen that posting. I also read another which stated something to the effect that this information was released so that when the main info came along everyone would know that nothing had been tampered with. Our MSM keeps trying to impress upon us that these emails have been tampered with. Utter nonsense. They are what they are.

  108. Sharyl Attkisson reports on the “relationships” between media and politicians…


    The following is a news media analysis and commentary
    Regardless of who is your chosen – or least favorite – presidential candidate, independent minds should be concerned about the latest revelations in the news media’s unseemly relationships with government and political actors. While there are many responsible journalists working today, inside documents and leaks have exposed serious lapses constituting the most far-reaching scandal our industry has known. It’s our very own Newsgate.

    Compromised reporting has always existed as a result of covert collaborations between reporters and political officials—Democrats and Republicans alike. For example, in my new book out next year, The Smear, I’ll report on instances of improper collusion that surfaced during the Bush administration. The most recent available evidence is heavy on Democrat-ties due to the nature of the available documents and leaks.

    Much, more at link….

  109. Sharyl Attkisson ‏@SharylAttkisson 1h1 hour ago
    36 op-eds across the country incl Politico, Times Union, HuffPost, CNN, Wash. Blade, NJ Bergen Record.”–Correct The Record internal memo

    Sharyl Attkisson ‏@SharylAttkisson 1h1 hour ago
    Hillary super PAC/Smear group Correct The Record has placed 132 op-eds nationally and in strategic local markets…helped write and place

  110. Edward Szall ‏@realEdwardSzall 58m58 minutes ago
    UK Ecuadorian Embassy Security Office confirmed @WikiLeaks founder Julian #Assange is alive & well! .@TRUNEWS Excited for upcoming drops!

  111. this guy, Brian Stelter at CNN, is one of the biggest jerks on TV…who in the world thinks he has the authority to preach to any of us and tell us what he professes to be going on…this guy is a jerk…evidently he worked at the NYT…big surprise

    to begin with he is unwatchable…however the few times I have while monitoring these shows Stelter turns himself into a pretzel to blame everything on Donald Trump…if people damage property of Trump supporters or attack Trump supporters…well, it is all Donald Trump’s fault…

    the man has no honesty or objectivity…

    Stelter is a sick man…with sick thoughts…and the perfect puppet at CNN to do their Trump bashing…


  112. I had read the story of the former Clinton White House employee who left her White House job for whatever reason to work at a Starbucks in Georgetown, only to be murdered there a few months later. Many count her as one of the people on the Clinton “hit list”. Well, I was just reading some comments on the Breitbart website when I came across this comment which filled in much of the details about this young lady who was murdered. Her murder was very suspicious because it seemed like an assassination, and not an attempted robbery as some prefer to believe. Here’s some details that you may not have known:

    willmay waffle_anna
3 hours ago

    Mary Caitran Mahoney was a young “out” lesbian intern in the Clinton Whitehouse. She left all of sudden, telling her friends there, including Lewinsky, that she was being sexually harassed.She took a job managing a Starbucks in Georgetown. A few months later, she was killed at the Starbucks, shot five times. Two other employees were shot only once each (they died too). No money was taken.
    There’s speculation that it was Hillary who was hitting on Ms. Mahoney, and that it just had to be dealt with in a final manner.
    Lewinsky later told a confidant she was worried she would “end up like Mary”.
    Later, an informant, Erick Butera, who came forward with information running counter to the police narrative of the Starbucks murders, was beaten to death when sent by the police into a dangerous crackhouse to do a buy for them.

  113. Mike Cernovich ‏@Cernovich 20m20 minutes ago
    Mike Cernovich Retweeted WikiLeaks
    Hashtag for tonight is #FreeJulian!

    Mike Cernovich added,
    WikiLeaks @wikileaks
    Julian Assange’s internet link has been intentionally severed by a state party. We have activated the appropriate contingency plans.

  114. S, you have to cut him some slack – there were only two choices for the blame, Russia or Trump. They hadn’t heard any Russian spoken around there lately, so he had no choice but to use the Trump option lol

  115. lorac
    October 16, 2016 at 9:38 pm

    regardless of who Hillary is having sex with – man, woman, object d’art, I don’t want to see it. in fact, I don’t want to think about it. it would be like seeing your grandmother, for crying out loud. totally gross.

  116. lorac
    October 16, 2016 at 11:52 pm
    good. he is safe. contingency plans implemented. Le Bon temps roule, baby.

  117. Axelrod this weekend hinted heavily for Obama that Hillary should skip the Fox debate. Now that is an insult and vote of no confidence.

  118. Foreign governments are eating this Wikileaks stuff up. It is confirming what they already know and/or suspected. Obama/Hillary/DNC think they can handle the aftereffect stateside with manipulating the public via media and strong-arm tactics, but the rest of the world not so much. The media has driven the preference cascade almost completely underground. Just like with the old Soviets everyone is lying. How are they going to cheat the vote if they don’t know what the point spread is with at least a minimum of accuracy? As usual the cause and effect were not considered while they were plotting and beating out fires. The coup failed (spectacularly) and the political realignment continues albeit underground. Lucky Trump.

  119. Mormaer
    October 17, 2016 at 7:07 am

    The media has driven the preference cascade almost completely underground.

    Like Brexit, perhaps?

    They never learn.

    These polls are not informative.

    How could they possibly be, in these conditions?

    And the leaves the globalists in a position

    Where they are navigating without a compass.

    Speaking of which, where is Rence hiding these days.

    Why hasn’t he gone after the Republican Party Chairman in Ohio–for treason?

    It is a cardinal sin for someone in his position in a swing state to deny the nominee the support of the state apparatus.

    Whatever else happens, politically etc. he is a marked man.

    Yes, there are others, but his treason could be outcome determinative–although I doubt it will be.

  120. Hillary has gone megalomaniacal with her comments, again to the donor class she works for, that her goal is to take over the entire Pacific Ocean. That comment, is floridly delusional. And with her priorities how is she going to do this? Through gun boat diplomacy? With our depleted military? By toppling governments that stand in our way? Through TPP? By casting a spell on China? She is flat fucking insane. And the only one whose level of delusion and dearth of common sense that approaches hers is the ninny who votes for Hillary, because they are, as she so felicitously put it, manipulable.

  121. Timing is everything.

    Especially in war.

    And this is war.

    Hillary2016 released the Trump tape too early.

    Hillary2016 shut off Assange too late.

    These are huge mistakes.

    Never interrupt an enemy in the middle of a mistake–Bonaparte.

  122. holdthemaccountable
    October 17, 2016 at 9:15 am
    http://hillaryspeeches.com/scheduled-events/ indicates that Jon Favreau will represent her at a West Hollywood fundraiser tomorrow. Her only listed gig is the debate. There are a gaggle of beings filling in for her for rest of month according to this.
    Favreau. Pretty funny.
    Ah yes, behold, comes now the little groper.

    Stone needs to send people to that rally with that infamous picture of the little groper and his side kick with a beer in one hand, and a photo of Hillary which he is groping like an octupus. Yes, that little maggot is a great spokesman for her candidacy.

  123. I think the safest person alive until election day is Assange. If something should happen to him, can you imagine the landslide Donald Trump would win by? Hillary Clinton would be tied to his death because of the Wikileaks daily document dump exposing her corruption. She would be done.

    What many find weird and unjust is Assange’s Internet access is cut off:

    WikiLeaks ✔ @wikileaks
    Julian Assange’s internet link has been intentionally severed by a state party. We have activated the appropriate contingency plans.
    10:33 PM – 16 Oct 2016
    30,401 30,401 Retweets 30,519 30,519 likes
    With that said, Wikileaks has put plans into place for contingency and are awaiting further instructions. If Hillary Clinton or our government things Assange was just sitting in his room doing all this alone, they are sadly mistaken.

    I think it’s an excellent service that Assange provides helping to fortify our concerns about the U.S. Government, but it’s up to you the American voter to go and vote. Only the American people can change things at the ballot box no matter how many emails get dumped or internet access turned off.

    Don’t forget to register to vote and let’s win this thing in November.

    Help support conservative news and views by sharing this post on Facebook and Twitter


  124. Admin: please open the video mcnorman posted.

    Its a game changer.

    And its only the first.

    Martha Raddatz is incredulous that this election is being rigged.

    She is a fucking idiot.

  125. O’Keefe Video –

    Actually, no. I think every one of us knew they were doing this shit. They were doing it with Acorn.

    The problem is that this would shock people who don’t pay attention, but MSM will never, ever broadcast it.

  126. I can tell you right now what Hillary will say about this:

    She will affect that frozen smile, and that cackle we heard when she was asked whether she would be indicted.

    And then she will say, I have my supporters, and sometimes they get a little out of hand.

    Of course, I disavow them.

    But just look at those white supremists who support Trump.

    Which is Jake Tapper que to say, oh really Madam Secretary—tell us about the white supremicists.

  127. blowme0bama
    October 17, 2016 at 12:45 pm
    O’Keefe Video –

    Actually, no. I think every one of us knew they were doing this shit. They were doing it with Acorn.

    The problem is that this would shock people who don’t pay attention, but MSM will never, ever broadcast it.

    Well, I think it is megapolitical.

    And Trump can force the issue at the debate to support his claim Hillary is rigging the election.

    That was why it was released before the debate.

    And when he mentioned it at the debate, that will force big media to deal with it.

    But where it really a killer is on the internet.

    And that is where most of the undecideds are, and they are young people.

    In my view, this is likely to generate a real shit storm.

  128. I think the video is damning. Arrogance with no bounds. Using the mentally ill is beyond pale. Where does the Hillary campaign find these horrible people?

  129. The most amazing thing to me is the ability of O’Keefe to get these bad guys to open up, spill the beans and give us their blue print.

    This can happen in other contexts, such as when the (old) FBI had a Mafia guy between a rock and a hardplace, and offer him a deal to cooperate with the prosecution, on condition that he sing. But you see there is no real art form to that sort of thing. Anyone can get fullblown confession under those circumstances.

    But here the confession of guilt occurs voluntarily. How does he set that one up. I guess part of it is, all these people want to be impactful, so they brag, and brag, and brag. And once you open up, it all rolls out like the Mississippi River. Ultimately, these people get what they really want–15 minutes of fame. However, it may cost them 15 years.

  130. Hillary’s studied response will be:

    How do we know these people are not double agents, really working for Trump.

    I mean why else would they open up this was.

    Tapper, tell us Madama secretary, did Trump do this because he was behind in the polls, or saw the latest WashPo article pronouncing him dead on arrival for this election? In other words, Madam Secreary, why do you think Trump did this. Take all the time you want to explain. I will not interrupt, unless you leave something out of your answer, and then I will help you, by testifying to it myself.

  131. If we had an honest Department of Justice, those provocateurs admitting their crimes in that O’Keefe video would be charged under the RICO act.

  132. Tapper: Madam Secretary, I find your deniability here plausible . . . and I believe any fair person would agree with me. Especially if they have a million dollar salary, a 10 million dollar 401K, and two Porches in the garage, and are a superstar of big media.

  133. So they have got Robbie Mooks tied into this this terror campaign in that email.

    Now there is the nexus to Hillary, since he is her campaign manager.

  134. For the Hillary campaign, this is what the British in their understated, stiff upper lip fashion.

    This is a bit of a sticky wicket.

  135. Tony Stark
    October 17, 2016 at 1:18 pm
    If we had an honest Department of Justice, those provocateurs admitting their crimes in that O’Keefe video would be charged under the RICO act.
    I think this may be actionable under state law, under the police powers of the state. Federal law has not pre empted that–yet. But that is what Holder and Obama—and Eric Schmidt of Google are conspiring to do, which is to say, to federalize everything, and then hand it over to the United Nations.

    Here is the problem if this Administration decided to use RICO. They cannot be trusted. The most important take way from the FBI “investigation”, was after they gave everybody immunity, THEY–THE FBI, DESTROYED THE EVIDENCE AT THE REQUEST OF THE TARGET. Yea, it was Comey. But I have got to tell you, the us attorneys and fbi agents who participated in the investigation, had to have been in on that too, despite the second thoughts they are expressing now. And if that is true, they could very well use the pretext of an investigation to go on another lets destroy the evidence spree, and protect our pensions. The Comey matter has tainted the FBI as an institution. There are no ifs, ands or buts about it. How would you like to be an honest, patriotic FBI agent and have the public believe that you and your institution are corrupt? That would really bother me.

  136. Wikileaks drop 10 is out.

    Neera Tanden and John Podesta. They realize the email deletion will hurt them but they have no idea how much. They think it will quickly pass “I mean, they will go after the deleting of the private emails…but at some point, this just will have to run out of steam, especially as they see minimal electoral consequence. ” Podesta said “They will go after the server but that takes us back to Benghazi which is good for us” https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/12393

  137. mcnorman
    October 17, 2016 at 1:33 pm
    It’s ego driven. They have to tell someone about their accomplishments.
    The question I am asking is why would they trust him enough to open up to him.

    He must have assumed an identity and gotten people to vet for him, for these people to lay out the entire game plan to a stranger.

    It is real, but also surreal.

    The one guy has been to jail before, yet apparently it did not deter him.

  138. Oops hit enter too soon. This Chelsea one sounds problematic. several cases of surveillance and spying was going on between the employees. All of the names of persons will need to be identified and followed up on. There is a lot of information in just this one email: “Ilya physically saw/caught Justin a couple of days ago reading his bberry and loading the same spyware onto his computer that he loaded onto Bari’s computer” “- my father was told today of explicit examples at CGI of Doug/ Teneo pushing for – and receiving – free memberships – and of multiple examples of Teneo ‘hustling’ business at CGI – and of people now having quit at CGI” “- Ilya believes Hannah and Justin have taken significant sums of money from my parents personally – some in expenses – cars, etc. – and others directly”
    Lots of interesting info on this one.

  139. @wbboei
    I think this is guy to guy bragging. I don’t know what disguise O’Keefe was wearing but it seems like he was talking to someone he thought was a novice in the business. Someone he could impress by his boldness. Perhaps he had a few too many and then the loose lips just gave way?

  140. Rather than saying they have done a good job of it

    Lets just say they have been thorough

    Thorough in their efforts to corrupt the the system, and all the major institutions, from the Supreme Court (one of the Podesta emails), the IRS (Lois Learner and the current and two prior commissioners), the justice department (Holder, now Lynch), the RINOS (Paul Ryan), to big media.

    And after corrupting them, they have WEAPONIZED them against the American People, their country and the Constitution, to set the stage for a transition into world government.

    The problem with big media is they have been co-conspirators in the take down of the country. And, now that it is being exposed they are shit out of luck. When you join the mafia, you cannot get out. They simply have to live with the fact that they have corrupted their profession, their brand, and the institutions they work for. And they have received the net present value of 30 pieces of silver, paid to another traitor 2000 years ago.

  141. Alcina, the people on the hidden video are the ones that have been in charge of creating havoc and inciting violence at the Trump rallies. They are a clandestine arm of the Clinton camp. The one head guy coordinates the attacks and is in charge of the messaging between the campaign and the super pacs. This is pretty vile stuff. They train union workers, the homeless, people with mental illness to go in and disrupt the rallies. They start training them two weeks in advance to know what to say and how to act and figure out the best possible way to rile things up.

    What makes it over the top nauseating is that the media then turns around and blames Trump supporters for the violence.

    and very illegal on so many different fronts.

  142. Felix – thanks for the review. It is sickening. but will anything ever come of it? probably not. they get away with murder.

  143. TENEO clients getting special access to CGI, direct corruption.


    Ilya Bill Clintons aid is making calls on behalf of “president Clinton” to members of parliament for Teneo clients!


    Teneo is a consulting firm whom Bill Clinton sits on the board of directors. Here’s it’s background.


    Here they discuss “if this story gets out we are screwed” apparently CVC (Chelsea Clinton) had been digging up dirt. Teneo had been peddling influence using Bill Clintons name.


    Apparently some there is overlap between Teneo, the Clinton Global Inititive, and the Clinton foundation. The three are essentially being used interchangeably. Chelsea is upset that a consulting firm is using the global Inititive as a front.


    Here they are discussing “seperating” Teneo off because of the appearance of corruption.


    13 page document outlining how all the Clinton organizations are related to Teneo


    Laura Graham is going to kill herself Over Chelsea digging into Teneo


    Blackmail (or clarification) material coming from Teneo? Couldn’t see image attachment.


    So it seems we have three worlds here. Bill Clinton, Teneo, the foundation CGI.

    The second world is Hillary. She runs her stuff and campaign and is part of the foundation.

    And the third is Chelsea trying to figure out what is going on. Chelsea has been tasked with figuring out what is going on. WJC is peddling influence. his staff is spying, loading spyware, calling on behalf of Teneo to parliament/congress, and using the foundation to get clients

    In summation bill and Hillary don’t talk enough to even coordinate their scams.


  144. @Tony Stark Good thing that there is a legion of Assange helpers lying in wait to disseminate the emails. They can’t shut everyone down.

  145. Yeah, I don’t use torrent, but the entire WinRAR “insurance” file – 88 gigs, has been released and shared. Need only the decryption key which will be released if he has a gym accident.

  146. EMAILID 12811
    Cheryl Mills sends out an article to Podesta and several others “Aide who accused Bill Clinton of groping her in White House claims ‘Hillary Clinton IS the war on women … she enabled his behavior’ Kathleen Willey claims President Clinton forced himself on her in a study near the Oval Office in 1993, insists that Hillary ‘enabled his behavior’ and then conducted a campaign to discredit her.” Tina Flournoy responds “Saw it last night and ignored it” Doesn’t seem like they were willing to believe the accounts from Bill Clinton’s victims. They simply ignored them.

  147. EMAILID 15261
    More from Mindy (the mole on Elizabeth Warren’s team) and Maggie (an NYT journalist, often colluding with the Clinton campaign). Mindy is giving up inside info as usual, Maggie is colluding as usual. ” The NYT (Jonathan Martin and Maggie Haberman) reached out this morning to tell us that they are aware of a meeting HRC had with Senator Warren at her house back in December. They plan to write imminently, so wanted everyone to be aware that this could pop soon.” Giving advance warning. “Just talked w Mindy. Good convo. She said she’s been getting really good feedback about Dan’s outreach–she said she knows we are talking to the people they suggested and they really like Dan…So good work, Schwerin! Also, she flagged that they’re going to push back hard against POTUS on trade.” handing out info. “And the NYT piece is fine — for both sides.” Of course it is good for you, one of your pawns Maggie Haberman co-wrote it. Phillipe Reines on the same NYT story : “They have to believe it came from us. Reads too perfectly for HRC. If we intended to do it it probably wouldn’t read so perfectly.” Once again a crooked journalist wrote it so it is no big surprise it reads “too perfectly for HRC”. Just remember that Maggie Haberman from the NYT is as Crooked as they come.

  148. EMAILID 13817
    Brent Budowsky again writing to Podesta… It seems Budowsky was an informal adviser of sorts to Podesta (while claiming to be a “journalist”). Budowsky wrote Podesta 70 emails according to the search engine, just in the leaks released so far. This time Budowsky appears to fish for a pat on the back, writing “You’ll enjoy how I handled Trump’s attack against Huma, among other things…Brent” and attaches his latest article, no doubt the fruit of the unhealthy relationship between him and Podesta.
    http://archive.is/3FStJ Budowsky is as clear a case of a Clinton campaign op pretending to be a journalist as there ever was. I provided an archived version of the article because of the Clinton campaign’s known penchant for deleting incriminating evidence. https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/13817

  149. The whole attack on Trump is astroturfed. CNN and NBC have called over 10,000 people who participated in beauty contests over the years, and only 9 condemned him. What we find with those 9 is that most of them are stalkers, since they were mezmerized by him when they met him continue to write him letters seeking his support for their projects and/or have major skeletons in their closets which defy credibility.
    There are way too many coincidences in assaults on Trump

    Melinda McGillivray, 36, told The Associated Press that Trump’s denial in the Oct. 9 presidential debate that he had ever groped women prompted her to come forward after years of brushing off an incident from 2003. She told The Palm Beach Post that while she was backstage at a concert at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort, he grabbed her buttocks. Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump speaks to the Republican Hindu Coalition, Saturday, Oct. 15, 2016, in Edison, N.J. Summer Zervos, a former contestant on “The Apprentice,” says Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump made unwanted sexual contact with her at a Beverly Hills hotel in 2007. Zervos is among several women who have made sexual allegations against the Republican nominee. He has strenuously denied them. Former President Bill Clinton campaigns for his wife, Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, at Washington Park, Friday, Oct. 14, 2016, in Cincinnati. Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton speaks at a rally at the Smith Center for the Performing Arts in Las Vegas, Wednesday, Oct. 12, 2016. Melinda McGillivray, 36, told The Associated Press that Trump’s denial in the Oct. 9 presidential debate that he had ever groped women prompted her to come forward after years of brushing off an incident from 2003. She told The Palm Beach Post that while she was backstage at a concert at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort, he grabbed her buttocks. Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump speaks to the Republican Hindu Coalition, Saturday, Oct. 15, 2016, in Edison, N.J.
    1 of 5
    Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump speaks to the Republican Hindu Coalition, Saturday, Oct. 15, 2016, in Edison, N.J. Evan Vucci AP
    Special to McClatchy
    A few things you’re unlikely to read elsewhere: Donald Trump’s presidential candidacy – and Americans’ ability to choose their next leader – is being destroyed by a sequence of events way too well orchestrated to be coincidental.

    [This election is scaring the hell out of people // Wikileaks shows Univision chairman influence over Clinton campaign // Women’s groups treat Bill Clinton and Donald Trump differently]

    Political columnist Andrew Malcolm
    Political columnist Andrew Malcolm
    This is not about the billionaire’s qualifications or disqualifications to move into the Oval Office, his braggadocio, his awful manners, alleged sexual harassment, crass behavior, ostentatious wealth.

    Americans have had unsavory political leaders before, most recently Hillary Clinton’s charming unfaithful hubby who, among other things, received oral sex from an intern in that same revered office. And then lied about it to authorities.


    This is about Americans being politically manipulated quite cleverly, something people do not appreciate, if they’re allowed to be aware of it. Recent events could be a movie called “Wag the Dog – Again.”

    Let’s consult the autumn timeline: A few days before the first presidential debate last month, The New York Times says it received anonymously some select pages of Trump tax returns from a generation ago.

    They’re extremely tempting for media exploitation because Trump has declined to release tax returns, which isn’t required but has become routine. If you want media to chase anything, tell them they can’t have it. It’s like catnip; they can’t help themselves.

    These tax pages, which the newspaper claims arrived in an unmarked envelope, showed a huge Trump business loss. Yes, it’s illegal to release personal tax information. But recall the IRS selectively crippling conservative non-profits during Obama’s reelection bid in the 2012 cycle by stalling their applications.

    The president professed outrage then to match public outcry. Investigations followed. The once-respected FBI said it was stumped, could not find anything worth prosecuting in a federal agency selectively going after a president’s political opponents in an election year. End of story.

    So, Trump taxes reentered the media news stream.

    Then, two days before the Oct. 9 debate an “Access Hollywood” tape gets leaked with awful audio of Trump boasting crudely about using his wealth and celebrity to successfully grope and kiss women at will.


    This endlessly replayed tape, which relies on the thrice-married Trump’s reputation for crudeness and affairs, caused widespread disgust and gave some Republicans cover to un-endorse the GOP nominee. All of which helps Clinton.

    Now NBC, which employed Clinton’s daughter at a salary far beyond her experience or talents, has possessed this terrible tape since 2005. It was suppressed throughout Trump’s highly successful run hosting 186 episodes of “The Apprentice,” which was on – Oh, look! – NBC.

    The network that was so shocked over Trump’s professed indiscretions has replaced Trump as Apprentice host with another media celebrity and adopted Republican politician, Arnold Schwarzenegger, who announced his gubernatorial candidacy on NBC. Schwarzenegger impregnated the family maid, causing a divorce from Maria Shriver, a prominent member of the Kennedy clan, who once worked for – Oh! – NBC.

    Four days after the video leak, a growing string of women separately, but coincidentally, found the will and strength to break their sometimes decades-long silence to publicly declare they too had been groped and kissed by Trump.

    Trump has vehemently denied these allegations. He’s apologized for his sexual boasts, which he claimed never really occurred. But that put him on defense, which he kept playing. And which the media kept covering.

    All this continued to submerge Clinton’s own scandalous troubles. Using hacked emails from an unidentified source, WikiLeaks released thousands of Clinton campaign emails. They revealed disdain for Catholics, secret links with journalists, collusion with the family foundation and against other Democrats, duplicitous political positions, campaign infighting and devastating evaluations of Clinton’s talents by her own campaign chief.

    Let’s see, which story do you think would draw maximum interest – combing through thousands of pages of stolen documents revealing an unpopular, untrustworthy Democrat proving why she’s unpopular and untrusted. Or obnoxious TV celebrity accused with perfect timing of sliding his hand up women’s skirts, just as he had boasted on tape?

    None of this addresses the truth of these charges. Clinton has often said female victims of sexual predators should be believed by default. Unless it seems they’re accusing her husband. She attacked them.

    What this sordid chapter does address is a pattern of perfectly timed video embarrassments against Clinton opponents. Barack Obama, now her staunch proponent, faced a series of leaked videos of his preacher’s racist, anti-Semitic sermons.

    Read more here: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/opinion/article108682032.html#storylink=cpy

  150. foxyladi14

    October 17, 2016 at 4:35 pm

    melt down


    WOWWW. HRC said, “If that bastard wins, it’s nooses for us all”.

  151. Didn’t Trump say something in the debates about her being out of control? Maybe he was referring to that incident after the Commander-in-Chief forum.

  152. EMAILID12681
    Glenn Thrush , extremely corrupt, dishonest “journalist” writes to John Podesta: “Because I have become a hack I will send u the whole section that pertains to u Please don’t share or tell anyone I did this Tell me if I fucked up anything” then he sends a huge part of the article to John Podesta. Absolutely disgraceful. Podesta approves the section of course which showed him in a very positive light to begin with.
    https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/12681#efmAByAEV Don’t worry Glenn Trush of the Politico.
    I’m sure Podesta won’t tell anyone you did this.

  153. EMAILID 12831
    Foreign press reaches out to the Clinton campaign : “I am writing to you on behalf of the Leading European Newspaper Alliance (LENA), which brings together Die Welt from Germany, El País from Spain, Belgium’s Le Soir, La Reppublica from Italy … an interview with Secretary Clinton. There is plenty for the Secretary to say to the people of Europe. We do not have a set timeframe, and we are perfectly aware of how tight her schedule is. We also know that interviews get arranged by strict policies and guidelines and only if they serve the communication agenda of the Secretary.” https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/12831#efmAS-AVL

  154. NBC hammered Trump’s rigged election spiel and cited some “report” that showed only 31 cases of voter fraud had occurred. LOL!!

  155. Roger Stone claims that Hillary will step down next week, and Obama’s wife will be gifted the position. If true, that would explain Axelrod’s suggestion that she skip the debate. The law does not allow the party to substitute Michelle for Hillary. As previously discussed, there are only two options pertinent to this situaton: the weasel he selected as vp, or the candidate who got the second most votes. The latter is the better view, because the vp never got any votes from delegates. If they do not give it to Bernie, then they will be adding insult to injury where young people are concerned.

  156. wbboei
    October 17, 2016 at 8:46 pm

    The law does not allow the party to substitute Michelle for Hillary.

    Hehh… When has the “law” ever stopped Obama or the Dims?


    IF you can spare a minute, please open Foxy’s youtube below.

    Hillary’s TIRADE is news worthy and should go viral
    if it is seen- you would be doing the country a public
    service by publishing a video that could be informative enough to swing voters to Trump if they finally realize Hillary is certifiable and needs to be institutionalized; NOT the next president of the United States!

    October 17, 2016 at 4:35 pm

    melt down

  158. Here is a wonderful video that pierces the big media veil to the core truths.

    The contention is that the polls are misleading, and one of the ways they mislead is by over sampling democrats, and undersampling blue collar workers. That, on top of the fact, that Trump voters do not self declare. And nobody with any brains participates in their polls. And this being neither art or science, the main thing pollsters strive to achieve is consensus with eachother so that if they are wrong they are all wrong, rather than being the one outlier.

    But the biggest problem is the analysis by big media is skewed to a medium they can control, and that restricts their reach. In this environment, they do not reach the younger people because younger people get their news from the internet and social media. Most of them think big media is a joke. And because there is a social media, the false narratives promulgated by mainstream media can be debunked in the moment or shortly thereafter. Prior to this election, a candidate like Donald Trump would have been destroyed by big media. His strategy of massive rallies, and social media is a new thing. And the consultants who want him to be more like a traditional candidate do not realize or admit if they do realize this, just how much technology has changed the world of politics.

    That is why I am more interested in what social media journalists and pundits are saying, and the growing size of their audience. There is a sense of optimism among those people, and a conviction that Trump will win, which is conspicuous by its absence in big media. That is not to say everyone in big media is corrupt, just because most of them are. Rather, it is to say that they are trying to understand and control with reality with obsolete tools. Here is a perfect example.

  159. @Tony Stark & Mrs. Smith1
    Emails insulting her brothers.
    EMAIL ID: 12730 https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/12730
    Podesta says Hillary’s brothers are crazy

    This is an updated email from the last batch. Hillary must have wanted Sid to be hired on at Center for American Progress. John Podesta said no. Well, in the current batch we have his reply:

    Yup. Maybe we can rent the Queen Mary for the next 18 months and fill it with her brothers and assorted crazy hangers on sail around and around.

  160. Wow.

    That O’Keefe video. Just wow.

    There are more meltdowns on the horizon.

    And to think he started as a kid wearing a pimp outfit. He’s got something here. And the one guy mentions doing this for 20 years.

    I guess the obots were just the latest incarnation, not really something original. Wow.

  161. I guess the obots were just the latest incarnation, not really something original. Wow.
    zoot suiters.

  162. All of this – FOIA info, wikileaks info, I think info is coming from somewhere else too, then there’s O’Keefe, news that FBI personnel are furious –

    I keep starting to feel hope. Then I remember how every time something d*mning came out about O, I thought, this is it, he’s done! But then nothing happened, Teflon O.

    Please, something has to come of all this, this time. All this criminality.

    Oh, and I’m even more convinced now that this is the real Hillary. She basically went right from the campaign to SOS. She didn’t change into this crazed, crooked woman overnight.

  163. Mrs Smith 1 @ 10:31 PM

    I don’t understand how that Youtube link is potentially damaging to Hillary. There is no video or audio of the tantrum after the forum, and an anonymous producer is making the accusations. All she has to do is deny that it ever happened and no one can prove that it did.

    Personally, I believe that the tirade may well have occurred, but I don’t need to be swayed. The “Why aren’t I 50 points ahead?” clip better demonstrates her scary lunatic side just by looking at her eyes.

  164. I watched the video where the claim is made that Hillary will be dropping out next week and will be replaced by Michelle. I indicated at the time that this would not occur. In so stating I relied upon the legal analysis of Jonathan Turley who is a world class constitutional lawyer, which is obvious on the merits, but particularly when he goes up against Jeffry Tubesteak who is the vaunted legal scholar par excelante of CNN. Tubesteak got his ass handed to him, and the only time he took a worse beating was from Glenn Greenwald, when he tried to say that Snowden is a war criminal, and Greenwald, was, therefore an aider and abetter of treason. Big media ignored concerns about Hillary’s health and dismissed them as conspiracy theory for a long long time. But when one of that half wit Plooooooooooof, tweeted that Trump rather than Hillary might have a serious medical problem because he weighs 236 pounds, and is only 6′-3″ tall. Based on that comment big media became obsessed with Trump’s health, not Hillary’s. Now that I have watched the tape, the prediction that Hillary will step down next week appears be more of a tit for tat against Hillary’s campaign for the false claims against Trump which are fed to big media 24-7. In other words, it was more tactical than truthful, unless more emerges.

  165. I wonder how the OPs – the Other PUMAs – are dealing with all these revelations. Particularly the O’Keefe expose – do they recognize any similarities to what obots did to US in 2008? Is it okay NOW because it’s Hillary? I glanced at one site – and it seems none of this stuff is happening.

    Do they not realize that whoever wins the presidency, there will be a man with sexual issues in the White House? I think that side of Trump is disgusting (and now the 2011 episode on Apprentice with Gary Busey, oy), but he’s small fries compared to Bill, and Bill would have lots of free time this time in the White House. So the whole sexual thing is a wash as an issue.

    They think Trump is totally in bed with Russia (but of course no mention of “reset” with Russia, or selling them 20% of our uranium and them paying Bill $450,000 for a 20 minute speech). I’m sure Pay to Play doesn’t exist at all. And Hillary supporters are the salt of the earth, and there is no way it was one of them that firebombed that Trump headquarters (so all the obots – none are voting for Hillary?). And apparently Melania is as terrible as Trump.

    Humans are definitely a very interesting species.

  166. I just saw a trending hashtag for anti-slavery day, and I was thinking how even though Africa started slavery and never stopped, the US is always the bad guy, the focus, for having had it for a couple hundred years.

    It reminded me how people focus on the minority of blacks killed by police, and ignore the vast majority of murders that are black on black.

  167. A supporting fact that has me more chilled than Mooch is due to Donald:

    Obamas’ Next Home: 9 Bedrooms in a Wealthy Washington Neighborhood – The New York Times

    Their lease is for two years. The distance from our White House is two miles. Why they can visit their congressman and President daily, hang out.
    We know nothing’s to low.
    One more reason Trump must win.

  168. Lorac
    Never hear about this

    Brazil was the last country in the Western world to abolish slavery. By the time it was abolished, in 1888, an estimated four million slaves had been imported from Africa to Brazil, 40% of the total number of slaves brought to the Americas

  169. I believe that this is tied to the “Shadow Government”
    EMAILID 12539
    Philippe Reines admits to the following about Hillary Clinton’s emails March 2015 : “To be clear, there are and will likely remain only two parties who can release the full 55k: State and us. Nobody else will have them. Gowdy will only end up with what’s relevant to his committee, which won’t grow that much beyond what he has. Probably not get anywhere close to 500.”

  170. EMAILID 16444
    Hillary “should take a lie detector test.”
    Insiders talking about Bill’s abuse and Hillary’s implication – someone wants her to take a lie detector test. They admit to trying to discredit his victims, and also it seems, Hillary admits to Bill ‘groping’ women in the Oval office.

  171. The Media has a blackout on the emails,lol, some even saying it is illegal to read.
    More attention is given on the blogs and to be truthful, I don’t think the message is getting g out to many people.
    Nothing sells like sex, that is the mentality of the American people…
    I have been in Wisconsin all week ,some Hillary signs in town, some Trump in the burbs…
    I think it will need to be a massive, massive pro Trump turnout to beat the cheating…

  172. The message is getting out there. almost 2.5 million views of O’Keefe’s video in less than 24 hours.

    That is huge. People are using social media to spread the video (and the emails) far and wide.

    For someone (me) that hates social media, I am now in the position of praying that social media will deliver the day.

  173. Cavuto is on FBN now- the only station I can stand these days. He showed an electoral map and says that Hillary could be looking at a landslide. It showed states that should be safe Republican that now are up for grabs or leaning Dem.

    Admin- Can all these polls be wrong. Are we deluding ourselves again? How can she possibly be ahead?

  174. Mike Marks
    October 18, 2016 at 2:19 am

    Mrs Smith 1 @ 10:31 PM

    “I don’t understand how that Youtube link is potentially damaging to Hillary. There is no video or audio of the tantrum after the forum, and an anonymous producer is making the accusations. All she has to do is deny that it ever happened and no one can prove that it did.”

    Would you like to bet the Farm on your opinion?

    “Personally, I believe that the tirade may well have occurred, but I don’t need to be swayed. The “Why aren’t I 50 points ahead?” clip better demonstrates her scary lunatic side just by looking at her eyes.”

    The “Why aren’t I 50 points ahead?” was an avenue for her to vent her true feelings and sounds like a tirade directed at Mooky and her campaign staff. They laughed at her cracking the whip ultimately convincing her to make a satirical video for other insiders to enjoy now that we are aware of their candid statements on the leaked e-mails.

    Hillary has a talent… Coining phrases: i.e. “droning” (Assange), despicable, deplorables.. etc.She would do well to entertain a new career in advertising.. They are always looking for talented new blood where perhaps a catchy ‘jingle’ or “phrases” may become a household word, (i.e. sliced bread, the wheel) for several generations and be of some positive historical importance to her as a Former First Lady. That is, if she genuinely applied herself of course after dismounting her high horse and paying attention to the general needs and wants of Americans. It could be a lucrative tel-commuting career for her allowing her the freedom and the time to be a wonderful loving Grand Mother to her precious, long awaited grandchildren and taking care of her serious health issues.

  175. The name Hillary and the term “new blood” should only be used together in the same sentence when discussing the Countess Bathory. Otherwise, I got a big kick out of the comment.

  176. mcnorman
    October 17, 2016 at 11:22 pm

    @Mrs. Smith1 Not sure what this one means??

    EMAILID 13597 From Sid Bluementhal to undisclosed recipients. “Check the numbers” in response to Blumenthal Deposition Transcript Ready for Release https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/13597


    sorry I didn’t have time to research your question. Drs apt yesterday.. all I could do was read the blog and take notes. My phone isn’t syncd to post..

  177. totally disgusted
    October 18, 2016 at 12:17 pm
    Cavuto is on FBN now- the only station I can stand these days. He showed an electoral map and says that Hillary could be looking at a landslide. It showed states that should be safe Republican that now are up for grabs or leaning Dem.

    Admin- Can all these polls be wrong. Are we deluding ourselves again? How can she possibly be ahead?
    I don’t know what to tell you. Personally I don’t believe that, but with this world who the hell knows. I do recall during the 2012 election several pundits including Dick Morris predicted a landslide for Romney. We all know how that turned out and that’s one of the reasons I no longer pay any attention to Dick Morris. Over the past several months and with the release of the WikiLeaks the corruption is far more than I could have imagined, at least in the United States. I just don’t know anymore 🙁

    However if they get enough people believing it then people simply won’t vote. Stay away from big media at all costs.

  178. totally disgusted

    October 18, 2016 at 12:17 pm

    Cavuto is on FBN now- the only station I can stand these days. He showed an electoral map and says that Hillary could be looking at a landslide. It showed states that should be safe Republican that now are up for grabs or leaning Dem.

    Admin- Can all these polls be wrong. Are we deluding ourselves again? How can she possibly be ahead?

    They’re gaslighting you. The polls are wrong because they’re sampling +6 to +9 Dem. Enthusiasm is on our side. They’re not capturing millions of people who are not “likely voters” – those who haven’t voted recently. They trying to make you believe, as WaPo headlines heralded, that it’s over – to dispirit you.

    I feel I can confidently say, that at least 20% of the Sanders voters will not vote for HRC under any circumstance. That may be excessively conservative. Even the people who will ultimately vote for her don’t like her. She doesn’t inspire any enthusiasm and the only image her name conjures is that of status quo, corruption and privileged.

    She is trailing and they all know it. That’s why they’re so scared of Trump and blasting Riefenstahl level propaganda 24/7.

    Get ahold of yourself.

  179. Felix_the_Infidel
    October 18, 2016 at 12:31 pm

    The name Hillary and the term “new blood” should only be used together in the same sentence when discussing the Countess Bathory. Otherwise, I got a big kick out of the comment.

    I can see your point. 🙂

    After hearing HC label Donna Brazile a “Water Buffalo”.. (almost fell out of my chair LMAO) which just may be a ‘sliced bread’ life changing moment for DB, if it sticks.. She has HC to thank for her comeuppance after selling hillary out in 08′ giving her Florida and Michigan delegates to Obama and the Grand Prize, the 08′ Democratic Nomination!

  180. Well who the fu#k knows at this point.

    Hillary is holed up literally for months except for 3 debates…and it doesn’t matter, it’s pro hillary 24/7 by the media.
    Amazing lack of morals and character in this Country…was it always so? I don’t think so.
    I imagine all these idiots on TV, paper and radio, think they can outrun the chaos, illegal immigrants, Muslim terrorists by padding their collective wallets…they can’t.
    Then there is the 47% that will vote Democratic no matter what…I have those relatives…

    Best not to take a chance of another seizure or the tiny amounts of people who come out to see her.

    I don’t own a gun, my husband has a few. I’m going to get a license and lock and load…just in case…
    I live in Texas, at this point, maybe crazy as it sounds, and I understand it sounds crazy, we and a collective secede if things dovetail…

  181. gonzotx
    October 18, 2016 at 1:33 pm

    Well who the fu#k knows at this point.

    With a 13% MOE, there can be no doubt. It’s all feel good poll numbers targeting HC and her donors. When it’s OP$ they need an element of certainty. Little do they know these cows are headed for the butcher’s block.

  182. Hungary ambassadorship for sale. They wanted $200,000 for the post.
    Email ID15498 More possible evidence of pay to play, possibly implicating Obama.

    Eleni Tsakopoulos donated $200,000 to The Fund for America on 12/28/07, a superPAC set up by John Podesta (a PAC which Soros is also a big time donor). On 1/7/2010 Eleni was appointed as US Ambassador to Hungary by Obama and sworn in by HRC.

    This email from Beth Eagle of the Bonner Group shows that Eleni wanted to ensure Podesta knew that she had made the donation.

  183. imho…if Hillary wins she is going to be a tyrant…fwiw…she is a Scorpio and stories abound about how rude she has been to Secret Service men, military people…people in general…she will be unleashed and loaded…

    “What difference does it make!!!!”

    it sounds like she has an explosive temper and I would bet she has so much pent up anger for things she has gone thru thru the years…

    Bill embarrassing her continually…O and his people ruining her first Presidential run…the repubs and investigations…on and on and on…

    I think she will want PAYBACK with a capital P…and will be ruthless

    We already sees how badly she acted during her time as Secretary of State…how secretive she is…how profoundly dishonest and calculating she is…how she disregards protocol and how she has been protected by the FBI and the Justice Dept to get away with everything…

    What is to stop her when she become President from doing far, far worse and with no one..virtually no one…to answer to…the FBI, the Justice Dept…she has already conquered them

    …nothing seems off limits to her…she will do anything to win and get her way…


  184. mcnorman
    October 17, 2016 at 11:22 pm

    @Mrs. Smith1 Not sure what this one means??

    EMAILID 13597 From Sid Bluementhal to undisclosed recipients. “Check the numbers” in response to Blumenthal Deposition Transcript Ready for Release https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/13597

    I see Blumenthal’s attorney’s edited version of the committee’s questions.. but NOT a viable link to the Committee’s original depo of Blumenthal’s responses.

    If I missed it somewhere, please advise.

  185. I am told that reliable polls show Trump is ahead in the swing states.

    The MSN polls are defective in all the ways we have discussed, with one additional factor which makes them altogether laughable. They exclude in some cases, and minimize in others input from working class voters, who have a keen sense that the globalists fully intend to shoot them in the head, cover them with lye, and do their usual virtue signalling. Their goal is 2 billion not 6 billion on planet earth, a figure which has permeated their writings in times past.

    Here is what is going on. The globalists who own big media and want to control the world are kicking themselves in the foot for not backing off attacking Trump after he won the primary, and simply bide their time, censor news about what is happening in Europe. Instead, their natural hubris got the better of them, and they decided instead to go for the kill and end it now. Brexit caused them to push the panic button. They could not allow that to happen here.

    As a result, the 27 big media chieftans connived a scheme which jumps the shark on legitimate press coverage contemplated and protected by the first amendment. The plan involved fraud on the one hand and obstruction of justice on the other. This is far beyond the back and forth of partisan rankling characteristic of normal elections. This scheme involves a hostile take over of this country, and they were all in on it. All of them.

    If you believe I am wrong, then ask yourself this question: if Hillary is as far ahead as they claim she is with their phony polls, why do you think they are behaving in the shrill manner they are, which is obvious to all concerned? Trust me folks, this is not the sign of confidence. The other thing that is worrying them is the fact that the release this morning, after the shut down which Kerry instigated, proves that Assange will not and cannot be stopped. And he is holding political death warrants on most of them. They know, if they have any sense at all, that it is like the poet Virgil said about death: live (for now you motherfuckers). I am coming.

    The thought of that and the imminent fear that this spells the end of them, must also cause them to question their abiliity to control the narrative, in terms of declining credibility, leadership and polls that are manipulative and highly misleading. But they cannot publicly admit that the circus has moved on, because if they gave even a hint of that, their advertising dollars would dry up. But tht is what they are seeing. For now they are holding conference calls daily, those 27 executives, and the burning question is why isnt tis working. Then, they all pledge loyalty to eachother, as in either we will hang together or hang separately, and who besided us can we scapegoat for this debacle. When they put down the phone, each of them says to himself, if this doesn’t work, its every man for himself.

  186. @Mrs.Smith1
    When you open the email, there is another tab called “view source” you will have to download that in order to go through the entire thing. Anything larger than 10kb must be downloaded. If you are using windows, it will open in Notepad. I believe that some of these emails are also tied to others that have not been leaked yet. Sid is a big monster that you can peruse under the search.

  187. @foxyladi14
    You are most welcome.
    @Mrs. Smith1
    IKD what to tell you except that JP had his finger on everything and everyone. The original depo questions are in there somewhere.

  188. There are so many comments on here I can’t keep up with all of them.

    Not sure if this has been posted yet but O’Keefe was saying on Hannity’s radio show yesterday that this whole endeavor of his was a year long. A completely legal shell company was set up in Belize and they had many operatives that insinuated themselves into his project. He said they had many lawyers giving them legal advice the whole way and everything they did was legal. As far as how they spoke openly to O’Keefe’s people I think it was because his people had been around for a long time (almost a year) and they trusted them. They’re extremely proud of the discord and chaos they cause and they’re crowing about it.

    Wbboei there were people that were physically hurt by their actions. Can these people be sued?

  189. Mike Cernovich ‏@Cernovich 24m24 minutes ago

    Journalists have become part of the ruling class.

    Just as journalist write about public figures, they are:


  190. Wbboei there were people that were physically hurt by their actions. Can these people be sued?
    Yes Yolanda. And it is starting to happen. Today, in Los Angeles Superior Court two assailants both of them Hillary supporters are being arraigned on account of an assault and battery they perpetrated against Trump supporters on Santa Monica Boulevard in Los Angeles last month. The Los Angeles Police department wanted to let them go, but Mike Cernovich was on the scene, he told the officers that he was an officer of the court, had just witnessed a crime, and reminded them that they had a moral and legal obligation to do their fucking jobs. Whereupon the assailents, both of them young women, were given a nice ride the the police station for booking. Not exactly what they had in mind when the went beast mode, but hey, ya do the crime, you pay the fine–and maybe do the time as well. That felony arrest will be pleaded down to a misdemeanor assault will decorate their resume for future employers, and will also be of interest to their current employer most likely. It is a shame for them, but hopefully a deterrent for others who are so inclined. But ignore for a moment the puppets, most of whom frankly are not deterable, and focus instead of the puppteers as depicted in the Project Veritas videos. If those individuals do a nice long stretch in Leavenworth, like, maybe 20 years, then perhaps we could begin to clean up the swamp. But the biggest target needs to be those 27 executives in the media. They need to have a fall from grace, and the public needs to recognize big media for the RICO organization it has morphed into, joined at the hip with the Clintons.

  191. I would expect that Bob Cramer’s wife, who is an Illinois law maker got a few high fives from her colleagues when Bob got charged and slipped the noose. One wonders however whether she will get the same reception when her colleagues see the Project Veritas tape. Take the embarrassment suffered by David Vitter’s wife after he was outed by the dims, multiply it by ten and that would approximate the embarrassment she must be feeling now. Unless, of course, she wants to go out on a limb, and talk about how voter fraud is good for democracy. Give that project to Axelrod, and he could come up with an argument, and say it was verbotten for everybody else, and big media would give him a platform to do exactly that.

  192. Mrs Smith 1 @ 12:23 PM

    “Would you like to bet the Farm on your opinion?”

    Do you mean my opinion that she would deny having a tantrum after the Lauer forum? Seriously? The allegation came from an anonymous producer and there is no video or audio to back it up. What do you think she would do? Confess that it’s all true?

  193. Mike Marks
    October 18, 2016 at 4:15 pm
    Mrs Smith 1 @ 12:23 PM

    “Would you like to bet the Farm on your opinion?”

    Do you mean my opinion that she would deny having a tantrum after the Lauer forum? Seriously? The allegation came from an anonymous producer and there is no video or audio to back it up. What do you think she would do? Confess that it’s all true?

    Devotedly reading here over he past years, I was truly truly delighted when I realized it was not going to be a hard slog for gently convincing this Admin to support a national candidate who represents our American values, Donald J Trump.. What a refreshing surprise. Done and done… thanks admin for being you! 🙂

    And the primary reason I came back to this blog once more.. being the second subscriber here in 07′ and sharing with like minded people our common values.

    Denial and distraction are Hillary’s strength.. Now your playing in her Baileywick. As a know LIAR, do you really thing anyone believes a thing that she says… even her PAID supporters?

    Hillary groomed (herself) from childhood having a father believing attention and Love for a child is based on ‘merit’. Therefore, the Love and attention to his children was based on their accomplishments. It was incumbent on hillary to reap those rewards by meeting every challenge with a WIN, no matter what it takes/took to win…

    That ‘pat on the head’ or hearing ‘good job’ from her Dad ultimately setting herself apart from her competition, her brothers; was an imperative for Hillary. Over the years, she refined hiding her “Dark Side” to a state of the art accomplishment, with the exception of one fatal error, (sharing her intentions with no one- worked in the early years, but is pretty hard to do when you need help from so many people to succeed.) Hiding your covert malevolent intentions is near impossible and in the end, the end result you are still facing failure. (The reason for the Trust and Loyalty oath by the clintons if you ever intend working for them.)

  194. Project Veritas and the O’Keefe video being reported on Fox Business. Deirdre Bolton is being very careful with her choice of words.

    I’m betting Dobbs will report too. I have a feeling he won’t be as careful with the words he chooses.

  195. Drudge has up a slicious story of Hillary and sex…

    Sex sex sex…
    Just what America needs more of…

    I know she started it, sure hope Trump rises above it in the debate…it’s all she’s got.

  196. hi couple interesting links to follow for those of you who are a little skeptical… or curious as to the inside story.
    this kind of stuff could never happen without the net or social media.

    as to polling for those needing hope: https://youtu.be/zCb_lmE1SJ0

    “A thread on 4chan with an FBI insider confirms everyone’s worst suspicions. The Hillary Clinton email server was merely a distraction from the Clinton Foundation and most of DC is in up to their necks in what could be the biggest scandal of all times. This inside info from someone claiming to be a high level FBI analyst whose job was to look at the records, with NOTES added to clarify some of the responses all this and more has been reveled and reported by Before Its News.

    The smoking gun is about to arrive and there are “a lot of people involved”. To save everyone time, here are the choice bits with the link to the entire archive, where you can decide for yourself if this is for real or not. Looks like Trump and Putin hold some of the cards. This could be the most interesting election ever. (Lanugauge Warning):”

  197. EMAILID 16668
    Mae Podesta writing to John Podesta and advising him how to best recommend a person to the CFR the Council of Foreign Relations for a position. The person who needs to have this opportunity according to Mae Podesta is Mea Podesta.

    Mae writes :

    “I am writing to second the nomination of Mae Podesta to join the Council on Foreign Relations as a Term Member. I’ve known Mae since she was a child, having the pleasure to both watch her grow up and navigate her career, as well as seeing her work first hand when she spent a summer at Walmart with my Sustainability team…. The Council will be lucky to have her as a term member.”


  198. EMAILID 16024

    re47 and cbaker agree to put the former Governor of Michigan, Jennifer Granholm on the CTR paylist as an official CTR shill. This seems necessary because they want to start paying out money to her immediately. After a while they will move her to another “vehicle” (slush fund?), to draw salary from somewhere else. CTR is Correct The Record, a super PAC, most known for massive shill campaigns, using paid posters on social media like Reddit and Facebook, funded by millions of dollars.

    I explored with Marc what the limitations would be on HFA’s use of Governor Granholm if she were paid by Correct the Record. As a threshold matter we could not call her a spokesman for the campaign or schedule her directly. We would be able to refer groups or media to her if they are looking for a non-campaign, third part surrogate, the same way we might refer them to the DNC Chair or Stephanie Schriock. For example this weekend she spoke at the Ohio State Party dinner. If she were at Correct the Record we could at least make sure her speaking and media opportunities met our needs/requests. Finally, as a person paid by CTR she could not solicit donations for the campaign. She could be at CTR for a period and move to some other vehicle (New York – or Michigan- state party, DNC, HFA) at any point (i.e. there is no waiting period).


  199. EMAILID 15455

    Email contains attachments with the agenda of a 2007 meeting in NY. Many issues are discussed, like the topic of creating a media “echo chamber” :

    Control the political discourse. So much effort over the past few years has been focused on better coordinating, strengthening, and developing progressive institutions and leaders. Now that this enhanced infrastructure is in place—grassroots organizing; multi-issue advocacy groups; think tanks; youth outreach; faith communities; micro-targeting outfits; the netroots and blogosphere—we need to better utilize these networks to drive the content of politics through a strong “echo chamber” and message delivery system.


  200. EMAILID 15616

    Full list of people considered for VP created by John Podesta, with input from senior staff. Names are organized in “rough food groups” by Podesta which seems to mean organization by the following categories: -Latinos -Women -White guys -African Americans -Military Generals -Business Sector/CEO Bernie is at the very bottom of the list alone in his own category. Seems Podesta thought of Bernie last, even after Melinda Gates, wife of Bill Gates in the CEO list.


  201. vice previous word.

    the above video is great in the beginning

    but it evolves into more of a self help thing which is not relevant to this discussion.

    this is the one to watch.

    adams shows us that Trump is using a weapons grade level of persuasion to take out opponents.

    and he shows us how this is done

    this is the perfect rebuttal for those who say he is crazy

    never dreaming there is a method to his madness

    indeed, a world class persuader


  202. EMAILID 16048

    Lots of fakes in this one…total hypocrisy.

    “Then we went to church. 3 to be exact. We began at the Holy Ghost Cathedral, with about 400 congregants I’d guess. The Bishop gave a rousing introduction about how much she loves Hillary Clinton, because HRC is a woman who’s been through difficult times and come out on the other side with the Glory of God.”


  203. Donald live on OAN in Colorado
    He’s on fire…got his mojo

    Pledges to drain the swamp…has all kinds I of reforms he is pledging


  204. Mrs Smith 1 @ 5:05PM

    Not sure how that relates to the issue of the tantrum; we all know Hillary is a liar. My point, once again, is that the post-Lauer tirade you thought would be damaging to Hillary has no video or audio verification and was alleged by an anonymous producer. That isn’t damaging since she would just say it didn’t happen and there’s no proof that it did.

  205. It is interesting, yes?, how the political class, against whom Trump has laid seige, are circling the wagons and pretending that the polls they are conducting are accurate, despite the polling methodology. The answer we hear back from them is that they do not rely on a single poll, but an average of polls. The problem is all the the polls suffer from the same defects, so when FOX goes to the blackboard and assures us that based on the polls, the electoral path to victory for Trump is closing fast I am underwhelmed. And because we also know that all 27 of the ceos are bent on killing donald, and in an organization like big media the shit flows down hill, the uber narrative becomes more and more implausible, especially when you compare the enthusiasm of the Trump voters with the tepid response of Hillary supporters. What reminded me of this is the latest wisdom from Morris, predicting a Hillary landslide unless Trump mops the floor with her in the third debate. The political class cannot afford to believe, much less admit, that they are an anachronism.

  206. It doesn’t matter if Trump mops the floor in the third debate.

    It was the first he really needed to do it.

    It doesn’t matter because the media has crossed the rubicon.

    If Trump wins, he loses, if Trump wins, he’s a cheating sexaholic…over and over.

    I don’t have faith in the system anymore…

  207. wbboei
    October 18, 2016 at 7:23 pm
    …. What reminded me of this is the latest wisdom from Morris, predicting a Hillary landslide unless Trump mops the floor with her in the third debate. The political class cannot afford to believe, much less admit, that they are an anachronism..
    It was Mr. Morris who predicted a landslide for Romney. And the next day essentially said..”oh well I was wrong”

  208. This thread is getting very long and hard to load. I’ll bet Admin has been cooking up something extra special for tomorrow.

  209. someone has kidnapped Gonzotx…

    the Gonzo we all know here is a fighter…definitely not a quitter

    think of what Donald is going thru…he hasn’t given in or given up…

    free Gonzo to fight another day…

  210. Mike Marks
    October 18, 2016 at 6:23 pm
    Mrs Smith 1 @ 5:05PM

    Not sure how that relates to the issue of the tantrum; we all know Hillary is a liar. My point, once again, is that the post-Lauer tirade you thought would be damaging to Hillary has no video or audio verification and was alleged by an anonymous producer. That isn’t damaging since she would just say it didn’t happen and there’s no proof that it did.

    Until someone comes forward in her employ.. especially if she loses the election. The fact is, the accusations are in quote. What we don’t know if there may have been a like mike behind the stage hen her aides were standing to get the direct quote. So, imo- it’s too soon to call it as “having no proof. There were people there- we know that. Will someone come forward at a later date and speak out? May or may not happen..

    Generally, when a story is published with no mention of names, it’s very seldom I’ve seens quoted paragraphs from an anonymous person who may not what to be targeted by the Clintons. So, I tend to believe what has been quoted is from a recorded transcript by some recording from a live mike somewhere backstage. Too soon to tell.
    I appreciate your cynicism, but hearing about Hillary’s temperament from reliables sources- such as the SS and the many books written about her it isn’t a stretch..

    In reality, all your saying is to you one video is more convincing than the other- it’s just a matter of opinion and a semantic argument at this point until after the election depending on who is the winner..

    I doubt it will be Hillary.

Comments are closed.