Despicable Goes-Around: Hillary Clinton #Hillary2016 Race-baits @RealDonaldTrump #TrumpPence2016

Hillary Clinton is race-baiting Donald Trump. As the premier website in support of Hillary Clinton in 2008 (and 2012) we remember well how Barack Obama and his horde of scum race-baited Hillary Clinton, Bill Clinton, and Hillary Clinton 2008 supporters. Big Media in 2008 joined the Barack Obama scum to race-bait Hillary Clinton 2008. Hillary Clinton 2016 is despicable with race-baiting attacks which smear Donald J. Trump and Donald J. Trump supporters.

If anyone in authority at the Trump campaign ever reads this website they will perhaps be jarred into reciting many of the race-baiting attacks by Barack Obama in 2008 against Hillary Clinton. There were many race-baits from Obama. We remember them all.

In 2008 Barack Obama’s race-baiting against Hillary Clinton worked. The Donald Trump campaign should be careful. Of course, Donald J. Trump is not Hillary Clinton who in 2008 allowed the race-baiting to work. Donald J. Trump hits back hard, eventually.

Donald J. Trump and TrumpPence2016 have not yet hit hard enough. Thus far all we have heard is reminders of Hillary’s “super-predator” remarks about black criminals and Donald Trump’s lone charge of Hillary as a “bigot” This is rather weak as a counter to the Hillary2016 race-baiting. Maybe someday a Trump campaign authority will read good ol’ Big Pink and learn what is to be done to stop the race-baiting.

Donald J. Trump and TrumpPence2016 could remind voters of the 2008 race and how Barack Obama and his scum managed to turn Hillary and Bill Clinton into “racists”. If the Trump campaign wants to alienate the black community against Hillary Clinton it could regurgitate all the ugly race-baits Obama used to smear Hillary. Sauce for the gander.

Donald J. Trump’s wining strategy is to tie Hillary Clinton to Barack Obama. Hillary2016 as the Obama Third Term. But Trump can also sow disunity and remind black Americans of the 2008 fight. Divide and conquer. That fight was ugly. Slime such as Jim Clyburn smeared Hillary and Bill as “racists” and got away with it. The misogyny of Barack Obama in 2008 was ugly. The race-baiting by Barack Obama in 2008 was ugly too.

In 2008 Bill Clinton was smeared by Ted Kennedy when the Chappaquiddick killer remarked that Bill Clinton was a racist because of his honest assessment of flim-flam man Barack Obama. Bill Clinton said Barack Obama’s talents amounted to very little and that logic demonstrated Barack Obama was only fit to bring coffee. It was an honest assessment of the corrupt Chicago slime and a record devoid of accomplishment other than self-advancement, not racist. But anyone who told the truth about Tony “Antoine” Rezko’s pal was denounced as a racist. Anyone who spoke of Jeremiah “G_d Damn America” Wright or the Bill Ayers type terrorist friends of Obama was deemed a “racist”. Now Hillary Clinton adopts the same race-baits to attack Trump and it is extra despicable, from our perspective as Hillary2008 supporters who were smeared as “racists” to watch.

Hillary Clinton, as we have previously warned, should remember that what goes around comes around. The Hillary Clinton race-baiting of Donald J. Trump is the old Barack Obama race-baiting of Hillary Clinton. Race-baiting can go around and hit Hillary Clinton.

In 2008 Barack Obama and his scum race-baited Hillary Clinton. The Democratic Party establishment did nothing to stop the race-baiting. In 2016 we see the Republican establishment doing nothing to stop the race-baiting against Donald J. Trump. To the contrary many in the Republican establishment are doing everything they can to hurt Trump.

On The O’Reilly Factor this past week, obese Frank Luntz argued that Trump denouncing Hillary as a “bigot” was a mistake because it took away from the Hillary email scandal coverage. In other words, Frank Luntz advised Trump to ignore the potent attack of “racist” and not hit back. Wisely, Trump understands that Hillary2016 wants to smear Trump and Trump supporters and Trump is hitting back.

If there is a failing in the Trump attack against “bigot” Hillary it is the lack of 2008 history. Why doesn’t the Trump campaign bring back every “racist” charge Obama made against Hillary Clinton in 2008? Again, what’s sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander. We find race-baiting attacks disgusting but we also understand that the only way to fight the race-baiters is to hit back hard and if necessary dredge up and turn on the race-baiters every bit of race-bait there is. So if Hillary Clinton wants to race-bait Donald J. Trump it is entirely fair for Donald J. Trump to race-bait Hillary Clinton with the words of Obama 2008.

Thus far Donald J. Trump has been too high-minded. Donald J. Trump’s argument is that Hillary and the Dimocrats are bigots because their policies hurt African-American. Trump argues further that all Hillary and the Dimocrats want is black votes and a continued black underclass that continues to vote for those that promise “gimme” policies. Black Americans are disempowered, Trump argues, by Dimocrat policies. Trump appears to make a “bigotry of low expectations” argument and that is the rationale for calling Hillary a “bigot”. That’s not race-baiting however.

Hillary Clinton is race-baiting Donald J. Trump. Proud American (and he is black) Sheriff Clarke makes the Trump argument in an easy to understand tweet which one of our newbie Twitter followers sent us:


The pertinent videos on the race-baiting ugliness are here:

Hillary Clinton’s despicable race-baiting attack against Donald Trump:



Donald J. Trump’s strong defense:



A black American activist responds to Trump’s appeal for black votes:



That last video is a nightmare for Hillary2016 and the political establishment in the Obama Dimocrat Party.

Hillary Clinton’s despicable race-baiting of Donald Trump can only mean that at some point her own despicable associations will have to be examined:

Black Lives Matter is a racist organization created by the lie “hands up, don’t shoot”. Thug Michael Brown did not have his “hands up”. Michael Brown was a thug. Michael Brown’s friend was a thug. Michael Brown’s mother was irresponsible and nowhere to be found as Michael Brown became a thug.

Black thugs like Trayvon Martin and Michael Brown terrorize decent black people. The response from the black community is shameful. The black community turns thugs like Trayvon Martin and Michael Brown into heroes. The black community should celebrate each time a black thug is killed.

We remember when Hillary Clinton was against black thugs and all thugs. But tonight, the DNC, Hillary2016, and Hillary Clinton will celebrate and honor black thugs and their irresponsible black mothers.

Hillary Clinton and Bill Clinton once waged war for decent black people and attacked black thugs and thugs of all colors.

That Hillary Clinton sounds rational. It’s time to stop criminals of all colors from attacks on decent Americans of all colors. In 2016 Hillary Clinton is race-baiting. It’s ugly. It’s despicable.

At some point TrumpPence2016 will have to Drudge up the 2008 campaign. Obama race-baited Hillary. Now Hillary race-baits Trump. It was ugly in 2008 and it is ugly and especially despicable in 2016.

In 2016, unlike 2008, the race-baiters will find that Donald J. Trump is not a wimp who will be taken down by despicable race-baiting. Donald J. Trump knows how to fight. At some point TrumpPence2016 will discover the 2008 campaign and then Hillary Clinton will discover that what goes around, indeed comes around – and not in a good way.

Share

173 thoughts on “Despicable Goes-Around: Hillary Clinton #Hillary2016 Race-baits @RealDonaldTrump #TrumpPence2016

  1. Trump in Iowa speech from today:

    https://www.donaldjtrump.com/press-releases/in-iowa-donald-trump-offers-vision-of-hope-for-the-powerless-and-disenfranc

    Together, we are going to win this state in November – and we are going to win the White House for the American people.

    The White House will become the People’s House. We will tackle and fix the problems that have gone unsolved for years: failing schools, crumbling infrastructure, broken borders, bloated bureaucracy, wasteful spending, and a government that just doesn’t work.

    This is a campaign about big ideas designed to help everyday people. These are the people who work hard but who don’t have a voice.

    It’s also a campaign about restoring honesty and accountability to government service.

    The whole world has been shocked by the continuing revelations regarding Hillary Clinton and her pay-for-play State Department.

    Now it was just announced that her important calendar records will not be released to the public until after the election – more protection from a corrupt government.

    As I’ve said many times in recent days, it’s hard to tell where the Clinton Foundation ends, and where the State Department begins.

    The Clinton Corruption scandals have been a sad time for America. The illegal server, the foreign hacking, the deleted emails, the secret schedules, the lying to Congress. It’s all just too much. How much more can voters take?

    Hillary Clinton thinks she’s entitled to be President – she thinks that she’s above the law. But the truth is the opposite: her criminal conduct at home, and her failed interventions overseas, simply make her unfit to serve in the Oval Office.

    I believe America is ready to turn the page on this sordid past. We don’t want another 4 years of Obama or Clinton Controversies: they’re not only dangerous but, frankly, exhausting to the people. How do you even keep up with them all? [snip]

    My economic agenda can be summed up in three words: jobs, jobs, jobs.

    I don’t even have to mention our tremendous construction workers, every single one of them is going to vote for me – do you have any idea how much I build?

    I am asking for the support of all Americans who want more opportunity, higher wages, safe communities, competent leadership, and honest government.

    We are going to send the special interests packing, and we are going to once again have a government of, by, and for the people.

    Republicans are the Party of Lincoln.

    Which brings me to a subject that is so important and personal for me. Nothing means more to me than working to make our party the home of the African-American vote once again.

    There are millions of African-Americans in this country who have succeeded so greatly and who deserve a government that protects and honors their incredible contribution.

    But we also have to talk about the millions of African-Americans who remain trapped in poverty and failing schools.

    I’ve spoken a lot in recent days about the deplorable conditions in many of our inner cities. As a father, as a builder, as an American, it offends my sense of right and wrong to see anyone living in such conditions.

    Almost 40 percent of African-American children are living in poverty – including 45 percent of children under the age of six.

    In Detroit, half of its residents do not work. In Milwaukee, almost 4 in 10 African-American men between the age of 24-54 are not employed.

    More than 6,000 African-Americans are the victims of murder every year.

    Just yesterday, the cousin of NBA star Dwyane Wade was the victim of a tragic shooting in Chicago. She was the mother of 4, and was killed while pushing her infant child in a stroller.

    It breaks our hearts. This shouldn’t happen in America. We send our thoughts and our prayers to the family, and we also promise to fight for a better tomorrow.

    Across Chicago, more than 2,700 have been shooting victims since January of this year.

    We cannot, as a society, tolerate this level of violence and suffering in our own cities. Those who would deny that this is a national crisis – a crisis requiring urgent action – have no business running for elected office.

    Failed Democratic policies – the policies of Hillary Clinton – have created this high crime and crushing poverty.

    In so many communities under Democratic control, we have bad schools, no jobs, high crime, and no hope. It can’t get any worse. To those suffering, I say: vote for Donald Trump and I will fix it. What do you have to lose?

    Let me also tell you what you have to gain: millions of jobs, better schools and safe communities.

    By the way, how quickly people have forgotten that Hillary Clinton called black youth “super-predators,” and how insulted they were.

    I am running to offer a better future – to the citizens of Detroit, Baltimore, Chicago, and all across this great land.

    African-Americans have given so much to this country. They’ve fought and died in every war since the Revolution. They’ve lifted up the conscience of our nation in the Civil Rights movement. They’ve sacrificed so much for the national good.

    Now is the time to put a new agenda into action that expands opportunity, ensures equality, and that protects the rights of each and every citizen.

    This includes one of the most important rights of all: the right to live in safety. I will work with communities, with police, and with federal law enforcement, to make communities safe and secure for all of our people.

    We are also going to end the discrimination that traps parents and kids in failing government schools. The Republican Party is the Party of School Choice.

    There is another civil rights issue we need to talk about, and that’s the issue of immigration enforcement.

    Every time an African-American citizen, or any citizen, loses their job to an illegal immigrant, the rights of that American citizen have been violated.

    Equal protection under the law must include the consistent application of our immigration laws. [snip]

    On every issue, our campaign is about making life better for working people. But we can’t accomplish that goal unless we break-up the special interest monopoly and give power back to the citizens.

    Many people have said that establishment media assault on me and our campaign – we have a movement – is the greatest in the political history of our country. Even today, some major papers fail to mention how strong our poll numbers have become over the short one-week period – they just refuse to print anything positive or good.

    They too are part of the rigged system trying to deny people the positive change they deserve. They take phrases and statements, chop them up, take them out of context, and discuss them for days. Always trying to demean and belittle me and our incredible movement to take our country back from the death spiral it is currently in.

    Imagine if this much media attention was spent telling the truth about the real problems facing America. Imagine if the media spent this much time telling the story of Sarah Root.

    All of the ugly things being said by Hillary Clinton and our opponents in recent days – funded by big banks and Wall Street donors – are nothing more than a desperate attempt by failed leaders to cling to power in order to keep rigging the system.

    There is nothing they won’t say or do, no lie they won’t tell – and no amount of money they won’t spend – to try to bully voters into giving them what they want.

    This November 8th, the American people are going to reject the cynicism of the past and embrace the optimism of the future.

    The old attacks aren’t going to work anymore. The Clinton-Kaine fear-mongering isn’t going to resonate with anyone but the most radical factions of their far-left base.

    I want to empower people. Hillary Clinton wants to scare people.

    Empowering people begins with three simple words: jobs, jobs, jobs.

  2. Bannon is probably busy right now dredging up all the accusations of racism leveled by Obama against Hillary in 2008 and recycling them for use in future speeches and advertisements against Hillary16.

  3. Trump must expose Hillary’s dark side

    Thomas Jefferson stated “whenever a man has cast a longing eye on offices, rottenness begins in his conduct.” Nathaniel Hawthorne declared corrupt politicians’ “hearts wither away … Their consciences [turn] into India-rubber or to some substance as black as that.” They could have been speaking of Clinton.

    Americans have discovered that virtually everything Clinton said about her private server and emails was untrue. Some 15,000 new emails have suddenly appeared, beyond the 33,000 “personal” emails her aides and lawyers claim to have destroyed. FBI Director Comey said she should not be indicted.

    However, the FBI is requiring the House of Representatives to store Clinton’s redacted emails and investigative documents in a secure location. Congressmen must have Top Secret clearances to read them. This situation has an Orwellian, Alice-in-Wonderland quality. (Or as they say: Cuckoo-cuckoo!)

    more @:

    http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/presidential-campaign/293381-trump-must-expose-hillarys-dark-side

  4. Glenn Greenwald does an admirable job navigating the twisted logic used by her campaign to excuse Hillary’s deleted (personal e-mails)

    Why Did the Saudi Regime and Other Gulf Tyrannies Donate Millions to the Clinton Foundation?

    That the Clinton Foundation has done some good work is beyond dispute. But that fact has exactly nothing to do with the profound ethical problems and corruption threats raised by the way its funds have been raised. Hillary Clinton was America’s chief diplomat, and tyrannical regimes such as the Saudis and Qataris jointly donated tens of millions of dollars to an organization run by her family and operated in its name, one whose works has been a prominent feature of her public persona. That extremely valuable opportunity to curry favor with the Clintons, and to secure access to them, continues as she runs for president.

    The claim that this is all just about trying to help people in need should not even pass a laugh test, let alone rational scrutiny. To see how true that is, just look at who some of the biggest donors are. Although it did not give while she was secretary of state, the Saudi regime by itself has donated between $10 million and $25 million to the Clinton Foundation, with donations coming as late as 2014, as she prepared her presidential run. A group called “Friends of Saudi Arabia,” co-founded “by a Saudi Prince,” gave an additional amount between $1 million and $5 million. The Clinton Foundation says that between $1 million and $5 million was also donated by “the State of Qatar,” the United Arab Emirates, and the government of Brunei. “The State of Kuwait” has donated between $5 million and $10 million.

    Theoretically, one could say that these regimes — among the most repressive and regressive in the world — are donating because they deeply believe in the charitable work of the Clinton Foundation and want to help those in need. Is there a single person on the planet who actually believes this? Is Clinton loyalty really so strong that people are going to argue with a straight face that the reason the Saudi, Qatari, Kuwaiti and Emirates regimes donated large amounts of money to the Clinton Foundation is because those regimes simply want to help the foundation achieve its magnanimous goals?

    Here’s one of the Clinton Foundation’s principal objectives; decide for yourself if its tyrannical donors are acting with the motive of advancing that charitable goal:

    good read:

    https://theintercept.com/2016/08/25/why-did-the-saudi-regime-and-other-gulf-tyrannies-donate-millions-to-the-clinton-foundation/

  5. Tony Stark
    August 27, 2016 at 9:09 pm

    Bannon is probably busy right now dredging up all the accusations of racism leveled by Obama against Hillary in 2008 and recycling them for use in future speeches and advertisements against Hillary16.
    ——–
    Let us at least be sure that he sees what Admin has written today.

  6. Tony

    It seems like someone from his camp does
    Otherwise it is uncanny how WE are all on the same wavelength

    what’s that expression about like minds…

  7. Mrs. Smith1
    August 27, 2016 at 10:20 pm
    There isn’t much room to interpret what the CGI and CF were doing in relation to the Saud’s and other foreign governments and the US government. It is called “lobbying”. Whether in or out of office it is influence peddling. It is illegal, immoral, sometimes seditious. The recent “insiders” description by a PBS flunkie who hired on as a master of ceremonies describing the foreign attendees of the CGI “conferences” as scumbags and the trained seal behavior of the acolytes whipped into orgasm to “give, give, give!” (to cover administrative costs) at fancy venues is typical of time-share poobahs and tent revival fake preachers. They will take your money so you can feel better about yourself.

    This kickback, bribes, pay for access is very typical of the Mideast, Africa, Tammany Hall, New Orleans in the old days, and various other notorious crooked places throughout the world. It is illegal as hell here but it seems a good gig if you have the unmitigated gall to pull it off and no shame. “Green tech” and global warming nuts do this same thing in having “conferences” and getting bribes to take to Dept of Interior and EPA types too in the Obama administration until they were exposed and had to go underground and deal with the courts.

    I am surprised at the crudity of the operation. It seems so Jim and Tammy Faye. Hillary’s posse of “helpers” seem like morons from their pathetic little emails also. Bleachbit? Did they buy it off the website of Newegg?

  8. A lot of uncanny stuff has definitely happened in this campaign regardless of who checks what.

    But that being said, I know of at least 4 or 5 major pro-Trump hubs on the internet that I would credit with helping keep this campaign chugging along, this site being one of them. Places like twitter and facebook are merely dumping grounds for things thought up and revealed in the further reaches of the internet.

  9. It is reassuring to know that that speaker of truth to power journalism otherwise known as NBC, has gone out of its way to help its audience understand that the “trailer trash” who accused the president who signed NAFTA and emptied out our manufacturing sector of foul deeds, have been “thoroughly discredited”, while neglecting to mention that one of those cases was settled for $750,000 because by the terms of the settlement that was not an admission. Good old NBC. They never miss an opportunity to miss an opportunity to take off their advocate hat and practice what they pretend to practice namely journalism. It is nothing short of fraud.

  10. Tony Stark
    August 28, 2016 at 10:39 am
    ———————–
    That speech was made to Chinese women who could not vote for her even if she had been running for office in 1995 when she made it. So I don’t think that it should be diminished. It was a much needed and well done speech.

    Hillary has sold out to Blofeld no doubt and I was horrified by her silence on the rape epidemic in Europe and her wanting to bring those misogynists here. At this point all her supporters must just hope she is lying her ass off and will not actually throw them under the bus. It is all crazy.

  11. Foxy,

    Wondering if that is a set up. Simultaneously on MSNBC and NBC… no Fox….

    Trump needs to be careful. He’s not a wonk like her, some of the worst people I know had the greatest verbal skills by the way…
    There is audience participation which frankly looks like a set up to me.

  12. I agree it was a good speech, but you have to admit that she knew that voters back home in New York would hear and read about it and that it would help her in the Senate elections back then. Her actions since then with regards to the Clinton Foundation accepting money from governments repressive towards women, though, speak to me louder than her words made back then.

  13. Mormaer
    August 28, 2016 at 6:49 am

    “I am surprised at the crudity of the operation. It seems so Jim and Tammy Faye. Hillary’s posse of “helpers” seem like morons from their pathetic little emails also.”

    After reading (below) the ‘hi-brow’s ‘pay to play defense coming from Mitch McConnell.. I laughed so hard almost fell off my chair thinking is this what we are paying for? This old relic’s profound enlightenment?

    Where the last vestiges of an opposition party has been removed from our legislative branch of government. They have become ONE forever and ever known as the ‘Unity Party’..

    “The elusive nature of quid pro quo proof — now the primary Democratic defense of Clinton — has also long been the principal argument wielded by the most effective enemy of campaign finance reform, GOP Sen. Mitch McConnell. This is how USA Today, in 1999, described the arguments of McConnell and his GOP allies when objecting to accusations from campaign finance reform advocates that large financial donations are corrupting:

    Senate opponents of limiting money in politics injected a bitter personal note into the debate as reformers began an uphill quest to change a system they say has corrupted American government. …

    Sen. Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., the legislation’s chief opponent, challenged reform advocate Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., to name Senate colleagues who have been corrupted by high-dollar political contributions.

    ”How can there be corruption if no one is corrupt?” McConnell asked, zeroing in on McCain’s frequent speeches about the issue in his presidential campaign. ”That’s like saying the gang is corrupt but none of the gangsters are.”

    Hillary is perfecting the art of quid-pro-quo seeing that many (the entire Congress) stands to benefit from her providing cover of her sequestered e-mails. She will most likely skate IF and UNLESS Wikileaks does not provide our last chance at seeing and hearing the Truth of the information contained in those e-mails..

    The Executive branch for the most part (in the wrong hands will become a dictatorship), The SCOTUS is wobbling. All that is left for complete control of Americans, is a Unified Congress representing their own interests 100% of the time. And we are DONE. Take down the flag and institute The NEW and IMPROVED Constitution 2.0 ready to be put in place, contrived by Cass Sunstein.(and BO)

  14. Tony Stark
    August 28, 2016 at 12:55 pm

    Agreed, Tony. Hillary is not lying to the public. She is
    a Globalist who has deserted her countryman and her country.

  15. Women’s rights are human rights . . .

    UNLESS their names happen to be Lewinsky, Jones, Willey, Broderick etc. or any other woman who gets in the way of you know who.

    In that case, what they can look forward to is a bite on the lip, and private investigators turning their lives upside down at Hillary’s direction, e.g. Jack Palidino.

    Yes, a powerful statement alright.

    But there does come a point where the exceptions swallow the rule. No pun intended.

  16. gonzotx
    August 28, 2016 at 12:49 pm

    gonzo, if you’re talking about “operation taco bowl” yes, it sounds a bit fishy to me, too. DJT, please be careful..

  17. German Economy Minister: “TTIP Talks Have Failed”

    In the latest blow for Obama’s global trade agenda, German Vice Chancellor and Economy Minister Sigmar Gabriel said that free trade talks between the European Union and the United States have failed, citing a lack of progress on any of the major sections of the long-running negotiations. “In my opinion the negotiations with the United States have de facto failed, even though nobody is really admitting it” ZDF quoted the minister, according to a written transcript of the interview to be aired on Sunday. “[They] have failed because we Europeans did not want to subject ourselves to American demands.”

    http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-08-28/german-economy-minister-ttip-talks-have-failed

  18. Tony Stark
    August 28, 2016 at 12:55 pm
    ————
    Are you saying Hillary was planning a senate run in 1995 and that is why she went to China and made that speech?

  19. Lu,
    In retrospect now that I’m more cynical about the Clintons, it’s not inconceivable that she and Bill were already thinking about her possible future in politics if he did not win a second term in 1996 and were laying the groundwork for her to run for senator of New York. It doesn’t make her speech any less good, but now they just sound empty, especially when she associates herself with Islamists and takes money from governments like Saudi Arabia.

  20. gonzotx

    August 28, 2016 at 12:49 pm

    Foxy,

    Wondering if that is a set up. Simultaneously on MSNBC and NBC… no Fox….
    ________________________________________________________

    Of COURSE it is. HRC never does ANYTHING that isn’t carefully scripted, choreographed and filled with screened participants.

  21. foxy, you posted that “Trump train” video on the last thread, I responded in a comment to you back there, just fyi!

  22. Asymetric warfare? Or, perhaps, consistency is the hobgoblin of small minds. From another site:
    ————————-

    Trump: “I want to secure the border and follow immigration laws.”

    Clinton response: Trump is a racist, sexist, homophobe, Islamaphobe, bigot, fascist.

    Trump: “I want to make good trade deals to bring jobs back to America.”

    Clinton response: Trump is a racist, sexist, homophobe, Islamaphobe, bigot, fascist.

    Trump: ” I want to make black people secure and prosperous.

    Clinton response: Trump is a racist, sexist, homophobe, Islamaphobe, bigot, fascist.”

    Trump: “I want to defeat ISIS and create safe zones in the Middle East.”

    Clinton response: Trump is a racist, sexist, homophobe, Islamaphobe, bigot, fascist.

    Trump: “I will work with Putin in areas of common interest.

    Clinton response: : “This orange maniac will blow up the world.”

    Trump: “I want to make America Great Again.”

    Clinton response: Trump is a racist, sexist, homophobe, Islamaphobe, bigot, fascist.

    etc.

  23. Dr. Paul Craig Roberts was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Economic Policy and associate editor of the Wall Street Journal. He was columnist for Business Week, Scripps Howard News Service, and Creators Syndicate. He has had many university appointments. His internet columns have attracted a worldwide following. Roberts’ latest books are The Failure of Laissez Faire Capitalism and Economic Dissolution of the West, How America Was Lost, and The Neoconservative Threat to World Order

    Trump vs. Hillary: A Summation — Paul Craig Roberts
    August 25, 2016

    Trump vs. Hillary: A Summation

    The US presidential election this November will tell whether a majority of the US population is irredeemably stupid. If voters elect Hillary, we will know that Americans are stupid beyond redemption.

    We don’t know much about Trump, and anti-Trump propaganda rules in the place of facts.

    But we know many facts about Hillary. We know about her violation of classification laws and the refusal of the Democratic administration to do anything about it. The Democrats prefer to control the White House than to enforce the law, another nail in the coffin in which the rule of law in the US lies.

    We know from their words and deeds and material success that the Clintons are agents for Wall Street, the Big Banks, the military/security complex, Israel, agribusiness, and the extractive industries. Their large personal fortune, approximately $120 million, and the $1,600 million in their foundation, much of which came from abroad in exchange for political favors, attests to the unchallengable fact that the Clintons are agents for the oligarchy that rules America, indeed, that rules the American Empire from Australia and Japan, through North America and Western and Eastern Europe to the Russian border.

    We know that Hillary, like Bill, is a liar.

    We know that Hillary is a warmonger.

    We know that Hillary made the most irresponsible statement ever uttered by a presidential candidate when she declared the President of Russia to be the “new Hitler,” thereby raising tensions between the nuclear powers to a higher level than existed during the Cold War.

    We know that Hillary is allied with the neoconservatives and that her belief in the neocons’ ideology of US world hegemony is likely to result in war with Russia and China.

    All we know about Trump is that the oligarchs, who sent America’s jobs overseas, who flooded the country with difficult-to-assimilate immigrants, who destroyed public education, who bailed out Wall Street and the “banks too big to fail,” who sacrificed American homeowners and retirees living on a fixed income, who intend to privatize both Social Security and Medicare, who have given the public killer cops, relentless violations of privacy, the largest prison poplulation in the world, and destroyed the US Constitution in order to increase executive power over the American people, are violently opposed to Trump. This opposition should tell us that Trump is the person we want in the Oval Office.

    Some claim that it is all a charade and that Trump is playing a role in order to elect Hillary. American politics are so corrupt that anything is possible. However the ruling elites and their puppets seem to be genuinely concerned about Trump’s challenge to their control, and they have united against Trump. They have used their money to buy up “progressive” websites paid to bring the print and TV anti-Trump propaganda onto the Internet, thus joining the Internet presstitutes with the print, TV, and NPR whores who are working overtime to demonize Trump and to elect Hillary.

    The entire power structure of our country is behind Hillary. Both Democratic and Republican political establishments and both ideologies, neoliberals and neoconservatives, are united behind Hillary.

    How much more evidence do Americans need in order to know that a vote for Hillary is a vote for their own emasculation?

    Apparently, Americans remain captives of their insouciance. According to news reports, a majority of voters still haven’t a clue about the consequences of voting for Hillary. Polls report that Hillary is well in the lead. Are these real polls or just another presstitute lie to discourage Trump supporters? Why vote when they have already lost?

    The propaganda assault against Trump, vicious as it was, did not succeed during the Republican primary. Despite the media condemnation of Trump, he swept the other Republican candidates aside effortlessly.

    The current media demonization of Trump might fail as well. Indeed, it is so transparent that it could elect him.

    All that is required is for enough Americans to awake from their insouciance to recognize that it is the enemies of their own lives, their own living standards, and their own liberty who are violently opposed to Trump.

    If Americans cannot reach this realization, they have no future, and neither does the planet Earth.

    The ruling oligarchy hates Trump because he disavows war with Russia, questions the purpose of NATO, opposes the offshoring of Americans’ jobs, and opposes the uncontrolled immigration that is transforming the United States into a multi-cultural entity devoid of unity. The oligarchs are replacing the United States with a Tower of Babel. Oligarchic power grows exponentially among the disunity of diversity.

    In other words, Trump is for America and for Americans.

    This is why the oligarchs and their whores hate Trump.

    The imbecillic Americans who vote for Hillary are voting for war and their own immiseration.

    Possibly, a vote for Trump is the same. However, in the case of Trump we do not know that. In the case of Hillary we most certainly do know it.

    Of course, it could matter not how Americans vote. Those who program the electronic voting machines will determine the vote, and as the establishments of both political parties totally oppose Trump, the programmed machines can elect Hillary. We know this from our electoral history. The US has already experienced elections in which exit polls show a winning candidate different from the candidate selected by the electronic machines that have no paper trail and no way of affirming the vote.

    If Hillary gets into the Oval Office, nuclear war is likely before her first term is over. A vote for Hillary is a vote for nuclear war.

    If you look at the forthcoming election realistically, you have no alternative but to conclude that the entirety of the presstitute media and American Establishment prefers the risk of nuclear war to the risk of losing control of the government to the voters.

    That Americans permitted the rise of unaccountable power tells us all we need to know about the dereliction of duty of which United States citizens are guilty. The American people failed democracy, which requires accountable government. The American government has proven that it is not accountable to the US Constitution, to US statutory law, to international law, or to voters.

    If the result of Americans’ dereliction of duty is nuclear war, the American people will be responsible for the death of planet Earth. One would hope that with responsibility this great on their shoulders, the American people will reject the unequivocal war candidate and take their chances on holding Trump accountable to his words.

    Dr. Paul Craig Roberts was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Economic Policy and associate editor of the Wall Street Journal. He was columnist for Business Week, Scripps Howard News Service, and Creators Syndicate. He has had many university appointments. His internet columns have attracted a worldwide following. Roberts’ latest books are The Failure of Laissez Faire Capitalism and Economic Dissolution of the West, How America Was Lost, and The Neoconservative Threat to World Order.

  24. A sober assessment of what NYT called “the greatest civil rights victory since 1964”, signed by our (sigh) first black president. Yet loons still buy that rag, and read it, to make sure they remain ignorant and ill informed.
    ———

    Most Americans are too brainwashed to understand that Obamacare is not “socialized medicine.” Obamacare is privatized medicine. Obama permitted the private insurance companies to write Obamacare. What Obamacare does is to divert federal subsidies into the pockets of private insurance companies. The deductibles and co-pays are so high that those who qualify for the subsidized premiums cannot afford to use the policies.

    Republicans intend to privatize Medicare and Social Security. The road to Medicare privatization is the small percentage of medical billings that Medicare pays. Medical care providers are beginning to find that it is unprofitable to provide care to Medicare patients. When doctors cease to provide care under Medicare, the massive payroll tax revenues will be diverted into the hands of “more efficient” private providers.

    The road to Social Security privatization is the “reform” of the consumer price index, which under-measures inflation in order to deny Social Security recipients cost-of-living-adjustments. The continuing decline in the real value of Social Security benefits will result in large-scale economic distress. This distress will be used to discredit the Social Security system and to privatize it.

    Whenever you hear “privatization,” you are hearing the formation of a scam that will create riches for insiders while taking the public to the cleaners.

    http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2016/08/23/hats-off-to-mother-jones-paul-craig-roberts/

  25. He’s hitting up Hillary too lol – hitting on her intelligence

    Donald J. Trump ‏@realDonaldTrump 5m5 minutes ago
    Crooked Hillary’s brainpower is highly overrated.Probably why her decision making is so bad or, as stated by Bernie S, she has BAD JUDGEMENT

    Donald J. Trump ‏@realDonaldTrump 12m12 minutes ago
    Does anyone know that Crooked Hillary, who tried so hard, was unable to pass the Bar Exams in Washington D.C. She was forced to go elsewhere
    283 retweets 635 likes

  26. Donald’s just trying to get a rise out of them, just like Kirk got a rise out of Spock in the Star Trek movie reboot, thereby forcing Spock to resign his command of the Enterprise.🤓

  27. Roger Simon makes a very serious point:

    Will the Clinton Foundation Mark the Fall of Our Republic?
    BY ROGER L SIMON AUGUST 28, 2016 CHAT 650 COMMENTS

    No matter how extreme the future revelations of Julian Assange and others turn out to be, the truth about the Clinton Foundation is already clear. Whatever its original intentions, this supposed charity became a medium to leverage Hillary Clinton’s position as secretary of State for personal enrichment and global control by the Clintons and their allies. We also now know—as the Wall Street Journal’s Kimberley Strassel made clear in her recent oped—why Hillary decided to hide all her emails on her “infamous server.”

    To my knowledge, nothing like this has ever been done in the history of the United States government. It calls to mind, if anything, the United Nations’ scandalous Oil-for-Food program in which millions were siphoned off from a plan to feed Iraq’s children during the war.

    It could even be worse, because of the national security implications. The Clinton Foundation and the State Department were commingled to such an extent we may never know the truth, certainly not before the election since that same State Department has refused to release Hillary’s official schedule before then.

    Clinton Corruption and Us
    This means, quite simply, that the United States of America has abandoned the rule of law. Maybe we did a while ago. In any case, we are now a banana republic—a rich and powerful one, at least temporarily, but still a banana republic.

    The election of Hillary Clinton—our own Evita—will make the situation yet more grave. Consider something so basic as how you raise your children in a country where the president is most probably an indictable criminal and most certainly a serial liar of almost inexhaustible proportions. What do you tell them? What do their teachers tell them? A far cry from George Washington, isn’t it? What does this say about our basic morality and how does that affect all aspects of our culture? The fish, as they say, rots from the top.

    Equally importantly, what does our government do as further actionable information emerges as it inevitably will? The Department of Justice, as we have seen, is already corrupt, unable to indict those in power, indeed colluding with them aboard airplanes. The same personnel will undoubtedly be in place. Can we rely on congressional oversight for justice and/or a potential impeachment? What if the Democrats control the Senate?

    In the far less serious Watergate era, Republicans like Howard Baker stood up against Nixon. Democrats, however, cling to power the way they accuse Republicans of clinging to their guns and religion and will no doubt avert their eyes, pretending, with their friends in the media, that nothing out of the norm is happening. But plenty is and will. Look to Sweden for the future of America. And with expanded entitlements and immigration, Syrian and otherwise, don’t look for a Republican revival in 2020. Those days will be long over.

    “A republic, if you can keep it,” Benjamin Franklin reportedly said when emerging from the Constitutional Convention of 1787. Yes, it may be apocryphal, but so are many important statements that are true in concept.

    2016 is about to mark the year we lost that republic. It could well be an historical date like 1066, 1215 and 1776. Think about that one.

    Which leads us to Donald Trump (as usual).

    He is, like it or not, the last man standing to prevent this. He and all of us. And that includes you, NeverTrumpers. There is nothing, repeat NOTHING, that Trump has ever done that comes remotely within the proverbial spitting distance (even from a dragon) of the malfeasances of the Clinton Foundation. The big difference between Trump and Clinton is this: What distresses us about Donald is what he says. What distresses us about Hillary is what she does. Anyone with an IQ in the also proverbial triple digits knows which is worse.

    It’s time for the NeverTrumpers to abandon what’s left of their crusade for the sake of the country.

    https://pjmedia.com/diaryofamadvoter/2016/08/28/will-the-clinton-foundation-mark-the-fall-of-our-republic/?singlepage=true

  28. https://pjmedia.com/trending/2016/08/29/illegal-immigrant-crashes-bus-full-of-louisiana-flood-volunteers-kills-two/
    —–
    And Hillary wants to increase legal immigration from Syria which is a hotbed of terrorism that our own FBI/CIA concedes we cannot vet by 550% not because it is good for the country, on the contrary it is deadly for the country, but because she is being paid to advance the Soros agenda to take down this country and lay the groundwork for world government. But that is better by far than voting for real change, and a man with orange hair who says the darnest things. He, not Hillary is the problem. Besides, all that really matters is having a woman president. This is how a nation commits suicide, and feels good about it.

  29. Trump shouldn’t be referring to Hillary’s “brainpower.” He should be referring to her “mental capacity.” See how words matter?

  30. http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/08/26/black-men-for-bernie-founder-end-democrat-political-slavery-of-minorities/

    ‘Black Men for Bernie’ Founder to End Democrat ‘Political Slavery’ of Minorities

    Black Men for Bernie founder Bruce Carter’s mission to restore black communities didn’t end when Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders lost to Hillary Clinton in the Democratic primary. He opposed Hillary Clinton and the Democratic establishment then because he knew that they didn’t represent the minority communities he engaged in politics to fight for.

    After the leak of internal DNC emails, Carter is convinced that the Democratic Party “rigged” the primary against his candidate and that Hillary Clinton’s Democratic Party has no intention of changing the policies that led to the destruction of the communities he’s working to improve.

    Bruce Carter still believes that Hillary Clinton is the poster child for the kind of cronyism, corruption, and evil that the Bernie revolution was built to overthrow. He doesn’t believe Hillary Clinton when she labels Donald Trump and his supporters as racists because he knows she falsely labeled her opponents in the primary as sexist “Bernie Bros.” Carter’s preparing to take the experience, knowledge, and contacts his group built during the primary to campaign against Hillary Clinton and for Donald Trump and other Republicans in battleground states across the country.

    Bruce Carter and Black Men for Bernie are at war with the Democratic establishment, whom he says pander for votes but haven’t delivered meaningful results to minority communities for decades. Carter became politically active to support Bernie Sanders, who taught him how the establishment’s only real constituency was the donor class. When he paired that knowledge with what he knew about the decline in the black and minority neighborhoods he loves, he realized Democratic politicians and the media had been lying.

    “Bernie inspired us to disrupt the status quo because it only works for the elites and not regular people who are struggling,” Carter told Breitbart News. “If black communities vote for Hillary Clinton and Democrats in November, nothing will change because Democrats will continue to believe they don’t have to do anything to earn our votes.”

    Carter became one of the most prominent and recognizable supporters of the Sanders campaign by traveling the country in a tour bus and fleet of vehicles wrapped with the Black Men for Bernie logo and a picture of Sanders being arrested during the civil rights movement. His online videos received millions of views and featured celebrities like Mark Ruffalo and ice cream makers Ben and Jerry.

    At the Democratic convention in Philadelphia, Black Men for Bernie organized daily protests with crowds in the thousands. The message of the Bernie protesters outside of the DNC convention was that the movement would continue and that Hillary Clinton was still the epitome of the cronyism and corruption that the Bernie people had built a movement to defeat.

    Carter told Breitbart News that his greatest awakening of how Democrats exploit minority voters came when he learned from the Washington Post that the Democratic Party spends less than 2 percent of its campaign resources with minority-owned companies, even though they get better than 90 percent of the black vote. It is a practice that Carter calls “political slavery.”

    When Carter emailed Breitbart News this link as the source for his claim that Democrats don’t invest campaign resources with minority businesses, he singled out interim DNC Chairman Donna Brazile, saying, “Donna Brazile is mentioned in the article, and it would be nice if you could mention that because later I will call her out on a lot of things.”

    Now Black Men for Bernie are rebranding and again planning to tour the country with an emphasis on battleground states. Carter says he’s going to organize black and minority communities to vote against Hillary Clinton and the Democratic establishment.

    “Donald Trump is a business man and a real estate mogul who could provide knowledge and resources to transform urban communities through the development of minority-owned businesses,” Carter said. “With this tour, we’re going to show Mr. Trump and Republicans that the black and minority communities are ready to work with anyone willing to work with us to build opportunities in businesses, employment, and housing. We don’t want welfare, we need opportunity.”

  31. http://www.theecps.com/

    BOSTON, MA – Three new Emerson College polls show a tight race shaping up between Democrat Hillary Clinton and Republican Donald Trump in the key Rust Belt States of Ohio, Michigan and Pennsylvania. The two are deadlocked at 43% in Ohio. Clinton leads by three points in Pennsylvania (46% to 43%) and by five in Michigan (45% to 40%). The Libertarian Party’s Gary Johnson garners 7% of the vote in Pennsylvania and Michigan and 10% in Ohio. Green Party candidate Jill Stein receives 2% of the vote in Ohio and Pennsylvania and 3% in Michigan. Each poll consisted of 800 likely voters and had a margin of error of 3.4 percentage points.

  32. Phony Reuters poll backpedaling on the narrative:

    https://ca.news.yahoo.com/clinton-leads-trump-5-points-reuters-ipsos-poll-062657638.html

    U.S. Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton leads her Republican rival Donald Trump by 5 percentage points among likely voters, down from a peak this month of 12 points, according to the Reuters/Ipsos daily tracking poll released on Friday.

    The Aug. 22-25 opinion poll found that 41 percent of likely voters supported Clinton ahead of the Nov. 8 presidential election, while 36 percent supported Trump. Some 23 percent would not pick either candidate and answered “refused,” “other” or “wouldn’t vote.” [snip]

    In a separate Reuters/Ipsos poll that includes candidates from small, alternative parties, Clinton leads the field by a smaller margin. Some 39 percent of likely voters supported Clinton in the four-way poll, compared with 36 percent for Trump, 7 percent for Libertarian candidate Gary Johnson and 3 percent for Green Party nominee Jill Stein.

    The phony polls tighten considerably as we enter the real campaign period – post Labor Day.

  33. >b>The U.S. Department of Clinton

    The latest emails show that State and the foundation were one seamless entity.

    By Kimberley A. Strassel
    Aug. 25, 2016
    1456 COMMENTS

    This is the week that the steady drip, drip, drip of details about Hillary Clinton’s server turned into a waterfall. This is the week that we finally learned why Mrs. Clinton used a private communications setup, and what it hid. This is the week, in short, that we found out that the infamous server was designed to hide that Mrs. Clinton for three years served as the U.S. Secretary of the Clinton Foundation.

    In March this column argued that while Mrs. Clinton’s mishandling of classified information was important, it missed the bigger point. The Democratic nominee obviously didn’t set up her server with the express purpose of exposing national secrets—that was incidental. She set up the server to keep secret the details of the Clintons’ private life—a life built around an elaborate and sweeping money-raising and self-promoting entity known as the Clinton Foundation.

    Had Secretary Clinton kept the foundation at arm’s length while in office—as obvious ethical standards would have dictated—there would never have been any need for a private server, or even private email. The vast majority of her electronic communications would have related to her job at the State Department, with maybe that occasional yoga schedule. And those Freedom of Information Act officers would have had little difficulty—when later going through a state.gov email—screening out the clearly “personal” before making her records public. This is how it works for everybody else.

    Mrs. Clinton’s problem—as we now know from this week’s release of emails from Huma Abedin’s private Clinton-server account—was that there was no divide between public and private. Mrs. Clinton’s State Department and her family foundation were one seamless entity—employing the same people, comparing schedules, mixing foundation donors with State supplicants. This is why she maintained a secret server, and why she deleted 15,000 emails that should have been turned over to the government.

    Most of the focus on this week’s Abedin emails has centered on the disturbing examples of Clinton Foundation executive Doug Band negotiating State favors for foundation donors. But equally instructive in the 725 pages released by Judicial Watch is the frequency and banality of most of the email interaction. Mr. Band asks if Hillary’s doing this conference, or having that meeting, and when she’s going to Brazil. Ms. Abedin responds that she’s working on it, or will get this or that answer. These aren’t the emails of mere casual acquaintances; they don’t even bother with salutations or signoffs. These are the emails of two people engaged in the same purpose—serving the State-Clinton Foundation nexus.

    The other undernoted but important revelation is that the media has been looking in the wrong place. The focus is on Mrs. Clinton’s missing emails, and no doubt those 15,000 FBI-recovered texts contain nuggets. Then again, Mrs. Clinton was a busy woman, and most of the details of her daily State/foundation life would have been handled by trusted aides. This is why they, too, had private email. Top marks to Judicial Watch for pursuing Ms. Abedin’s file from the start. A new urgency needs to go into seeing similar emails of former Clinton Chief of Staff Cheryl Mills.

    Mostly, we learned this week that Mrs. Clinton’s foundation issue goes far beyond the “appearance” of a conflict of interest. This is straight-up pay to play. When Mr. Band sends an email demanding a Hillary meeting with the crown prince of Bahrain and notes that he’s a “good friend of ours,” what Mr. Band means is that the crown prince had contributed millions to a Clinton Global Initiative scholarship program, and therefore has bought face time. It doesn’t get more clear-cut, folks.

    That’s highlighted by the Associated Press’s extraordinary finding this week that of the 154 outside people Mrs. Clinton met with in the first years of her tenure, more than half were Clinton Foundation donors. Clinton apologists, like Vox’s Matthew Yglesias, are claiming that statistic is overblown, because the 154 doesn’t include thousands of meetings held with foreign diplomats and U.S. officials.

    Nice try. As the nation’s top diplomat, Mrs. Clinton was obliged to meet with diplomats and officials—not with others. Only a blessed few outsiders scored meetings with the harried secretary of state and, surprise, most of the blessed were Clinton Foundation donors.

    Mrs. Clinton’s only whisper of grace is that it remains (as it always does in potential cases of corruption) hard to connect the dots. There are “quids” (foundation donations) and “quos” (Bahrain arms deals) all over the place, but no precise evidence of “pros.” Count on the Clinton menagerie to dwell in that sliver of a refuge.

    But does it even matter? What we discovered this week is that one of the nation’s top officials created a private server that housed proof that she continued a secret, ongoing entwinement with her family foundation—despite ethics agreements—and that she destroyed public records. If that alone doesn’t disqualify her for the presidency, it’s hard to know what would.

    http://www.wsj.com/articles/the-u-s-department-of-clinton-1472167746

  34. Trump’s response to Huma’s separation from Weiner:

    http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/08/29/trump-on-huma-abedin-anthony-weiner-just-another-example-of-hillary-clintons-bad-judgment/

    “Huma is making a very wise decision. I know Anthony Weiner well, and she will be far better off without him. I only worry for the country in that Hillary Clinton was careless and negligent in allowing Weiner to have such close proximity to highly classified information,” Trump stated in a press release on Monday afternoon. “Who knows what he learned and who he told? It’s just another example of Hillary Clinton’s bad judgment. It is possible that our country and its security have been greatly compromised by this.”

  35. Lets talk about the oldsters.
    They are being quiet. No yard signs.or bumper stickers.
    But they will vote Trump!!’It is called the silent vote.
    And it will be Yuuge!!!. 😀

  36. Trump needs to be careful on his immigration policy.
    Even Rush thinks he’s not going to deport, outside of criminals.

  37. Huma ..Honestly, how she stayed with him was beyond belief.
    I guess one could make a case that he put himself out there to be blackmailed and here Huma was the right hand of Hillary, SOS..

  38. gonzotx
    August 29, 2016 at 3:50 pm
    Trump needs to be careful on his immigration policy.
    Even Rush thinks he’s not going to deport, outside of criminals.
    ————
    The objective is not to deport the non criminal illegal aliens.

    The objective is to make it onerous for employers to hire them,

    And to deny them public benefits.

    Then, they will self deport in droves.

    Then, they can apply for citizenship from the outside

    And go to the back of the line behind those who apply legally

  39. Apologies if anyone has mentioned this. What if the Huma/Weiner split is just to drum up sympathy for her? After all, grieving woman, husband is a cheat, a louse, and can’t keep it zipped. Official excuses for her will be, She’s in pain and cannot deal with any more pressure, “Leave Huma alone.”

    On another note, a little OT but not much since Admin mentioned her this afternoon: Seeing as how race-baiting is the topic this week, I wonder where Donna Brazile’s chips will fall when Wiki-leaks unloads its next batch. She was hardly unscathed from the last batch but everyone went after Sgt. I-Know-Nothing-Schultz.

    She (Brazile, the blue-haired wonder) was the one that lectured us on the rulez and how there “will be blood” if the messiah (little m on purpose) did not get the nomination. She is a race baiter extraordinaire and has been causing waves here in NC this year by using litigation to prevent the voter ID laws now in effect as of this year.

    I ask because little-miss-can’t-be-wrong did the circuit tour of the morning programs Sunday morning and I smelled shades of Susan Rice. Essentially: Deny, derail, deflect, and, if necessary, destroy.

    I think something’s up with that one and I don’t mean Karl Rove.

  40. Huma ..Honestly, how she stayed with him was beyond belief.
    I guess one could make a case that he put himself out there to be blackmailed and here Huma was the right hand of Hillary, SOS.
    —–

    Another bride, another June
    Another sunny honeymoon
    Another season, another reason
    For makin’ whoopee

    A lot of shoes, a lot of rice
    The Weiner’s is nervous, he answers twice
    Its really killin’
    That he’s so willin’ to make whoopee

    Now picture a little love nest
    Down where the roses cling
    Picture the same sweet love nest
    Think what a year can bring

    She works for Hillary
    Most every night
    He doesn’t phone, he doesn’t write
    He says he’s busy
    But she says, “is he?”
    He’s makin’ whoopee

  41. wbboei
    August 29, 2016 at 5:55 pm
    —————————
    Exactly.

    The solutions to our problems are not rocket science. It just takes someone competent and willing to solve them instead of exploit them. Building the wall and kicking out the criminals is obvious.

    The deportation squads are bad news and decent person wants to use then for anyone but criminals. Then, it costs too much money. They say 10 million, but the truer number could be 5X that.

    Self-deportation would be the preference, using economic motivators.

    I have to wonder if the concerns some voters have over Trumps plans pertain to the illegal behavior of people who hire illegals. Yup, lot’s of fines and penalties, there, too.

  42. Blofeld continues his plans for global domination.

    Leaked Soros Document Calls For Regulating Internet To Favor ‘Open Society’ Supporters

    Very soon, on October 1, 2016, much of the internet’s governance will shift from the US National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) authority to a nonprofit multi-stakeholder entity, the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, also known by its acronym ICANN. As The Gatestone Institute’s Judith Bergmann explains,

    http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-08-29/leaked-soros-document-calls-regulating-internet-favor-open-society-supporters

  43. Well all I know is Eisenhower didn’t have an issue with marching 5 million illegals to the border…too bad he didn’t build a wall after that…
    We were a different nation then, a different world…

    Self deportation, actual a Romney term from 2012, will take a very long time. One has to wonder, if Trump can pull this out, if he will be around to finish enough of the job.
    The Globalist are out in the open and don’t care anymore what we minons think, just don’t get in the way, as Dr Drew and journalist Seaman (sp) just found out.

  44. Tony, thanks for posting that. I might have to watch it again in its entirety now lol It was amazing how young they all looked – even Cloris Leachman!

    You may know, Gene was married to Gilda Radner. He was heartbroken during her illness and death. I always heard that she was the most genuine and caring people you’d meet. So I always figured there must be something special about Gene, as well, that they fit together so well.

    And whenever I catch the Raymond show on TV, I always remember the monster, because Ray’s Dad in the series was the actor who played the monster (Peter Boyle).

  45. Well, of course, long before I “met” Gilda in 1975 with Sat Night Live, I knew Gene from Willie Wonka in 1971….

    I just ran across something in wiki:

    While in character as Roseannadanna, Radner gave the commencement address to the graduating class at the Columbia School of Journalism in 1979. lol that was Gilda!

    Those two were comedic geniuses, and I think very good people. RIP.

  46. I just caught a glimpse of the Five on FOX, and as usual I was underwhelmed with the level of analysis. For starters, that Dana Perino talks alot but always says nawthing. Juan is his usual stupid self, proving once and for all that you cannot cure stupid. But the largest faux pau was their failure to make a convincing case that there was a pay to play operation going on. They agreed that foreign governments paid money to the Clinton foundation and that got them access to Hillary while she was SOS, and access is immoral but not illegal. They decided that there was no proof that the money also resulted in influence, meaning a change in US policy as the quid pro quo. There is, of course, the Ericcson deal which was not mentioned, but the better example of malfeasance and outright bribery was the UBC case where the IRS sought access to the 52,000 Americans who had deposits in Switzerland and the Bank refused. Whereupon the Justice Department went to court and obtained a court order compelling the release of this information. Whereupon UBC refused. Whereupon the government made preparation to bar UBC from transacting business within the US. On the eve of the issuance of that order UBC increased its contribution to the Clinton foundation ten fold (from $60,000, to $600,000) and paid Bill over a million dollars for speeches. Whereupon Hillary intervened on their behalf and got the government to back off on that action, in exchange for a settlement which kept 48,000 of those 52,000 still shrouded in secrecy and bragged that she made them disclose for a meager 4000. Incidentally, that is Soros’s bank, he has major deposits there which she was keen to protect, his top lieutenant Robert Wolf was the architect of the Obama campaign and carries messages to Obama from Soros at their usual meeting place which is Martha’s vineyard. So for those who claim this was only access, but no proof of influence, the smoking gun is right there.

  47. Lu – I am so hot under the collar about the internet turnover. Obama just does not want us to be a sovereign nation. He needs to go.

  48. My sense is this: if Hillary had not stopped the investigation and the order in exchange for a sleeves off the vest gesture by the bank then it could have ultimately led to a situation similar to this one, which brought down Clark Clifford and Robert Altman:
    ———-
    In 1991, Clifford’s memoirs Counsel to the President (co-authored with Richard Holbrooke, later U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations) were published just as his name was implicated in the unfolding Bank of Credit and Commerce International (BCCI) scandal. The scandal focused on the criminal conduct of the international bank and its control of financial institutions nationwide. The bank was found by regulators in the U.S. and the United Kingdom to be involved in money laundering, bribery, support of terrorism, arms trafficking, the sale of nuclear technologies, the commission and facilitation of tax evasion, smuggling, illegal immigration, and the illicit purchases of banks and real estate. The bank was found to have at least $13 billion in unaccounted funds.[citation

  49. lorac
    August 29, 2016 at 9:59 pm
    Lu – I am so hot under the collar about the internet turnover. Obama just does not want us to be a sovereign nation. He needs to go.
    ——–
    Listen to the second half of the Morris podcast I posted above. There are ways to stop this.

  50. Colin Kaepernick Gets His Islam On

    By Larry Johnson – Monday, 29 August 2016 118

    The saga of spoiled man-child Colin Kaepernick gets more interesting by the minute. Initially reported as the simple case of an elite NFL athlete sitting on his butt rather than stand during the National Anthem and subsequently justifying his conduct stating:

    “I am not going to stand up to show pride in a flag for a country that oppresses black people and people of color.” ~ Colin Kaepernick (snip)

    Kaepernick is converting to Islam because of his idiot girlfriend (why any sane woman would adhere Islam is beyond me, but that’s another piece for another day).
    The girlfriend, DJ Nessa, is a big Black Lives Matter activist. The following is a typical post on her twitter account:
    DJ Nessa Twit

    The “horrors” that black folks experience in America? Oh yeah, let’s look at the horrors inflicted on that poor black child, Colin Kaepernick.

    He is forced to live in sub-standard housing: picture a $10 million house.

    And he suffers the ignominy of being a professional football player and making a paltry sum of money:

    Colin Kaepernick signed a 6 year, $114,000,000 contract with the San Francisco 49ers, including a $12,328,766 signing bonus, $61,000,000 guaranteed, and an average annual salary of $19,000,000. In 2016, Kaepernick will earn a base salary of $11,900,000, a roster bonus of $2,000,000 and a workout bonus of $400,000.

    This should be a full issue of The Onion, but sadly it is not. Kaepernick has been brainwashed by a Muslim woman.

    The real horror for Black Americans comes in the inner cities and urban neighborhoods where black gangs rule and honest Black Americans live in terror. On that point Kaepernick is dead silent. He is only mouthing propaganda fed him by his Muslim lady. From the perspective of the ironically named Black Lives Matter crowd the only threat is from police. The real bloodshed and carnage is from black on black violence, most of it fueled by battles over turf by drug gangs. Colin has nothing to say about that.

    I hope he loses every sponsor. I hope he is out of the NFL this season. He is a disgusting example of privileged ignorance. The truly sad part of this is that he was raised by two white adoptive parents. Can you imagine sacrificing for a kid like this and then being told you are a racist piece of shit because you dared to love him?

  51. I heard that athlete at a press conference, and it seemed so clear he was merely parroting headlines or MSM talking points. When he said that we’ve got a slew of racist cops murdering blacks, I knew he was a head case, no critical thinking skills, no searching out further information. He’s just another tool, albeit a rich one, another idiot athlete being overpaid.

  52. admin
    August 29, 2016 at 1:13 pm
    —————
    Sounds like the same women-hating alt-left pigs that helped put Obama in office. That no one bats an eye about the existence of such a group shows how far women have regressed.

    Hillary has painted herself into an ugly corner. I guess she is relying on Blowfeld’s ability to deliver the election even if Trump actually wins.

  53. Wbb,

    I always thought most of the 5 on Fox were lightweights. Just like Joe and God forbid, Mika..Joe and Mika are worse…I did use to like Perino, but they got rid of her, a spitfire, and now she has a lawsuit…

  54. Hillary singled out Alex Jones and condemned his dark heart, etc.

    She would have been better off to have ignored him.

    Because nothing on earth could have delighted him more.

    It led to this rebuttal which was posted on Drudge today.

    That ties many loose ends together.

    But the only way people will believe it is if they understand what a former deputy secretary of the treasury said about her:

    We know from their words and deeds and material success that the Clintons are agents for Wall Street, the Big Banks, the military/security complex, Israel, agribusiness, and the extractive industries. Their large personal fortune, approximately $120 million, and the $1,600 million in their foundation, much of which came from abroad in exchange for political favors, attests to the unchallengable fact that the Clintons are agents for the oligarchy that rules America, indeed, that rules the American Empire from Australia and Japan, through North America and Western and Eastern Europe to the Russian border.

    We know that Hillary, like Bill, is a liar.

    We know that Hillary is a warmonger.

    We know that Hillary made the most irresponsible statement ever uttered by a presidential candidate when she declared the President of Russia to be the “new Hitler,” thereby raising tensions between the nuclear powers to a higher level than existed during the Cold War.

    We know that Hillary is allied with the neoconservatives and that her belief in the neocons’ ideology of US world hegemony is likely to result in war with Russia and China.

    The following ties many loose ends together, in ways that cannot be dismissed as conspiracy theory, or for that matter the toxic maunderings of a vast right wing conspiracy, i.e.
    https://youtu.be/bemC4oAQEaw

  55. blowme0bama
    August 30, 2016 at 11:42 am
    ———
    There is a clear precedent for this/

    Henry Ford who was a strong anti Semitic imported a large Muslim population into Dearborne a century ago to offset the growing Jewish influence.

    Black politicians of the Coleman Young ilk (a former Mayor of Detroit, celebrated by the left for his Guinness Book of records level of corruption) will seize this opportunity to form a black muslim alliance with this group which is part of the Soros plan to destabilize this nation, as wikileaks will soon reveal. However, the impact on black unemployment will be devastating. But Soros does not care, any more than Madeline Albright cared about half a million children killed by neocon strategy in Bosnia, or Hillary cares about the unnecessary deaths of Americans defending the beseiged outpost of Benghazi. Any way you look at it, this is a tragedy of monumental proportion. The larger tragedy is how few people actually get it.

  56. I have a friend who is a medical doctor and is Persian. He emigrated here before the fall of the Shah. He is a very educated and urbane sort, and follows world and local events from that perspective. He claims to be a Republican but deplores their presidential candidates. When I was campaigning for Hillary he was not on board. But now he is, mainly by default. I did not realize this until yesterday. Granted, he did take shots against Trump for some of the statements he has made, which could have been a leading indicator of where he was coming from, but could just as easily have been a reaction to the messenger, rather than the message. He has been very critical of our policy in the Middle East, therefore I preferred to assume the latter. Until yesterday. I gave him a copy of the above article which lays bare what Hillary is all about, from a former Deputy Secretary of the Treasury, academician, and writer with first hand knowledge. I told him that those who are doing well under Obama (which means they have not felt the effects of his nation destroying policies in their own lives) will cherry pick the evidence to justify supporting Hillary, and those who are not doing well or realize that the current approach is a slow death for everyone will be more inclined to vote for Trump. At that point he lost his cool and urbane charm and told me that Trump is a bigot, etc. I let that one cool off rather than chasing it, and there was 5 minutes of silence. I told him that all I can do is put what I believe to be the truth out there, and I am not in the business of bullying anyone else into believing it. Furthermore, I can understand his feeling that Muslims like him are being singled out, even though the recent wave of terrorism in the west does appear to emanate almost exclusively from that source, including the most conspicuous example of 9/11. I tried to take back the article I had given him, but he wanted to keep it. My hope is that he realizes what he is buying in voting for Hillary, which includes the very neocon policies that have set the Middle East including his former country on fire, and will inevitably lead to a nuclear confrontation with Russia and China. From my perspective, and notwithstanding what I once believed about Hillary this is an easy decision. For him, if he thinks about it deeply, as he is fully capable of doing, it may be more akin to the lesser of two evils.

  57. it is amazing to see how even Fox LIES about what Donald Trump is saying…

    He has a couple of people at Fox who have his back…Hannity, Eric Bolling,Stuart Varney and Lou Dobbs, maybe Fox & Friends and sometimes O’Rielly…and a few of the female hosts play it straight…Martha Mulhulland (?)

    but for the most part…Fox puts Trump under a microscope and disects him way beyond anything they to do Hillary…Wallace, Wills, Carl Cameron, Shepard…the Wall St gang on the weekends, Dorothy Rabowitz (sp) Stephens at WSJ, Chris something who interprets the race, etc…they all go after Trump with a vengence and mocking, ridiculing tone…and they purposely misrepresent what he has said…and/or what he means…

    It is remarkable that Donald has withstood this from all angles and is actually getting stronger and closing the polls…and expanding his reach for voters traditional republicans don’t even mention…and yet Donald is actually “going into the hood” as I heard the Paster Jackson from Impact TV say last night on CNN

    … btw…that man, i think his name is Pastor Jackson from Impact tv who has been a democrat all his life and so has all his family and voted for O twice…was fantastic on CNN…he had to battle Charles Blow and Don Lemon…but he was so objective and strong and fair…it was wonderful…

    I am sure hearing other black Democrats talk the way this man did must scare the hell out of Hillary and the Left…

    Foxy you are so at good finding clips…I tried…if you have the inclination he was on Don Lemon last night with Charles Blow and another black supporter for Trump, I do not know his name…

    Blow and Lemon did their best to race bait but Pastor Jackson would have none of it…

    and he said he has taken a lot of flack because he is going to give Donald a chance to express himself and his policies

    that is going to be something to watch…

  58. http://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/politics/2016/08/29/detroit-pastor-trump/89528324/

    snip

    The Detroit pastor who is hosting Donald Trump at his congregation on Saturday is defending his decision to let the Republican presidential candidate appeal to African-American voters on his Christian television network.

    Bishop Wayne T. Jackson acknowledged Monday he has faced backlash from some Detroit black leaders for inviting Trump to sit down for a one-on-one interview on his Impact Network television show.

    “There’s a lot of emotions going on right now — people are upset that he’s coming to Detroit,” Jackson told The Detroit News. “… But if we don’t sit down to talk to him, we’ll never know what his policies are. It’s not an endorsement, it is an engagement — so let’s talk.”

    Trump will attend an 11 a.m. service at Jackson’s church, Great Faith Ministries International, on Grand River and then will sit for a one-on-one interview, Jackson said.

    The pastor said he has several questions about Trump’s plans for helping low-income blacks get better education and training opportunities as well as the politically charged topic of the New York businessman’s personal views about minorities.

    “I’m going to ask him that question: Are you a racist?” Jackson said. “I’m going to ask him questions that pertain to the heart of our community. … But there’s a lot of emotional anger tied to this, and we need to make sure that our concerns as a community are met.”

    snip it goes on

    *******************************

    I already love this man…silly idealistic me…this is what I always believed was the way we should communicate…out in the open and fair

  59. Listening to this guy on Hannity, he makes a point that Gary Johnsons votes are coming from nottrumpers..And that hillary will push for him to be in the debates. He is at 10%, they will manufacturer a faux poll at 15% and suck more votes from him..

  60. The journalist who questioned Hillary’s health on Huffington Post and got banned is now on a rampage and is #NeverHillary. He has put out a video to say that he is not suicidal, not accident prone and does not drive a car. He and his family have been threatened for daring to put out an article questioning her health and has said he must be right over the target to be threatened this way.

    Here’s a link to the video he posted where he is concerned he will be killed: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2016/08/29/huffington_post_contributor_says_he_was_fired_for_posting_article_about_hillarys_health.html

    These are some of the things he’s posting on Twitter:

    Hastings’ death, a fiery car crash less than a year after whatever upset Hillary’s State Dept people. Connected?

    Although speculation, the picture emerging is phenomenally gross: a very ill woman with “fixers” around her 24/7 to kill off those who leak.

    @PrisonPlanet not so crazy now for me to have publicly stated I’m mentally well, not clumsy, don’t own a car or gun on-site. #HillaryKills

  61. When they say the world is falling apart under the glorious regime of the most intelligent man to ever occupy the White House according to Presidential Historian and revolting ass kisser extraordinaire Michael Bechloss, and all his big media accolytes who are, despite conclusive evidence to the contrary, still in a state of rapture where he is concerned, I guess this is one of the contributions they are referring to. We can only imagine what Obama III will look like–most likely World War III. In that same vein it is worth recalling that a large contingent of state department lackeys have advocated that very thing in a petition they sent to the Messiah, so he can stick it up his ass, if he is not too busy playing golf.
    —————-
    Syria: Their War, Not Ours
    Monday – August 29, 2016 at 11:40 pm

    By Patrick J. Buchanan

    The debacle that is U.S. Syria policy is today on naked display.

    NATO ally Turkey and U.S.-backed Arab rebels this weekend attacked our most effective allies against ISIS, the Syrian Kurds.

    Earlier in August, U.S. planes threatened to shoot down Syrian planes over Hasakeh, and our Iraq-Syria war commander, Lt. Gen. Stephen Townsend, issued a warning to Syria and Russia against any further air strikes around the city.

    Who authorized Gen. Townsend to threaten to shoot down Syrian or Russian planes — in Syria?

    When did Congress authorize an American war in Syria? Is the Constitution now inoperative?

    That we are sinking into a civil war where we sometimes seem to be fighting both sides is a tribute to the fecklessness of the Barack Obama-John Kerry foreign policy and the abdication of a Congress that refuses to either name our real enemy or authorize our deepening involvement.

    If they are going to lose Syria, Assad, Iran, Hezbollah and the Russians are probably going to go down fighting. And should we decide to fight a war to take them down, we would find ourselves with such de facto allies as ISIS and the al-Nusra Front, an affiliate of al-Qaida.

    Our Congress appears again to have abdicated its war powers.

    Consider the forces that have turned Syria into a charnel house with 400,000 dead and millions injured, maimed and uprooted.

    The American people would never sustain such a war in the company of such allies, with its risks of escalation, to remove Assad, who, whatever we think of him, never terrorized Americans or threatened U.S. vital interests.

    Years ago, Assad dismissed Obama’s demand that he surrender power, then defied Obama’s “red line” against the use of chemical weapons. He is not going to depart because some U.S. president tells him he must go.

    How does the U.S. protect its interests while avoiding a deeper involvement in this war?

    First, recognize that ISIS and the al-Nusra Front are our primary enemies in Syria, not Assad or Russia. Geostrategists may be appalled, but the Donald may have gotten it right. If the Russians are willing to fight to crush ISIS, to save Assad, be our guest.

    Second, oppose any removal of Assad unless and until we are certain he will not be replaced by an Islamist regime.

    Third, we should assure the Turks we will keep the Kurds east of the Euphrates and not support any Kurdish nation-state that involves any secession from Turkey.

    America’s best and wisest course is to stop this slaughter that is killing a thousand Syrians a week, use our forces in concert with any and all allies to annihilate the Nusra Front and ISIS, keep the Kurds and Turks apart, effect a truce if we can, and then get out. It’s not our war.

  62. yheitman

    August 30, 2016 at 5:13 pm

    ********************************

    yheitman…thanks for posting that article and clip

    did you see that photo of the Huffington Post ‘editors’?

    Are they kidding…a bunch of 20/30 year old white girls…oh brother…probably all volunteering for Hillary’s camp

    …and these are the people that complain to everyone else about diversity…

    give me a break…the hypocrisy never ends

    also…he hits the nail on the head regarding how all these media outlets do not even book opposing POV…just the same propoganda over and over again about Donald being a racist, misogynist…bla, bla, bla

    what the hell has happened to our country?

  63. Andrea Mitchell, that iconic world class journalist conducts a scorched earth interview of Ann Coulter. However, 20 seconds into it, she loses control of the witness totally. The self described tough girl reporter from Philadelphia ignores everything and focuses on one issue: does Donald really intent to deport 40 million illegals, and if not, who must go and who gets to stay. The reason why the Georgetown, upper East Side and Hollywood elites obsess over this question to the exclusion of everything else he says on the subject, is because they believe it places him on the horns of a dilemma, where he must decide which constituency to alienate. Ann used it as an opportunity to expound on everything else, and handled this adroitly.

    http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2016/08/29/coulter_does_the_american_taxpayer_want_to_pay_for_illegal_immigrants_to_stay.html

  64. Beware of scams:

    http://www.politico.com/story/2016/08/donald-trump-fundraiser-hawes-227486

    Meet the man siphoning money from Donald Trump

    A 25-year-old with no Trump ties raises $1 million by dangling ‘dinner’ with the GOP nominee.

    At a glance, the two websites look virtually indistinguishable. Both feature a photo of Donald Trump, in a suit and red tie, in front of a giant American flag. Both seemingly offer a chance for two to win dinner with Donald Trump.

    One is at donaldjtrump.com; the other is at dinnerwithtrump.org.

    The first belongs to Trump’s campaign. The second is a scheme run by Ian Hawes, a 25-year-old Maryland man who has no affiliation with Trump or his campaign and who has preyed on more than 20,000 unsuspecting donors, collecting more than $1 million in the process.

    In just its first three weeks of operation, Hawes’ PAC spent more than $108,000 on Facebook ads, offering an opportunity to win “Dinner with Donald Trump” — and netted itself nearly $350,000 in donations, according to federal records.

    The biggest chunk of the money raised — $133,000 — went to a company that Hawes founded and owns, CartSoft LLC. The purpose of the payments is described on federal records as “media” and “media purchasing,” though CartSoft’s website describes itself as an online payment-processing platform.

    Since its launch, the PAC has collected more than $1 million, Hawes told POLITICO. It has reportedly spent $0 on behalf of Trump.

    “I feel ripped off and taken advantage of. This is horrible. That was not my intent,” said Mary Pat Kulina, who owns a paper-shredding company in Maryland and gave $265 to Hawes’ group. Kulina thought she had given to Trump’s campaign until told otherwise by POLITICO. “This is robbery,” she said. “I want my money back and I want them to add up what they stole from people and give it to Donald Trump.”

    Of the 156 donors who gave more than $200 to Hawes’ group in June — the threshold for names to be included in federal filings — POLITICO contacted dozens and spoke with 11. Everyone interviewed said they believed they had given to Trump’s campaign, not an unconnected PAC.

    “I would say, unfortunately, that’s simply a matter of pure chance,” Hawes said in an interview defending his group and denying it is a scam.

    Hours after POLITICO published this story, Trump’s campaign sent a letter to Hawes accusing him of “defrauding” his donors and asking him to cease-and-desist.

    But the dinner scheme is just the beginning. By late July, Hawes — who in his Twitter bio calls himself a “registered genius, board certified hacker, and grape soda connoisseur” — had launched another website, crookedhillary2016.org, according to Internet domain registration records, and began promoting a contest to revoke her security clearance. The group’s Facebook page copies the “Crooked Hillary” logo that is used on Trump’s official LyingCrookedHillary.com site.

    “We’re raising $1 million dollars from small donors to fight Crooked Hillary’s campaign of lies,” reads Hawes’ site. Hawes also registered imwithtrump.org in late June, records show, though that site remains dormant.

    As of Sunday, Hawes’ group had raised $1.1 million from 21,253 donors, he said. More than 410,000 people had signed up for the dinner contest — giving him a massive email list he can leverage for more money for years to come. [snip]

    Because Hawes’ PAC has zero ties to Trump’s campaign, the dinner it is dangling won’t be very intimate. The fine print — in gray, size 8.5-font on a black background at the bottom of the website — discloses that this “dinner” actually amounts to the PAC buying two tickets “at a Sponsor-selected fundraising evening event held with Donald Trump and other attendees.”

    Much more at link.

  65. And if they refuse to refund your money, then you can dispute the charge with your credit card company. It will show up as a charge to TRUMP MAKE AMERICA GRE on your list of transactions.

  66. Well this is worrisome. Obama may try to declare a Trump victory in November null and void by claiming that the elections were hacked by Russians.
    ————
    Naaaw

    Worry if you like.

    But here is the bottom line:

    After January 20, he’s OUT.

    Like a tubercular lugie on the sidwalk.

    Don’t pick it up, don’t step on it, wash it away.

    Out brief candle.

    OUT!!!

  67. Homeland Security to take over election?

    http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/homeland-eyes-special-declaration-to-take-charge-of-elections/article/2600592

    Eyes? Ebony eyes?

    The real threat to our elections is not Putin.

    The real threat to our elections is Soros.

    He is the one who is focused on this.

    And will that big black palooka Jeh–no not Jeb–Jeh–an h not a b

    For Christsake that is not a name.

    Oh silly goose yes it is.

    Okay, assuming it is a name.

    Then tell me this:

    If this muthah (expletive deleted) is going to be supervising the elections

    Is this NOT a case of the fox guarding the chicken coop?????

    Obama supervising Obama.

    Give me a fucking break.

    The threat is not Putin.

    The threat is Soros.

  68. wbboei
    August 29, 2016 at 8:50 pm

    http://www.podcastone.com/pg/jsp/program/episode.jsp?programID=843&pid=1671032

    …..

    wbb, I think this link of yours bears repeating.
    According to the beginning portion of Dick Morris’
    podcast claims there is a ‘smoking gun’ where ‘Hillary’s pay to play’ scheme has been tied to at least one
    documented transaction she arranged as SOS. (I’m sure someone will use it for a foundation to build on forming a pattern) Which BTW has not been picked up by MSM.

    I think this news is starting to overwhelm her and she will inevitably be replaced well before the General election. Especially, if all the tantalizing prognostications coming from Assange at Wikileaks become true…

    Then, imho, she is most likely going to have to step down and relinquish her delegates to a new nominee.

    I see no other way forward for her.

  69. If I were a member of congress, I would demand two things:

    1. Don’t give me this melarky that Russia is preparing to hack the election—UNLESS YOU CAN SHOW ME CLEAR, COGENT AND CONVINCING PROOF that this assertion is true. I am sorry, rumors, suppositions etc. just don’t cut it. Given the fact that the FBI rolled over for the dims, they do not enjoy any presumption of neutrality. They may be right, or they may be acting on someone else’s orders. Show me the proof. Your word is no longer enough. I want to make my own determination.

    2. Show me the proof that if you allow this Jeh creature to take over the elections, that he will not throw the election to Hillary. Show me the proof that Soros is not behind this. Only a fool would take things as they are presented. 99% of the time what we hear from this administration is a convenient lie designed to serve a political objective. Knowing his history of nuance and evasion, what proof do we have that when Jeh abuses his power someone will be there to catch him in flagrante delicto, rather than after the election? This is important.

  70. Sorry this article spent an over night in the spam filter.. you can access the link below if you care to read it in it’s entirety:

    http://www.hillaryis44.org/2016/08/27/despicable-goes-around-hillary-clinton-hillary2016-race-bait-realdonaldtrump-trumppence2016/#comment-476723

    The U.S. Department of Clinton

    This is the week that the steady drip, drip, drip of details about Hillary Clinton’s server turned into a waterfall. This is the week that we finally learned why Mrs. Clinton used a private communications setup, and what it hid. This is the week, in short, that we found out that the infamous server was designed to hide that Mrs. Clinton for three years served as the U.S. Secretary of the Clinton Foundation.

    In March this column argued that while Mrs. Clinton’s mishandling of classified information was important, it missed the bigger point. The Democratic nominee obviously didn’t set up her server with the express purpose of exposing national secrets—that was incidental. She set up the server to keep secret the details of the Clintons’ private life—a life built around an elaborate and sweeping money-raising and self-promoting entity known as the Clinton Foundation

  71. As if we need MORE stress!!

    IRS doesn’t tell 1M taxpayers that illegals stole their Social Security numbers

    The IRS has discovered more than 1 million Americans whose Social Security numbers were stolen by illegal immigrants, but officials never bothered to tell the taxpayers themselves, the agency’s inspector general said in a withering new report released Tuesday.

    Investigators first alerted the IRS to the problem five years ago, but it’s still not fixed, the inspector general said, and a pilot program meant to test a solution was canceled, and fell woefully short anyway.

    As a result most taxpayers don’t learn that their identities have been stolen and their Social Security files may be screwed up.

    “Taxpayers identified as victims of employment-related identity theft are not notified,” the inspector general said.

    Victims’ numbers are stolen by illegal immigrants who need to give employers a valid Social Security number in order to get a job. Employers are prohibited from probing too deeply into numbers, even when they suspect fraud.

    http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/aug/30/irs-doesnt-tell-1-million-taxpayers-that-illegal

  72. So… is there both an official “have dinner with Donald” contest AND a fraud one – or is there only the fraud one….?

  73. Ok I answered my own question, there two sites. I think my invitation came from 88022, so I think I’m safe!

  74. Breaking
    Donald considering going to Mexico tomorrow morning to meet with Mexican President

    Let’s see if he mentions it at the rally starting soon

    Donald seems to be good at preemption

  75. Mika & Joe…their heads must be spinning
    The whole punditry. ..they don’t know what’s going on

    Donald loves to be unpredictable

    I love it

  76. Gonzo:

    I still had the page qued up in my computer;

    if you want to read the rest of it:

    ………..

    Victims’ numbers are stolen by illegal immigrants who need to give employers a valid Social Security number in order to get a job. Employers are prohibited from probing too deeply into numbers, even when they suspect fraud.

    But the IRS learns of the scam when the illegal immigrants file their taxes using a special Individual Taxpayer Identification Number (ITIN) the agency doles out chiefly to illegal immigrants as a way of making sure they’re paying taxes even if they’re not supposed to be in the U.S.

    Between 2011 and 2015 the agency flagged nearly 1.1 million returns where someone appeared to have stolen a valid Social Security number, the inspector general said.

    The IRS did not have any new comment on the findings, instead referring reporters to an official response filed with the inspector general, in which the agency insisted it’s making progress.

    Karen Schiller, commissioner for the IRS‘ small business and self-employed division, said the 2014 pilot program was helpful, even if it didn’t completely solve the notification problem, and said the agency will try to alert all taxpayers beginning next year.

    “As we continue to battle and make progress against all strains of identity theft in the tax ecosystem, we recognized that we were missing an important partner in this effort — the taxpaying public,” said Ms. Schiller, who had the task of answering the inspector general.

    She also vowed to figure out a system to let the Social Security Administration (SSA) know if someone’s number has been stolen.

    Under the 2014 pilot program, the IRS did notify some 25,000 taxpayers whose SSNs were pilfered. The notice they received told them to contact credit-monitoring agencies to try to head off any more damage to their personal finances.

    But the IRS said it’s prevented by federal law from telling taxpayers who stole their identity.

    The IRS says its role is not to enforce immigration laws but rather to collect taxes. The agency issues ITINs to ensure that unauthorized workers can still file tax returns, even if they aren’t supposed to be working in the U.S.
    Taxpayers who use an ITIN are eligible for some tax credits, particularly for their children who are U.S. citizens.

    Congressional Republicans have long complained to the IRS that it is protecting illegal immigrants from discovery by allowing the use of ITINs but failing to share the information with other agencies.

    Mr. Coats, who has written legislation requiring victims to be notified, even confronted IRS officials about their lax behavior at a hearing in April.

    “All of us can agree that victims need to know that they’re victims, and need to know that an agency of the federal government, whether it’s IRS or whether it’s SSA, or both, ought to have some ability to talk to each other,” Mr. Coats said.

    IRS Commissioner John G. Koskinen told Mr. Coats at the hearing that in many of the cases, friends or relatives lent their Social Security numbers to the unauthorized workers, and already know their information is being fraudulently used.

    He also said the agency struggled to come up with a solution that wouldn’t chase illegal immigrants away from filing their taxes altogether.

    “Obviously, priority for taxpayers and the IRS is collecting those taxes,” he said.

    Mr. Koskinen testified at the time that it may take new legislation from Congress to let his agency inform taxpayers they’d been the subject of identity theft.

    But the hiccup in communicating with the Social Security Administration seems like it should be easier to solve. The inspector general, however, said the IRS didn’t have a system set up to make sure SSA always knew of the fraud.

    In some cases IRS employees said they sent a notice, but the Social Security Administration had no record of it. In other cases, it appears the IRS didn’t even bother to make a notification.

    “The lack of a formal process to ensure that the SSA is notified of income not associated with an innocent taxpayer is problematic because this notification is essential to ensure that victims’ Social Security benefits are not affected,” the inspector general said.

    Pray tell HOW did illegals have the expertise and the resources to hack into the IRS taxpayer files?

    Sounds like another false flag..

  77. lol I just realized something –

    When Trump reads The Snake, he’s alluding to the refugees – but it’s also what would be true if Hillary were to get elected, the public would be saying why are you screwing us, and she would laugh at us, you KNEW I was corrupt and greedy and not for the public good before you elected me, it was all over the news!

    Moral of the story – Hillary the Snake cannot be elected….

  78. I remember when Obama was campaigning (2008?), he went to Africa to help his cousin Odinga (or something) get elected, and it was illegal.

    So I’m wondering about Trump going to MX while running – but I think the difference must be that he is not campaigning for their candidate to affect their country – he’s going, invited, to explain his border wall plans for OUR country, maybe immigration. But he’s going to share his plans for America, not try to alter the other country.

    (they can like it or hate it, but he’s going to do it!!! – but perhaps he’s going to try to help them accept it)

  79. lorac
    August 30, 2016 at 10:57 pm

    Here ya go! I was able to get it by googling “black lives matter to Trump.”

    http://www.wsj.com/articles/black-lives-matter-to-donald-trump-1472512378

    Black Lives Matter to Donald Trump

    By
    Heather Mac Donald

    Aug. 29, 2016 7:13 p.m. ET
    Hillary Clinton tried to tar Donald Trump as a racist last week by associating him with the “alt-right.” Yet it is Mr. Trump who has decried the loss of black life to violent crime—and has promptly been declared biased for doing so. Whether intentionally or not, Mr. Trump has exposed the hypocrisy of the Black Lives Matter movement and its allies.

    Speaking in West Bend, Wis., on Aug. 16, only days after the recent riots in Milwaukee, Mr. Trump observed that during “the last 72 hours . . . another nine were killed in Chicago and another 46 were wounded.” The victims, as in other cities with rising crime, were overwhelmingly black.

    Bringing safety to inner-city residents should be a top presidential priority, Mr. Trump said: “Our job is to make life more comfortable for the African-American parent who wants their kids to be able to safely walk the streets and walk to school. Or the senior citizen waiting for a bus. Or the young child walking home from school.” Mr. Trump promised to restore law and order “for the sake of all, but most especially for the sake of those living in the affected communities.”

    The reaction was swift. The progressive website Crooks and Liars deemed Mr. Trump’s speech a “mashup of Hitler and George Wallace.” On CNN the activist and former Obama adviser Van Jones called it “despicable” and “shocking in its divisiveness.” Historian Josh Zeitz told USA Today that “the term law and order in modern American politics is, ipso facto, a racially tinged term.”

    Mr. Trump’s acceptance speech in July at the Republican National Convention provoked similar dismay. “Young Americans in Baltimore, in Chicago, in Detroit, in Ferguson,” he said, have “the same right to live out their dreams as any other child in America.”

    This defense of black children was too much for Alicia Garza, a co-founder of the Black Lives Matter movement. “The terrifying vision that Donald J. Trump is putting forward casts him alongside some of the worst fascists in history,” Ms. Garza said. The executive director of the Advancement Project, Judith Browne Dianis, complained that “the speech lends itself to be interpreted as isolating and scapegoating of communities of color.” Political commentator Sally Kohn wrote in Time that Mr. Trump “has basically recycled Richard Nixon’s version of dog whistle racism by insisting he is the ‘law and order candidate’—implicitly protecting White America.”

    Why this frenzied effort to demonize Mr. Trump for addressing the heightened violence in inner cities? Because the Republican nominee has also correctly identified its cause: the false “narrative of cops as a racist force in our society,” as he put it in Wisconsin.

    Ever since the Black Lives Matter movement burst onto the national scene in 2014, following the fatal police shooting of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Mo., violent crime has surged in urban areas. In America’s largest 56 cities, homicides rose 17% last year, the largest one-year increase in more than two decades. In Washington, D.C., homicides jumped 54%; in Milwaukee, 73%; in Cleveland, 90%.

    The reason is a drop-off in the proactive policing that activists and academics denounce as racist. While cops continue to rush to 911 calls in minority neighborhoods, they are making fewer pedestrian stops and engaging in less public-order enforcement. Backing off such activity is presumably what Black Lives Matter supporters, including President Obama, want.

    Yet the victims of the resulting crime surge are almost exclusively black; whites have largely been unaffected. In Baltimore, 45 people were killed in July 2015, 43 of them black. In Chicago, 2,460 blacks were shot last year, lethally or non-lethally, according to the city’s police department. That’s nearly seven a day. Seventy-eight white residents were shot in 2015, though the white share of the Chicago population is about the same as the black share. Blacks in Chicago were 18 times more likely to be killed last year than whites, up from eight times more likely in 2005.

    Police shootings are a minute fraction of this carnage. So far this year in Chicago, they account for about 0.5% of all shootings. Four studies published this year alone have further undercut the claim that we are living through an epidemic of racially biased policing shootings. Harvard economist Roland Fryer, for example, examined data from Dallas, Austin, Houston, Los Angeles and six Florida counties. He found no evidence of racial discrimination in police shootings; officers in Houston were nearly 24% less likely to shoot blacks than whites.

    When Mr. Trump pledges to restore law and order, he is not promising to “protect White America,” in Sally Kohn’s words. He is addressing a problem that whites could easily ignore, if they were the bigots that the Black Lives Matter movement and nearly the whole of academia make them out to be.

    Strangely, it is Mr. Obama and Black Lives Matter sympathizers who have turned their eyes from the rising black victimization. FBI Director James Comey warned last October that the “chill wind blowing through American law enforcement” was leading to a “huge increase” in urban homicides and shootings. Mr. Obama promptly accused him of “cherry-picking data” and having a “political agenda.”

    After Mr. Trump drew attention in his convention speech to the rising urban violence, President Obama again dismissed the casualties as merely an “uptick in murders and violent crime in some cities.” It is hard not to translate this is as: white lives matter; black lives, not so much.

    Mr. Trump’s call to restore law and order recognizes the right of inner-city residents to enjoy the same freedom from fear that the rest of America now takes for granted, thanks to the 20-year decline in crime brought on by the proactive policing revolution of the 1990s. Mr. Trump has issued a much-needed warning that the antipolice narrative is putting black lives in jeopardy and undercutting the foundation of a civilized society. It is a message he should amplify.

    Ms. Mac Donald is a fellow at the Manhattan Institute and the author of “The War on Cops.”

  80. Lorac
    I thought I heard someone say that dt & hillary both were invited by the Mexican president & she has not responded

  81. Hopefully his visit to the palace and back to his plane will not turn into that scene in the movie Sicario where Emily Blunt watches in horror as cartel guys try to attack her convoy at the border.

  82. Tony, you are so sweet! It looks to be my same link – I must have used up my alloted free articles for the month, because it was behind a paywall for me. Thanks so much!!!

  83. OT. Prompted by TheHill rpt: Exclusive: Kochs pull ads from Ohio Senate race, which is about Rob Portman’s favorable position in his state’s race, I lit off an unfavorable tweet referencing his $25K indiscretion against Chris McDaniel, MS 2014.
    Now someone on his team has added me to its “PortmanTrump16/make-ohio-great-again”list. I wonder how many Republicans are involved in this pursuit.

    Have you seen Donald Jr defending his dad’s immigration stance to Anderson Cooper? http://youtu.be/mtZIdWpeO9I

  84. Apologies. I assumed this video was jr’s statement on dad’s immigration. Instead it’s a hillary basher. was not my intention.

  85. Here it is:
    Trump’s son: Dad’s immigration position not ‘softening on anything’ Video
    By Naomi Lim, CNN
    Updated 8:32 PM ET, Tue August 30, 2016

    “…He wasn’t softening on anything. He didn’t change his stance on anything,” Trump Jr. told CNN’s Anderson Cooper. “What he did was, and what he’s done all along is, he’s speaking with the people. He’s not lecturing them like most of the politicians you see today. He’s actually having a conversation. He added: “He basically surveyed the room and asked, ‘Hey, what are your thoughts on this? I want to take that because I want to take into account what the people say.'””
    http://www.cnn.com/2016/08/30/politics/donald-trump-jr-immigration/

    HLN aired Jason Carroll (PIX11?), whom Robin Meade pushed to admit the private meeting will help Donald’s
    Presidential credentials.
    ☺ ☺ ☺

  86. I will be happy when Donald is back safely in the USA
    He has a packed day…& weekend in Detroit

    Hillary is fundraising & partying in the Hamptons

  87. Foxy 11:41..the Democratic voter really doesn’t care
    ..47% will vote for her regardless…it’s the 4% the billions are being spent for, but with her minimalist campaign, one has to wonder…with Homeland Security wanting to take over the election…my glass is often half full.

  88. A new paradigm has emerged:

    80% of the “conspiracy theories” about the dims turn out to be true.

    100% of the explanations by the dims about what they are doing turn out to be lies.

    And that is why we cannot allow the Homeland Security department of Obama to unilaterally monitor the November election.

    The Putin excuse is as much of a red herring as the insistence that voter id laws are discriminatory.

    If you want to know who the perp is who will try to steal the election, look to Soros.

  89. If Trump wins, Soros will die a broken man, an abject failure, and the last Nazi will have slipped the mortal coil.

  90. The “123 Deal” was a 2009 agreement between the United Arab Emirates and the US on materials and technological sharing for nuclear energy production.
    —–
    What the fuck is Hillary doing?

    Where is our national interest in doing something like this?

    Why does a country rich with oil need nuclear energy production?

    Unless it intends to produce a bomb?

    Lest we forget, UAE along with lobbyists staged a false narrative and perjurious testimony to congress on the Eve of Desert Shield to get Poppy to attack Hussein.

    How much money did UAE contribute to CGI?

Comments are closed.