Update: What is The double standard which allows Dana Milbank to call Scott Walker “a coward”? Apparently Gov. Walker says he doesn’t know if Obama loves his country as former Mayor Rudy Giuliani has charged and therefore Walker is denounced as a “coward” by the dishonest and cowardly Washington Post.
Why would Rudy say such a thing? Who could doubt Obama tells the truth on such a question??? Who??? We remember this picture from 2007?
When the above picture was taken Obama bamboozled as he did when Obama mentor “God Damn America” Jeremiah Wright became an issue:
“You’re standing with your arms folded and Hillary’s got her hand on her heart,” she said, adding that she received so many of these emails she is sick of them. [snip]
Obama called the circulation of such pictures a “dirty trick” and mentioned other emails accusing him of being “a Muslim plant.”
Brian Williams Obama.
Obama wants his second term to be an unrestrained attack on Israel. Muslims set fire to prisoners, Christian martyrs’ heads roll, Jews are assaulted and killed 1930s style – but Obama thinks Jews are the problem. Particularly one Jew by the name of Netanyahu.
According to David Axelrod’s new book, Obama felt unrestrained in his second term and wanted to prioritize an “Bulworth” attack on Israel’s Netanyahu on behalf of Israel’s enemies. Break Netanyahu, Obama reasons, and then break the Israeli opposition parties who like Netanyahu will not surrender Jerusalem and lands won after the perfidious Muslim Arab “Six Day” war on Israel.
What depravity would compel Obama to focus on Israel as a target during his second term? Rudy Giuliani was too timid in his recent diagnosis of Barack Obama affections. Typically, the media rushes to defend Obama’s honor from Rudy Giuliani.
Rudy spoke the conclusion we came to a long time ago after Obama’s actions so trended in one direction that we could no longer excuse his direction as a compass failure. The direction Obama takes is intentional.
Obama be damned, on March 3 Netanyahu will address the American congress. It will be yet another moment of spectacular Obama implosion. In truth Obama has already lost the battle against Netanyahu and the war against Israel.
The war against Israel Obama lost in one day in Paris. The Obama losses mounted as news from Copenhagen and ISIS atrocities exploded in red blood worldwide.
The Obama war against Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu was also lost with one voice in the New York Times:
Nobel winner Elie Wiesel lends support to Netanyahu’s U.S. speech
Nobel Peace Prize laureate and Holocaust survivor Elie Wiesel is lending his support to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s March 3 speech to Congress on the dangers of Iran’s nuclear program – an address that has antagonized the White House and divided American Jews.
An outspoken New Jersey Orthodox rabbi, Shmuley Boteach, said on Thursday he is placing full-page advertisements in two of the leading U.S. newspapers, The New York Times and The Washington Post, featuring Wiesel’s endorsement of Netanyahu’s speech. [snip]
The advertisement quotes Wiesel as saying he plans to attend Netanyahu’s address “on the catastrophic danger of a nuclear Iran.” Awarded the Nobel in 1986, Wiesel asks Obama and others in the ad: “Will you join me in hearing the case for keeping weapons from those who preach death to Israel and America?”
Speaking to Reuters by phone, Boteach said: “There’s no personality more respected in the global Jewish community and few in the wider world than Elie Wiesel. He is a living prince of the Jewish people.”
“He is the face of the murdered 6 million (Jews killed in the Holocaust). So I think that his view on the prime minister’s speech sounding the alarm as to the Iranian nuclear program carries a unique authority that transcends some of the political circus that has affected the speech,” Boteach said.
Wiesel earned his Nobel Peace Prize. Hillary Clinton should march side by side with Wiesel and listen to Israeli Prime Minister Nethanyahu’s address to congress on March 3. Whether Hillary is next to him or not a picture of Wiesel and Netanyahu in the American congress will be seen as the ultimate failure of Obama’s war against Israel.
Obama is treacherous and he is also a boob. At every level Obama fails and fails. Obama attacks America’s friends and succors America’s enemies. Rudy Giuliani understands. We do too. But we do not doubt that America will outlast treacherous Obama. In large part America will outlast treacherous Obama because, well, Obama is a boob. The Obama failures grow:
It is remarkable that despite all of the political talent, goodwill and positive momentum Barack Obama had when he came into office, his policies – both domestic and international – are in tatters. And it is ironic that the former law professor’s two biggest “accomplishments” — Obamacare and executive orders on immigration — are hanging precariously by a legal thread.
The long arm of the law is catching up with Obama.
We have written for a long time that like all con artists, three-card monte thieves, and flim-flam men, Obama is running to keep one step ahead of the law. Yup, “The long arm of the law is catching up with Obama:”
The King v. Burwell ruling looming in the Supreme Court could completely undermine the viability of Obamacare if the justices rule that the law be interpreted as written, not as the White House now hopes. Meanwhile, 26 states have brought a case that would prevent Obama’s executive orders on immigration — which would create new exceptions for many individuals to stay in the United States in defiance of what has, up until now, been a well-established law — from being implemented. A federal court judge has issued a temporary injunctive order declaring that the case against the president can go forward. In both cases, Obama is left hoping that a sympathetic court will allow unprecedented one-man rule and create a new era in which a president can rewrite existing laws in a manner never contemplated in the Constitution.
It is especially humorous that the evisceration of ObamaCare will begin to take place in the Supreme Court the very next day, March 4, after Netanyahu on March 3 speaks to the American people from the well of the American congress.
As in Sharia Law, Barack Obama will have his hands cut off like a thief. The very Barack Obama who mocked the constitutional order and declared that like a monarch of old he would rule with the executive pen finds that the executive pen cannot dictate law neither to a free people, nor their courts, nor their congress. Obama is a failure because our system of laws, moving all too slowly, eventually moves:
The president’s glaring disregard of the plain language of the law is finally getting its day in court. His inability to orchestrate legislative victories and make our system work means he has turned to what suits his talent and personality best and what he probably wanted to do all along: govern by fiat. Much of Obama’s legacy is now dependent on the notion that he can declare what is plainly written in the law doesn’t apply or actually means something besides what the words on the page suggest. Liberal legal scholars are trying to come to his rescue with contorted logic that should infuriate voters. Obama’s last days in office will be clouded by his arguments that the laws don’t apply to him.
If Obamacare is hobbled by the courts and the president’s executive actions on immigration are brought to a screeching halt, combined with the anemic economy and a foreign policy in disarray, it’s hard to make the case that this is anything other than a failed presidency.
Unlike others we always took seriously the legal challenges to ObamaCare and Obama’s illegal illegal immigration diktats. This week District Court Judge Hanen blocked temporarily (and in this case temporarily means a long long time so long it is effectively an eternity) Obama’s illegal illegal immigration diktats. Here it is Friday still there is no White House garbage filing in the courts.
While many immediately derided Judge Hanen’s injunction and predicted it would be swiftly overturned, or soon overturned, or eventually overturned, or at some point in the long distant future overturned, a reading of Judge Hanen’s rulings dispel that notion. The New York Times choked on the truth:
WASHINGTON — President Obama’s lawyers, facing what could be months of delay on the White House’s immigration efforts, are struggling for a response to a Texas judge’s ruling that has imperiled one of the president’s potential legacy achievements.
A top administration official said Wednesday it was unclear whether the Department of Justice would seek an emergency order that would allow the president’s immigration programs to go into effect while an appeal proceeds. A spokeswoman for the Justice Department said that no decision had been made on an emergency application to an appeals court, but she pledged to fight all challenges to the president’s actions. [snip]
The ruling confronts the administration with a series of uncomfortable choices. Its decision will be affected by the reality that time is not its friend.
The Times is forced to concede that with only two more years of Obama horror left it could take, at best, “years” if Obama tried to finally comply with the Administrative Procedures Act; and it would take years to climb the appeals ladders whether at the Fifth Circuit or the Supreme Court.
Obama’s too clever by half illegal illegal immigration diktats have blown up in his face:
Contrary to widely held belief, Obama did not implement his plan to delay the deportation of more than 4 million illegal aliens through executive orders. Instead, he relied on a memorandum signed Nov. 20, 2014, by DHS Secretary Jeh Johnson, which DHS failed to file in the Federal Register as required by federal administrative law procedures.
“In his ruling on Monday that upended plans to shield millions of people from deportation, U.S. District Judge Andrew Hanen avoided diving into sweeping constitutional questions or tackling presidential powers head-on,” Reuters reported. “Instead, he faulted Obama for not giving public notice of his plans.”
Barack Obama thinks he is a monarch entitled to defy a free people and impose laws without the “consent of the governed”. His is an alien philosophy to these shores. Rudy Giuliani gets this but does not know exactly how to express it.
For us here it became clear that Obama’s sympathies lie with America’s enemies and Muslim extremists:
We cannot believe the Obama non-reaction to the Morsi power grab in Egypt is boobery. It is historic treachery.
Barack Obama has not demanded Morsi resign. A power grab by Morsi and the Muslim Brotherhood and Obama is effectively silent. Obama demanded the resignation of Hosni Mubarak when pawns took to the streets to demand “freedom” but now Obama is slient. No calls for resignation. [snip]
But for some reason Barack Obama is not siding with the “Egyptian people” now that the Arab Spring is slowly turning to nuclear winter. [snip]
Why won’t Barack Obama demand Morsi resign? Egyptian demonstrations? Check. Violence in the streets? Check. Government officials resigning in protest? Check. Egyptian government institutions such as the military and judiciary threatened? Check. Why won’t Obama demand that Morsi resign?
The only difference between Mubarak and Morsi we see is that Morsi is an Islamic extremist. Why won’t Barack Obama demand Morsi resign?
Think we’re nuts? Why then is Obama still antagonistic towards Egypt even though Egypt is in the forefront in the battle against ISIS? Egypt is on the side of America against ISIS but Obama is against Egypt (and of course against Israel too):
U.S. Won’t Back Egypt’s Attacks on ISIS
Two longtime allies are attacking ISIS—and growing frustrated with one another. That’s good news for the so-called Islamic State.
The Obama administration was given multiple chances Wednesday to endorse a longtime ally’s airstrikes on America’s biggest enemy at the moment, the so-called Islamic State. Over and over again, Obama’s aides declined to back Egypt’s military operation against ISIS. It’s another sign of the growing strain between the United States and Egypt, once one of its closest friends in the Middle East.
This shouldn’t be a complete surprise; Cairo, after all, didn’t tell Washington about its strikes on the ISIS hotbed of Derna, Libya. Still, Wednesday’s disconnect was jarring.
Why is it that every time Obama has to side against Muslim extremists Obama finds a way to help Muslim extremists? But, argue Obama defenders, Obama is killing a lot of Muslim extremists. That’s true but what is needed is the capture and interrogation of Muslim extremists. In a very real sense Obama’s killing of Muslim extremists protects the infrastructure of Muslim extremist organizations.
Obama refuses to attend a march in Paris to protest Muslim killers and in support of the (classic) liberal values of freedom of expression and religion. Obama refuses to give weapons to Egypt which prevents Egypt from joining a coalition against ISIS and when Egypt attacks ISIS Obama is petulant.
Maybe Obama is angry with Egypt because the Egyptian president is respected by us for his speech on January 1? But why the anti-Jordan Obama policy? Obama won’t help Jordan attack Muslim extremists either.
Rudy Giuliani was too tepid in his analysis of treacherous Barack Obama. Obama didn’t even invite the Director of the FBI to this week’s publicity stunt to take attention away from Muslim extremists and try to distribute like Obamaphones blame for killings and violence to anyone other than Obama’s objects of affection.
Maybe FBI Director Comey was not invited to the White House because Comey talks about the danger ISIS poses to the United States.
In 2008 we were assured that one of Barack Obama’s great qualifications arose from his young life amongst the Muslims. We don’t know if fat young Barry “went native” and absorbed ugly anti-Western hate while in Indonesia. It is more likely that Obama’s twisted personal life led him to a pew in a church that on a Sunday immediately after the 2001 Muslim attacks against the World Trade Center three words resounded from the rafters “God Damn America.”
The church was ostensibly “Christian” but the words were decidedly Muslim extremist.
Barack Obama won’t say Muslim extremists are responsible for the many killings in the world today.
Obama won’t say “Islamic extremists” or “Muslim extremists” because Obama doesn’t see them as “extremists”. Obama thinks Muslims have “legitimate grievances” – even as Christian heads roll and Jews flee to the promised land.