Update: Others are saying pretty much what we wrote below. Hop off the Clenis:
David Bossie, former chief investigator for the House Oversight Committee during the Clinton administration, told Megyn Kelly he wished had spent more time investigating then-first lady Hillary Clinton. “We got off track from our investigations with all of the sex stuff,” said Bossie, now the head of the conservative group Citizen United.
Stick to the issues not the Clenis.
As to the “wackadoodle dentist” he wants attention and he must be upset Bill Clinton is set to campaign against McConnell in Kentucky, but as we wrote below, the deficits of Clenis envy are beginning to harden. After Bossie today it is Karl Rove: Why is Rand Paul beating up on Bill Clinton for old sins? Again, as we wrote below, short term this gets Rand Paul attention and maybe some love from E/I Republicans/conservatives but it does make Republicans look like Ken Starr-like panty sniffers. Rove is talking about the Republican brand as fuddy-duddy tut-tutting pearl clutchers:
“Frankly, Rand Paul spending a lot of time talking about the mistakes of Bill Clinton does not look like a big agenda for the future of the country,” Rove said on Fox’s “America’s Newsroom.”
To counter the “war on women” strategy Republicans should focus on women getting paid less than men in the Barack Obama White House of horror and forego the temptations of below the belt Clenis attacks.
Kudos to Matt Drudge of DrudgeReport. His headline today: PAPERS SHOW ‘RUTHLESS’ HILLARY. We’ve been beating up on Hillary Clinton 2016 quite a bit lately in order to get them to shape up and it has not been pretty. Hillary Clinton 2016 is a muddled message mess and there is no useful purpose to an eyes tight shut, mouth shut tighter strategy. But today, thanks to the Hillary addicted Matt, Hillary Clinton and Hillary Clinton 2016 got a much needed break.
“Hillary papers” show ruthless, ambitious First Lady is the headline from events thirteen or fourteen years ago. But hey, we’ll take it. “Ruthless” is in the eye of the beholder. Is a Mama Grizzly “ruthless”? Hey, we’ll take “ruthless” over slothful any day. One would think that there is news of more recent vintage to fight 2016 over. Any ideas? Here we go: White House delays ObamaCare employer mandate for some small businesses until 2016. Looks to us like passive/aggressive lawbreaking is more current news than “ruthless” talk but we’ll take “ruthless” without any ruth at all.
After 500 years, with the abyss of 300 more years staring at us, of driftwood Barack Obama at the helm the country is more than ready for leadership and kickass motivation. Watching “ruthless” Vladimir Putin out-think and out-strategize flabby man-child Barack has been painful for the entire nation and the world. Putin got what he wanted on Syria and even managed to finagle the Olympics. Obama drew a red line on Syria which quickly betrayed his yellow streak and could not, even at the height of his popularity and power in 2009, get the Olympics to Chicago. The nation is ready for a little “ruthless” along with direction, a coherent world-view, and ovarian fortitude.
Some experienced “ruthless” could help the nation. Iran will know not to mess with “obliteration” and the hired hands will if necessary be sent to the basement cages when they screw up. When Hillary was in the White House she knew to smash faces that needed smashing and to break fingers that needed breaking. Barack Obama thought if he hired the same hired hands that Hillary kept on a leash his White House would at least run smoothly while he vacationed. But as we wrote it didn’t work out that way:
“Rahm really hated Hillary. She’s the one that used to call him names because of that ballet thing of his and him thinking he was so tough. Hillary smacked him down. Hell, she even had him demoted and the guy lost his office and had to work from a cubicle in the White House basement. Damn, that boy really hates Hillary. Hillary kept the leash on that boy and kept him in line.
I made a mistake with Rahm. I fell for his tough boy act and I fell for the idea that he was the one that knew how Washington worked so I wouldn’t have to do any work. That was a bi-iii-ggg mistake. Rahm talks tough but it’s a bull in a China shop. All you wind up with is damage and a big bill to pay. That Bi#ch Hillary and her sicko friends didn’t warn me about Rahm.
I should have kept a leash on that Bi#ch Rahm but supervising him would have been a lot of work. But it’s too late now.”
It’s too late now to grow a pair of testicles and exercise some testicular fortitude. It’s also too late to get “ruthless”. Whining, race-baiting, petulant foot stomps, to get what you want for your personal advancement and comfort are not the same as “ruthless” pursuit of goals to help the nation. Kudos to Hillary addict Matt Drudge for giving “ruthless” a name to vote for.
Last week, two of what William S. Burroughs called Junkies made headlines much bigger than the Hillary headline at DrudgeReport of today. Junkie #1 was a short, fat, talented Hollywood actor found dead in a $10,000 a month apartment with a needle in his arm. He turned blue and birthed a bundle of stories about tortured artists and the heroin pushers who love them.
Junkie #2, well, Junkie #2 was another godsend warning for Hillary Clinton 2016 about Big Media. Junkie #2 was Tom Sizemore and this heroin addict was caught on tape alleging that Bill Clinton and an actress cavorted in an extra-marital affair. It was Big Media fun while it lasted:
“As Hillary Clinton prepares to run for President in 2016, RadarOnline.com has uncovered bombshell new information that could torpedo her White House dreams: The philandering husband of the former United States Secretary of State, ex-President Bill Clinton, carried on a torrid year-long love affair with British supermodel Elizabeth Hurley behind White House walls.
That’s the explosive revelation dropped by the man who says he arranged the secret tryst, actor Tom Sizemore.
In a blockbuster exclusive, Radar has unearthed a secret audio recording during which the Hollywood actor, who had his own three-year sexual liaison with Hurley, recounts how the famously-frisky ex-President once sent a plane to fly Hurley to Washington D.C., where he bedded her in the White House — while First Lady Hillary was in the very next room!
On the tape, recorded in January of this year and provided to Radar and GLOBE in a joint investigation, 52-year-old Sizemore boasts to two pals about how he arranged the pair’s first rendezvous.”
The fun for the entertainment starved unfortunately did not last. Not that it should have begun. The alleged Bill Clinton drooling was more Ed Wood sci-fi porn dialog than anything resembling how humans communicate. That was the first sure clue.
That Sizemore (what a name for a Clenis worshiper!) had never been to the White House was another clue. But the Clinton penis (the Clenis), like heroin, is a hard substance to go cold turkey on. Sadly, no matter how much the story was massaged or inflated it eventually went limp:
“Troubled actor Tom Sizemore has reached a new low: In an embarrassing about-face, the drug-addicted Hollywood star now claims he made up the story of Elizabeth Hurley and Bill Clinton‘s love affair during a drug binge. [snip]
“I was never at the White House and I never met Bill Clinton. I went to a screening of Black Hawk Down but it wasn’t in the White House. It was in a theater near the White House. But I’ve never been to the White House and met our president, any president.” [snip]
Thus do heroin junkies prematurely hijack the Big Media news junkies into dark alleys of misinformation and delusion. It doesn’t take much, just the all powerful Clenis, and all sense is thrown out the window. The “wackadoodle mad dentist with the two heads” is addicted to the Clenis too. Inquiring minds want to know why the wackadoodle mad dentist is constantly mouthing off on the Clenis:
“Rand Paul keeps attacking Bill Clinton. Why?
What gives? We put that question to a handful of Republican strategists — both those in the Paul orbit and those outside of it. Here’s the responses we got to explain Paul’s repeated hits on Clinton.
1. It revs up the base. [snip]
2. It’s a way to get at Hillary. [snip]
3. It’s who Rand is. [snip]
4. It’s personal. [snip]
Mouthing off on the Clenis helps Rand Paul to a certain limited extent. Some think it helps with the “War On Women” Republican counterattack but we don’t think refighting lost battles on the same terrain with the same armies bodes well for a different outcome. Clenis talk undoubtedly titilates E/I (emotion over intelligence) Republicans/conservatives so it personally helps Rand Paul and keeps his name out there. It’s a smart strategy and personally profits Rand Paul. But those profits can easily turn to deficits.
Rand Paul spitting on the Clenis might bring back talk about Buddha Boy, er, Aqua Buddha Boy. A tied up woman at a fraternity party forced to worship Aqua Buddha might seem like old news but 2016 won’t be as easy as 2010 for wackadoodle dentists. And if fourteen year old activities make for headlines today why can’t we go back to college for our 2016 news? See the problem Aqua Boy?
Also a danger when trash talking the Clenis is that other men in public office, especially Republican men with um, histories, might get caught up in the vortex of suckitude. Senator David Vitter running for governor is one Republican that knows what we mean. For years Republicans have started off pumping up the Clenis story for their benefit only to find that at the end of the day they have just been f*cked again by the mighty Clenis.