It’s Barack Obama In Crisis, Not America

Update II: Check out our new hashtag #JohnKerryBotox. We wrote an article months ago about #JohnKerryBotox that got a lot of attention today after Kerry appeared on TV (see, Open thread: Sunday morning talking heads; Update: Kerry making the full Ginsburg) and displayed his freakish appearance. A woman (Hillary or Palin for instance) with that much botox would be nonstop breaking news. StrayYellaDog made us giggle with this: “@HillaryIs44 I remember when Barack was the “anti-war” candy date. And Hillary was the warmonger.” We like “candy date” as substitute for candidate Obama.

As for Syria, what we wrote in the update below is so on target we can now add some developing evidence. Vodka for victorious and strong Putin: Analysis: Putin sees chance to turn tables on Obama at G20″. Champagne for Syria: “President Obama has announced yesterday, by prevaricating or hinting, the start of the historic American retreat.” Exponential weakness from flaccid Weak Obama. Those that support Obama foolishness on Syria by applauding his forced going to congress (even though we are told Obama might still attack if the vote goes against him) or even an attack on sideshow Syria are wrong. Wrong. Syria might be the straw that breaks the camel’s back and leads to Obama impeachment. It’s also a way to break Obama on ObamaCare and “immigration reform” and all his other treacherous flights of fancy. Hey Republicans/conservatives, read the introductory paragraphs of our main article (below) to read what you should say.


Update: Weak Obama has been forced to go to congress for authorization for an attack on Syria. Breaking: Obama says he will seek Congressional authorization for strikes. At his “press statement” today Obama tried to appear tough in demeanor but the central message is weakness multiplied. Big Media will applaud and protect Obama but world leaders and the sensible will see weakness tied to stupidity married to treachery.

First, Barack has been forced to go to Congress for an authorization vote. Congress returns on September 9. From ‘this is an immediate threat’ to ‘fiddle de de I’ll do it tomorrow’. Obama began this crawl by stating that the military is ready now or “a month from now” to strike Syria. Of course American military readiness has not been a point of contention. We know our servicewomen and men are ready. It’s Barack Obama that is not ready. The Obama “red line” is a “yellow streak” and maybe he wants congress to get him off the hook.

Second, Obama has thrown a lot of supporters under the bus. John “we must strike now” Kerry has been carpet bombed by Barack. The Syria strike is now a major political hot potato for Republicans and Obama Dimocrats. What Obama Dimocrats – you know the ones deranged by the Hillary vote for authorization of force in Iraq – will do is now a cause for Santa Clause style giggling belly mirth. All those Obama Dimocrats now have to become war-mongers like Obama in order to support the Nobel Peace Prize winner that rode an authorization for use of force in Iraq to career advancement. No doubt Obama Dimocrats will attempt to cloak this as an anti-WMD highfalutin moral crusade. Well played Dick Cheney, well played. And Bill Clinton… kudos. When Bill Clinton called Obama a “fool” a “total fool” a “total wuss” he was right on target.

Republicans too now have to put up or shut up. What will Republicans running for reelection do? What will Obama supporter Lindsay Graham do? Will Lindsay vote for a flaccid “strike” on Syria knowing it is so weak it will do nothing but give Syria survivor bragging rights? Good luck on that primary Lindsay. Good luck on that primary McConnell. The Big Question: Will Republicans vote to help Barack Obama and provide the votes for authorization and thereby cover for Obama Dimocrats that in their heart of hearts don’t want to be seen as “baby killers”. Or will Republicans take the wiser course we suggest below which Sarah Palin so sharply summarizes as: “Let Allah sort it out” a.k.a. let them (Muslim Brotherhood Syria) kill themselves (murderous government thug Assad). As in the Iran-Iraq war American policy should be to have both sides lose.

Third, the headline is “Syria Wins“. Champagne in Damascus tonight. Derisive laughter from strong leader Putin in Moscow as the vodka flows in celebration of victory. Putin will be hosting Obama next week and we would not be surprised if Putin pisses in a cup and forces Obama to drink – either from the cup or the “faucet”. The “rebel” groups and Jordan will be drinking hemlock. In Israel, more proof if any was needed that Obama is a boob and they will have to defend themselves if Israel is to survive. “Never Again!” Get ready to strike at Iran Israel because Obama will get you killed.

Fourth, this “debate” is going to take up a lot of ink and time. September was supposed to be about ObamaCare but now it is going to be a trip down Memory Lane as we relive the Iraq War debate. The young Obama Hopium Guzzlers and the older Obama Hopium Guzzlers now have to decide if they want to defend Obama’s deadly ObamaCare or Obama’s Latest War.


What should Republicans do about Syria and war monger Barack Obama? We’ll do all the work for them and write exactly what they should each and every one say (minus the kookoo birds like Lindsay Graham). Here is the statement every Republican should, in an organized, coordinated, well publicized manner, read from the Capitol steps or on every TV show they can get on:

The President does not have power under the Constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation.

As Commander-in-Chief, the President does have a duty to protect and defend the United States. In instances of self-defense, the President would be within his constitutional authority to act before advising Congress or seeking its consent.”

Then add:

The president has no authority to unilaterally attack Iran Syria, and if he does, as Foreign Relations Committee chairman a member of Congress, I will move to impeach.”

Use Barack Obama’s exact words and the exact words of Joey Biden. Watch the DailyKooks and the nothing Left debase themselves even more in service of Obama.

If there was any integrity left in them we would suggest the Obama Hopium Guzzlers in congress read the exact same statement on TV but there is no integrity left in the left. As to Republicans, unfortunately Keith Koffler reminds us all, the Congress will remain supine because they are on vacation and nothing is more important to these loafers than vacations.

Even though 80% of Americans, in an NBC(!) poll want congressional approval before attacking Syria that is not going to happen. The Republicans, even with 80% of the public on their side, are refusing to act with unity and strength. This is the party that says it will take Barack Obama on and defund ObamaCare? If they won’t fight with these poll numbers….

Republicans could even quote Barack Obama on the question of going solo and attacking unilaterally:

It is Barack Obama that has lost legitimacy. The “man” that attacked George W. Bush for acting like a cowboy and not acquiring universal consent before attacking Iraq – even though George W. Bush did go to congress and the United Nations – now intends to attack Syria unilaterally.

The contradictions and hypocrisy are at such a level that the horse had to whinny today. Kerry: The UN can’t do anything, so we’ll go it alone

“Golly, that sounds a lot like … what George W. Bush said in 2002-3, too. And when Bush said it, he put together a coalition comprised of dozens of nations for the invasion of Iraq, including large numbers of British troops and no small amount from other European nations, even with Russia, China, and France balking. Barack Obama can’t even get the British to come along on long-range air strikes, and the only other partner we seem to have now is France. And unlike Barack Obama and Kerry, Bush did go to the UN to at least force a vote on ending Saddam Hussein’s depredations, which included using chemical weapons to massacre his own people.”

We’re still laughing about the Bush-like Obama hunt for WMD. But in-between our guffaws we ponder the ugliness of chemical warfare.

* * * * * *

Chemical warfare is not a nice way to die. But then again, what is? The French, ever gallant, invented the Guillotine as a more merciful way to die from state sponsored death. The Guillotine is a long way from disembowelment and that rather painful get-pulled-apart-by-horses execution method. Chemical warfare, used extensively in the most horrific war ever, is generally considered outmoded for two reasons.

The first problem with chemical weapons is the potential for the wind to change and other mishaps. The second problem is that if one side uses this grisly form of violence, it is fairly easy for the other side to reciprocate. Not only is the death particularly horrid, the medical costs are high. A pleasant war can get very gruesome very quickly.

After the unpleasantness of World War I it was generally observed by all sides during the subsequent conflagration to forgo chemical weaponry. But in order to forgo chemical warfare it has to be accepted by all sides that use by one means use by all.

The United States was supposed to get rid of all its chemical warfare weapons by 2012 but, as with ObamaCare, the deadlines have been missed. Why did the United States agree to this disarmament? Apparently we regard any chemical attack as a nuclear attack and will retaliate accordingly.

Less white glove than the good ol’ USA some countries use chemical weapons with regularity. Sometimes, when we have a president that is not 100% boob, we take advantage of the situation. Shocked?

Yes, sometimes we applaud the use of chemical weapons. Sometimes, when we have an American president who cares more about the country than his “brand” or a smart president who has a worldview and sees the bigger picture, a president who puts his duty to country above duty to polish his celebrity credentials, we wind up applauding chemical warfare.

Consider the Iran-Iraq War:

“The Iran–Iraq War began when Iraq invaded Iran via air and land on 22 September 1980. It followed a long history of border disputes, and was motivated by fears that the Iranian Revolution in 1979 would inspire insurgency among Iraq’s long-suppressed Shia majority as well as Iraq’s desire to replace Iran as the dominant Persian Gulf state. [snip]

The conflict has been compared to World War I in terms of the tactics used, including large-scale trench warfare with barbed wire stretched across trenches, manned machine-gun posts, bayonet charges, human wave attacks across a no-man’s land, and extensive use of chemical weapons such as mustard gas by the Iraqi government against Iranian troops, civilians, and Iraqi Kurds. At the time of the conflict, the U.N. Security Council issued statements that “chemical weapons had been used in the war,” and U.S. intelligence officials both knew of Iraqi chemical weapons use and provided Iraq with satellite imagery to guide strikes against Iranian troop concentrations. U.N. statements never clarified that only Iraq was using chemical weapons, and according to retrospective authors “the international community remained silent as Iraq used weapons of mass destruction against Iranian[s] as well as Iraqi Kurds.”

Iran and Iraq had grievances against each other. Both tried to overthrow the other’s government. Both Iran and Iraq were horrid hellholes intent on causing damage to the entire region. There were no good guys in the conflict. American policy was to have both side lose.

That may appear monstrous at first glance. But as with Syria now there were no “good” people to cheer in the conflict. American policy was based on what was in America’s interests.

When Americans elect a president it is so that the president makes the hard decisions. It’s not to make a person a celebrity who cares more about himself than the nation. In the Iran-Iraq War self-interest drove the policy. The president is hired to make the decisions that benefit the country and its interests. Whether it is to drop a nuclear bomb on cities, order carpet bombing, air strikes or whatever, policy should be guided by the nation’s interests not the celebrity status or “comfort zone” of the president.

What was in America’s interests? Both Iran and Iraq were a menace to the region and to American interests and therefore American policy was to get both sides to lose. The United States propped up each regime as it was about to falter. The United States sold weapons to both sides. It was a brutal piece of realpolitik that can be debated but during the 1980s the American president unquestionably was on the side of American interests.

What we have now is a president in crisis because he is not qualified to be president.

Why is Barack Obama in crisis? Obama is in crisis because he was so desperate to win reelection that he boobed it up without a TelePrompTer:

“While Obama has long spoken out against Bashar al-Assad and the use of chemical weapons, it was the president’s apparent off-the-cuff comments one year ago that may now be most responsible for putting the U.S. in a bind.

Obama’s warning in August 2012 that use of a “whole bunch” of chemical weapons would cross a “red line,” triggering “enormous consequences,” went much further than aides had planned, several told the New York Times earlier this year. Some reportedly wished Obama could have taken those words back.

Now, the Nobel Peace Prize laureate, who has made ending the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan his signature foreign policy achievement, is at risk of entangling the U.S. in a fresh Middle East conflict.

Perhaps equally troubling to Obama is the prospect of acting without a robust international coalition. He twice campaigned on a vow to restore an American policy of multilateralism and hailed the 2011 NATO intervention in Libya as a new model for coordinated military action. [snip]

Now, the loss of British backing of a strike against Syria is a significant blow to Obama’s vision, setting up two undesirable options: not keeping his word on “enormous consequences” for crossing that “red line,” or going it relatively alone.

What a boob! It’s the ad-libbed war. And this is the guy that was sold as a brilliant communicator.

* * * * * *

Barack Obama is not qualified to be president. We’ve discussed why before. In brief, Barack Obama is not qualified to be President because he does not have a world-view which is congruent with reality.”

[N.B. For the purposes of our discussion we are generous and arguendo assume that Barack Obama is acting in what he perceives to be the best interests of the United States and is not, as the pattern of his actions logically suggest (witness Obama’s unyielding support for Muslim Bro/thug Morsi contrasted to his knee jerk attack on reliable U.S. clients such as Mubarak and ally Israel. And why oh why is Barack Obama helping the Muslim Brotherhood in Syria take power and helping the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt regain power?), more Muslim Brotherhood than P.O.T.U.S.]

Barack Obama is also weak. The “man” has daddy issues. Sperm donor dad dumped Obama and only tolerated the ten year old’s presence for all of 10 minutes. Mommy meanwhile was a flower spreading her petals anxious to be pollinated repeatedly by third world men. Mommy Obama dumped big eared fat boy Obama on the grandma and grandpa (Obama later denounced his grandma as a “racist” because granny once expressed fear that black men at the bus stop she took to work threatened her) so she could pursue uninterrupted her botanical imitations.

These daddy issues led Barack to become an insecure back-slapping flim-flam man dedicated solely to his advancement. Filled with the complementary narcissism and self-loathing which so often accompany each other, Barack Obama advanced but always with that deep knowledge that he is a piece of sh*t unloved by the sperm donor (we do not refer to Larry Sinclair her but rather to the black economist thrown out of Harvard for donating too much sperm to too many women) and rejected by the flower that put the Pacific Ocean between herself and her spawn.

The talented Mr. Obama has been a very successful flim-flam man. Obama has fooled a lot of the people a lot of the time. But a flim-flam artist has to know his own limitations. It’s one thing to impersonate a surgeon at cocktail parties and an entirely different bloody job if forced into the operation theater. That’s where Barack Obama now finds himself – in crisis.

It’s not the United States that is in crisis. America will survive this buffoon and thrive once Obama and his hoodlums are sent packing. It is Barack Obama that is in crisis.

World leaders have known for a long time that Barack Obama is a hapless boob. Back in early 2009 while Obama vacationed in Europe we wrote:

The BOob is a pushover – that is the message from Barack Obama’s European vacation. The news from Asia is not much better as North Korea sizes up Obama and sees a dwarf.

World leaders sized up Obama and decided he is a celebrity wannabee. So world leaders gave Obama the soul craving celebrity he wants for himself and then smartly picked the pockets of Uncle Sam while Obama grinned.

This is all in keeping with the Obama history of self-agrandizement and doing nothing, zero, for anyone else. During the European Vacation Obama backslapped as if he was back at Harvard University bamboozling conservatives and liberals in order to advance himself. During the European Vacation Obama grinned and laughed and cameras popped but Americans were about as comforted as Obama’s freezing Chicago constituents. During the European Vacation Obama insulted America in order to make himself more popular.

World leaders took a page from Madame Mao, the “White-boned Demon” and flattered and built up Obama on a pedestal so high Obama became irrelevant.

Social power and popularity can be potent weapons if you are Louis XIV of France, the “Sun King”. But Obama’s yearning for celebrity, social power, and popularity are to fill a void in his fatherless self not to help America nor Americans.

Big Media won’t say Obama was made a fool of and mocked by real world leaders. Big Media prefers to focus on the sleeveless scowler and praise her clumsy protocol pratfalls.

World leaders saw Obama, shuttered their eyelids, smiled, and whispered “Sucker”.

World leaders kept quiet about their contempt for Barack Obama because it profited them. Now the contempt is open and near universal. The United Kingdom, America’s staunchest ally yesterday slapped Obama so hard the sonic boom crossed the Atlantic to shake the botox on John Kerry’s face.

The 11 year old son of Hafez Assad has even taken to FaceBook to mock Barack. The eleven year old who lives with his daddy, is double daring Barack to do something. ‘We laugh at you Barack’ says the Syrian tyke. The little Syrian boy who lives with his dad is not afraid because Barack has already stated and restated that his actions won’t amount to much other than sending a telegram via Navy ship not Western Union.

American national interests are not served by putting the Muslim Brotherhood in power in Syria and restoring the Muslim Brotherhood to power or even as a legitimate political force in Egypt. American interests are best served by removing the Muslim Brotherhood and like minded organizations from power. American interests are best served by an Egypt that stomps out Muslim extremists and stripping Iran of power and any audacious dream of nuclear weapons.

Syria is a sideshow – chemical weapons or not. Keep eyes and arms focused on Iran. Defend Israel. That’s what Americans should care about.

As to an attack on Syria, that’s incompetent war monger Barack Obama’s ugly baby. It’s another ugly baby, but it is all yours daddy Barack.


The Great Return: Hillary Clinton 2016 And More Laughs And Tears From Obama The Clown

A summer of a rodeo clown dominating headlines brings forth new laughs. King Clown Obama, the chucklehead of all chuckleheads, has us in full chuckle.

Oprah’s penis dress provoked laughs from us but not as much as the thought of Barack Obama in a Bush-like search for weapons of mass destruction – in Syria. We have no doubt that the Syrian Government is bathing rebel forces with weaponized chemicals and gasses but the irony of Obama as Bush and the neo-con hunt for WMDs can’t help but make us giggle. Are we back to 2008?

As funny as Obama on the hunt for weapons of mass destruction is, what intrigues us the most is the appalling fact that on Wednesday Obama will be oppressing with another tedious speech the 50th anniversary of the March on Washington even as cruise missiles are readied for launch. Forget “Let Freedom Ring” lets sing “Let Hypocrisy Reign”.

Anti-war Peace Prize winner Martin Luther King would be so proud. A few hours after soiling the 50th anniversary show, Obama will earn another peace prize by doing something to prove he is manly. Obama will drop some flaccid missiles on Syria all the while apologizing. The Obama Hopium Guzzlers will applaud.

Not all the Hopium Guzzlers are applauding however. At the New Republic, stronghold of Obama delusionists, there is some realization that Obama is, at best, a boob:

“As president, starting with his Prague speech in 2009, he has often said one of his top goals was preventing the spread of weapons of mass destruction.

But there seems no way Obama can justify, either to himself or anyone else, a commitment to banning nuclear weapons but a laissez-faire approach to chemical weapons, which are now being used in warfare for the first time in a quarter-century. The drive to ban chemical weapons was fuelled by the horrors of World War I, the anti-nuclear movement by the horrors of World War II. Opposing WMD means banning both. A failure to respond to the use in Syria now wouldn’t be just a failure to make progress; it would be a major retrogression. [snip]

As for his “pivot” towards Asia, all of Obama’s speeches meant to reassure our Asian allies of our continuing and revived interest the region would end up having little impact if our policies in Syrian make it appear as the United States is so wavering that America’s idealism and its power are both on the wane.

Worst of all is the way in which Obama’s recent policies of fervent restraint undermine his administration’s past assertions about America’s role in the world. Over the past few years, as Obama’s fringe critics have accused him of wanting or seeking decline, the president and his aides have come up with bland but plausible formulations to defend their policies. We’re not trying to bring about America’s decline in the world, they argue; rather, we’re trying to do what’s necessary to preserve American role in the world for another 50 years or so.

But it is hard to square that belief with Obama’s policy of fervent restraint in Syria and Egypt. Indeed, the only power Obama seems to be asserting these days is an ironic one: it is an assertive belief in the presidential prerogative to be passive. The existing federal law says if there is a military coup d’etat against a democratic government, then American foreign aid will be cut off. All the arguments against cutting off aid—we will lose influence with the Egyptian generals, etc., etc.—are more-or-less debatable arguments, but ones that Obama should make to Congress to try to get the law changed. To ignore the law is to increase presidential power (just as the right to declare war years ago slipped quietly from Congress to the president.)

Overall, Obama has seemed recently as if he is morphing before our eyes from someone who believes, rightly, that the United States can’t always influence world events as much we would like, to someone who believes we shouldn’t exert influence, and shouldn’t even try. Even he must see now that his policy of fervent restraint has reached the end of its usefulness.

The “fringe critics” like us correctly and with precision analyzed weak Obama and his failures domestically and internationally. Now all is falling apart and Obama’s center cannot hold. The failures are attributable either to a deliberate undermining of America or sheer boobery. If it is boobery, it is showing. The hypocrisies and bumbling can no longer be kept from public view.

On Syria, which frankly does not matter as much as Egypt, it has been all out boobery all the time for Syrian Antoin “Tony” Rezko’s crime pal Barack. Whatever Barack does in Syria will be a mess because a boob can only beget boobery. There is time to consult with wiser leaders but King Clown Obama is at his rodeo too busy blustering and making a fool of himself to listen to the American people or wiser leaders. Will Obama go to Congress before attacking Syria? Don’t expect the Hopium Guzzlers to demand that from the “unitary executive” they so thrashed in 2008. Are we in 2008?

Remember in 2008 how the Obama Hopium Guzzlers trashed Hillary Clinton as a belligerent war monger? Now the monger is on the other war – Obama’s war. It would be so much fun if Hillary or somebody would denounce Obama as a war monger and say it is time for a change.

And speaking of Hillary, she is back. For those that hate Hillary and for those that love Hillary the news is great, just great. Everyone should at least enjoy the coming fight we have been writing about for so long. The coming bloodbath at the DNC is something we will love to witness and certainly Republicans should get the popcorn and watch the great return:

“But when Harold M. Ickes walked into the Rules and Bylaws Committee meeting on Thursday afternoon and rejoined the panel, at least one longtime Democratic strategist raised her eyebrows.

“He predated the Clinton era, but when I saw Harold reappointed to the D.N.C., he surely, in my judgment, symbolizes the return of the Clintons,” said Donna Brazile, a fellow member of the rules committee.”

That reservoir of fear and loathing, that bottomless pit of filth called Donna Brazile, sees the writing on the wall and thinks we have forgotten her treacheries and lies as she tries to ingratiate herself to Hillary & Co. We haven’t forgotten Donna. We remember.

We remember and no doubt Harold Ickes remembers:

“Mr. Ickes said he was put back on the committee by Debbie Wasserman Schultz, chairwoman of the national committee and herself an ardent advocate for Mrs. Clinton in 2008, but he also acknowledged that he “actively sought” the seat.

It is in my view the most important committee at the D.N.C. because of its role in shaping the nomination process,” he said, adding a bit mischievously, “The goal is to design rules to nominate the strongest candidate for the general election.”

That, he added, would be up to the voters but there is no question who he believes that candidate is.

Mr. Ickes, 73, is a fixture in the Clinton’s world. He ran Bill Clinton’s New York campaign in the 1992 Democratic primary and served as a deputy chief of staff in Mr. Clinton’s White House. He was a top adviser to Hillary Clinton’s 2008 campaign, and Mrs. Clinton’s chief liaison at the D.N.C. during her primary battle against Barack Obama. From his perch on the rules committee he memorably railed against a compromise on disputed delegates in the waning days of the Democratic primary.

At a notably less sedate national committee meeting in late May 2008, Mr. Ickes argued in vain against what he called the “hijacking” of Mrs. Clinton’s delegate share from two disputed state primaries. “I am stunned that we have the gall and the chutzpah to substitute our judgment for 600,000 voters,” Mr. Ickes said at the time.

A few weeks later, Mrs. Clinton conceded the race to Mr. Obama. The following year, with Mr. Obama as party leader, Mr. Ickes left his rules committee post. According to party records, he had served on the rules panel since at least 1992.

I was not reappointed after the 2008 election for some pretty obvious reasons,” Mr. Ickes said.

Now, five years later — with Mr. Obama a lame duck and speculation soaring about whether Mrs. Clinton will seek the White House again — her procedural maven is back in his old position at the national party.”

The party has to be purged of Barack Obama and his hoodlums. Ickes, the man with one kidney lost in the civil rights era struggles , is on the job and hopefully a lot wiser about the Chicago filth. Ickes has not forgotten why he was not reappointed and that should end all the Big Media nonsense about the Obama versus Clinton wars being buried.

Harold Ickes is not the only one that better be aware of the dangers ahead for Hillary Clinton 2016. A lot of fools affiliated with Hillary Clinton 2016 do not realize Obama will do anything and everything to stop Hillary from getting the nomination. Barack Obama organized his OAF organization to make sure he keeps control of the Dimocratic Party. Barack Obama will do what he has to do to stop Hillary and Harold from taking power and control away from him.

Hillary Clinton 2016 supporters who think Obama “owes” Bill and Hillary and that a “deal” was made in 2012 to reelect Barack Obama are fools – if they think Obama will pay up and not welsh on the deal. Remember:

“Obama simply cannot be trusted. Obama cannot be trusted on any issue. Obama cannot be trusted by his friends. Obama cannot be trusted by his enemies. Obama cannot be trusted.”

Barack Obama is auditioning stooges for the role of the anti-Hillary 2016:

“His Republican foes branded it the “2016 Kickoff Tour” and vice-president Joe Biden made it clear to the people of “my native town, Scranton” that he hopes to build a White House campaign on tales of his humble upbringing in Pennsylvania coal country.

After recently seeming to bolster former secretary of state Hillary Clinton’s credentials to be his successor, President Barack Obama went out of his way to give a boost to his No 2. [snip]

This was a signal that [Obama’s] not playing sides,” said Ed Mitchell, a long-time Democratic consultant in Pennsylvania.

He wanted to be there together with Biden so that people didn’t think that because he’d had lunch with Secretary Clinton and said nice things about her on 60 Minutes that he was favouring her.”

Obama said at Friday’s rally to promote an initiative to make college more affordable that the “reason that I love Scranton is because if it weren’t for Scranton, I wouldn’t have Joe Biden”.

Noting that it was exactly five years since the “special day” that he selected Biden as his running mate, Obama piled on the praise. “It was the best decision that I ever made, politically, because I love this guy . . . and he’s got some Scranton in him,” he said.

Biden grinned broadly, perhaps imagining the campaign commercial that could be crafted from the event.”

Did someone say “clown”?:

“In his book This Town, a dirt-dishing account of the insider world of politics that has become a summer must-read in the American capital, Mark Leibovich describes Biden as “the lovable rodeo clown of the administration”, someone Obama talked about “with a patronising over-fondness — as if the VP were the beloved family dog that kept peeing on the carpet”.

Biden’s two previous runs for the White House were spectacular failures. In 2008, his folksy, long-winded style failed to resonate and he dropped out after securing just 0.9% of the vote in Iowa.

In 1987 he was forced to withdraw when it was revealed that he had plagiarised a speech by Neil Kinnock, then Labour party leader. [snip]

A Biden presidential campaign will be like watching Benny Hill reruns,” he said. “Our Joey will be predictable — he’ll be as stale as a day-old sausage roll and cheeky in his own goofy way.”

Joe Biden is only one of the many Obama will audition for the anti-Hillary of 2016. Behind the scenes it will be just like 2008 when many Hillary Clinton supporters did not realize that Rahm Emanuel, Ted Kennedy, John Kerry, Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi and Hillary’s good friend Patti Solis Doyle were secretly working for Barack Obama well before 2007.

Biden is not the end product but he is a stalking horse for the dark horse yet to arrive. Biden doesn’t stand a chance against Hillary. Obama is using dumb ol’ Joe to buy some time until the real anti-Hillary can be found or revealed.

We’ve never thought much about Biden but, a “rodeo clown of the administration”? The “dog that kept peeing on the carpet”? Isn’t that Barack? Isn’t that why things stink? It’s time we all work hard to get this clown and all his works out of the White House and back to Chicago.


Stop The Big Media Hillary Clinton Biographies – Or, How Stupid Is The GOP?

Update: Think we don’t know what we are talking about? You got the information you needed from us – well before today. What’s the news you ask? Sources: NBC worried about retaliation from Clintons over Hillary miniseries. Forget about that NBC/MSNBC crap. They can go straight to the place Tim Russert is at. The news is Hillary and Bill Clinton know the mini-series’ planned by Big Media will be hit jobs:

“It’s a bit rich for [Chuck] Todd and [Andrea] Mitchell to cry foul now about their journalistic purity being contaminated by commercial and ideological considerations,” says independent TV news analyst Andrew Tyndall. “As if the MSNBC lineup where Todd and Mitchell ply their trade every day is not shared with activist ideologues such as Al Sharpton and Ed Schultz.”

To that end, sources at NBC News say that it was not simply Republican ire that set the news division on edge. Rather, it was the specter of retaliation from the former first lady and secretary of state, who very well could be a leading 2016 presidential candidate. The Clintons’ penchant for grudges is legendary. And Hillary in 2008 threatened to boycott an MSNBC-sponsored debate over former anchor David Shuster’s comment that Chelsea Clinton had been “pimped out” for her mother’s campaign. Any scripted Clinton project almost certainly would include content objectionable to Bill and Hillary. “The Clintons are the ones to worry about,” says an NBC source. “Who needs those headaches?”

We need a fair election in 2016 not one manipulated by Big Media. Big Media manipulation that “benefits” Hillary Clinton is as offensive as the Big Media manipulation that protected and fluffed pillows for Barack Obama.

Bill and Hillary Clinton by now must know that Big Media will turn against them at some point. It’s already happening. The moment the DailyKooks and the left decide on their Stalinist candidate, Hillary Clinton will once again be under attack by the left and for the left. Big Media and the DailyKooks are allies. Big Media threatens our democracy. Big Media is the enemy.

Republicans, Democrats, Independents, must realize we are not each other’s enemies- at worst we are ideological opponents deserving of a fair and clean electoral system in which to settle our disputes and the direction of the nation. Big Media is the enemy. Obama Dimocrats are allied with Big Media. Big Media is the enemy. Big Media is the enemy.


Some, some, not all and certainly not here, Hillary Clinton 2016 supporters are acting as stupid as Republicans. Granted, acting as stupid as Republican “leaders” is pretty darn difficult to do because Republicans are harnessed with some of the dumbest motherfuc#ing “leaders” ever.

Wanna know how stupid these motherfu#king GOP leaders are? Consider what was said today, by the kinda nice, kinda cute, Mr. Chairman “leader” of the Republicans Reince Priebus: Romney’s call for “self-deportation” of illegals was racist and horrific. How stupid is that for setting up the immigration reform debate for Republicans?

Mitt Romney was stating what is written in the Republican platform but somehow Republican #1 denounces Romney’s statement and his own party’s position on immigration reform. Priebus now denies saying “racist” even though earlier in the day the RNC press shop confirmed the use of the word “racist” by Priebus. What rank and file Republicans are left with is their own chairman calling their own party’s position on immigration reform “horrific”. How stupid are these motherf#ckers? JUST HOW STUPID ARE THESE MOTHERFU#KERS? Makes you wanna holler!

On Egypt these motherfu#kers are even dumber. We’ll say why in a subsequent post this coming week. On the NSA, the motherfuc#kers are dumber still. We’ll also follow up on this in the coming week but for now Harry Enten at The Guardian will serve as an appetizer “Barack Obama’s lost youth – The president’s approval rating is falling faster among young people than any other group. Will Republicans capitalise on it?” Don’t bet on Republicans capitalizing on anything other than stupidity. The NSA scandal and all the news about these corruptions are turning the internet generation of young ‘uns against Obama but the RNC is busy waving the Hillary flag in order to distract their voters from the betrayals on immigration reform and other issues they are planning (we discuss this at the end of this article).

As to Hillary Clinton 2016 supporters, some are competing in the stupid Olympics. The Republicans get the gold on stupid but some Hillary Clinton 2016 supporters are going for the bronze or silver. Here’s our message to Republicans, Independents, Hillary Clinton 2016 supporters:


Republicans, conservatives, Hillary supporters, real liberals, FDR/Bill Clinton Democrats know this. Only the DailyKooks profit by Big Media control of our political process.

THE ENEMY IS BIG MEDIA. Any Hillary Clinton 2016 supporter who thinks Hillary Clinton is going to get a fair shake from NBC or CNN is mentally deranged. CNN got rid of Hillary supporters in 2008 (Carville and Begala) but kept on Obama shills like Donna Brazile. MSNBC/NBC of course require no explanation or examples about their Hillary hatred. On MSNBC Chelsea Clinton was a ho for her pimping parents and a beating of Hillary in a back room was the suggestion from their top host. Some fools will believe this has changed and that Big Media will now glorify Hillary. But once an Elizabeth Warren, a Martin O’Malley, perhaps a Cory Booker or even a Michelle Obama decides to run in 2016 Big Media will revert to Hillary hate form.

There is however an even more important reason, other than the hatred Hillary Clinton has received from NBC/MSNBC and CNN (not to absolve ABC or CBS), to oppose the planned Big Media biographies of Hillary. We need to cage Big Media not help it. We must throttle those corruptions we call “Big Media” not assist them as they pervert the national discussion. A Big Media crusade on behalf of Hillary Clinton 2016 will be just as repulsive as was the Big Media crusade against Hillary Clinton in 2008.

What Big Media giveth Big Media polluteth. Big Media does not contribute to the national discourse in a positive way. The concern of Big Media is Big Media and Big Media power. Today we read at ex-Politico smear artist Ben Smith’s new pollutant website that his old Politico home is a culprit. Ben Smith published the hit piece because he is upset that his BUZZFEED home is not getting invites so he attacks those that get the invites:

“Despite transforming itself from “the place for politics” to a shamelessly left-leaning political media outlet while in the midst of an almost constant struggle with CNN for second place in the cable news ratings war, MSNBC has managed to stay relevant in the world of political news by using one weird trick: blanketing the airwaves with politicians and journalists from D.C. and New York who practically live on Twitter.

With Jeff Zucker’s CNN drifting away from politics and toward celebrity stories and true crime — and Fox News sticking closely to its stable of “Republican strategists” and in-house conservative pundits — MSNBC has its pick of the entire political press corps. And it has made itself central to the online political conversation by sending its black town cars to collect younger, web-savvy politicos who spend all day chattering about the ins and outs of the game online.

The most notable example of their model is the almost constant presence of two of D.C.’s most influential political media outlets on the network — The Washington Post and Politico.

Big Media only cares about Big Media. Ben Smith is upset that he is not invited on all these silly shows that only those that appear on them watch so Ben Smith throws a hissy fit denouncing his old pigsty Politico. Big Media only cares about Big Media.

Hillary Clinton 2016 supporters, independents, Republicans, and anyone interested in an intelligent fact filled discussion of the countries many woes (thanks Barack!) should keep Big Media in a cage. THE ENEMY IS BIG MEDIA.

Hillary Clinton 2016 supporters and Republicans should cage Big Media in a rusty cholera prison. What should Hillary Clinton 2016 supporters and Republicans do specifically? That’s simple: Take the debates in-house. Take Big Media out of the equation entirely.

By 2016 the internet should be even more ubiquitous that it already is. The Republican Party should sponsor all their debates and produce all their debates. Big Media outlets that want to can broadcast the debates. We can all be sure Fox News, the highest rated cable news channel, will cover all the debates. Republicans under no circumstances should ever put themselves in the position of a Big Media “moderator” siding with the opposition ever again (recall Candy Crowley).

For Hillary Clinton the equation at first blush appears more complicated because so many presume Big Media will be on her side in 2016. But we don’t believe that for a second. We recall how the “moderators” (such as the now dead swine Tim Russert) marshaled themselves to rescue Barack Obama during the debates in the 2008 election cycle.

Immediately after the New Hampshire primary in 2008 we wrote:

“The next debate in Nevada on January 15 will be hosted by MSNBC. If Chris Matthews or Tim Russert are moderating these debates Hillary should refuse to attend. Let Matthews and Russert and Obama and Edwards attack her all they want but Hillary should make it clear she will no longer put up with their misogyny. At the very least, before the debate the campaign should preempt the “Iron My Shirt” brigade by demonstrating how soft they have been on Obama and how relentlessly unfair they have been towards Hillary Clinton. The campaign can research all the disgusting things MSNBC has aired and make it clear in specific terms how disgusting MSNBC has been.”

Hillary Clinton should ally herself with Republicans and attack Big Media NOW before Big Media resumes its attack on her!. The best way to attack Big Media is to hit the wallet. Big Media wants to make money on debates which feature Republicans and Hillary Clinton. Hit Big Media in the wallet Hillary and agitate to take the nomination debates in-house.

In 2008 Hillary Clinton’s campaign did not listen to our advice regarding Big Media. When Big Media attacked, Hillary’s campaign was woefully unprepared. You better listen to us now Hillary!

* * * * * *

Today along with his “horrific” comments trashing Mitt Romney, Reince Preibus and the GOP “leaders” pulled a fast one, worthy of slimy Barack Obama, against rank and file Republicans. It’s all a phony baloney ploy on the part of the RNC. Preibus announced the Done deal: RNC votes not to co-sponsor Republican debates with CNN and NBC if Hillary movies air:

“Show of hands among our conservative readership: Who thinks that ABC and CBS, which are still good to go, are appreciably less biased against the right than the now-banned NBC and CNN are? Wasn’t it George Stephanopoulos, an ABC anchor and former Clinton apparatchik, who kicked off the “war on women” garbage last year by asking Romney that out-of-left-field question about contraception? Let’s say, purely to appease the RNC, CNN decides it’ll throw together a documentary about the GOP nominee too once he’s chosen. Will that suddenly make CNN copacetic again? Here’s a compromise: Let CNN run its dumb Hillary hagiography on the condition that Jake Tapper gets to moderate the GOP debate. That’ll get you a fair result more than running into ABC’s and CBS’s arms will.

The RNC’s goal here isn’t to strike a blow against media bias. That’s window-dressing for grassroots conservatives, just as the whispers about letting Rush Limbaugh host a debate were. The point is to cut down the number of debates, which will reduce the opportunities for strong establishment candidates to make embarrassing gaffes and reduce the opportunities for strong tea-party candidates to leap in the polls with winning debate performances. And even on those terms, the “ban” is feeble. As Dave Weigel notes, the text of the resolution doesn’t specify a penalty for candidates who defy the RNC and choose to participate in an NBC/CNN debate. It simply says that the RNC won’t be a co-sponsor. The RNC could impose a penalty later but docking delegates from any candidate who chose to take his chances with NBC or CNN moderators would only end up alienating some of his supporters, which risks Republicans staying home for the general election. It’s an empty threat.”

So why the charade? Preibus and the RNC know that waving the anti-Hillary flag makes Republicans lose their senses sufficiently that a ring can be drilled through their noses and a rope to “lead” them attached. Preibus and the RNC figure if they talk tough against Hillary the rank and file Republicans won’t notice their many attempts to sell them out on immigration reform and every other issue the rank and file cares about. Wave the Hillary flag and the E takes over the I – stupidity reigns. Preibus knows this, he’s not completely stupid when it comes to bamboozling his own party members.

For Hillary Clinton 2016 supporters and Republicans it is time to put the I over the E and realize BIG MEDIA IS THE ENEMY.


Oprah Pigs Out

Matt Damon is an idiot and an obnoxious hypocrite. Matt Damon is no longer the pretty boy of old. Matt Damon has turned paunchy and bald. Matt Damon however is just a piglet when compared to that hog of hogs Oprah Winfrey.

Pig Oprah, the once and future crackhead, built her brand and bilked her billions by lying to white women. Pig Oprah was all about women’s rights. Then… Pig Oprah in 2008 showed her true colors and her pig character. In 2008 Pig Oprah declared that in all her life she had never seen a politician as wonderful as wannabee black man Barack Obama. Pig Oprah used her then popularity and money gotten from white women to campaign against a white woman and for her half black Messiah Barack.

Pig Oprah Winfrey attended the “church” of Jeremiah Wright but reportedly she realized that if white women uncovered her association with that race-baiter it might cost her money. Pig Oprah left the “church” of Jeremiah Wright. Pig Oprah knew what a hate filled “church” Jeremiah Wright presided over. Pig Oprah also knew that Barack Obama remained in that hate filled “church”. Pig Oprah has no excuse that she did not know what swine Barack Obama associated with. Pig Oprah knew what Barack Obama’s mentor Jeremiah Wright was. Pig Oprah knew.

After Pig Oprah endorsed Barack Obama in 2008 many white women fled from the Oprah pigsty. Oprah is now in a cable pigsty few know about and even less watch. Pig Oprah is still in the news however.

Recently Pig Oprah found another exceptional politician she supports. It’s another black man. Cory Booker is now the latest exceptional politician Oprah is funding and supporting. Pig Oprah supports black men for political office and trashes white women who stand in their way as Hillary Clinton and Sarah Palin found out.

Pig Oprah continues her lies and race-baiting. Hey, remember when once upon a time us good liberals were appalled at the thought of skinning alligators for use as fashion accessories? Well, today that gossip site TMZ helps us roast Pig Oprah:

“Passive Aggressive Oprah

Gives BS Apology for Switzerland Racist Flap

Oprah Winfrey says she’s kinda sorta “sorry” for the fallout that ensued after she told the media about a “racist” encounter at a purse store in Switzerland … saying, “I’m really sorry that it got blown up.”

Yeah, right.

Oprah addressed the media at the premiere of “The Butler” in L.A. last night — backpedaling after the shop in question started to refute O’s allegations of racism during an incident last month.

The shop owner says the whole thing was a “misunderstanding” and had “nothing to do with racism.”

Last night, Oprah said … “I think that incident in Switzerland was just an incident in Switzerland. I’m really sorry that it got blown up. I purposefully did not mention the name of the store. I’m sorry that I said it was Switzerland.”

Problem is … O’s full of it. What did she think was going to happen when she went on national TV and cried racism? The media was just going to ignore that??

Oprah once ragged on hamburgers and single-handedly CRIPPLED the beef industry. She knew damn well how the media was going to handle the Switzerland situation … which is why she went to the media in the first place. Her mission was to destroy the shop.

There are some people who are saying Oprah’s Swiss encounter wasn’t really about race — Oprah was just mad she wasn’t treated like Her Royal O-ness because the shop employee didn’t recognize her … but now, after the employee told the media she’s being unfairly attacked, O’s feeling a little guilty.

But pretending not to know about the impact of her race allegations?? That’s like Obama pretending not to know what’s gonna happen if he pushes that big red button in the White House.

C’mon O … you’re smarter than that. And so are we.”

Oprah Winfrey is a pig. Oprah Winfrey is a big fat race-baiting pig. Oprah Winfrey is a big fat race-baiting hypocritical lying pig. So who better to sell ObamaCare?

The supposedly serious The Hill is selling a pig. Writes The Hill, and not in jest, Does Obama need OprahCare?:

Could Oprah sell ObamaCare to America?

That’s the question on the lips of healthcare activists who are hoping the talk show queen will put her considerable influence behind the promotional campaign for President Obama’s signature law.

The billionaire media mogul is a supporter and family friend of the Obamas but has given no indication she’s interested in participating in the enrollment push that is set to begin this fall.

That said, the White House is aggressively tapping its network of allies in Hollywood as it looks to drum up publicity for ObamaCare, with Oprah among the most powerful supporters of all.

Marketing experts say her involvement would be a game changer.

“She has one of the most powerful brands in America,” said Allen Adamson, managing director at brand consulting firm Landor Associates.

If the White House isn’t calling her, they should be.”

The administration has pursued celebrity endorsements for ObamaCare as a way to drum up participation in the insurance exchanges that are set to launch on Oct. 1. [snip]

There are signs that Oprah might be willing to step back into politics after a noticeable absence.

She recently hosted a fundraiser for Newark Mayor Cory Booker (D), who is running for Senate in New Jersey, and is starring in a forthcoming political film about a longtime African-American butler at the White House.

Her criticism of the acquittal of George Zimmerman, who killed unarmed black teenager Trayvon Martin in Florida last year, also made headlines this summer.”

Oprah is a pig and lots of white women know that and won’t be used again. Hillary Clinton supporters from 2008 certainly know that:

Oprah is already set to visit the White House later this year, as Obama announced just last week that she is among this year’s recipients of the Medal of Freedom, the highest award given to civilians.

But promoting one of the most controversial laws in decades would be a big risk for Winfrey to take.

Her favorability with the public dropped sharply in 2008 after she endorsed and campaigned with Obama. The move alienated both right-leaning viewers and those who supported Hillary Clinton.

Some analysts linked the endorsement to a subsequent drop in ratings for “The Oprah Winfrey Show.” She shifted tactics in 2012, choosing to support Obama but not actively promote him.

Oprah would risk tarnishing her brand by associating herself with the polarizing healthcare law. According to a recent CBS survey, 39 percent now support full repeal of ObamaCare, the highest level ever found in the organization’s polling.”

Pig Oprah sell ObamaCare? She might as well try to buy an $38,000 alligator bag in Switzerland. ObamaCare supporters have a really hard time selling ObamaCare even when the audience is supposed to be on their side. Watch how easy it is for Rand Paul to demolish ObamaCare on… the Daily Show???:

Whatever one’s political views on Rand Paul and his arguments on the Daily Show we can all agree that Pig Oprah would not stand up to an intelligent discussion of ObamaCare with Rand Paul. We also doubt Pig Oprah can even begin to explain away to “the people” the latest ObamaCare scam. Who’s up for another arbitrary delay in ObamaCare?

“One of the selling points for ObamaCare was its mandates on insurance companies to keep out-of-pocket costs down for consumers. In fact, next to the promise of universal insurance (which turns out to be illusory, too), the cap on out-of-pocket expenses was supposed to be the best part of ObamaCare for consumers. That, of course, just means that insurer risk pools have to cover more of the actual costs of medical care, which means that the costs will get passed along to consumers in the form of higher premiums. And right now, skyrocketing premiums are the Obama administration’s biggest political headache.

Guess which part of ObamaCare just got delayed now?”

The scam called ObamaCare is falling apart but the liars want Pig Oprah to sell this train wreck:

“First, there was the delay of Obamacare’s Medicare cuts until after the election. Then there was the delay of the law’s employer mandate. Then there was the announcement, buried in the Federal Register, that the administration would delay enforcement of a number of key eligibility requirements for the law’s health insurance subsidies, relying on the “honor system” instead. Now comes word that another costly provision of the health law—its caps on out-of-pocket insurance costs—will be delayed for one more year.

According to the Congressional Research Service, as of November 2011, the Obama administration had missed as many as one-third of the deadlines, specified by law, under the Affordable Care Act. Here are the details on the latest one.

Obamacare contains a blizzard of mandates and regulations that will make health insurance more costly. One of the most significant is its caps on out-of-pocket insurance costs, such as co-pays and deductibles. Section 2707(b) of the Public Health Service Act, as added by Obamacare, requires that “a group health plan and a health insurance issuer offering group or individual health insurance coverage may not establish lifetime limits on the dollar value of benefits for the any participant or beneficiary.” Annual limits on cost-sharing are specified by Section 1302(c) of the Affordable Care Act; in addition, starting in 2014, deductibles are limited to $2,000 per year for individual plans, and $4,000 per year for family plans. [snip]

According to the law, the limits on out-of-pocket costs for 2014 were $6,350 for individual policies and $12,700 for family ones. But in February, the Department of Labor published a little-noticed rule delaying the cap until 2015. The delay was described yesterday by Robert Pear in the New York Times.

Delay needed to align ‘separate computer systems’

Notes Pear, “Under the [one-year delay], many group health plans will be able to maintain separate out-of-pocket limits for benefits in 2014. As a result, a consumer may be required to pay $6,350 for doctors’ services and hospital care, and an additional $6,350 for prescription drugs under a plan administered by a pharmacy benefit manager.”

The reason for the delay? “Federal officials said that many insurers and employers needed more time to comply because they used separate companies to help administer major medical coverage and drug benefits, with separate limits on out-of-pocket costs. In many cases, the companies have separate computer systems that cannot communicate with one another.”

The best part in Pear’s story is when a “senior administration official” said that “we had to balance the interests of consumers with the concerns of health plan sponsors and carriers…They asked for more time to comply.” Exactly how is it in consumers’ interests to pay far more for health insurance than they do already?

It’s not.”

Pig Oprah to sell this slop? John Oliver has trouble selling ObamaCare to the Daily Show audience but Pig Oprah is supposed to do so? We suppose Pig Oprah will shout “RACISM” to sell ObamaCare and tar ObamaCare opponents like she did over a $38,000 alligator skin purse:

“Oprah Winfrey’s disturbing story from last Friday about being told by a Swiss store’s shop assistant that a handbag she wanted to look at was something she could not afford, is being called “untrue” by the sales clerk in question.

The sales clerk, whose name was only given as “Adriana N.” told the Swiss newspaper SonntagsBlick that Winfrey’s story “absolutely untrue.”

“I even asked her if she wanted to take a closer look at the bag. Mrs. (sic) Winfrey looked around in the store again, but did not say anything further,” Adriana told the paper. “Then she went downstairs with her companion. My colleague held the door open for them. They were not even five minutes in our store.”

As Winfrey told the story recently to both Entertainment Tonight and Larry King, she wanted to look at a $38,000 handbag but was reportedly told it was “too expensive” for her. According to Winfrey, the clerk then opted to show her a cheaper line of handbags. Winfrey took offense, presuming that she was being offered less-expensive bags because she was black.

That’s not true,” Adriana said. “That is absurd. I would never say anything like that to a customer.”

The store was later revealed as Trois Pomme, in Zurich. The owner of the chain of stores, Trudy Götz, apologized publicly to Winfrey, as did the Swiss tourism office.

The accusation of racism has turned Adriana’s world upside-down, she said. “I have not been able to sleep for days. I feel as if I was in the middle of a hurricane. Totally powerless, also helpless. What is happening is horror.” [snip]

She is so powerful and I am only a salesperson. I did not harm anyone. I also don’t understand why she has to exploit this so broadly on TV.”

Adriana, who says she is Italian, did not recognize Winfrey when she entered the store, but says that “would not have made a difference. We try really hard to meet all people with the same respect and to treat everybody equal. If somebody asks me to show an item, I always present it.”

Pig Oprah does not want equality. Pig Oprah wants subservience. Pig Oprah wanted subservience from that white woman who works in a store. Pig Oprah lives in Elysium with Matt Damon and Barack Obama. These three pigs say they care about “the people” but all they care about is themselves.


Holy Fiasco Friday Batman! Barack Obama To Meet Idiot Matt Damon In Elysium

Update: Try to stay awake. The usual Obama publicity stunt on a Friday before vacation is on. Most everyone is likely to write an open thread: Obama presser type article/blog entry to discuss this non-event. The usual lies and sounds of distorted reality will be emitted. We don’t expect Big Media to ask Obama a question about how life is in Elysium with once pretty boy Matt and his private school kids hypocrisy.


Warning! Another publicity stunt tomorrow! Barack Obama, as usual before every one of his many vacations, will perform at a press conference publicity stunt. The press conference publicity stunt is scheduled on a midsummer Friday so that when Obama proves himself a boob, again, the news or lack of news will be lost to the public because Big Media will have an excuse to ignore the gaffes sure to come. After the publicity stunt Barack goes to Elysium to meet with hypocrite and idiot Matt Damon.

We’ve discussed the once pretty boy, Matt, back in 2011. Our article then was titled Matt Damon Proves He Is Too Stupid To Be Allowed To Criticize Sarah Palin (fun videos to be watched there). Pretty boy Matt of course used to be a big stupid Obama supporter in 2008 and attacked every woman who dared challenge giving Barack Obama more authority than getting Bill Clinton coffee. Now Matt is getting paunchy, bald, and grumpy, – not to mention more hypocritical and idiotic than ever. Paunchy is now so grumpy he is even unhappy with Barack.

But there was a time when the boy blunder used to love himself some Barack. Did you read our last article about Obama’s Face? It’s not just that “milky loads” pig Andrew Sullivan nor overly botoxed horse-face John Kerry that loved Obama’s Face. Then pretty Matt Damon had this to say about Barack, “I think a lot of the problems in the world would be mitigated if he were the face of our country.” That’s not exactly an example of what Matt condescendingly calls “higher order thinking” is it?

We’ll get back to Matt Damon and his meeting with Barack in Elysium shortly. We need to bid good riddance to Barack as he goes on his latest multimillion taxpayer subsidized vacation. Barack Obama, like his mentor Jeremiah Wright, who shouted ‘na, na, na, Not God bless America, God Damn America’ on the Sunday after September 11, 2001 and then moved to a gated community and into a mansion so big it has an elevator in it, Obama knows where to get his buns butttered.

Like the man who mentored him and from whom he borrowed for a book title – Barack is on his way to Elysium for vacation:

“When he vacations on Martha’s Vineyard, President Obama will stay at the $7.6 million home of a wealthy financier who specializes in corporate restructuring, the type of thing Obama and his allies mercilessly slammed Mitt Romney for during the 2012 campaign.

The owner, David Schulte, is the founder of Chilmark Partners, a company that has been “been providing companies, creditors, and other key stakeholders with clear, careful advice in complex restructuring situations for more than 27 years,” according to its website. The firm also “has decades of mergers and acquisition experience, both in distressed contexts and for healthy companies.” Schulte “has more than 30 years of restructuring experience” and before Chilmark “created and ran Salomon Brothers Corporate Reorganization Group.”

Bain Capital, which Romney led, took controlling stakes in companies and restructured them – sometimes painfully – in an effort to profit from a newly lean and mean corporation. For this basic exercise in capitalism, Romney was relentlessly pilloried during the 2012 campaign as an iniquitous corporate looter by Obama and his Democratic allies. [snip]

But Obama’s moral objections to Romney’s behavior apparently end at the door of his exquisite new vacation rental property.”

Ambrosia. How wonderful to be in Elysium! How knee buckling the splendors of isolation with your own kind. It must be thrilling to know that you’ve left all those poor saps in Chicago, hiding from murderers and poverty, not to mention the stench of the stockyard history, so so behind after so successfully fooling the boobs with flowery words. This weekend is one of entertainments and who knows what debaucheries behind the gates. Perhaps the citizens of Elysium will gather together to watch the film Elysium? Ya think? Maybe?

There’s nothing Obama likes more for relaxation than watching himself so why not watch Elysium the film? Elysium the film opens nationwide tonight as Thursday becomes Friday. By now you must have heard of the film Elysium, right? Elysium stars Matt Damon:

“‘Elysium’ director Neill Blomkamp, star Matt Damon deny movie has political agenda

LOS ANGELES – The Hollywood Reporter calls it a “politically charged flight of speculative fiction.”

Newsmax refers to it “sci-fi socialism” and “political propaganda.”

Variety said its one of the “more openly socialist political agendas of any Hollywood movie in memory, beating the drum loudly not just for universal healthcare, but for open borders, unconditional amnesty and the abolition of class distinctions as well.” [snip]

“I don’t think it is trying to say anything. It just presents the issue – the distinct difference between the haves and the have nots,” he told FOX411 while promoting the flick.”

The haves and the have nots? We know what side Barack Obama and Matt Damon are on. In the “two Americas” hypocrite treacherous boob Barack and idiot once-pretty boy Matt stand with John Edwards and Jeremiah Wright. They’re all in Elysium:

“Set in the year 2154, “Elysium” imagines a world where two distinct classes remain. There is the overpopulated, crime-riddled, poverty-stricken slums of Earth, and then there are the excessively wealthy who reside on Elysium, a slick, mind-blowing man-made space station that comes complete with a cure for every illness, and humans and robots that stop at nothing to enforce anti-immigration laws and preserve the luxurious lifestyles of Elysium’s lucky few.

Doesn’t this tiresome movie plot sound like Detroit versus wherever Barack Obama is?

Which is not to say that Boob Barack is entirely welcome in Elysium. As our commenter Lil Ole Grape would no doubt remind us, not everyone in Elysium wants to see that Obama mole scarred puss:

“Some of the local newspapers on Martha’s Vineyard report that island goers “can expect extraordinary and lengthy up-Island detours, after President Barack Obama and his family arrive Saturday.” [snip]

One commenter responds, “He really needs to find another place to go. He treats people here terribly.”

Darn it, there are dissidents even in Elysium!:

“The official synopsis for the upcoming science fiction film “Elysium” has been released online. It’s from “District 9” director Neill Blomkamp and stars Matt Damon and Jodie Foster:

In the year 2159 two classes of people exist: the very wealthy who live on a pristine man-made space station called Elysium, and the rest, who live on an overpopulated, ruined Earth. Secretary Rhodes (Jodie Foster), a hard line government official, will stop at nothing to enforce anti-immigration laws and preserve the luxurious lifestyle of the citizens of Elysium. That doesn’t stop the people of Earth from trying to get in, by any means they can. When unlucky Max (Matt Damon) is backed into a corner, he agrees to take on a daunting mission that if successful will not only save his life, but could bring equality to these polarized worlds.

Darn that Jodie Foster! How dare she block immigration reform! Er… we forgot for a few seconds that it’s just a film. Still… immigration reform in what passes for the real world would really hurt low wage workers in America today... but what the Hell, Barack has to help keep down wages doesn’t he? That’s why Matt Damon looking for workers on his Elysium plantation is happy about Plan B on immigration reform for amnesty supporters: Have Obama issue an order granting temporary amnesty. But back to the movie.

Elysium, the film sucks! That’s what Matt Demon’s friends and Barack Obama supporters at The Atlantic think:

“The Epic Disappointments of ‘Elysium’ [snip]

Loud, clunky, and disappointingly shallow, Blomkamp didn’t rock the studio system so much as it seemingly rocked him.

What’s most jarring, and dismaying, about Elysium — about a ruined and impoverished 22nd century Earth and the gleaming space arcology where all the rich people live — is how many tired action movie cliches Blomkamp traffics in. There are many, far too many, Matrix-esque slo-mo shots, so predictable and hacky by now that parts of Elysium look no more sophisticated than a Resident Evil movie. [snip]

In addition to the corny tricks and gimmicks that Blomkamp uses to gild his cluttered, ultra-violent (several people gorily explode in the movie) action sequences, Elysium suffers from a dearth of thoughtfulness. The allegory he’s working with here is about immigration and health care, and while those are indeed pressing topics ripe for spinning into dark and insisting fables, here the messaging is too literal and blunt. A ship full of illegals lands on (in?) Elysium and they flee like immigrants across the U.S./Mexico border, only to be brutally and inhumanely captured. Basic healthcare is hardly available on Earth, whereas on Elysium they have machines that can cure anything, essentially granting immortality. [snip]

Elysium is a disappointment. A big one, in fact.”

Sounds like Elysium the flim sucks huh? But before we descend, or ascend, into movie reviewers let’s discuss that lovable ex-pretty boy blockhead Matt Damon and Barack “the boob” Obama. They are the worst of our American Elysium:

The place in which they currently work, snicker, frolic, and make millions, is in fact Elysium.

If you want to experience “Elysium” today, just drive down Wilshire or Melrose. In just a couple of miles those famous boulevards turn from a gorgeous, mile-high, palm tree-lined gilded city where the Matt Damons shop, dine, exercise, enema, valet, facelift, chant, and enjoy the greatest healthcare in the world — to shit-hole city: urban sprawl, graffiti, crime, filth, and grinding poverty.”

The hypocrite idiots called Barack Obama and Matt Damon are the worse of any Elysium. The treacherous boob Barack:

Obama simply cannot be trusted. Obama cannot be trusted on any issue. Obama cannot be trusted by his friends. Obama cannot be trusted by his enemies. Obama cannot be trusted.

What about Matt Damon? We know he’s an idiot. Is he a hypocrite? You betcha:

“He’s an actor. And activist. And, so brave. A bravactivist. Who high-tails it from the status quo he enables at the first sign his own children might have to suffer the crappy education the rest of the little people do.

A father of four (three daughters, aged seven, five and three, and a stepdaughter, 15), this summer he is moving his family from New York to Los Angeles, and the challenge of giving them a childhood that remotely resembles the one he enjoyed is about to get even harder.

Choosing a school has already presented a major moral dilemma. “Sending our kids in my family to private school was a big, big, big deal. And it was a giant family discussion. But it was a circular conversation, really, because ultimately we don’t have a choice. I mean, I pay for a private education and I’m trying to get the one that most matches the public education that I had, but that kind of progressive education no longer exists in the public system. It’s unfair.” Damon has campaigned against teachers’ pay being pegged to children’s test results: “So we agitate about those things, and try to change them, and try to change the policy, but you know, it’s a tough one.”

Hypocrite John Edwards used foundation money that was supposed to fight poverty to pay for his personal travel around the country when he ran for president. Edwards then premised his campaign as a “two Americas” war on poverty even as he built a monster house on real estate in Elysium. Likewise Matt Damon is a hypocrite of monumental proportions. In 2011 pretty boy Matt stroked his activism on behalf of public schools, in public:

What flowery words Matt. How dreamy! Too bad you won’t send your kids to be beaten up on buses because they refuse to buy drugs in the public schools you have flowery words for but won’t put your money or kids where your idiot mouth is. But then again you and Barack live in Elysium don’t you?

How wonderful it is to live in Elysium where you are exempt from your own words.

Matt Damon and Barack Obama have made wonderful lives for themselves by having two faces. One face is the public compassionate face that emits soothing verbiage against the “capitalist system” and that wins applause from fools happy to be parted from their money and their well being.

The other face is ugly, brutal, hate-filled for anyone that stands in their way. They are leaders in Elysium.

If that’s an example of Elysium – we’ll stay in the good ol’ U.S.A.


Obama’s Face Revisited Again – With Chisels

Update: Don’t get excited about the news that’s Breaking: First criminal charges filed over Benghazi attack. It’s just a publicity stunt indictment of one of the leaders of the murderous attack against America on September 11 in Benghazi. Lawsuits are not the way to fight the war on terror and murderous Islam.

The lawsuit is an Obama publicity stunt designed to block CNN’s curious interest in Benghazi especially as September 11 appears on the horizon. Tonight CNN is following up on it’s hours of interviews with the now indicted Khattalah by airing a one hour special on the Obama “phony” scandal – the murder of an American ambassador.

With this publicity stunt indictment the most we can expect is a trial focused on “work place violence” as we are currently witnessing in the terror trial “work place violence” trial of Muslim murderer Hasan. The way to fight terror is not with law proceedings in the courts. HOPE and wishes won’t stop terror. Today that obvious fact is acknowledged by the WaPo: Obama’s wishful thinking won’t win war on terror. The Washington Post is really perplexed:

THE STATE Department has shuttered 19 embassies for a week, fearing terrorist attacks. Hundreds of prisoners, including senior al-Qaeda operatives, have busted loose in prison breaks in Iraq, Libya and Pakistan. At Bagram air base in Afghanistan, The Post’s Kevin Sieff reports, U.S. forces are holding 67 non-Afghan prisoners, many of whom can’t be tried in court but are too dangerous to release.

Meanwhile President Obama says he wants to “refine and ultimately repeal” the mandate Congress has given him to fight the war on terror. What’s going on here?

The answer of course is that Barack Obama is not qualified to be president because he does not have a world view congruent with reality. As we note in our main article the problem is Obama and his lies which so many dupes believed in 2008 and in 2012. Others have noticed Obama is the problem:

“Vague terrorist threats shutting down nineteen of our embassies, Russian strongman Putin thumbing his nose at President Obama, Iran jerking our chain – the U.S. hasn’t looked this cowardly on the world stage since the Jimmy Carter administration.

Here at home, too, we’ve gone back to the Carter future; unemployment is high, Keynesian economics are all the rage, our professorial president is increasingly whiny and ineffectual; all that’s missing is a cardigan sweater and that infernal violin. [snip]

Both Carter and Obama came to office convinced that by dint of righteousness or personality they could win over our enemies. That it was just a matter of persuasion. [snip]

Naivete is costly. Both the Carter and Obama administrations have been distinguished by the rare murder of an ambassador. [snip]

The parallels between the Carter and Obama presidencies are not accidental. Both men were elected in what amounted to a national rejection of their predecessors.

Neither candidate had any significant executive experience or foreign policy chops.

Carter ran on being an honest man – not Tricky Dick Nixon. Obama ran on being likeable and eager to unite the country – not arrogant and divisive George W. Bush.

Both men promised change, and fulfilled that promise. Unhappily, they did not always deliver change for the better.

The similarities between Obama and Carter are not confined to foreign fiascos.”

Foreign and domestic fiascoes almost as if by design courtesy of Barack Obama. Expect more fiascoes and more publicity stunts. Tonight there will be another Barack Obama publicity stunt as he appears on the Jay Leno Tonight Show. It will be up to a professional clown to ask tough questions to the bumbling White House clown.


Much of the political commentary this midsummer, from the left and the right, is fixated on Barack Obama’s propaganda machine of 2012. The narrative focuses on Obama’s 2012 election year declaration that he not only killed Bin Laden but ‘on the run’ al-Qaeda as well. GM and Detroit, the boast followed, lived on because of Obama. This narrative is generous to Obama and his acolytes. In addition this narrative is dangerous because it avoids the central lesson to be learned.

By now, less than a year away from the 2012 elections, only the crackheads believe Detroit is an item on the parched blank sheet of Obama “successes”. The election year 2012 Obama claim that al-Qaeda is on the run or dead likewise is buried as terrorist threats have closed American embassies in nearly two dozen countries worldwide. After the announced one day closure, the State Department announced Embassy closures extended until Saturday.

There is really no need to know the details of what is going on with this latest Obama debacle. Some reports are that there are some reports that report the threats are real:

“U.S. intelligence officials are dealing with the most credible terrorist threat in years as 19 diplomatic posts in the Middle East and Africa remain closed through this upcoming Saturday.

CBS News reports that a large-scale attack may be imminent as al-Qaeda terrorists in the Arabian Peninsula already have their orders and could be in place for execution of the alleged plot. [snip]

In recent days, U.S. officials have said they have received significant and detailed intelligence suggesting a possible attack, with some clues pointing to the al-Qaeda terror network. The State Department said the potential for terrorism was particularly acute in the Middle East and North Africa, with a possible attack occurring on or coming from the Arabian Peninsula.”

Some have doubts and believe that perhaps the threats are exaggerated. Jeffrey Goldberg is embarrassed for the home of the brave:

“It seems as if al-Qaeda, or its Arabian Peninsula branch, has succeeded in terrorizing the United States of America again, but this time without – as of this writing – detonating an ounce of C4. It doesn’t strike me as a wise idea to preemptively shutter 21 different American embassies across the Middle East and North Africa in response to NSA-collected terrorist chatter. What message does this post-Benghazi, “don’t say we didn’t tell you” move send to the citizens of the Middle East, who, it is our hope, understand the United States to be a powerful and fearless country dedicated to openness and to the defeat of fanaticism? We have already muddied any message of fearlessness by turning our embassies into bunkers. Now, we are admitting that these bunkers aren’t safe. What next? Virtual embassies on Facebook? Ambassadors who never leave Washington?

The Administration tells us that the heightened threat of al-Qaeda terror extends through the end of the month. Is the State Department going to keep its diplomatic fortresses closed through September 1? Late this afternoon, State announced that 19 diplomatic posts are going to stay closed until August 10; others, including those in Baghdad, and Kabul, of all places, are scheduled to reopen Monday. It is unclear if these closings will be extended, or if the reopening embassies and consulates will again be closed. It could be that many of our diplomats — who, by the way, are still living in the target countries, just in less secure locations, generally, than embassy compounds – will not be at work for awhile.

It is plausible that the intelligence community is fearful of this weekend in particular, because, as Bloomberg’s Nicole Gaouette and David Lerman have noted, Sunday is the Muslim holiday known as the Night of Power, and al-Qaeda-type extremists sometimes mark important holidays on the Muslim calendar by trying to kill people.

The Benghazi attack which killed four Americans occurred on September 11 but somehow that anniversary date did not prompt special awareness. Or maybe it did? Because what was really going on there has not yet been fully explained (ahem, C.I.A.) due to the remarkably effective Obama stonewall, we still are in the information gathering stage even with subpoena power available to House investigators. It’s clear the “Night of Power” has a resonance with Barack that September 11 did not.

But it really is all besides the point we wish to make. Again.

We’ve made this point before and will make it at every possibility. What is the point? What is the lesson that must be learned?

Obama’s Face. Remember Obama’s Face? We’ve written repeatedly about that butt ugly face. But it was butt stupid Andrew Sullivan that first wrote about Obama’s Face:

“What does he offer? First and foremost: his face. Think of it as the most effective potential re-branding of the United States since Reagan. Such a re-branding is not trivial—it’s central to an effective war strategy. The war on Islamist terror, after all, is two-pronged: a function of both hard power and soft power. We have seen the potential of hard power in removing the Taliban and Saddam Hussein. We have also seen its inherent weaknesses in Iraq, and its profound limitations in winning a long war against radical Islam. The next president has to create a sophisticated and supple blend of soft and hard power to isolate the enemy, to fight where necessary, but also to create an ideological template that works to the West’s advantage over the long haul. There is simply no other candidate with the potential of Obama to do this. Which is where his face comes in.

Consider this hypothetical. It’s November 2008. A young Pakistani Muslim is watching television and sees that this man—Barack Hussein Obama—is the new face of America. In one simple image, America’s soft power has been ratcheted up not a notch, but a logarithm. A brown-skinned man whose father was an African, who grew up in Indonesia and Hawaii, who attended a majority-Muslim school as a boy, is now the alleged enemy. If you wanted the crudest but most effective weapon against the demonization of America that fuels Islamist ideology, Obama’s face gets close. It proves them wrong about what America is in ways no words can.

Sullivan wrote that crap in December 2007. It is not only crap it is a dangerous world view.

Barack Obama and his fellators believe that personality and skin color have magic powers sufficient to override national interests. America’s enemies would be transformed because of Obama’s back-slapping, flim-flamming personality allied with the color of his skin. Hasn’t turned out that way has it?

The hate directed at America is not one cured by a big grin and a higher level of melanin. As to melanin, remember when Barack Obama was also going to turn the page on race relations? Instead of a summer of racial love we have suffered through a season of Zimmerman because of race-baiting Barack Obama.

In 2008’s “Dumb White People” we noted how John Kerry played the race card for Barack Obama:

He has an ability to help us bridge the divide of religious extremism. … .. Because he’s African American. Because he’s a black man who has come from a place of oppression and repression in through the years in our own country. We only broke the back of civil rights Jim Crow in the 1960s here. Everybody in the world knows this is a recent journey for America.

John Kerry not only our man in Nantucket, he’s the guy in charge of the embassy closings. He’s not the brightest bulb to rely on at this dark hour.

What should John Kerry know and what should American policy be? First, understand who is still the leader of the post-racial world:

“Andrew Sullivan does not understand that the real post-racial figure in the world today is Barack Obama Osama Bin Laden. Osama Bin Laden, and that young Sullivanesque Pakistani Muslim are post racial.

Osama Bin Laden does not care at all if you are African-American, Jewish-American, Irish-American, White-American, Chinese-American, Indian-American, etc. All Osama Bin Laden cares about is that you are American. Then Osama will kill you. Or try to kill you. Osama Bin Laden is post-racial. Kill Americans. It’s that simple. Osama, does not care if you are black or white, ebony or ivory.

Osama might be gone but if he had a Trayvon, Trayvon would be a terrorist plotting attacks against America.

Second, but most important: America’s enemies hate America because we are a country based on principles they hate. They hate us even more because we thwart them repeatedly and we have the wealth to continue to thwart them.

Until American policy makers deeply understand that the threat directed against us are not due to the color or personality of our leaders, but because of our wealth and power guided by our freedom loving philosophy none of us will be safe.

Further the Andrew Sullivans, John Kerry’s, and assorted Hopium Guzzlers must realize and admit that on the two major Obama promises of 2008 – racial harmony and peace with the Muslim world, Barack has been and is a total failure. That’s the ugly mole that continues to grow on Obama’s face.