Update: Mitt Romney is correct. This election is about jobs not about Obama eating dogs. However the Michael Vick president wanted to attack Romney on Seamus and now that does not seem like such a good idea.
Please understand. We Americans are a good people. You are an innocent Portuguese Water Dog afflicted with a most unfortunate name. You were gifted to your current masters as a political sacrifice by someone who is now dead. Your suffering is not yet ended. Watch your back! Be ever vigilant.
We have to explain to you why we are more worried for you than ever before. Last time we wrote to you directly it was December of 2010. We advised “Run, Bo, Run”. What we wrote then should make your four legs shake:
“While you are kept captive, leashed to that horrible name, you have to be watchful every second. You don’t know what you are living with. None of us completely do.
For instance, your “master”, the one who promised once again for the third or fourth time to keep completely focused on the economy, turned his focus away from the economy to express compassion for this guy:”
The “guy” your master supported is a man called Michael Vick. Now it’s worse Bo. We thought your “master” was a better man, surely not a physical danger to you. Now we see we have been too kind. We have been too innocent. We were fools when we wrote this:
“Supporters say Vick apologized for his actions. But in his famous press conference apology, Vick admitted only to fighting dogs, despite the fact that he pled guilty to all charges, including the killings. He admitted to “making mistakes” and “immature acts.” But deliberately and repeatedly planning dog fights and repeated premeditated violent killings of dogs are not “mistakes.” They are not the acts of someone who’s merely immature. They are the acts of a sociopath and a predator.”
Birds of a feather, Bo. Your “master” took time out from his all important vacation to praise the “second chance” given the monster – the sociopath, the predator. We’re in Jeffry Dahmer territory here Bo.
We’re not saying that your “master” is a dog killing sympathizer. We’re not saying he is a dog killer or animal killer either. What we are saying is that no one knows who this guy is. Common sense tells us to watch out. You should watch out too Bo.“
Back then we did not dare think your master is a “dog killing sympathizer”. Now we cannot be sure. We’re afraid for you Bo. Run, Bo, Run.
We have to give you some history for you to fully understand what is happening Bo. We homo sapiens have things called elections to elect what to you would be something like a pack leader. Your master wormed his way into that prestigious position and he is now up for reelection against a man called Mitt Romney.
Back in September of 2011 we warned that if a man called Romney was the alternative to your horrible master the life of dogs would be an issue in this election. We warned last year:
“There is one Romney problem we have only briefly discussed before and that during the 2008 election cycle. It’s that dog problem. Yeah, that dog problem:
Do we really need to point out that Move-On, or somebody, at the behest of the Obama thugs will recreate that lurid drive for all American voters to see? A few days ago this tongue in cheek item appeared:
“I’m amazed that a 2012 presidential candidate hasn’t taken advantage of that, filmed a series of dog-loving commercials and pushed for things like “more dog beaches” and “better veterinarian health care benefits” as part of their platform. Dog lovers are totally irrational. I include myself. If Obama wants to improve his approval rating, he should rescue a mutt every six weeks and keep, like, 10 or 12 dogs in the White House — he’d have dog-lover voters saying, “Even if I’m let down by the last four years, I gotta be honest … it was pretty neat how Obama kept rescuing those dogs.”
Does anyone doubt that a desperate Barack Obama will utilize Romney’s soiled dog if it gets two or three votes from dog owners? Anybody?
We’re sure Barack Obama is already thinking that if Michelle Obama somehow gets herself impregnated that might help him get some votes. But that is a gruesome task few want to take on, let alone Barack. So the default emotional pull for the Obama 2012 campaign will be to remind everyone of Romney’s dog. Please spare us that horror Republican primary voters.”
Well Bo, Republicans have for all intents and purposes nominated Mitt Romney to run against your horrid master. But then yesterday the Mitt Romney campaign did a great thing for dogs. Mitt Romney’s campaign warned all our furry friends, including you Bo, of the horror in the White House:
“Much has been made about Mitt Romney, in 1983, putting his family dog Seamus in a kennel on top of his roof and driving from Boston to Canada, with said canine Seamus making his displeasure known in a rather scatological way.
Democrats have signaled they have every intention of making sure the American people — especially dog-lovers — know the tale. In January, senior Obama campaign strategist David Axelrod tweeted a photo of the president and Bo in a car, with the snide observation: “@davidaxelrod: How loving owners transport their dogs.”
The Romney campaign signaled Tuesday night that they are not about to cede any ground when it comes to a candidate’s odd past with man’s best friend.
And the Obama campaign shot back, with a spokesman suggesting the Romney team was attacking a child, since the Obama act in question took place when he was a kid.
The Daily Caller noted that in President Obama’s best-selling memoir, “Dreams from My Father: A Story of Race and Inheritance,” the president recalls being fed dog meat as a young boy in Indonesia with his stepfather, Lolo Soetoro.”
That’s right Bo – Obama used to eat dog meat. In 2008 Obama bragged about how important the formative years, when he was ten years old, meant that he had foreign policy experience. Now we read that in his formative years Barack Obama ate your relatives Bo.
We’re worried for you Bo. Michelle, the one with the angry face, the perpetual scowl, could snap your leg bone with her lantern jaw like a matchstick. To Michelle and Barack you are the other white meat – and we are not discussing Louis Farrahkhan style white meat either. We are talking about our furry friends.
For a long time Bo, since 2007 we have had as the Big Pink catechism:
“Obama simply cannot be trusted. Obama cannot be trusted on any issue. Obama cannot be trusted by his friends. Obama cannot be trusted by his enemies. Obama cannot be trusted.”
We have written:
“Barack Obama’s seal of approval on “trust” is as worthless as the latest Oprah diet.”
We were writing then about the endless stream of Obama vacations and the corruptions and lies of the Obamas – Michelle and Barack. Now Bo, Barack Obama is attempting to bamboozle yet again by using the word “TRUST”:
“Trust” to Join “Fairness” as Obama Buzzword, Sources Say
If the White House gets its political way, “trust” will be a word President Obama and his surrogates use in the next few weeks as often as Obama has talked about “fairness,” and Mitt Romney, once dubbed as hollow to the core, will increasingly be ID’d as a card-carrying ultra-conservative who bobbles into Etch A Sketch moments because his core is causing him problems.
There are six words at the end of that last sentence that cry out for quote marks, but the deep-background rules imposed Monday at the White House preclude the use of direct quotes or identifying the three “senior administration officials” who sought to lead reporters into the next phase of the campaign as well as strategy for Congress’ return to Washington. [snip]
But if voters select the next president based on the state of the economy since 2009, the senior officials conceded that continued high unemployment and a slow recovery could complicate Obama’s plea that middle-class voters trust his vision for the economy in a second term.”