Update: Clear the decks! “CNN reports Perry to drop out today and will endorse Gingrich.” Good news for Newtie, right? Well yes, and just in time because “it has come to this”: Newt Gingrich’s ex-mistress/later to be wife/later replaced by the new mistress/wife is indignant and attacking her Newtie in an ABC interview.
Meanwhile “Gingrich blasts ABC for airing interview with ex-wife as ABC starts drip strategy“. Oy vey! As members of the now dead Democratic Party of FDR/Hillary Clinton we are interested in job performance and experience not the personal love lives of politicians and their mistresses and wives.
However, at some point someone has to ask Newtie why he impeached Bill Clinton’s penis when he was doing the same thing. Oh, right, yeah, it wasn’t about sex it was about the nonexistent perjury or the nonexistent lying or something.
Everything old is new again. Newt Gingrich has to explain his Clenis fixation as Speaker and why he did what he did while knowing what he was doing privately – in the same manner that Mitt Romney has to explain Bain and why he is so dull a personality. This is called vetting. [By the way, did you know that Bain executives contributed more to Obama Dimocrats than Republicans in the last 6 years?]
Of course we can all agree that Barack Obama was never vetted and the country continues to suffer daily from that (continuing) Big Media protection of the Boob. Speaking of Boobs, Jimmy Carter has joined the race-baiting hordes of Obama race-baiters. And HotAir did a “quotes of the day” companion piece to our own race-baiters extravaganza (below).
Everything old is new again.
Everything old is new again. The Obama campaign race-baiting against Hillary Clinton which crested during the South Carolina primary has been repeated big time against Republicans this year. Big Media is preparing to do its utmost to protect and preserve Barack Obama’s occupation of the White House. The dumb-asses at Occupy Wall Street prove once again that there is no fool like a left fool.
Everything old is new again. You remember when we wrote about “A Boob Abroad – A Dangerous Narcissist Lost At Sea“ and warned “Abandon Ship! The Captain Is A Boob“, right? Well, this is what happens when the Captain is a boob:
The Captain, we warned, is a treacherous boob. Don’t expect the Captain to be there when the Ship of State capsizes and sinks to the bottom of the sea. (see, for instance, the boob captain from Italy: Captain refuses to return to sinking Costa Concordia to help passengers evacuate). We’re not on a cruise but we are hitting the rocks because the Captain is a Boob.
Everything old is new again. We called out “Dumb White People” (featuring the sloven Hillary Hating Andrew Sullivan who urged Americans to vote for Obama because of the color of his skin) in March 2008. We called out “Dumb Black People“ (featuring Hillary Hating race-baiter James Clyburn and the dumb Obama Dimocrat who said “Who knew that the first black president would make it even harder on black people?”).
Ripping us off, Andrew Sullivan is arguing on the cover of Newsweek that it is Obama opponents who are dumb.
Andrew Sullivan a disgusting person at every level (google “milky loads” and “andrew sullivan”) who attacked Hillary Clinton and persists with the disproved theory that Sarah Palin did not give birth to Trig Palin. When Sarah Palin “tweeted” that Andrew Sullivan was a “conspiracy kook” the disgusting Andrew Sullivan replied that ” the Palin “tweet” had “made me come in my pants.”
Anyone who thinks there can be any “civility” with these people is not living in the real world. Our critics who think we should not fight fire with fire should rethink their position. We will continue to call out The Obamas at every level – personal and political - because personal and political attacks is what they order their minions to do then pretend they are the victims when those like us call them out and point out their personal and political flaws. WE DO NOT BELIEVE IN UNILATERAL DISARMAMENT. Fight fire, with fire.
Everything old is new again. Hillary Hating race-baiter Andrew Sullivan was not alone in this weeks race baiting festival. James Clyburn would have us believe that Rosa Parks was a total wimp and loser if we are to believe him that Mitt Romney (the totally non-threatening bowl of oatmeal Mitt Romney!) is reminiscent of racists who kept Rosa Parks in the back of the bus.
If Rosa Parks’ racist enemies were like Mitt Romney then that whole civil rights struggle is a joke. Rosa Parks was a courageous woman who dared to do something dramatic against great odds. James Clyburn demeans Rosa Parks in order to glorify Barack Obama. Race-baiting James Clyburn will use the same race-baiting tactics deployed against Bill and Hillary Clinton, to race-bait all Obama opponents:
Everything old is new again. More of the same race-baiting tactics deployed against Bill and Hillary Clinton in South Carolina, by Chris Matthews, now used against Republicans:
Gingrich used “Juan” in a condescending manner against Big Media Juan Williams in the same condescending manner he uses against other Big Media “personalities” white or black. But for Chris Matthews it’s all race-baiting all the time:
“That use of the name ‘Juan,’ the way he did it. You can’t argue these things. You either see them or you don’t. It’s just the way he did that. I sensed a little applause when he said ‘Let me help you’ when he answered the Juan question. It’s in the eye of the beholder. And, by the way, calling someone a racist is the worst way to get them to stop being racist because everyone gets defensive. … So it’s stupid to say it but, honestly, if you notice it, you sort of ought to blow the whistle. Because there is a dog whistle going on here.”
All that is old is new again. More race-baiting on behalf of Barack Obama:
“They urged African-Americans to re-elect President Barack Obama, and condemned voter identification laws they warned are meant to suppress black voter turnout in November.
At Ebenezer Baptist Church in Atlanta, where King preached from 1960 until his death in 1968, the Rev. Raphael G. Warnock accused GOP presidential candidate Newt Gingrich of using racial stereotypes to fire up Republican voters. On the campaign trail, Gingrich has referred to President Barack Obama as “the food stamp president” and earlier this month suggested that African-Americans seek paychecks instead of public assistance.
Warnock called Gingrich’s comments “sickening and insulting.”
At the South Carolina debate, the condescending Juan Williams tried to race-bait. Newt Gingrich (and our readers know we have never been and will never be fans of the Newt) fought back in a glorious way against the race-baiting:
“I know among the political elites you’re not supposed to use facts that are uncomfortable.”
Hillary Clinton supporters easily recall and recoil at the race-baiting by Obama, in between the gay-bashing by Obama, in South Carolina. There was a debate sponsored by the Congressional Black Caucus on Martin Luther King day. We called it the “Best Debate Ever“:
“The difference between words and actions.”
That never-to-be-forgotten debate (the first and only mention of Rezko by Hillary Clinton was in that debate – watch the video) was forgotten by Dick Harpootlian, Chairman of the Obama South Carolina Dimocratic Party. Unfortunately for Harpootlian he was harpooned by Bill O’Reilly when Harpootlian began the Obama race-bait tactics:
Earlier Harpootlian and Sharpton race-baiting on MSNBC with all the joy exhibited when Sharpton and Clyburn race baited Hillary Clinton:
“The Republicans are scheduling their debate [for] Monday, Martin Luther King Day, without any regard, whatsoever, [for] the civil rights issues that this state has faced,” Harpootlian added.
What does Harpootlian think the current frontrunner and former governor of Massachusetts Mitt Romney should do?
“[Romney should say] ‘no, I don‘t want to have a debate on Martin Luther King’s birthday, that’s a day we need to celebrate a great American leader,’” Harpootlian said.
The Jokers were wild on the Sharpton show on behalf of the greatest Joker of them all.
* * * * *
Everything old is new again. Yesterday the nearly defunct, certainly moribund Occupy Wall Street circus held it’s Winter festival called “Occupy Congress.” This long planned occupation was a total flop. Thousands upon thousands were expected and planned for. A few motley hundreds showed up.
But the numbers are not why we condemn and mock these Occupy Wall Street clowns. From the beginning we stated that as long as Occupy Wall Street did not protest Barack Obama directly and in a focused manner we could not take them seriously and indeed we denounce them as a phony front group created to assist Obama’s election.
As much as we have mocked the phony left (PINOs) such as Occupy Wall Street it is their actions which mock them the best. Yesterday as they dripped by the tens into Washington a remarkable announcement was made by Barack Obama’s corrupt minions: The Super-president is to accept his nomination at a larger venue befitting his awesomeness:
“And so it came to be that the party of “the 99 percent,” whose newest rock star is class warrior Elizabeth Warren, is holding O’s big speech in a stadium named after a bank so that they can milk their rich donors for a few more luxury dollars. Says Guy Benson, noting that BofA is also the same bank that nearly ended up imposing a debit-card fee to cope with new Democratic regulations, “The irony, hypocrisy, and off-the-charts self regard couldn’t be any more evident.” And it ain’t just Republicans who think so
This hypocrisy has to be denounced by Elizabeth Warren or else Scott Brown is going to have a well deserved field day painting her as a hypocrite. Of course Warren is just another victim of Obama’s needs. But why oh why Bank of America Stadium. Is it to mock Occupy Wall Street? Is it to proudly march in the 1% parade? Is it to come out of the closet as a dupe of Wall Street and a toady of Big Banks? It’s about Barack Obama and Barack Obama’s priorities:
“On the final night of this fall’s Democratic National Convention, President Barack Obama will deliver his acceptance speech at Bank of America stadium, party sources told the Observer on Monday night.
Convention officials are expected to announce the venue this morning at a news conference at the stadium. Two party sources say the decision to use the stadium was made months ago. [snip]
Quoting sources involved in convention fundraising, Bloomberg said the move would allow officials, struggling to raise money, to sell skyboxes to donors. [snip]
Officials are trying to raise nearly $37 million under new Democratic Party rules that bar corporate or lobbyists’ contributions or donations over $100,000.
They’ve been offering packages with different levels of incentives, including VIP passes and choice hotel rooms. The stadium could offer more options. The sources said organizers began considering the stadium in early 2011, before fundraising began. [snip]
However, the choice of Bank of America stadium for the speech may give ammunition to critics of the bank, which received a federal bailout after the 2008 financial crisis and also angered consumers with a proposed, though later dropped, $5 monthly debit-card transaction fee.”
Occupy Wall Street/Occupy Congress was too busy masturbating, or whatever it is they do, to squeak anything about Obama at Bank of America Stadium.
Some Obama Dimocrats see the Bank of America Stadium Acceptance speech as the naked embarrassment of truth it is:
“The Democratic Party’s decision to move President Obama’s acceptance speech to the Bank of America Stadium in Charlotte has surprised some party activists — and stirred criticism — over the use of a venue named for a company that has been at the center of the financial crisis.
“God almighty, I can’t believe it.” said one top Democratic fundraiser when he learned of the decision to move the speech to Bank of America stadium, where the NFL Carolina Panthers play their football games. “This is an amateur’s mistake.” [snip]
But party officials privately confirmed that the move can help with fundraising despite what one called “an obvious optics” problem. And the use of a stadium — whose naming rights belong to a bank that has been engulfed in controversies over foreclosures, bank fees and bailouts — was denounced by some watchdog groups.
“It’s a surprising and disappointing choice,” said Mary Boyle, vice president of Common Cause. “Bank of America is the poster child for corporate greed and corporations out-of-control. The president would be better served by choosing a large public space with no corporate logo attached to it.”
Robert Weissman, president of Public Citizen, a group that lobbies against corporate influence, added: “Speaking at a stadium named for one of the financial firms that plunged our country into deep recession, we can only hope that Barack Obama will counter the optics by laying out a meaningful plan to control the Wall Street giants.” . [snip]
Suzi Emmerling, a spokeswoman for the host committee, confirmed a Bloomberg report that those deals — presented to Washington lobbyists last month — include an escalating menu of packages starting with the $1 million “presidential” level. Those who buy in will receive a “premier uptown hotel room,” a “platinum events package and “concierge services.” Another $500,000 “Gold Rush” level includes hotel room, credentials and a “premiere events package.”
Democratic officials have emphasized for months that this year’s convention won’t accept money from lobbyists and corporations. [snip]
But those seemingly strict rules appear to have some loopholes. While the convention committee itself won’t accept cash donations from corporations, it is taking “in kind” contributions from corporations, such as food, beverages, and equipment — costs that can often add up into the millions.
A separate convention “Hospitality” committee — operating under the name New American City Foundation — is also directly accepting corporate and lobbyists’ money to pay for the parties and other events that are often attended en masse by delegates, members of Congress and reporters.
In addition, the host committee itself is still accepting big donations of up to $100,000 a piece. “Nobody gets to rent a skybox for a million dollars,” said Emmerling.”
Occupy Wall Street was in Washington but their heads are in the sand. Instead of protesting Bank of Obama, they were playing drums and smoking from bongs.
While in Washington an Occupy Wall Street/Occupy Congress clown was arrested for assaulting a police officer.
Occupy Wall Street has been morally bankrupt from the beginning. Is it any wonder that “Occupy Wall Street—the movement built on protesting corporate greed and income inequality—is running out of money.” The $700,000 they raised and a small elite group controls has been squandered.
For those who think we are too harsh on the Occupy Wall Street trust fund babies, consider the contempt with which Barack Obama, Nancy Pelosi and other “supporters” welcomed Occupy Congress.
As Occupy Wall Street/Occupy Congress drifted into Washington, The Hill posted an article “Obama warns left: You won’t like budget”:
“Top White House officials are warning liberal and labor leaders to brace themselves for President Obama’s budget proposal.”
Again, silence from Occupy Wall Street Obama fans. Everything old is new again.
Bank of Obama, a budget warning released on Occupy Congress’s event-less day, and Nancy’s final insult to Occupy Wall Street’s manipulated and used dupes - Pelosi: Actually, we don’t have much of a connection to Occupy Wall Street. Bank of America and Pelosi – the perfect bookends to a day filling with nothing, from the phony left that will suffer every insult from its golden calf, Barack Obama.
Obama? He’s going to Disney Land.