This is not about lantern-jawed, muscular, scowling, automotive parts wearing, sleeveless, Michelle Obama. We’re talking about Barack Obama. Does Barack Obama have testicles – or is he smooth formed, like a Disney cartoon fawn?
We don’t ask because we dream of seeing tiny, malformed, pitted, orbs. We have no desire (ugh, quite the contrary) to see or picture in our minds the commander-in-briefs (unlike Judith Warner who while at the New York Times published cravings for Obama sex) all wee-wee’d down.
Obama on top reminds us of the nasty, but likely accurate gossip, about J.M. Barrie. Barrie of course is the author of the story of the lost boys and Peter Pan – “the boy who wouldn’t grow up”. Although Barrie was homosexual the times were sufficiently cruel that he entered into a marriage with actress Mary Ansell. The marriage was unconsummated. The joke was that Barrie was “the boy who wouldn’t go up.”
Watching Barack Obama fumble with the Libya zipper is as anti-climatic as poor Mary Ansell on her wedding night and as frustrating as Barrie must have felt knowing that he could not publicly love or wed his heart’s desire. Watching Hillary Clinton in action these past weeks brings about these bawdy ruminations. Hillary Clinton looks every inch a commander-in-chief while Obama… Could America possibly have a more flaccid leader on top?
Of course, Big Pink declaring Hillary Clinton appears presidential is not exactly breaking news. But the other night even Sean Hannity said the same thing about Hillary Clinton – at least in comparison to the Mess-iah. Perhaps the advice we have been giving is finally taking hold in Republican/conservative precincts and they are finally keeping the focus on Obama and not letting the Hillary “I over E” Hate distract them (likewise our disagreements with Republicans/conservatives should not distract us from getting rid of Obama).
Now look at this picture called “Commanderinchief”:
The picture originated with someone called “Slu” and appeared at the most-definitely-not-a-Hillary-Clinton-fansite, Ace of Spades. This is what DrewM wrote there before Hillary appeared in front of TV cameras to announce the latest developments in the “Kinetic Military Action”:
“President, er, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton will brief shortly. It’s really shameless how Obama has hidden from this mess. He’s not addressed the nation as Presidents do when they send troops into battle. He’s spokesman won’t do an on-camera briefing and for the most part the military and not political officials are the face of this.”
Americans are aware that Obama, unlike his mother, does not know much about doorknobs. Americans increasingly know that Obama lacks the… fortitude required to lead. Reuters:
“Only 17 percent of Americans see President Barack Obama as a strong and decisive military leader, according to a Reuters/Ipsos poll taken after the United States and its allies began bombing Libya.
Nearly half of those polled view Obama as a cautious and consultative commander-in-chief and more than a third see him as indecisive in military matters.
Obama was widely criticized in 2009 for his months-long consultations with senior aides and military chiefs on whether to send more troops to Afghanistan. Critics called it dithering, but he said such a big decision required careful deliberation. He eventually dispatched 30,000 more troops.”
Americans vaguely remember how during the Afghanistan dithering Obama’s many months long dithering on a selection of a dog became a point of comparison – which boobery was greater we all wondered.
The boobery, like a Japanese Tsunami, is washing over the American landscape. Even the Obama loving Hollywood bars and drugstores filled with comedians are drowning in the reality that there is a boob in charge. Jimmy Fallon made the case very well to a fawn-crotch licking Brian Williams of NBC:
The comedian made some very lucid and serious observations. The NBC News propagandist made defenses of the indefensible along with jokes about ‘tude.
Fallon noted that Obama was playing sports and that it was Hillary Clinton that was “stepping up.” Brian Williams made the irrelevant observation that Obama has phones on Air Force One and can communicate with the world. It does not occur to Brian Williams that Obama should have been at the White House when he sent women and men into harm’s way. Why didn’t Obama use those very phones to electronically visit with Brazil, Chile, and El Salvador and stay home to show what his priorities are? Sadly, Obama did show what his priorities are – speeches and crowds and publicity stunts and Who Gives A Crap? about war and peace, life and death.
Dumb White People like slimy Andrew Sullivan hated Hillary Clinton and loved Obama’s “face”. Remember? It was the gay version of Judith Warner pining for an après-midi with a fawn. Sullivan is not so out of love with Barack Obama that he cannot squirt his full hate on Hillary Clinton:
“Moreover, the fact that this is clearly the Clintons’ war – egged on by Bill, pushed through by Hillary – could exacerbate tensions between the two primary rivals. After all, why did Democrats vote for Obama over Clinton? In part because they specifically wanted less war, not more; and Clinton has never seen a war she didn’t support. Her consistency from Iraq to Libya places her closer to McCain than Obama. Things are at a very early stage as the bombing begins, and these are provisional worries. But unless something miraculous happens quickly, I see this as a lose-lose proposition for the president.
And the initial optics are terrible. A president solemnly sends America’s troops into action and then spirits off to Brazil to talk about jobs. How often does a president announce a war at 2 pm so he can catch a flight out of the country? And as public doubts and fears multiply, the president will be in a foreign country thousands of miles away. This is recklessness on a Bush-Cheney level.”
We’ve made it clear that we agree with Hillary Clinton (and we love that ovarian take charge ‘tude Brian) and the need for intervention in Libya. We do not support the intervention for doe-eyed “humanitarian” reasons. We believe it is in America’s interest to do so. Just as we explained during the Egypt crisis, American interests must be the determining factor in what America does.
In Egypt our concern was that as corrupt and bad as Mubarak was he still was an ally (a very horrible ally especially when it the topic was women – check out the “virginity checks”). We feared the Iron Veil and urged caution. Today the New York Times confirms what we feared about the Iron Veil and the Muslim Brotherhood gaining strength in Egypt.
In Libya we believe in maximum punishment with minimum costs because Quadaffy was not an ally and the situation will at worse go from bad to bad (in Egypt it could have gone from bad to worse). Our worldview holds for Syria and Iran as well – maximum punishment/minimum costs.
In our view intervention in Libya is a good idea as long as it is executed well and in full compliance with the law. Barack Obama has utterly failed on both counts. As we previously wrote Impeach away. Dissent is Patriotic and NOT RACIST. As we have frequently written “Elect a boob, expect boobery.”
As bad as the Andrew Sullivan festival of Clinton Hate was, the premier PINO magazine was even worse. The Nation celebrated sexism and misogyny with “Obama’s Women Pushed War Against Libya”:
“So three or four of Obama’s advisers, all women, wanted war against Libya.
We’d like to think that women in power would somehow be less pro-war, but in the Obama administration at least it appears that the bellicosity is worst among Hillary Clinton, Susan Rice and Samantha Power. All three are liberal interventionists, and all three seem to believe that when the United States exercises military force it has some profound, moral, life-saving character to it. Far from it. Unless President Obama’s better instincts manage to reign in his warrior women—and happily, there’s a chance of that—the United States could find itself engaged in open war in Libya, and soon. The troika pushed Obama into accepting the demands of neoconservatives, such as Joe Lieberman, John McCain and The Weekly Standard’s Bill Kristol, along with various other liberal interventionists outside the administration, such as John Kerry. The rode roughshod over the realists in the administration. [snip]
Similarly, the Washington Post reports that yet another administration woman, Gayle Smith, joined Ben Rhodes and the troika of other women to push for war:
Bros before hos, Uncle Dookie, bros before hos. It’s one of the reasons we on occasion cheer on Sarah Palin. When Bill Maher called her a “twat” Sarah Palin responded and explained why she responds to Big Media attacks on her:
“When it comes to responding to the media, the standard warning is: Don’t pick a fight with people who buy ink by the barrel because calling out the media and holding them accountable is a risky endeavor. Too often the first instinct is to ignore blatant media bias, crudeness, and outright lies, and just hope the media instigator will grow up and provide fairer coverage if you bite your tongue and not challenge the false reporting of an openly hostile press. But I’ve never bought into that. That’s waving the white flag. I just can’t do it because I have too much respect for the importance of a free press as a cornerstone of our democracy, and I have great respect for the men and women in uniform who sacrifice so much to defend that First Amendment right. Media, with freedom comes responsibility.”
Hate Palin’s policies all you want, but she hits back and we like that. She’s got ovaries.
Obama does not have the Ovaries needed for the job. Obama does not know what he is doing. Obama cannot explain what he is doing because the collective weight of lies would break the strongest of TelePrompTers. He does not know how to wage war because he lacks the ovaries to do so. Obama’s singular domestic scam has failed and even his most dead-ender supporters know it.
Obama not only does not know what he is doing, he does not have the testicular or ovarian fortitude to do what needs to be done in the way that it must be done. Testicles? No, he has none. Perhaps the testicles are hidden away along with the birth certificate that Donald Trump (and many Americans) wants to see.
Hillary Clinton has ovarian fortitude. Sarah Palin has ovarian fortitude. Know who else had ovarian fortitude? Guess. Hint, she just died at the age of 79. She had ovarian fortitude we did not know about. Did you know that Elizabeth Taylor offered to be a hostage in exchange for the Jewish hostages held by terrorists at Entebbe? Ovaries, baby.
Obama does not have the ovaries necessary to be president. Obama does not have the testicles necessary to be president. What Obama has is a lot of gall in ever running for president.