Which is worse “racist!” or “child molester!”?
We were repeatedly told by Big Media that Barack Obama ran a wonderful campaign and Hillary Clinton a miserable campaign in 2008. But which campaign won 40 point margins with less money while fighting the entire party apparatus and all of Big Media? Which campaign was completely unprepared for the Jeremiah Wright revelations and the Rezko corruptions? Which campaign had a candidate who with grace and intelligence could speak brilliantly at any event on any issue? Which campaign had a candidate who repeatedly made comments (think “bitter” and “clinging”) which were unacceptable? Who is it that needs a TelePromTer to say ‘good morning” or “happy birthday”?
Bill Clinton was called a “racist”. Hillary Clinton was accused of inciting an assassination of Barack Obama. Hillary Clinton supporters were called “racists” too. These narratives, among others (think “dynasty”) instigated by the Obama campaign were repeated by Big Media over and over again to such an extent that the fairest and most balanced news outlet, comparatively speaking, was the Hillary hating Fox News.
What happened in 2008 was a Big Media Political Party which supported a candidate and trashed anyone (Hillary or McCain) who opposed him. When Obama made a mistake Big Media excused or ignored it. When Obama lied Big Media applauded him as a truth teller. But if Hillary or McCain made even the slightest comment which could be exploited Big Media trashed them up and down.
Over the years we have provided evidence to substantiate all of the above. When the existence of JournoList was confirmed it was clear that corrupt bastards on JournoList purposefully killed the Jeremiah Wright story and purposefully built up the Obama “race” speech even though that speech raised more questions and certainly did not address the issue of Obama for 20 years worshiping at Wright’s pulpit.
Now from Alaska, with the benefit of a recording, we have further proof of Big Media corruption and candidate selection. Sister Sarah makes the case against the corrupt bastards:
“Just last night it was revealed that the rally that I had for Joe Miller on Thursday, it was revealed and we have the tape to prove it, that the CBS reporters, the affiliate in Alaska, conspired to make up stories about Joe Miller. We have the tape Chris, and I can’t wait until it busts out all over the nation, that shows what it is that we… kinda what I put up with for two years now from the media… but what Joe Miller is faced with in someone like Lisa Murkowsky who feels so entitled to that seat, that she and some of her people including some complicit in the media will do anything, they will stop at nothing, to allow Lisa Murkowsky to get back elected.”
I am saying that we have on tape the CBS reporters in the affiliate up there in Alaska saying, “Let’s find a child molester in the crowd as a supporter of Joe Miller. Let’s blast that. Let’s concoct a Rand Paul moment there. Let’s find any kind of chaos so we can tweet, “Ooh, there’s chaos. Joe Miller got punched.”” That’s sick. Those are corrupt bastards, Chris.”
Is “corrupt bastards” too harsh? No, it’s too kind. Hillary Supporters can easily hear the same conversation in the same newsrooms targeting Hillary. This time it is Joe Miller and all Americans should be grateful that he’s got a recording:
“FEMALE REPORTER: That’s up to you because you’re the expert, but that’s what I would
do…I’d wait until you see who showed up because that indicates we already know
FEMALE REPORTER: Child molesters…
MALE REPORTER: Oh yeah… can you repeat Joe Miller’s…uh… list of people, campaign
workers, which one’s the molester?
FEMALE VOICE: We know that out of all the people that will show up tonight, at least one of
them will be a registered sex offender.
MALE REPORTER: You have to find that one person…
FEMALE REPORTER: And the one thing we can do is ….we won’t know….we won’t know but
if there is any sort of chaos whatsoever we can put out a twitter/facebook alert: saying what
the… ‘Hey Joe Miller punched at rally.’
FEMALE REPORTER: Kinda like Rand Paul…I like that.
FEMALE REPORTER: That’s a good one.”
The corrupt bastards stand by their corruptions. Corrupt JournoListers like Greg Sargent continue to defend their fellow corrupt bastards. The corrupt bastards protect the corrupt bastards. JournoLister Ben Smith posted the defense of the corrupt bastards which amounts to ‘what you heard is not what you heard, what we said is not what we meant, our fabricated agit-prop was not meant to be public.”
There is a reason why Miller’s campaign is getting targeted with the “child molester” smear. It’s the type of smear you can’t wash off, you can’t explain, and it will come back to haunt you in future years. Like the “racist” smear the “child molester” smear can never be washed off and it is so open to interpretation and so incendiary that it will quickly embed itself into the collective consciousness.
Years from now, Joe Miller will say or do or vote for or against something and there will be a whisper of “child molester” even though there is no allegation in any way of any inappropriate behavior by Joe Miller. All people will remember is “child molester” and they will forget the context and that Joe Miller was the victim of a smear. Forever and ever Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton and Hillary Supporters of all colors will hear “racist” whispered in the background. We saw how that whisper campaign works this past week in Florida between good friends Bill Clinton and Kendrick Meek.
“This week, it is reported that Bill Clinton pushed black Democratic Rep. Kendrick Meek (Fla.) to quit his race against Independent Charlie Crist in Florida, when Obama and Vice President Joe Biden were stumping for Meek just a week before.”
Notice how slimy Quigley strongly suggests that racist Bill Clinton is trying to get the black guy out while Barack Obama is trying to help Meek. The truth, as we wrote, is entirely the opposite. It was Bill Clinton who forced Obama to campaign for Meek and it is Bill Clinton who has the long history of helping African-Americans and Barack Obama who has the history of selling out and stabbing in the back African-Americans (see Alice Palmer and Obama friend Tony Rezko who tormented his black tenants in Chicago). But the stink of “racist” is deployed because it sticks. Joe Miller is the victim of “child molester” because “child molester” is the brother smear to “racist” when there are no racial angles to exploit.
Another aspect to the Quigly slime is the garish hate towards the white working class:
“Obama unfortunately appeared to reflexively weigh in on behalf of Harvard Yard instead of Fenway Park. Obama is without question Harvard’s current favorite. Indeed, the idolatry of Mile High Stadium that has waned in the world at large still reigns at cloistered Harvard. And those little “I miss Bill” bumper stickers of Harvard’s dowagers are beginning to peel off.
But this is breaking the Democrats in half. The Clintons do not like Obama. They think they should be speaking to the minions at Mile High stadium. Now Harvard’s James Kloppenberg tells The New York Times that there is a primal difference between Bill Clinton and Barack Obama. Kloppenberg disparages the “vulgar pragmatism” of that hunka hunka burnin’ love that is Bill. He praises Obama’s “philosophical pragmatism.”
It is pretentious, but probably correct. Obama, like JFK, is high-minded, and I think there will be more to him next year with Elizabeth Warren on board, especially if he brings in Arnold Schwarzenegger after December. And they will need a new trickster. Arnold, in a recent interview with Diane Sawyer, seemed to want to go. Clinton is vulgar, and a vulgarian with 50 gold watches has populist cachet, in the tradition of the old Irish pols of Brooklyn and Southie with drink and cigar in hand, diamond tie pins and a new Cadillac every year. That is one of the things his followers liked about him.
I have never liked Bill Clinton, not because he is vulgar….”
What we see so vividly is the undiluted hate of the “creative class” against the white working class. The black pimp easily translates to the white Irish politician. Blacks cannot be attacked but the white working class is targeted with all the venom vocabulary good education and profound stupidity can provide. This Quigley creep uses every stereotype of the Irish as “white niggers”. That’s what the Bill Clinton’s used to be “white niggers”:
“Other 19th century commentators also compared conditions of the Irish and enslaved African-Americans. A French traveler to both America and Ireland reported that “I have seen the Indian in his forests and the Negro in his chains, and thought, as I contemplated their pitiable condition, that I saw the very extreme of human wretchedness; but I did not then know the condition of unfortunate Ireland.” Indeed, slaves in the United States had longer life expectancy (36 years) than Irish peasants (19 years), and better diets and superior living conditions. There is no need, however, to set up a competition in relative rates of such horrendous suffering, and the aspects in which Blacks were better treated presumably derive from their involuntary status as valuable property rather than from any supposed humanitarianism of their owners. The point is rather the extraordinary oppression of both groups. Irish immigrants to America were referred to as “White Niggers.”
Both groups were targets of racist stereotypes that usually drew on a debased Darwinism in which both Blacks and Irish were somehow nearer to apes than were Anglo-Saxon types. An illustration from the influential American magazine Harper’s Weekly (whose subtitle “Journal of Civilization” sounds ironic a century later) shows an alleged similarity between “Irish Iberian” and “Negro” features in contrast to the higher “Anglo-Teutonic.” The accompanying caption indicates that the so-called Iberians were “believed to have been” an African race that invaded first Spain and then, apparently, Ireland, where they intermarried with native savages and “thus made way…for superior races” (like the English) to rule over them.
After the Civil War, prejudice was worse against Blacks in the South and against Irish in the North. No less an authority on discrimination than W.E.B. DuBois recalled that in growing up in Great Barrington, Massachusetts, in the 1870s, “the racial angle was more clearly defined against the Irish than against me.”
There is an atavistic reason why Bill Clinton was called the “first Black president”. All the class hatred came to the fore and all the anti white working class hate came to the fore and the best way to express that oddity was the “first Black president”. But the reason for the hatred from the well educated “creative class” types was because Bill Clinton was the “first White Nigger President”.
Quigley’s hatred of the white working class and the Clintons quickly morphs into what is the great fear of Barack Obama and his army of well educated race-baiters and bigots:
“There is still time for the Clintons to destroy the Democratic Party, and in such a volatile political environment, there is potentially time for them to destroy the post-war political system.”
The Democratic Party destroyed itself when it force fed the rank and file an unqualified, inexperienced, buffoon from Chicago. What Quigly fears is a return to the post-war political system and the coalition of FDR which included the white working class. What Quigly fears is the destruction of the Obama Dimocratic Party. Quigly is right to fear. We intend to destroy the Obama Dimocratic Party and resurrect the Democratic Party which put people first and fought for principle and core Democratic values.
And we are not alone. The wounds of 2008 are fresh, disgorging blood. After the November 2010 elections the wounds will spew more blood – rivers of blood. Hillary Supporters are still angry and we don’t just mean those of us online. Hillary Clinton supporters say “dump Obama”:
“Democratic voters are closely divided over whether President Barack Obama should be challenged within the party for a second term in 2012, an Associated Press-Knowledge Networks Poll finds.
That glum assessment carries over into the nation at large, which is similarly divided over whether Obama should be a one-term president. [snip]
The AP-KN poll has tracked a group of people and their views since the beginning of the 2008 presidential campaign. Among all 2008 voters, 51 percent say he deserves to be defeated in November 2012 while 47 percent support his re-election _ essentially a tie.
Among Democrats, 47 percent say Obama should be challenged for the 2012 nomination and 51 percent say he should not be opposed. Those favoring a contest include most who backed Hillary Rodham Clinton’s unsuccessful faceoff against Obama for the 2008 nomination.”
All the propaganda from Big Media that the wounds of 2008 are healed are attempts to marginalize us. Republicans who do not understand the importance and endurance of this divide hurt themselves. How’s this for understatement by AP:
Even so, the poll illustrates how Obama’s reputation has frayed since 2008. It suggests lingering bad feelings from Democrats’ bitter primary fight, when he and Clinton _ now his secretary of state _ roughly split the popular vote. Political professionals of both parties said the findings are a warning for the president, whose formal re-election effort is expected to begin stirring next year.”
All the Hillary Clinton as Obama’s vice president is somehow meant to assauge us. We don’t care if Hillary Clinton runs as Obama’s vice president, Bill Clinton becomes the Secretary of State and Chelsea Clinton is named the Defense Secretary and Marc Mezvinsky is the Treasury Secretary and Hillary Clinton’s mom is appointed as White House Chief of Staff – we will never support Barack Obama.
“”Nobody wants to work with this guy,” said Steven Fagin, 45, of Cincinnati. A Democrat and 2008 Obama voter, he cited deep divisions between Democrats and Republicans. “We’re never going to get anything done.”
At Barack Obama’s final rally today the empty seats numbered into the thousands. Those empty seats are the ones in past election years we occupied. The unused phone banks are the ones we used to call from. The unvisited houses are the ones we used to canvass. The not motivated voters are the neighbors we used to walk with to the ballot box.
“Hey you Obots, you hippy punchers, you nasty, sexist, snooty, self described “creative class” Obama supporters who pushed us under the bus in 2008 because *you* didn’t need us anymore. You’ve spent the last couple of years pushing the rest of the working class over to the Tea Party with your condescending ridicule of Sarah Palin and your accusations of racism. How’s that strategy working for you? [snip]
Good luck on Tuesday because the working class, uneducated, menopausal, bitter, gun toting women and men you blew off and called racists are going to pick themselves up and toss you under the bus- in front of a speeding train.”
Like Russian peasants against an exterminating horde we will scorch the earth and burn our own homes in this fight. We will never surrender. We have never been beaten. We have never agreed to an armistice. We will beat you on November 2, 2010. We will beat Obana on election day 2012. We will never ever forget Obama treachery in 2008. We will never accept the new order.
We will never accept the Obama Dimocratic Party. Never.