Time for us to “cackle”. The first in our series of articles “Obama Is The Third Bush Term” was published on November 13, 2008 – less than a week after the November 2008 elections (don’t miss our pictorial representation of “Obama is the Third Bush Term” on the lower right hand column). This week Obama thug Robert Gibbs lost his mind over that one.
“Culture of Corruption”? We began to expose the Obama Dimocrat “Culture of Corruption” before Michelle Malkin even dreamed of her book (see, June 2, 2008’s “The Democratic? Party Fractures; see, June 4, 2008’s “Rezko Convicted – Culture Of Corruption – Barack Obama“; see July 2, 2008’s “Barack Obama’s Chicago Culture Of Corruption” as examples).
We hit the bulls-eye with those prescient evaluations. But only now are the Hopium Guzzlers beginning to understand how right we have been with this: “The antidote to the poison which is Barack Obama is devastating defeat for his drone Dimocrats.”
When we wrote “Tough Times Ahead For Hillary Clinton Supporters” the central thesis of our argument was resisted. We argued that
“The tough times will come because in order to do what is best for the country and to resurrect the now dead Democratic Party of FDR and Hillary Clinton we will have to assist in the destruction of the Obama Dimocratic Party.
Lifelong Democrats will find the purposeful destruction of a party disguised as the Democratic Party a difficult decision to make. [snip]
We still believe that in order to bring sanity to the process we must make sure that the Obama Dimocratic Party suffers devastating defeat in election after election after election.“
The resistance to our strategy of doom, destruction, defeat was a misguided call to think first of “the issues” and “principles”. Our response was “what principles? – Obama has no principles other than self-agrandizement”. We asked a devastating question:
“The argument is we must support Dimocrats who stabbed us in the back. Where does that get us? Where has that argument gotten the Nutroots?”
We now have an answer from the Nutroots. The very same answer the PUMA movement came up with in 2008, the very same answer we gave in 2008, is now dawning on the “creative class” Nutroots. Here is what happened, courtesy of JournoLister Ben Smith:
“A prominent progressive who backed Obama early doesn’t buy my theory that the White House’s attitude toward the “professional left” comes from a sense that Obama won Iowa without its help.
But after Iowa, from the vantage point of Gibbs and others who had begun two years earlier, was very late in the game. If you were with Obama before Iowa, you were making an investment. If you were there after Iowa, you were jumping on the bandwagon, going with the front-runner. You would still incur gratitude — but the risk you were taking just wasn’t the same.
My correspondent furiously e-mails:
F*** them. We were with them pretty damn early on, and they still treated us like sh**, after they used us, and then came back and begged for more help when the going got tough in September. [Economist Joe] Stiglitz was with them from the beginning, and they treated him like sh**. So, with all due respect, f*** them. This isn’t about them not liking people who came late to the ball game. It’s about the smartest people in the world and the smartest candidate in the world thinking they don’t need anyone’s help, because they’re just so much damn better than everyone else, and thinking they did it all without anyone’s help. They need some serious come-uppance or we’re all f***ed.“
That “prominent progressive” Hopium Guzzler, now gets it. They need some serious come-uppance or we’re all f***ed. Only now does he understand what we said for so long. The only way to deal with thugs, Obama thugs, Chicago thugs, is to punch them in the face. No words just punch them in the face. F**k ’em.
Hillary used the more polite “Deck’Em”. But we will be much more blunt, just like that idiot “prominent progressive” – F**k ’em. F**k You Barack Obama. (we use the asterisk version due to internet censorship programs which would block our site if we used the full word – but we mean the full “uc” version of the word. “F**k You Barack Obama”.)
“They need some serious come-uppance or we’re all f***ed.” is another way of saying “doom, destruction, defeat” for Obama Dimocrats and Obama in November 2010 and 2012 and on and on until every vestige of the Obama corruption is purged from American life.
Earlier this year we compared Barack Obama to fecal matter on a fine dinner. In that same article we addressed the many Hillary VP rumors. An extended excerpt of “Let’s Boo Hillary Clinton” follows which addresses some of the Hillary rumors (we’ll have a full series of articles on Hillary strategy for 2010/2012 coming soon) and the need and reasons for “doom, destruction, defeat”:
“That is as elegant/inelegant a way to say that not even the lovely Hillary Clinton could induce us to vote for Barack Obama. We write this because of all the gushing speculation lately that Hillary Clinton might replace Joe Biden and rescue Barack Obama in 2012.
Mess-iah Barack Obama needs a Savior and that Savior is Hillary Clinton. The Hope and Change is to dump Biden and beg Hillary to become Obama’s VP.
In 2008 we occasionally stated that an Obama/Hillary ticket would be perhaps difficult for us in the same way that a child might have an unsavory dinner vs luscious dessert moment. “Eat your vegetables and you can have your favorite dessert.”
No longer. Barack Obama is not a personality issue. True, here at Big Pink, Obama’s nasty self, his snubs, his self-worship and self-love, his Joker face, his head shape, his lanky akimbo self, the very air he breathes, his stinkiness which we can smell through the television – we have grown to dislike Obama personally. But as we have repeatedly written it is Obama and Obamaism that must be defeated, and defeated without mercy and without doubt.
“The person singularly responsible for these catastrophes and the policy singularly responsible is Obama and Obamaism.”
It is not only Barack Obama who must be defeated. Obama’s politics of division “situation comedy coalition” must be defeated and the Democratic Party resurrected and restored.
Now some Democrats are so disgusted, some newly minted Independents are so disgusted, many Republicans are so disgusted that their response is to say that they just want the Obama Dimocratic Party to die and that every Dimocratic elected official should be politically killed, – they never want to have anything to do with, ever again, with or for the Democratic or Dimocratic Party or anything it stands for, has ever stood for, or will ever stand for. We understand that level of disgust.
However, America needs the old Democratic Party. Republicans need the Democratic Party as it used to be before Barack Obama and his thugs so thoroughly trashed it, killed it, and replaced it with that monstrosity we dub the Obama Dimocratic Party.
As we have written before the Republican Party should be the party of the green eye-shade accountants always asking how much things cost and wanting America to either stay the same or go back to an earlier and mythical easier time. The Democratic Party, as it used to be, should be the party that wants to change things – for the better – and wants to move to the future.
The modern Republican Party, in other words, should be the stern “Daddy Party” of stereotypical fastidiousness, frugality, conservatism and the status quo. The modern Democratic Party, in other words, should be the smiling “Mommy Party” of stereotypical freshness, generosity, and daring coupled with change for the better. That’s what the Founding Fathers and Mothers wanted – faction versus faction leading to good government from the clash of ideas.
The Democratic Party, once resurrected, must be for CHANGE. But, it must be CHANGE FOR THE BETTER. We wrote that over and over and over in 2007-2008 but the Hopium guzzlers wanted change for the better or the worse – we got worse with Barack Obama.”
* * * * * *
Regular Big Pink readers know our catechism, our mantra:
“Obama simply cannot be trusted. Obama cannot be trusted on any issue. Obama cannot be trusted by his friends. Obama cannot be trusted by his enemies. Obama cannot be trusted.“
They do not care and they do not care that you know they do not care.
When Gibbs attacked Obama supporters because he knows these fools will humiliate themselves further and vote for Obama and his corrupt Dimocrats he was letting them know that he does not care that they know he does not care. Later Gibbs made the point again when he refused to retract his statements.
“But if there was nervousness over base voters not heading to the polls, Gibbs didn’t show it.
“I don’t think [liberal voters won’t show up],” he said, “because I think what’s at stake in November is too important to do that.”
Its the same “red flag” politics we rejected in November 2008. When Obama needed votes from Hillary supporters and especially from women he began to wave the red flag on abortion rights and Supreme Court appointees. Now Gibbs makes the “red flag” politics obvious. To the Nutroots we say: They do not care and they do not care that you know they do not care.
When we rejected “red flag” politics and refused to give our votes to the corruption called Barack Obama many on the “professional left”, the “creative class” were angry with us. Now they know we are right but can’t quite bring themselves to say “Big Pink you have been right all along, please accept our totally abject apology, humiliate us all you wish… you were right and are right.” Our response on the day they say that: “F**k You!”
Thug Gibbs and corrupt Barack Obama believe this is still 2008. But as we noted yesterday, Obama and his Dimocratic corrupt clowns are in trouble. Even the Hopium Guzzlers on Huff n’ Puff know it’s not 2008 anymore:
“For all the chatter about the White House’s ability to get out the vote in Colorado’s Tuesday night primary, the election produced one statistic that could leave Democrats unsettled.
The losing candidate in the Republican race, former Lt. Gov Jane Norton, actually earned more votes (197,143) than the winning candidate in the Democratic primary, Sen. Michael Bennet (183,521).
A voting breakdown like that is troubling enough for the party. That it occurred in Colorado — a state targeted by the Obama presidential campaign and turned into a potential Democratic stronghold in 2008 — makes it slightly more frightening.”
It’s not 2008 anymore. When Michelle Obama paraded her cheap Chicago self through the streets of Marbella, Spain, in her Dolce Vita John Paul Gaultier Halloween Eurotrash outfit in her movie-stars-wear-these sunglasses she was telling economically distressed Americans “I don’t care and I don’t care that you know that I don’t care.” MoonOnPluto informs us today that Americans are saying to Michelle: “F**k You Michelle!”
“The number of Americans who have a positive opinion of First Lady Michelle Obama has fallen in the last 16 months, according to the new Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll. In April, 2009, 64 percent of those surveyed by the Journal/NBC said they had a positive impression of Mrs. Obama; today, the number is 50 percent. That 50 percent personal approval is just slightly above President Obama’s personal approval figure, which stands at 46 percent in the new poll.”
Obama Dimocrats are in trouble (“Recovery Summer” is “Relapse Summer” to most Americans not in Marbella) because they are not Democrats in the FDR/Hillary Clinton mold (check out the latest results from California to see how bad Obama Dimocrats will be beaten this November).
This November all Americans, Democrats and Republicans and Independents better say “F**k You Barack Obama! F**K You Michelle Obama! F**k You Obama Supporters!”
“They need some serious come-uppance or we’re all f***ed.”