As the NObama Coalition grows in numbers and strength, Obama’s treacheries surge to high tide. More and Americans abandon the Hopium dens and move to a posture of questioning Obama’s competence, character, and qualifications to be president. Those Americans who already questioned Obama’s competence, character and qualifications to be president move to our side of the equation and take our mantra to heart:
Obama simply cannot be trusted. Obama cannot be trusted on any issue. Obama cannot be trusted by his friends. Obama cannot be trusted by his enemies. Obama cannot be trusted.
Today we survey the current disasters swamping the Obama dingy and analyze how Obama will respond. So imperiled are Obama and his Hopium Guzzler Thugs that race-baiting, personal destruction, and Latino duping are on the table. Abandon all Hope – we’re going into Obama-land “mentality”.
* * * * * *
Lately, even the most Hopium guzzling Dimocratic elected officials realize that Obama is a treacherous thug from Chicago only interested in his own self-advancement. The Boy Raised By Wolves does not care about anyone but himself.
House Appropriations Chairman David Obey recently said, “There are so many members of our caucus who think that this administration is willing to use members of Congress as cannon fodder.”
After Robert Gibbs declared the House to be up for grabs this November, Hopium Guzzlers in Congress spoke up:
“The broadest impact of Gibbs’ comments is to make public the long simmering tensions between House Democrats and the White House. Some of this tension is, of course, inevitable since Obama is, ultimately, on a 2012 electoral calendar while House Democrats have only this November in mind.”
Obama only cares about his self-advancement and no one else. The most dim-witted in the House begin to realize this fact:
“Yet, at times, House Democrats have expressed concern that the White House is playing fast-and-loose with their majority in order to help Obama’s re-election efforts in 2012. Those fears were expressed at a meeting with White House political guru David Axelrod in April and have only grown more acute since that time.”
Obama only cares about his self-advancement and no one else. The U.S. Senate of 60 votes then 59 votes is already but a memory. After November it will be yet another reminder that Obama cannot be trusted, believed, or relied on. The great “Summer Recovery” tour demonstrates how out of touch Obama and his drum beaters are. Brad Ellsworth of Indiana who sold out the interests of his constituents in order to “Save Obama” by voting for the health scam will be one of the first drum beaters to go. In Indiana:
“Sixty percent favor repeal of ObamaCare, as do 56% of independents. Fifty-nine percent favor passage of an immigration-enforcement law in Indiana modeled on Arizona’s, and half of independents agree (while only 31% disagree).”
The House of Representatives won by the Republicans is almost a foregone conclusion. The Senate won by the Republicans is now a very real possible future and discussed by strategists of all stripes. Now James Carville is stating that Obama Dimocrats better start praying to a traditional deity, not the golden calf they worship:
As elected Dimocratic officials wake up to the knives coming at their backs at the hand of Obama, the most obsequious of servants, Greg Sargent, raises a crucial question for Obama Dimocrats – “How do you make Dems care about the midterms?“:
“The thinking among Dem strategists appears to be that once Dems realize the midterms are a “choice” election, rather than merely a referendum on Dems, they’ll go out and vote. But what if Dems do see this as a referendum on their party’s rule, and base their enthusiasm solely on whether they are energized by the Dem performance?
The thing about Gibbs’s “shocking” declaration is that the White House and Democrats have been engaged in a full-blown effort for weeks now to persuade voters that the midterm elections could represent a return to GOP rule.
The White House and Dems have made this case every which way: They’ve charged that Republicans will again rule as stooges of Big Oil and Wall Street. They’ve claimed that Republicans will rain a blizzard of subpoenas on the White House if they take control of Congress. They’ve framed the elections as a choice between the policies that got us into this mess and those that are getting us out of it. And so forth.
Yet rank and file Dems don’t appear to care that much. The latest polling shows that the “enthusiasm gap” remains the same, with Republicans far more excited about voting than Dems are. In other words, Dem scaremongering about the GOP takeover doesn’t yet appear to be revving up Dems to turn out this fall. [snip]
How do you make rank and file Dems care about the midterms? It’s unclear that yelling about how mean and nasty Republicans are is going to cut it.”
Obama Dimocrats are in for a deserved beating due to their arrogance and stupidity. These fools actually believed Obama when he declared himself lovable and a savior unto them in 2010 such that 1994 would not repeat itself. But Obama always was a clownish figure. Big Media coverage which praised his bad campaign as “brilliant” and savaged Hillary Clinton and John McCain’s campaign as evil and incompetent is unable to hide the turd any longer.
“Candidate Obama used to joke about rays of sunshine coming in when he started to speak. Now he brings the clouds. He’s spent a great deal of time talking about the Recovery Act and health care reform, but the political fortunes of those programs are dismal, which suggests his ability to persuade and change minds is seriously damaged.”
Why the great awakening among the most avid Obama acolytes? It’s called reality. Reality is starting to bite and even the most Obama smitten see the irresponsibility at the core of the boy raised by wolves:
“President Barack Obama has long boasted about the transformative change he’s bringing to the country.
But by the time those reforms finally arrive, he could be long gone from the White House.
Some of Obama’s biggest promises won’t go into effect until long after his first term — and in some cases, well past a second. In fact, buried deep within some of the Democrats’ most significant reform bills are dozens of policy time bombs set to blow at more politically convenient times.
The Democratic reform triumvirate — health care, Wall Street and energy — is filled with provisions designed to front-load policy benefits and delay political pain.
Health care reform cracks down on insurers right away but won’t force people to buy insurance until 2014. A new consumer financial protection agency kicks in almost immediately under the Wall Street reform bill, but banks won’t feel its full force for more than 10 years. And even Democrats’ nascent immigration reforms include at least an eight-year wait before illegal immigrants can apply for permanent residency — after Obama leaves office.
The delicate balance aims to gradually get a skittish public accustomed to the enormous changes, while insulating lawmakers from potential backlash.”
The myriad Obama scams help Americans to realize more than ever that Obama cannot be trusted. Even his own aides know Obama has a “credibility crisis”:
“Robert Gibbs, Barack Obama’s chief spokesman, got into hot water this week for daring to speak the truth – that the Democrats could lose control of the House of Representatives in November. But it could be even worse than that.
Contrary to pretty much every projection until now, Democratic control of the Senate is also starting to coming into question. While Mr Obama’s approval ratings have continued to fall, and now hover at dangerously close to 40 per cent according an ABC-Washington Post poll published on Tuesday, the fate of his former colleagues in the Senate looks even worse.[snip]
“If you ask me where the silver lining is for President Obama, I have to say I cannot see one,” says Bill Galston, a former Clinton official, who has been predicting for months the Democrats could lose the House. “Just as BP’s failure to cap the well has been so damaging, Obama’s failure to cap unemployment will be his undoing. There is nothing he can do to affect the jobless rate before November.” [snip]
“The bottom line here is that Americans don’t believe in President Obama’s leadership,” says Rob Shapiro, another former Clinton official and a supporter of Mr Obama. [snip]
In private, informal advisors to Mr Obama are almost as negative. According to one, the US public’s loss of confidence in Mr Obama’s leadership is a factor above and beyond their dissatisfaction over the state of the real economy, which continues to slow as last year’s $787bn stimulus starts to run dry. The adviser, who asked to remain anonymous, said the public did not know what Mr Obama really believed. [snip]
“I never thought I would say this, but even I’m unsure what President Obama really believes,” says the adviser.”
The question “Who is Obama” is getting answered – not by Obama protectors in Big Media – but by the sensible American public.
The answer is “No Confidence – No Trust – NObama“.
“Four months before midterm elections that will define the second half of his term, nearly six in 10 voters say they lack faith in the president to make the right decisions for the country, and a clear majority once again disapproves of how he is dealing with the economy.”
“Economists have declared the economic recession over largely over, but most Americans don’t share their optimism, and they are increasingly blaming President Obama for their money woes.
Mr. Obama’s approval rating on the economy has tumbled five percentage points from last month, according to a new CBS News poll, with just 40 percent of those polled expressing full confidence in his actions.
More than half of those questioned (54 percent) said they disapproved of Mr. Obama’s handling of the economy. Last month, 45 percent approved. The drop in approval has been seen mostly among independents, just 35 percent of whom now say they approve.”
Obama now owns the bad economy, or rather, the bad economy now owns Obama. Everywhere you look it’s bad news, bad economy, bad results for the boy raised by wolves:
“He has been trying to sell the success of his stimulus legislation for months in speeches, interviews, and events all over the country. In the CBS poll, only 23 percent think it has helped the economy. Only 13 percent think it has helped them personally. Despite all of his efforts, people are either ignoring him or tuning him out—or they can’t hear him over the bad economic news. Whatever the reason, the best argument Obama has for how he and Democrats have addressed the issue people care the most about is one that people aren’t buying.
The situation on health care is worse. There have been some signs that public opinion about health care was improving a little, but the Pew and CBS polls offer a darker outlook. Forty-nine percent disapprove of the new legislation, according to the CBS poll, and only 36 percent approve. Pew has nearly identical numbers.
This is not the way the president said things would turn out last March….”
“Let’s also take a look at the latest poll from Democratic polling firm Democracy Corps. They allowed people who disapproved of the President (50%, in their poll) to give an open-ended response as to why they disapproved of the President, and created a word cloud for the responses:[snip]
As you can see, health care overwhelms the economy in these responses, and policy-driven answers such as “spending,” “oil spill,” and “everything” are about as salient as “economy.” Indeed, on page 22 of the survey, the top reasons given for disapproving of the President were fiscal irresponsibility, health care, and the oil spill. More respondents expressed concern that the President was a socialist/communist (8%) than were upset about jobs and unemployment (6%).”
* * * * * *
So what to do? What will Obama do? What can Obama do? What has Obama done before? Race-bait. Race-bait. Race-bait. Get your allies to race-bait too:
“I believe that the NAACP is making a grave mistake in stereotyping a diverse group of Americans who care deeply about their country and who contribute their time, energy and resources to make a difference. [snip]
The only purpose of such an unfair accusation of racism is to dissuade good Americans from joining the Tea Party movement or listening to the common sense message of Tea Party Americans who simply want government to abide by our Constitution, live within its means, and not borrow and spend away our children’s futures. Red and yellow, black and white, this message is precious in all our sights. All decent Americans abhor racism. No one wants to be associated with any organization that is in any way racist in sentiment or origin. I certainly don’t want to be. Thankfully, the Tea Party movement is not racist or motivated by racism. It is motivated by love of country and all that is good and honest about our proud and diverse nation.”
Race-bait. Divide. Conquer. Race-bait again. Repeat. Even African-Americans will be race-baited. African-Americans will be race-baited and intimidated with the “Uncle Tom” epithet.
The only new twist to the race-baiting is that Latinos are being added to the mix. Barack Obama will try to use Latinos and the Arizona law on illegal immigrants to dupe white liberal Hopium Guzzlers, the mostly easier to dupe young, and assorted Big Blog Idiot Boys. But the “screw then re-use Latinos” strategy will not work:
“Obama was elected into office on the promise that he would tackle immigration in 2009. He decided, however, to give priority to health care reform, financial regulatory reform and energy legislation. As recently as two months ago, on Air Force One, just as Senate leaders were announcing a new push on immigration reform, the President was caught in a moment of candor. “We’ve gone through a very tough year and I’ve been working Congress very hard, so I know there may not be an appetite immediately to dive into another controversial issue,” he said of immigration reform.
“That pretty much killed chances of reform [this year],” says Frank Sharry, founder and executive director of America’s Voice, a group that supports comprehensive reform. “Unless there is some miracle, we are talking about early next year.”
Around the same time as Obama’s Air Force One comment, the Gallup poll noted a significant drop in Hispanic support for the President, a major concern for White House political advisers who need Hispanic votes in 2010 and ’12 in swing states like Nevada, Colorado and Florida. Gallup measured a 6-point drop in Hispanic job approval, from 63% to 57% between April and May. The drop was 11 points among Hispanics who were interviewed by Gallup in Spanish. During the same period, Gallup noted no change in the job approval for Obama among non-Hispanic black or white voters.”
Latinos are not stupid. They know Obama promised to “tackle immigration in 2009” and it was just a lie. Now in 2010 Obama is trying to bamboozle Latinos. But Latinos are not stupid. Latinos know they are being played by a master flim-flam man from Chicago. And in either case there is a mistaken assumption that Latinos will base their votes on illegal immigration:
“First, there’s an assumption underlying much of the Arizona analysis that Hispanics will base their votes on the immigration issue as uniformly as African American voters have historically based their votes with regard to civil rights. This seems unlikely. The exit polls suggest that as many as one-in-three Hispanic voters have voted directly contrary to their supposed interests on questions of ethnicity and immigration.
The second takeaway is on a touchier subject, but it is nevertheless important. Analysts assume that a Democratic coalition of Asians, African Americans, Hispanics and liberal whites would be a stable governing coalition supporting a liberal/progressive agenda. But building a political coalition is like pushing on a water balloon – you press in one area, and another area bulges. Sometimes the whole thing will explode.
The history of multi-ethnic coalitions is replete with examples of such explosions. [snip]
In the case of California in the 1990s, note that Asians and African Americans supported Prop 187 at substantially higher rates than did Hispanics, and that Asians were more supportive of Prop 209.”
The main lesson to draw from the Obama race-baiting tactics using Latinos as his cats paw is that this is a strategy designed to help Obama in 2012 by testing themes and tactics in 2010. Obama helps himself but hurts Dimocrats in 2010:
“The Obama administration’s lawsuit over the stringent Arizona border law might have just made the incline a little steeper for many Western Democrats, providing instant fodder to Republicans who are already optimistic about regaining ground lost over the last two election cycles.
The dust from the Department of Justice lawsuit filed Tuesday is just starting to settle, but the reflexive sense among strategists on both sides is that it will be a net negative for Democrats this fall.
The suit could, of course, help boost turnout among Hispanic voters in key areas across the West. And stridently anti-immigrant rhetoric could turn off independent voters. Yet many foresee a midterm electorate featuring an energized Republican base—for whom the immigration issue has emerged as a priority—prompting moderate white Western voters who are concerned about jobs to decamp to the GOP at least in the short term, political observers said.
“This is a tough issue for Democrats,” said former Colorado Gov. Dick Lamm, a Democrat who is co-director of the Institute for Public Policy Studies at the University of Denver. “Politically, I just can’t think of any place in the West where this is going to play well.”
“If you look like you’re siding with illegal immigration, you’re in trouble,” said one national Republican strategist, adding that when it comes to the discussion of secured borders, “people think that’s what should happen.”
“While the suit could prove helpful to President Barack Obama by revving up his own base in 2012 – and, by extension, prove harmful to Republicans that year because they risk offending a key and growing segment of the electorate—the near-term impact is a different matter.[snip]
Wes Gullett, an Arizona political strategist and a former long-time aide to Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), said the lawsuit was “manna from heaven” for Republicans.
“Obviously, the White House is tone deaf on Western politics,” said Gullett, who noted he personally opposes the law. “While a lot of people wish that our law wouldn’t go into effect, for the administration to sue on this is crazy. It is just a complete political loser.”
Republicans have failed in recent years to turn the anger towards illegal immigration into a winning election issue, Lamm said, but this year could be different.
“This is an issue that is boiling and it is not one that is going to be a happy outcome for Democrats,” said Lamm, who favors tougher immigration and border enforcement policies.”
It’s about saving Obama and screwing his own allies.
“Both sides of the issue are well-aware that, in every survey since Republican Gov. Jan Brewer signed the bill into law, voters have shown support for the measure, which greatly complicates the situation for Democrats. Now, at a minimum, they’ll spend what should be a relatively sleepy stretch of summer months defending themselves on a wedge issue.
A May national survey by the Pew Research Center for the People and the Press found 73 percent of Americans support requiring people to produce papers verifying their legal status if police ask for them.
In Colorado, home to a competitive Senate and gubernatorial race this fall and several vulnerable House Democrats, a Denver Post/9News Poll conducted last month showed even 62 percent of Colorado Hispanic voters – roughly the same percentage as white voters (61 percent) — would favor their state implementing a law similar to the one in Arizona.”
Latinos are not stupid. Latinos do not necessarily support illegal immigration just because it is supposed to be, according to Big Media, what Latinos are supposed to do. It is soft bigotry which presupposes Latinos support illegal immigration from Mexico or anywhere else.
The Dimocratic governors are aware that Obama only cares about his 2012 worries and not about them:
“In a private meeting with White House officials this weekend, Democratic governors voiced deep anxiety about the Obama administration’s suit against Arizona’s new immigration law, worrying that it could cost a vulnerable Democratic Party in the fall elections.
While the weak economy dominated the official agenda at the summer meeting here of the National Governors Association, concern over immigration policy pervaded the closed-door session between Democratic governors and White House officials and simmered throughout the three-day event.
At the Democrats’ meeting on Saturday, some governors bemoaned the timing of the Justice Department lawsuit, according to two governors who spoke anonymously because the discussion was private.
“Universally the governors are saying, ‘We’ve got to talk about jobs,’ ” Gov. Phil Bredesen of Tennessee, a Democrat, said in an interview. “And all of a sudden we have immigration going on.”
He added, “It is such a toxic subject, such an important time for Democrats.”
Independent voters are sick and tired of Obama and his dim-witted Dimocrats. The Obama race-baiting on Tea Parties and Latinos is a tactic to red-flag Dimocratic voters to vote.
Latinos are not going to be fooled. Recently another Obama Big Media ally race-baited over the possibility that in the next U.S. Senate there will be zero African-Americans.
“In modern times, four African Americans – Edward Brooke (1967-79) of Massachusetts, Carol Mosley Braun of Illinois (1993-99), Barack Obama (2005-08) of Illinois, and Roland Burris (2009-10) of Illinois – have served, and each has been the lone African-American Senator serving at that point. Braun, Obama and Burris all held the same seat, with Braun winning it during the “Year of the Woman” in 1992, Obama winning it in 2004 before winning the Presidency in 2008, and Burris now holding it as an appointed Senator who will not run for re-election.[snip]
Will the Senate return to its usual lily-white state (it has been segregated longer than it has had an African-American presence) after the 2010 election? That depends on whether Congressman Kendrick Meek (D-Fla.) is able to prevail in his Florida primary on August 24. While former President Bill Clinton and Vice President Joe Biden have held fundraisers for Meek, Meek is not the frontrunner in his primary. [snip]
If Meek can’t pull this one off, the United States Senate will become, again, a segregated body. So much for post-racial America.“
The Obama loving, Hopium Guzzling, African-American writer (Julianne Malveaux) of the above article clearly does not believe that Latino Marco Rubio winning the Senate seat would NOT be a plus for “post-racial America”. According to the race-baiters unless your African-American candidate wins then racism has triumphed. Latinos need not apply for these race-baiters. And isn’t it ironic that “racist” Bill Clinton is one of the few doing anything to help the hapless Meeks?
With 74% support for the Arizona law on illegal immigration Obama’s Latino rehearsal for 2012 will not go well. Obama Dimocrats will pay for Obama’s self-centered rehearsals in the here and now elections of 2010. Obama Dimocrats are learning that Obama cannot be trusted by friend nor foe. He simply cannot be trusted.
As the NObama Coalition flourishes with additional millions of bitter, clingy, Americans, Obama’s treacheries are also surging.
On this Bastille Day, we celebrate Liberté, Egalité, Fraternité. But we look forward to November when the guillotine will rend it’s justice at the polls.