It’s a gusher. The Oily Obama Sestak story exploded today. As we predicted yesterday, the slimy Obama White House released it’s stonewall cover-up report on a Friday before a major holiday. But that strategy won’t work. The cover-up won’t cover up. A potential felony has been committed. A potential impeachment is on the way. The Obama Chicago Corruption Circus tent will soon fold. A Special Prosecutor is desperately needed by the American people to cut off the corrupt Chicago tentacles.
Now Bill Clinton is involved in the slimy Obama potential felony. The White House puts Bill Clinton right into the center of this scandal – and it is now an official scandal – and our sympathy for Bill is limited.
Bill Clinton is about to find out that if you lie down with dogs you get up with fleas. Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton should have from the very start kept away from the Chicago corruption, even if Hillary decided to serve her country as Secretary of State. But keep away from the Chicago Corruption. For whatever reason Bill Clinton “did his duty” and helped out the White House. We have little sympathy for Bill here. Bill Clinton is about to find out that:
Obama simply cannot be trusted. Obama cannot be trusted on any issue. Obama cannot be trusted by his friends. Obama cannot be trusted by his enemies. Obama cannot be trusted.
To compound the problem, Bill Clinton met with Barack Obama yesterday. To all appearances this meeting now appears to be a “get the story straight” meeting. It reeks of obstruction of justice. Central player in the drama, Rahm Emanuel, disappeared to Israel, and has not answered questions.
Also yesterday, the White House, according to Roll Call, contacted Sestaks brother. This also gives the appearance of a “get the story straight” obstruction of justice.
“…Sestak said his brother and an unnamed White House official or officials spoke about “what was going to occur.” Sestak declined to identify who made the call for the administration, adding that he has had no direct contact with the White House.
Sestak called Obama a “pretty legitimate person.” He added, “But we’ll find out shortly what they have to say.”
Sestak was tight-lipped about the situation, declining to comment on whether he would agree with the White House’s take on the situation. He pledged to say more — and even to return to Washington for a Capitol Hill news conference over the weekend or early next week — once the White House had made its announcement.”
These White House contacts with potential witnesses to an investigation reek of obstruction of justice. That Bill Clinton met privately with Barack Obama yesterday looks ugly in the extreme. Of course this all does put Bill in the driver’s seat. Eventually Bill Clinton will have to answer questions on this Obama scandal and what he says can destroy the Obama White House and flush out the sewers of corruption gushing from Chicago.
The Obama thug machine spewed a page and a quarter “response” [read the short, flimsy thing HERE] to the potentially felony which has been alleged. It is a stonewall response in every way. There are no details, no dates, no information of any sort – just untrustworthy denials. And as we wrote, this report was issued while one of the central figures, Rahm Emanuel, is in Israel and not willing to answer questions.
Big Media and Big Blog boys are in full defense mode as the Obama White House sinks from it’s own oily corruption. Journalistic poseurs such as Ben Smith write: “With Bill Clinton now in the middle of a Sestak story whose import I’m still having a bit of trouble grasping” and clown “lawyers” who LeftTalk think the story is over. These clods seem not to understand that there is a felony involved.
There is a felony crime alleged here and the person making the allegations is a key material participant. That person is Joe Sestak.
One of the statutes of this potential felony is this one:
“Sec. 600. Promise of employment or other benefit for political activity
Whoever, directly or indirectly, promises any employment, position, compensation, contract, appointment, or other benefit, provided for or made possible in whole or in part by any Act of Congress, or any special consideration in obtaining any such benefit, to any person as consideration, favor, or reward for any political activity or for the support of or opposition to any candidate or any political party in connection with any general or special election to any political office, or in connection with any primary election or political convention or caucus held to select candidates for any political office, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both. [snip]
1972 – Pub. L. 92-225 struck out “work,” after “position,”, inserted “contract, appointment,” after “compensation,” and “or any special consideration in obtaining any such benefit,” after “Act of Congress,”, and substituted “in connection with any general or special election to any political office, or in connection with any primary election or political convention or caucus held to select candidates for any political office” for “in any election”.”
This is exactly what material witness, Joe Sestak, alleged on February 18, 2010:
“It was just something I’d been hearing about from a variety of sources. Was it true? I didn’t know , but I decided to pop the question.
During the taping of my Comcast Network Voice of Reason show, which airs Sunday night at 9:30, I asked Congressman Joe Sestak: “Is it true that you were offered a high ranking job in the administration in a bid to get you to drop out of the primary against Arlen Specter?”
Sestak looked a little surprised by the question. He said, “Yes.”
I asked him if the job was Navy Secretary. He said, “I can’t comment on that.” In the next few seconds, he admitted that it was a “high up’ job, that it came from the White House, and that he didn’t accept the offering. He proceeded to say that nothing will stop him from completing the race against Specter for the Democratic nomination.
Was I surprised? A little. After all, I was just probing.
Two hours later, I called the White House press office. I played the tape, and asked for a reaction. They never called back. That didn’t surprise me. If it did happen, and if they did try to get Sestak out of the race, how could they deny it?“
Someone, or a lot of someones are lying. Sestak must testify under oath before a prosecutor – he’s either a liar, imbecile, or a material witness to a felony. Bill Clinton must testify under oath before a prosecutor. Rahm Emanuel must testify under oath before a prosecutor. Barack Obama must testify under oath before a prosecutor.
A Special Prosecutor is needed to get to the bottom of this scandal. The Gulf of Mexico is drenched in Oil. The District of Columbia is drenched in Corruption.