<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Victory In Massachusetts &#8211; Brown Versus Coakley</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hillaryis44.org/2010/01/10/victory-in-massachusetts-brown-versus-coakley/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hillaryis44.org/2010/01/10/victory-in-massachusetts-brown-versus-coakley/</link>
	<description>We started this website because we believe Senator Hillary Clinton will be an excellent 44th President of the United States.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 16:15:06 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brown Versus Coakley &#8211; Barry, We Hardly Knew Ye &#151; Hillary Is 44</title>
		<link>http://www.hillaryis44.org/2010/01/10/victory-in-massachusetts-brown-versus-coakley/#comment-276269</link>
		<dc:creator>Brown Versus Coakley &#8211; Barry, We Hardly Knew Ye &#151; Hillary Is 44</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 22:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hillaryis44.org/?p=1672#comment-276269</guid>
		<description>[...] succession rights to Scott Brown if he wins the special election on Tuesday. As we have written that threat will infuriate Massachusetts voters. The legal questions are already wafting before a single vote [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] succession rights to Scott Brown if he wins the special election on Tuesday. As we have written that threat will infuriate Massachusetts voters. The legal questions are already wafting before a single vote [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brown Versus Coakley &#8211; And The Ted Kennedy, Barack Obama Stench &#151; Hillary Is 44</title>
		<link>http://www.hillaryis44.org/2010/01/10/victory-in-massachusetts-brown-versus-coakley/#comment-275760</link>
		<dc:creator>Brown Versus Coakley &#8211; And The Ted Kennedy, Barack Obama Stench &#151; Hillary Is 44</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 14:07:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hillaryis44.org/?p=1672#comment-275760</guid>
		<description>[...] As previously written, Bill Clinton is the only force (other than Hillary Clinton) that can employ electoral persuasive powers to keep the dirty Ted Kennedy Senate seat away from the Republicans. But Bill Clinton should stay at work to help the earthquake destroyed Haiti. Even Bill Clinton can no longer prevent Scott Brown from victory.  Scott Brown will be the worthy successor to the political assassin and Mary Jo Kopechne killer. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] As previously written, Bill Clinton is the only force (other than Hillary Clinton) that can employ electoral persuasive powers to keep the dirty Ted Kennedy Senate seat away from the Republicans. But Bill Clinton should stay at work to help the earthquake destroyed Haiti. Even Bill Clinton can no longer prevent Scott Brown from victory.  Scott Brown will be the worthy successor to the political assassin and Mary Jo Kopechne killer. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brown Versus Coakley &#8211; Halperin&#8217;s Game Change, The Democratic Left Creative Class, The Boston Tea Party Movement And The NObama Coalition &#151; Hillary Is 44</title>
		<link>http://www.hillaryis44.org/2010/01/10/victory-in-massachusetts-brown-versus-coakley/#comment-275572</link>
		<dc:creator>Brown Versus Coakley &#8211; Halperin&#8217;s Game Change, The Democratic Left Creative Class, The Boston Tea Party Movement And The NObama Coalition &#151; Hillary Is 44</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 15:56:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hillaryis44.org/?p=1672#comment-275572</guid>
		<description>[...] the wake of our article on the Scott Brown vs. Martha Coakley race in Massachusetts (Victory In Massachusetts &#8211; Brown Versus Coakley) we have been accused of being &#8220;Libertarians&#8221;, &#8220;Republicans&#8221;, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the wake of our article on the Scott Brown vs. Martha Coakley race in Massachusetts (Victory In Massachusetts &#8211; Brown Versus Coakley) we have been accused of being &#8220;Libertarians&#8221;, &#8220;Republicans&#8221;, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gonzotx</title>
		<link>http://www.hillaryis44.org/2010/01/10/victory-in-massachusetts-brown-versus-coakley/#comment-275291</link>
		<dc:creator>gonzotx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 10:06:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hillaryis44.org/?p=1672#comment-275291</guid>
		<description>Excellent Posts Admin. I have been working double shifts and have not had the time to add a comment or two, but have spent the last hour catching up. 
I think this ridiculous book is being pushed to take the Frauds disasters out of the headlines. His failures to protect this Country with his golf car cabinet, the health care bill, economy, job losses. etc. BC and HC are wise to ignore the whole thing and not take the bait. That being said, I will contact Dobbs and voice my great disappointment on the above comments. I usually find him fair and have talked to him on his radio show several times. I&#039;m mad as hell at him
Those clips of Brown calling the Senate seat the People&#039;s seat are priceless. David G is a MAJOR disappointment and a paid Fraud butt kisser and Brown definitely got the better of him. I think he made a lot of points with that spot on statement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent Posts Admin. I have been working double shifts and have not had the time to add a comment or two, but have spent the last hour catching up.<br />
I think this ridiculous book is being pushed to take the Frauds disasters out of the headlines. His failures to protect this Country with his golf car cabinet, the health care bill, economy, job losses. etc. BC and HC are wise to ignore the whole thing and not take the bait. That being said, I will contact Dobbs and voice my great disappointment on the above comments. I usually find him fair and have talked to him on his radio show several times. I&#8217;m mad as hell at him<br />
Those clips of Brown calling the Senate seat the People&#8217;s seat are priceless. David G is a MAJOR disappointment and a paid Fraud butt kisser and Brown definitely got the better of him. I think he made a lot of points with that spot on statement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wbboei</title>
		<link>http://www.hillaryis44.org/2010/01/10/victory-in-massachusetts-brown-versus-coakley/#comment-275161</link>
		<dc:creator>wbboei</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 17:50:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hillaryis44.org/?p=1672#comment-275161</guid>
		<description>As for Former President Clinton, the only report here comes through the mouth of a not particularly honest dead man, and they are, more notably, completely devoid of context. “A few years ago, this guy would have been getting us coffee” is all we have to go on.
---------------------------
True.  Plus, it was repeated, if at all, to an unknown source who is a friend and therefore part of the Kennedy machine seeking to prop up the asshole in the White House.  This comment is pure trash. In a court room it would draw an objection of incompetent irrelevant and immaterial and if Obama was on the other side of the case he would rise to his feet and say: you rang?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As for Former President Clinton, the only report here comes through the mouth of a not particularly honest dead man, and they are, more notably, completely devoid of context. “A few years ago, this guy would have been getting us coffee” is all we have to go on.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<br />
True.  Plus, it was repeated, if at all, to an unknown source who is a friend and therefore part of the Kennedy machine seeking to prop up the asshole in the White House.  This comment is pure trash. In a court room it would draw an objection of incompetent irrelevant and immaterial and if Obama was on the other side of the case he would rise to his feet and say: you rang?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: confloyd</title>
		<link>http://www.hillaryis44.org/2010/01/10/victory-in-massachusetts-brown-versus-coakley/#comment-275155</link>
		<dc:creator>confloyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 17:30:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hillaryis44.org/?p=1672#comment-275155</guid>
		<description>What I am mad about is that he&#039;s dead and can&#039;t see what that devil he has backed has done. He got to check out before the shit really hits the fan here in America.

So no one in the WH is saying that BC is not a racist, only Harry Reid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I am mad about is that he&#8217;s dead and can&#8217;t see what that devil he has backed has done. He got to check out before the shit really hits the fan here in America.</p>
<p>So no one in the WH is saying that BC is not a racist, only Harry Reid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.hillaryis44.org/2010/01/10/victory-in-massachusetts-brown-versus-coakley/#comment-275154</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 17:29:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hillaryis44.org/?p=1672#comment-275154</guid>
		<description>NEW ARTICLE IS UP.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NEW ARTICLE IS UP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Halperin&#8217;s Book &#8211; Harry Reid&#8217;s Negro Macaca, Barack Obama&#8217;s War On Hillary Clinton, Part I &#151; Hillary Is 44</title>
		<link>http://www.hillaryis44.org/2010/01/10/victory-in-massachusetts-brown-versus-coakley/#comment-275152</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Halperin&#8217;s Book &#8211; Harry Reid&#8217;s Negro Macaca, Barack Obama&#8217;s War On Hillary Clinton, Part I &#151; Hillary Is 44</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 17:29:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hillaryis44.org/?p=1672#comment-275152</guid>
		<description>[...] Victory In Massachusetts &#8211; Brown Versus Coakley &#187; &#160;Home&#160; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Victory In Massachusetts &#8211; Brown Versus Coakley &raquo; &nbsp;Home&nbsp; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rgb44hrc</title>
		<link>http://www.hillaryis44.org/2010/01/10/victory-in-massachusetts-brown-versus-coakley/#comment-275151</link>
		<dc:creator>rgb44hrc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 17:23:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hillaryis44.org/?p=1672#comment-275151</guid>
		<description>According to the Metro paper on the train today, Bill Clinton was also quoted as saying to Kennedy on the phone was something to the effect that (from memory) &quot;The only reason you are supporting Obama is because he is black&quot;.  And they mentioned the &quot;getting us coffee&quot; quote.

Where is the racism in these comments???  They are analytical, honest opinions.  Would TK have supported a white Junior senator with only two unspectacular years experience in the Senate and a couple of mundane years in a state senate?  Heck, there are people who just turned 30 who have more under their belt.

If TK wants to say it was because of Obama&#039;s &quot;strong stance against the Iraq war&quot;, heck, why not nominate one of the big organizers (Eli Pariser) from MoveOn.Org, or someone who truly and continually was against the Iraq action.  Obama became totally mute on the topic once elected to the US Senate.

So it looks like TK thought, misogynistically, that a black candidate was the only hope of &quot;saving the Democrats&quot; from yet another Clinton.  So TK is a misogynistic, Clinton hater, and his argument that Bill was using code-word racism is totally disingenuous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to the Metro paper on the train today, Bill Clinton was also quoted as saying to Kennedy on the phone was something to the effect that (from memory) &#8220;The only reason you are supporting Obama is because he is black&#8221;.  And they mentioned the &#8220;getting us coffee&#8221; quote.</p>
<p>Where is the racism in these comments???  They are analytical, honest opinions.  Would TK have supported a white Junior senator with only two unspectacular years experience in the Senate and a couple of mundane years in a state senate?  Heck, there are people who just turned 30 who have more under their belt.</p>
<p>If TK wants to say it was because of Obama&#8217;s &#8220;strong stance against the Iraq war&#8221;, heck, why not nominate one of the big organizers (Eli Pariser) from MoveOn.Org, or someone who truly and continually was against the Iraq action.  Obama became totally mute on the topic once elected to the US Senate.</p>
<p>So it looks like TK thought, misogynistically, that a black candidate was the only hope of &#8220;saving the Democrats&#8221; from yet another Clinton.  So TK is a misogynistic, Clinton hater, and his argument that Bill was using code-word racism is totally disingenuous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wbboei</title>
		<link>http://www.hillaryis44.org/2010/01/10/victory-in-massachusetts-brown-versus-coakley/#comment-275150</link>
		<dc:creator>wbboei</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 17:21:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hillaryis44.org/?p=1672#comment-275150</guid>
		<description>Nelson has got to go.  He is a traitor to the party and to the country.  His treachery in the primary is now a matter of record. His selling the country down the river is manifest in his vote on health care.  I wish Marco Rubio was running for HIS seat instead of Mendendez&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nelson has got to go.  He is a traitor to the party and to the country.  His treachery in the primary is now a matter of record. His selling the country down the river is manifest in his vote on health care.  I wish Marco Rubio was running for HIS seat instead of Mendendez&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
