Comments on: Hillary Clinton And The Sanity Bubble http://www.hillaryis44.org/2009/12/31/hillary-clinton-and-the-sanity-bubble/ We started this website because we believe Senator Hillary Clinton will be an excellent 44th President of the United States. Tue, 16 Mar 2010 04:07:48 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 By: Puma-SF http://www.hillaryis44.org/2009/12/31/hillary-clinton-and-the-sanity-bubble/#comment-274352 Puma-SF Sun, 03 Jan 2010 07:01:22 +0000 http://www.hillaryis44.org/?p=1653#comment-274352 admin: Great post. Hillary 2012. I'm shovel and cell phone ready. admin: Great post. Hillary 2012. I’m shovel and cell phone ready.

]]> By: wbboei http://www.hillaryis44.org/2009/12/31/hillary-clinton-and-the-sanity-bubble/#comment-274289 wbboei Sat, 02 Jan 2010 02:56:10 +0000 http://www.hillaryis44.org/?p=1653#comment-274289 That lovechild from deliverance Claire McCaskill is now speculating on the possibility that she will not be re elected because of the health care program and other conspicuous lapses in judgment and a crude ways. Can you think of a time when a senator who is one year into a six year term is thinking she will not get re elected. That is remarkable. Then again, sometimes the damage that is done at the outset is not forgotten by her constituents. Also, five years from now, Obama will be a bad memory, and she will be facing an angry electorate. So maybe she is smarter than I think she is. That lovechild from deliverance Claire McCaskill is now speculating on the possibility that she will not be re elected because of the health care program and other conspicuous lapses in judgment and a crude ways.

Can you think of a time when a senator who is one year into a six year term is thinking she will not get re elected. That is remarkable. Then again, sometimes the damage that is done at the outset is not forgotten by her constituents. Also, five years from now, Obama will be a bad memory, and she will be facing an angry electorate. So maybe she is smarter than I think she is.

]]> By: admin http://www.hillaryis44.org/2009/12/31/hillary-clinton-and-the-sanity-bubble/#comment-274288 admin Sat, 02 Jan 2010 02:54:55 +0000 http://www.hillaryis44.org/?p=1653#comment-274288 NEW ARTICLE IS UP. NEW ARTICLE IS UP.

]]> By: wbboei http://www.hillaryis44.org/2009/12/31/hillary-clinton-and-the-sanity-bubble/#comment-274287 wbboei Sat, 02 Jan 2010 02:49:08 +0000 http://www.hillaryis44.org/?p=1653#comment-274287 It takes the combined genius of Obama Emanuel and Axelrod to get so many blue dog Democrats to fall on their swords over a health care program which is toxic on the merits, passed through a bribery process, and is probably unconstitutional. This bill will adversely affect and thereby wipe out a key part of their base. Granted, they will try to distract with other issues, this one will become a death of a thousand cuts for them in 2010. And because they did not read the bill, they do not know what a political minefield it will be for them. It takes the combined genius of Obama Emanuel and Axelrod to get so many blue dog Democrats to fall on their swords over a health care program which is toxic on the merits, passed through a bribery process, and is probably unconstitutional. This bill will adversely affect and thereby wipe out a key part of their base. Granted, they will try to distract with other issues, this one will become a death of a thousand cuts for them in 2010. And because they did not read the bill, they do not know what a political minefield it will be for them.

]]> By: wbboei http://www.hillaryis44.org/2009/12/31/hillary-clinton-and-the-sanity-bubble/#comment-274286 wbboei Sat, 02 Jan 2010 02:32:34 +0000 http://www.hillaryis44.org/?p=1653#comment-274286 Correction: the title was the Press Has Caught BAYH Lying. Catching Obama lying would scarcely be newsworthy. Correction: the title was the Press Has Caught BAYH Lying. Catching Obama lying would scarcely be newsworthy.

]]> By: wbboei http://www.hillaryis44.org/2009/12/31/hillary-clinton-and-the-sanity-bubble/#comment-274285 wbboei Sat, 02 Jan 2010 02:27:35 +0000 http://www.hillaryis44.org/?p=1653#comment-274285 A friend of mine who used to be a supporter of Bayh was so incensed about his treachery toward voters that wrote him a letter calling him on his deceipt. She is a Hillary democrat, not a republican. Nevertheless, she would find much to agree with in the article below which emanates from a republican site. The Press Has Caught Obama Lying We all know the names of the Democratic Senators who face tough re-election runs in 2010: Lincoln, Reid, Specter, Bennet, Dodd, and maybe Gillibrand and Dorgan and a few others. One of the names that’s not usually on the list is Indiana Senator Evan Bayh. While Bayh represents a state that will probably turn reliably red again, he has carefully cultivated a reputation as a moderate. His surname is probably as popular as any in Indiana. And it’s not clear if his Republican opponent will be able to raise the money to make this a real race. But one thing that’s likely to make this race more competitive would be if the voters of Indiana realize that he’s been playing them for suckers when it comes to Obamacare: Bayh, the moderate former Indiana governor, has always enjoyed support among many of the state’s conservative residents, but his vote for the Senate Democratic health care bill last week may endanger that support. Obviously, he is aware of the challenge. Courier & Press staff writer Eric Bradner reported Sunday that Bayh had released a 700-plus word statement in which he attempted to explain what a tough decision it was to vote for the health bill. However, Bradner reported also that according to The New York Times and Roll Call, Bayh told fellow Senate Democrats behind closed doors that it was the kind of public policy decision he came to Washington to work on. Also, he was reported to have said that he did not want to see the satisfied looks on the faces of Republican legislators had the health reform bill failed. The question, now is how he will react to the angry looks on the faces of Indiana constituents who did not support the Senate health care bill. Bayh’s behind-the-scenes work in support of Obamacare was likely critical in winning the 60 votes needed to break a filibuster. Instead of joining with Democrats like Ben Nelson and Blanche Lincoln to put the brakes on the health care overhaul, Bayh was carrying water for Harry Reid. Instead of Reid facing a bloc of holdout moderates, he was able to buy off Lincoln and Nelson rather easily. And all the while Bayh was telling his constituents that he was conflicted about the bill, and might vote against. We also see that Bayh looks at the health care system not as one with challenges that need fixing, but as a chance to deliver Democrats a big political victory. Rather than being motivated by a desire to ensure his constituents get the best possible care, Bayh’s priority is to make sure that Barack Obama, Harry Reid, and the Senate Democrats get a political win. In a state like Indiana, and in a year like 2010, Bayh will have a lot to answer for. A friend of mine who used to be a supporter of Bayh was so incensed about his treachery toward voters that wrote him a letter calling him on his deceipt. She is a Hillary democrat, not a republican. Nevertheless, she would find much to agree with in the article below which emanates from a republican site.

The Press Has Caught Obama Lying

We all know the names of the Democratic Senators who face tough re-election runs in 2010: Lincoln, Reid, Specter, Bennet, Dodd, and maybe Gillibrand and Dorgan and a few others. One of the names that’s not usually on the list is Indiana Senator Evan Bayh. While Bayh represents a state that will probably turn reliably red again, he has carefully cultivated a reputation as a moderate. His surname is probably as popular as any in Indiana. And it’s not clear if his Republican opponent will be able to raise the money to make this a real race.

But one thing that’s likely to make this race more competitive would be if the voters of Indiana realize that he’s been playing them for suckers when it comes to Obamacare:

Bayh, the moderate former Indiana governor, has always enjoyed support among many of the state’s conservative residents, but his vote for the Senate Democratic health care bill last week may endanger that support.

Obviously, he is aware of the challenge. Courier & Press staff writer Eric Bradner reported Sunday that Bayh had released a 700-plus word statement in which he attempted to explain what a tough decision it was to vote for the health bill.

However, Bradner reported also that according to The New York Times and Roll Call, Bayh told fellow Senate Democrats behind closed doors that it was the kind of public policy decision he came to Washington to work on.

Also, he was reported to have said that he did not want to see the satisfied looks on the faces of Republican legislators had the health reform bill failed.

The question, now is how he will react to the angry looks on the faces of Indiana constituents who did not support the Senate health care bill.

Bayh’s behind-the-scenes work in support of Obamacare was likely critical in winning the 60 votes needed to break a filibuster. Instead of joining with Democrats like Ben Nelson and Blanche Lincoln to put the brakes on the health care overhaul, Bayh was carrying water for Harry Reid. Instead of Reid facing a bloc of holdout moderates, he was able to buy off Lincoln and Nelson rather easily. And all the while Bayh was telling his constituents that he was conflicted about the bill, and might vote against.

We also see that Bayh looks at the health care system not as one with challenges that need fixing, but as a chance to deliver Democrats a big political victory. Rather than being motivated by a desire to ensure his constituents get the best possible care, Bayh’s priority is to make sure that Barack Obama, Harry Reid, and the Senate Democrats get a political win.

In a state like Indiana, and in a year like 2010, Bayh will have a lot to answer for.

]]> By: jbstonesfan http://www.hillaryis44.org/2009/12/31/hillary-clinton-and-the-sanity-bubble/#comment-274284 jbstonesfan Sat, 02 Jan 2010 02:09:49 +0000 http://www.hillaryis44.org/?p=1653#comment-274284 When someone complains about how bad the Palestinians are treated/live, they seem to always forget why. The reason is because their so called leaders refusal to recognize Israel's right to exist and a large majority (not small minority) of Arabs/Muslims want to destroy not only Israel and kill Jews, but as we saw this week, kill as many Americans as they can (including the innocent men, woman and children on that flight -where is the International condemnation and cries of war crimes?). They are treated as there are and live the way the do, because quite frankly, the world, and particularly Israel, will not be safe until they decide they want to live like human beings and stop acting like fanatics that seem intent to impose their perverse views on all of us. When someone complains about how bad the Palestinians are treated/live, they seem to always forget why. The reason is because their so called leaders refusal to recognize Israel’s right to exist and a large majority (not small minority) of Arabs/Muslims want to destroy not only Israel and kill Jews, but as we saw this week, kill as many Americans as they can (including the innocent men, woman and children on that flight -where is the International condemnation and cries of war crimes?). They are treated as there are and live the way the do, because quite frankly, the world, and particularly Israel, will not be safe until they decide they want to live like human beings and stop acting like fanatics that seem intent to impose their perverse views on all of us.

]]> By: wbboei http://www.hillaryis44.org/2009/12/31/hillary-clinton-and-the-sanity-bubble/#comment-274283 wbboei Sat, 02 Jan 2010 02:05:53 +0000 http://www.hillaryis44.org/?p=1653#comment-274283 They probably want to get rid of the supers, because they can still win by gaming the caucuses again and the proportional representation is in their favor. What creeps. The supers might not be won over so easily, if the president is weak and has low poll numbers. --------------------- That is their game and it is the only thing about Obama that is transparent/ They probably want to get rid of the supers, because they can still win by gaming the caucuses again and the proportional representation is in their favor. What creeps. The supers might not be won over so easily, if the president is weak and has low poll numbers.
———————
That is their game and it is the only thing about Obama that is transparent/

]]> By: wbboei http://www.hillaryis44.org/2009/12/31/hillary-clinton-and-the-sanity-bubble/#comment-274282 wbboei Sat, 02 Jan 2010 02:03:32 +0000 http://www.hillaryis44.org/?p=1653#comment-274282 wbboei, Well of coarse, Maulkin and her republican friends are going to blame the State dept. and Hillary, her likability numbers are high. They are afraid of Hillary, they know she really, really did win and her stint at the state dept. proves she has been and will be ready on day one. So of coarse they will try to demoralize her. THe lefties will help them because in their minds Hillary is a republican. The is what the Bush Cartel wants and this is what the Zbig cartel wants because the Clinton’s are dangerous they actually believe in American and its people. ------------------------------- Connie, I was asked to blog that information by our media expert who I have told you about. She called me yesterday morning with that information. She is concerned that the other side will capitalize on Obamas fall, and does not want that to happen. That is why I claified what Hillary did, as contrasted to what Obama did not do. Our expert told me to also say you cannot run the country in a time of crisis from the back of a golf cart. Even if there is nothing he could do with hourly updates, he should be seen as working not playing--or fiddling while Rome burns. It is symptomatic of his laziness and lack of serious purpose when it comes to defending this nation, and it reinforces the perception that he is pro Muslim, soft on terrorism and hates America as much as Reverend Wright does. There comes a point when perception becomes reality, and if there is a "man made disaster of some sort", let us help there is not, but if there is he is toast given the perception about him that already exists. That was also what our media expert said. wbboei, Well of coarse, Maulkin and her republican friends are going to blame the State dept. and Hillary, her likability numbers are high. They are afraid of Hillary, they know she really, really did win and her stint at the state dept. proves she has been and will be ready on day one. So of coarse they will try to demoralize her. THe lefties will help them because in their minds Hillary is a republican. The is what the Bush Cartel wants and this is what the Zbig cartel wants because the Clinton’s are dangerous they actually believe in American and its people.
——————————-
Connie, I was asked to blog that information by our media expert who I have told you about. She called me yesterday morning with that information. She is concerned that the other side will capitalize on Obamas fall, and does not want that to happen. That is why I claified what Hillary did, as contrasted to what Obama did not do. Our expert told me to also say you cannot run the country in a time of crisis from the back of a golf cart. Even if there is nothing he could do with hourly updates, he should be seen as working not playing–or fiddling while Rome burns. It is symptomatic of his laziness and lack of serious purpose when it comes to defending this nation, and it reinforces the perception that he is pro Muslim, soft on terrorism and hates America as much as Reverend Wright does. There comes a point when perception becomes reality, and if there is a “man made disaster of some sort”, let us help there is not, but if there is he is toast given the perception about him that already exists. That was also what our media expert said.

]]> By: birdgal http://www.hillaryis44.org/2009/12/31/hillary-clinton-and-the-sanity-bubble/#comment-274281 birdgal Sat, 02 Jan 2010 01:54:30 +0000 http://www.hillaryis44.org/?p=1653#comment-274281 They probably want to get rid of the supers, because they can still win by gaming the caucuses again and the proportional representation is in their favor. What creeps. The supers might not be won over so easily, if the president is weak and has low poll numbers. They probably want to get rid of the supers, because they can still win by gaming the caucuses again and the proportional representation is in their favor. What creeps. The supers might not be won over so easily, if the president is weak and has low poll numbers.

]]>