Comments on: Horses, Women, Healthcare, Gays, Dimocrats, Beasts, And George W.

By: ABM90

ABM90 — Tue, 10 Nov 2009 13:02:08 +0000

How can the messiah accept his ill-gotten gains paycheck for his ten months of wining,dining,hooping,golfing,campaigning,vacationing and spreading BS as a hobby to keep his snoohered followers waiting for their free lunches and stimulus stash?

———————————————————–

You are in: Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton > Travels With the Secretary > Secretary Clinton: 2009 TravelSecretary Clinton: 2009 Travel
-10/30/09 Secretary Clinton: Travel to Europe and Asia, November 8-19, 2009
-10/28/09 Secretary Clinton: Travel to Pakistan, the Middle East, Morocco and Egypt, October 26-November 4, 2009
-10/09/09 Secretary Clinton: Travel to Zurich, London, Dublin, Belfast, Moscow, and Kazan, October 9-15, 2009
-09/21/09 Secretary Clinton: Travel to New York for the United Nations 64th General Assembly, September 21-30, 2009
-08/04/09 Secretary Clinton: Travel to Africa, August 3-14, 2009
-07/17/09 Secretary Clinton: Travel to India and Thailand, July 17-23, 2009
-06/13/09 Secretary Clinton: Travel to Canada, June 13, 2009
-06/03/09 Secretary Clinton: Travel to Cairo, Egypt, June 3-4,2009
-05/31/09 Secretary Clinton: Travel to El Salvador and Honduras, May 31-June 2, 2009
-04/25/09 Secretary Clinton: Travel to the Middle East, April 23-26, 2009
-04/16/09 Secretary Clinton: Travel to Haiti, the Dominican Republic, and Trinidad and Tobago, April 16-19, 2009
-03/31/09 Secretary Clinton: Travel to The Hague for International Conference on Afghanistan and to Europe
-03/25/09 Secretary Clinton: Travel to Mexico, March 25-26, 2009
-03/01/09 Secretary Clinton: Travel to the Middle East and Europe, March 1-7, 2009
-02/15/09 Secretary Clinton: Travel to Asia, February, 15-22, 2009

By: admin

admin — Tue, 10 Nov 2009 13:01:49 +0000

NEW ARTICLE IS UP.

By: Bullets Fly In The Democratic Civil War — Hillary Is 44

Bullets Fly In The Democratic Civil War — Hillary Is 44 — Tue, 10 Nov 2009 13:01:24 +0000

[...] Horses, Women, Healthcare, Gays, Dimocrats, Beasts, And George W. » Home [...]

By: AmericanGal

AmericanGal — Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:38:31 +0000

On Bill and Hillary commenting on the Obama health care plan:

While it’s disgusting that they are doing this, what choice do they have? If they want to preserve Hillary’s chances for further political life and also preserve the good will she is gaining as SOS how could they be critical of the Obama plan? It would be political suicide wouldn’t it?. They currently have to live their political lives within a Democratic party that is largely Kool-Aid infused. I would think that doesn’t give them a lot of options. The Obama Clinton hating White House would use any criticism as an opportunity to exit Hillary from the SOS spot or call her a traitor.

I’m not saying that they are choosing the best actions (As a supporter, I would prefer they remain silent), but unfortunately isn’t that the way politics works?

I find it interesting that, at least so far, Hillary has just given broad support for a health care plan–I haven’t read that she is praising the specifics of Obama’s version–just that she is pleased a health care plan is being considered. I don’t know if Bill is going to give specific support for it or if his speech will also present broad support for the idea of a health care plan–I guess we will have to see what happens. If he does praise the specific plan then I will too be highly disappointed. But again..what are their choices?

Just my two cents…

By: turndownobama

turndownobama — Tue, 10 Nov 2009 11:01:29 +0000

Obama will make Medicare cuts permanent, by veto

h/ no w
abcnews.go.com/Politics/abc-news-exclusive-obama-jobs-health-care-ft/story?id=9033559

“Are you willing to pledge that whatever cuts in Medicare are being made to fund health insurance, one third of it, that you will veto anything that tries to undo that?” Tapper asked.

“Yes,” the president said. “I actually have said that it is important for us to make sure this thing is deficit neutral, without tricks.”

By: gonzotx

gonzotx — Tue, 10 Nov 2009 08:37:25 +0000

SECRETARY CLINTON: You know what, I think Harry and Louise have thought better of what they said 16 years ago. (Laughter.) So I don’t think you’ll see Harry and Louise. You see the tea parties and interrupted town halls, but most Americans over the course of the last 16 years have really understood more about what was at stake in this healthcare debate. It’s not just about those who don’t have insurance. It’s about the quality of your insurance and the cost of your insurance. And for a while, people thought, well, we’ll haggle it through the insurance system itself. But that didn’t work. And so now there’s a readiness that we saw enacted in that close vote in the House, and I think that the senators heard that message.
&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&

Well, that is disgusting!

By: birdgal

birdgal — Tue, 10 Nov 2009 06:14:01 +0000

Lieberman is not toeing the party line.

By: wbboei

wbboei — Tue, 10 Nov 2009 06:10:25 +0000

I bet Rahm is furious that Lieberman went on Fox’s Chris Wallace Show today
—————————–
If that is so, then perhaps it will lead to a heart attack.

By: wbboei

wbboei — Tue, 10 Nov 2009 06:03:03 +0000

the old fashioned way

By: wbboei

wbboei — Tue, 10 Nov 2009 05:46:24 +0000

Something I am writing for another publication which might interest you. It might be titled the state of our disunion, or the winter of our discontent or where ignorant armies clash by night.
———————————————————————————-
(Note: as you can see, the nomination process was a sham. Soros controlled the Party and he made sure that Obama got the nomination. Hillary offered detailed solutions to our nation’s problems, whereas Obama had no real solutions- but oh so much hope. Many well meaning people responded to that emotion, and felt a sense of personal triumph when he took the oath of Office. They never investigated his background, never studied what he did in Illinois, and never dreamed that there was an uber-capitalist behind him pulling his strings. They settled for bread and circuses. Today they continue to defend him because they love him. He is their sun, their moon, their east, their west and nothing else matters. Others, who believed in him, and trusted him to keep his campaign promises, look at him now and wonder what became of the man they voted for. And then there are those who did not vote for him—the ones Chuck Todd would call racists. Many of those people have been bludgeoned into silence by demagogues who brandish the race card. It is all too reminiscent of McCarthy.)

But mainstream media bears the ultimate responsibility for this debacle. They know who Soros is and what he does. After all, Brokaw, Moyers and others sit on his boards. Also, they know from Shakespeare that the fool and the lover are blind. Nevertheless, they passionately embrace Obama, defend him at every turn, savage his opponents, harass private citizens and abdicate their role as journalists. Why have they sold out? First of all, many of them are insecure people. In their world, the first priority is to satisfy their editor, the second priority is to please their peers, the third priority is to titillate their audience, and the last priority is to tell the truth– and by that I mean the whole truth. Are they all that way? No. Thank God, there are a few like Charles Krauthammer who have not sold out. They practice journalism the fashioned old way—with brains and hard work. But that is not what you see at NBC, MSNBC, CNN, NYT, Politico, Time, Newsweek and AP. Those organizations practice a new-fangled journalism where facts are slippery, practices are shoddy, and the herd mentality prevails.

Second, there is the matter of institutional power. For better or for worse, the two prior administrations held them at arm’s-length. Thus, what they saw in Obama was likeability, the promise of access and influence, and the rare opportunity to be part of the governing coalition. Now that is heady stuff. They were tempted the same way Faust was tempted to sell out and they succumbed. A democracy needs honest journalists—not propagandists. Nevertheless, they chose the latter course and now they live with the contradictions every day. The Administration whines whenever they say anything critical and they heel. The only one who does not is FOX. That is why the Administration wants to defrock them. A friend of mine is the former publisher of a periodical which was widely regarded as the best small town newspaper in America; his father was president of the Newspaper Publishers Association; and a pal of Washington Post publisher Ben Bradley. I stayed with him and his brilliant wife during the primary. And the three of us had many discussions on how and why the media came to betray its audience, itself and the journalist standards that once protected the community