Days Of Atonement

On Thanksgiving Day Americans consider and reflect on the past year and give thanks for what they have received. On New Year’s Day, Americans, after consideration and reflection, look forward and plan what they wish to accomplish in 365 days.

American Jews and Jews worldwide have an additional day of reflection called Yom Kippur, the Day of Atonement. Yom Kippur “atones for sins between man and G_d, not for sins against another person”

Obama and Obama supporters should take a page from our Jewish brothers and sisters and atone for what they have inflicted on America and Americans.

* * * * *

We’ll get to Obama supporters shortly, but first and foremost the creature with the most to atone for is Barack Obama.

Obama should atone for his trespasses with a swift and immediate resignation along with a confession of the Gay-bashing, race-baiting and misogyny he employed to grab a position of power and prestige he is unworthy of holding and incapable of performing.

The decency of resignation is not one we expect. The Chicago Clown of Corruption is Copenhagen bound.

Afghanistan policy, where Americans die every day, which Obama ignored every day he was in the U.S. Senate -holding not a single meeting of the Subcommittee with jurisdiction over NATO issues in Afghanistan – is up for grabs and the situation getting desperate but Obama is too busy Copenhagen bound:

The military general credited with capturing Saddam Hussein and killing the leader of al Qaeda in Iraq, Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, says he has spoken with President Obama only once since taking command in Afghanistan.

“I’ve talked to the president, since I’ve been here, once on a VTC ,” Gen. Stanley McChrystal told CBS reporter David Martin in a television interview that aired Sunday.

You’ve talked to him once in 70 days?” Mr. Martin followed up.

“That is correct,” the general replied.

The Chicago Circus of Corruption wants the Clown in Copenhagen to further fleece Chicago citizens.

In Iraq,
“American insiders in Baghdad say the relationship between the top U.S. commander there, Gen. Raymond Odierno, and the top civilian official there, Amb. Christopher Hill, is deteriorating rapidly. Old hands say the chill between the two brings to the bad old days of Sanchez vs. Bremer, when those two unfortunates barely would speak to each other as the American position fell apart in early 2004, along with Iraq itself.” Iraq policy is in difficulty but the Chicago Clown is off to Copenhagen.

Restrictions on abortion funding under the health care insurance scam Obama proposes is up for crucial votes along with the issue of illegal immigrants and participation in the “program”, but Obama the Clown is Copenhagen bound.

The hapless Senate majority leader, Harry Reid says he needs Obama to “arbitrate a number of contentious issues that still threaten to divide liberal and centrist Democrats and derail a final bill” on health care but Obama the Clown is Copenhagen bound.

Why is Obama Copenhagen bound knowing the trip will at the very least distract Big Media and prevent the nation from addressing issues of importance, like Afghanistan, health care, the economy, Iraq, Iranian nuclear weapons, and job creation in the private sector? The answer is that Clowns in the circus are mostly of use to distract attendee attention between acts. Obama the Clown’s cruise to Copenhagen is a publicity stunt to once again distract from the disaster which is Obama.

Why go to Copenhagen with a Joker grin to backslap and waste time on a long fuel guzzling trans-Atlantic trip in order to speak for about 5 minutes out of a 45 minute presentation?

The White House knows that the decision to go before the International Olympic Committee is fraught with political risk: The president could be embarrassed on a world stage if he doesn’t land the games.

Plus, more than a few Americans are surely scratching their heads — with his inbox crowded with a troop request for Afghanistan, a new secret nuclear site in Iran, sky-high unemployment and a health care bill in Congress, does the president really have time for this? [snip]

Political experts also said that there are several potential side benefits to the Chicago effort that could outweigh any political risk. First, Obama will dominate the headlines with a foreign trip with a nonpolitical and popular goal. That will push the contentious health care debate and tricky decisions on how to win the war in Afghanistan, at least for a few hours, out of the news cycle.

The Chicago Clown of Corruption is Copenhagen bound to distract from unpopularity and failure and to bask in Klieg lights and to delude himself with the notion he is a celebrity worth celebrating.

Trash talking, cheap, clueless and sleeveless Michelle Obama will prove in Copenhagen she is a cheap floozy from Chicago:

“Already, the spirited competition has sparked some high-level trash talking. At the G-20 summit in Pittsburgh last week, Michelle Obama sat next to the first lady of Brazil, Marisa Letícia Rocco Casa. “I said, you know, ‘I’m going to hug you now and then I’m going after you in Copenhagen,’” the first lady said. “And she said, ‘You, too.’ So gloves are off.”

Hug first, stab in the back second, is the real Michelle from Chicago.

Michelle and Oprah are going to Copenhagen to do what they do best: back-stab. Obama the Clown is Copenhagen bound to distract, distract, distract:

He’s a man with an endless, worthy to-do list—health care, climate change, bank reform, global capital regulation, AfPak, the Middle East, you name it—but, as yet, no boxes checked “done.” This is a problem that style will not fix. Unless Obama learns to rely less on charm, rhetoric, and good intentions and more on picking his spots and winning in political combat, he’s not going to be reelected, let alone enshrined in South Dakota.

The president’s problem isn’t that he is too visible; it’s the lack of content in what he says when he keeps showing up on the tube. Obama can seem a mite too impressed with his own aura, as if his presence on the stage is the Answer. There is, at times, a self-referential (even self-reverential) tone in his big speeches. They are heavily salted with the words “I” and “my.” (He used the former 11 times in the first few paragraphs of his address to the U.N. last week.) [snip]

Members of Obama’s own party know who Obama is not; they still sometimes wonder who he really is. [snip] Never much of a legislator (and not long a -senator), Obama underestimated the complexity of enacting a major “reform” bill. Letting Congress try to write it on its own was an awful idea. [snip] It’s not like Chicago, where you call a guy who calls a guy who calls Daley, who makes the call. [snip]

Health-care legislation is still weeks, if not months, from passage, and the bill as it stands could well be a windfall for the very insurance and drug companies it was supposed to rein in. Climate-change legislation (a.k.a. cap-and-trade) is almost certainly dead for this year, which means that American negotiators will go empty-handed to the Copenhagen summit in December —pushing the goal of limiting carbon emissions even farther into the distance. In the spring Obama privately told the big banks that he was going to change the way they do business. It was going to be his way or the highway. But the complex legislation he wants to submit to Congress has little chance of passage this year. Doing Letterman again won’t help.

Howard Fineman wrote the above words. Fineman could have informed Americans of “never much of a legislator” and other Obama shortcomings last year. Fineman is far from atoning for his sins with his few critical columns on Obama.

Richard Cohen has a lot to atone for what he has written in the past in praise of Obama and in denigration of Hillary Clinton. Cohen today tries to atone with a wrist-slap:

Sooner or later it is going to occur to Barack Obama that he is the president of the United States. As of yet, though, he does not act that way, appearing promiscuously on television and granting interviews like the presidential candidate he no longer is. The election has been held, but the campaign goes on and on. The candidate has yet to become commander in chief.

Cohen and Fineman are not alone in their need to atone.

* * * * *

Left Talkers are in desperate need of atonement.

One website that is run by well educated lawyers trashed Sarah Palin about her daughter’s behavior and her mother-in-law’s behavior, held a perverse “lottery” to determine when Palin would withdraw, chose Obama because he was the “media darling”, and acually dared to declare Obama will be one of our greatest presidents – comparable to FDR.

The same defense lawyer Left-Talker that chortled when Sarah Palin’s mother-in-law got in trouble with the police, the same defense lawyer Left-Talker that rubbed her legs and speculated that Governor Palin’s resignation came on a Friday because Governor Palin “wouldn’t time the announcement on such a slow news day if she weren’t trying to minimize it“; the same defense lawyer Left-Talker who gossiped and convicted Sarah Palin without evidence (“The Alaska Report says a big, dirty scandal is coming. Another Alaska blog mentions an investigation into her finances and reports the money has been raised to pay for the release of the e-mails in the FOIA case, and it should only be a matter of days before they are released.”) and spends an inordinate amount of time drinking with her handsome son (see how ugly speculation can work Left-Talkers?) is now – defending convicted fugitive from justice Roman Polanski and shouting “Free Roman Polanski”. A true hypocrite in need of atoning.

We are not judging the Polanski case, we are merely pointing out the hypocrisy of a defense lawyer woman (who trashes a woman governor for the actions of a prospective mother-in-law she has no control over), while defending a convicted child rapist. Hypocrite.

The same defense lawyer Left-Talker is also busy acting high minded and “innocent until proven guilty” when it comes to Nabijullah Zazi. If only this contemptible hypocrite would give the same measure of “innocent until proven guilty” towards abused Sarah Palin.

The male Left-Talker who sold out the Democratic nomination process to Big Media and “media darling” Barack the Clown is now grousing about Big Media. Too late, it is time to atone.

And when it comes to hypocrites and those in need of atonement, the name David Sirota immediately stinks up. David Sirota rejoiced when Rahm Emanuel demanded on Meet The Press that Paul Hackett of Ohio withdraw from the Ohio Senate race in 2006. Sirota slimed and smeared and demanded that Paul Hackett get out (click HERE for some of the sordid story; warning the link is to the sulfur website.)

Now Sirota pretends he is outraged at Rahm Emanuel forcing candidates out of elections without a vote or without counting votes. Sirota worships Emanuel when Emanuel thugs out candidates Sirota does not like. Now Sirota, (like the male Left-Talker who is not so keen on Big Media now, but loved the “media darling”) is upset with Emanuel. Now Sirota is lying about his own ugly history of forcing candidates off the ballot.

I’ve made my position on the Emanuel administration’s attempts to crush Democratic primaries pretty plain: Beyond it being a disgusting effort to crush the kind of local democracy Barack Obama used to make Rahm Emanuel president, it also makes Democratic legislative unity even tougher to achieve. Additionally, the aggressiveness of the effort reveals a double-standard: The Emanuel administration that categorically refuses to twist the arms of congresspeople to pass legislation is the same Emanuel administration that is more than happy to break the arms of Democratic primary candidates.

As I said in my last column, that’s the power-worshiping, incumbent-protecting country-club etiquette at work: Just like, say, Tim Russert, would ask upstart presidential candidate Howard Dean much tougher questions than sitting Vice President Dick Cheney, President Emanuel is willing to punch those outside of D.C., but not those inside.

Now, the Denver Post gives us a sense of just how hard those punches are being thrown. The front-page Sunday story details how President Emanuel dispatched former Max Baucus aide and current Vice President Jim Messina to, as the Post says, “try to buy off” former House Speaker Andrew Romanoff (D) with a job before he announced his primary challenge to appointed Sen. Michael Bennet (D).

Sirota loved it when Rahm Emanuel knocked Paul Hackett off the ballot (with Sirota’s help and propaganda) but now Sirota is really really upset:

The recent headlines about President Obama working to crush primary campaigns against Democratic incumbents would be great fodder for a canned column looking at hypocrisy.

Yes, it would be easy to read about the president trying to clear the Empire State’s primary field for appointed Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y., and then pen a screed wondering how that squares with Obama promising to avoid “be(ing) the kingmaker” in local elections.

With the White House citing genteel deference to incumbents as justification for its efforts to stop a Democratic primary against Pennsylvania Sen. Arlen Specter, it would be a cinch to write an essay noting that Obama might never have become a successful politician had he not first taken on incumbents in 1996 and 2000.

Sirota is a hypocrite who condemns hypocrisy. Sirota has much to atone for with his attacks on many candidates – like Hillary Clinton.

Elizabeth Edwards is in desperate need of atonement too. Elizabeth Edwards who trashed Hillary and proclaimed her marriage to be superior to Hillary’s marriage now has the prospect of her husband’s bastard moving on up and into the neighborhood.

As we employ the standards of Left-Talkers, it appears Elizabeth is also trashing her husband’s concubine in various websites using fake names. Elizabeth, if she indeed is “Cherubin” also trashes Obama, while hyping her “Johnny” for jobs. Elizabeth Edwards is in need of atonement.

The New York Times, trashed Bill Clinton over Whitewater and has yet to apologize. The Times trashed Bill Clinton almost daily on its front pages and in editorials. Now the Times admits it has little news value judgment and will atone by reading website blogs.

The New York Times, Elizabeth, John, Sirota, Left-Talkers, Obamas, Dimocrats and all he Hopium addled have a great deal to atone for.

It will be a shonda if they persist in their folly.

It’s time to atone for your deeds fellas.


The Danger Of Obama Weakness

An Israeli attack on Iran nuclear facilities will be a disaster. No Israeli attack on Iran nuclear facilities will be a catastrophe.

Because of Obama weakness the Israelis will have to strike at Iran.

Hillary Clinton understands the need to send clear messages that are understood without any chance of doubt. Hillary sent a message during the 2008 election cycle that was clear. Dimocrats who want to live in a world of unreality attacked Hillary for preventing war by making very clear what American reaction would be to certain Iranian actions.

Arab capitals and Big Media outlets denounced Hillary’s statement as “the foreign policy of the madhouse”. But the real “madhouse” is the weakness displayed by Barack Obama which green lights fringe regimes, like the dubiously elected Iranian government, to make unchallenged threats to the world.

Hillary warned Iran in no uncertain terms:

“I want the Iranians to know that if I’m the president, we will attack Iran (if it attacks Israel),” Clinton said in an interview on ABC’s “Good Morning America.”

“In the next 10 years, during which they might foolishly consider launching an attack on Israel, we would be able to totally obliterate them,” she said.

“That’s a terrible thing to say but those people who run Iran need to understand that because that perhaps will deter them from doing something that would be reckless, foolish and tragic,” Clinton said.

Iran is not afraid of popinjay Obama. The Iranian thugs who faced down their own people in the streets know a weak thug when they see a weak thug. Obama is a weak, cowardly, thug.

Americans and the world now see the danger of Obama weakness as thug states call out the weak thug from Chicago. Americans and the world saw the danger of weakness in the face of thugs, at the Rhineland, decades ago.

Yesterday, weak, dangerous, Obama finally admitted that he knew long ago about Iranian secret nuclear facilities. He did so in Pittsburgh, not before the world, in New York, before nations assembled.

Obama did not confront Iran at the United Nations General Assembly nor at the Security Council – that would have threatened his publicity stunts to bolster his own personal “popularity”. The celebrity clown from Chicago did not want Iranians to think mean things of him and possibly not applaud after his star turn at the U.N.

Obama waited to display his weakness until Pittsburgh. The President of (remember when Americans called the French “surrender monkeys”?) France spoke strongly while Obama cowered and whined:

Flanked by French President Nicolas Sarkozy and Britain’s dead man walking, Prime Minister Gordon Brown, our president offered more uselessly vague rhetoric in response to proof of a major “covert Iranian enrichment facility” and its implications.

Obama’s statement amounted to, Ooooh, I’ll huff, and I’ll puff, and I’ll blow your house down . . . maybe . . . eventually . . . but not really . . . let’s talk . . .

Only Sarkozy made a serious attempt to get the Iranian leadership’s attention, stressing the consistent failure of negotiations and the need for action. He understands that a decade of talking with Tehran brought zero results.

Obama cringed.

Shouldn’t we be ashamed that a French president’s leading the fight to protect Israel and the free world?

There is a duality in Obama. One side of Obama is a thug celebrity who will smear, slime, and war to advance himself and grab the wandering spotlight. Another side of Obama is “an educated fool” (as Bobby Rush called him) who knows he is an educated fool totally unprepared and callow. But educated fool or thug celebrity the result is the same: danger for America and what used to be called “freedom loving peoples of the world”.

Obama’s weakness imperils Americans:

To be fair, Obama’s overwhelmed.

Fatally confident of his powers of persuasion, he’s bewildered that he hasn’t been able to convince the Iranians (or the Palestinians, Russians, Venezuelans, Chinese, etc.) to do what he wants them to do.

So Washington delays. While Iran races toward a nuclear arsenal. [snip]

Ahmadinejad’s boys know what they’re doing. They’ve dispersed their nuclear program across urban areas and deep underground. The network is not only hard to hit — it’s impossible to strike effectively without inflicting thousands of civilian casualties.

These new sites raise the stakes higher still: Attack the plant near Qom and we’ll be seen by Shia Muslims as violating a holy city. Strike those Tehran detonator factories and you get severe collateral damage — plus the probable spread of radioactive material, an instant “dirty bomb.” [snip]

The new and immeasurably dangerous factor in play is religious fanaticism. The doomsday-lust avowed by Ahmadinejad and his supporters shatters every deterrence equation.

Weakness has a strength – it creates a power vacuum which whirls like a destructive tornado. Obama weakness threatens us all.

So now what? Obama will try more talks. We may see half-hearted sanctions — which will be violated right and left. Russia, which profits hugely from dirty trade with Iran, can slip goods across the Caspian Sea or through Azerbaijan and Turkmenistan.

And maritime sanctions are meaningless, unless our president is willing to order our Navy to fire on Chinese-flagged or Venezuelan-flagged merchant vessels.

Think that’s going to happen?

How will it end? With desperate Israeli attacks that do only part of the job, followed by Iranian counterstrikes on Persian Gulf oil facilities, the closure of the Straits of Hormuz and oil above $400 a barrel.

Only the United States can stop Iran’s nuclear program before it’s too late. And this president won’t.

Obama’s weakness threatens us all as much as his thuggish ambitions propel him to do greater damage.

Already Israel is aware of the tornado caused by the American power vacuum created by Obama Weakness and has plans to strike at Iran before Iran and its thug leaders acquire nuclear status.

When the Israeli army’s then-Deputy Chief of Staff Dan Halutz was asked in 2004 how far Israel would go to stop Iran’s nuclear program, he replied: “2,000 kilometers,” roughly the distance been the two countries.

Israel’s political and military leaders have long made it clear that they are considering taking decisive military action if Iran continues to develop its nuclear program. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu warned at the United Nations this week that “the most urgent challenge facing this body is to prevent the tyrants of Tehran from acquiring nuclear weapons.” [snip]

An effective Israeli nuclear strike may not be possible, yet a regional nuclear arms race is a game that Iran can start, but cannot possibly win. Anyone who meets regularly with senior Israeli officials, officers and experts knows that Israel is considering military options, but considering them carefully and with an understanding that they pose serious problems and risks.

The Natanz, Arak and Bushehr nuclear program facilities in Iran will pose difficulties to attack but the plans, if not set, are under advanced development.

Israel has fighters, refueling tankers and precision-guided air-to-ground weapons to strike at all of these targets—even if it flies the long-distance routes needed to avoid the most critical air defenses in neighboring Arab states. It is also far from clear that any Arab air force would risk engaging Israeli fighters. Syria, after all, did not attempt to engage Israeli fighters when they attacked the reactor being built in Syria.

In August 2003, the Israeli Air Force demonstrated the strategic capability to strike far-off targets such as Iran by flying three F-15 jets to Poland, 1,600 nautical miles away. Israel can launch and refuel two to three full squadrons of combat aircraft for a single set of strikes against Iran, and provide suitable refueling. Israel could also provide fighter escorts and has considerable electronic-warfare capability to suppress Iran’s aging air defenses. It might take losses to Iran’s fighters and surface-to-air missiles, but such losses would probably be limited. [snip]

Experts sharply disagree as to whether the Israeli air force could do more than limited damage to the key Iranian facility at Natanz. Some feel it is too deeply underground and too hardened for Israel to have much impact. Others believe that it is more vulnerable than conventional wisdom has it, and Israel could use weapons like the GBU-28 earth-penetrating bombs it has received from the U.S. or its own penetrators, which may include a nuclear-armed variant, to permanently collapse the underground chambers.

No one knows what specialized weapons Israel may have developed on its own, but Israeli intelligence has probably given Israel good access to U.S., European, and Russian designs for more advanced weapons than the GBU-28. Therefore, the odds are that Israel can have a serious impact on Iran’s three most visible nuclear targets and possibly delay Iran’s efforts for several years.

Even among the Huff n’ Puff crowd of PINO websites the description of Obama on other issues is Obama The Impotent. Obama’s weakness threatens us all.

Weakness begets danger.

Obama’s ambitions, inexperience, applause-neediness, and weakness threaten us all.


The Obama Race-Baiting History – And Other Truths Emerge, Part II

The chickens are coming home to roost as reality strikes at the Obama mythical crackpot history. All that ‘I was six years old abroad so I am an expert in international relations and foreign policy is my strong suit so don’t argue with me and call my “no preconditions” stance with regards to Iran “naive” (I’ll meet with Ahmadinejad any time, any place, any where he wants in the first year)’ has now collapsed.

Instead of “no preconditions” meetings with crackpots and Tin Pot Dictators, after “open hands” “clenched fists” words, after insulting American allies like Britain and Israel, Obama has to face the fact that he is in a one man fools paradise. After appeasing Iranian leaders and jutting his jaw at protesters challenging the Tin Pot Dictator and the entire Iranian regime, Obama says “Oops”. It turns out, as the knowledgeable were aware: Iran has “a secret underground plant to manufacture nuclear fuel”.

You just can’t trust a Tin Pot Dictator – like Ahmadinejad.

* * * * *

When, a few weeks ago, we described Obama as The Tin Pot Dictator little did we know that shortly a YouTube video would emerge to confirm our description.

YouTube videos and events aplenty already existed on which we based our article but the latest YouTube now threatens a firestorm.

No firestorm, or much discussion on Big Media (some Hillary sympathetic websites did discuss the revelations), from our Tucker Carlson The Obama Race-Baiting History – And Other Truths Emerge, Part I

There was some discussion of the Tucker Carlson public admission that Obama’s campaign did indeed proposition reporters with scurrilous assertions, lies and false narratives to portray the Clintons as “racists”. D.K. Jamaal wrote:

Carlson admission finally confirms that Obama’s campaign was as divisive, vituperative, heartless, scheming, unethical, malevolent, destructive, and manipulative as many Americans have long believed.

The evidence has long been there – Jesse Jackson’s Kanye-like implication that Hillary did not care about Katrina victims, the campaign’s infamous South Carolina race memo, rumors of how the Obama camp threatened black superdelegates, and the odious “Hillary wants Obama assassinated” story they tried to sell.

But Carlson becomes the first corporate media journalist to actually say, yes, the Obama campaign tried to use me to sell the Hillary-is-racist crap.

D.K. Jamaal bears witness that there was much evidence to the Obama race-baiting history. D.K. Jamaal then asks the vital question:

Carlson is brave for finally telling it like it is, beyond any doubt, that the corporate media has long known Obama to be a race-baiter from day one.

Will any other reporter be honest enough to second what Tucker Carlson revealed?

It will take a while but the truth shall rise. Eventually reporters will report events from the primary and the secret history we have outlined will be filled with stark colors. Eventually even Obama campaign thugs and operatives will turn on each other or demand credit and the secret history of the Obama race-baiting will emerge full-born.

For now, we have to rely on the facts few want to discuss, and sharp analytical minds to put into context events as they unfold. For instance, in Obama The Tin Pot Dictator we wrote:

Time was when Americans could laugh at leaders from other nations who tried to create a cheesy cult of personality. Now we have our own cheesy tin pot rattling “leader”.

That Tin pot dictator mentality is what has raised alarms about Obama’s speech next week aimed at schoolchildren. President John F. Kennedy was a popular president who started a presidential effort aimed at schoolchildren. But the Kennedy efforts were aimed at physical fitness and physical fitness programs not at creation of a cult of personality akin to North Korean “Dear Leader” rallies.

There were no “let’s get physically fit for the glory of the Dear Leader” components from John F. Kennedy. Attempts to link physical fitness or sound educational goals to the greater glory of “Dear Leader” abound in world history. Hitler youth programs, Leninist state glorification camps, Maoist “Red Book” wavers, dozens of African leadership cults, Red Kerchief programs from the socialist world, all are examples of the glorification of the state and the “Leader” via school children programs.

Americans are waking up to their own “cheesy cult of personality” for Dear Leader. The evidence was always there but few wanted to open their eyes and see. Few wanted to see the Obama cult of personality we have written about for so long. There was evidence during the campaign:

Perhaps because it was a political campaign some dismissed it as wise politics. To us it reeked of Nike sneakers and comet tails and Marshall Appelwhite. It reeked of Susan Atkins. It reeked of dangerous leader cult in national government.

To us it is time to look at that old man who bristles at the cult and time to put aside Godwin’s law lest we forget.

At B. Bernice Young Elementary School in Burlington, New Jersey the indoctrination has begun.

The song is a dark reference to “Jesus Loves The Little Children”. The video was posted by Charisse Carney-Nunes the author of “I Am Barack Obama”. Some liberals who should know better, who would scream if George W. Bush was the object of adoration (we would certainly object too) prefer to say “nothing new”, “this is fine”. No, this is not fine. This is indoctrination and it is ugly.

There’s a reason why Americans posthumously honor presidents by naming ships or buildings in their honor. Americans do not engage in monument building for living leaders. We are not a nation of Tin Pot Dictator worshipers.

Or at least we used to not be a nation of Tin Pot Dictator worshipers.

In February of 2008 we quoted from the German newsmagazine Der Spiegel:

The rise of democratic frontrunner Barack Obama signifies an alarming victory of style over substance. Not unlike the dot-com hype, his campaign promises more than he can deliver. The one thing his voters can count on is that they will ultimately be disappointed.

Democratic presidential contender Barack Obama reminds many people of former President John F. Kennedy or civil rights leader Martin Luther King. But when I hear him speak, I have to think of the crazy days of the New Economy.

It was a magical time, even for the most levelheaded of business executives. For several years, wild promises seemed to be the most valuable currency in circulation. Profits? No big deal! Experience? Unnecessary! Realism? More of an obstacle than anything else. While some entrepreneurs undoubtedly had realistic business models and administrative talent, most of them were simply peddling ideas.

Der Spiegel wrote along with us, in February 2008, the truth about Obama and an Obama presidency:

Nevertheless, if Obama is elected he will eventually be forced to disappoint his voters. Politics in a democratic society is a balancing of interests, not a revivalist meeting. It takes finesse, experience and power to transform ideas into reality. Hope and optimism can enhance these qualities, but they cannot replace them. Obama’s message is more of a promise to heal the nation than a campaign platform.

The future Obama is promising seems foggy and indistinct. He wants to change the rules of engagement in politics, but he neglects to explain how and in what direction. He wants to write a new page in the history books, but what handwriting does he plan to use to make his entry? He wants to drive out lobbyists, but if he does, who will champion the interests of union members, war veterans and chemical corporations? He wants to negotiate with the world’s dictators, but to what end, exactly?

In fact, Obama’s most dangerous land mines are hidden in foreign policy. [snip]

And Osama bin Laden and Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad would be the real winners of the 2008 American presidential election.

On top of all that, Obama, in an effort to show strength, has come up with a new, and in some ways exclusive, theater for the US armed forces. He talks about military operations in the nuclear power Pakistan, operations that he, as commander-in-chief, would order even without the approval of the United Nations. That is “the war we need to win,” he says again and again.

But in reality a military campaign in Pakistan would be lunacy, even if many in the American media have chosen to studiously ignore Obama’s comments. A comparison with President John F. Kennedy, who was 43 when he was elected, reveals that Kennedy was in fact unenthusiastic about going to war in Vietnam. It was a war the inexperienced President slid into, and if he was a war president, it was by accident and not design.

Der Spiegel, a German magazine, has special insight into the politics of despair:

But there is no room for thoughtfulness in the turbulent world of Obamania. Hillary Clinton, his rival in the fight for the Democratic nomination, suffers from the same problems as traditional companies in the automotive and engineering industries did when confronted with the hype of the New Economy. She is out of touch with his supporters. She uses language to explain, while Obama uses rhetoric to intoxicate. She tells voters what she is bringing to the table. He tells them what they can become. If Clinton is a solid stock, Obama is an option. If she’s a secure investment, he is speculation.

When the New Economy reached its conclusion, people suddenly realized that their hopes were dashed and their cravings for quick riches left unfulfilled. In 2002, Worldcom’s stock price fell to less than 10 cents.

If democracy functions only half as well as the market economy, the Obama bubble will burst. The burning question is: When? Will it happen before the Democratic nomination this August — or not until afterwards?

The Obama bubble is bursting much too late. But the truth about Obama continues to emerge. The Obama Race-baiting history and other truths continue to emerge.

Those truths are getting more and more dangerous, not less.


The Obama Race-Baiting History – And Other Truths Emerge, Part I

Obama’s lies and race-baiting are catching up to him. Since April 2007 we documented how Obama, via a whisper campaign, background leaks, and anonymous memoranda, smeared Bill and Hillary Clinton. Although what we wrote was the obvious truth, no one in Big Media, none of the Big Media personalities, was willing to go on the record on a broadcast television show to speak about the Obama dirty mud politics.

Yesterday Tucker Carlson finally broke down and confirmed that yes indeed, the duo he hates – Bill and Hillary Clinton were purposefully smeared by race-baiting Obama and his campaign operatives. Obama thugs continue to race-bait.

Here’s Tucker Carlson on Obama race-baiting and the smearing of Bill and Hillary Clinton:

Our transcript of Tucker Carlson’s remarks:

Tucker Carlson: “For Barack Obama to say that the media has taken the low road when many of his allies have accused his opponents of racism… and where was he when they did? When Clyburn of South Carolina accused opponents of racism… when Charlie Rangel did the same… when Governor Paterson of New York… you heard not a word from Barack Obama.

So, you know, it’s a little much for him to claim that the media is stoking this race talk.

[snip – discussion of Joe Wilson and the definition of “news”.]

But let me just say, very clearly, it was the Obama campaign that first bought up the race question. It was the Obama people who smeared the Clintons as racists, Bill and Hillary Clinton. They made the case to reporters off-the-record, including me, that the Clintons were racists. They started this.

So for him to get up with a straight face and say the media is bringing this race issue up… No, it was your campaign that started this.

Greta Van Susteren: How did they bring it up?

Tucker Carlson: By this whisper campaign. That Hillary Clinton and Bill Clinton were somehow opposing Barack Obama because they did not like the fact he was black. And that various statements they made, remember Hillary Clinton famously said that of course it was Lyndon Johnson who signed the Civil Rights Act, you know. Martin Luther King might have advocated for it but it was the president who signed it.

Somehow that became a racist statement according to allies of Barack Obama. He didn’t tell them to be quiet then. He allowed that to happen. Allowed, I think, the slur against the Clintons to fester. That they were somehow animated by bigotry was outrageous. And he did nothing to clear the air.

So, I don’t know… I don’t want to be lectured by him, at this stage, as a member of the media, in a sanctimonious way. That somehow we’re perpetuating unhealthy race talk. That’s nonsense.”

Tim Russert attacked this website on his Meet The Press “news” show. As with the Imus scandal, Russert pretended not to know. Russert pretended that he did not know Imus for years traded on homophobia and racially charged statements and comedy routines.

On July 1, 2007 Tim Russert attacked this website. Russert pretended not to know that Obama was a dirt peddler. We were attacked for telling the truth. Russert quoted us by quoting attacks on us:

‘Senator Barack Obama (D- Rezko)’”—a man who gave money to Obama and Obama has returned it—“‘is busy lately lying about President Bill Clinton’” and “’attacking entire communities.’ … The Obama campaign is ‘still posing as innocents incapable of doing anything unsavory even as evidence mounts unsavory is their favorite dish.’”

We were right. “Unsavory” is the favorite Obama dish.

Russert quoted this website but did not admit we were right and Russert knew we were right because Russert and other Big Media distorters of the truth like Chuck Todd were recipients of the Obama smear campaign.

We wrote on June 15, 2007: Obama’s Dirty Mud Politics:

The Barack Obama campaign has been caught peddling dirt against Hillary and Bill Clinton. Obama is desperate to rescue his failing incompetent campaign so he is slinging mud.

No surprise, that is how Chicago Obama has always operated. Obama talks about running a clean campaign but he is a dirt peddler.

According to the New York Times and amplified in a Talking Points Memo post, Obama got caught in his usual anonymous mud-slinging:

“We’ve just obtained an email that shows that the Obama campaign yesterday circulated a negative, and ultimately false, story about Bill Clinton – that he allegedly made money giving a speech on September 11, 2006.”

There were also memos smearing East-Asians and Hillary as the Senator from Punjab.

We documented the race-baiting and the anonymous smears since April 2007. Now, finally, a Big Media mouthpiece confirms that Obama race-baited and Big Media knew it.

Obama was a race-baiter and profited from race-baiting.

Obama is still a race-baiter and seeks to profit from race-baiting while publicly denouncing race-baiting.

Obama is a race-baiter.

It is long past time for Big Media to admit that Obama is a race-baiter, not a victim of race-baiting.

Obama is a race-baiter.


Whatever Happened To Baby Jane?

Baby Jane Hudson is living in the White House. Her stage name is now Barack Obama.

Film fans will recall the garish Bette Davis Hollywood horror about a very aged elderly former child star who cannot let go of the spotlight of earlier days and yearns to return to the glory days of center stage. Like Baby Jane Hudson, Obama is unwilling to forgo the spotlight or the warming dream which is the Klieg lit stage.

As “cold” and “ungrateful” Michelle Obama shops for her “fashion icon” clothes at the hospital emergency room and her “fashion forward” accessories at auto supply stores her “selfish” and “careerist” Baby Jane Husband will continue to oppress the nation with ceaseless publicity stunt appearances.

Caroline Kennedy Barack Obama is Baby Jane Hudson:

* * * * *

Maybe Barack Obama is a racist or maybe Obama just does not like other black men, or maybe Obama wants to be the only (half) African-American male on the political stage but, as we wrote yesterday, Obama is out to get rid of African-American New York Governor David Paterson – after bouncing Illinois successor Senator Roland Burris, another African-American male off the stage. What does Obama have against black men? Should Deval Patrick be worried that Baby Jane will start to kick him soon too?

We don’t know the answers to the above. We do know that Governor Paterson is defiant and intends to run – just like Joe Sestak against Obama Republican favorite Benedict Arlen Specter in Pennsylvania.

Maybe David Letterman, who will donate the full hour of his show to Obama tonight, will ask the Baby Jane Husband about Governor Paterson and throw Baby Jane Obama off message – again.

Remember, the message is supposed to be about health insurance and to “razzle-dazzle” Americans from finding out Obama plans to steer billions of IRS enforced dollars to the insurance companies. Obama is supposed to talk about health insurance because as George Will channels Baby Jane Obama: ““Nothing wrong with the idea. It’s the packaging that’s wrong. People have seen too little of me.

If Obama refuses to confess his thugs are out to get Paterson, there is still the possibility of more Obama boobery. Maybe David Letterman will witness another Obama “special Olympics” blooper which Big Media will help cover up or explain away.

Maybe Dave will ask Obama about his “read my lips, no new taxes” on the middle class pledge?

In the most contentious exchange of President Barack Obama’s marathon of five Sunday shows, he said it is “not true” that a requirement for individuals to get health insurance under a key reform plan now being debated amounts to a tax increase.

But he could look it up — in the bill.

Page 29, sentence one of the bill introduced by Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus (D-Mont) says: “The consequence for not maintaining insurance would be an excise tax.

And the rest of the bill is clear that the Finance Committee does, in fact, consider it a tax: “The excise tax would be assessed through the tax code and applied as an additional amount of Federal tax owed.

The bill requires every American, with few exceptions, to carry health insurance. To enforce this individual mandate, the Senate Finance Committee created the excise tax as a penalty for people who don’t have insurance – and it can run as much as $3,800 a year per family.

The House bill also refers to the penalties for not carrying insurance as a tax. It calls for a “tax on individuals without acceptable health care coverage” and amends the tax code to implement it.

The questions from ABC’s George Stephanopoulos highlighted a politically dangerous new aspect of the health reform debate for Obama – as critics from Republican leaders to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce say his reform proposals amount to a middle-class tax increase. Obama promised during the campaign that Americans earning less than $250,000 a year would not see any tax increases from an Obama administration.

Maybe Dave could ask Obama about another category of Obama lies such as the Obama lies of 2008 versus the Obama lies of 2009. Here’s a video for Dave of resource material if he decides to ask a non-fluff question:

Because he is in showbiz David Letterman well understands faded stars clinging bitterly to the Klieg lights. Perhaps Dave will ask Obama about his faded glory and how world leaders have contempt for Obama.

Maybe Dave will ask Obama why the protesters at the G-8, or is it now G-10, or G-20 will get respect from Dimocrats but the Tea Party protesters are denounced and ridiculed and disrespected? That’s right, later this week (September 24-25) in Pittsburgh Obama will be mouthing more words in front of the Klieg lights to guffaws and sotto voce insults from world leaders (after Obama sits cozily with Libyan leader Moammar Gaddafi of Lockerbie infamy at the United Nations Security Council) at the G-20 meeting.

Please Dave, ask Obama about his craving need for publicity and publicity stunts and “the people have seen too little of me” mentality. Please Dave, amuse us with with the showbiz relevant “overexposed” question:

The White House doesn’t buy the notion that President Obama, who appeared on five talk shows Sunday and is heading next for David Letterman’s couch, could be wearing out his welcome on the tube.

Sure, this is a president who has dissected basketball brackets on ESPN, gone for burgers with Brian Williams, showed Steve Kroft his swing set, dissed Kanye West (off the record) with CNBC and ordered a general to shave Stephen Colbert’s head. By that standard, Obama’s Sunday blitz was a mere throat-clearing that, as it turned out, produced little in the way of big news. And some journalists — even as they continue to clamor for access — say he is diluting the product. [snip]

So did Obama score?

While the White House plan was for Obama to focus primarily on health care and Afghanistan, he broke no new ground on either subject, repeating points he has made many times.

That’s a nice way of saying “Obama is a bore.” Celebrity Obama is a starlet with no new films to promote but who wants to appear on TV chat shows anyway just to feel the Klieg light heat.

Baby Jane Hudson or Norma Desmond – as we have compared Obama to before?

Norma Obama

For sure Americans are tired of Obama and his craving need to get attention.

Baby Jane Hudson or Norma Desmond?

Both were dragged off stage by the police.

Obama deserves nothing less than to be dragged off the stage – screaming.


Treachery, Fear, And Loathing, In New York

Publicity stunts, bread and Chicago circus style, are on tap today. Barack Obama will bathe himself in his adored Klieg lights as he appears via tape on all the Sunday morning political chat shows (except for Fox News). These appearances will be publicity stunts, ostensibly to promote health care insurance reform, but only someone who wants to believe Circus Queen and Tinkerbell need applause to live is still befuddled that health care is really on the menu.

Obama will appear on Big Media broadcast network outlets today to pretend to fight for something that is long dead. Universal health care reform died in Denver in August 2008. Barack Obama Is and Was the Enemy of Health Care Reform. Perhaps Big Media will ask Obama about his plots and schemes to kill health care reform in Illinois, but somehow we doubt the unmentionable will be mentioned.

Obama this week will also tour New York City and do his best to politically assassinate Governor David Paterson, make Israel defenseless, and hide the obvious contempt world leaders have towards the Tinkerbell president.

* * * * *

The New York Times has a front page story on how Obama wants to throttle the African-American Governor of New York. Obama is a “racist”. Readers of Big Pink will not be surprised by the Times story because we have already written about the machinations of Chuck Schumer.

Chuck Schumer intends to get reelected easily and with big majorities and no one will stand in his way if he can help it. Chuck sees the problems Dimocrats face in 2010 and he will take no chances. Chuck will not go the way of Boxer or Reid or Dodd with tough reelection campaigns – not if he can help it.

And so Chuck Schumer, the U.S. Senator from New York is now working with labor unions and Dimocrats to get rid of African-American David Paterson.

Chuck Schumer hates Andrew Cuomo, the likely David Paterson replacement, but Chuck knows reelection will be easier with Cuomo at the top of the ticket than with barely double digits Paterson.

And remember, Andrew Cuomo cannot be the one to force Paterson out.

Today, the New York Times follows up on our reporting:

President Obama has sent a request to Gov. David A. Paterson that he withdraw from the New York governor’s race, fearing that Mr. Paterson cannot recover from his dismal political standing, according to two senior administration officials and a New York Democratic operative with direct knowledge of the situation.

The decision to ask Mr. Paterson to step aside was proposed by political advisers to Mr. Obama, but approved by the president himself, one of the administration officials said.

“Is there concern about the situation in New York? Absolutely,” the second administration official said Saturday evening. “Has that concern been conveyed to the governor? Yes.”

The political abortionist at the White House is Rahm Emanuel (ask Paul Hackett or Carolyn Maloney). The abortion is at the request of Chuck Schumer. The New York Times quotes the unnamed “political advisers” and reveals that it was African-American Representative Gregory W. Meeks of Queens who delivered the dead fish to Paterson.

The New York Times discusses the danger to Dimocrats in Congress and the state legislature in 2010. Governor Paterson is described as “resistant”. There is also fear of Rudy Giuliani running for Governor sparking armies of voters to the polls which would endanger any and all Dimocrats running in New York State.

Readers of Big Pink know U.S. Senator Schumer is the hand forcing Paterson out. Readers of Big Pink also know that Andrew Cuomo, because of his run against African-American Carl McCall years ago, cannot again challenge African-American Governor Paterson. Forget “content of one’s character”, this is skin color privilege Obama style. It’s “get a black to kill a black politics” and Obama is perfect for the job. According to the Times, Obama “could give them cover to abandon Mr. Paterson and endorse another candidate, most likely Attorney General Andrew M. Cuomo”. African-Americans will once again be taught the lesson they refused to accept in 2008: Obama cannot be trusted.

Readers of Big Pink will also recall (the New York Times gets this all wrong) that it was Chuck Schumer who El Kabonged Caroline Kennedy because he needed someone from above the Tappen Zee bridge to run on the ticket and Caroline Kennedy also would be a privileged attention getter he would have to babysit for two years.

By the way, Kirsten Gillibrand might have injured herself politically by this past week’s support of ACORN. Gillibrand was only one of seven Senators who supported ACORN continuing to get taxpayer money. This is sure to be a campaign issue – one which will not help Gillibrand – especially because she will have to explain why Chuck Schumer voted to block ACORN from taxpayer funds. Gillibrand will also have to explain why Governor Paterson supports an investigation of ACORN and has frozen current and future contracts with ACORN. Former ACORN lawyer Obama could not possibly be happy with Paterson blocking money to his thugs.

* * * * *

The New York Times today also writes what we wrote about months ago. World Leaders And North Korea To Barack Obama: Sucker discussed the contempt world leaders have towards Obama.

The BOob is a pushover – that is the message from Barack Obama’s European vacation. The news from Asia is not much better as North Korea sizes up Obama and sees a dwarf.

World leaders sized up Obama and decided he is a celebrity wannabee. So world leaders gave Obama the soul craving celebrity he wants for himself and then smartly picked the pockets of Uncle Sam while Obama grinned.

This is all in keeping with the Obama history of self-agrandizement and doing nothing, zero, for anyone else. During the European Vacation Obama backslapped as if he was back at Harvard University bamboozling conservatives and liberals in order to advance himself. During the European Vacation Obama grinned and laughed and cameras popped but Americans were about as comforted as Obama’s freezing Chicago constituents. During the European Vacation Obama insulted America in order to make himself more popular.

Today, the New York Times, politely restates what we wrote so clearly months ago:

Foreign counterparts flock to meet with him, and polls show that people in many countries feel much better about the United States.

But eight months after his inauguration, all that good will so far has translated into limited tangible policy benefits for Mr. Obama. As much as they may prefer to deal with Mr. Obama instead of his predecessor, George W. Bush, foreign leaders have not gone out of their way to give him what he has sought.

European allies still refuse to send significantly more troops to Afghanistan. The Saudis basically ignored Mr. Obama’s request for concessions to Israel, while Israel rebuffed his demand to stop settlement expansion. North Korea defied him by testing a nuclear weapon. Japan elected a party less friendly to the United States. Cuba has done little to liberalize in response to modest relaxation of sanctions. India and China are resisting a climate change deal. And Russia rejected new sanctions against Iran’s nuclear program even as Mr. Obama heads into talks with Tehran.

Obama is a boob and foreign leaders know it. The New York Times puts a soft Kleig light on the issue, but Obama is a boob is a boob.

For an administration whose officials regularly boast of having what they call “the best brand in the world,” there is what Stephen Sestanovich calls growing “frustration with what other countries are prepared to contribute to advancing supposedly common interests.” Personal relations are important, said Mr. Sestanovich, a former Clinton administration ambassador with ties to the current team, but national interests still dominate. “That’s what American presidents generally discover,” he said.

That’s old reality. Now we have the new Hopium reality and the only thing that matters is Obama getting the publicity and attention he wants and… God Damn America. The chickens are coming home to roost.

James K. Glassman, who served as Mr. Bush’s last under secretary of state for public diplomacy and public affairs and now leads the former president’s new research institute, said popularity only went so far. “I wouldn’t say it’s not important to be well liked. It is important. But there are other factors involved,” he said. “What you need to do is find out where you have mutual interests.” [snip]

“The problem is he’s asking for roughly the same things President Bush asked for and President Bush didn’t get them, not because he was a boorish diplomat or a cowboy,” said Peter D. Feaver, a former adviser to Mr. Bush now at Duke University. “If that were the case, bringing in the sophisticated, urbane President Obama would have solved the problem. President Bush didn’t get them because these countries had good reasons for not giving them.”

In other words, Russia’s national interests did not change just because Mr. Obama arrived on the scene. India and China still worry about the economic impact of curbing greenhouse gas emissions. Europeans may like Mr. Obama but most of them still oppose the war in Afghanistan.

We’ve argued for years that Lord Palmerston was right about foreign policy but the Hopium addled and Dumb White People, in their Hopium dens and even at the New York Times, argued it was Obama’s “face” that would change the world and lead to chants from celestial choirs. Well, welcome to the world of reality at Lord Palmerston quoting Big Pink.

“Nations have no permanent friends or allies, they only have permanent interests.”

Obama this week will also host a publicity stunt featuring Benyamin Netanyahu and someone who might or might not represent Palestinians. It’s just a publicity stunt. It’s a publicity stunt for Klieg light loving Obama but it’s just a publicity stunt:

“The meeting does not mean negotiations,” a spokesman for President Mahmoud Abbas said after the White House announced the first encounter between Abbas and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu since the latter took office in March.

The summit will take place on Tuesday in New York during the U.N. General Assembly, U.S. officials said. They called it a mark of the president’s personal commitment to Middle East peace but played down the prospect of major immediate developments. [snip]

However, neither side has shown any shift away from the deadlock that was evident on Friday when Obama’s special envoy George Mitchell completed a week shuttling around the region.

Each blamed the other for a failure to re-launch talks that were suspended in December while Israel and Hamas fought in the Gaza Strip. Many analysts doubt Obama’s ability to end six decades of conflict in his quest to stabilise the Middle East.

Israel welcomed a meeting “without preconditions”. But Abbas spokesman Nabil Abu Rdainah repeated Palestinian demands, echoed by Washington since Obama took office in January, that Netanyahu should halt settlement expansion before full-blown talks resume.

Nations have interests and zero interest in fluffing Obama more than with Kleig lights. Just pat him on the head and make him happy but do nothing. Foreign leaders have taken the measure of Obama and he is a dwarf.

And whatever happened to that Iran deadline Obama had set? Nothing. Obama is a boob and a joke and foreign leaders know it. Just pat him on the head and make him happy but do nothing.

* * * * *

Hillary Clinton is respected around the world and in New York. Obama is not respected anywhere.

Treachery, Fear, And Loathing, In New York will be displayed this week. And laughter, there’s always the laughter as more and more realize Obama is a boob.

This morning he is blitzing the airwaves, giving interviews to all America’s main television stations.

But for what? Mr Obama has tactics a plenty – calm and patient engagement with unpleasant regimes, finding common interests, appealing to shared values – but where is the strategy? What, exactly, did “Change you can believe in” – the hallmark slogan of his campaign – actually mean?

The President’s domestic critics who accuse him of being the sinister wielder of a socialist master-plan are wide of the mark. The man who has run nothing more demanding than the Harvard Law Review is beginning to look out of his depth in the world’s top job. His credibility is seeping away, and it will require concrete achievements rather than more soaring oratory to recover it.

In New York this week Obama will try to recover the achievements in reality he never had.

All Obama will find in New York is Fear and Loathing for his boobery.

All Obama will provide in New York is Treachery.


The Tears Of A Clown

Nancy Pelosi, the person we dubbed “the Katherine Harris of this election cycle” in 2008, oozed toxic fluid from her eyeslits yesterday.

Was it Milk? Harvey Milk, that Nancy Pelosi referred to when she supposedly recalled events in San Francisco in the 1970s? Was it brave Harvey Milk from that old school of Gay-American leader who cared more for his community than for the do-nothing oppressors in the Democratic Party who oozed good sounding words but precious few actions in support of the Gay community?

Or was Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi inciting racial hatred? Was Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi calling forth assassins which would make her President by succession if the two above her would disappear in blood? Are we being unfair? Hillary Clinton was accused of calling forth assassins when she recalled the murder of Robert Kennedy. Why cannot we suppose that Nancy, by the logic of Obama Dimocrats, is calling forth assassins?

Was Nancy Pelosi weeping out of shame for her unwillingness to do anything as Speaker of the House for Gay-Americans? We can only imagine what Harvey Milk would have said about the French wave of the hand with which Dimocrats, in total control of the U.S. Senate and a strong majority in the House, have dismissed Gay-Americans. Bill Clinton two decades ago and with far less Democrats in Congress fought for Gay-Americans — and it was Democrats who supported Obama in the primaries (Sam Nunn especially) in 2008 that along with Colin Powell fought against Bill Clinton and Gay-Americans.

Nothing has been done by the creature Speaker from San Francisco for Gay-Americans. And we have to ask: Where are the “die-ins” at the Speakers office by Gay-Americans? There have been no protests targeting Nancy Pelosi because the Gay-American “leaders” have sold out their community to the benefit of Barack Obama and Nancy Pelosi.

Where is that other clown? Where is that gay-bashing clown? Where is Bozo Barack the Clown?

We remember Barack the gay-bashing clown inciting and exploiting anti-gay African-Americans in South Carolina and doing precious little to block California’s anti-gay Proposition 8.

Chicago Clown

* * * * *

On November 6, 2008 we discussed Barack’s World:

During the primary Barack Obama organized a gay-bashing tour exploiting African-American homophobia to his benefit. On election day that homophobia continued.

Proposition 2 in California passed on Tuesday. Proposition 2 benefited farm animals. Proposition 2 protects pregnant pigs, calves and hens as well as any animal in an enclosed area. California farm animals have their rights enhanced in Barack World. California Gay-Americans are sent to the Obama slaughter house.

Proposition 8, with big help from Obama supporters passed in California. Many of those Obama supporters that supported Proposition 8 were African-Americans who voted for Proposition 8 by 70%. Obama said nary a word against proposition 8. Obama’s voice was employed by supporters of Proposition 8 in robocalls to win support for Proposition 8. The Obama South Carolina gay-bashing tour echoed in California.

Many African-American Obama supporters who wept and gloried in the end of racism in America turned on Gay-Americans. [Some wonderful African-Americans fought against Proposition 8 with the same strength that some African-Americans supported Hillary.] Obama said nary a word against the bigotry.

Gay-Americans: Welcome to Reality. .

Welcome to Barack’s World.

And let’s not forget Rick Warren and Benjamin Nzimbi and Obama’s “Christian views”:

I’m a Christian. And so, although I try not to have my religious beliefs dominate or determine my political views on this issue, I do believe that tradition, and my religious beliefs say that marriage is something sanctified between a man and a woman.”

Obama proclaimed himself a Christian when it was convenient and for his self-advancement. Obama was pro-gay-marriage when it was convenient and for his self-advancement. Obama was/is anti-gay-marriage when it is convenient and for his self-advancement. Repeat and repeat: Obama can’t be trusted… he simply can’t be trusted by friend nor foe.

African-Americans can be Gay too but Bozo Barack the Clown does not seem to understand that.

* * * * *

Speaker Clown Nancy Pelosi oozed something out of her eyes yesterday.

It was hypocrisy.

Save your toxic tears Nancy.


The Obama Health Plan Obama Supporters Do Not Want To Discuss

Almost two years ago exactly, on September 24, 2007, we discussed the Obama Health Care Plan Obama Supporters Do Not Want To Discuss in an article called “Reality Based Community”.

We have recently pointed out repeatedly that for all the words and publicity stunts staged this year Barack Obama has not actually submitted a health care plan, let alone an Universal Health Care Plan.

What we do have at the moment is a bunch of mish-mash proposals from four (soon to be five) committees in the U.S. Senate and U.S. House Of Representatives. The five plans are as welcome to the health care debate as the Ebola virus is to a school full of young children.

Almost two years ago we wrote what we will write about again today and what we will write about again and again: The Obama Health Plan Obama Supporters Do Not Want To Discuss.

* * * * *

Obama Supporters Do Not Want To Discuss the Obama history on health care as described by a Big Media outlet in 2007. Ordinarily, Big Media, PINOs, and Dimocrats would race to research the history of those proposing major changes to any policy. But a strange blindness, a willful blindness afflicts Big Media, PINOs and Dimocrats when it comes to Obama. Big Media, PINOs and Dimocrats, do not want to look at Barack Obama’s history on health care.

Big Media, PINOs and Dimocrats expressed disbelief and shock when, after initial White House denials followed by proof, the juicy deal between Obama and Big PhaRma was exposed last month.

The history of the deal Barack Obama fellated from Big PhaRma was very ugly. Not only was the union between Obama and Big PhaRma ugly, it was a consensual affair with Billy Tauzin – a man Obama had whipped with denunciations during the election campaigns of 2008.

To add to the shock and disbelief from Big Media, PINOs and Dimocrats, the secret wedding of Obama and Big PhaRma was consummated in February of this year when Obama was riding high in public opinion polls and had no need to get on his knees before Big PhaRma. The details of the unholy union became known in August when Obama’s false pregnancy did not result in a health care reform plan baby.

The Barack Obama Health Care Plan Obama Supporters Do Not Want to Discuss ironically enough was published by Big Media outlet The Boston Globe on September 23, 2007. The elemental discussion which detail by detail replicates what thus far has happened this year is not however discussed now by The Boston Globe nor any other Big Media outlet, nor by PINOs, nor by Dimocrats.

Here is what The Boston Globe wrote then which is not discussed now by Obama and his fluffers:

When Barack Obama and fellow state lawmakers in Illinois tried to expand healthcare coverage in 2003 with the “Health Care Justice Act,” they drew fierce opposition from the insurance industry, which saw it as a back-handed attempt to impose a government-run system.

Over the next 15 months, insurers and their lobbyists found a sympathetic ear in Obama, who amended the bill more to their liking partly because of concerns they raised with him and his aides, according to lobbyists, Senate staff, and Obama’s remarks on the Senate floor.

The writer of The Boston Globe article, Scott Helman, understood that the fight in Illinois in 2004 “illustrates how Obama, during his eight years in the Illinois Senate” conducted business. Writes Helman, in the article that should inform those concerned about true universal health care reform:

But it also shows how Obama’s own experience in lawmaking involved dealings with the kinds of lobbyists and special interests he now demonizes on the campaign trail.

Obama has tried to distinguish himself from rival Hillary Clinton by criticizing her ties to lobbyists and special interests, and, unlike her, refusing to take contributions from federal lobbyists and political action committees.

Hillary was attacked by Obama and his Hopium dealing thugs because she publicly stated she understood that all sides had to be considered in policy discussions, but that there would be no “celestial choirs”, just a fight for core Democratic values and principles. Hillary understood when to stand on common ground and when to stand her ground. Obama gets on the ground:

On one side were healthcare advocates, eager to capitalize on the Democrats having won control of the General Assembly and the governor’s office. On the other were most insurers, who worked vigorously to sink the bill. Obama was in the middle, trying to reconcile a range of agendas to get a viable plan signed into law.

The bill originally called for a “Bipartisan Health Care Reform Commission” to implement a program reaching all 12.4 million Illinois residents. The legislation would have made it official state policy to ensure that all residents could access “quality healthcare at costs that are reasonable.” Insurers feared that language would result in a government takeover of healthcare, even though the bill did not explicitly say that.

By the time the legislation passed the Senate, in May 2004, Obama had written three successful amendments, at least one of which made key changes favorable to insurers.

Most significant, universal healthcare became merely a policy goal instead of state policy – the proposed commission, renamed the Adequate Health Care Task Force, was charged only with studying how to expand healthcare access. In the same amendment, Obama also sought to give insurers a voice in how the task force developed its plan.

For all the Obama flowery words the treacherous snake is always ‘neath the flower. The goal Obama killed then was “quality healthcare at costs that are reasonable”. What we know of current plans is that the costs will be unreasonable and that “quality” is not to be mentioned. The transfer of wealth to insurance companies with the IRS as the Chicago style fee payment enforcer terrorizing citizens on behalf of the insurance companies is the current Obama Hoped for Change.

What is now, is what was – in Illinois:

Lobbyists praised Obama for taking the insurance industry’s concerns into consideration.

“Barack is a very reasonable person who clearly recognized the various roles involved in the healthcare system,” said Phil Lackman, a lobbyist for insurance agents and brokers. Obama “understood our concern that we didn’t want a predetermined outcome.”

In one attempt at a deal, Obama approached the Campaign for Better Health Care with insurers’ concerns, asking if the group would consider a less stringent mandate than requiring the state to come up with a universal healthcare plan. The coalition decided not to bend, said Jim Duffett, the group’s executive director.

“The concept of the Health Care Justice Act was to bring the sides – the different perspectives and stakeholders – to the table,” Duffett said. “In this situation, Obama was being a conduit from the insurance industry to us.”

Obama later watered down the bill after hearing from insurers and after a legal precedent surfaced during the debate indicating that it would be unconstitutional for one legislative assembly to pass a law requiring a future legislative assembly to craft a healthcare plan.

Obama watered down strong medicine into weak sugar water. Placebo Obama pretended, with flowery words, to fight for universal health care but when the pretense is put aside, he was a lawyer for ACORN the insurance industry.

During debate on the bill on May 19, 2004, Obama portrayed himself as a conciliatory figure. He acknowledged that he had “worked diligently with the insurance industry,” as well as Republicans, to limit the legislation’s reach and noted that the bill had undergone a “complete restructuring” after industry representatives “legitimately” raised fears that it would result in a single-payer system.

Single payer advocates and public option advocates who persist in their silly Hope and Change beliefs that Obama “secretly” will fight for anything other than himself are fools beyond the reach of history lessons. Obama suckered these fools in order to advance himself and these fools still think he is on their side, “secretly” of course.

“The original presentation of the bill was the House version that we radically changed – we radically changed – and we changed in response to concerns that were raised by the insurance industry,” Obama said, according to the session transcript.

Obama himself states, according to the transcripts, that he will fight for change, including radical change -FOR THE INSURANCE INDUSTRY. History is a teacher.

Obama (remember, history is a teacher) mouthed a lot of flowery words in Illinois too which fooled the gullible then and fools the Hopium addled today:

During debate over the Health Care Justice Act, Obama also attacked the insurers, accusing the industry of “fear-mongering” by claiming, even after he made changes they wanted, that the bill would lead to a government takeover.

Still, Obama’s willingness to hear out insurers and their lobbyists is revealing given the posture he strikes today on the presidential campaign trail – that lobbyists, insurance companies, and other big-industry special interests have an outsized and polluting influence on policy-making in Washington.

Let’s repeated that sentence from 2007 because it is as valid today as it has ever been: “Obama’s willingness to hear out insurers and their lobbyists is revealing given the posture he strikes today”

Lobbyists, Big PhaRma, money men, insurance giants – Obama’s base.

In a new television ad his campaign unveiled last week, Obama says that cynics “don’t believe we can limit the power of lobbyists who block our progress, or that we can trust the American people with the truth. . . . In 20 years of public service, I’ve brought Democrats and Republicans together to solve problems that touch the lives of everyday people. I’ve taken on the drug and insurance companies and won.”

Obama has taken on the the drug and insurance companies in the same way an ACORN hooker takes on tricks.

And yet while serving in Illinois, Obama was willing to accept campaign contributions from lobbyists. Obama’s state Senate campaign committee accepted contributions from insurance companies and their lobbyists – including $1,000 from the Professional Independent Insurance Agents PAC in June 2003, and $1,000 from the Illinois Insurance PAC in December 2003 – while the Health Care Justice Act was wending its way through the Illinois General Assembly. Obama also collected money from the insurance industry and its lobbyists for his successful US Senate campaign in 2004.

Those attacking Senator Max Baucus because of the money he has taken from “special interests” will never discuss Obama taking money from “special interests”. If Max Baucus and those who take “special interest” money are suspect or corrupt why then do PINOs, Dimocrats, and Big Media not view Obama with suspicion and investigative eyes?

For us, History is a Teacher. Big Media, PINOs, and Dimocrats want to ignore history to protect their precious “media darling” Obama.

We will continue to discuss the Obama Health Plan Obama Supporters Do Not Want To Discuss because it says more about the current health care “reform” scam than all the many legislative bills so many are urging be read. No need to read the thousands of pages in the current bills to know what will happen – history is THE guide.

For Americans History is a teacher and a guide too. Every day, as history is made anew, Americans re-learn the history we know so well, as it repeats and repeats:

Obama simply cannot be trusted. Obama cannot be trusted on any issue. Obama cannot be trusted by his friends. Obama cannot be trusted by his enemies. Obama cannot be trusted.


Obama’s Patriot Act And The Castrated Left

This past week the terrorist hunts in Queens, and Denver, were round-the-clock. Today Obama announces his support for extension of the Patriot Act. What a coincidence!

Obama’s Patriot Act makes us feel years younger – almost as if we were back in the George W. Bush years with its politically suspect terror raids. Ah… memories!

Maybe the witch hunts this time will be against pink sites or people who go to tea parties. We’re in for exciting times.

Last week, floating on our pink cloud headquarters, high above American cities, we discussed what we would have done with this Big Pink website if Barack Obama in January had passed a Hillary style Home Ownership Loan Corporation and Health Care Reform (not IRS enforced largess for insurance and pharmaceutical companies). On our pink cloud we agreed that we would have had to cease publication after a long and detailed series of crow eating, humble pie ingesting, articles.

But the celestial choirs did not sing in January, it was a 2010 election slush fund that passed in the early months, and our predictions of future Obama behavior are on target because “history is a teacher”. And we are still in business. We could cease writing new articles and actually simply provide dates and links for earlier articles and republish them – for all the accuracy contained therein.

On our pink cloud, parasols shielding us from the close sun, we also discussed the castrated left and how silent those lambs have been now that Obama has declared in no uncertain terms that illegal immigrants (or undocumented workers to Dimocrats) cannot get health insurance. The lambs have also been silent regarding the ban on abortion funding for women under the non-existent Obama “plan”.

* * * * *

But let’s not get dour and distracted by taking seriously the castrated left – let’s laugh at those eunuchs.

Once again, let’s go into our vaults and read a past article – from July 10, 2008:

Yesterday, an angry Jesse Jackson threatened to slice off Obama’s testicles. Jesse Jackson apparently does not realize that Obama has no “nuts” to cut off.

Obama is a political eunuch who will never stand his ground. Rather, Obama will cower across the aisle and submit to Republican demands.

It’s a day like yesterday that we at Big Pink know beyond dispute that we are right and the incense burners are wrong. Democrats want a Democratic President who will fight for Democratic values.

It is not only Obama who lacks testicular/ovarian fortitude. It is Obama supporters who are getting the leader they deserve. Obama supporters deluded themselves with a creature of their own creation. Now, Obama supporters lack the fortitude to do what needs to be done to rid us of this Chicago flip-flop-flim-flam contortionist.

Those paragraphs read like we wrote them this week, don’t they? Those words are fresh as a daisy. We’ve got Obama’s number and those of his Hopium addled sad sacks.

Speaking of sad sacks, let’s check out the boys on ‘Nothing Left’ for a good laugh:

Meet the New Boss

Obama supports extending Patriot Act provisions

I assume, by this point, no one expected anything else?

If not, forgive me, but you’re the living definition of denial.

Oh, what the hell heck. These “creative class” types are stealing our “Obama is the Third Bush Term” “meme” so let’s be lazy and print their laugh riot in its entirety:

The fundamental truth about the Obama administration is that it is the Bush administration run by slightly less incompetent, marginally less evil people:

* The Iraq occupation will end when Bush wanted it to.

* The Bush administration’s campaign of eradication of fundamental civil liberties, including the gutting of the 4th amendment and holding people without trial, continues.

* The Afghan war continues, and is even being escalated.

* The signature issue of “health care reform” is a scheme which will force citizens to buy private insurance which, because of lack of effective controls, will increase in price faster than wages or inflation.

* Obama and Geithner have followed the Bush/Paulson financial policies, virtually to the letter, spending trillions bailing out Wall Street and creating a financial sector which has fewer, larger actors with more political power than before.

* Obama continues to exert pressure primarily on Progressives rather than on Blue Dogs in order to obtain relatively more conservative rather than liberal bills. (This is not an accident.) The most liberal bill always comes from the House, the conference committee bill is inevitably closer to the more conservative Senate bill. (This is not an accident.)

* Unlike Bush Jr, Bush Sr., Clinton, and Reagan, Obama has not replaced the prior administration’s district attorneys wholesale, instead leaving in place the majority of the Bush administration DA’s who had survived Rove’s purges intended to make sure they were loyal Republican apparatchiks.

* Obama has not cleaned out the administration in general of Bush-era appointees and plants; indeed he has filled less spots than either Clinton or Bush II had by this point in their terms—and no, it’s not because the Senate won’t confirm them.

* Obama appointees will be forced to resign if the right wing (aka Beck) goes after them hard, but if progressives don’t like them, tough luck.

* Obama’s economic team is filled with people who created the framework which allowed the financial meltdown to occur, who didn’t see it coming, and whose solution to it is to give money to their friends and colleagues and try and get another bubble started.

* Etc.

In most meaningful ways, Obama is running a slightly kinder, gentler and very moderately less-stupid version of the Bush constitutional framework.

Plus ça change plus c’est la meme chose.

Poor B.O.T.s – we almost feel sorry for their French quoting, “creative class” self-aggrandizing asses – but we’re too busy laughing at them.

Just imagine what those little “creative class” boobs will do when they have to figure out what to write about after the already delayed immigration reform does not happen; when the Defense of Marriage Act remains untouched (Hillary would have smartly gutted the operative sections of the law but left the law in place to further confound the right-wing. The Obama Hopium addled however did not like Hillary’s sensible, clever solution and instead believed the flim-flam man when he said he would repeal the whole thing. Now they get nothing.); and they finally realize what we told them lo those many years ago was right. Poor B.O.T.s.

We’ll laugh ourselves silly and fray our white gloves applauding, just at the very thought of what the B.O.T.s will say or do, when they discover Barack Obama is raising millions to secure the Dimocratic nomination in the Senate race in Pennsylvania for Arlen Specter – even as the Hopium addled B.O.T.s raise millions for their enemy Blue dogs. That’s Entertainment!

The latest Obama induced distress is the news that Obama will once again agree with George W. Bush:

The Obama administration supports extending three key provisions of the Patriot Act that are due to expire at the end of the year, the Justice Department told Congress in a letter made public Tuesday.

Lawmakers and civil rights groups had been pressing the Democratic administration to say whether it wants to preserve the post-Sept. 11 law’s authority to access business records, as well as monitor so-called “lone wolf” terrorists and conduct roving wiretaps.

The provision on business records was long criticized by rights groups as giving the government access to citizens’ library records, and a coalition of liberal and conservative groups complained that the Patriot Act gives the government too much authority to snoop into Americans’ private lives.

As a presidential candidate, Barack Obama said he would take a close look at the law, based on his past expertise in constitutional law. Back in May, President Obama said legal institutions must be updated to deal with the threat of terrorism, but in a way that preserves the rule of law and accountability.

Obama is still fluffing his “expertise in constitutional law”. How Obama can say that with a straight face is a miracle medical science is yet to explain. Perhaps criminal psychiatry is the study which will explain that mystery.

As to the Obama Patriot Act itself, Dimocratic Senator Leahy will hold a hearing next week and maybe he will invite Obama’s befuddled minions to cry on camera against the perfidious law, for our amusement.

* * * * *

The Patriot Act stab in the back by Obama will not preoccupy his lemmings for too long. Today the Senate Finance Committee is supposed to release some hash writing which passes for the draft plan they will continue to knead until the Committee gives birth to something, anything.

The non-existent plan is already dead and the Duds at MyDud are weeping. The Duds are in such bad shape they concede the Republicans (well, Olympia Snowe) opposing the Baucus bill have a point. The Duds write:To be fair to Senator Snowe, some of her concerns on the Baucus bill are valid and mirror concerns held by liberal Democrats.”

The Hill newspaper has the weep inducing details on the Finance Committee produced mouse:

Senate Democrats are going to have to move forward on healthcare without a single Republican supporter after Sen. Olympia Snowe said Tuesday she could not back the Finance Committee’s bill.

Chairman Max Baucus (D-Mont.) failed to win any Republican backer despite weeks of intense negotiations behind closed doors to strike a deal.

Snowe (Maine), who was one of three Republicans who backed the $787 billion economic stimulus package, was being lobbied heavily by the White House, and some centrists view her refusal to strike a deal with Baucus as troubling. But concerns about how the plan would be paid for prompted her to back away in the hours before its release.

What’s a B.O.T. to do? The Hopium addled will whine and threaten and shout “reconciliation!” but these castrated boys don’t have the testicular fortitude required to admit they have been flim-flammed by Barack Obama. The Hopium addled will stomp feet and say clever things in French. Some of the Hopium addled will feel ever so cool when they post video of the song “Won’t Get Fooled Again”.

Some of the Hopium addled B.O.T.s will denounce the drifty Snowe and ignore her sad complaint:

Obama and Baucus have suggested paying for a big chunk of reform by levying new taxes on high-cost insurance plans. Specifically, Baucus has suggested a 35 percent excise tax on insurance plans that cost single individuals more than $8,000 a year and cost families more than $21,000.

Snowe’s problem with that plan is that it could impose a heavy tax burden on Maine, which has one of the highest average health insurance premiums in the country. A July study by Harvard economist David Cutler found that Maine, on average, has the fourth-most costly insurance premiums in the country, trailing only Connecticut, Delaware and New Hampshire.

Snowe said she is concerned about Baucus’s plans to tax high-cost plans.

Snowe will not be the only Senator troubled by the flaky Obama plans:

For example, family plans in low-cost states such as Kentucky would be taxed above $21,000 but Massachusetts families wouldn’t see plans under $25,000 taxed.

But this threshold would be pegged to the consumer price index, and because healthcare prices are rising faster than inflation, many Maine families could see unexpected taxes after a decade.

Snowe is also having a meltdown over the “affordability” issue.

Snowe has objected to Baucus’s bill for requiring as many as 4 million uninsured Americans to buy health plans without providing them with significant federal subsidies.

Snowe said that lawmakers cannot expect people to comply with a federal mandate to buy health insurance if affordable plans are not available

“The affordability question is crucial,” said Snowe. “It’s a central component, because at the end of the day people have high expectations they will have access to affordable health insurance.”

Why have access to affordable health insurance when you can have “Hope” and “Change”? Who needs health care without the currently planned high premiums and high deductibles – so high you will effectively be transferring wealth to insurance companies for no services whatsoever other than the privilege of handing over money – when you can bask in the countenance of the beaming face and big grin of Barack Obama? These Hopium addled B.O.T.s got what they wanted: Hope, Change, and Obama.

The Castrated Left should be happy now that they have their precious Obama and all the Hope, Change, and Patriot Act (and “racists” everywhere to denounce) they can stomach.

Who needs movies, television or other drollery when we have, for free, the French quoting creative classes to entertain us? That’s Entertainment!


The Lost Symbol

Update: Jimmy Carter is shouting “racist” too along with other silly people in a clearly concerted race-baiting ploy to save the Mess-iah (especially a race-baiting congressman who is visuallizing white sheets and white hoods “riding through the countryside”) as Americans wake up to the non-stop boobery and corruption.

“Racist” Jon Stewart is talking nuts and “The Audacity Of Hos” and Big Media ignoring the ACORNs on the Obama tree:

The Daily Show With Jon Stewart Mon – Thurs 11p / 10c
The Audacity of Hos
Daily Show
Full Episodes
Political Humor Healthcare Protests


Yesterday, a white 17-year old boy was beaten on a bus, in what Al Sharpton (if the races were reversed) would ordinarily call a “racially motivated” (that’s what the police captain said) “hate crime”. This past weekend major newspapers and just about every big PINO writer wrote race-baiting stories in support of Obama’s health care scam.

Kanye West, Serena Williams, Van Jones, Maureen Dowd race-baiting Joe Wilson, Jim Clyburn always race-baiting, reactionary race-baiter Bill Maher and CNN anchor Don Lemon race-baiting , ACORN’s nuts, Joan Walsh race-baiting and blackening, Frank Rich race-baiting, Obama race-baiting “stupidly” – So much for the “post-racial” era.

We’re not surprised by the latest conflicts on school buses which have always occurred. What is new is the racial animosity stirred by national events. We’re also not surprised at the race-baiting by major “liberal” writers, black and white, in recent days. We knew the race-baiting was on its way.

In August of this year we wrote that “Obama wants to play the “racist” card to resuscitate the corpse of his health insurance scam.

Earlier in the year we wrote:

Because of Obama’s race-baiting during the 2008 primaries, African-American politicians know they now can have friends and allies shout “racism” when in trouble and thereby defeat their white opponents. These fake shouts of “racism” in the age of fake demean the long and well documented history of racial bigotry. But like Obama and Burris the “racism” shouters (some like Bill The Bomber Ayres shout “racism” to scare off scrutiny and they are not even African-Americans) know they will not be punished for their bogus, politically motivated, claims of racism.

We have to amend our earlier paragraph to include white politicians engaged in race-baiting. We don’t mean the old caricature of white southern male race-baiters. We mean the 21st century variety. White politicians and writers, like African-American politicians and writers, know that race-baiting is a defense-proof weapon. White politicians and writers are also engaged in race-baiting in order to pass the health insurance scam.

Also, don’t think if you are African-American you are immune to the “racist” charge. Some of the most courageous voices against Obama, some beaten up, are African-Americans who are also tagged as “racists”. The Obama opposition is strong when united and must understand that racism is a charge used to divide.

* * * * *

Racism is just as deadly a drug as Hopium.

No person should imbibe either of those crippling drugs. The race-baiting charges are meant to emotionally inflame white liberals who want to feel morally superior or are genuinely upset by racism and distract from the details of the Obama health insurance scam. The race-baiting is meant to scare away opposition.

The race-baiting of the 21st century is utilized by white liberals and African-American politicians and activists – not the caricature southern racists of yore.

But the 21st century race-baiting has the same aim as the earlier anti-black race-baiting utilized by white politicians in the south (and don’t kid yourself it was just as bad if not worse in the north – Martin Luther King thought racism was worse in the North).

The aim of 21st century race-baiting, like 20th and 19th century race-baiting, is to emotionally inflame and distract.

We warn our readers and friends and allies: Do not be distracted by the enervating drugs of racism or Hopium. Beware of falling into the trap of the race-baiters. Do not let emotion inflame the blood and surrender the intellect to anger and bitterness. Racism and Hopium – Both are deadly and lead down the wrong path.

We warn our readers and friends and allies: Do not allow distrust of ACORN to veer into racism. Yes, many of the faces seen in ACORN scandal videos are black faces, but understand that the board rooms of ACORN are filled with white nuts.

The race-baiting is meant to emotionally inflame, distract from the Obama flim-flam scam, and explain the increasing hostility towards Obama by white voters.

New surveys show steep declines in Obama’s approval ratings among whites — including Democrats and independents — who were crucial elements of the diverse coalition that helped elect the country’s first black president.

Among white Democrats, Obama’s job approval rating has dropped 11 points since his 100-days mark in April, according to surveys by the Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. It has dropped by 9 points among white independents and whites over 50, and by 12 points among white women — all groups that will be targeted by both parties in next year’s midterm elections.

“While Obama has a lock on African Americans, his support among white voters seems to be almost in a free fall,” said veteran Republican pollster Neil Newhouse.

Strategists in both parties blame Obama’s decline on growing discontent with his policy agenda, particularly after a month of often-rowdy debate over his proposed healthcare overhaul, in which some conservatives accused him of socialism. [snip]

Pew first identified a slippage in white support immediately after a news conference in July, when Obama surprised many by saying that a white police officer had acted “stupidly” in arresting a black Harvard professor.

Still unclear is whether Obama’s slide in the polls is due solely to his policies, or questions about his personal background or allegiances.

During the presidential campaign last fall, the nation’s economic meltdown swamped any attempts by Republicans to portray Obama as having radical associations with figures such as his former pastor, the Rev. Jeremiah A. Wright Jr.

The race-baiting is the Obama survival strategy. Policy differences account for Obama’s flaccid polls but the flim-flam Obama supporters shout “racism” to distract and divide.

The race-baiting is meant to emotionally inflame all sides in order to distract from the flim-flam and increasingly obvious fact that Obama cannot be trusted, is too inexperienced and unqualified to be president.

As Wbboei wrote:

I think what many people are saying to barack is dude you are one slick operator. But we know nothing else about you. We do not know where you were born, where you grew up, what your transcripts were, and most of all who put you there because we sure as hell didn’t. We know you were put there to change things, but we do not trust you to protect our interests in the process. In fact, we believe that you are too close to our enemies, allied to big business, and will throw us to the wolves when the opportunity presents itself. We do not like you, we do not trust you and we will no longer listen to you. So you and your big media shills go ahead and tell whatever lies you want. As far as we are concerned this is the twilight zone.

We’re not surprised by the race-baiting:

Barack Obama Thugs (hereinafter, “B.O.T.s) are back out in the streets. The “racist” card is charging up a storm. Anyone who opposes Obama is labeled “racist”. We now see the face of Barack Obama – “a uniter not a divider”. If you are black and opposed to Barack Obama – “racist”. If you are white and opposed to Barack Obama – “racist”. Anyone opposed to Barack Obama or his policies – “racist”.

We’re not surprised by the race-baiting – it’s the Obama way:

Back in Hawaii in the 1970s, it could seem that everyone was some kind of a minority. The fact that Obama was half-black and half-white didn’t matter much to anyone but Obama, Kakugawa says: “He made everything out like it was all racial.” On one occasion, Obama thought he’d gotten a bad break on the school basketball team because he was black. But Kakugawa recalls his father’s telling the teenager, “No, Barry, it’s not because you’re black. It’s because you missed two shots in a row.

Obama race-baited when it was obvious he had no “game”. We’re not surprised by the race-baiting now:

Last night Obama race baited. Obama admitted he did not have the facts but he still called the Cambridge police “stupid”.

Obama indeed did not have the facts. Obama made it seem as if the Cambridge cops were racist burly white men out for a night of cross burning. Obama did not notice there were black cops on the scene.

Remember when Obama was sold by the Hopium addled as a racial healer? Obama is not a racial healer he is a race-baiter for profit.

In 2008 white liberals, the young strung out on Hopium, and most of all – Big Media, forgot Dr. Martin Luther King’s dream that one day his “four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character.

PINOs, the Hopium addled, well-meaning as well as mendacious white liberals, African-Americans – both the good and the rotten, the formerly rational and honorable Democratic Party – all forgot Dr. King’s dream was also an admonition. These fools applauded Obama for his skin color and neglected his bad character.

Dr. King’s dream was a warning to the nation against the flim-flam artists he knew so well because they had tried to flim-flam him and the civil rights movement. Dr. King, wittingly or unwittingly, issued a warning that racial charlatans would eventually try to turn his dream into a skin color extortion scheme.

The race-baiting extortion has begun in order to profit the health insurance companies and pharmaceutical companies who will profit from Obama’s flim-flam schemes.

The Dream is a Nightmare now. The race-baiters, black and white, are in charge now.