<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Celestial Dirge</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hillaryis44.org/2009/01/21/celestial-dirge/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hillaryis44.org/2009/01/21/celestial-dirge/</link>
	<description>We started this website because we believe Senator Hillary Clinton will be an excellent 44th President of the United States.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 06:04:42 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brandon82</title>
		<link>http://www.hillaryis44.org/2009/01/21/celestial-dirge/#comment-233035</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon82</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 05:42:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hillaryis44.org/?p=873#comment-233035</guid>
		<description>I think if he doesnt appoint Bill  Gillibrand sounds like a solid pick!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think if he doesnt appoint Bill  Gillibrand sounds like a solid pick!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.hillaryis44.org/2009/01/21/celestial-dirge/#comment-232861</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 11:21:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hillaryis44.org/?p=873#comment-232861</guid>
		<description>NEW ARTICLE IS UP.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NEW ARTICLE IS UP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: turndownobama-com</title>
		<link>http://www.hillaryis44.org/2009/01/21/celestial-dirge/#comment-232859</link>
		<dc:creator>turndownobama-com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 09:19:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hillaryis44.org/?p=873#comment-232859</guid>
		<description>h...../thenewagenda.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/hillaryclinton358x283.jpg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>h&#8230;../thenewagenda.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/hillaryclinton358&#215;283.jpg</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: turndownobama-com</title>
		<link>http://www.hillaryis44.org/2009/01/21/celestial-dirge/#comment-232858</link>
		<dc:creator>turndownobama-com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 09:13:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hillaryis44.org/?p=873#comment-232858</guid>
		<description>wbboei,

Yes, the anon sources were really caught with their innuendos down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wbboei,</p>
<p>Yes, the anon sources were really caught with their innuendos down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wbboei</title>
		<link>http://www.hillaryis44.org/2009/01/21/celestial-dirge/#comment-232857</link>
		<dc:creator>wbboei</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 08:58:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hillaryis44.org/?p=873#comment-232857</guid>
		<description>Apparently some of the back and forth was in the CK camp rather than all of it being the fault of the media.
--------------------------------------
Turndown: true. but in that case they did not know who to talk to or who was calling the shots.  This is what happens when they trade in gossip and inuendo.  Their reporting is untrustworthy.  The one they should be talking to is Caroline or her official spokesman instead of undisclosed sources. AP is a gossip mill and a spin machine.  This time the joke was on them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently some of the back and forth was in the CK camp rather than all of it being the fault of the media.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
Turndown: true. but in that case they did not know who to talk to or who was calling the shots.  This is what happens when they trade in gossip and inuendo.  Their reporting is untrustworthy.  The one they should be talking to is Caroline or her official spokesman instead of undisclosed sources. AP is a gossip mill and a spin machine.  This time the joke was on them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: turndownobama-com</title>
		<link>http://www.hillaryis44.org/2009/01/21/celestial-dirge/#comment-232856</link>
		<dc:creator>turndownobama-com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 07:16:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hillaryis44.org/?p=873#comment-232856</guid>
		<description>wbboei Says: 
January 22nd, 2009 at 1:38 am
Maloney or Gillibrand would be great. They have legislative experience, proven ability to win an election, and are strong advocates for women.
———————————————————-
Agreed. I believe they were both Hillary supporters. Or am I wrong.
===============

I think so, especially Maloney. And Bill campaigned for Gillibrand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wbboei Says:<br />
January 22nd, 2009 at 1:38 am<br />
Maloney or Gillibrand would be great. They have legislative experience, proven ability to win an election, and are strong advocates for women.<br />
———————————————————-<br />
Agreed. I believe they were both Hillary supporters. Or am I wrong.<br />
===============</p>
<p>I think so, especially Maloney. And Bill campaigned for Gillibrand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: turndownobama-com</title>
		<link>http://www.hillaryis44.org/2009/01/21/celestial-dirge/#comment-232855</link>
		<dc:creator>turndownobama-com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 07:14:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hillaryis44.org/?p=873#comment-232855</guid>
		<description>wbboei said: I have no doubt Obama tried to talk her into continuing and then promising Patterson something since he had undoubtledly made a promise to Ted to get her in. It appears it was too little to late, and if Obama had acted sooner it might have made a difference.
===================

Apparently some of the back and forth was in the CK camp rather than all of it being the fault of the media.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wbboei said: I have no doubt Obama tried to talk her into continuing and then promising Patterson something since he had undoubtledly made a promise to Ted to get her in. It appears it was too little to late, and if Obama had acted sooner it might have made a difference.<br />
===================</p>
<p>Apparently some of the back and forth was in the CK camp rather than all of it being the fault of the media.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: henry</title>
		<link>http://www.hillaryis44.org/2009/01/21/celestial-dirge/#comment-232854</link>
		<dc:creator>henry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 07:14:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hillaryis44.org/?p=873#comment-232854</guid>
		<description>I have to take pause and think the ck withdrawal was timed. Popped into a few non waffle eating non kool-aid drinking sites and everyone is going on about ck. very little bout bambi. timing is everything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to take pause and think the ck withdrawal was timed. Popped into a few non waffle eating non kool-aid drinking sites and everyone is going on about ck. very little bout bambi. timing is everything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: turndownobama-com</title>
		<link>http://www.hillaryis44.org/2009/01/21/celestial-dirge/#comment-232853</link>
		<dc:creator>turndownobama-com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 07:04:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hillaryis44.org/?p=873#comment-232853</guid>
		<description>birdgal Says: 
January 22nd, 2009 at 1:20 am
Maloney or Gillibrand would be great. They have legislative experience, proven ability to win an election, and are strong advocates for women.
=====================

So I&#039;ve heard. Both are currently in Congress. If one of them is chosen, what happens to her Congressional seat? If another woman gets that (such as Weingarten) who is not currently in Washington, then that&#039;s a net gain for women. (Not that I&#039;m really into quotas.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>birdgal Says:<br />
January 22nd, 2009 at 1:20 am<br />
Maloney or Gillibrand would be great. They have legislative experience, proven ability to win an election, and are strong advocates for women.<br />
=====================</p>
<p>So I&#8217;ve heard. Both are currently in Congress. If one of them is chosen, what happens to her Congressional seat? If another woman gets that (such as Weingarten) who is not currently in Washington, then that&#8217;s a net gain for women. (Not that I&#8217;m really into quotas.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: turndownobama-com</title>
		<link>http://www.hillaryis44.org/2009/01/21/celestial-dirge/#comment-232852</link>
		<dc:creator>turndownobama-com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 06:58:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hillaryis44.org/?p=873#comment-232852</guid>
		<description>birdgal Says: 
January 22nd, 2009 at 12:54 am
turndown: I’m glad that he didn’t make a snap decision about this, but this is turning into a 3 three ring circus.
================

One less ring now, anyway (the NYT hopes).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>birdgal Says:<br />
January 22nd, 2009 at 12:54 am<br />
turndown: I’m glad that he didn’t make a snap decision about this, but this is turning into a 3 three ring circus.<br />
================</p>
<p>One less ring now, anyway (the NYT hopes).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
