<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: California Super Debate With Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hillaryis44.org/2008/01/31/california-super-debate-with-hillary-clinton-and-barack-obama/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hillaryis44.org/2008/01/31/california-super-debate-with-hillary-clinton-and-barack-obama/</link>
	<description>We started this website because we believe Senator Hillary Clinton will be an excellent 44th President of the United States.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 05:52:00 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: basil9</title>
		<link>http://www.hillaryis44.org/2008/01/31/california-super-debate-with-hillary-clinton-and-barack-obama/#comment-55182</link>
		<dc:creator>basil9</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 22:33:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hillaryis44.org/?p=467#comment-55182</guid>
		<description>5:00 news hour CNN leads with a 10 minute info-mercial (my phrase) of Obama speaking in NM . . . then turns to HRC and launches right into the iraq question,
calling it a win for BO.

Then he announces LATimes, Moveon.org and Charlie Rengel&#039;s wife&#039;s endorsements.

I think I&#039;m gonna puke.  I swear there are times I don&#039;t think HRC has a chance in he11.  They&#039;ve stacked the decks too high.
Feedback, anyone?  Some positive reinforcement?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>5:00 news hour CNN leads with a 10 minute info-mercial (my phrase) of Obama speaking in NM . . . then turns to HRC and launches right into the iraq question,<br />
calling it a win for BO.</p>
<p>Then he announces LATimes, Moveon.org and Charlie Rengel&#8217;s wife&#8217;s endorsements.</p>
<p>I think I&#8217;m gonna puke.  I swear there are times I don&#8217;t think HRC has a chance in he11.  They&#8217;ve stacked the decks too high.<br />
Feedback, anyone?  Some positive reinforcement?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GiveEmHill</title>
		<link>http://www.hillaryis44.org/2008/01/31/california-super-debate-with-hillary-clinton-and-barack-obama/#comment-55141</link>
		<dc:creator>GiveEmHill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 21:36:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hillaryis44.org/?p=467#comment-55141</guid>
		<description>CNN Dem Debate Most Watched in Cable History

Breaking: Last night&#039;s Democratic debate on CNN drew 8,324,000 million total viewers, making it the most-watched primary debate in cable news history, and the second-most watched on TV this election cycle (ABC&#039;s Democratic debate on Jan. 5 drew 9,360,000)

The debate gives CNN the top five highest rated cable debates this cycle in total viewers.

&gt; Update: In the A25-54 demo, the debate finished with 3,257,000 viewers, the #1 take in cable news history as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CNN Dem Debate Most Watched in Cable History</p>
<p>Breaking: Last night&#8217;s Democratic debate on CNN drew 8,324,000 million total viewers, making it the most-watched primary debate in cable news history, and the second-most watched on TV this election cycle (ABC&#8217;s Democratic debate on Jan. 5 drew 9,360,000)</p>
<p>The debate gives CNN the top five highest rated cable debates this cycle in total viewers.</p>
<p>&gt; Update: In the A25-54 demo, the debate finished with 3,257,000 viewers, the #1 take in cable news history as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1950democrat</title>
		<link>http://www.hillaryis44.org/2008/01/31/california-super-debate-with-hillary-clinton-and-barack-obama/#comment-55103</link>
		<dc:creator>1950democrat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 21:01:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hillaryis44.org/?p=467#comment-55103</guid>
		<description>Emjay - Was it you who said you had read Hillary&#039;s actual statements when voting for the AUMF? Where can I find those?

Here is a quote from a very good summary by a conservative writer.

http://www.hillaryclinton.com/news/article/view/?id=1336 
No Apology Needed
New York Times
David Brooks
&lt;i&gt;She sought a third way: more U.N. resolutions, more inspections, more diplomacy, with the threat of force reserved as a last resort. She was triangulating, but the Senate resolution offered her a binary choice. She voted yes in order to give Powell bipartisan leverage at the U.N.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Emjay &#8211; Was it you who said you had read Hillary&#8217;s actual statements when voting for the AUMF? Where can I find those?</p>
<p>Here is a quote from a very good summary by a conservative writer.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.hillaryclinton.com/news/article/view/?id=1336" rel="nofollow">http://www.hillaryclinton.com/news/article/view/?id=1336</a><br />
No Apology Needed<br />
New York Times<br />
David Brooks<br />
<i>She sought a third way: more U.N. resolutions, more inspections, more diplomacy, with the threat of force reserved as a last resort. She was triangulating, but the Senate resolution offered her a binary choice. She voted yes in order to give Powell bipartisan leverage at the U.N.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: basil9</title>
		<link>http://www.hillaryis44.org/2008/01/31/california-super-debate-with-hillary-clinton-and-barack-obama/#comment-54881</link>
		<dc:creator>basil9</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 18:10:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hillaryis44.org/?p=467#comment-54881</guid>
		<description>She was fantastic!  And I think voters will ignore MSM like they did in Florida and NH.

BTW - I am so HAPPY to have found this site!  I&#039;ve been screaming at the tube for weeks coz of the skewed coverage; writing letters to editors, emailing news executives, fighting to get Mathews to tone it down.  I agree that her performance tonight was impeccable.  She has such dignity, such honesty, such grace.  MSM will continue to battle her for the WH but regardless of what happens, she is the real winner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She was fantastic!  And I think voters will ignore MSM like they did in Florida and NH.</p>
<p>BTW &#8211; I am so HAPPY to have found this site!  I&#8217;ve been screaming at the tube for weeks coz of the skewed coverage; writing letters to editors, emailing news executives, fighting to get Mathews to tone it down.  I agree that her performance tonight was impeccable.  She has such dignity, such honesty, such grace.  MSM will continue to battle her for the WH but regardless of what happens, she is the real winner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wbboei</title>
		<link>http://www.hillaryis44.org/2008/01/31/california-super-debate-with-hillary-clinton-and-barack-obama/#comment-54589</link>
		<dc:creator>wbboei</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 06:12:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hillaryis44.org/?p=467#comment-54589</guid>
		<description>Okie-  I hear ya.  But it is only the latest explanation for why Ted did what he did. More the deponent sayeth not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okie-  I hear ya.  But it is only the latest explanation for why Ted did what he did. More the deponent sayeth not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HighlyEducatedHillarySupporter</title>
		<link>http://www.hillaryis44.org/2008/01/31/california-super-debate-with-hillary-clinton-and-barack-obama/#comment-54575</link>
		<dc:creator>HighlyEducatedHillarySupporter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 06:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hillaryis44.org/?p=467#comment-54575</guid>
		<description>S: These pundits always think of some excuse for her success. After New Hampshire it was the &quot;Bradley effect&quot; and voter machine failure, after Nevada it was because Latinos naturally hate blacks so they went to Hillary, in Florida the 800,000+ people who voted for her were &quot;irrelevant&quot;. They&#039;ll probably say that it was &quot;luck&quot; or that she did something illegal to win. They will never give her the 100% respect and credit she deserves for winning despite all of the media bias and attacks. 
~~~~~~~~~~
S Says:
February 1st, 2008 at 12:12 am

I am just thinking…when Hillary gets the nomination…what the hell are all these ‘progressive’ pundits going to do and say…are they suddenly going to see the light and Hillary’s brilliance and control and command and start singing her praises or are they going to remain blinded by their emotion and criticize her against a republican!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>S: These pundits always think of some excuse for her success. After New Hampshire it was the &#8220;Bradley effect&#8221; and voter machine failure, after Nevada it was because Latinos naturally hate blacks so they went to Hillary, in Florida the 800,000+ people who voted for her were &#8220;irrelevant&#8221;. They&#8217;ll probably say that it was &#8220;luck&#8221; or that she did something illegal to win. They will never give her the 100% respect and credit she deserves for winning despite all of the media bias and attacks.<br />
~~~~~~~~~~<br />
S Says:<br />
February 1st, 2008 at 12:12 am</p>
<p>I am just thinking…when Hillary gets the nomination…what the hell are all these ‘progressive’ pundits going to do and say…are they suddenly going to see the light and Hillary’s brilliance and control and command and start singing her praises or are they going to remain blinded by their emotion and criticize her against a republican!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wbboei</title>
		<link>http://www.hillaryis44.org/2008/01/31/california-super-debate-with-hillary-clinton-and-barack-obama/#comment-54564</link>
		<dc:creator>wbboei</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 05:49:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hillaryis44.org/?p=467#comment-54564</guid>
		<description>Excerpts from rather lengthy posting I am doing for another website, that reiterates what we have been saying about MSNBC, and was clearly in evidence tonight like every night.  (Note: there are some excellent jounalists to whom this critique this would not apply.)

Big Media has abandoned the traditional role of an honest broker and become a bitter partisan advocate.  Consequently, they distort the truth, exploit race and gender fault lines, attack the qualified candidate, and worship the Golden Calf  

. . . . . . . .  

Simply put, Big Media has made a cynical business decision to distort the truth for the sake of ratings and to arrogate unto itself the role of kingmaker in the political process.  But the more they try to mislead us, the more the American People begin to see them for the carnival barkers they have become and reject whatever they say based on the time honored principle of falso en uno, falso en omnibus.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excerpts from rather lengthy posting I am doing for another website, that reiterates what we have been saying about MSNBC, and was clearly in evidence tonight like every night.  (Note: there are some excellent jounalists to whom this critique this would not apply.)</p>
<p>Big Media has abandoned the traditional role of an honest broker and become a bitter partisan advocate.  Consequently, they distort the truth, exploit race and gender fault lines, attack the qualified candidate, and worship the Golden Calf  </p>
<p>. . . . . . . .  </p>
<p>Simply put, Big Media has made a cynical business decision to distort the truth for the sake of ratings and to arrogate unto itself the role of kingmaker in the political process.  But the more they try to mislead us, the more the American People begin to see them for the carnival barkers they have become and reject whatever they say based on the time honored principle of falso en uno, falso en omnibus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NYCMax</title>
		<link>http://www.hillaryis44.org/2008/01/31/california-super-debate-with-hillary-clinton-and-barack-obama/#comment-54554</link>
		<dc:creator>NYCMax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 05:38:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hillaryis44.org/?p=467#comment-54554</guid>
		<description>kaffleen: I disagree, I think that alot happened in this debate that went unnoticed.  There were so many undercurrents with Hillary speaking to so many different people on so many different levels. It was a tour de force performance. I&#039;ll go out on a limb and predict that this debate will go in the History books and be studied as a masterclass of debating skills.

We&#039;ll see on Tuesday just how effective she was, but, man, win or lose, this woman is brilliant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>kaffleen: I disagree, I think that alot happened in this debate that went unnoticed.  There were so many undercurrents with Hillary speaking to so many different people on so many different levels. It was a tour de force performance. I&#8217;ll go out on a limb and predict that this debate will go in the History books and be studied as a masterclass of debating skills.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ll see on Tuesday just how effective she was, but, man, win or lose, this woman is brilliant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wbboei</title>
		<link>http://www.hillaryis44.org/2008/01/31/california-super-debate-with-hillary-clinton-and-barack-obama/#comment-54545</link>
		<dc:creator>wbboei</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 05:26:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hillaryis44.org/?p=467#comment-54545</guid>
		<description>A friend of mine now deceased used to say that in old age the mind is the second thing to go. All I can tell you is I dont take it all in as fast as I used to but thank God I can still file a supplemental brief. . . . .

What I would say to you now that I did not say before is that the presentation tonight was just what it needed to be. Hillary was radiant.  She was cordial to Barack notwithstanding the snub. And, of course, her command of the issues was clearly superior to his.  

She scored so many points for those who were listening.  Remember the time that Barack implied she failed to do something and she told him she sponsored a bill on that in 2004, or the time she revealed that Barack had agreed to support her legislation on a permanent commitment on Iraq, or the way she pointed out that he too had had difficulty with the drivers license for illegals question, or the appreciation she had for labor market dyamics. So many other things.

This was one more marvelous performance in what was billed by the carnival barkers as an event bigger than the Oscars.  In a debate she never disappoints, and the same will be true when she becomes our 44th President.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A friend of mine now deceased used to say that in old age the mind is the second thing to go. All I can tell you is I dont take it all in as fast as I used to but thank God I can still file a supplemental brief. . . . .</p>
<p>What I would say to you now that I did not say before is that the presentation tonight was just what it needed to be. Hillary was radiant.  She was cordial to Barack notwithstanding the snub. And, of course, her command of the issues was clearly superior to his.  </p>
<p>She scored so many points for those who were listening.  Remember the time that Barack implied she failed to do something and she told him she sponsored a bill on that in 2004, or the time she revealed that Barack had agreed to support her legislation on a permanent commitment on Iraq, or the way she pointed out that he too had had difficulty with the drivers license for illegals question, or the appreciation she had for labor market dyamics. So many other things.</p>
<p>This was one more marvelous performance in what was billed by the carnival barkers as an event bigger than the Oscars.  In a debate she never disappoints, and the same will be true when she becomes our 44th President.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emjay</title>
		<link>http://www.hillaryis44.org/2008/01/31/california-super-debate-with-hillary-clinton-and-barack-obama/#comment-54539</link>
		<dc:creator>Emjay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 05:20:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hillaryis44.org/?p=467#comment-54539</guid>
		<description>Hey Chaz356

We also need that bumper sticker that says 

&quot;Pi$$ off the Media * Elect Hillary * By a Large Margin&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Chaz356</p>
<p>We also need that bumper sticker that says </p>
<p>&#8220;Pi$$ off the Media * Elect Hillary * By a Large Margin&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
