<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Our Lonely Days Are Over</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hillaryis44.org/2008/01/23/our-lonely-days-are-over/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hillaryis44.org/2008/01/23/our-lonely-days-are-over/</link>
	<description>We started this website because we believe Senator Hillary Clinton will be an excellent 44th President of the United States.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 22:32:41 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Idunn</title>
		<link>http://www.hillaryis44.org/2008/01/23/our-lonely-days-are-over/#comment-47338</link>
		<dc:creator>Idunn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 06:35:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hillaryis44.org/?p=453#comment-47338</guid>
		<description>Oddly enough, right after I found that particular piece on Andy Martin , I decided to peruse the official Obama site, and what do I see? Them addressing this character. Is the guy a crackpot? Probably. But he must be getting some kind of attention for the Obama camp to have addressed him.

Odd.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oddly enough, right after I found that particular piece on Andy Martin , I decided to peruse the official Obama site, and what do I see? Them addressing this character. Is the guy a crackpot? Probably. But he must be getting some kind of attention for the Obama camp to have addressed him.</p>
<p>Odd.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wbboei</title>
		<link>http://www.hillaryis44.org/2008/01/23/our-lonely-days-are-over/#comment-44478</link>
		<dc:creator>wbboei</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 08:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hillaryis44.org/?p=453#comment-44478</guid>
		<description>Admin.- thanks for the clarification.  When I first came upon this site, the Rezko issue was under discussion.  Big Media was as you say mum.  I was unaware of your initial skepticism about the story, but that is all to your credit. And so is the fact that you formed your conclusions only after a due diligence investigation.  I can appreciate your concern that the Rezko issue be vetted and that Obama have an opportunity to respond to it in the primary process for the good of the party and no less the country.  My admiration for your work only increases.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Admin.- thanks for the clarification.  When I first came upon this site, the Rezko issue was under discussion.  Big Media was as you say mum.  I was unaware of your initial skepticism about the story, but that is all to your credit. And so is the fact that you formed your conclusions only after a due diligence investigation.  I can appreciate your concern that the Rezko issue be vetted and that Obama have an opportunity to respond to it in the primary process for the good of the party and no less the country.  My admiration for your work only increases.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.hillaryis44.org/2008/01/23/our-lonely-days-are-over/#comment-44458</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 06:53:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hillaryis44.org/?p=453#comment-44458</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re making us blush bright pink wbboei.  

On Rezko, we originally gave Obama a big benefit of the doubt.  We did not think much of the story at first in late 2006 and even very early 2007.  Then, more information emerged and we checked and called to Chicago and understood what was going on.  

The surprise was always Big Media reluctance to even slightly explore this story and provide Obama the opportunity to explain either his stupidity or cupidity.  

As you write, the danger we saw was Obama getting nominated then the scandal blowing up in time to save the Republicans.  Hillary was always the best candidate but the real opponent was never Obama it was Big Media.  Obama is just their tool to get Hillary for their own twisted reasons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re making us blush bright pink wbboei.  </p>
<p>On Rezko, we originally gave Obama a big benefit of the doubt.  We did not think much of the story at first in late 2006 and even very early 2007.  Then, more information emerged and we checked and called to Chicago and understood what was going on.  </p>
<p>The surprise was always Big Media reluctance to even slightly explore this story and provide Obama the opportunity to explain either his stupidity or cupidity.  </p>
<p>As you write, the danger we saw was Obama getting nominated then the scandal blowing up in time to save the Republicans.  Hillary was always the best candidate but the real opponent was never Obama it was Big Media.  Obama is just their tool to get Hillary for their own twisted reasons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wbboei</title>
		<link>http://www.hillaryis44.org/2008/01/23/our-lonely-days-are-over/#comment-44455</link>
		<dc:creator>wbboei</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 06:36:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hillaryis44.org/?p=453#comment-44455</guid>
		<description>Admin.- if they gave Pulitzers to bloggers, there is no doubt in my mind that you would get one.  You were the first to uncover the Rezko miasma percolating below the surface of the of the Obama campaign. . . . .  

It was vitally important for the American People to know the truth about this before they voted.  But bitter partisans like Russert did everything they could to hide it from their view.  See Canaan analysis (infra.). . .  

Yet you persisted and the homework was done.  It only remained for the Obama to utter the WalMart remark, our girl to respond and suddenly the genie was out of the bottle.

If you look past South Carolina to February 5, the Obama campaign will begin to realize the truth of the following statement:  

Apres Rezko, le deluge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Admin.- if they gave Pulitzers to bloggers, there is no doubt in my mind that you would get one.  You were the first to uncover the Rezko miasma percolating below the surface of the of the Obama campaign. . . . .  </p>
<p>It was vitally important for the American People to know the truth about this before they voted.  But bitter partisans like Russert did everything they could to hide it from their view.  See Canaan analysis (infra.). . .  </p>
<p>Yet you persisted and the homework was done.  It only remained for the Obama to utter the WalMart remark, our girl to respond and suddenly the genie was out of the bottle.</p>
<p>If you look past South Carolina to February 5, the Obama campaign will begin to realize the truth of the following statement:  </p>
<p>Apres Rezko, le deluge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wasabigirl</title>
		<link>http://www.hillaryis44.org/2008/01/23/our-lonely-days-are-over/#comment-44454</link>
		<dc:creator>wasabigirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 06:36:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hillaryis44.org/?p=453#comment-44454</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure I understand.  Michelle Obama&#039;s involvement in Treehouse is a conflict of interest, but why didn&#039;t she resign before the start of the campaign.  It seems that as a matter of principle she would have done that once her husband began to speak out about it, which appears to be fore the campaign began.

I know several people who work at Wally World.  It&#039;s really not a worker friendly environment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure I understand.  Michelle Obama&#8217;s involvement in Treehouse is a conflict of interest, but why didn&#8217;t she resign before the start of the campaign.  It seems that as a matter of principle she would have done that once her husband began to speak out about it, which appears to be fore the campaign began.</p>
<p>I know several people who work at Wally World.  It&#8217;s really not a worker friendly environment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.hillaryis44.org/2008/01/23/our-lonely-days-are-over/#comment-44453</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 06:35:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hillaryis44.org/?p=453#comment-44453</guid>
		<description>Just posted a new article which is a sort of &quot;greatest hits&quot; from the comments, piece.  Hope audaciously that you enjoy it as it was mostly written by you.  We just compiled it in thematic order.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just posted a new article which is a sort of &#8220;greatest hits&#8221; from the comments, piece.  Hope audaciously that you enjoy it as it was mostly written by you.  We just compiled it in thematic order.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HillaryLandRocks</title>
		<link>http://www.hillaryis44.org/2008/01/23/our-lonely-days-are-over/#comment-44452</link>
		<dc:creator>HillaryLandRocks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 06:33:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hillaryis44.org/?p=453#comment-44452</guid>
		<description>NYCMax: &lt;i&gt;SC was set up specifically to give AAs a voice in the early selection process.&lt;/i&gt;

A few more points. Some  have questioned Obama&#039;s continued rallying of AA voters around &#039;racism&#039; allegations and interpreted it as a potential sign of weakness/lack of confidence. No, he&#039;s fine-tuning at this point. CD-6 (Clyburn) will probably have somewhere greater than 70% AA participation -- we are at risk of getting blown out 6-0 delegate-wise. Another CD to watch is CD-5. The two districts contribute 12/29 total district-level delegates.  Everything you see at this point is jockeying for delegates at the district-level. Don&#039;t let the media fool you with the &quot;here&#039;s what Clinton needs to do to win SC&quot; nonsense -- the game plan is to optimize delegates district/state-wide.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NYCMax: <i>SC was set up specifically to give AAs a voice in the early selection process.</i></p>
<p>A few more points. Some  have questioned Obama&#8217;s continued rallying of AA voters around &#8216;racism&#8217; allegations and interpreted it as a potential sign of weakness/lack of confidence. No, he&#8217;s fine-tuning at this point. CD-6 (Clyburn) will probably have somewhere greater than 70% AA participation &#8212; we are at risk of getting blown out 6-0 delegate-wise. Another CD to watch is CD-5. The two districts contribute 12/29 total district-level delegates.  Everything you see at this point is jockeying for delegates at the district-level. Don&#8217;t let the media fool you with the &#8220;here&#8217;s what Clinton needs to do to win SC&#8221; nonsense &#8212; the game plan is to optimize delegates district/state-wide.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gladiatorstail</title>
		<link>http://www.hillaryis44.org/2008/01/23/our-lonely-days-are-over/#comment-44451</link>
		<dc:creator>gladiatorstail</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 06:29:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hillaryis44.org/?p=453#comment-44451</guid>
		<description>http://www.surveyusa.com/client/PollReportEmail.aspx?g=ad723bad-3bee-40ac-9b99-ab9b2043c2b3


McCain 50
Obama 45

and this guy thinks he is electable and calls Hillary unelectable.. idiot!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.surveyusa.com/client/PollReportEmail.aspx?g=ad723bad-3bee-40ac-9b99-ab9b2043c2b3" rel="nofollow">http://www.surveyusa.com/client/PollReportEmail.aspx?g=ad723bad-3bee-40ac-9b99-ab9b2043c2b3</a></p>
<p>McCain 50<br />
Obama 45</p>
<p>and this guy thinks he is electable and calls Hillary unelectable.. idiot!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pulchritude</title>
		<link>http://www.hillaryis44.org/2008/01/23/our-lonely-days-are-over/#comment-44450</link>
		<dc:creator>pulchritude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 06:23:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hillaryis44.org/?p=453#comment-44450</guid>
		<description>Let us have a discussion on WAL-MART.

http://www.blogs.abcnews.com/politicalradar/2007/05/michelle_obama_.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let us have a discussion on WAL-MART.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.blogs.abcnews.com/politicalradar/2007/05/michelle_obama_.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.blogs.abcnews.com/politicalradar/2007/05/michelle_obama_.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rjk1957</title>
		<link>http://www.hillaryis44.org/2008/01/23/our-lonely-days-are-over/#comment-44449</link>
		<dc:creator>rjk1957</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 06:10:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hillaryis44.org/?p=453#comment-44449</guid>
		<description>Sheila Jackson Lee should be on Hillary&#039;s truth squad</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sheila Jackson Lee should be on Hillary&#8217;s truth squad</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
