<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: REZKO For Dummies, Part II</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hillaryis44.org/2008/01/13/rezko-for-dummies-part-ii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hillaryis44.org/2008/01/13/rezko-for-dummies-part-ii/</link>
	<description>We started this website because we believe Senator Hillary Clinton will be an excellent 44th President of the United States.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 20:23:07 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Hillary Is 44 &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Our Lonely Days Are Over</title>
		<link>http://www.hillaryis44.org/2008/01/13/rezko-for-dummies-part-ii/#comment-44016</link>
		<dc:creator>Hillary Is 44 &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Our Lonely Days Are Over</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 19:51:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hillaryis44.org/?p=438#comment-44016</guid>
		<description>[...] REZKO For Dummies series, (Part I, Part II and Part III) with wonderful videos were popular. Some of the voices added to the REZKO choir [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] REZKO For Dummies series, (Part I, Part II and Part III) with wonderful videos were popular. Some of the voices added to the REZKO choir [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hillary Is 44 &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Hillary Clinton, John Edwards, Barack Obama - Tumbling Dice</title>
		<link>http://www.hillaryis44.org/2008/01/13/rezko-for-dummies-part-ii/#comment-40390</link>
		<dc:creator>Hillary Is 44 &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Hillary Clinton, John Edwards, Barack Obama - Tumbling Dice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 19:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hillaryis44.org/?p=438#comment-40390</guid>
		<description>[...] more information read Rezko for Dummies and Rezko for Dummies, Part II and our April 30, 2007 seminal article Will Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald Destroy the Obama [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] more information read Rezko for Dummies and Rezko for Dummies, Part II and our April 30, 2007 seminal article Will Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald Destroy the Obama [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1950democrat</title>
		<link>http://www.hillaryis44.org/2008/01/13/rezko-for-dummies-part-ii/#comment-37052</link>
		<dc:creator>1950democrat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 20:54:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hillaryis44.org/?p=438#comment-37052</guid>
		<description>Re Obama removing his speech from his website, see also
http://www.blackcommentator.com/47/47_cover.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re Obama removing his speech from his website, see also<br />
<a href="http://www.blackcommentator.com/47/47_cover.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.blackcommentator.com/47/47_cover.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1950democrat</title>
		<link>http://www.hillaryis44.org/2008/01/13/rezko-for-dummies-part-ii/#comment-37036</link>
		<dc:creator>1950democrat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 20:35:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hillaryis44.org/?p=438#comment-37036</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s something we need to get out to Michigan. Hillary needs the votes there, even though hers is the only viable name. If the ballot isn&#039;t returned or her name isn&#039;t checked, she doesn&#039;t get the delegate.

As for voting for Romney in Michigan -- that would game Hillary. I suspect this mischief Romney thing was started to take those votes away from Hillary, and to make the Dems look bad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s something we need to get out to Michigan. Hillary needs the votes there, even though hers is the only viable name. If the ballot isn&#8217;t returned or her name isn&#8217;t checked, she doesn&#8217;t get the delegate.</p>
<p>As for voting for Romney in Michigan &#8212; that would game Hillary. I suspect this mischief Romney thing was started to take those votes away from Hillary, and to make the Dems look bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1950democrat</title>
		<link>http://www.hillaryis44.org/2008/01/13/rezko-for-dummies-part-ii/#comment-37022</link>
		<dc:creator>1950democrat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 20:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hillaryis44.org/?p=438#comment-37022</guid>
		<description>http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/1207/The_Obama_questionnaire.html

These Independent Voters of Illinois/Independent Precinct Organization (IVI-IPO) guys might have some leads. Some of them are no longer supporting Obama.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/1207/The_Obama_questionnaire.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/1207/The_Obama_questionnaire.html</a></p>
<p>These Independent Voters of Illinois/Independent Precinct Organization (IVI-IPO) guys might have some leads. Some of them are no longer supporting Obama.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1950democrat</title>
		<link>http://www.hillaryis44.org/2008/01/13/rezko-for-dummies-part-ii/#comment-37017</link>
		<dc:creator>1950democrat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 20:04:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hillaryis44.org/?p=438#comment-37017</guid>
		<description>No sooner had Obama&#039;s U.S. Senate campaign been declared &quot;viable&quot; by the corporate media, than the speech disappeared from Obama&#039;s web site. ...
www.blackagendareport.com/index.php?option=com_ content&amp;task=view&amp;id=407&amp;Itemid=44 - 62k - Cached - Similar pages

&quot;Specifically, State Senator Obama maintains that an October 2002 anti-war speech was removed from his campaign web site because ‘the speech was dated once ...
www.blackagendareport.com/index.php?option=com_ content&amp;task=view&amp;id=491&amp;Itemid=1 - 91k - Cached - Similar pages


Entering the following in Google&#039;s search box brings many good cites from blackagenda.com. Replace &#039;website speech&#039; with whatever you&#039;re interested in.

site:blackagendareport.com obama website speech

&lt;i&gt;When his speech at the antiwar rally in 2002 was quietly removed from his campaign Web site, activists found that to be an ominous sign.&lt;/i&gt; -- New Yorker</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No sooner had Obama&#8217;s U.S. Senate campaign been declared &#8220;viable&#8221; by the corporate media, than the speech disappeared from Obama&#8217;s web site. &#8230;<br />
<a href="http://www.blackagendareport.com/index.php?option=com_" rel="nofollow">http://www.blackagendareport.com/index.php?option=com_</a> content&amp;task=view&amp;id=407&amp;Itemid=44 &#8211; 62k &#8211; Cached &#8211; Similar pages</p>
<p>&#8220;Specifically, State Senator Obama maintains that an October 2002 anti-war speech was removed from his campaign web site because ‘the speech was dated once &#8230;<br />
<a href="http://www.blackagendareport.com/index.php?option=com_" rel="nofollow">http://www.blackagendareport.com/index.php?option=com_</a> content&amp;task=view&amp;id=491&amp;Itemid=1 &#8211; 91k &#8211; Cached &#8211; Similar pages</p>
<p>Entering the following in Google&#8217;s search box brings many good cites from blackagenda.com. Replace &#8216;website speech&#8217; with whatever you&#8217;re interested in.</p>
<p>site:blackagendareport.com obama website speech</p>
<p><i>When his speech at the antiwar rally in 2002 was quietly removed from his campaign Web site, activists found that to be an ominous sign.</i> &#8212; New Yorker</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: limabeans</title>
		<link>http://www.hillaryis44.org/2008/01/13/rezko-for-dummies-part-ii/#comment-37001</link>
		<dc:creator>limabeans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 19:47:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hillaryis44.org/?p=438#comment-37001</guid>
		<description>Juan Williams is a tool.  One of my aa friends recently got so angry about an op-ed by Williams that he ranted over email about wanting to beat Williams&#039; ass.  HA!   It was all about lower-class v. upper-class blacks and how the latter group seemed to be morally superior to the former, in Williams&#039; opinion.  Really irritating crap!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Juan Williams is a tool.  One of my aa friends recently got so angry about an op-ed by Williams that he ranted over email about wanting to beat Williams&#8217; ass.  HA!   It was all about lower-class v. upper-class blacks and how the latter group seemed to be morally superior to the former, in Williams&#8217; opinion.  Really irritating crap!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1950democrat</title>
		<link>http://www.hillaryis44.org/2008/01/13/rezko-for-dummies-part-ii/#comment-36999</link>
		<dc:creator>1950democrat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 19:46:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hillaryis44.org/?p=438#comment-36999</guid>
		<description>Obama finding HIS voice! -- in Chicago 2000 election he lost. It says at first he talked quite stiffly, like a professor. I haven&#039;t read the whole thing, it&#039;s a several parter. But what quotes I saw, back then he was using words that actually meant something.
http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2007/02/12/obama_natural/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama finding HIS voice! &#8212; in Chicago 2000 election he lost. It says at first he talked quite stiffly, like a professor. I haven&#8217;t read the whole thing, it&#8217;s a several parter. But what quotes I saw, back then he was using words that actually meant something.<br />
<a href="http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2007/02/12/obama_natural/" rel="nofollow">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2007/02/12/obama_natural/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DemAC</title>
		<link>http://www.hillaryis44.org/2008/01/13/rezko-for-dummies-part-ii/#comment-36773</link>
		<dc:creator>DemAC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 14:50:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hillaryis44.org/?p=438#comment-36773</guid>
		<description>admin,
See my &quot;theory&quot; above. Find the doctor. Follow the money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>admin,<br />
See my &#8220;theory&#8221; above. Find the doctor. Follow the money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.hillaryis44.org/2008/01/13/rezko-for-dummies-part-ii/#comment-36769</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 14:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hillaryis44.org/?p=438#comment-36769</guid>
		<description>Ignoring reality, we get this idiocy from Newsweek regarding Obama and Rezko:  

http://www.newsweek.com/id/91755/page/4

Any candidate who runs as a reformer is bound to attract close scrutiny of his own ethics. Chicago newspapers have published extensive stories about Obama&#039;s ties to Tony Rezko, a fund-raiser and developer who is under indictment for fraud. In 2005, Obama bought a house in Chicago. On the same day, Rezko bought the plot of land next to it, and later sold Obama a slice of his plot so the senator could expand his yard. At the time it was widely reported that Rezko was under investigation by the U.S. attorney for allegedly shaking down firms that wanted to do business with state agencies. There is no evidence that Obama gave any political favors to Rezko. He voted against some of Rezko&#039;s business interests as a state senator, and gave thousands of dollars in campaign contributions from Rezko to charity. Obama has called the deal with Rezko &quot;a boneheaded mistake.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ignoring reality, we get this idiocy from Newsweek regarding Obama and Rezko:  </p>
<p><a href="http://www.newsweek.com/id/91755/page/4" rel="nofollow">http://www.newsweek.com/id/91755/page/4</a></p>
<p>Any candidate who runs as a reformer is bound to attract close scrutiny of his own ethics. Chicago newspapers have published extensive stories about Obama&#8217;s ties to Tony Rezko, a fund-raiser and developer who is under indictment for fraud. In 2005, Obama bought a house in Chicago. On the same day, Rezko bought the plot of land next to it, and later sold Obama a slice of his plot so the senator could expand his yard. At the time it was widely reported that Rezko was under investigation by the U.S. attorney for allegedly shaking down firms that wanted to do business with state agencies. There is no evidence that Obama gave any political favors to Rezko. He voted against some of Rezko&#8217;s business interests as a state senator, and gave thousands of dollars in campaign contributions from Rezko to charity. Obama has called the deal with Rezko &#8220;a boneheaded mistake.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
