<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stinky B.O.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hillaryis44.org/2007/10/13/stinky-bo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hillaryis44.org/2007/10/13/stinky-bo/</link>
	<description>We started this website because we believe Senator Hillary Clinton will be an excellent 44th President of the United States.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 03:43:27 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Hillary Is 44 &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Obama&#8217;s Iran Lie(s)</title>
		<link>http://www.hillaryis44.org/2007/10/13/stinky-bo/#comment-10969</link>
		<dc:creator>Hillary Is 44 &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Obama&#8217;s Iran Lie(s)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 15:45:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hillaryis44.org/?p=281#comment-10969</guid>
		<description>[...] October 13, 2007 we wrote the appropriately titled Stinky B.O.. We highlighted, repeatedly, something Senator Biden said about Barack Obama and Obama&#8217;s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] October 13, 2007 we wrote the appropriately titled Stinky B.O.. We highlighted, repeatedly, something Senator Biden said about Barack Obama and Obama&#8217;s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cotton-eyed Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.hillaryis44.org/2007/10/13/stinky-bo/#comment-8523</link>
		<dc:creator>Cotton-eyed Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 15:32:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hillaryis44.org/?p=281#comment-8523</guid>
		<description>In regards to the GE, more evidence surfaces almost every day that, should ex-mayor Rudy get the republican nod, the republicans will be toast.

Just this past week-end, on both the Chris Matthews show and on the Timmy Russert show, the idea of a third party challenge to 
Rudy being nominated gain more credence.  One of the panelists mentioned a rumor that had Michael Bloomberg, while not running himself, possibly financing a third party challenge against Rudy (apparently, Bloomberg can&#039;t stand Rudy).  In their discussion of this topic, they all agreed that any conservative third party challenge to Rudy&#039;s nomination would, in their words, be &quot;a disaster&quot; for the Republican Party!

The Politics1.com website talks about either (or both) Ron Paul or Tom Tancredo giving a third party run a try if/when they drop out of the Republican campaign, Paul on the Libertarian Party ticket again and Tancredo on the Constitution Party ticket.

Now this might be a story worth keeping an eye on!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In regards to the GE, more evidence surfaces almost every day that, should ex-mayor Rudy get the republican nod, the republicans will be toast.</p>
<p>Just this past week-end, on both the Chris Matthews show and on the Timmy Russert show, the idea of a third party challenge to<br />
Rudy being nominated gain more credence.  One of the panelists mentioned a rumor that had Michael Bloomberg, while not running himself, possibly financing a third party challenge against Rudy (apparently, Bloomberg can&#8217;t stand Rudy).  In their discussion of this topic, they all agreed that any conservative third party challenge to Rudy&#8217;s nomination would, in their words, be &#8220;a disaster&#8221; for the Republican Party!</p>
<p>The Politics1.com website talks about either (or both) Ron Paul or Tom Tancredo giving a third party run a try if/when they drop out of the Republican campaign, Paul on the Libertarian Party ticket again and Tancredo on the Constitution Party ticket.</p>
<p>Now this might be a story worth keeping an eye on!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canaan</title>
		<link>http://www.hillaryis44.org/2007/10/13/stinky-bo/#comment-8503</link>
		<dc:creator>Canaan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 01:32:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hillaryis44.org/?p=281#comment-8503</guid>
		<description>Obama  claims he doesn&#039;t object to the terrorist designation.  He just doesn&#039;t think we should do anything about Iran attacking American troops in Iraq.

Also, it&#039;s strange that he admits to being &#039;out of the loop&#039; in the Senate.  Last man to know about a critical vote?  He doesn&#039;t even know how Congress works but he wants to move on to White House.

Yeah, I watched Stephanopolous this morning.  I think those guys just walk in off the street and start talking.  Donaldson says &quot;Hill is sitting on her lead.&quot;  He means she isn&#039;t making silly negative attacks so he can have something to gossip about on the talk shows.

Steph did show the actual video though.  People saw an ultra-leftist bellowing at Hillary.  That can only help.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama  claims he doesn&#8217;t object to the terrorist designation.  He just doesn&#8217;t think we should do anything about Iran attacking American troops in Iraq.</p>
<p>Also, it&#8217;s strange that he admits to being &#8216;out of the loop&#8217; in the Senate.  Last man to know about a critical vote?  He doesn&#8217;t even know how Congress works but he wants to move on to White House.</p>
<p>Yeah, I watched Stephanopolous this morning.  I think those guys just walk in off the street and start talking.  Donaldson says &#8220;Hill is sitting on her lead.&#8221;  He means she isn&#8217;t making silly negative attacks so he can have something to gossip about on the talk shows.</p>
<p>Steph did show the actual video though.  People saw an ultra-leftist bellowing at Hillary.  That can only help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.hillaryis44.org/2007/10/13/stinky-bo/#comment-8478</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 20:47:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hillaryis44.org/?p=281#comment-8478</guid>
		<description>Paula, 
Cokie must not read the New York Times.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paula,<br />
Cokie must not read the New York Times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paula</title>
		<link>http://www.hillaryis44.org/2007/10/13/stinky-bo/#comment-8476</link>
		<dc:creator>Paula</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 20:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hillaryis44.org/?p=281#comment-8476</guid>
		<description>Good point, admin.

BTW, that Cokie Roberts statement has me scratching me head. Hillary&#039;s been getting lots of negative press. Where has she been? Oh, never mind, I know the answer to that, lol.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point, admin.</p>
<p>BTW, that Cokie Roberts statement has me scratching me head. Hillary&#8217;s been getting lots of negative press. Where has she been? Oh, never mind, I know the answer to that, lol.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.hillaryis44.org/2007/10/13/stinky-bo/#comment-8464</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 19:23:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hillaryis44.org/?p=281#comment-8464</guid>
		<description>Regarding Nevada and all general election polls we ignore them.  Once the nomination is secured and Hillary decides to speak to independents and voters outside the Democratic base we have no doubt she will win them over.  All things in their time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding Nevada and all general election polls we ignore them.  Once the nomination is secured and Hillary decides to speak to independents and voters outside the Democratic base we have no doubt she will win them over.  All things in their time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.hillaryis44.org/2007/10/13/stinky-bo/#comment-8463</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 19:21:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hillaryis44.org/?p=281#comment-8463</guid>
		<description>The next debate JoeFriday will tell the tale.  Obama enjoys attacking Hillary when she is not present but folds when she takes him on.  Ditto Edwards.  Obama and Edwards, goaded by their rabid supporters and donors will have to attack her without respite at the next debate.  We worry for her but know she can handle herself in typical fearless fashion.  Still, we don&#039;t like the idea of Hillary, alone, being attacked.  We did not like it when the attacks were against Bill Clinton either.  We know we will be more nervous and worried than Hillary at the next debate.  

We hope Joe Biden and the other senators ask Obama why he did not know or chose to ignore the vote on the Revolutionary Guards, preferring to continue campaigning.  BTW, Obama has a private plane and the trip from NH to Washington, D.C. is not that long.  Assuming Obama is not lying, which Biden seems to be politely saying, why didn&#039;t he make it back to Washington when the debate on the resolution started?  There was plenty of time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The next debate JoeFriday will tell the tale.  Obama enjoys attacking Hillary when she is not present but folds when she takes him on.  Ditto Edwards.  Obama and Edwards, goaded by their rabid supporters and donors will have to attack her without respite at the next debate.  We worry for her but know she can handle herself in typical fearless fashion.  Still, we don&#8217;t like the idea of Hillary, alone, being attacked.  We did not like it when the attacks were against Bill Clinton either.  We know we will be more nervous and worried than Hillary at the next debate.  </p>
<p>We hope Joe Biden and the other senators ask Obama why he did not know or chose to ignore the vote on the Revolutionary Guards, preferring to continue campaigning.  BTW, Obama has a private plane and the trip from NH to Washington, D.C. is not that long.  Assuming Obama is not lying, which Biden seems to be politely saying, why didn&#8217;t he make it back to Washington when the debate on the resolution started?  There was plenty of time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hillary Is 44 &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Stinky B.O., Part II</title>
		<link>http://www.hillaryis44.org/2007/10/13/stinky-bo/#comment-8462</link>
		<dc:creator>Hillary Is 44 &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Stinky B.O., Part II</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 19:07:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hillaryis44.org/?p=281#comment-8462</guid>
		<description>[...] Archives : Links : About : Webmaster : Confidential Tips :    Sunday, Oct 14th - 3:07 pm            &#171; Stinky B.O. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Archives : Links : About : Webmaster : Confidential Tips :    Sunday, Oct 14th &#8211; 3:07 pm            &laquo; Stinky B.O. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Friday</title>
		<link>http://www.hillaryis44.org/2007/10/13/stinky-bo/#comment-8458</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Friday</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 18:19:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hillaryis44.org/?p=281#comment-8458</guid>
		<description>Our national school marm, Cokie Roberts, on ABC&#039;s &#039;THIS WEEK&#039; this morning:

&quot;Hillary Clinton, to me what&#039;s interesting, she has had SUCH a spate of positive stories, it&#039;s GOTTA turn. It&#039;s a combination of the fact that the press starts to get nervous that everybody has anointed her already, and said that she&#039;s doing such a good job, and her opponents of both parties, because the Republicans are going after her too, start to say jeepers, we better get in there and do some real damage.&quot;

Everybody should watch the video of this. Her &quot;such a spate&quot; quote was accompanied by a HUGE eye roll, and she stated the &quot;her opponents of both parties&quot; &quot;better get in there and do some real damage&quot; with such wide-eyed GLEE. The women simply CANNOT STAND IT that Senator Clinton is leading against her opponents of BOTH parties. She just about had a COW.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our national school marm, Cokie Roberts, on ABC&#8217;s &#8216;THIS WEEK&#8217; this morning:</p>
<p>&#8220;Hillary Clinton, to me what&#8217;s interesting, she has had SUCH a spate of positive stories, it&#8217;s GOTTA turn. It&#8217;s a combination of the fact that the press starts to get nervous that everybody has anointed her already, and said that she&#8217;s doing such a good job, and her opponents of both parties, because the Republicans are going after her too, start to say jeepers, we better get in there and do some real damage.&#8221;</p>
<p>Everybody should watch the video of this. Her &#8220;such a spate&#8221; quote was accompanied by a HUGE eye roll, and she stated the &#8220;her opponents of both parties&#8221; &#8220;better get in there and do some real damage&#8221; with such wide-eyed GLEE. The women simply CANNOT STAND IT that Senator Clinton is leading against her opponents of BOTH parties. She just about had a COW.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheRealist</title>
		<link>http://www.hillaryis44.org/2007/10/13/stinky-bo/#comment-8457</link>
		<dc:creator>TheRealist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 18:05:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hillaryis44.org/?p=281#comment-8457</guid>
		<description>The more important number is her EIGHTEEN point lead in the primary. Even the site doesn&#039;t believe the GE numbers, nor do I.

www.campaigndiaries.com/2007/10/presidential-diary-edwards.html

Nevada stays red
Nevada ended up featuring a very close race in 2004, with George Bush coming out with a narrow victory. With Democrats looking at the West for new electoral votes, they see Nevada as one of their most promising states. But a new Mason-Dixon poll suggests that Clinton would have a very difficult time being competitive in the state:

Clinton would lose all three of her match-ups, never exceeding 44% -- even against Mitt Romney! She loses 51-44 against Rudy Giuliani, 50-44 against Fred Thompson, and 49-43 against Mitt Romney.
Mason-Dixon did not poll other Democrats in general election races.
In her primary race, Clinton leads with 39%, with Obama at 21%, John Edwards at 9%, and Bill Richardson, who hails from a neighboring state, at 8%.
Among Republicans, Giuliani has the lead at 28%, followed by Thompson at 23%, and Romney at 17%. An ARG poll taken a few days ago had Romney and Giuliani in a statistical tie, 31% to 30%.
We are not used to seeing Clinton be not at all competitive in a state, as Republicans are usually in an awful situation in most state poll. So this has to be confirmed by other polls.
posted by Taniel at 12:57 PM</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The more important number is her EIGHTEEN point lead in the primary. Even the site doesn&#8217;t believe the GE numbers, nor do I.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.campaigndiaries.com/2007/10/presidential-diary-edwards.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.campaigndiaries.com/2007/10/presidential-diary-edwards.html</a></p>
<p>Nevada stays red<br />
Nevada ended up featuring a very close race in 2004, with George Bush coming out with a narrow victory. With Democrats looking at the West for new electoral votes, they see Nevada as one of their most promising states. But a new Mason-Dixon poll suggests that Clinton would have a very difficult time being competitive in the state:</p>
<p>Clinton would lose all three of her match-ups, never exceeding 44% &#8212; even against Mitt Romney! She loses 51-44 against Rudy Giuliani, 50-44 against Fred Thompson, and 49-43 against Mitt Romney.<br />
Mason-Dixon did not poll other Democrats in general election races.<br />
In her primary race, Clinton leads with 39%, with Obama at 21%, John Edwards at 9%, and Bill Richardson, who hails from a neighboring state, at 8%.<br />
Among Republicans, Giuliani has the lead at 28%, followed by Thompson at 23%, and Romney at 17%. An ARG poll taken a few days ago had Romney and Giuliani in a statistical tie, 31% to 30%.<br />
We are not used to seeing Clinton be not at all competitive in a state, as Republicans are usually in an awful situation in most state poll. So this has to be confirmed by other polls.<br />
posted by Taniel at 12:57 PM</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
