Oprah can’t blame it on her staff. News reports about Alexi Giannoulias and his financing of “Jaws” go back months if not years. We wrote about Alexi and “Jaws” several months ago. Oprah must also know of “Jaws” financier Giannoulias’ big fundraiser and further funding promises to Obama.
Oprah must also know about local boy Patrick Fitzgerald. Oprah perhaps read our article from April 30, 2007 “Will Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald Destroy the Obama Campaign?” about the pending doom facing the Barack Obama campaign. Chicago legend Oprah must know Chicago legend Patrick Fitzgerald who is well known as the indictor and convictor of Vice President Cheney aide Lewis “Scooter” Libby. Patrick Fitzgerald also put Illinois Governor George Ryan behind bars for six years. Surely Oprah heard about that.
Oprah must also know that Fitzgerald’s United States Federal Prosecutor Office for Illinois has filed a 65 page indictment of Obama’s other financier and long time friend – indicted slumlord Antoin “Tony” Rezko .
Oprah must also know about the trial that has been scheduled for February 25, 2008 by U.S. District Judge Amy St. Eve. Judge Eve called the trial date of Febuary 25, 2008 a firm date. The trial preparations and news will coincide with the first Democratic Primaries and Caucuses in January and February 2008.
And Oprah must have heard that Rezko business partner Orlando Jones went Hsu (who blamed Obama in his suicide note) one better and beached himself.
What will Oprah say?
What did Oprah say when she read the L.A. Times profile of Obama called Obama: A Fresh Face Or An Old-School Tactician?
Here is what we excerpted from that article in Barack Obama’s Mob:
He managed to burnish a reformer’s reputation while swimming in the muddy waters of special-interest- infested state politics.
He worked on a nice-guy image while practicing the hardball and brawling tactics of Chicago-style politics.
Now, promoting himself as a fresh face on the national political stage, proclaiming his distance from lobbyists and the Washington culture of special interests, Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) has to contend with his own history.
From Chicago to Springfield, his past is filled with decidedly old-school political tactics — a history of befriending powerful local elders, assisting benefactors and special interests, and neutralizing rivals.
Obama may be packaged as something new among presidential contenders, but in this town where politics is played like a blood sport he fit right in.
The Babe In The Woods or as we termed it long ago, The Innocent:
“He knows how the game is played,” said Jay Stewart, executive director of Better Government Assn., a nonpartisan group that honored Obama for helping overhaul state ethics law. Stewart called Illinois politics “deeply troubled, if not corrupt” at its core.
“It is very difficult to come out of a system that is flawed and walk out unscathed. Sen. Obama has done better than most. But it’s not as if he is a babe in the woods,” Stewart said.
The “new” politics it turns out is the same ‘knock ’em off the ballot’ Chicago politics.
In fact, Obama’s first venture into politics suggested he came to the game ready to throw elbows. That was in 1995. He had been invited to succeed Alice Palmer when she left the state Senate to run for Congress.
He reached out to local power brokers and financial backers — among them entrepreneur Antoin Rezko and politically connected Al Johnson, a retired auto dealer who was the late Mayor Harold Washington’s bridge to the business community.
Palmer backed Obama too. But friendly succession hit a bump when Palmer’s congressional bid failed. She asked Obama to step aside and let her run for her old seat in the state Senate.
Obama did more than refuse. The onetime voting rights activist in Chicago’s poor districts challenged the signatures qualifying Palmer for the ballot. Palmer was disqualified, and Obama, then 35, took office running unopposed.
“Some can say it was cold, but that is how the game is played,” said Illinois state Sen. Donne E. Trotter, a Democrat whose district bordered Obama’s.
Antoin “Tony” Rezko and his pal Obama. When will “reformer” “new politics” big ethics talker Obama return the Rezko money?
That first race cemented ties with Johnson and Rezko that have spanned Obama’s political career. Both made significant donations. And Rezko became one of Obama’s most important patrons. He and his associates are responsible for $160,000 in campaign aid over the past 12 years.
Rezko has helped numerous politicians from both parties. In 2003, he gave President Bush $4,000 and co-hosted a fundraiser in downtown Chicago said to have generated $3 million for the president’s reelection.
Again, when will Obama return all the Rezko money?
But Rezko also represents another rule of old-style politics: Beware of your friends. Last fall, Rezko was indicted here on federal public corruption charges, forcing politicians, including Obama, to distance themselves.
As to the ‘aw-shucks’ ‘this is about you not about me’ ‘people want me to run for president’ I’m a shy innocent, not quite. [Notice, with a man it is called ambition, for a woman it is calculation and worse]:
Armed with ambition Obama arrived in Springfield with another familiar tool from the kit of Chicago politics — ambition.
Cynthia K. Miller, who ran his district office, recalls an incident shortly after Obama’s election. She had taken a longer-than-normal lunch break and returned to find an impatient state senator waiting for her.
He didn’t raise his voice, she said, but he turned stern as he explained the importance of time management and the need to focus on goals. Then he shared his own goal: “I plan to be president.”
“When he said it, he wasn’t just whistling Dixie. I believed,” Miller said. “I thought I needed to work harder” to help make it happen.
Obama, the voting rights advocate who knocked Democrats off the ballot, also loved, loved, loved his monied friends even as his constituents froze in the tenements owned by his monied patrons.
Obama’s state Senate district was a mix of mansions, trendy town homes and tenements. It encompassed the leafy campus of the University of Chicago, where Obama worked part time as a law school lecturer before and after his election.
Talk-show host Oprah Winfrey, who is having a fundraiser for Obama at her Montecito estate in Santa Barbara County today, keeps a residence in the old district. The Rev. Jesse Jackson, who has endorsed Obama, and Minister Louis Farrakhan, head of the black separatist Nation of Islam, live within three blocks of Obama’s home.
Ripublican Dillard loved Obama and even makes campaign commercials for Obama that almost instantly have to be pulled off the air.
He teamed with Republican state Sen. Kirk Dillard to revoke a law that allowed lawmakers to convert campaign money to personal use, for some legislators a source of substantial largesse.
“It didn’t take long to see he is a man of intelligence and ethics,” said Dillard, who recently taped a pro-Obama television ad that aired in neighboring Iowa.
Ethics Obama when it is convenient. [Any one wonder what Obama is going to do with all that cash after he pulls out of the presential race? Will Obama follow the spirit of the law and not convert his campaign money for personal use or to another of his campaigns, now that it is not convenient for him because now he is the guy with money, not like when he passed the law which hurt the other guy with money?]
In 1999, Obama voted against an expansion of gambling, even though two of his biggest backers — Rezko and Johnson — were to share interest in a new casino planned in suburban Chicago.
And Obama backed a ban on fundraising on state property — again teaming with Dillard — an action aimed at Springfield lobbyists, like Alfred Ronan, noted for handing out campaign checks in the Capitol.
But there are other, less flattering examples.
Obama later would tap Ronan, who represented state gambling interests, and others in his firm for $10,500 in campaign donations. And in 2003, while running for the U.S. Senate, Obama switched positions and cast a decisive vote authorizing the state to operate casinos.
How much did Ronan make from big gambling profits for himself and his ‘friends’? And doesn’t Obama hate lobbyists? But he will have lunch with them? Isn’t this just free access for lobbyists? [Check out Glenn Thrush and Lynn Sweet on Obama’s relationship with lobbyists in our article Obama Fights The Facts]
Ronan said his financial support for Obama was unrelated to any legislative assistance. “I supported him for U.S. Senate, and I support him for president — and he voted against me 100% of the time; or, maybe it was only 98% of the time,” he said in a recent interview.
The lobbyist also recalled that any time he had lunch or played golf with Obama, the state senator paid his own way.
Obama Fights The Facts nails the lobbyist question but the L.A. Times does a good job too. No wonder Ripublicans love him:
As a presidential candidate, Obama has been critical of the congressional system of doling out money for pet projects. But he is no stranger to pork-barrel politics and the practice of spreading government money around his district. In Springfield he once directed state funds to a nonprofit group headed by a Republican and former ballot foe, Yesse B. Yehudah.
Yehudah barely registered a ripple of meaningful opposition, drawing only 10% of the vote in his 1998 challenge of Obama.
The following year, a nonprofit run by Yehudah, a social services organization called Fulfilling Our Responsibility Unto Mankind, began seeking state support. At the same time, Obama was considering mounting an ambitious challenge to U.S. Rep. Bobby L. Rush, a fellow Democrat.
Former foe Yehudah stepped up early to help. In November 1999, five people who worked for the Republican’s nonprofit organization each gave $1,000 checks to Obama’s congressional campaign committee. Yehudah makes no secret of his goal.
“We want [politicians] to know that when we sit down, we’re serious,” Yehudah said. “They know it when a $1,000 check comes in.”
Is this why Obama is running against a Clinton, for revenge? And yes, another Innocent Coincidence:
Obama lost his congressional bid. President Clinton backed incumbent Rush, who received twice as many primary votes as Obama. Obama was left with a $40,000 debt.
Later that year, Yehudah associates pitched in an additional $5,000 to help retire Obama’s debt. The contributions were recorded on Oct. 7, 2000, three days after the Illinois Senate, at Obama’s behest, approved a $75,000 state grant to Yehudah’s nonprofit, state records show.
In an interview, Yehudah said the commitment for the grant was secured months earlier, in July. He called timing of the donations a coincidence.
The donations were modest by political standards, as was Obama’s relatively small assist to the nonprofit group of his ex-rival and new benefactor. But in Illinois, “government actions often occur around the time of campaign donations,” said Stewart of the Better Government Assn. “The answer is always the same: It’s always a coincidence.”
Obama spokesman Bill Burton said there was no connection between the campaign donations and the grant to Yehudah’s organization. “Of course not,” he said.
Obama has real good judgment on his friends, doesn’t he?
By 2002, Obama was preparing for his next challenge, a run for the U.S. Senate. Also that year, the Illinois attorney general sued Yehudah over allegations of kickbacks unrelated to the state grant. It was settled out of court.
Three days after the suit was filed, Obama returned one batch of donations totaling $5,000.
Obama the unambitious, unpretentious, aw-shucks guy, always ready to raise money, while publicly denouncing money influence:
In November 2002, Democrats took control of the Illinois Senate. Emil Jones Jr., 71, a 34-year veteran of Springfield and the new Senate leader, said he was approached immediately by Obama.
He “knew if he had me, it would give him power,” Jones said in a recent interview. “Having me would force politicians in Chicago to be supportive. I could leverage folks to raise money.”
Obama told Jones: “You have the power to make a U.S. senator.”
“That sounds damned good. Let’s go for it,” Jones said he replied.
With Jones’ help, Obama got his pick of bills to champion leading up to the 2004 election.
Money, money, money, money.
From his early days in state politics, Obama also opened relationships with moneyed interests that have continued into his presidential campaign, contributing to his record-breaking fundraising statistics.
One of his biggest backers is a firm he helped to land state pension fund investments.
Black-owned investment fund managers came to Obama in 2000 and 2001, complaining that they were “not getting any business from our own state pensions,” he recounts on the campaign trail.
Obama took up their cause and led delegations of minority investment firms to Illinois state pension board meetings, urging board members to shift some of their funds to such firms. During a recent appearance before the Urban League, Obama singled out Ariel Capital as one respected investment house that he had championed.
“I simply said, ‘Listen to what these folks have to say,’ ” Obama said, “and in about six months they got about a half billion dollars’ worth of business simply on their own excellence.”
By 2005, Ariel Capital managed $452 million in teacher pension money. And as his investor-friends won business, Obama received political benefit.
In the four years after he went to bat for them before state pension boards, partners in those minority-owned firms donated $190,000 to his campaigns, including his U.S. Senate run.
Ariel has been particularly generous. Its partners and employees have donated $135,000 to Obama’s campaigns, including more than $50,000 to his presidential run. Two of its principles are among Obama’s presidential campaign fundraisers, having raised at least $50,000 more each.
In 2006, meanwhile, the teacher pension board severed its relationship with Ariel Capital, concluding that returns on its investment were insufficient. Ariel executives declined to discuss the matter but defended their strategy as one that favors long-term returns over volatile short-term gains.
Antoin “Tony” Rezko, Obama’s long time friend, and business partner of recent suicide Orlando Jones.
Operation Board Games is Illinois’ latest corruption scandal, and the name of a federal law enforcement crackdown on alleged extortion of individuals and companies doing business with state boards.
Obama and the investment funds he promoted are not implicated in any wrongdoing. But the case resulted in Rezko’s indictment last October, sending shivers through the reelection campaign of another of his political friends and beneficiaries, Gov. Rod R. Blagojevich.
The governor’s supporters questioned the timing of that indictment, coming one month before the November 2006 election. Nonetheless, Blagojevich won reelection in a tough race.
On Rezko the L.A. Times falls flat. The Obama/Rezko house story they get wrong. Here is the accurate, and well documented, house story as reported in Obama Fights The Facts (and don’t miss A NewNewDeal’s comments):
In Obama’s $925,000 Question we pointed out that Obama wanted to buy a house he could not afford (See the Chicago Tribune article Rezko Owns Vacant Lot Next To Obama’s Home). Lack of money did not prevent Obama from obtaining the house. Obama simply went to his slumlord friend Rezko and got the slumlord friend to purchase part of the property. Obama obtained the valuable property with a $1.65 million dollar house on it for a discount of $300,000. Obama’s slumlord friend paid full price for a yard full of grass. At the time the slumlord friend was reported to be under investigation for corruption and kickbacks.
[We want to also note that both properties were originally 1 property. This very clear fact is constantly missed. Obama went to the sellers and asked them to split the property in 2 so he could buy the house at a discount and Obama’s slumlord friend Rezko would buy the yard for full price. In the words of the Chicago Tribune, “The same day the Obamas closed on the house, the Rezkos closed on the purchase of the adjoining vacant lot, which once was the estate’s lush side yard.”]
Here is the L.A. Times’s flawed version of the Obama/Rezko house scandal:
It remains to be seen whether any fallout from Rezko’s case will cloud Obama’s presidential campaign.
Already the senator has had to admit to poor judgment in a personal transaction involving his financial patron. It arose during Obama’s purchase of his current house.
In 2005, after winning his U.S. Senate seat, Obama bought a Hyde Park home for $1.65 million. But there was a glitch. The seller also wanted to sell an adjoining strip of vacant land, according to an account in the Chicago Tribune, which first disclosed details of the transaction.
Rezko’s wife, Rita, stepped in to buy it. The Rezkos later sold back a 10-foot portion of that strip to the Obamas, and they have since transferred the remaining strip to their attorney.
Obama, who appears to have benefited from the odd transaction, concedes his role in it was “boneheaded.”
The L.A. Times gets this right:
Rezko remains part of the history that is likely to trail Obama into the presidential campaign. His federal trial is scheduled to begin in February, during the opening rounds of the 2008 Democratic primary season.
Maybe someone can clue Dan Morain (firstname.lastname@example.org) in on the full facts from his otherwise excellent story.
Oprah should read Dan Morain’s article as well.