Comments on: WATCH BARACK – Then AND Now http://www.hillaryis44.org/2007/07/31/watch-barack-then-and-now/ We started this website because we believe Senator Hillary Clinton will be an excellent 44th President of the United States. Tue, 16 Mar 2010 13:15:27 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 By: mp http://www.hillaryis44.org/2007/07/31/watch-barack-then-and-now/#comment-1442 mp Thu, 02 Aug 2007 14:08:46 +0000 http://www.hillaryis44.org/?p=183#comment-1442 I think Hillary agrees with "covet" actions with predator technologies etc if they knew the location of Osama/high level terrorist. She does not agree/mention with sending major combat ground troops to fight a war. This is a big difference....she refers to using covet operations like they did in Bill clinton's time. Also I think it is wise to listen to even McCain on this. Toppling Musharaf to be replaced by Islamic fundamentalist in Pakistan is not in our interest. Karzai and Musharaf are meeting soon.....so I think it would be IRRESPONSIBLE for any candidate from any party to keep on talking of major WAR with Pakistan at this time or even in 2009 when really Obama would be able to really execute any of his agenda.. Chris Dodd said it well...dangerous and irresponsible!!!!! Note: I am not a suppoter of McCain or Dodd. I think Hillary agrees with “covet” actions with predator technologies etc if they knew the location of Osama/high level terrorist. She does not agree/mention with sending major combat ground troops to fight a war. This is a big difference….she refers to using covet operations like they did in Bill clinton’s time.

Also I think it is wise to listen to even McCain on this. Toppling Musharaf to be replaced by Islamic fundamentalist in Pakistan is not in our interest.

Karzai and Musharaf are meeting soon…..so I think it would be IRRESPONSIBLE for any candidate from any party to keep on talking of major WAR with Pakistan at this time or even in 2009 when really Obama would be able to really execute any of his agenda..
Chris Dodd said it well…dangerous and irresponsible!!!!!

Note: I am not a suppoter of McCain or Dodd.

]]> By: Mrs. Smith http://www.hillaryis44.org/2007/07/31/watch-barack-then-and-now/#comment-1424 Mrs. Smith Thu, 02 Aug 2007 05:54:09 +0000 http://www.hillaryis44.org/?p=183#comment-1424 Thanks, Kegs... Hmm...Bo's own site? Well, it must be true if he went with a few other witnesses...er, senators. Thanks for taking the time. I appreciate it! Mrs. S Thanks, Kegs…

Hmm…Bo’s own site? Well, it must be true if he went with a few other witnesses…er, senators.

Thanks for taking the time. I appreciate it!

Mrs. S

]]> By: Secret http://www.hillaryis44.org/2007/07/31/watch-barack-then-and-now/#comment-1413 Secret Thu, 02 Aug 2007 04:25:47 +0000 http://www.hillaryis44.org/?p=183#comment-1413 Kostner, Even John Mccain seems to show more readiness than Edwards & Richardson - as you say they both clueless - if not spineless! I mean if you are not ready to attack Obama - in the hopes that he would pick you as his VP - incase he wins - then they simply are not ready!!!! They have squandered such a magnificent opportunity - what a shame! Kostner,
Even John Mccain seems to show more readiness than Edwards & Richardson – as you say they both clueless – if not spineless! I mean if you are not ready to attack Obama – in the hopes that he would pick you as his VP – incase he wins – then they simply are not ready!!!!
They have squandered such a magnificent opportunity – what a shame!

]]> By: kostner http://www.hillaryis44.org/2007/07/31/watch-barack-then-and-now/#comment-1409 kostner Thu, 02 Aug 2007 03:36:24 +0000 http://www.hillaryis44.org/?p=183#comment-1409 PALO ALTO, Calif.—Republican presidential candidate Sen. John McCain said Sen. Barack Obama's threat to use military force to get rid of terrorists in Pakistan shows he does not understand the complexities of the region. McCain said the situation in Pakistan is "very delicate," since the country's leader, Gen. Pervez Musharraf, is an American ally with a tenuous hold on power. The Arizona senator said a direct American attack on the country could cause a backlash that might topple Musharraf. "I think it's kind of a simplistic view of a very complex situation," McCain said at a press conference following an appearance at Stanford University. He advocated using covert action "before we declare that we're going to bomb the daylights out of them." PALO ALTO, Calif.—Republican presidential candidate Sen. John McCain said Sen. Barack Obama’s threat to use military force to get rid of terrorists in Pakistan shows he does not understand the complexities of the region.
McCain said the situation in Pakistan is “very delicate,” since the country’s leader, Gen. Pervez Musharraf, is an American ally with a tenuous hold on power. The Arizona senator said a direct American attack on the country could cause a backlash that might topple Musharraf.

“I think it’s kind of a simplistic view of a very complex situation,” McCain said at a press conference following an appearance at Stanford University. He advocated using covert action “before we declare that we’re going to bomb the daylights out of them.”

]]> By: kostner http://www.hillaryis44.org/2007/07/31/watch-barack-then-and-now/#comment-1408 kostner Thu, 02 Aug 2007 03:33:59 +0000 http://www.hillaryis44.org/?p=183#comment-1408 kitforhill, I don't like either of the current running candidates as V.P. Nobody has impressed me so far. I'm sure Hillary will think outside the box. I like Webb, Mark Warner, or Clark maybe. No Vilsack, please. It's Hillary's choice, VP, means very little in the end. kitforhill,

I don’t like either of the current running candidates as V.P. Nobody has impressed me so far. I’m sure Hillary will think outside the box. I like Webb, Mark Warner, or Clark maybe. No Vilsack, please.

It’s Hillary’s choice, VP, means very little in the end.

]]> By: kostner http://www.hillaryis44.org/2007/07/31/watch-barack-then-and-now/#comment-1407 kostner Thu, 02 Aug 2007 03:30:48 +0000 http://www.hillaryis44.org/?p=183#comment-1407 Secret, Did I analyze this already? It's a even worse blunder than his last week's flop. He basically angered lots of Edwards supporters who are far leftists in primaries. They are closer than ever to Hillary. If Edwards drops out after IA, I doubt they'll be happy to go to Obama due to this sort of belligerent rhetoric. When you look around right wing blogs, Obama's stunt has been roundly ridiculed. They are mocking his newly created 'manly' man image. Pakistan governorment is starting to make noise. If tomorrow, they ask Obama for clarification , you can bet the press will jump on this. All these reinforced his naive and irresponsible image. I think it's a terrible mistake on his behalf. He's obviously overdone his 'toughness'... What puzzles me is that Edwards/Richardson campaigns are as clueless as Obama's. They should immediately jump on him, instead, either is willing to take a shot. These guys are just not ready for prime time. Hillary seems to play smart, she does not need to do anything, just let Obama hang himself. Secret,

Did I analyze this already? It’s a even worse blunder than his last week’s flop.
He basically angered lots of Edwards supporters who are far leftists in primaries. They are closer than ever to Hillary. If Edwards drops out after IA, I doubt they’ll be happy to go to Obama due to this sort of belligerent rhetoric.

When you look around right wing blogs, Obama’s stunt has been roundly ridiculed. They are mocking his newly created ‘manly’ man image.
Pakistan governorment is starting to make noise. If tomorrow, they ask Obama for clarification , you can bet the press will jump on this.

All these reinforced his naive and irresponsible image. I think it’s a terrible mistake on his behalf. He’s obviously overdone his ‘toughness’…

What puzzles me is that Edwards/Richardson campaigns are as clueless as Obama’s. They should immediately jump on him, instead, either is willing to take a shot. These guys are just not ready for prime time.

Hillary seems to play smart, she does not need to do anything, just let Obama hang himself.

]]> By: Secret http://www.hillaryis44.org/2007/07/31/watch-barack-then-and-now/#comment-1406 Secret Thu, 02 Aug 2007 03:11:10 +0000 http://www.hillaryis44.org/?p=183#comment-1406 Kostner perhaps? Kostner perhaps?

]]> By: Secret http://www.hillaryis44.org/2007/07/31/watch-barack-then-and-now/#comment-1405 Secret Thu, 02 Aug 2007 03:10:48 +0000 http://www.hillaryis44.org/?p=183#comment-1405 What do you guys think about "Invading Pakistan" by Obama??? Pundits have given thumps down to this statement! Any thoughts?? What do you guys think about

“Invading Pakistan” by Obama???

Pundits have given thumps down to this statement!

Any thoughts??

]]> By: HillaryLandRocks http://www.hillaryis44.org/2007/07/31/watch-barack-then-and-now/#comment-1404 HillaryLandRocks Thu, 02 Aug 2007 03:07:37 +0000 http://www.hillaryis44.org/?p=183#comment-1404 Paula - Remember when I said that when it comes to boasting about his experience, Obama reminds me of a little girl who puts on mommy's lipstick and then stamps around the house in oversized shoes? Here's the lipstick part: http://www.vibe.com/news/news_headlines/2007/07/obama2.jpg Paula -

Remember when I said that when it comes to boasting about his experience, Obama reminds me of a little girl who puts on mommy’s lipstick and then stamps around the house in oversized shoes?

Here’s the lipstick part:
http://www.vibe.com/news/news_headlines/2007/07/obama2.jpg

]]> By: kitforhill http://www.hillaryis44.org/2007/07/31/watch-barack-then-and-now/#comment-1402 kitforhill Thu, 02 Aug 2007 02:10:25 +0000 http://www.hillaryis44.org/?p=183#comment-1402 Kegs...ooops i meant "not" being a help to Hillary...where's spellcheck when I need it? Kegs…ooops i meant “not” being a help to Hillary…where’s spellcheck when I need it?

]]>