<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hillary&#8217;s Veep</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hillaryis44.org/2007/06/30/hillarys-veep/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hillaryis44.org/2007/06/30/hillarys-veep/</link>
	<description>We started this website because we believe Senator Hillary Clinton will be an excellent 44th President of the United States.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 17:06:59 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: terrondt</title>
		<link>http://www.hillaryis44.org/2007/06/30/hillarys-veep/#comment-3486</link>
		<dc:creator>terrondt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 19:35:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hillaryis44.org/?p=135#comment-3486</guid>
		<description>go jim webb go!!!! he is my 1st choice.   warner maybe 2nd but i hope he runs for the senate in virgina.  we need bigger majorities to push thru hillary&#039;s agenda.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>go jim webb go!!!! he is my 1st choice.   warner maybe 2nd but i hope he runs for the senate in virgina.  we need bigger majorities to push thru hillary&#8217;s agenda.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hillary Is 44 &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Hillary Clinton&#8217;s Veep</title>
		<link>http://www.hillaryis44.org/2007/06/30/hillarys-veep/#comment-541</link>
		<dc:creator>Hillary Is 44 &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Hillary Clinton&#8217;s Veep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 07:20:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hillaryis44.org/?p=135#comment-541</guid>
		<description>[...] a month ago we wrote: &#8220;Hillary is so dominant a candidate right now that speculation abounds concerning her vice presidenti....&#8221; Hillary is still the dominant Democratic candidate, only more so, even as the Ripublican [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a month ago we wrote: &#8220;Hillary is so dominant a candidate right now that speculation abounds concerning her vice presidenti&#8230;.&#8221; Hillary is still the dominant Democratic candidate, only more so, even as the Ripublican [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.hillaryis44.org/2007/06/30/hillarys-veep/#comment-184</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2007 19:48:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hillaryis44.org/?p=135#comment-184</guid>
		<description>It is early but after the last debate whatever dim doubts there were about Hillary getting the nomination are gone.  That debate was Obama&#039;s moment to shine and he did not.  He was the big question mark.  The question mark is now gone and the answer is he is not ready to debate on the national stage, let alone be president.  

We can all keep our eyes open for potential VP candidates.  Thinking caps are on regarding your qualified ex-dems question.  

We seem to have consensus on Richardson as a good man but a big disappointment.  There was a post on the site sometime back regarding polls on whether people would vote for a Latino.  The results were surprising.  Lots of negative feelings towards voting for a Latino.  Maybe Pew Research will do some more polling on this question.  

Chris Matthews is the one pushing Haley Barbour.  Barbour would be fun to puncture.  His gambling industry ties alone would be fun to document for social conservatives.  

Webb is not as insiderish as you make him sound.  The sense in D.C. is that he is too much of a populist.  

It is early as you say but this cycle is really swinging.  We might see voting this December.  It could happen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is early but after the last debate whatever dim doubts there were about Hillary getting the nomination are gone.  That debate was Obama&#8217;s moment to shine and he did not.  He was the big question mark.  The question mark is now gone and the answer is he is not ready to debate on the national stage, let alone be president.  </p>
<p>We can all keep our eyes open for potential VP candidates.  Thinking caps are on regarding your qualified ex-dems question.  </p>
<p>We seem to have consensus on Richardson as a good man but a big disappointment.  There was a post on the site sometime back regarding polls on whether people would vote for a Latino.  The results were surprising.  Lots of negative feelings towards voting for a Latino.  Maybe Pew Research will do some more polling on this question.  </p>
<p>Chris Matthews is the one pushing Haley Barbour.  Barbour would be fun to puncture.  His gambling industry ties alone would be fun to document for social conservatives.  </p>
<p>Webb is not as insiderish as you make him sound.  The sense in D.C. is that he is too much of a populist.  </p>
<p>It is early as you say but this cycle is really swinging.  We might see voting this December.  It could happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kegs</title>
		<link>http://www.hillaryis44.org/2007/06/30/hillarys-veep/#comment-183</link>
		<dc:creator>Kegs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2007 19:15:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hillaryis44.org/?p=135#comment-183</guid>
		<description>This discussion is way too early but for political
junkies like myself, why not get into it.

Obama&#039;s bungled assault on Bill&#039;s post white house
activities and the Hillary&#039;s (D Punjab) reference leads me grave concern about him.  Aside from the fundraising, I don&#039;t seem turning any red state blue.  Hillary says she want to challenge in the South.  I don&#039;t think he helps

Evan Bayh is not in the progressive mold of his father.  Liberals who are giving Hillary grief will not be happy with his choice.  He might keep swing and conservative democrats voting democratic.  He certainly will help in Ohio.  Nothing will help in Indiana; its to far gone.

I don&#039;t know much about Vilsack strenghts and
weaknesses.  However, his dropping out of the
race as early as he did makes me believe he can&#039;t
add much to the ticket.

As for Richardson, I offer this advice.  Take some
time over the summer to get professional political 
help to improve his skills.  He is a good man but
he seems unprepared and somewhat uncomfortable
in the debates.  It would be interesting to know
if the anit immigration outcry will hurt his candidacy
in a general election with Hillary.

From what I read, the republicans are getting behind Haley Barber for Veep regardless of who is 
at the top spot on thicket.  Therefore, Webb raises an interesting question.  Can he put the south in play?  Would a Hillary/Webb ticket be too &quot;inside the beltway&quot; and too centerist a ticket.  I don&#039;t know.

Besides Vilsack are there any ex-Decocratic office-
holders or cabinet members out there that could
be considered viable for Veep?  

As I said at the top, it is way too early.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This discussion is way too early but for political<br />
junkies like myself, why not get into it.</p>
<p>Obama&#8217;s bungled assault on Bill&#8217;s post white house<br />
activities and the Hillary&#8217;s (D Punjab) reference leads me grave concern about him.  Aside from the fundraising, I don&#8217;t seem turning any red state blue.  Hillary says she want to challenge in the South.  I don&#8217;t think he helps</p>
<p>Evan Bayh is not in the progressive mold of his father.  Liberals who are giving Hillary grief will not be happy with his choice.  He might keep swing and conservative democrats voting democratic.  He certainly will help in Ohio.  Nothing will help in Indiana; its to far gone.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know much about Vilsack strenghts and<br />
weaknesses.  However, his dropping out of the<br />
race as early as he did makes me believe he can&#8217;t<br />
add much to the ticket.</p>
<p>As for Richardson, I offer this advice.  Take some<br />
time over the summer to get professional political<br />
help to improve his skills.  He is a good man but<br />
he seems unprepared and somewhat uncomfortable<br />
in the debates.  It would be interesting to know<br />
if the anit immigration outcry will hurt his candidacy<br />
in a general election with Hillary.</p>
<p>From what I read, the republicans are getting behind Haley Barber for Veep regardless of who is<br />
at the top spot on thicket.  Therefore, Webb raises an interesting question.  Can he put the south in play?  Would a Hillary/Webb ticket be too &#8220;inside the beltway&#8221; and too centerist a ticket.  I don&#8217;t know.</p>
<p>Besides Vilsack are there any ex-Decocratic office-<br />
holders or cabinet members out there that could<br />
be considered viable for Veep?  </p>
<p>As I said at the top, it is way too early.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
